Meet Keegan Petersen: Mr Modernism, the Bauhaus batter

“South Africans don’t just go away and die. We fight for what we believe in and we are very strong.” – Keegan Petersen

Telford Vice | Cape Town

IF you watched Keegan Petersen in the Test series against India, you know he’s a serious man. The diligence, the stickability, the unflusterability, the beautiful care he showed marked him out as someone not to be dismissed as a lightweight.

Or someone to dismiss easily. He faced more than 100 balls in half of his six innings, and never fewer than 22. He batted for at least an hour four times, and for 59 minutes in the second innings at Centurion. He was at the crease for more than four hours in the first innings at Newlands, and for more than three hours in the second dig. In the first innings at the Wanderers, he was there for three minutes short of three hours.

He was much more than there. Petersen scored important runs in a team not expected to score many. He did so on pitches that did not favour batters, and against a gun attack. He scored his runs unvarnished: see the ball, hit the ball, run, rinse, repeat.

Precocious players pose for pictures after they have crafted a noteworthy stroke. Petersen is many things, but he is not precocious. He plays a shot, takes the runs he has earned, and plays another. Or defends and defends and defends until there is an opportunity to pierce the field. There is nothing ornamental about his batting. If Jacques Kallis was Baroque, Petersen is Mr Modernism: the Bauhaus batter. Everything needed is in its right place, for as long as it’s needed. Then it isn’t and we start again. It is a perfect economy of requirement, intent and movement. 

“It keeps me switched on somehow,” Petersen told Cricbuzz about his approach to batting. “It’s nice … well, not nice. But it does make me feel that I have to be there all the time, in the present. And I have to work for everything. That makes you appreciate it more.”

That’s not to say watching Petersen bat is dull. Anything but, because there’s a lot going on. It takes flinty intelligence to play like he does and not only survive but prosper. If you think properly about what you’re doing it will look easy. Even, or especially, when it isn’t. You can see Petersen’s smarts not only in the choices he makes, but in the modesty of his movements. He’s got this. The emotion comes after he has finally been dismissed. He and Bjorn Borg would have plenty to talk about.  

This comes from having played 97 first-class matches before you crack the nod. And from making your debut, in St Lucia in June, three months before your 28th birthday. It comes from having lived some life, and taking it to the middle with you. It’s the knowledge of what matters, and what doesn’t. And it never stops evolving.

“In the first Test [against India at Centurion, where he scored 15 and 17], I batted like I would in domestic cricket, and I thought success is just going to come. After that Test I knew I had to work harder than I usually do to get the runs. It made me realise that it’s a step up. You are playing against the best team in the world, and they don’t give you much. I had to work for every run.” If that makes it seem Petersen learnt a lot about his game during the series, prepare to be surprised: “Not really. I’m always going to be the same.”

He is no stranger to hard work. Since readmission in 1991, only seven players have waited longer — in terms of first-class caps — to earn a Test call-up for South Africa. Stephen Cook is at the top of the list with 165, and Stiaan van Zyl just behind Petersen with 96.

“I was fortunate to start playing first-class cricket when I was still a kid, fresh out of school [at 18, in February 2012],” Petersen said. “So there were guys ahead of me. I played with the previous generation and I played with a lot of guys. Like Jacques Kallis. His last game for the Cobras [in February 2014], I was part of that squad. It’s been a long time, but I wouldn’t have done it any differently. My journey has been my journey and it’s unique. Even though I had to learn my trade for longer, that’s fine. I’m happy it came when it came.”

The all-time record for a South African late bloomer is held by Peter Kirsten, who had played 270 first-class games by the time he walked onto Kensington Oval in Bridgetown on April 18, 1992 — less than a month before he turned 37 — as one of 10 debutants. The exception was the captain, Kepler Wessels, who had 24 Test caps for another team whose colours are green and gold. But that was, of course, different: apartheid, isolation, and all that. Speaking of that other green and gold side, Mike Hussey was 176 matches and 15,313 runs into his first-class career when he made his Test debut for Australia.

Some of Test cricket’s belated beginners stick it out at the top. Some who haven’t had to pay as many dues do not. Petersen is only five Tests in, and has scored three half-centuries, but it’s difficult to believe he will not be among those who last. He’s the business. It shows in the way he hasn’t been satisfied with being given his chance — he has taken it, too. That hasn’t been true for Zubayr Hamza, for instance, who has class to burn but was able to score only 181 runs in 10 Test innings in 2019 and 2020, and was dropped. Aiden Markram, too, plays like a dream. But he made just 76 in six innings against India and can consider himself fortunate to have been retained for next month’s series in New Zealand.

Of course Petersen isn’t immune to dips in performance. It took him only 10 innings to score a first-class century, but he needed another 19 trips to the crease to make his second. Four innings later, he scored an undefeated 225 — which he followed with centuries in his next two games. First, he had to find his way again; like he did after he came back from the West Indies series with 44 runs in three innings. How do struggling players return to form?    

“You’ve just got to go back to what what you learned when you were a kid, go back to the basics and hope that it will come right. Eventually it does. But you are going to fail. There’s no two ways about it.” How did he know when he was on song? “I don’t know. The scoreboard will tell me.”

There was no flippancy in that answer, just a sobering seriousness that was apparent in a different way when he joined the Zoom call for this interview: he did so three minutes earlier than the appointed time. Up popped an image far removed from the cauldron of Test cricket. Casually clad, he sat on a couch. Family photographs were on the wall behind him. Happily, the bio-bubble had burst and something like real life had flooded into the void. “It’s what we long for, just a bit of normality.” It’s never that simple for people in the news. We spoke three days after the end of the Test series. How many interviews had he given? “Since then? I’ve lost count.”

So he would be forgiven fuzziness on how he came to be stationed at leg slip after one delivery of the third day’s play at Newlands. Not a chance: “Dean [Elgar] is going to hate me for saying this, but it was my idea. I told him the ball before that. I’m like, maybe we should just have a leg slip. He thought about it and said, ‘Okay go.’ And then the very next ball it happened.”

Marco Jansen pitched the delivery on leg stump. Cheteshwar Pujara tried to deflect it downward, but the bounce undid him. Still, it needed a lightning dive and a stabbing right hand for the airborne, horizontal Petersen to take the catch. That’s what experience does: it reminds you, sometimes subliminally, about what has worked in the past. 

Pujara and Virat Kohli had come together the previous evening after India had slipped to 24/2 in their second innings. They had added 33, and built the lead to 70, when Petersen, sensing the import of the moment, pounced. “The game was in the balance at that time because we knew that they were the big wickets. We had to make a play somehow, and I just felt at the time, with Marco bowling … he’s uncomfortable to face for anyone. He’s tall, lanky, and he unsettles a lot of guys. So I just had a feeling that I had to be there at the time.”

