De Kock shock hits SA cricket for six

“In life, you can buy almost everything except for time, and right now, it’s time to do right by the people that mean the most to me.” – Quinton de Kock 

Telford Vice | Johannesburg

THE way Quinton de Kock batted in the first Test against India at Centurion told all who saw him that something was wrong. Twice he chopped on, first to Shardul Thakur, then to Mohammed Siraj. He has been bowled off the edge before in his 91 innings, but only once by a seamer and never twice in the same match.

Although De Kock batted grittily for 100 minutes for his 34 in the first innings at Centurion, and clipped 21 off 28 in the second dig, he had the look of a man whose mind was elsewhere. It seems it was. A South Africa team statement released hours after the home side lost by 113 runs said De Kock had retired from Test cricket.

In 54 matches, he scored 3,300 runs at 38.82 with six centuries. Among South Africa’s current players, only Dean Elgar has more runs — 1,125 more. But Elgar has also had 31 more innings. The same goes for De Kock’s average: 38.82 versus Elgar’s 39.50. Aged 29, what might have been one of the game’s great careers is over. Or at least confined to white-ball matches — for now.

Those searching for reasons behind the news and who are reluctant to believe prepared statements will not be short of grist for their mills over the move De Kock has made. But it would be unfair not to allow him to make his case, even if it is presented on a CSA letterhead.

“This is not a decision that I have come to very easily,” the release quoted De Kock as saying. “I have taken a lot of time to think about what my future looks like and what needs to take priority in my life now that Sasha and I are about to welcome our first child into this world and look to grow our family beyond that. My family is everything to me and I want to have the time and space to be able to be with them during this new and exciting chapter of our lives.

“I love Test cricket and I love representing my country and all that it comes with. I’ve enjoyed the ups and the downs, the celebrations and even the disappointments, but now I’ve found something that I love even more. 

“In life, you can buy almost everything except for time, and right now, it’s time to do right by the people that mean the most to me. 

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has been a part of my Test cricket journey from the very beginning. To my coaches, teammates, the various management teams and my family and friends – I couldn’t have shown up as I did without your support. 

“This is not the end of my career as a Protea, I’m fully committed to white-ball cricket and representing my country to the best of my ability for the foreseeable future.”

That De Kock and his partner are about to become parents for the first time is among the best reasons there could be for his decision: he is entitled to want to be there for his child and their mother.

Then there’s his expressly stated abhorrence of the bubble life cricketers have been plunged into, and which led to him being put on a mental health break in February after the tour to Pakistan. Who could blame him for that. Remember, too, that he began 2021 as a captain and was .

With De Kock, it might be something as simple and understandable as wanting to spend more time fishing. As he could no doubt sustain his lifestyle on his IPL earnings alone, that becomes a no-brainer if you see things from his perspective.

Maybe what De Kock is trying to say is that cricketers have lives, too. And that he wants some of his back. Or that what was once a game he loved to play has become an overbearing chore in the most demanding and draining of formats.

De Kock was to have taken his leave of the Test team for the rest of the series against India in any event, but his decision will shock cricketminded South Africans. Too often in recent years they have had to endure their best and the brightest walking away in some sense or another.

Now De Kock has joined them in the wake of a worrying performance by his former team at a ground where they used to be formidable. This wasn’t going to be a happy new year in the first place. Now it is even more unhappy.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Welcome to South Africa’s new normal

“You need runs to be able to compete. We didn’t get that in our first innings.” – Dean Elgar

Telford Vice | Centurion

FEW people are imbued with as much inner light as Shaun Pollock, and he duly outshone the sun itself at Centurion on Wednesday. As the golden orb descended in the red and orange sky to the west after the fourth day’s play in the first Test, he sat in the front row of the pressbox to hand down a few minutes of enlightenment to a media outlet in India. He wrapped up with a genial, “OK, we’ll talk tomorrow after South Africa win. Good luck!”

Ten minutes after lunch on Thursday, with the sun still high in the sky, the jolly folly of Pollock’s giddy goodbye was confirmed. South Africa, lumped with a target of 305 and reduced to 94/4 going into the last day, had been dismissed for 191.

Near the end of Dean Elgar’s online press conference in the aftermath of all that, the connection between the dressing room and the pressbox began to frazzle. A reporter was asked to repeat his question. Then asked to repeat it again. Elgar’s end of the piece of electronic string seemed especially broken. “Pfrrr,” he said through pursed lips in frustration. “This is the new normal, everyone.”

South Africans will hope he was referring to the challenges of communication during the pandemic, and not to the way his team will henceforth play cricket. In this match, they did so poorly with bat and ball. India took advantage to score 272/3 on the first day on their way to a total of 327. They dismissed South Africa for 197 and 191 — their lowest totals at a ground where they had won 21 of their previous 26 Tests and lost only two. Another display like this at the Wanderers, where the second Test starts on Monday, and India will have their first series win in this country.

Did batting or bowling cost South Africa more dearly at Centurion? “You need runs to be able to compete,” Elgar said. “It’s safe to say we didn’t get that in our first innings, which should have been relatively doable for us. They bowled well with the new ball, and the nature of Test cricket is that you’ve got to compete against the new ball. We know what it’s like scoring 250-plus runs here. They scored over 300, which was always going to be a massive plus, batting first.”

What to do? With a must-not-lose game looming in three days, time to dissect what went wrong, nevermind find solutions, is a luxury the South Africans do not have. One idea might be to swap No. 3 Keegan Petersen and No. 4 Rassie van der Dussen in the batting order. Petersen — who faced 58 balls for his scores of 15 and 12 — has looked in better form than Van der Dussen, who made three and 11 off 99 deliveries.

“‘KP’ has come in and played in three Tests [scoring 79 runs in five innings], and the batting conditions he has experienced have been relatively tough,” Elgar said. “Maybe it’s not a bad thing to have those conversations and to give him a better opportunity with the older ball.” Petersen has scored 79 runs in five innings, but Elgar said he was better than that: “He’s had a bit of a rough start and it doesn’t reflect on him as a player. The stats don’t reflect his ability. I feel for him. I know he wants to make a play and is maybe a little bit anxious. We need to give him a better opportunity to try and contribute.”

That problem is related to another. Petersen has yet to come the crease on the back of a decent opening stand. The highest so far is the four runs Elgar and Aiden Markram shared in the second innings of the second Test in St Lucia in June. He has had to take guard in the first over of an innings three times, and twice after nine balls.

Elgar and Markram have opened the batting 49 times since September 2017, when they shared 196 against Bangladesh in Potchefstroom. Two innings later, against the same opponents in Bloemfontein, they put on 243. They also posted 141 against Sri Lanka at Centurion in December 2020, and have have put up 50 or more seven times. But they have not done so in their last nine partnerships.

Again, what to do? “We know what it’s about,” Elgar said. “In Test cricket, facing the new ball and opening is not easy. You get a good ball and you go and sit and watch the rest of the game. That’s the nature of the beast sometimes. I got a good ball in the first innings [when he was caught behind off Jasprit Bumrah]. Aiden’s dismissal in the second innings [when an indecisive Markram played on to Mohammed Shami] was also a rough one.”

On the brighter side, debutant left-arm fast bowler Marco Jansen took 1/69 and 4/55, and proved himself a dab hand with the bat, facing a total of 56 balls for his returns of 19 and 13. In particular, his cover drive is above the station of a lower order batter. Might he be elevated in the order, perhaps at the expense of Wiaan Mulder — who scored 12 and one and took no wickets?

“Those resources are at our disposal,” Elgar said. “We are going to definitely look into that. It ties up with a lot of things we are going to chat about. Wiaan had a pretty good game with the ball. He is not living up to his standards with the bat which is something we will chat to him about. Marco had a brilliant debut. He was our player of the game. He didn’t shy away from his responsibilities.”

Neither did Pollock, and he turned out just fine. In the old normal, that is.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Diamonds on the soles of Bumrah’s shoes

Time was when South Africans would will away approaching thunderstorms, not wish that they would break over their heads immediately.

Telford Vice | Centurion

AT a minute to 10 o’clock on a crystalline Highveld morning, all that moved on Centurion’s perfectly green outfield was Jasprit Bumrah. He shuttled this way and that both sides of his mark as he waited restlessly, arms whirling low and loose with eager energy. Presently, Adrian Holdstock lowered his left arm, and Bumrah set off from the West Lane End on that now famous hold the egg carefully, mind the speedbump, homage to the Statue of Liberty, herky-jerky run …

Only to be halted a few steps in by Temba Bavuma’s not quite readiness at the Hennops River End. Bumrah glanced behind him to see if there was a sightscreen issue. Satisfied there wasn’t, he held an upturned hand towards the batter and jutted his chin at him. As if to say, “Dude!”

Bavuma dug in once more. Back foot. Bat upturned against his aft clavicle, like an unadorned flagpole leaning on a fence. Front foot. The gentlest of kisses from bat to pitch. A respectful address of the front shoulder towards the onrushing bowler. A pointy backlift. A barely perceptible bounce of the knees. A coiled presence. And … defended. Bat met the first ball of the day as surely as the sun had dazzled the horizon hours earlier. Bumrah’s irresistible flurry was met by Bavuma’s immovable calm, and the defused delivery trickled harmlessly to earth.

Twice more in his first spell Bumrah was interrupted after he had leaned into his lurch toward the wicket. The first time it was movement near the sightscreen in an ostensibly empty ground that disturbed Dean Elgar. Bumrah acquiesced. The second time it wasn’t clear why Elgar had pulled away. Whatever the reason, it wasn’t good enough for Bumrah, who reacted by underarming the ball along the ground and up the pitch. Officially, he was asking for it to be shined. Unofficially, he was spitting mad. There was no mistaking neither the anger with which he slung the ball in the direction of the cordon nor the fact that he had aimed it at Elgar.

When Bumrah came round the wicket to trap Elgar in front, a shriek escaped his violently shuddering body as he catapulted forward; every muscle torqued to surely a dangerous degree. The slow motion replay revealed a white butterfly floating, zen-like and out of focus, high above the scene.  

Doubtless by then Bumrah had been forgiven his petulance. His strike meant India were locked and loaded for victory, and even those who have diamonds on the soles of their shoes break a lace now and then. The soles of Bumrah’s shoes should be insured for vast amounts. To watch him bowl, and not bowl, is to see the human spirit distilled into tangible form. It is a rare privilege.

Less so seeing South Africa shamble to another defeat, their third in the six Tests they played this year. And their fifth consecutively to India, a barren run that started at the Wanderers in January 2018 — when Virat Kohli’s team overcame close to impossible odds to launch their rise to the top of the world.

There is no shame in losing to cricket’s finest team, but playing below your own standards is another matter. South Africa did that on the first day, when the three wickets they took came at the outrageous cost of 272 runs. Their bowling was listless and directionless, and the extent of the damage caused was apparent when they took 7/55 once play resumed on Wednesday after the washed out second day. India’s last 17 wickets fell for 43 fewer runs than South Africa squandered in claiming the first three. Then they shambled to a reply of 197 — the only time they had been dismissed for fewer than 200 at this ground, until Thursday’s effort of 191 — with the first wicket tumbling to the fifth ball of the innings and the last five going down for 64.

By then, the Indians knew they could switch to cruise control. So there shouldn’t be any heart taken from the fact that South Africa bowled them out for 174 in the second innings.

That left Elgar’s team a target 56 runs bigger than any yet reeled in at Centurion. About that: this was only South Africa’s third loss at a ground where they have won 21 of their other 26 Tests. There was, then, something shocking about the keen interest from onlookers in the build-up of cumulonimbus clouds in the distance. Time was when South Africans would will away approaching thunderstorms, not wish that they would break over their heads immediately. 

Elgar was out 46 minutes into the day’s play for 77 and Bavuma spent 133 minutes defying and delaying the inevitable and leaving unbeaten with 35 hard-fought runs. In the 84 minutes of play that started when Elgar got out and ended when Ravichandran Ashwin snaffled Kagiso Rabada and Lungi Ngidi with consecutive deliveries to seal India’s win by 113 runs, South Africa lost 6/61.

Among those unfortunates was Quinton de Kock, who played his second poor stroke of the match and edged Mohammed Siraj onto his stumps. In the first innings, he did the same facing Shardul Thakur. Few South Africans would admit it, but it’s another indication of how much things have changed that there is unspoken relief that De Kock, their only world class batter, will take no further part in the series because the birth of his and his partner’s first child is imminent.* Rather let Kyle Verreynne have a go. He, at least, is not in a funk. At least, as far as we know.

South Africa’s New Year will not be happy. They have just three days to figure out how to stop India from winning at the Wanderers — where Kohli birthed his dynasty almost four years ago, where he will go to try to lead an India team to a series victory in South Africa for the first time, and where no India side have yet lost.

And where Bumrah, the bejewelled bowler, will again wait restlessly, arms whirling low and loose with eager energy.

* De Kock announced his retirement from Test cricket after the match.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Elgar, Bavuma key to South Africa’s fate

“Every sportsman has to believe that they can win from any position. You need that belief.” – Kagiso Rabada

Telford Vice | Centurion

AS the end of lunch loomed on Wednesday, contentment itself came lolloping down the 42 stairs that separate the dressing room from the boundary. The journey is long enough to gauge the mood of the traveller taking it, and short enough to keep that image sharp in the mind of the observer. 

In this case, an apparently loosely connected ensemble of rawboned shoulders, sharp elbows, springy knees and elastic ankles descended with bouncy, rhythmic athleticism and, once at ground level, skipped away towards the dugout. Rumpled onto the head of all that was a neon orange substitute’s bib, conjuring a punk take on Godric Gryffindor’s sorting hat.

Despite or perhaps because of his status in the first Test, Sarel Erwee didn’t seem to have a care in the world. Why would he? None of the fallout that will hit South Africa when India beat them on Thursday, weather and miracle permitting, is coming his way. Neither is he likely to be expected to fix things in the second Test at the Wanderers, which starts on Monday: as shoddy as the home side’s batting has been, it’s difficult to see how Erwee — a late-blooming top order player who scored two half-centuries in five innings in the recent A series in Bloemfontein — will muscle his way into the XI. So, no flies on him. 

The closest Erwee came to the 33-degree heat of the spotlight on Wednesday was when he was called on, briefly, to field in the deep while Lungi Ngidi was off the park. That handful of lost overs might have taken Ngidi closer to a 10-wicket triumph in the only competitive game he has played since July, and his only first-class match since June. Ngidi’s match haul of 8/102 asked questions of those who argue that the way to get the best out of bowlers is to make them bowl. It’s rare that any quick is niggle-free, which is even more true in Ngidi’s case. But he is happily healthy, and he showed what he could do given adequate rest and recovery.

When debutant Marco Jansen shattered Mohammed Siraj’s stumps to end the innings and finish with 4/55 — his reward for a second-innings performance significantly better than the first — a bail landed near Ngidi at fine leg. All in one fluid motion as he loped towards the dressing room, he collected it and tossed it, underarm, towards the middle with delicious nonchalance. Poetry isn’t made of words only. The rest of the South Africans hung back to allow Ngidi, Jansen and Kagiso Rabada, who took 3/72 and 4/42, to bound up the stairs first, and applauded them as they went.

Asked about Jansen’s showing during an online press conference, Rabada said, “He’s a phenomenal talent, as everyone has now seen. He’s an awkward customer to face — he’s tall and he’s got some pace, and he can swing the ball. In the second innings he justified his selection, and why the selectors and the captain and all of us have faith in him. He’s answered the question.” 

But pretty pictures about South Africa’s bowling are diversions from what matters. It’s the batting, stupid. South Africa are chasing 305 to win. They were 94/4 at stumps. No team have scored more than 249 to win at this ground, and that was in the tainted Leather Jacket Test “won” by England in January 2000. In uncontrived contests at Centurion, 226 is the magic number.

South Africa haven’t made that many to win anywhere since November 2011, when they scored 236/2 against Australia at Newlands. They have also won 11 times batting last since then when the target has been smaller. But, during the same period, they have been bowled out for fewer than 226 in the fourth innings 11 times. They haven’t saved a match with the bat since July 2014, when they stood firm at 159/8 having been set 369 to win at SSC in Colombo.

A South African last scored a Test century 39 completed individual innings ago, when Quinton de Kock made an unbeaten 141 in St Lucia in June. Since then, there have been only five efforts of more than 50. Pertinently, the fifth belongs to Dean Elgar, whose 52 not out on Wednesday was minute more than three hours and 122 balls of vintage cussedness from a player who thrives in adversity.

When he removed his helmet as he sauntered off, strain and disappointment was etched on his face for all to see — Keshav Maharaj had been undone by the mother and father of all yorkers from Bumrah with what became the last delivery of the day. But there was also relief that he had made it to stumps, and that he would be joined by Temba Bavuma first thing on the last day.

How many of the remaining 211 runs they will score together is less important than how many balls they will negotiate. And if and when a 60% chance of thundershowers on Thursday materialises. Currently, the forecast says it could start raining an hour into the day’s play and continue until the scheduled close.

Given the bristling bowling we’ve seen from India in this match, even an hour will be a long time for the South Africans. Rabada knew that well enough: “They’ve got pace and they’ve got skill. They’re showing why they’re a good attack.”

But he also knew — or said he knew — a South Africa victory was not out of the equation: “We’re just going to have to show belief. We’ll strategise overnight and work out how we want to approach this. But we have to believe. Every sportsman has to believe that they can win from any position. You need that belief.”

Elgar is the embodiment of exactly that, a talisman for his team and a reason for them to keep fighting. “Dean has done this a countless amount of times; where he shows fight and toughness. He showed that today. He’ll feel like his job’s not over. We know his job’s not over. He’s out there doing his best for his team, his country and himself. That’s standard Dean.” 

South Africa’s captain sets high standards. He will have to push them higher still to get his side through Thursday’s challenge. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Long walk back to fortress Centurion

“The intensity that we brought out there with the ball today, that’s what we’re going to require.”

Telford Vice | Centurion

“WHERE are the bodies?” The question from a passerby put a wan smile on the face of the figure sat on a chair in a corridor at Centurion. At least, you had to believe it did. Because you couldn’t see their face nor much else of them. If they weren’t smiling, maybe they had heard that one too many times already.

They, and their colleague across the way, were clad head to toe in white PPE; complete with hoods and gloves and single vivid blue stripes running for and aft, top to bottom, and side to side on their costumes. All that was visible, through a clear plastic visor, was their face. The bit of their face that was not covered by a mask, that is. They have been part of the extraordinary retinue of this series since the bubble was established.

It was not a scene you would expect to encounter at a cricket ground. But these are unprecedented times. And so the gallows humour was not misplaced. We’ve all seen people in this now grim get-up, mostly on a screen while they tend to the victims of the wretched virus in far corners of the world.

Mercifully, in Centurion they are there for no more morbid purpose than to serve as couriers between the real world and the sanitised cloister meant to keep the players and officials out of harm’s way. On Tuesday, for instance, one of the ghostly crew was called upon to replenish the coffee beans in India’s dressing room. That meant entering the “Red Zone”, as it calls itself on signs attached to the skeletal barricades marking its boundaries. 

That’s not the only indication that Centurion has changed. On the grass banks that surround two-thirds of the ground are ranged a dozen dapper moulded plastic figures; identical in form, different in colouring, and taller even than Marco Jansen. They step forward smartly with their left foot, leaning into their stride. Their left hand has hold of the brim of a top hat, their right grasps a walking stick angled sharply to the rear. Their coat tails flap behind them in the breeze like a fishtail. They are part of a brand activation that whisky drinkers will not need any more clues to identify. Another joke: you can advertise alcohol at the ground but, in terms of the Covid-19 regulations, you can’t buy a drink there. Not that there are any spectators in the stands to buy a beer or anything else, and no vendors to buy from.

But a handful of souls have gathered in a few of the private suits, which are allowed to open. The throatiest among them spent much of Tuesday morning welcoming Lungi Ngidi back to the fine leg boundary in appreciation of another wicket. He took 3/26 in the seven overs he bowled unchanged from the West Lane End to finish the innings with 6/71. From the Hennops River End, Kagiso Rabada bowled the other six overs needed to dismiss India for 327, taking 3/21 in his spell and 3/72 in the innings. Both put in the kind of relentless, bristling, uncompromising shifts that are the hallmark of South African fast bowling. And which were largely missing from the attack’s performance on Sunday, Ngidi excepted. On Tuesday, Ngidi and Rabada combined to take, for 55 runs in 15.3 overs, all seven of the wickets that were still standing after Monday’s play was lost to rain.

South Africans looking for signs, after an unconvincing first day on which India reached 272/3, that their team hadn’t lost their moorings would have been reassured. Like Donald and De Villiers, Pollock and Ntini, and Steyn and Philander before them, Rabada and Ngidi had the knowledge, the gumption and the heart to pull things back.

Then again, this is Centurion, where South Africa have won 21 of their 26 Tests and lost only two — one of them a contrived England win in January 2000, when a pile of cash and a leather jacket bought Hansie Cronjé’s agreement to try to manufacture a result after more than three of the first four days had been lost to rain.

There are no ramparts or draw bridges in these parts, although moats appear spontaneously when thunderstorms lash the dessicated earth, and in the right light the concrete can look medievally foreboding. But Centurion is no less a fortress for the lack of those details. Dominate South Africa here? Only one team have done that, and they had a fire-breathing dragon called Mitchell Johnson, who took 7/68 and 5/59 to bowl Australia to victory by 281 runs in February 2014. Good luck India …

“Keep walking … keep walking … keep walking …” Hooked on that lyric, the whisky sponsor’s jingle rang out every time a new batter strode to the crease. But it would have been as appropriate to play it for each departing batter. The closest we came to that was when the incoming Quinton de Kock crossed the boundary a few metres before the freshly dismissed Rassie van der Dussen had completed the journey in reverse. So “Keep walking … keep walking … keep walking …” made a premature, but apt, appearance. 

Only while Temba Bavuma and De Kock stood firm for 134 balls in their stand of 72 did the South Africans look like preserving the game as a contest. Bavuma’s 52, his 16th half-century and the product of patience and 161 minutes and 103 balls, was his umpteenth fighting innings; a thing of defiance. But there wasn’t enough where that sturdy effort came from, and South Africa were dismissed for 197 — the first time they have been bowled out for fewer than 200 at Centurion.

On a pitch that started spongey and has hardened into a surface that offers everyone something — and that bequeathed 18 wickets for 268 runs on Tuesday — India’s bowlers were superb. None more so than Mohammed Shami, whose mastery of line, length and seam movement made him as close to unplayable as any bowler should be allowed to venture. In five overs after lunch, four of them scoreless, he took 2/9. He was as good as that and his eventual reward of 5/44 makes him sound.

The first blow was struck by Jasprit Bumrah, who had Dean Elgar taken behind with a delivery that was easily good enough also to trap South Africa’s captain in front or bowl him. India were so comprehensively on top that they hardly missed Bumrah, who left the field in the 11th over after turning an ankle in his follow through. He didn’t bowl again until the 61st. The rest of the attack took 6/162 while he was indisposed.

One of the more stauncher members of the lower half of the order was debutant Jansen, who made a nuggety 19 and shared 37 with Rabada — the second-biggest stand of the innings. Jansen, who had an indifferent first day, when he went wicketless in 17 overs that cost 61 runs. But he had Bumrah caught at third slip to end India’s first innings, and was on a hattrick when Mayank Agarwal feathered his first delivery of the second dig to De Kock.

“He did have a bit of a tough start to his international career,” Bavuma said. “He confessed that the emotion and nerves got the better of him. Today, as we saw with his batting, he was a lot more assured and the confidence we know he has shone through.” That’s the kind of character South Africa will need as they search out the remaining nine wickets without allowing India to build their lead, currently 146, out of sight. 

“What’s happened has happened,” Bavuma said. “The intensity that we brought out there with the ball today, that’s what we’re going to require.” Not only to stave off defeat in this match but to rebuild the currently crumbling Fortress Centurion. To do that they will have to head in the right direction and keep walking … keep walking … keep walking …

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Olivier’s omission explained

“He was pap.” – a source on Duanne Olivier’s condition before the Centurion Test.

Telford Vice | Centurion

THE mystery of Duanne Olivier’s controversial absence from the first Test between South Africa and India in Centurion has been explained, albeit belatedly. Olivier was left out despite being the highest wicket-taker in the provincial domestic competition, and even after Anrich Nortjé was ruled out of the series with a hip injury. Was Olivier punished for going Kolpak?

But CSA said on Monday Olivier had recently recovered from Covid-19. It is understood he should be fit for the second Test at the Wanderers, which starts on January 3. On Sunday, selection convenor Victor Mpitsang was asked by reporters from several publications why Olivier was not picked. To one, he offered nothing more than season’s greetings. To others, he did not reply.

Cricbuzz has learnt that Olivier tested negative for the virus before the squad went into camp on Saturday. Even so, his bowling was not up to his usual standards during preparations for the first Test — “he was pap [flat]”, in one source’s estimation — and he was told his return to Test cricket would be put on hold. By all accounts, Olivier was relieved to be given time to get back to his best. He is also dealing with minor problems with his left side and hamstring.

Despite his first-class success, Olivier’s selection in the squad raised eyebrows. In February 2019, after he had taken 48 wickets in his first 10 Tests, he rejected the promise of a two-year CSA contract to sign a three-year Kolpak deal with Yorkshire. While he was there, he was asked whether he was interested in qualifying to play for England. He said he was; a reasonable response considering he thought he had ended his international career.

The Kolpak era was over on December 31, and several of the affected South Africans have thus been rendered eligible for international selection. One of them, Wayne Parnell, broke the ice when he played in an ODI against the Netherlands in Centurion on November 26. But the prospect of Olivier’s comeback has not been universally welcomed — his loyalty is being questioned in myopic quarters.

On Monday, the reporters who had asked Mpitsang why Olivier wasn’t playing were given a statement by the South Africa team manager’s and told to attribute it to the selection convenor. “Duanne Olivier is healthy and well, but did return a positive Covid-19 test result a number of weeks ago, which forced him to quarantine and took time away from his training ahead of the current Test series against India,” the statement read. “This did take place while he was away with the intention to spend time with his family and his work loads were not where the selection panel would have wanted them to be by the time he entered the team bubble ahead of the first Test match. He picked up a hamstring niggle during the two-day, inter-squad match at the start of the camp and the selectors did not want to risk him unnecessarily when there are two more Test matches to think about.”

So, instead of Olivier being named to play his 11th Test in Centurion on Sunday, Marco Jansen made his debut. “Statistically, Marco Jansen was the standout performer with the ball against India A in their recent tour to South Africa and the selectors backed him to take on the senior India team and do well,” the statement read.

Jansen took six wickets at 31.83 in the three four-day games the countries’ A teams played in Bloemfontein in November and December. But Glenton Stuurman — who is also in the Test squad — took seven at 27.14 while Lutho Sipamla, a puzzling omission from the Test squad, claimed nine at 33.11. So how Jansen was the “standout performer” in “statistical” terms in the A series is difficult to fathom. But Cricbuzz has learnt that feedback from the two selectors who were in Bloem to watch those games, Mpitsang among them, was that the 21-year-old, 2.06-metre tall left-armer was the most impressively threatening of the home side’s fast bowlers.

Hence Jansen deserved his chance, and though his return of 0/61 from the 17 overs he bowled on Sunday are not the figures that a young man in a hurry would want from his first day at the highest level, he showed glimpses of the quality that has earned him 62 wickets at 22.88 in 18 first-class matches. Had Quinton de Kock held the chance gleaned from Mayank Agarwal, Jansen’s day might have panned out differently.

“Every player who has been selected for this Proteas team is believed and backed to be capable of representing the national team and give a performance of the highest level,” the statement read. “The absence of one player does not take away from the quality that another brings to the set up.”

Understood. But if the questions had been answered when they were asked, a controversy could not only have been avoided but would also not have grown into a conspiracy theory.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

How Tutu made Jansen a Test player

“It’s a really sad day for South Africa.” – Lungi Ngidi

Telford Vice | Centurion

THEY were born almost 69 years apart, but both in Klerksdorp. One died on Sunday, hailed worldwide as the hero he was for his courage in the face of evil. The other became, in Centurion on the same day, the first person born this century to play Test cricket for South Africa. Desmond Tutu was 80 days into his 91st year. Marco Jansen was 21 years and 239 days old.

Without the indisputable greatness of Tutu, Jansen would never have marvelled at the pristine perfection of his deeply green, unbaggy South Africa cap, the magic of the new white shirts that had the Protea badge on the front and his name in capitals across the back, and the ridiculousness of being picked ahead of Duanne Olivier. 

Not quite. Jansen wouldn’t have known those joys without Tutu, Albert Luthuli, Lillian Ngoyi, Robert Sobukwe, Miriam Makeba, Steve Biko, Joe Slovo, Oliver Tambo, Ahmed Kathrada, Ruth First, Nelson Mandela and all the other luminaries in the pantheon who fought so long and so hard and sacrificed so much to free all South Africans from bondage mental and physical. Their triumph allowed the world to accept the country into civilisation, and thus back into the realm of international sport from which it had been jettisoned when even enslavers and colonisers could no longer look the other way. Tutu, a force of love, light and life, did more than most to drag South Africa out of darkness and thrust it, imperfect and blinking, onto a path towards democracy.

For a long time, Klerksdorp, since the 1830s a Dutch settler stronghold, then a farming hub, then a gold rush mecca, then an Anglo-Boer War battlefield and concentration camp — racially segregated, of course — and now a dry, dusty sprawl of heavy-set stone buildings brooding in wide streets and stewing in its history, would not have wanted to claim Tutu as its own. He was black, he was Anglican, and he refused to be subservient to the whiteness that was the law of the land. In places like Klerksdorp and far beyond, those were three ominous strikes. It needed remarkable fortitude over decades to keep fouling off the regime’s ever more unfair pitches, until the homerun of something like freedom was finally hammered over apartheid’s wall. 

So the black armbands hastily added to the South Africans’ sleeves when news of Tutu’s death broke shortly before the start of play were especially appropriate. Without Tutu and those like him, there would have been no armbands because there would have been no sleeves to attach them to — because international cricket would not have involved South Africa.

Jansen, who was born in May 2000, or more than six years after the shining day that heralded his country’s first legitimate elections, would have learnt about all that at school. But he would be forgiven for not thinking about any such thing from the instant he discovered that he would play. Not Olivier, who has taken 28 wickets — more than anyone else — at 11.10 in four provincial first-class matches this season? Or Sisanda Magala, who has 15 at 14.33 from two games? Or Glenton Stuurman and his 11 at 18.00 in two matches? Why wasn’t Lutho Sipamla and his 12 at 13.58 in two matches in the squad? Jansen’s numbers — 10 wickets at 12.30 in two games — put him in that ballpark. But if Olivier wasn’t going to play how did we get to Jansen? Cricbuzz asked CSA’s selection convenor, Victor Mpitsang, for the thinking behind Olivier’s omission. He saw the text message but did not reply.

So it fell to Lungi Ngidi to try and explain Jansen being preferred to Olivier: “I wouldn’t know. Everyone’s been preparing well. It was probably a senior [player] call or a management call, because everyone was looking good. We didn’t even know who was going to play. Even myself, having not played in a while, I didn’t know if I was going to get the nod. But, like Dean [Elgar] always says, we pick the best team that we think is going to give us the result. Marco got his debut and I’m very happy for him.”

It seemed Jansen was questioning his presence himself when he loped in to deliver his first effort, a dying swan of a full toss outside off stump that Mayank Agarwal easily put away through point for four. By then not only had Kagiso Rabada and Ngidi sent down four flaccid overs, but South Africa had blown a review: Rabada had brushed KL Rahul’s upper arm, not his bat or gloves. So Jansen wasn’t helped by running into a scene bereft of the requisite tension.

Two dots followed his first ball. Then came an overpitched delivery that Agarwal on-drove silkily for four. And then an offering that veered legside, which was dismissed through midwicket for another boundary. One over, a dozen runs: welcome to the top, Mr Jansen.

Only four runs came off his next three overs, partly because he didn’t venture close to the stumps or bat often enough to be hit. Then he did — too full and too straight, presenting too good an opportunity for Agarwal not to claim another four down the ground. Jansen’s next delivery was sprayed short and wide, and dismissed to the cover point fence.

Why was he playing again? An answer of sorts came immediately: Agarwal’s shoulders spun open to a ball that left him, and the resultant edge flew just above head height towards Quinton de Kock, who dived and dropped a chance he would have expected to hold. More evidence of Jansen’s quality came with consecutive deliveries in his next over, when he induced an edge from Rahul that didn’t carry and beat him outside off.

After lunch, Jansen began his second spell as he had his first — with a gimme that Agarwal muscled through extra cover for four. But, with the first delivery of the fourth over of that spell, Rahul lost his head and nearly his wicket to a rib-tickler that he sent spiralling over the cordon.

There are, thus, reasons for Jansen to look back with a measure of satisfaction on his first day as a Test player. But also reasons for him to know he could have done significantly better. Too often he followed a poor ball with another or, worse, allowed the pressure he had built to escape by sending down something that had no place at this level. 

At 21 years and 239 days old, Jansen can afford such learning experiences. He should take inspiration from Sipamla, who had a similarly underwhelming debut day exactly a year ago on the same ground against Sri Lanka. Having struggled through 14 lacklustre overs in which he took 1/68, a revitalised Sipamla claimed 3/8 in two overs the next day and finished the match with six wickets. 

Jansen could also follow the example of Rabada and Ngidi, who redeemed themselves through discipline and consistency, and by showing patience while the sun hardened a surface whose early dampness slowed the ball without offering the expected reward of seam movement. Swing was there little.

Ngidi ended only the second century opening stand scored by any of South Africa’s opponents at this ground — and just the fifth of 50 or more — by trapping Agarwal in front for 60 midway through the second session with a ball that looked to be sailing high and wide. On referral, and after a lengthy delay, Hawk-Eye said otherwise. 

“I thought it was a good shout,” Ngidi told on online press conference. “If anything, I thought it was going to be umpire’s call. But when Marais [Erasmus] kept his finger down, then it became a gamble. I thought it had kept low compared to the bounce that I was getting. Trying to convince the team was another situation. But I think ‘Quinnie’ was in [Elgar’s] ear, and he said at worst it would be umpire’s call. When it started taking so long [to reach a decision] everyone started doubting themselves and saying we might have lost a review.” 

With his next delivery, Ngidi had Cheteshwar Pujara caught at short leg by a tumbling Keegan Petersen. An hour after tea, Ngidi drew Virat Kohli into a ragged stroke wide outside off that became a catch at first slip.

Ngidi had last played any cricket in a T20 World Cup warm-up match on October 20, and his most recent first-class outing was the second Test in St Lucia in June. Before Sunday, he had bowled 553 balls in first-class cricket in 2021. Olivier had bowled 1,700 deliveries, Jansen 1,053, and Rabada 990. Perhaps Ngidi’s success on Sunday could be ascribed to freshness.

But it would have needed more than one bowler in decent form to stop India from reaching 272/3 at stumps. Rahul will continue on Monday, hoping to turn his undefeated 122 into something monumental.

If the South Africans need a diversion before play resumes, they might wonder whether Jansen is their tallest ever player. At 2.06 metres, he has 10 centimetres on Morné Morkel, no less. More morbidly, the home side could ponder why an India tour seems to coincide with a significant death. In December 2013, Mandela died on the same day as an ODI between South Africa and India at the Wanderers. In January 2018, the Wanderers Test started the day after the demise of jazz great Hugh Masekela.

And now Tutu. Klerksdorp, like the rest of the country and much of the world, is in mourning. “It’s a really sad day for South Africa,” Ngidi said. Should Jansen amount to a fraction of his fellow Klerksdorper as a human being, nevermind a mere cricketer, he will have done great things.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Lights, camera, action await Elgar and Kohli

“They are ranked No. 1 in the world. But the mere fact that we’re playing in our backyard gives us the upper hand going into the series.” – Dean Elgar

Telford Vice | Johannesburg

RARELY can a Test series have been gifted such cinematic premise. Two captains, one looking to make his mark in his first home series in charge! The other stung by the removal of part of his leadership! Both proud, passionate, powerful men! The home team battling challenges on and off the field! The visitors determined to defend their deserved record as the game’s finest! At a ground where they have never won! A set built for drama, complete with thunder and lightning from above as well as below! Cue the opening sequence, and enough with the exclamation marks already.

Dean Elgar is a year older than Virat Kohli and seven years behind him as an appointed Test captain. Elgar has been at the wheel for four Tests already, the first two as a stand-in. Now the buck stops with him. Kohli’s legion of supporters will want him to show the suits just how wrong they were to relieve him of the ODI skippership.

Elgar made a pair on debut, against Australia at the WACA in November 2012. In his first match as captain, also against Australia but in Adelaide in December 2014, Kohli scored 115 and 141. India lost that match but Kohli won the more important victory of establishing himself as his team’s undisputed boss. Elgar wouldn’t mind some of that charm rubbing off on him, although he probably also wouldn’t mind another pair if it came in the cause of winning. 

Kohli himself could do with a touch of his historical form. He has gone 23 innings without a century. Although he has passed 50 five times during that time, he has also suffered four ducks — not insignificant when we consider that, in his other 141 innings, he has been dismissed without scoring only 10 times. Elgar has been his team’s leading runscorer in a year in which they have beaten a weak Sri Lanka and a mediocre West Indies, but lost against a decent Pakistan outfit. 

Elgar and Kohli are combative characters who want things done their way, and they don’t mind being unpopular if that’s what it takes to make that happen. Both seem to regard cricket as a struggle, often waged at an intensely personal level, for something close to morality. In a world where too many who entertain us with bat and ball do so without showing a discernible smidgen of human spark, they crackle with the stuff. For that, we should be genuinely grateful. They cross lines. They divide opinion. They fall victim to daft views and stick with them. So what? They get a lot more right than wrong. And, importantly, they are never boring.

The nuts and bolts of the series are both tight and loose. Elgar has confirmed that Quinton de Kock will be part of the series only for the first match, whereafter he will disappear into the world of partner support, nappy changing and sleeplessness that come with the territory of first-time parenthood. With that South Africa will lose their only world class batter, something they can ill afford considering two of their likely top six — Keegan Petersen and Rassie van der Dussen — have yet to score a century at this level. Indeed, Elgar and De Kock account for 19 of the 25 hundreds that top six have among them. For reasons of team balance, India may have to do without Shreyas Iyer, who revealed his class by making 105 and 65 on debut against New Zealand, the world champions, lest we forget, in Kanpur last month.

All of which is subplot to the battle between Elgar and Kohli as leaders of their teams, and another that engages them against shadowy off-screen forces, real or imagined. Elgar has voiced loud support for Mark Boucher, who has been implicated in the systemic racism that exists undeniably in South African cricket. Boucher has apologised, but remains a divisive figure. Kohli, not long ago all but immortal, has been brought down a peg or two by his demotion as ODI captain. 

Given the weather forecast for Centurion, where the series starts on Sunday, the lights will likely be required. The cameras are ready. All that’s needed now is action. Or, can we say, one more time with feeling: “Action!”

When: Sunday, 10:00 Local Time

Where: Centurion

What to expect: A stern test of batting ability on the first two days, a feast of runs on the third, and creeping inconsistency in bounce on the last two. Also, an outrageously fast outfield. Much of which could be rendered irrelevant by a prediction for rain on Sunday and, particularly, on Monday. 

Team news:

South Africa: With Anrich Nortjé out injured, Duanne Olivier’s return to Test cricket is all but assured. As experience and accomplishment is in short supply in the batting ranks, Dean Elgar will have to carry more than his fair share of the burden in his first Test as captain on home soil. 

Possible XI: Dean Elgar (capt), Aiden Markram, Keegan Petersen, Rassie van der Dussen, Temba Bavuma, Quinton de Kock, Wiaan Mulder, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Duanne Olivier, Lungi Ngidi.     

India: Ravindra Jadeja’s injury-enforced absence has cast India onto the horns of a dilemma. Do they try and stick with the five-bowler template that has served them well, or hope and trust that four bowlers can get the job done in what should be helpful conditions? Of course, five bowlers will mean room for only five frontline batters, and that on a challenging surface. 

Possible XI: KL Rahul, Mayank Agarwal, Cheteshwar Pujara, Virat Kohli (capt), Ajinkya Rahane, Rishabh Pant, R Ashwin, Shardul Thakur, Mohammed Shami, Jasprit Bumrah, Ishant Sharma.

What they said:

“They are ranked No. 1 in the world. You can’t not give them the credit for what they have done over the last while. So I’m not going to sit here and say they are not the best side in the world, because there’s a ranking system for a reason. But the mere fact that we’re playing in our backyard gives us the upper hand going into the series.” — Dean Elgar treads carefully between confidence and respect.

“The pitches can be challenging because of the tennis-ball bounce. In Australia the pitches are fast and bouncy, but here it can be spongy in the first couple of days. Then it starts to quicken up. When I played [in South Africa] last time, the wicket was a bit difficult and you had to understand and adjust according to that. That becomes a challenge for both batters and bowlers.” — KL Rahul shares some inside information from the outsider’s perspective.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Shattering Kolpak’s glass ceiling

“I’m going to ask if I can get a new one … if I play.” – Duanne Oliver needs a Test cap.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

IN case of emergency, break glass. So best Duanne Olivier keeps a hammer handy. The crisis is set to arrive on Sunday, when he is likely to be named in South Africa’s XI for the first Test against India in Centurion. 

That would be good news for a team denied their ace, Anrich Nortjé, by a hip injury. As well as for Dean Elgar, who will take charge of a home rubber for the first time. And for the cricketminded South Africans who are not indulging in petty politics by obsessing over Olivier’s former Kolpak status. But for Olivier himself selection would present a problem.

His one and only Test cap — which he was given when he made his debut against Sri Lanka at the Wanderers in January 2017 — should have been in the luggage he packed to join the squad on Saturday. Instead it’s behind glass in a frame.

And why not. When Olivier’s three-year deal with Yorkshire was announced in February 2019, after he had taken 48 wickets at 19.25 in 10 Tests, he would have had good reason to think he had no further use for his cap. That he had it framed is the best answer to the social media miseries whining that he did not cherish playing for the national team. Clearly, he did — enough to proudly display his prize on a wall.

Almost three years on, during which the Kolpak era has ended and Olivier has returned to the fold, his carefully curated pride could put him in a predicament. Part of the lore of Test cricket is that players are presented with one one cap, which is why those who have long careers end up wearing ragged relics. Caps are not meant to last a hundred or more matches, as all could see from the dilapidated specimen that Steve Waugh sported long before he played the last of his 168 Tests.   

What to do? Olivier wouldn’t be allowed to leave the bubble, do the needful, clean up the mess, and return in time for Sunday’s start. Maybe someone in his household could do the smashing and grabbing for him and deliver the goods? There has to be a simpler, better, faster solution …

“I’m going to ask if I can get a new one,” he said in media material released by CSA on Friday. Traditionalists, of which cricket is cursed with far too many, would balk at that. Who did the man think he was demanding a new cap?! