SA bowlers go where batters don’t to earn ODI series lead

South Africa have scored faster than a run-a-ball only four times in their last 100 ODIs.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

BEFORE Friday, South Africa had last played a men’s ODI against England in Bloemfontein in February 2016. How had the teams’ games developed in the ensuing almost seven years, the good burghers of Bloem might have asked as they settled onto the grass banks and eyed the Barmy Army in all its awkward, incongruous Englishness.

The home supporters wouldn’t have liked the answer to the question that unfolded in the first innings. But they would have been relieved that not everything had changed: South Africa could still bowl their way out of trouble. Their win, by 27 runs, was unlikely for much of the match and needs to be followed by several others.

Four more victories will be required against England and the Netherlands in the coming weeks if Temba Bavuma’s team are to focus directly on the World Cup in India in October and November, and not on the qualifying tournament in Zimbabwe in June and July. Ifs and buts involving Sri Lanka and Ireland could complicate the equation, but not if South Africa keep winning.
They will have their next opportunity to do so on Sunday, also in Bloemfontein and also against England. But in a day game, which should mean a touch more life in the pitch early in the piece than was the case in Friday’s day/nighter.  

England have played 115 ODIs since that 2016 game. They have scored faster than a run-a-ball over the course of an innings in all but six of them, and they last dipped below that mark in June 2016. Along the way they deservedly reached the 2019 World Cup final, where they were awarded the trophy despite a tie with New Zealand.

In South Africa’s 100 games, they’ve scored more than six runs an over just four times — all of them between February 2016 and February 2017. That’s as stark an illustration as could be found of these teams’ opposite directions of travel.

The trend continued on Friday. South Africa squandered a sound start on a perfect batting pitch to total 298/7. Conditions became less inclined towards run-scoring as the ball softened, but that didn’t adequately explain the home side taking almost seven overs to get to three figures after reaching 75/1 after 10. They scored just 28 more runs in the second half of their innings compared to the first, even though they had seven wickets standing going into the second 25 overs.

That was despite Rassie van der Dussen making 111 and sharing 110 off 101 with David Miller, who scored 53. Van der Dussen, a player built for storms rather than sunshine, was at his flinty best once the surface had lost its early willingness and begun begrudging runs. That didn’t suit Miller, but he endured in a stand that lasted from the 31st over into the 48th — prime time to launch a total well north of 300.

Except that South Africa, not for the first time, failed to launch. Some short deliveries climbed and others squatted, but champion batters find ways of overcoming those challenges. They don’t merely live with them. The South African who showed the greatest sense of urgency was Bavuma, whose 36 off 28 as an opener represented his team’s batting unit’s only strike rate higher than 100. 

South Africa were able to hit only 120 of their total — just more than 40% — in fours and sixes despite Bloemfontein’s famously spacious boundaries being drawn in significantly. England got away with 43% of the innings in dot balls.

Jofra Archer, who played his first match for England since March 2021, sent down more scoreless deliveries than any of England’s other bowlers: 30. But his return of 1/81 was also his most expensive in his 18 ODIs. He went for 10 or more in four of his overs, and in one of them for 20. That said, Archer bowled well within himself, clearly feeling his way back into the game after so long out with injuries.

The accurate, slippery Sam Curran made life more difficult for the South Africans than the rest of England’s attack. He was rewarded with the wickets of Quinton de Kock, Van der Dussen and Miller at the handsome economy rate of 3.88.

The last thing South Africa needed after that was for England to hit the ground running in their reply, which is exactly what Jason Roy and Dawid Malan did in an opening partnership of 146 off 118 that seemed to set the tone for a thumping victory for the visitors.

There was poetry in Sisanda Magala breaking the stranglehold. In his second over, the 20th, his bouncer flummoxed Malan, who contrived to pull a catch to mid-off and go for 59. Magala, a proven performer at domestic level, has struggled with fitness issues and poor discipline on the international stage — he sent down three wides and two no-balls in each of the other two ODIs in which he has bowled. He was the last of the six bowlers Bavuma used on Friday. And the best.

Magala followed his removal of Malan by trapping Harry Brook in front with a sniping inswinger and having Moeen Ali caught in the deep with a brisk short delivery. His 3/46 from nine overs marked the first time he had taken more than one wicket in an ODI and the first time he had gone for fewer than a run a ball. It was also the first time his confidence has shone through so emphatically.

But while Magala was showing he belonged, Roy appeared to be winning the match. He stayed until the 30th over for his bristling, bustling 91-ball 113, the only time he has passed 50 in 32 innings of any sort save for a T10 half-century in Abu Dhabi in November. Roy’s 11th ODI century means only Joe Root, Eoin Morgan and Marcus Trescothick have scored more ODI hundreds for England, all with the benefit of significantly more innings than Roy.