Trusting that feeling is another matter, particularly in a match against the No. 1 ranked team with the series on the line. And it can’t be easy finding the confidence to speak up when you’re a junior member of the side. It good to know, then, that the seniors are listening. “We try and help out Dean wherever, because he can’t captain every point of the game. He’s a really open guy and he won’t just shrug you off. He takes all of our suggestions on board. So when someone has a gut feel, they speak out about it.”

Could that be happening at least partly because a team shorn of all of their established batting stars have internalised that the buck stops with whoever is at the crease? The last of the big names, Quinton de Kock, retired from Tests after Centurion. It’s as if those he left behind are playing for each other more than they did when they could rely on De Kock, Faf du Plessis, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Graeme Smith or Kallis to do more than their share of the heavy lifting. South Africa proved to themselves that they are more than the sum of their comparatively modest parts by rallying to win at the Wanderers and at Newlands. “The odds were against us, so that makes the victory taste more sweet. When ‘Quinny’ retired nobody expected it. We will miss him, but cricket goes on.”

It helps, no doubt, that what might be termed a likebloodymindedness prevails among the frontline batters. So it isn’t difficult to connect the dots between Elgar, Petersen, Rassie van der Dussen and Temba Bavuma. They share a brand of defiance that puts lumps in even the most jaded throats, and that doesn’t have to spark centuries to get the job done. This is as close to socialism as cricket gets, as epitomised by Van der Dussen grinding out an unbeaten 41 off 95 balls and in two-and-a-half hours to steer South Africa home in the deciding Test. “The 20s, 30s and 40s Rassie scored were massive for us,” Petersen said. “I think he’ll remember those innings better than his hundreds by the end of his career.”

There was more where that came from: “We’ve got strong characters in our changeroom. South Africans don’t just go away and die. We fight for what we believe in and we are very strong. Our captain is an extremely strong character and is the perfect guy to lead this group right now because it’s what this team and this country longs for. And we needed this win, to be dead honest.”

Petersen spoke from his father’s house in Paarl, where he spent a few days after the series. Dirkie Petersen, no mean player himself, was his son’s most important coach during his formative years and remains a valued source of advice and encouragement. But he has yet to see his prized pupil play a Test first-hand, what with the first two in the Caribbean and, because of the BCCI’s pandemic fears, spectators not being allowed during the India series. That had an upside.

“My dad is a nervous character, so he doesn’t really want to come watch. Because he goes crazy. But I’m glad I haven’t score a hundred yet because I’d like him to be there when it does happen.”

There is, as there is in everything Petersen does on a cricket ground, plenty in those few words: honesty about his father’s disposition, but a desire to please him nonetheless. And there’s this — when Petersen scores a century. Not if. Seriously.  

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Here be South Africa’s giants

“It’s been a challenging period for the team; for players, for particular members of management.” – Temba Bavuma

Telford Vice | Cape Town

SOME people look at Temba Bavuma and see a cricketer. Others see a South African. Still others see a black South African cricketer. Kevin Pietersen famously said it isn’t easy being him. He should try being Bavuma.

Particularly at a time when the world outside the dressing room seems to be trying to destroy much of what Bavuma and his teammates have achieved in recent months. So there was no surprise when a bent question about how easy or difficult it might be to captain South Africa met with a straight answer.   

“There’s a lot of dynamics that you need to manage,” Bavuma told an online press conference at Newlands on Sunday. “For me the biggest thing is trying to keep cricket the main focus amongst the guys. I hate to bring this up but it’s been a challenging period for the team; for players, for particular members of management. There’s been a lot of scrutiny surrounding the team and the organisation.

“To manage the conversations that happen within the changing room, to ensure that our energies are 100% geared towards performing out there, that’s been the biggest challenge. It’s been a big responsibility but it’s also been a privilege. It’s not easy leading a South African national team.”

The unmentioned rhino in the room was Mark Boucher, whose disciplinary hearing on charges of gross misconduct is set to start on Wednesday. Boucher stands accused of nothing less than racism, that, if proven, could end his international coaching career — which after a damp start and a slow gathering of momentum, has caught fire in the shape of Test and ODI series victories against an India team who came to South Africa as outright favourites.

But those successes cannot stand in the way of justice being done. If Boucher is found guilty, there must be consequences. If he is considered guilty enough to warrant being fired, that must happen. If he is guilty but not terminally so, he will be deserving of a lesser sentence. If he is acquitted, so be it. In any eventuality, his record as a coach and what he might yet achieve in that capacity must not come into the equation.

CSA’s board are divided on the issue. The remnants of the chronically dysfunctional structure, replaced in June by a majority independent board, are adamant Boucher must go. The rest either support Boucher or are taking the objective view and putting their trust in the disciplinary process. It’s difficult to imagine the players aren’t also conflicted. Some no doubt won’t understand why he is in trouble. Others will want the matter cleared up, one way or the other, at the hearing and for this damaging darkness to go away.

The external tensions over Boucher, which have sparked ever more shrill and outrageous dialogue, for and against, on social media, make Bavuma all the more worthy of praise. Having delivered two half-centuries and three unbeaten knocks in the Test series, in which he topped the averages, he scored a century in the first ODI. The responsibility of hanging tough in the Test team’s batting order against India — he featured in four of South Africa’s nine half-century stands in the series — and of leading the ODI side would seem to have enhanced Bavuma’s own game.

“I enjoy captaincy, and I guess that is the knock-off benefit that it has — it seems to have shown in my own performances,” he said. “With captaincy there’s a lot of thinking. I enjoy the tactical side of things. That flows into your own performance. I’m clearer as to what I’m trying to do. I’m always trying to assess the situation and come up with solutions and plan how to counter those situations.”

Bavuma’s ODI side not only played well, they played as if they had their eyes on a higher prize. And as if they were a happy team. How much of the credit for that belongs to Boucher? How much to Bavuma? And how much to a pair of leaders who, despite their obvious and less than obvious differences, have plenty in common?

We cannot know. But we do know that captain and coach were on the same page after South Africa squeaked to a four-run win in Cape Town on Sunday to seal a whitewash in the ODI series. “We wanted to win 3-0,” Boucher told an online press conference. “We’ve been through the hard times, and only once you’ve done that do you appreciate the good times. So we will appreciate this, but our feet will be firmly on the ground. Because this is just the journey of this team so far. We’ve got a captain in ‘Tems’ who is really demanding about results, which is good.”

South Africa were averaging a touch more than a run-a-ball an over when Jasprit Bumrah had Quinton de Kock caught in the deep for 124 in the 36th over. They didn’t score as many as six runs an over for the rest of their innings, and lost their last seven wickets for 73. Then, with India reduced to 195/5 in the 38th over in pursuit of a target of 288, Deepak Chahar arrived to hammer 54 off 34 and narrow the gap between the teams to a sliver.

“Today we let it slip with the bat,” Boucher said. “We got a speed wobble trying to go too hard too early and we were probably 25 runs short. Then, when we had the game sort of won with the ball, maybe we took our foot off the gas.

