By George, this Linde might have it

There’s a touch of a young Clint Eastwood to George Linde’s jib, and some of Kepler Wessels’ cussedness in his saunter.

TELFORD VICE | Paarl

This time last week George Linde was minding his own business in the bio-bubble, the odd man out in South Africa’s T20I squad. He had last played a match in the format almost a year previously, when he conceded 18 runs in the only over he bowled and was run out for two. Why did South Africa want him around considering they had Tabraiz Shamsi and Keshav Maharaj? Even Jon-Jon Smuts seemed ahead of him in the queue, albeit Smuts is more a batting than a bowling allrounder. 

Linde’s performance was far from the reason the Cape Town Blitz lost to the Nelson Mandela Bay Giants at Newlands on December 6 — his most recent T20 before the current series against England — but you wouldn’t have thought he was on course for a place in South Africa’s side.

He played six matches out of a possible 10 in last season’s Mzansi Super League, took five wickets, was 24th in terms of economy rate among bowlers who had sent down at least 10 overs — and 14 places off the bottom of that list — and couldn’t score more than 63 runs in six innings, two of them unfinished. If Linde had potential to play in the shortest format at the highest level, it wasn’t self-evident.

So expectations weren’t high when he was named in the XI for Friday’s first T20I at Newlands, and had dwindled further when he came to the crease with eight balls left in an innings that had shambled to 161/5. But there’s a touch of a young Clint Eastwood to Linde’s jib, and some of Kepler Wessels’ cussedness in his saunter, and he didn’t seem surprised when he lashed the third ball he faced through extra cover for four. The seventh, a full toss, disappeared over square leg for six. Maybe this “kid” — he turns 29 next Sunday — could play the game at this level after. But the proof would be in his strong suit.

Accordingly, expectations perked when he stood at the top of his run holding the new ball. And peaked when Jason Roy leapt at the second delivery like a man taking a spade to a snake. Quinton de Kock held the edge, and Linde had made his case. It needed the skill and quick thinking of Kagiso Rabada, diving low and forward at square leg, to claim a catch from Dawid Malan’s scything sweep. But catch it Rabada did, and there it was: after nine deliveries, Linde had figures of 2/2.

South Africa lost, convincingly, a match that clearly was their first in almost nine months. They batted too boldly, bowled too breezily, and made too many decisions better suited to beach cricket. But Linde’s performance was a reason for them to be if not cheerful then at least cheered that attitudes were in the right place. 

Would the second game of the series in Paarl on Sunday deliver more such evidence? Or was that too much to expect considering South Africa’s state of unreadiness, at least some of it due to lockdown regulations?

Certainly, unexpectedness was in the air in the hours before the match, what with a posse of riders from the Draconian Motorcycle Club — as their leather jackets proclaimed — forming part of the motorway traffic heading to Paarl on a hot, bright morning. The club’s Facebook page implores members to support efforts to raise awareness about what the racist right wing calls, falsely, an epidemic of farm murders in South Africa. All of 21,022 people were murdered in South Africa from April 2018 to March 2019. Only 57 of all the country’s murder victims in 2019 were farmers. The Draconians wore helmets, so it wasn’t possible to tell if some of their members were the white former players who have raised the same red herring in their criticism of cricketers espousing or supporting Black Lives Matter ideals.

About that, at Newlands two banners were affixed to the stands reading: “We stand in solidarity against racism and gender based violence. CSA stands for equality.” Neither of the banners made it to Paarl. Maybe there was too much motorcycle traffic on the motorway. 

This time Linde took guard in the 14th over with South Africa having crashed to 95/5. He turned the first ball he faced off his hip, easy as you like, for two. He survived an appeal for leg-before by Jofra Archer, coming round the wicket, hit his team’s first four in 10 overs when he slapped Tom Curran through cover, and launched Curran’s next ball over long-on for six. Then he sent Chris Jordan’s attempted yorker scurrying through third man for four. He was run out for a 20-ball 29 to end a stand of 44, the biggest of the innings, he shared with Rassie van der Dussen.

Soon there Linde was again, standing at the top of his run, new ball in hand. Roy made another mad lunge, this time at the first delivery of the innings, and damn near edged it again. But there were no more wickets for Linde. Not yet, anyway. Even so, 0/27 from four overs is more than decent against a bristling batting line-up on a flat if slow pitch.

South Africa lost again, though less convincingly, and with that went the series. It’s unfair on Quinton de Kock considering his inexperience as a captain, but the fact is he now owns the worst record of all 11 leaders the South Africans have had in this format: played 10, won three.

But Shamsi, whose spirited bowling that earned him a return of 3/19 was another spot of sunshine in the gloom, wasn’t looking too deeply into all that. “We haven’t played together for nine months,” he said after that match. “So it’s going to take us a little bit of time to gel again. There’s no need to panic.” 

Not to panic, but to be concerned going into the now irrelevant third match at Newlands on Tuesday. And, if that doesn’t go well enough, ahead of the three ODIs.