Roy’s dismissal fell between those of Brook and Moeen, but while England still had Jos Buttler they had control of the game. That changed in 37th, when Anrich Nortjé speared a shortish delivery on the line of off stump. Buttler, cramped for room to guide the ball to deep third, was caught behind for 36. It was the second strike in Nortjé’s haul of 4/62, which was key to South Africa claiming all 10 of England’s wickets for 125 in 25 overs.

South Africa’s disastrous T20 World Cup, when they crashed out ignominiously by losing to the Netherlands, was followed by a flaccid Test series in Australia, where only rain in Sydney spared them a 3-0 whitewash. International cricket itself has been diminished and dulled by the booming positivity of the SA20, which has given South Africans rare reasons to be cheerful about just about anything.

Friday’s gritty win, South Africa’s first in three ODIs and for all England’s batting progress their fourth consecutive loss, will remedy that situation. But the good burghers of Bloemfontein and the Barmy Army alike went to bed knowing that could change on Sunday.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

How to get out of jail? Ask a jailer

“Having watched him, the way he used to bowl, he has given me a lot of confidence as a young player knowing someone like that is now on my journey.” – Lungi Ngidi on Charl Langeveldt.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

IN Charl Langeveldt’s previous life he was a prison warder. So he knows all about getting out of jail. And how to transfer his knowledge of escapology to the bowlers he now coaches. South Africa benefitted greatly from those skills at Buffalo Park in East London on Wednesday, when they won a match they should have lost.

England needed 50 off the last six overs to win the first T20. By then Jason Roy had sent 36 balls careening into the night for his unbeaten 66. Eoin Morgan’s 23 not out had come off 19 deliveries. Both seemed intent on taking their team home with plenty of balls to spare. Surely Joe Denly, Ben Stokes, Moeen Ali, Tom Curran and Chris Jordan would, between them, score what Roy and Morgan didn’t? And without having to resort to Adil Rashid and Mark Wood. So how did England shamble to 176/9? They choked.

“These type of wins, we want to be able to scrape them in the big events,” Temba Bavuma said of the only one-run defeat yet inflicted on England in their 115 matches in the format, and with a view to the T20 World Cup in Australia in October and November. “We know we’re going to be called upon to do that. The best time to start is against top teams like England.”

As big a role as England played in their downfall, it was up to South Africa to do the necessary once the rabbits were frozen in the headlights. Enter Langeveldt. Of the 90 deliveries bowled by South Africa’s seamers, more than half — 49 — were slower balls. Some were off-cutters, some leg-cutters, some tumbled down the pitch out of the back of the hand.

One, quite beautifully bowled by Dale Steyn, was still above Jonny Bairstow’s eyeline in the two metres before it reached him. Then it dropped like a dead pigeon, forcing Bairstow to stab his bat directly downward to keep the damned thing away from his pads and his wicket. Steyn smiled in wonder. Bairstow smiled in desperation. Umpire Adrian Holdstock smiled with relief that he didn’t have to decide whether the ball would have hit the stumps.

Beuran Hendricks wasn’t used until the 15th over. Dwaine Pretorius didn’t bowl at all. That prompted the conservatives — some of them on SuperSport’s commentary team — to protest, even after the match was won. Can they not take yes for an answer? Because they once played international cricket doesn’t mean they understand how international cricket is played now. When next they get the chance to talk to Langeveldt, they could do worse than learn from him so they don’t expose their ignorance and arrogance.

The bowlers won Wednesday’s game; Langeveldt’s bowlers. He forged a career not by bruising batters into submission in the time-honoured South African way but by seizing on the small things — a smidgen of swing, a modicum of movement, an attitude of all’s good — to do big things. He found ways to win matches, particularly with the white ball. Langeveldt’s 100 ODI wickets amount to a touch more than a quarter of Shaun Pollock’s South Africa record of 387. But Pollock bowled 2,571.4 overs and Langeveldt 581.3. That’s 11,941 more deliveries for Pollock, or almost four-and-a-half times as many opportunities as Langeveldt had.

Lungi Ngidi was 14 years old when Langeveldt played the last of his 87 games for South Africa in October 2010. Almost 10 years on at Buffalo Park on Wednesday, a taller, faster, blacker version of Langeveldt, who looked a lot like Ngidi, not only defended seven off the last over but had Curran caught in the deep with an off-cutter and conjured a breathlessly paceless delivery to nail Moeen’s off stump.

“He’s had a massive impact in terms of the mental side,” Ngidi said of Langeveldt’s influence. “Having watched him, the way he used to bowl, he has given me a lot of confidence as a young player knowing someone like that is now on my journey. He has made sure I back the skills that I’m good at. Where someone else would say maybe a change of [the type of] ball was needed or maybe a yorker, [he says] stick to what’s working. And it worked out just fine.”

Langeveldt’s was easily the least heralded of the appointments South Africa made in December. The headlines were reserved largely for Graeme Smith, Mark Boucher and Jacques Kallis. That they had bigger playing careers than Langeveldt is beyond question. They loom larger in the memory of South Africans who remember a time when the game was in better shape. They are the poster boys for an improved present. They carry a heavier share of the hopes for a brighter future. But what do they know about getting out of jail? 

First published by Cricbuzz.

2nd ODI preview: Off to Kingsmead? Take an umbrella

South Africa have gone 10 games without consecutive wins.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

THE last time the weather didn’t kibosh an ODI involving England at Kingsmead, Nasser Hussain was their captain and Javagal Srinath suffered the last of his 11 first-ball dismissals in a blue India shirt. It was February 2003 and India won that World Cup clash by 82 runs. Since then both of England’s games in the format against South Africa in Durban have been washed out.

And, wouldn’t you know it, a 90% chance of rain has been forecast for Friday’s second ODI. That will hardly be news to South Africa. They’ve suffered no more than one washout at any of their other home venues, but four of the 38 ODIs they have played at Kingsmead have ended inconclusively because of the elements. When nature stays out of the way in Durban, South Africa are twice as likely to win: they’ve been victorious in 11 and lost 22 ODIs there.

On the evidence of the first game of the series, at Newlands on Tuesday, rain may be good news for the visitors. They were as flat as Table Mountain itself in all departments, blowing the advantage of an opening stand of 51 between Jason Roy and Jonny Bairstow as well as a recovery partnership of 91 shared by Joe Denly and Chris Woakes to finish with a mediocre 258/8. And then failing utterly to put a dent in South Africa’s reply, which reached its target with only three wickets down and 14 balls remaining.

So the South Africans won’t be best pleased if Friday’s game doesn’t go the distance. Having crashed to a hattrick of defeats in the Test series against England, Tuesday’s win was welcomed as a sign of better things to come. It was Quinton de Kock’s first match as South Africa’s appointed captain, and he responded to that challenge by scoring 107. With him in a stand of 170 was Temba Bavuma, who uncorked a hitherto hidden gift for white-ball batting at international level with a scintillating 98. That followed Tabraiz Shamsi returning from proving his fitness at a conditioning camp to take 3/38.

It’s only one game and it’s only an ODI at that, but considering what went before it’s not difficult to understand why South Africans want to consider Tuesday’s triumph a turning point. They won’t be keen to remember that their team also won the first Test before their form plummetted, but that only means they will be even more intent on seeing how De Kock’s side go in Durban on Friday. Consecutive victories? Imagine that.

South Africa have gone 10 games without winning two in a row, a streak of inconsistency that started after they beat Sri Lanka and Australia at last year’s World Cup — by which time they had already been eliminated from the running for the knockout rounds.

So South Africa will want to keep doing what they did in Cape Town, which would earn them series honours. England will be bent on putting that game behind them. But if the weather has its way, all hopes will be on hold util the last match of the rubber at the Wanderers on Sunday. 

When: Friday February 7, 2020. 1pm Local Time  

Where: Kingsmead, Durban

What to expect: This is one of South Africa’s slowest pitches, but all four five-wicket hauls in ODIs have been claimed by seamers. Runs flow faster — 4.85 an over — than at Newlands — 4.70 — although not as fluidly as at the Wanderers — 5.16, not least because Kingsmead’s outfield isn’t the fastest. Teams have put up 300 or more than 300 six times in Durban, but only once in the second innings. In the 46 ODIs played here, teams have been dismissed 27 times.   

Team news

South Africa

Why fix what ain’t broke? But, having handed Jon-Jon Smuts and Lutho Sipamla ODI debuts in Cape Town, South Africa might be tempted to blood one or more of left-arm spinner Bjorn Fortuin, opening batter Janneman Malan and altogether uncapped wicketkeeper-batter Kyle Verreynne. Malan, in particular, looks like cracking the nod after Reeza Hendricks’ lacklustre showing — caught behind for six off 14 balls — at Newlands.    

Possible XI: Quinton de Kock, Janneman Malan, Temba Bavuma, Rassie van der Dussen, Jon-Jon Smuts, David Miller, Andile Phehlukwayo, Beuran Hendricks, Lungi Ngidi, Lutho Sipamla, Tabraiz Shamsi.   

England

Opener Dawid Malan’s exclusion at Newlands didn’t make much sense, so he should win what would be his second cap in the format. Fast bowler Saqib Mahmood could make an ODI debut. Truth be told, England looked so out if it in Cape Town that coach Chris Silverwood would be forgiven for emptying his bench.

Possible XI: Dawid Malan, Jason Roy, Joe Root, Eoin Morgan, Tom Banton, Moeen Ali, Tom Curran, Chris Woakes, Adil Rashid, Matt Parkinson, Saqib Mahmood.

“It looks a little bit dry, but Kingsmead always has that extra bounce and I enjoy that. I don’t feel like I need the ball to spin. Most spinner enjoy the extra bounce.” – Tabraiz Shamsi on the Durban pitch.

“We’ve lost games of cricket before and come back to win the series, so I don’t think it’s a massive confidence knock. The boys are going to be training hard trying to level the series tomorrow.” – Tom Curran talks a good practice session.  

First published by Cricbuzz.  

Townships could be just the ticket for MSL

“Currently the MSL is the second-most watched T20 league in the world behind the IPL.” – Thabang Moroe talks a big game. 

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

IF you live in a township, the Mzansi Super League (MSL) could be coming to a ground near you.

The troubled tournament, now in its second edition and still without a headline sponsor or the prospect of breaking even, is currently playing out to mostly empty stands in the country’s major stadiums.

Except in Paarl, where the ground is part of the eastern suburb of Amstelhof, a disadvantaged coloured part of town.

A crowd of 5 500, the MSL’s biggest so far this year, attended the match between the Paarl Rocks’ home game against the Cape Town Blitz on Sunday.

That’s almost twice as many as the 2 844 who saw the Jozi Stars play the Nelson Mandela Giants at the Wanderers last week — despite the facts that the game was played on a Saturday and that it featured drawcards Chris Gayle, Kagiso Rabada and Jason Roy.

Only 3 104 were at St George’s Park on Wednesday to see the Giants beat a Cape Town Blitz side studded with Quinton de Kock, Dale Steyn and Wahab Riaz in a thrilling contest that was decided with only four balls to spare.

Paarl is undoubtedly a cricketminded place, so there’s no need to convince the locals to turn up.

But it wouldn’t have hurt that there are, comparatively, fewer entertainment options there than in bigger centres; neither that the competition appears to have been better marketed in Paarl than elsewhere.  

Those factors haven’t gone unnoticed. 

In an interview with television channel Newzroom Afrika on Thursday night, Cricket South Africa chief executive Thabang Moroe said: “We have to look at the Paarl Rocks and their stadium in the Boland and the number of people they are attracting.

“They’re people who’ve been hungry for cricket content — the stadium is in a township, and access is one of South African people’s problems.

“Not many people can afford to get to the stadiums and leave as late as the matches finish, and not everybody’s got access to a car to make it to the ground.

“Those are some of the things we need to work on to make sure we get those bums on seats, and help in getting people back home.”

Moroe said the MSL was “a perfect competition” to “take to the people”.

“We need to go back to the drawing board and look at our strategy and say, are we taking it to the right stadiums?

“And what would be the right answers in terms of moving matches around?”

A challenge to the noble aim of taking the MSL to the people is that every township ground beside Paarl’s would likely require a significant upgrade before it could host events of that size.

That’s a searing indictment of CSA, considering unity was proclaimed 28 years ago.

The blame for that can’t be laid at the door of Moroe, who admitted that swathes of empty seats was “not a good look” and correctly countered with “we need to look at previous domestic competitions, where attendance has been just as poor”.

Also, the weather hasn’t been a cricket fan, what with a third of the dozen games played so far washed out.

But Moroe made the stunning although unexplained claim, which was not interrogated on air, that the MSL was “currently the second-most watched T20 league in the world behind the IPL”.

Why then, besides the valid reasons Moroe has given, are so few people interested in seeing it first-hand?

And why, if the MSL is such a hot property, do almost no potential backers want to put their money where the tournament’s mouth is?

“We had a lot of work to get through in terms of commercial agreements that we needed to work on and sign in order to get the league over the line this year,” Moroe said.

“From the commercial side of things, there really isn’t that much work left to do.

“Except working hard on getting sponsors in.”

Maybe CSA should have done that first.

First published by TMG Digital.

MSL catches fire in PE

As a window into what the MSL could be if major players in the sponsorship and broadcast world were able to have confidence that it was a good place to spend their money, it was bittersweet.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

THE Mzansi Super League (MSL) took the edge off its problems by delivering the closest game yet in this year’s competition at St George’s Park on Wednesday.

Plagued by inadequate sponsorship and broadcast revenue, ineffective marketing, little prospect of breaking even, and tiny crowds, the MSL doesn’t have much going for it.

But, for three or so hours while the Nelson Mandela Bay Giants and the Cape Town Blitz conjured a contest for the ages, none of that mattered as acutely.

The Blitz put up a decent 186/9 — the Warriors’ 189 against the Cobras in April is the only higher T20 first innings at this ground, and remains the record total — and the Giants reeled it in with five wickets standing and four balls to spare.

Janneman Malan and Quinton de Kock shared 72 for the first wicket for the second time in the tournament in scoring 31 and 39, and the rest of the visitors’ top five — Marques Ackerman, Liam Livingstone and Asif Ali — added another 87 to the total.

But the Giants fought back, taking 5/22 to limit the damage effectively.

Chris Morris, Junior Dala, Imran Tahir and Onke Nyaku claimed two wickets each with Tahir’s 2/26 and economy rate of 6.50 the standout showing.

The Giants seemed sunk without trace after only nine balls, what with openers Matthew Breetzke and Jason Roy gone with just three runs scored.

But captain Jon-Jon Smuts stood tall through partnerships of 53 with Ben Dunk, 46 with Heino Kuhn and 48 with Marco Marais before slashing a catch to backward point to go for a 51-ball 73.

Smuts’ gutsy effort included a reprieve for a no-ball dismissal by Wahab Riaz and surviving a lengthy review for a catch by George Linde at short fine leg off Sisanda Magala.

His exit, forced by a near no-ball from Wahab, left Marais — the cleanest, crispest, hardest hitter in South African cricket since Rassie van der Dussen — and Morris to get the job done, which they did by clattering 37 off 18 balls.

Morris clinched it in soap opera style with a mighty heave off Magala, which Linde, diving for all his worth on the midwicket fence, almost caught.

Instead the ball was deflected onto the boundary cushion, which cost the Blitz six runs, the match, and their position at the top of the standings — a spot now occupied by the Giants.

As a game of cricket it was the stuff of dreams: dramatic and intensely competitive with a fair sprinkling of quality individual performances.

As a window into what the tournament could be if major players in the sponsorship and broadcast world were able to have confidence that the MSL was a good place to spend their money, it was bittersweet.

Reality resumed, and with it an interview Hashim Amla gave to Pakistani website PakPassion.

“I find it very amusing whenever this whole subject of Kolpak and its effects on South African cricket are brought up,” Amla was quoted as saying.

“Kolpak has been around for a long time, and so it’s surprising to me that it is been touted as the reason for all evils only because we lost the recent Test series to India [3-0 in October].

“I do not want this idea to become a convenient excuse for what basically were bad performances against India.

“When I was playing domestic cricket, we had quite a number of Kolpak players in our domestic teams also but then there was no talk of this subject.

“Let’s be honest about it, India are a really good side and they will probably beat all teams at home and the fact is that we did not play that well during the tour.

“Now one may argue that I am saying this because I have signed to play for Surrey next year as a Kolpak player but my story is slightly different as I have a few years of international cricket under my belt.

“The fact remains that this whole issue has gained importance just due to recent bad performances.”

Amla spoke from the United Arab Emirates, where he is playing for the Karnataka Tuskers in the Abu Dhabi T10 — a fact that on its own is indicative of some of South African cricket’s problems beyond Kolpak.

Having served as the Blitz’ batting consultant, free of charge, Amla has done his bit for the MSL.

But, if the game was in better shape at home, wouldn’t he prefer playing in the MSL to some gimmick far away?

You didn’t need to be at St George’s Park on Wednesday to answer that question.

First published by TMG Digital.

MSL loses most of 2018’s foreign stars

The biggest loss is Rashid Khan, the leading T20 bowler in the world and ninth among the wicket-takers and joint fourth in economy rate at the 2019 Indian Premier League.

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in London

THE Mzansi Super League (MSL) has lost most of the foreign “marquee” players who appeared in its first edition, but has hung on to most of their local counterparts.

Of the six foreigners who had the highest profile in last year’s tournament, only Chris Gayle and Jason Roy will return in November, according to a Cricket South Africa (CSA) release on Wednesday.

They will be joined by Wahab Riaz, Alex Hales, David Willey and Tom Curran. 

Eoin Morgan, Dawid Malan, Dwayne Bravo and Rashid Khan will not be back, not in the same role in the same role at least.

The biggest loss is probably Khan, who is the leading T20 bowler in the world and was ninth among the wicket-takers and joint fourth in terms of the economy rate at this year’s Indian Premier League (IPL).

It’s difficult to say whether this year’s intake represents a bigger drawcard than 2018’s, but of the six only Hales features in the top 10 international T20 batting, bowling and allrounder rankings.

Only Gayle was among the leading 10 runscorers at this year’s IPL, and none of the six made it onto that list wicket-takers or economical bowlers.

“Entertainment is going to be the name of the game and the quality of T20 cricket is assured with these players having become global household names on the circuit around the world with most of them having played in the world-leading IPL,” the release quoted CSA chief executive Thabang Moroe as saying.

Moroe’s assertion holds slightly more water in terms of the South African players named.

Andile Phehlukwayo is the lone representative in the world rankings at No. 9 on the bowling list, while Quinton de Kock was the third-highest runscorer at the IPL, where no-one took more wickets than Imran Tahir and Kagiso Rabada.

Phehlukwayo replaces Hashim Amla, who retired from international cricket last week, in the only change to the six South African headline MSL players.

The tournament is set to be played in November and December.

MSL marquee players:

South African: Quinton de Kock (Cape Town Blitz), Andile Phehlukwayo (Durban Heat), Kagiso Rabada (Jozi Stars), Imran Tahir (Nelson Mandela Bay Giants), Faf du Plessis (Paarl Rocks), AB de Villiers (Tshwane Spartans).

International: Wahab Riaz (Cape Town), Alex Hales (Durban), Chris Gayle (Johannesburg), Jason Roy (Nelson Mandela Bay), David Willey (Paarl), Tom Curran (Tshwane).

Stokes wins closest ever World Cup final for England

Good luck to the keepers of cricket’s annals, who will struggle to smuggle this scoreline neatly into their records.

TMG Digital + Print

TELFORD VICE at Lord’s

BEN Stokes played a charmed innings to mastermind England’s triumph in the most closely fought final in men’s World Cup history.

England, who played in their fourth final, claimed the trophy for the first time by beating New Zealand, who had reached in the decider for the second consecutive time.

But it needed a super over to separate the sides after the match was tied — New Zealand totalled 241/8 and England were dismissed for 241.

Even that wasn’t enough to decide the issue: both teams scored 15 runs in the super over, so the equation was further distilled to which side had hit the most boundaries.

All told, super over and everything, New Zealand hit 14 fours and three sixes.

England? Twenty-four fours and two sixes.

Arise, World Cup champions. And good luck to the keepers of the annals, who will struggle to smuggle that scoreline neatly into their records.

New Zealand have batted first only three other times in their 11 games in the tournament, and twice in those matches they have made smaller totals than Sunday’s 241/8. They won one of those games and lost the other.

Their most dependable batters, Kane Williamson and Ross Taylor, who between them had scored both of the centuries and five of the 11 half-centuries the Kiwis have made during the World Cup going into the final, were dismissed for 30 and 15.

It was left to opener Henry Nicholls, playing only his third match of a tournament in which his 28 against India in the semi-final at Old Trafford, to provide stability with his 77-ball 55.

Williamson helped Nicholls add 74 for the second wicket, the only half-century stand of the innings, and No. 5 Tom Latham’s 47 was New Zealand’s next best effort.

Chris Woakes and Jofra Archer used the new ball effectively for England, and Woakes took 3/37.

Liam Plunkett claimed 3/42, taking all of his wickets with cross-seam deliveries.

Of England’s six bowlers, only Stokes, who went wicketless for 20 off three overs, conceded five or more runs a ball.

New Zealand defended a lower total as recently as Wednesday, when they made 239/8 in their semi-final against India at Old Trafford and won by 18 runs.

But they reduced the Indians to 5/3 in the first 19 balls of the innings — the like of which they couldn’t repeat on Sunday.

Instead Jonny Bairstow stood firm through stands of 28 with Jason Roy and 31 with Joe Root.

Roy was fortunate to survive, by the slimmest of “umpire’s call” margins, which was handed down after South Africa’s Marius Erasmus decided the Englishman was not out, when the New Zealanders reviewed Trent Boult’s shout for lbw off the first ball of the innings.

Then Colin de Grandhomme dropped a return catch Bairstow offered in the 11th, when he was 18 and England were 39/1.

Root gave De Grandhomme some solace six overs later when he flashed at a wide delivery and was caught behind.

Bairstow went for 36 three overs after that, dragging Lockie Ferguson onto his stumps.

And when Ferguson roared in from the cover boundary to catch, centimetres from the turf, Jimmy Neesham’s first ball of the match — which had been hammered there by Eoin Morgan — England were 86/4 and reduced to their last pair of proper batters.

But they were Stokes and Jos Buttler, and they clipped 110 runs off 133 balls in a largely controlled partnership that endured into the 45th over and took England to within 46 runs of victory.

It ended when Buttler hammered Ferguson to deep cover, where substitute Tim Southee held a fine sliding catch. Buttler’s 60 came off 60 balls and included six fours.

That started a slide of six wickets for 45 runs, but Stokes survived for an undefeated 84 off 98 balls with five fours and two sixes.

England were 220/7 with Stokes 63 not out and in the 49th over when he smashed Neesham to the midwicket boundary — where Boult fell over the boundary and turned a catch into a six.

England needed 15 off the 50th over, and Stokes lofted Boult for six over midwicket.

That narrowed the equation to nine off three — clearly in the Kiwis’ favour.

Stokes smacked Boult to midwicket along the ground, and Martin Guptill’s throw hit Stokes as he dived to make his ground.

From there, it scooted over the boundary to earn six runs off one delivery.

That meant England needed three runs off two balls, but only two were added as Adil Rashid and Mark Wood were run out in the process.

That tied the scores, prompting the super over.

Stokes and Buttler returned to club 15 runs off Boult, each of them hitting a four.

Neesham and Guptill came out to face Archer, and Neesham lifted a massive six over midwicket off the second ball.

Two were required off the last ball, but Guptill was run out by Roy’s throw to wicketkeeper Buttler scrambling back for the second.

That tied the scores again, but for only as long as it took to tally up the boundaries.

England Goliath against Kiwi David

England and New Zealand have the resources to turn themselves into better versions of themselves. South Africa, comparatively, do not.

Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in London

ENGLAND have drunk deeply of the Kool-Aid of how good people have said they are on their march to Sunday’s men’s World Cup final at Lord’s.

New Zealand, whose coach, Gary Stead, once washed the windows of the august Pavilion, seem almost embarrassed to share a field with these legends of their own lore.

Eoin Morgan’s Irish accent got in the way, but his Churchillian intent shone through after his team’s emphatic eight-wicket semi-final win at Edgbaston on Thursday: “Sunday’s not a day to shy away from; it’s a day to look forward to, much like today.

“We have created the opportunity to play in a World Cup final. It will be a matter of the same again trying to produce everything that we can performance-wise, but enjoy the day.”

Contrast that with what Kane Williamson said about handling the pressure of hanging onto the steepler offered by Ravindra Jadeja, who seemed to be smashing India to victory in the other semi, at Old Trafford on Wednesday: “Someone goes ‘catch it’ and it’s above me so it must be mine.”

It’s a neat script for one of sport’s most compelling screenplays: David versus Goliath.

Better yet, there are lessons in the protagonists’ contrasting approaches for South Africa, whose performance at the tournament was far below their capabilities.

Having believed for so long that they were among world cricket’s big boys, they weren’t ready for the bleak truth that they aren’t — even after trying to tell themselves exactly that.

Not so England, who did not reach a semi-final for six tournaments after losing the 1992 final to Pakistan. Group stage exits in half of them tells, unarguably, a tale of decline.

But this time England have some of the most booming bats in the game. Jonny Bairstow and Jason Roy average 69.47, more than any other opening pair in one-day history. Joe Root has scored two centuries, Morgan and Jos Buttler a ton each.

This marks the sixth time in a dozen World Cups that New Zealand have forged to or past the semi-finals. They are the little country that can. Almost. They went one step further four years ago, but were swiped aside by Australia in the final.

Unlike South Africa, New Zealand know who they are and what they can do. They bring an attack that rasps with the pace of Lockie Ferguson and the swing of Trent Boult, and the key on Sunday will be how the batters in blue square up to the bowlers in black.

England and New Zealand have the resources to turn themselves into better versions of themselves. South Africa, comparatively, do not.

But it comes down to more than money. It’s also about belief, and South Africa are all out of the stuff. For now. 

England make history, and earn chance to make more

TMG Digital + Print

TELFORD VICE in London

ENGLAND made men’s World Cup history at Edgbaston on Thursday, and earned the chance to do so again at Lord’s on Sunday.

Chris Woakes and Adil Rashid shared six wickets before Jason Roy hammered 85, 66 of them in fours and sixes, to earn the English victory over the Aussies by eight wickets with 17.5 overs to spare in their semi-final — and with it a crack at New Zealand in Sunday’s final at Lord’s.

Australia lost a semi for the first time, and new champions will be crowned this year: England have been to three finals and the New Zealanders to one, but neither have won the trophy.

England were last in the final in 1992, when they were beaten by Pakistan, and New Zealand lost out to Australia four years ago.

Eoin Morgan’s side reduced Australia to 14/3 inside seven overs before Steve Smith and Alex Carey put the innings back on track with a stand of 103.

Carey was four not out when he was struck on the grille of his helmet by Jofra Archer, a blow that lacerated the Australian’s chin.

After receiving treatment he batted on until the 28th over, when he was caught at deep midwicket off Rashid for 46.

Smith marshalled stands of 39 with Glenn Maxwell and 51 with Mitchell Starc before he was run out for 85 in the 48th trying to take a bye.

Woakes took 3/20 off eight overs with Rashid claiming 3/54 from his full quota.

England’s triumph was all but sealed in an opening stand of 174 by Roy and Jonny Bairstow — who have the highest average of all first-wicket pairs in one-day international history.

Bairstow, who needed treatment after collapsing with an apparent leg injury in the 12th over, recovered to score 34 before being trapped in from by Starc in the 18th.

That was Starc’s 27th wicket of the tournament, which broke the World Cup record set by another Australian, Glenn McGrath, in 2007.

A dozen balls later Roy was given out caught behind by Kumar Dharmasena after sparring at a legside delivery from Pat Cummins.

Replays showed the ball had hit neither bat nor glove, but Roy couldn’t be granted a reprieve because Bairstow had used England’s review after he was given out.

Roy stood his ground and remonstrated with Dharmasena and his colleague, Marais Erasmus, who had to convince the English to leave the crease.

“Fucking embarrassing,” Roy, who faced 65 balls and hit nine fours and five sixes, could clearly be heard saying on television as he left the scene.

His dismissal did nothing to derail his team’s impending success, and Joe Root and Eoin Morgan took England home with an unbroken stand of 79.

The Australians have been to seven World Cup finals and won five of them.

The closest they came to going down at the penultimate hurdle before Thursday’s game was their 1999 semi against South Africa, which was tied.

That match was also played at Edgbaston, where Australia last won in July 2001 — 15 matches ago in all formats.

Gayle’s unacceptable presence aside, CSA tick T20 boxes

CSA’s description of Chris Gayle as a ‘T20 living legend’ chimes with the tone-deaf clumsiness that has fuelled the #MeToo movement.

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in London

THERE has been plenty of reason to doubt Cricket South Africa’s (CSA) ability to deliver the T20 tournament they have promised the country’s cricketminded public this summer.

But even the hardest-hearted cynic would have to admit their plan seems to be coming together.

As recently as lunchtime on Thursday neither the competition’s name, its franchises, its venues nor any of the likely players’ names were known.

By that afternoon the grounds were announced, followed just more than 24 hours later by the event’s title — the Mzansi Super League (MSL).

On Monday afternoon we knew that the MSL would involve the Cape Town Blitz, the Durban Heat, the Jozi Stars, the Nelson Mandela Bay Giants, the Paarl Rocks and the Tshwane Spartans.

We also knew the names of the marquee South Africa players — Faf du Plessis, AB de Villiers, Hashim Amla, JP Duminy, Kagiso Rabada and Imran Tahir — and that they would be in the colours of Paarl, Tshwane, Durban, Cape Town, Jozi and Nelson Mandela Bay respectively.

And that the major foreign players in Wednesday’s draft in Johannesburg will be Eoin Morgan, Jason Roy, Dawid Malan, Chris Gayle, Dwayne Bravo and Rashid Khan.

Not bad for a tournament that’s giving its broadcast rights to the SABC for no fee and, Times Media Digital understands, has tried but failed to secure Chinese electronics giant Huawei as a title sponsor.

Other obstacles remain, not least that all six foreigners named on Monday — along with the bulk of the world’s more notable T20 player fodder — are on the books of franchises in the T10 tournament set to be played in Sharjah from November 23 to December 2.

Then there’s the significant but apparently ignored truth that Gayle is an unrepentant misogynist whose crassly cringeworthy attempt, live on air in January 2016, to ask a television interviewer out on a date has made him unemployable in Australia’s Big Bash League.

So the wrongheaded description of the Jamaican as a “T20 living legend” on CSA’s Twitter feed on Monday chimed with the kind of tone-deaf clumsiness that has fuelled the #MeToo movement.

But CSA chief executive Thabang Moroe’s positivity shone out from a CSA release on Monday.

“We have received applications from over 200 top international players who expressed interest in playing in this inaugural tournament and will have their names in the hat ahead of the player draft process on Wednesday,” Moroe was quoted as saying.

“There were expected challenges in the process, of course, with some players available for a particular period because of other cricket commitment clashes elsewhere, including our Proteas, who also have to fulfill our tour to Australia for a one-day international series [which ends on November 17].”

A lot remains to be done for CSA to make good on their ambition to bring the big top T20 circus to a ground near you, or at least within a day’s driving.

But a lot has been done; more, probably, than was thought possible, nevermind probable.