That South Africa prevailed came down to the bounce of the ball. Or did it? “It’s nice to learn these lessons while you’re winning,” Boucher said. “On another day we probably wouldn’t have been given the opportunity to get back into the game. When things are not going for you, you tend to lose games like that. When it’s going for you, and you’ve got confidence behind you, winning games like that is special.”

The people who win them, on and off the field, have to be special, too. When you look at them, you’re seeing giants.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Imperfect De Kock’s perfect game

“He’s got a daughter now, who he’s probably looking forward to getting back to. That puts life into perspective.” – Mark Boucher on Quinton de Kock.

Telford Vice | Newlands

THERE were no mad dogs and precious few Englishmen about, but too many others went out in the pre and post midday sun for their own good at Newlands on Sunday. Quinton de Kock, for instance, batted for nine minutes short of three hours and then kept wicket for close on four hours.

That added up to more than six-and-a-half hours of daring the weather to undo you on one of the hottest weekends the Western Cape has yet experienced. And that, mind, in long trousers and long sleeves, much of the time wearing a helmet, and all of the time in gloves. At least, if we’re looking for positives, De Kock was in minimal danger of sunburn.

In time terms he was at the crease for a mite more than 70% of South Africa’s innings and, of course, for all of India’s. Of the 595 fair deliveries that constituted the match, De Kock was involved, in some way or another, for 426 of them. That level of fortitude, along with his 124, the fact that he neither dropped a catch nor missed a stumping, and didn’t concede a single bye culminated in, to borrow from baseball, a perfect game. 

Infamously, De Kock abandoned his Test career after the first match of India’s tour, at Centurion — where the visitors won. How would South Africa cope without their only remaining proven world class batter? Just fine, as things turned out. They won at the Wanderers in rousing fashion and, less dramatically in the fresh knowledge that they could do it but just as solidly, at Newlands to claim the Test series. The ODI rubber was in the bag after the first two ODIs, on Wednesday and Friday in Paarl. That marked the first time India had lost four matches on one tour to South Africa. Sunday’s win — by four runs, with the Indians dismissed for 283 with four balls left in the match — earned the South Africans five consecutive victories for the first time since they beat Sri Lanka 5-0 in a home ODI series in March 2019. 

Until No. 7 Deepak Chahar — playing his first match of the series, which showed in a good way — set about his 34-ball 54 on Sunday, the Indians had looked about as keen to play the ODIs as they might anticipating a dental appointment. Who could blame them: as the matches did not carry World Cup Super League points, it’s as if they didn’t exist. Or shouldn’t have existed. The South Africans, buoyed by the wave of their unexpected success over the world No. 1 team in the Tests, almost couldn’t stop continuing to win.

De Kock made 78 on Friday, which was even hotter than Sunday, and his performance in the third match had much to do with his team being able to complete a whitewash. On Wednesday, De Kock had looked primed for bigger things when R Ashwin cut him off at 27 by rattling his off stump with an arm-ball. But no-one piled up more runs in the series than De Kock: 229 at an average of 76.33 and a strike rate of 96.62. That and the ice-cool Andile Phehlukwayo, who finished as the rubber’s top wicket-taker with six, and at the leading average of 18.33, did more than anything to seal the deal.

As if he has never been away, much less missed being part of two epic Test triumphs, De Kock returned and opened a tap of runs. He played with childlike abandon; like we all do. In our dreams. There’s something about the huntin’, fishin’, outdoorsy kid he will always be in his follow-through; his bat laying long and languid down his back. We saw a lot of that in these three games.

And it was good to see. Cricket is chronically short on adults, on people who take responsibility not only for their own lives but also for those of their nearest and dearest. De Kock’s decision to stop playing Tests because, as he explained, he was becoming a father put him among the grown ups in the dressing room. That he has been able to come back to at least part of the world he knew, and do so emphatically well, and be the boy he used to be into the bargain, is his reward.

“If you look at ‘Quinny’ as a person, when he’s freed his mind up that’s probably when he plays his best cricket,” Mark Boucher told an online press conference. “It was great to see him come out and play the way that we all know ‘Quinny’ can play; the way that he has been when he’s at his best. He’s got that sort of freedom about his game. You can’t have all six of your batters play like that, but you can certainly have one or two. On their day, if they score a hundred, more often than not they’re going to win you a game.

“It’s great to see ‘Quinny’ back and smiling again. He’s got a daughter now, who he’s probably looking forward to getting back to. That puts life into perspective, as a lot of people who are dads will know.”

Perspective. Boucher knows all about that after a week in which he was served with papers for a disciplinary hearing starting on Wednesday on charges that could cost him his job. Coming so soon after he had helped his team win the Test series, and before the start of the ODIs — but years after his victim, Paul Adams, had been racially abused by the language of a dressing room song sung by a team that included Boucher — the sweetness of Sunday’s win would have been tinged with bitterness. Or had it?

“I think you’ll appreciate I can’t answer that,” Boucher said. “Not now, in any case.” Maybe he will once it’s all over and his fate is known. Maybe once the whole picture is painted, not just edited to suit whichever narrative. Maybe when he knows what it feels like to be a boy again. Maybe once mad dogs and Englishmen stop going out in the midday sun.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Boucher heads into murky racism storm

“CSA suspends Boucher and Smith” – the damagingly erroneous headline on CSA’s release was a glimpse of the divisions in the game.

Telford Vice | Paarl

CSA have no belief in Mark Boucher and are trying to fire him on charges of racism. It’s there in black and white, twice, in the charge sheet that will be used in his disciplinary hearing that is set to start on Wednesday.

Here’s page two of seven: “[CSA] will contend that the nature of your misconduct is gross and of such a serious nature to warrant termination of your employment. And page six: “Your conduct has resulted in an irretrievable breakdown in the trust relationship between you and CSA. In the circumstances, the sanction of dismissal will be sought before the chairperson of the disciplinary enquiry.”

This would be the same Mark Boucher who, last Friday, guided South Africa to a famous Test series victory over India with a team in which black and brown players are flourishing. And the same Mark Boucher who has recently been praised for his work as a coach by Lungi Ngidi, Rassie van der Dussen and Farhaan Behardien. Not for the first time, the suits and the players are not nearly on the same page.

But this is also the same Mark Boucher who was among the South Africa players who, the Social Justice and Nation-Building (SJN) project heard, called Paul Adams “brown shit” in a dressing room song during their mutual playing days. Boucher admitted as much and apologised, but only in writing. Had he taken the chance he had to appear at the SJN in person, or at least online, he would have been able to present himself as a contrite, fallible human being who was the product of a shockingly damaged society. Instead, he sent a cold, dry lawyer’s letter riddled with weasel words. It has now been used against him.

The SJN report failed utterly to provide a roadmap for progress. Instead it passed the buck and recommended that Boucher and Graeme Smith, CSA’s director of cricket, be investigated. Even if the SJN hadn’t made that limp suggestion — wasn’t that SJN itself’s role in all this? — CSA did not have the option of ignoring what had been uncovered at the hearings. To do nothing would have been to condone by silence serious allegations and admissions. There is never a convenient time to deal with racism, but dealt with it must be. That is more true in South Africa than in any other country.

Even so, some of the SJN’s findings on Smith, in particular, were blighted by damaging leaps of assumption. For instance, Smith’s refusal, before his appointment in December 2019, to report to former CSA chief executive Thabang Moroe, along with his stated lack of trust in the previous board, were held up as “[evincing] his racial bias against black leadership at CSA”.

Moroe was a wrecking ball of an administrator, and consequently fired. The board resigned in disgrace after years of governance catastrophes. That Smith insisted on keeping his distance from these malignant entities is commendable. For the SJN not to recognise that raises serious questions about its own integrity and its understanding of its purpose. Besides, Smith has been working with acting chief executive Pholetsi Moseki — who is black — since December 2020, and with a majority black and brown board for his entire tenure.

But that wasn’t the only charge made about Smith and, as per the SJN’s recommendation, action against him is expected to be unveiled in the coming days. As he is an independent contractor, unlike full-time employee Boucher, that could mean arbitration rather than the bigger stick being wielded at his former teammate.

So how was it that the release that heralded Boucher’s disciplinary hearing was originally headlined: “CSA suspends Boucher and Smith”? That statement was soon withdrawn, only to reappear without change except for the headline — “CSA appoints highly respected advocate Terry Motau (SC) chairperson of disciplinary hearing into allegations into Mark Boucher”. 

Asked why “suspends” and “Smith” appeared on top of a statement that mentioned neither, Thamie Mthembu, CSA’s head of communications, told Cricbuzz that “this is an unforgivable error”, that “we have investigated and it is clear to us that one of the writers used a previous template that was never intended for release and then saved the new document as such”, and that “the document should have been saved as per the headline on the document”.

That a “previous template” in CSA’s system was titled “CSA suspends Boucher and Smith” — that it even existed — should ring loud alarms. It is an inkling into the division that infects every facet of the game. It is common knowledge that factions within CSA have been dead set against the appointment of Smith, who as per his mandate hired Boucher, since he started work: some 17 months before the SJN hearings started.

Had the first headline never appeared, this story wouldn’t have been anything like this long. That it needs all this explaining and context means cricket may not have rid itself of its delinquent denizens. Because unwarranted, damaging headlines like “CSA suspends Boucher and Smith” cannot be honest mistakes. They have to be unleashed by design — to misinform, to mislead, to divide and, perchance, to rule again in Machiavellian style.

Indeed, even though the board has been restructured to feature a majority of independent directors, some of the dinosaurs of cricket’s decades of rampant cronyism have survived. A minority of board members, in the words of one source, “hate [Boucher] with a passion” — hence, perhaps, the escalation of what was originally billed as an investigation into a potentially career-ending disciplinary hearing. Another minority are “vocally in his favour”. Still another, more objective, minority want the process to run its course fully and fairly. 

So, not every board member wants Boucher sacked. But, as a collective, that’s what the board have signed off on. And, despite the ominous wording of the charge sheet, Motau could decide Boucher is guilty and not sack him. He could, for instance, slap him with a letter of warning and order him to undergo anti-racism training.

Boucher was furnished, privately, with the charge sheet on Monday. The news that he would be on the carpet was broken on Thursday, prompting CSA to release their clanger of a headline. It wasn’t long before the charge sheet itself was doing the rounds.

In it, Boucher is accused of “historically repeatedly used racist and/or offensive and/or inappropriate nicknames regarding a Proteas team-mate; and/or having had your racist and/or offensive and/or inappropriate utterances drawn to your attention, you failed to adequately and/or sufficiently and/or appropriately apologise for these utterances and/or acknowledge the racist nature of these utterances and/or hurt that they caused.”

Curiously, “When dealing with the Black Lives Matter issue and the question of ‘taking the knee’, you allegedly dealt with the white players’ concerns and requested that the team manager (who is black) deal with the black players’ concerns.” Consequently, “This allegedly created or exacerbated division and alienated players and the team.” It also meant Boucher drew for himself the short straw of talking to players who had refused to kneel: all the members of the squad who didn’t were white. He himself had been taking a knee since before the board ordered all to do so. 

Boucher also “allegedly did not formalise any documented ‘roles and responsibilities’ or meaningful KPIs [key performance indicators] for the assistant coach, Enoch Nkwe”, who is black — and resigned unhappily in August. Boucher “allegedly did not provide any specific or sufficiently specific and defined role for Mr Nkwe and no ‘personal development plans’ were documented or implemented for Mr Nkwe” and “you allegedly treated Mr Nkwe in a manner unbecoming of a leader in your position”. This situation must be remedied. Nkwe is too intelligent and too valuable a coach and figure of excellence to be lost to cricket.  

Wednesday will be the first step in what could be a protracted business of he said, he said. Boucher will take the team to New Zealand early next month with this saga hanging over his head, where it promises to be for months to come.

He could well win the battle, and he won’t be declared its biggest loser. That sorry status is reserved for those South Africans who thought they knew black from white, and how to tell the difference.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa sizzle, India melt in Paarl’s kitchen

“I’m critical but stable.” – Janneman Malan after batting in the winelands’ heat.

Telford Vice | Paarl

SPICY steak burgers for lunch. Fancy an egg with that? No problem: we’ll use the edge of a bat to crack one onto the pitch and fry it. Won’t take longer than Temba Bavuma needs to dash a single. Yes, it was that hot in Paarl on Friday. 

As a blazing morning sank into a menacing afternoon, smoke rose beyond the ground from what must have been a bush fire. It disappeared into the blowtorch blue sky like a departing soul. The heat made everyday activities like eating and drinking feel unnatural. You were too scared to blink because your eyelids might melt together, and stay like that. From that you might deduce that thinking boiled the brain to mush.

But the umpires didn’t fall over, the scorers were able to count as unfailingly as ever, and the press did what they always did: not a lot. Even so, as the day reached peak unpleasantness at 39ºC, one among the latter — not of Cricbuzz’ parish — needed rehydration and medical attention, complete with blood and electrocardiogram tests. Happily, a clean bill of health was returned. Even, no doubt to the surprise of some, a heartbeat. There was, however, concern about the ink in the veins.

Despite all that, South Africa and India delivered 98.1 overs of cricket with what looked like their usual vigour. Bowlers charged in and bowled, batters hit and ran, fielders, chased and stopped and turned and threw. How?

“It felt way hotter than two days ago [during the first match of the series, which South Africa won by 31 runs],” Janneman Malan told an online press conference. “It’s always a challenge for the body to field and bat in conditions like these, but that’s what we work for and do conditioning for. I’m glad we could meet that challenge.”

He did that better than most, clipping a cool 91 before he gloved Jasprit Bumrah onto his stumps with South Africa steaming towards victory. Malan batted for more than two-and-a-half hours; longer than anyone else. “Maybe if I batted through I would have felt a sniper bullet in the leg,” he said, referring to the likelihood of cramp setting in. “I’m critical but stable.” 

Too often here in the civilian ranks we are blasé about the extraordinariness of the elite cricketer. Friday in Paarl, a day when pans were surplus to the equipment needed to fry eggs, was a reality check. Elite or not, in the mercifully air-conditioned dressing room after India’s innings, players took ice baths and some were fed what a South Africa team management source called “slowmag slushies”. 

While those went down, maybe some of the conversation would have been around Mark Boucher’s impending disciplinary hearing over allegations of racist conduct. Was there extra motivation to play for the popular but under-fire coach? “Every time we go out and play, we play for the team and everyone in the team and in the country as well,” Malan said. “That’s the responsibility we have. Nothing’s changed from that side. I don’t know how every individual felt, but we did our best to play for the team and the country.” Did the news, which broke on Thursday, hang over the match? “I don’t want to sound ignorant or uninterested, but it’s a big series so we can’t have many distractions in terms of personal mindsets. I just try to focus on the game.”   

Ah, focus. The amount of the stuff required to bat properly against quality bowling is immense at the best of times. On Friday, what with the political and actual weather, it would have been exponentially greater. Errors committed by bowlers, fielders, umpires, scorers and reporters don’t remove those pieces of the puzzle of a cricket match. But get it wrong at the crease and you’re likely to have to spend the rest of the innings stewing in your own frustration. Or, in Friday’s case, in your own juices. No-one is going to accept steepling temperatures as a mitigating factor.

So there should be a different level of appreciation for those who not only were in the middle long enough to make a difference, but to make it look as if they were batting on just another day against just another attack. Criticism of KL Rahul taking 79 balls to score 55 can go somewhere the sun don’t shine like it does in Paarl. Likewise can we all calm down about Virat Kohli’s limp drive to cover to record his 14th duck in 247 ODI innings? And show some respect for players as unlikeminded as Rahul and Rishabh Pant — who made a career-best 85 off 71 — holding it together well enough to share 111. Off 115 balls? Brilliant, all things considered. 

Save some love, too, for Malan’s effort, Quinton de Kock’s 78, and their run-a-ball stand of 132. And, not least, for Aiden Markram. Two balls before he and Rassie van der Dussen overhauled India’s 287/6, with seven wickets standing and 11 deliveries unbowled, Markram was at the non-striker’s end.

As Bhuvneshwar Kumar walked back to his mark, Markram, who has endured a torrid time against the Indians, scoring 76 runs in six innings in the Test series and four on Wednesday, sank to his haunches. By then he had been in the furnace for an hour; long enough to face 40 balls and score 36, and long enough to feel as if that was more than enough.

Van der Dussen defended the last delivery of that over. Back on strike with one to get to win the match and clinch the series with a game to spare, Markram mustered his resolve to face Shreyas Iyer. A punch to mid-off yielded a scamper for an ambitious single. And a dive, because a direct hit might have caused problems. Scampering! Diving! In this heat! For no good reason considering David Miller was padded up with Andile Phehlukwayo to come! Who did Markram think he was?!

A professional. A proud and dedicated professional. And neither fried nor scrambled.

First published by Cricbuzz. 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Markram can only watch Bavuma, Van der Dussen show

“I didn’t notice much of a difference.” – Rassie van der Dussen on whether playing against India when they’re not captained by Virat Kohli is more pleasant.

Telford Vice | Paarl

REMEMBER Aiden Markram? It seems he doesn’t. Would the Markram who batted for more than five-and-a-half hours to score 108 in the Rawalpindi Test last February, or who hit 96 off 90 balls in an ODI in Colombo in September, drive directly to mid-off and set off on a suicide single?

He did, of course, in the first ODI against India in Paarl on Wednesday. He was, of course, run out: for four off 11 balls. It was, of course, a surprise to see him named in the XI considering the 76 runs in six innings at 12.66 he had scored in the Test series.

South Africa’s other players who used all their available trips to the crease, Keegan Petersen, Dean Elgar, Temba Bavuma and Rassie van der Dussen, scored 276, 235, 221 and 117 runs. Bavuma’s average, 73.66, was almost six times as high as Markram’s.

All elegance and thoughtfulness, Markram always looks like a million dollars in pads. That he can play at this level is not in dispute. Similarly, no-one doubts that he will find his way back to himself. He is too good a player not to, and a modest, decent, thoroughly good bloke on top of that. But, right now, as a batter, he is a liability.

A measure of the low standing in which he is currently held was had late in the day when, with South Africa wending their way towards victory by 31 runs, David Miller dropped a simple catch in the covers. Up went the cry among the watching groundstaff: “Markram! Come on, man!”        

So why was Markram sent once more unto the breach he has not crossed since his 25-ball 52 not out against England in Sharjah in November during South Africa’s valiant but unsuccessful last throw of the dice to reach the knockout rounds of the T20 World Cup, or eight international innings ago? Picking him as an additional bowling option only adds insult to injury.

He might have been asking himself that question as he exited stage left after his dismissal on Wednesday, dragging his soul back to another creakingly quiet dressing room. Where all he could do was watch Bavuma and Van der Dussen show him how it should be done.

Bavuma’s 110, his second century in 13 innings in the format, was a smooth cruise of an innings; an inexorable progression to the promised land. Van der Dussen’s undefeated 129, also his second ton and his career-best score in his 24th innings, was more aggressive; an answer to the questions that have swirled about him.  

The 204 runs they shared off 184 balls was the highest stand for South Africa’s fourth wicket in ODIs against India, the second-biggest fourth-wicket partnership against India by anyone, and South Africa’s 16th-highest stand for any wicket.    

That Bavuma should have succeeded made sense. He was a bristling, brooding presence at the crease in the Test series, when conditions didn’t allow for flowing strokeplay. Nevertheless, he found ways to score consistently. The slowness of Wednesday’s pitch presented a different challenge. He met it with industriousness, inventiveness and intelligence. His confidence allowed him to work the ball around the ground rather than go after bold shots. It was a performance equal parts belief and been there, done that. And it was exactly what was needed from a captain and a major batter.

Van der Dussen spent the Tests batting like a man in conflict with himself, as if his head, heart and body were determined to take him in different directions. That he nonetheless managed to deliver important runs at important times was a tribute to his strength of character. He seemed to celebrate the dissipation of that pressure, playing with a level of freedom that helped him hit all four of South Africa’s sixes. When Van der Dussen is on song, his bat makes an arresting gunshot crack as the ball screams away scolded. It has been an uncommon sound these past few weeks, but not on Wednesday.

Bavuma and Van der Dussen righted South Africa from the 68/3 they listed to when Markram got himself out and put them on course for a total of 296/4, the fourth highest in the 15 ODIs played at this ground. India threatened to overhaul it while Shikhar Dhawan and Virat Kohli were putting on 92. Then they lost 5/33 inside nine overs, and were marooned on 265/8 to slip to a hattrick of losses in South Africa for the first time since they were beaten in three ODIs on the bounce in November 2006. Thereby hangs another tale, albeit obliquely.

Before this match, Kohli had been India’s captain in some format or another — or all three — in precisely half of his 500 international innings. No. 501 marked the first time since November 2016 that that was not the case. And it showed. He kept an unnervingly low profile in the field, like a ghost of captains past. Was it more enjoyable playing against an India team not led by the combative, vocal, emotional Kohli? “I didn’t notice much of a difference,” Van der Dussen told an online press conference.

Kohli’s batting was more like Bavuma’s run-gathering than the pyrotechnic peacocking we have come to expect of him. He left that kind of thing to Dhawan, whose 84-ball 79 was his first half-century in six white-ball innings. Kohli, by contrast, ran 39 of his 51. It’s not meant as an insult to label his effort workmanlike, but that’s what it was.

Given the pitch and the 33ºC heat, it wasn’t a good day to be a bowler or in the field. More so if you were one of India’s players. Or Markram.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

When Temba met ‘Quinny’. Again …

“‘Quinny’ will have a point to prove.” – Temba Bavuma

Telford Vice | Cape Town

YOU enter what you thought was an empty lift, and there they are: your ex-partner. The break-up was complicated, but life without them has been better than expected. And now this, an awful, awkward silence even as words loudly bounce around the inside of your head.

But Temba Bavuma gave nothing away, offering only the slightest half-smile when he was asked whether the return of Quinton de Kock to South Africa’s dressing room for the ODI series against India had been awkward.

“We obviously miss him as a Test team, but he has made his decision and that’s a decision we respect,” Bavuma told an online press conference on Tuesday. “Having ‘Quinny’ again within the team, it’s been good. And knowing ‘Quinny’ … I don’t want to put words in his mouth but he will have a point to prove, and I am sure he is as excited as we are to see him in the team.”

De Kock shocked his teammates and the cricket world when, at 29, he ended his Test career, citing family reasons most prominently, on December 30 — the same day India beat South Africa by 113 runs at Centurion in the first match of the rubber.

India went into the series as the No. 1 ranked team with South Africa at No. 6. De Kock made his debut in February 2014, during South Africa’s 39 months at No. 1 — interrupted for three months by Australia — from August 2012 to January 2016. De Kock’s six centuries and 22 half-centuries in 54 Tests were instrumental in his team’s success.

But a funny thing happened on South Africa’s way to an apparently inevitable crash to their first series defeat to India at home, which surely should have been more crushing without De Kock: they won, prevailing by seven wickets inside four days at the Wanderers and Newlands. They showed superb stability on difficult pitches in both fourth innings to reel in challenging targets of 240 and 212. Doubtless De Kock would have helped South Africa win still more emphatically. But there is widespread relief and joy that they were able to do so despite his absence.

Bavuma scored two half-centuries in six innings and topped the averages with 73.66. He hopes to stay on that path: “The Test series went well for the team but also for me personally. My feet seemed to move well and I was hitting the ball well. I have another opportunity again tomorrow [in the first ODI in Paarl]. People have asked me if there’s anything I’ve changed or done differently. To be honest, no. I’ve been doing things the same way. Maybe it’s just a period of good form. That said, tomorrow is tomorrow. I’m not going to dwell too much on what’s happened in the past.”

That said, he will want the booming belief generated by what happened in Johannesburg and Cape Town to rub off on the team he will captain in the ODIs: nine members of his squad played in the Tests.

“Momentum is a real thing,” Bavuma said. “After going down in the first Test, we managed to get some momentum at the Wanderers and it carried us through the whole series. Obviously, it’s a different format, a different skill set, and a different type of pressure. But from a momentum and confidence point of view, that’s well within the team’s grasp and we’ll be relying on that to help inspire the other guys.” 

Among the stars of the Test series was Marco Jansen, who was a surprise debutant at Centurion, played all three matches, took 19 wickets at 16.47, and has been included in the ODI squad. “The world has seen what cricketing abilities he has and his x-factor ability,” Bavuma said. “It was a no-brainer to get him into the white-ball squad and to see his skilled display there. He will come strongly into contention when we speak about the team.”

He will. As surely as Bavuma has burnished his credentials as a defiant, dependable fighter for the cause, and De Kock has been welcomed back into the fold. Who says this lift can’t go to the top floor?

First published by Cricbuzz. 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

No points, but don’t lose the subplot

“Whether we want to go with a batter or an allrounder at No. 6, that’s the conversation that needs to happen.” – Temba Bavuma

Telford Vice | Cape Town

AFTER a Test series for the ages, particularly from the South African perspective, the prospect of three ODIs that do not carry World Cup Super League (WCSL) points is, well, meh. But the subplots starring two diminishing giants should lend the rubber some interest and gravitas.

Quinton de Kock went into the first Test as his team’s only proven world class batter. Virat Kohli arrived as India’s captain in that format. Neither of those statements remains valid. De Kock abruptly retired from Tests after the Centurion match, and Kohli stepped down in the wake of South Africa’s series-clinching win at Newlands on Friday. Both will be under intense scrutiny when the ODIs start in Paarl on Wednesday. It only adds to the narrative that they are the only players across both squads who are in the top 10 batting rankings.

Will De Kock’s mind be on the game, or on the daughter his partner gave birth to — their first child — on January 6? Will Kohli play with the freedom that comes with having ditched the cares of captaincy? The Paarl pitch, which is generally better for batting than bowling, should allow those questions to be answered.

But the rest of the conditions equation will not be as benign. Apparently, the thermometer in Janneman Malan’s car read 45ºC when he drove to training last week. Wednesday’s forecast is for clear skies and 33ºC. Even so, South Africa’s practice session on Tuesday was cancelled because of rain — a rarity in summer in the Western Cape.

Having topped the averages in the Test series, Temba Bavuma will be keen to continue in that vein. And to take back the wheel of leadership, which he relinquished in September when a fielder’s throw broke his thumb while he was batting in an ODI in Colombo. KL Rahul, who is minding India’s captaincy until Rohit Sharma gets over a hamstring injury, was one of only two centurions in the Tests, which were played on challenging pitches. He should find Wednesday’s surface better for run-scoring.  

South Africa have released Kagiso Rabada from their squad — and added George Linde — and might be tempted to rest Marco Jansen. Rabada and Jansen each bowled more than 100 overs in the Test series. But Lungi Ngidi, who bowled 83.4, will probably be in action on Wednesday. Jasprit Bumrah, the only India bowler in the ODI squad who topped 100 overs in the Tests, seems unlikely to be given a break — not least because he is the highest ranked bowler in either squad at No. 7.

South Africa have won only three of their last eight completed ODIs since their series in India in March 2020 suffered a washout in the first games at Dharamsala and had the other two matches postponed for pandemic reasons. Also since then, India have won five of their nine games in the format. That the series has been moved to South Africa accounts for the fact that no WCSL points are up for grabs.

Essentially, that makes it a second-tier affair. Even if that wasn’t the case, it would be difficult to imagine the series reaching the levels of drama we saw in the Tests. If it does, we’re in for some cracking cricket.

When: Wednesday, 10.30am Local Time

Where: Boland Park, Paarl 

What to expect: Hot, flat, slow. And a sad silence where the happy clamour of the country’s warmest, most festive crowd might have been.

Team news:

South Africa: Temba Bavuma is set to return in the format after an absence of more than four months. That said, he has missed only three ODIs. South Africa are likely to deploy two spinners. 

Possible XI: Quinton de Kock, Janneman Malan, Temba Bavuma (capt), Rassie van der Dussen, David Miller, Wayne Parnell, Andile Phehlukwayo, Keshav Maharaj, Sisanda Magala, Lungi Ngidi, Tabraiz Shamsi  

India: KL Rahul, who has had a fair bit of success in India’s middle order in the last couple of years, is set to open alongside Shikhar Dhawan in the absence of Rohit Sharma. With the Indian team management believing that there’ll be assistance for the spinners, India might play two slow bowlers. 

Possible XI: KL Rahul (capt), Shikhar Dhawan, Virat Kohli, Rishabh Pant, Shreyas Iyer, Venkatesh Iyer, Shardul Thakur, R Ashwin, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Jasprit Bumrah, Yuzvendra Chahal

What they said:

“Quinton and Janneman have done fairly well so I don’t see that changing. I come back into the picture at No.3. Then it’s the middle order — whether we want to go with an extra batter or an allrounder at No. 6. That’s the real conversation that needs to happen.” — Temba Bavuma lets us into his thinking about the make-up of South Africa’s XI. 

“Under Virat, team India have done some phenomenal things. We’ve won series outside India, something that hasn’t been done before. We’ve gone in every country and won a series. He has done a lot of things right and set a standard for all of us and team India. As a team, and for me, it’s all about building on that. We obviously know what it takes to be a champion team. We’ve got to keep improving and stay as disciplined and as determined as that, and go out and enjoy our cricket. Virat had this amazing ability to get the best out of everybody. He pushed everybody and made us believe that we could do special things. That’s something that I’ve learned from him and hopefully I can do that with the team as well.” — KL Rahul on filling the biggest boots in cricket.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Dr Jansen and Mr Marco

“We are good friends but sometimes on the field things get heated.” – Marco Jansen on his confrontation with Jasprit Bumrah.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

CRICKET grounds do strange things to people. Some use them as personality mirrors: they see themselves in full only in the middle. To others they are ego boosters: they are who they were before they crossed the boundary, only more so. To Marco Jansen, the cricket ground is where he goes to be someone else.

“I am a bit of an introvert, but when I’m on the field that’s the one place where I want to express myself,” Jansen said in material released by CSA on Monday. “Especially playing the sport that I love, the sport I’ve wanted to play since I was a child. All those emotions just show the passion and love I have for the game. If there is one place where I feel I can show my passion and emotions, it’s on the field.”

Jansen’s first language is Afrikaans. But that’s not the only reason his speaking voice in English is barely above a baritone whisper. You can hear him mulling and measuring every word before he allows it into the world. He gives the glory of what he has done not to himself but to God. He would seem to be the epitome of humility and cautiousness.

But he showed plenty of passion and emotion in the Test series against India. He made a surprise debut in the first Test at Centurion ahead of Duanne Olivier — who was building up his bowling loads in the wake of recovering from Covid-19 — and did well enough to keep his place for the other two matches.

The 21-year-old, 2.09-metre tall, left-arm fast bowler finished the rubber with 19 wickets — one behind series leader Kagiso Rabada — at an average of 16.47, a touch behind Lungi Ngidi’s 15.00. He also scored only 16 fewer runs than Aiden Markram in two fewer innings than the opener. Most importantly, he announced himself as a quality quick, all booming bounce and awkward angles, and a cutthroat competitor.

We saw plenty of the latter at the Wanderers, where Jansen’s response to serving as a target for the India fast bowlers’ bouncers was to engage Jasprit Bumrah physically and verbally. First he hit Bumrah on the shoulder with consecutive deliveries. Then he let loose a stream of invective, which caused Bumrah to lose his rag. He hacked a catch to point off Ngidi 16 balls later.

The incident proved a precursor to India’s emotional meltdown in the third Test at Newlands, where Virat Kohli, R Ashwin and KL Rahul were undone mentally by a DRS decision that reversed Dean Elgar’s leg-before dismissal by Ashwin. Their immature antics included screaming allegations of cheating by the broadcasters — who have no control over DRS — into the stump microphone. The unseemly tantrum marked a turning point: South Africa scored 41 runs in the remaining nine overs of the day, having scored only 19 in the nine overs preceding that moment. The next day they won by seven wickets to seal a 2-1 series triumph over the No. 1 ranked team, and to retain their unbeaten record against India at home.

Jansen was an important part of that success story: “I hoped to do well but I didn’t expect to do that well. They haven’t won a series in our conditions, and I’m glad we kept it that way.”

Things didn’t look like panning out that way on the first day of the series, when flaccid bowling allowed India to cruise to 272/3. Jansen’s contribution to that sorry story was 17 overs in which he went wicketless for 61, and looked as flat as those figures suggest.

“I didn’t start the way I wanted to,” he said. “I was very, very nervous. It’s normal for every player to get nervous. But I was very happy that after that innings I came back and contributed.” And how. He dismissed Bumrah to take his first Test wicket and end that innings, and claimed 4/55 in the second dig, a haul studded with the wickets of Mayank Agarwal, Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane.

India won by 113 runs, but South Africa levelled matters at the Wanderers with an exemplary display of fourth-innings batting under pressure. Besides rattling Bumrah, Jansen took 4/31 and 3/67. His figures at Newlands were 3/55 and 4/36. He was a consistent threat even to India’s finest batters: he dismissed Rahul three times and Agarwal, Cheteshwar Pujara and Rishabh Pant twice each.

But it’s his altercation with Bumrah that many will remember the longest, not least because they were in the Mumbai Indians’ squad last year. Bumrah played in both games that featured Jansen. “We are good friends but sometimes on the field things get heated,” Jansen said. “You’re playing for your country so you’re not going to back down for anyone. And he did the same. There’s no hard feelings, it was just in the heat of the moment, two players giving their all for the country.”

With him in India was Duan Jansen, his identical twin brother and also a tall, left-arm fast bowler. The only discernible difference between them is that Duane is four centimetres shorter. “We grew up together and we know everything about each other, and he is my best friend,” Marco Jansen said. “It’s weird in some way that we are basically the same player. Sharing the journey with him is something special. We love each other very much and we share everything with each other.

“He came along [to the IPL] as a net bowler. He practised with us. And he also learnt a few things. It was a great experience for him and for us to experience that together. It’s amazing. We never would have thought we would be sitting here, both of us, playing the sport we love.”

Marco Jansen’s next chance to pinch himself to make sure he isn’t dreaming could come as soon as Wednesday, when the three-match ODI series starts in Paarl. “That’s a call-up I did not expect. I just want to go there and try and learn as much as possible. If I get an opportunity, hopefully I grab it with both hands.”

As we’ve seen, God-fearing introvert or not, he isn’t shy to do exactly that.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

India’s tantrum gave South Africa the series

“For a time, they forgot about the game.” – Dean Elgar on India’s reaction to the decision that kept him at the crease.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

“LOVE it!” Dean Elgar’s knee-jerk reaction to the unravelling of India’s players in the mad moments after he reviewed what seemed to be an open-and-shut case for leg-before at Newlands on Thursday won’t make the visitors feel any better about the incident.

“It was a team under pressure and things weren’t going their way, which they are not used to,” Elgar told an online press conference on Friday. “It played nicely into our hands that, for a time, they forgot about the game and were channelling more of the emotional side of what Test cricket has to offer.”

The Hawk-Eye element of DRS determined that the ball would have bounced over the stumps, which surprised even Elgar — he was walking back to the dressing room by the time the decision was handed down. Marais Erasmus, who had given Elgar out, couldn’t believe it. “That is impossible,” Erasmus said, shaking his head.

The comment was picked up by the stump microphone, which also captured R Ashwin, the bowler who had been denied, saying: “You should find better ways to win, SuperSport.” Virat Kohli bent over the stumps and shouted: “Focus on your team as well when they are shining the ball and not just the opposition; trying to catch people all the time.” KL Rahul also had a go: “The whole country playing against 11 guys.”

This is the stuff of conspiracy theories. Broadcasters do not control umpiring technology, which is independently calibrated and provided — although, and wrongly, not by the ICC. SuperSport are South African broadcasters, but South Africa are not SuperSport’s team any more than India are Star Sports’ team. But a fraction of South Africans were interested in what was happening at Newlands, much less watching or “playing against” India.

Even so, the Indians’ displeasure was justified. How Hawk-Eye could determine that that delivery would miss the stumps beggared belief. When a batter who has been given out and the umpire who gave him out concur that he is indeed out, he is surely out. In legal terms, that’s tantamount to a judge accepting a confession as a plea of guilty. So why did Elgar review? For the same reason that the guilty appeal their verdicts: to stay out of trouble. And for the same reason that bowlers and fielders appeal when they know the batter is not out: because you never know what the umpires might say. Also, in this case, because Elgar was key to his team’s chances of winning.

Many Tests are remembered for what happens around a single delivery. But usually a batter, bowler or fielder earns that distinction. Rare is the match that sticks in the memory because of an umpire’s decision, rarer still when the instant involves an umpire who is not on the field, and rarest of all when it stars not a human but a box of electronics.

Happily for Kohli and his players, the ICC are not keen to punish them, although charges of bringing the game into disrepute would seem appropriate for many. Maybe it’s difficult for the ICC to come down on players when an ICC-appointed umpire agrees with those players, albeit more demurely. Maybe it’s tricky to go after players on a broadcaster’s behalf. Maybe the ICC could see that Elgar should have been given out.

Where India’s players let themselves down was in the brattish tantrum they threw in response. How is it going to help Kohli spark a surge to victory by screaming into a microphone, presumably for the edification of his compatriots watching on the other side of the globe? Instead of helping the visitors, the explosion changed the course of the match and thus the series, which was level at 1-1 going to Cape Town.

Elgar said the moment opened “a window to score more freely and chip away at the target”, and the facts back him. South Africa were 60/1 chasing 212 when the controversy erupted before the end of a hot, hard, intense, grinding day. Before that fateful over, Shardul Thakur had delivered a scoreless over to Keegan Petersen, whose single off Ashwin was the only run in the previous over. In the over before that, Elgar’s edge off Thakur fell just short of Cheteshwar Pujara at first slip. 

The over immediately after the dodgy DRS decision yielded 10 runs, with both batters hitting Thakur for fours. Ashwin bowled another scoreless six balls — but Elgar was able to leave three of them. Then Jasprit Bumrah went for eight in the first over of a new spell. In the nine overs before the close after Elgar should have been out, South Africa scored 41 runs. In the nine overs before, they had scored 19.

The Indians’ histrionics cost them their composure, the match and the series. South Africa’s seven-wicket win made them only the second team in cricket history to beat the world’s top-ranked side in a three-match series after going down in the first game. More painfully still, for Kohli and his men, the first side to have done that, against Australia in 2001, were India.

“After losing the first Test [at Centurion by 113 runs] we knew we were going to be up against it,” Elgar said. “We needed guys to stand up from a character point of view and make more of a conscious effort and be a lot more aware of the position they have within the side, purely to bring the best out of the player. Ultimately, that will influence the environment. I am thankful for the way the guys responded. This was a proper squad effort.”

That’s not to suggest Elgar is an angel, as evinced by his decision to review against the odds. But he is evolving: “My skin is pretty thick when it comes to on-field matters and matters that value the team in a big way. I’d like to think I am complimentary when it comes to dealing with every member in the squad, which is something I maybe lacked in my younger years. Now, maybe being more experienced, I’ve gained the kind of people skills that I lacked. I’d like to think it’s something I am still going to work on and grow as a human.

“You’ve got to have mutual respect with every player; it’s a two-way street. That enables you to have the conversations we’ve had in the last few weeks. The players need to take that on board. They need to understand that I am not there to manipulate them. I’m not there to try and do their career injustice because I need them to operate at a level that is respectable at this level of cricket. If you want to be the best, you need to operate at that level, like what we have done over the last few weeks. But you need to be consistent around that. 

“I’d like to think I’ve got a pretty good relationship with everyone, from the oldest player to the youngest. I’d like to think I connect with them in a pretty good way; a special way. The guys know Dean is doing this for the right reasons. It boils down to respect. 

“We all want to influence things in our ways, but the team’s way is the only way. It sounds a little bit harsh, but if you want to be the best you need to have that skill. I’d like to think I’m not offending anyone with the language I use. I am there to motivate and influence this group.

“The pressure situations are tough, especially when you don’t have bat in hand. You can’t control anything that’s happening out there. That’s something I manage pretty well. You don’t want to show your emotions on camera. It’s something I have learnt and I’ve had to learn it quite quickly. From a captaincy point of view, it’s helped me being calmer and not panicking too soon.”

Other captains, are you listening?

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.