But while you have odd men out like Kepler Eastwood in the side, players who know how to get a job done even when belief in their ability to do so wavers, you have something. It’s called hope. You also have something else: a way to meet those pesky expectations.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Charity begins at home for SA batters

“That’s the nature of the beast.” – Faf du Plessis on Beuran Hendricks’ nightmare over that went for 28 runs and, along with too many limp dismissals, cost South Africa victory in the first T20I.

TELFORD VICE | Newlands

A framed black-and-white photograph hangs among eight others on a wall of the press’ temporary situation at Newlands. It is of Jacques Kallis on the hook. All that touches the ground, a good 15 centimetres behind the crease, is the toe-end of his right boot. His left leg is almost straight out in front of him, kicking the air can-can style, the toe-end of that boot at his eye level.

His head has swivelled to face backward square leg. His hands have whipped through the shot and are about to reach the equator drawn from the point of his left shoulder. The look in his eyes is of a gnarled boxer who has landed the left hook of his life. Mercifully, the ball has fled the scene.

Only then does it hit you: he’s in whites! Kallis has played this outrageous stroke, this thing of visceral, lasting power, this immaculate confection of ambition and impossibility … in a Test match!

Even in its static, two-dimensional form the photograph is a sight much richer and rewarding than what was going on out the window in lurid full colour. South Africa were playing their first match in 265 days at Newlands on Friday: a T20I against England, which will be followed by two more and then three ODIs.

The total in attendance, players, umpires, scorers and all, was 306. And six Egyptian geese, who made determined but foiled attempts to cross the pitch while South Africa were putting up 179/6, the fourth-highest first innings in the 20 T20Is played here and the home side’s second-biggest at this ground.

It was also 25 runs more than South Africa scored when they beat England in September 2007 — the only one of the three day/night T20Is played at this ground won by the side batting first.

But that was when T20 cricket was as new as Test cricket seems old now. So the target should have been significantly bigger. Of the South Africans dismissed, only format debutant George Linde, who was yorked with the last ball of the innings, wasn’t charitable with his wicket.

Worse, Quinton de Kock gave his away with a blip to cover to end a steady march to 30, Faf du Plessis looked like he had been batting for weeks — which he has — before holing out to square leg for 58, and Rassie van der Dussen had forged flintily to 37 when he slapped a full toss to deep backward square. South Africa’s batting reeked of the cricketing criminality of unfinished business.      

The geese stalked the outfield throughout England’s reply, seemingly unalarmed when Jason Roy left the field in a flurry of F-words after trying to sweep the second ball of the innings — bowled by Linde — and edging to De Kock, and didn’t flinch when Jos Buttler and Dawid Malan also got out inside the first six overs. Neither did Ben Stokes’ picking out Linde on the long-on fence in the 15th, after clipping 37 off 27, to end a stand of 85 with Jonny Bairstow, ruffle their feathers.

Maybe they knew Bairstow was up for the fight. His combative 86 not out, a performance worthy of a fiery, bearded redhead, kept England on top throughout an innings that wobbled this way and that. Bairstow faced 48 balls and hit 60 of his runs in fours and sixes. And he hit them properly, none more so than the one-handed drive he sent scurrying through the coves for four despite Beuran Hendricks’ low full toss swinging away late.

Perhaps the geese also knew that, with neither of allrounders Andile Phehlukwayo and Dwaine Pretorius in the XI, Heinrich Klaasen would be called on to bowl for the first time in his 12 T20Is, that he would bowl to Stokes and Bairstow, and that his single over would cost 14 runs.

And that Hendricks would lose the plot in a nightmarish 17th over that started with England needing 51. When it ended, they needed 23. Two singles, three fours and a six was bad enough, but what melted South Africa’s hopes was the eight wides — five of them off one delivery that hit the ground for the first time somewhere in the outfield on its way to the fine leg fence. The geese, along with every South Africa supporter, knew from the start it was a dumb idea to leave out Anrich Nortjé.  

If Hendricks needs a shoulder to cry on, he has Du Plessis’, who said: “In T20 cricket you’re guaranteed that someone is going to go on the night. As a leader, I wouldn’t look into it too much if one guy goes for runs. That’s the nature of the beast. Tomorrow he could bowl in the exact same areas and he gets a five-for. I wouldn’t judge him too harshly. Tonight wasn’t his night, and they played well against him.”

Bairstow clinched England’s five-wicket win with four balls to spare: a six arched towards the building site beyond long-on. It was a handsome stroke without being special, a way to get the job done rather than a blow that will be frozen in a frame to arrest all who see it. Kallis would approve, but not be impressed.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Cricket comes in from the cold

“We haven’t seen so many non-birds for months. Who let them in? They’re scaring the worms.” – one Egyptian goose to another at Newlands.

TELFORD VICE | Newlands

“EVACUATION procedure,” Newlands’ scoreboard glowered in giant yellow, white and blue electronic letters while South Africa and England warmed up on the outfield for the first T20I on Friday. “Make your way via the nearest emergency exit to behind the President’s Stand, the area between the nets and the B gate, or in Campground Road.”

On most days the relevant section of Campground Road is an ugliness of rattling, fuming traffic that hurtles unstoppably past the ground. On match days, when at least half the street is closed, public space is reclaimed for the public. And the sun seems to shine a little brighter. The trees look a touch greener. Humanity replaces the hurtling killing machines we euphemise as cars.

But not on this match day. Just as there was no need to close the road, so there was no need to inform the crowd of the evacuation procedure. Because there was no crowd. There were only players, coaches, team officials, match officials, ground and administration functionaries, television types, and the press. That may sound like a lot of people, but we added up to just 306. Among us were a handful of security guards in dayglo bibs, punctuating the emptiness in the stands. What was their brief? To stop the players from fleeing the scene? Even in a comparatively small ground — Newlands’ capacity is only 25,000 — the desolation was palpable.

More relevant signs were affixed to blocks of seats in stands at the northern and southern ends: “We stand in solidarity against racism and gender based violence. CSA stands for equality.” It’s not taking a knee — none were taken here on a day they were by New Zealand and West Indies at Eden Park, while Australia and India observed a barefoot circle at the SCG — but it’s on the same page. Sort of.

Soon Dave Macleod, the voice of cricket and a lot else that happens in stadiums in South Africa, was booming to no-one: “Welcome ladies and gentlemen!” Music echoed around the ground, including “Pretoria Girls”, a song by Desmond and the Tutus, a rock group from, yup, Pretoria. Here’s the chorus: “I love Pretoria girls, I love Pretoria girls, I love Pretoria girls, I love Pretoria girls …”

Close to toss time a half-dozen Egyptian geese waddled up the western side of the pitch table, more or less bisecting the gap between the squads as they were completing their preparations. One side-eyed another, and you wanted it to ask: “We haven’t seen so many non-birds for months. Who let them in? They’re scaring the worms.”

Just after the toss, all four South Africa and England flags around the ground sank to half-mast in observance of the five days of mourning the president, Cyril Ramaphosa, has decreed to commemorate victims of Covid-19 and gender-based violence.

The teams lined up for the anthems with the South Africans in earshot of the commentators broadcasting from a grass bank nearby. “There’s been a lot of talk about social justice this week,” JP Duminy began, and went on at length even as his former teammates stood stoic and silent and facing in the opposite direction. You could have cut the awkwardness with a twitching moustache as the players waited to be rescued by the dirge of “God Save the Queen”.

Almost too soon, Sam Curran stood at the top of his run at the Kelvin Grove End. At the Wynberg End, Temba Bavuma was coiled into a crouch, tapping his bat on the pitch like someone counting down to the launch of a rocket. It had been 265 days since South Africa were last on the field. The waiting was over.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

SA to show support for anti-racism

Some christians in South Africa’s squad have religious objections to kneeling, which no-one had at the 3TC game.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

IN a change of heart, South Africa will articulate their support for racial injustice at Friday’s first men’s T20I against England at Newlands after all, Cricbuzz has learnt from an impeccable source. The issue has raged since it was confirmed on Tuesday that the home side would not take a knee — the now familiar gesture offered in support of Black Lives Matter (BLM).

In a powerful statement on Thursday, the players explained their embrace of anti-racism and said they would work towards helping to create a better society in a country that still suffers from the devastation caused by more than 300 years of brutal racial oppression. But they did not give reasons for their decision not to take a knee. A CSA media manager barred questions on the subject during a press conference on Wednesday.

Cricbuzz understands some members of the squad who subscribe to christianity have said they have religious objections to doing so, as they believe they should kneel only in prayer. But that doesn’t square with the fact that all involved in the 3TC game at Centurion on July 18 — which featured 19 of the 24 players in the T20I squad — did take a knee. What form Friday’s gesture will take is still to be seen, but it is unlikely to require kneeling.

The attention on the issue has been heightened by the fact that South Africa have not played a match since the BLM movement gained prominence in the wake of George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police on May 25. Asked during an online press conference on July 6 whether South Africa’s players would have their own conversation on race issues, Lungi Ngidi said they would and offered to lead it. His comments sparked a backlash from white former players, which prompted black and brown former players to cite racial abuse they claimed they suffered during their careers.

Even as players in a range of sports and countries were taking a knee without objection — the practice continues before matches in the English Premier League — an increasingly heated race debate tore through South Africa: a country where race has been used to divide and conquer, and is central to the fact that it is the most unequal society on earth.

Friday’s action won’t change that, but it will help put the players on the right side of the fight to do so.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Cricket neither can nor should escape the real world

“The players were devastated on receiving the news that they had tested positive for Covid.” – Shuaib Manjra, CSA’s chief medical officer

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

WHAT would happen if more players tested positive for Covid-19 going into the first men’s T20 between South Africa and England at Newlands on Friday? “There probably won’t be a game,” Shuaib Manjra, CSA’s chief medical officer, told an online presser on Thursday.

It was a stark thing to say. But these are stark times. Both teams are staying at the same Cape Town hotel. None of the England players have contracted the disease while they have been in the country, but two South Africans — one before the squad went into their bubble and one afterwards — have been diagnosed. Two others who were in contact with one of the infected players have been isolated.

“If you’ve got lots of positives you’ve got a quarantine context,” Manjra said. “We cannot bring in a player from the outside without testing them at least twice before we bring them into this space. If a large group of people test positive we wouldn’t have adequate opportunity to bridge people into the bio-bubble. But we’ve got a squad of 24. Hopefully we can put a team together.” *

The South Africans’ fourth round of tests were conducted on Thursday morning. They hope to have the results by this evening. The hours will not pass quickly.

“We tested on Tuesday, and it was stressful,” Manjra said. “You can imagine what the consequences would have been should we have had a positive test. Thankfully all the results came back negative. But you can imagine the stress you go through waiting to find out. Yesterday and Tuesday players were asking every five minutes when their results were coming back.”

Those affected cannot be named, unless they do so themselves. But that seems unlikely, given how they had reacted to their fate.

“The players were devastated on receiving the news that they had tested positive for Covid,” Manjra said. “One player, who tested positive out of the bubble, had to be kept out. He’s taken quite a bit of strain in the sense that he’s been isolated in a hotel all alone and not participating in training. There’s going to be a lag period in him coming to the quad and getting back to fitness because of injury concerns. If you’ve been in a hotel room for 10 days we can’t simply throw you onto the park. We’ve got to give at least another seven days to return to match fitness in order to consider him for any of the games. It takes a mental toll on him and all the others.

“The dynamic is very different for the player who tested positive within the bubble. We could place the player in what we call a red zone, so there’s no contact. But because he was already part of the bubble there was some degree of limited contact with other players. That had an impact, because then we had to separate players into contacts and non-contacts, and the contacts into smaller groups. In the event that somebody tested positive we could isolate a small group of people rather than the entire contact or non-contact group. That had a role to play in the dynamic of the team in terms of training, dining and socialising.”

Friday’s match, should it happen, will be South Africa’s first since March. Five players in the squad were in action in the IPL and others have played for their domestic franchises. But care has been taken to get them to this point.

“We were concerned when we had a long lockdown,” Manjra said. “We had to have a six-week lag period for players to get back to fitness. In the English Premier League the injury rates went up by 200% post-Covid. That was a cause of concern for us. If you don’t pass your fitness test you’re not considered for selection, simple as that. We set rigid criteria, and all the players passed their fitness test.”

The South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA) has provided psychological support for the players, who also have access to help provided by CSA. 

“SACA realised the consequences of being in the bubble for a long time,” Manjra said. “The guys who’ve been at the IPL have been in a bubble for 11 weeks. Faf [du Plessis] went directly from the IPL to Pakistan, so he’s been in a bubble for 12 weeks. That takes a huge mental toll. ‘KG’ [Kagiso Rabada] has called it a luxury prison. It’s not a bad environment, but being locked down takes its toll on you.”

Taking the test itself was another matter: “Players don’t like it. We had a guy here doing the test on Monday and the players complained, so we had to try and get somebody else. Some of them are over enthusiastic, and not only get into your nose but into your sinuses and into your brain as well. It’s an uncomfortable test, but it’s very short.”

Covid-19 is among several significant factors the South Africans are juggling that might not seem connected to what they will try to do on the field. But how better to take the nation’s minds off the effects of the pandemic, if only for a while, than with a good performance? Why not use the platform to speak good against the evil of racism? And as long as the team is out there playing decent cricket, the failings of CSA’s suits won’t irk as much.

“Preparing without distractions is an ideal situation, but in the real world you always have distractions,” Manjra said. “Was our preparation ideal? There’s been a couple of hiccups. But one of the things that allowed our team to build resilience is the kind of work we’re doing in the background with the squad. Building resilience is not about removing distractions. It’s how you deal with those distractions, which will always be there.”

Welcome to the real world. Now, get on with it. 

* All players in both squads tested negative on Thursday.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

1st T20I preview: Focus on SA’s uncertainties

“The guys are ready to go and help change what’s been going on around cricket in South Africa.” – Quinton de Kock

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

THIRTY-SIX matches of men’s international cricket have been played since England and West Indies brought the game back from the worldwide Covid-19 lockdown in Southampton on July 8. None of those contests have featured South Africa.

That will change at Newlands on Friday, when Quinton de Kock’s team are set to take on England in the first of three T20Is, which are to be followed by three ODIs. If it seems as if everything else in the world has also changed since South Africa were last on the field in March, that’s because it has. From the pandemic to the race debate that exploded in the country as part of the global Black Lives Matter uprising to the heights the internecine strife at CSA has reached, nothing is as it was. About the only thing that hasn’t moved is that South Africa still haven’t appointed a Test captain to succeed Faf du Plessis, who stepped down in February

How will South Africa respond to all that uncertainty on the field on Friday? Having angered many by saying they will not take knee to show their opposition to racial injustice — but also released an impassioned statement pledging their commitment to anti-racism — the pressure to perform well will be significant. The prize is that nothing relegates the real world and issues above and beyond cricket to the sidelines as effectively as victory, the more thumping the better.       

But the South Africans will be up against it. De Kock, Faf du Plessis, Kagiso Rabada, Anrich Nortjé and Lungi Ngidi featured in the IPL, but David Miller is the only member of the rest of the squad who has played a T20 since February. Five last saw action in the format in December.

England, by contrast, have played 18 matches, six in each format, since helping to restart cricket in Southampton in July — when they did take a knee. They have won three of their five completed T20s, which includes a series success over Australia at home in September.

Jos Buttler, Dawid Malan and Jonny Bairstow were their major batters in that rubber, and Adil Rashid was their most successful bowler in terms of wickets and economy. That should change in South African conditions, where Jofra Archer and Mark Wood will be key threats.

It’s tempting to cast the series as a battle of the quicks, what with South Africa throwing Rabada and Nortjé into the fray. But T20 is a batter’s game, and the difference is far more likely to be made by big hitters like Buttler and Ben Stokes. In that department, South Africa will bank on De Kock and Janneman Malan. The more measured batting will come from Eoin Morgan and Du Plessis.

England must start as favourites. The South Africans will hope the energy they have conserved while being locked down all these months will boost their chances. But that’s not the way these things tend to pan out. Even so, right now just getting onto the field will feel like winning for the home side.

When: Friday November 27, 2020. 6pm Local Time  

Where: Newlands, Cape Town

What to expect: A desolate building site. Capetonians like to talk up their cricket ground as the game’s Nirvana. Not right now. With more cranes than spectators in the place — a major redevelopment has collided with Covid-19 regulations banning crowds — it looks more like a scene from a dystopian movie. But Table Mountain is still there, and the pitch is still the pitch: fair and balanced, with enough zip to keep the seamers interested and enough zap to allow batters to play freely.     

Team news

South Africa

Allrounder Dwaine Pretorius is out of both series with a hamstring injury he picked up in training. He will not be replaced in the squad.  

Possible XI: Quinton de Kock, Janneman Malan, Temba Bavuma, Faf du Plessis, Rassie van der Dussen, David Miller, Anrich Nortjé, Kagiso Rabada, Lutho Sipamla, Lungi Ngidi, Tabraiz Shamsi.

England

England will announce their team at the toss as they wait to see whether the groundsman takes more grass off the surface. The main decision is whether Sam Curran or Moeen Ali takes the number seven spot, with the former in better recent form but the latter providing England with a second spin option. While the identity of the top six is more or less settled, the order in which they will bat remains to be seen. The only certainty appears to be that Jos Buttler will open with Jason Roy. After that, it’s anyone’s guess.

Possible XI: Jos Buttler, Jason Roy, Dawid Malan, Jonny Bairstow, Ben Stokes, Eoin Morgan, Sam Curran, Chris Jordan, Jofra Archer, Mark Wood, Adil Rashid.

“The guys are ready to go and help change what’s been going on around cricket in South Africa. We’re the leaders, and we’re going to try and lead from the front.” — Quinton de Kock on the more important issues than cricket afoot in the game in South Africa. 

“There are very few times you play sport or contribute to things when people actually really need it. Given the circumstances, how bad they still are, particularly at home, it’s important for us to go out there and hopefully put on a bit of a show.” — Eoin Morgan gets it.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

All for Markram, none for De Bruyn

First win for the Lions, Cobras the only team without a win after three rounds.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

AIDEN Markram and Theunis de Bruyn had the most contrasting experiences possible for the Titans against the Warriors in franchise first-class matches this week.

Sisanda Magala claimed the only five-wicket haul of the round for the Lions, whose victory over the Knights was sealed by a record stand by Joshua Richards and Dominic Hendricks.

Khaya Zondo scored a century for the Dolphins in their draw against the Cobras, which is now the only winless team in the competition. 

Opener Markram scored 149 and 121 in Centurion, marking the first time in his first-class career of 69 matches that he has made centuries in both innings. He was the only Titans player to reach 50 in totals of 320 and 289. Teammate De Bruyn, who batted at Nos. 3 and 4, suffered his first pair in his 71st first-class game. Marco Jansen took match figures of 7/135 for the Warriors.  

Yaseen Vallie’s 80, Sinethemba Qeshile’s 97 and half-centuries by Matthew Breetzke and Lesiba Ngoepe earned the Warriors a first-innings lead of 72. It chased 218 to win, and got there with three wickets standing thanks to Vallie’s 55 and sturdy 30s by Rudi Second and Ngoepe.

At the Wanderers, Magala took 6/60 in the Knights’ first innings of 300, in which no other bowler claimed more than two wickets. The Lions crashed to 47/5 in reply and were dismissed 98 runs behind with Mbulelo Budaza, Migael Pretorius and Gerald Coetzee sharing eight wickets.

Wiaan Mulder and Delano Potgieter claimed seven wickets between them in the Knights’ second innings of 235. That set the Lions a sizeable target of 334, which Richards and Hendricks — who scored nought and six in the first innings — whittled down patiently in their opening partnership of 256. Richards’ 136 was his first franchise century, and the partnership is the biggest for the first wicket for the Lions. The previous record, 226 by Stephen Cook and Reeza Hendricks against the Cobras in 2017/18, was set in Potchefstroom, a featherbed compared to the Wanderers’ lively surface. The Lions lost 4/33 after the openers were dismissed, but won by four wickets. 

The Dolphins declared in both innings at Kingsmead, where Zondo made 105, Senuran Muthusamy 79 and Marques Ackerman 66 for the home side before the Cobras were dismissed 77 behind — Tony de Zorzi made 58 — with Muthusamy taking 4/58. Scores of 56 by each member of the Dolphins’ top order, Sarel Erwee, Muthusamy and Keegan Petersen, built the lead to 294 when the declaration came. The Cobras had slipped to 155/6 — key batter Zubayr Hamza fell first ball — when the draw was agreed. Muthusamy completed a solid allround performance by taking 4/56, giving him match figures of 8/114. 

The Titans and the Knights have now won two matches each, while the Lions celebrated success for the first time. The Warriors is the only side to have lost two games, and the Cobras the only team with two draws.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa players commit to ‘dismantling racism’

“Our team decision on not taking the knee does not indicate that we do not care about racism, racial equality, or justice. Now, more than ever, we are committed to this work.” – the Proteas

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

A day after CSA barred questions on South Africa’s men’s team’s response to a society wracked with division over racial injustice, the players have explained their stance.

Kagiso Rabada confirmed during an online press conference on Monday that “[coach] Mark [Boucher] has stated that the team will not be kneeling and that’s how it’s going to be”. On Tuesday, at another online presser, Rassie van der Dussen was prevented from elaborating on the reasons why.

The issue has boiled over on the cusp of South Africa’s first series since March: it will start series of six white-ball internationals against England at Newlands on Friday. And it will not take a knee or, as things stand, show the nation it represents any outward indication that it has taken note of the increasingly polarised debate over racial prejudice and abuse that has torn through cricket in South Africa in recent months. But it will wear black armbands in support of a national campaign against gender-based violence, an ongoing epidemic in the country that is aided and abetted, and often a result, of systemic racism.  

“As a team we have unanimously chosen not to take the knee at the upcoming matches but to continue to work together in our personal, team and public spaces to dismantle racism,” a statement from the players on Wednesday said. “This decision was taken by the team collectively, after deep dialogue and attentive consideration. This is not a decision compelled on us by either our management or our coaches. Let us be clear, our team decision on not taking the knee does not indicate that we do not care about racism, racial equality, or justice. Now, more than ever, we are committed to this work.”

South Africa was the last bastion of legislated white supremacy until 1994. The laws of the land have changed but not the reality of lived experience. Millions of black and brown South Africans still live stunted lives because of entrenched racism, while whites are still unfairly privileged. Doubtless the players are coming to terms with those truths.

“Over the last six months, the Proteas team has engaged with honesty, empathy and vulnerability in exploring together what anti-racism work looks like and why this work matters so profoundly in this cultural moment,” the statement said.

“Together we are exploring the making of race historically, the ways racialised identity was used to create hierarchies of privilege and discrimination in South Africa and the ongoing legacy of colonialism and apartheid. Together we are exploring the development of Black Lives Matter [BLM] in the sphere of sport, starting with the kneeling of American football quarterback Colin Kaepernick in the US. Together we are unpacking the historical and political context in which BLM grew in the US. Together we are exploring the significance of taking the knee and a raised fist in the air as symbols of protest, and how and why these have spread globally as well as their significance in the South African context.”

That sounds like progress. Already, the statement said, “The team firmly believes that a commitment to dismantling racism and the ongoing legacy of racialised inequality is a process, not an event”, and “that what is required is for us to commit to be anti-racist, not simply non-racist”, and “that this work starts with us individually and us as a team”, and “that our capacity to listen well to one another, to hear differing perspectives, and to express empathy and understanding matters greatly”, and “that we must use our platform to address injustice, to oppose racism and to champion racial justice”.

Some South Africans will not accept this. They’re the people who believe that sport and the real world belong on different planets. The statement sought to put that right: “Our first job is to play cricket for the country but we are also citizens of this country. The Proteas team is a community within the wider community of South Africa. The conversations that are happening in the country as a whole are conversations we must be engaging with as a team. The issues that are facing the country as a whole are issues that must matter to us as a team.

“Likewise, the actions and decisions we take as a team have impact on the country as a whole. We do not take this responsibility lightly. We ask in turn that our wider community honours the process we have engaged in over the last six months, the hours of rigorous conversation and dialogue we have had with one another, the many workshops we have participated in sharing our stories, our experiences and our opinions, and the ongoing commitments we have made to continue this journey.

“This work has been honest, vulnerable, and personal. We are building commitments to one another and demonstrating ways of engaging that we simply never have before as a team. We are building a team culture based on open and frank conversations, creating real and sustainable change, as well as embodying our team values of belonging, empathy and respect.”

Sadly and frustratingly there was nothing on why the players would not take a knee, or offer any other visible signal to illustrate their position. But seldom has any team said something so powerfully beautiful; so valuable to our common humanity. It’s up there with South Africa’s much-vaunted constitution as a reason to be proud of being part of this country.

And seldom has a chance to help put those fine words into action by employing the simplest of gestures been such an obvious next step.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Fundudzi report lays bare CSA’s dysfunction

Between them, Thabang Moroe and Naasei Appiah accounted for 83% of CSA’s spending on alcohol.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

CSA’s interim board earned its first major victory over the organisation’s culture of secrecy and control on Wednesday when all 457 pages of the Fundudzi forensic report were made public. The document was used to fire Thabang Moroe as chief executive, and could lead to disciplinary action being taken against others.

The members council, nominally CSA’s highest authority, had previously tightly restricted access to the report. It at first balked at allowing parliament to see it and demanded non-disclosure agreements from the few who did, citing fears of legal action.

“The board is alive to the fact that some individuals and organisations have concerns that they have been mentioned or implicated in the report, that some individuals have not being heard and that the report does not necessarily paint a full picture,” a release on Wednesday said. “The board has nevertheless concluded that it is overwhelmingly in the public interest and in the interest of CSA to release the report at this time.

“All stakeholders will be given a fair opportunity to convey their views. In addition, no action will be taken against any person implicated without a full investigation, fair procedures, and in particular everyone being given the opportunity to be heard.”

A 46-page summary of the report, prepared by CSA’s own lawyers, was released on October 5. It mentioned Moroe 71 times. The full version features him 681 times. In many of those instances, not in a good way.

The view of the process that led to his appointment on July 16, 2018 — after CSA had received applications from 35 candidates, of which it shortlisted eight and interviewed four — is withering: “When compared to other shortlisted candidates, Moroe lacked the minimum tertiary qualification. Moroe did not have a minimum of eight years executive management experience in business, cricket or commercial entity [as required for the position]. CSA’s board was aware or ought to have been aware that Moroe did not meet the minimum qualification for the position of CSA chief executive.”

Many calamities later, Moroe was suspended on December 6, 2019. “In his letter of suspension, CSA chairman and president of the members council, Chris Nenzani, indicated that the charges largely related to the revocation of media accreditation as well as lack of oversight and related matters,” the report says. That followed severe deterioration in CSA’s relationships with the players and the sponsors, and the projection that it could lose up to USD65.5-million by the end of the 2022 rights cycle. Five journalists who reported critically and consistently on cricket’s sorry state of affairs — including me, in the interests of full disclosure — had their accreditation revoked “on Moroe’s instruction” on November 25 last year. The resultant outcry from the public, sponsors and the South African National Editors’ Forum prompted Moroe’s suspension. He was fired on August 27 this year.

Welsh Gwaza, CSA’s company secretary and the most powerful person in cricket — perhaps excluding the interim board — features in the summary report a scant four times. He doesn’t get off that likely in the unabridged edition, which names him in 254 places. His fingerprints are all over CSA’s disastrous decision to put the Western Province Cricket Association under administration in February last year — which was overturned in court, with costs — and, according to the report, he spends a lot of time and effort thinking up ways to set lawyers on journalists. Oddly, then, he “does not recall a specific discussion around the revocation of media accreditation”.

There’s more, so much more. Including that “CSA has been issuing credit cards to staff for years without there being a policy that provides guidance on the use of the credit card”. CSA cards were used to “pay for alcohol during business functions” in 27 transactions from August 19, 2016 to August 24, 2019. The equivalent of USD20,856 was spent, USD6,081 of it by Moroe on six different occasions. But the champion booze buyer was Naasei Appiah, who was fired as chief operating officer on August 16. He signed 13 times for a total of USD11,226, including the biggest single amount: USD3,080 at a champagne bar in Cape Town on November 26, 2018. Between them, Moroe and Appiah accounted for 83% of CSA’s alcohol expenditure during the four years under review.

We will have to stop there, not least to give the report the attention it deserves. But the lid is off, the lights are finally on, the toothpaste is out of the tube. Watch this space.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

CSA heat race debate with clumsy attempt to cool it

If Covid-19 and gender-based violence are appropriate causes to highlight, why not centuries of ongoing racial injustice?

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

CSA has shut down discussion during press conferences on the increasingly fraught subject of South Africa’s men’s team’s response to the concerns over racial injustice that have swept the country in recent months. That could inflame tensions in a game where many feel unfairly denied even as others believe the all-white 1970 “national” team, a product of apartheid and its systems that won all four Tests it played against Australia, represents the pinnacle of South Africa’s cricket history.

Rassie van der Dussen became, on social media on July 16, the first white current South Africa player to support for Black Lives Matter and “equal opportunities for all”. Generations of his black and brown compatriots suffered for centuries under minority white rule. They still do, albeit that South Africa has embarked on the road towards democracy.

The relevance of the issue is heightened by the fact that South Africa will be on the field for the first time since March when they begin a six-match white-ball series against England at Newlands on November 27. So it was clear the topic would be raised when Van der Dussen was billed to appear at an online press conference on Tuesday.

Eight minutes of questions and answers on other subjects passed before he was asked to explain the team’s decision, suggested by coach Mark Boucher on Thursday and confirmed by Kagiso Rabada on Monday, to not take a knee during the England rubbers.

Before Van der Dussen could answer, the media manager stepped in to say the matter had been discussed in two previous press conferences and that “I would like us to draw a line under it”. She invited the reporter to ask for an “off-line engagement”, and said questions in the conference should pertain to the England series. But Van der Dussen wasn’t stopped from saying how Covid-19 regulations were affecting him and the rest of the squad, which was also dealt with in Boucher’s and Rabada’s pressers, and the uncertainties created by CSA’s ongoing administration drama, which Boucher explored. It seems the fight against racism was the only important issue that was off the table on Tuesday. 

Perhaps that happened because South Africa have talked themselves into a corner about the appropriate reaction to the wave of hurt and anger that engulfed cricket in the wake of Lungi Ngidi expressing, on July 6, his hope that the team would discuss racial injustice and what to do about it. White former players bridled at that, sparking outrage from former black and brown players. Allegations mounted of past racial abuse in the game. All involved in the 3TC game at Centurion on July 18 took a knee, Ngidi’s wish came true at CSA’s culture camp in Skukuza in August, and it seemed cricket had made a commitment to understanding its realities better.

On Thursday, Boucher said the team was considering wearing black armbands to recognise the impact of the coronavirus and gender-based violence (GBV) on wider society. Why not put racial injustice on the list — either by taking a knee or adding it the causes denoted by the black armbands? How can South Africans trust that the players are sincere in their views on the pandemic and GBV if they fail to acknowledge another of the country’s elephants in the room?   

Because of CSA’s intervention on Tuesday, those questions seem set to remain unanswered. And so the issue becomes even thornier, and the focus stays off cricket itself.

On life in the bio-bubble, Van der Dussen said: “It hasn’t been too bad. I’m a guy who’s quite happy with my own conversation; my own time. It’s no struggle for me to be alone. I read a lot and I tend to think a lot about things. So to sit for an hour and seemingly do nothing is not a problem for me. I don’t necessarily need to have something or someone to keep me busy. It’s more of an adjustment than a challenge.

“To sit in a five-star hotel room is an absolutely minute price to pay for the honour of playing for your country against England, one of the best teams in the world. Some of the other guys have brought a lot of stuff — Playstations and things to keep them busy. For me, it’s been quite good.”

Here he is on the boardroom situation, where an interim board has replaced elected officials but only after CSA tried hard to stop that happening at the risk of state control and suspension by the ICC: “It’s not ideal. Over the course of the winter, because there wasn’t much else happening, it was brought to the forefront in terms of the players’ perspective.

“But we’re quite realistic in the sense that we know we can’t do much about it. We are employed to play cricket, and that’s what we’ve been doing and that’s what we’ll continue to do. SACA [the South African Cricketers’ Association] talks on behalf of all the players, but we’re here to play cricket, to perform, to win games for our country. And, by way of doing that, putting a positive message out there to the cricket-loving public. Leave those things to the side, leave it to the suits to sort out.”

What is Van Der Dussen reading? “‘Utopia for Realists’,” he said, and paused. “I forget who wrote it … Let me get it.” He disappeared from view for a moment, then returned holding the book to the camera.

“Utopia for Realists” is by Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian, and was first published in 2014. It is subtitled thus: “The Case for a Universal Basic Income, Open Borders, and a 15-hour Workweek”, and “How We Can Build the Ideal World”. The book’s Wikipedia page says it “offers a critical proposal that it claims is a practical approach to reconstructing modern society to promote a more productive an equitable life”.

Van der Dussen is an intelligent, thinking, curious, engaged person trying to live a conscious life. Why won’t CSA allow him to give what would be a considered and valuable view on one of the most important issues of all to more than one reporter at a time? We’re not sure we can ask that question.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.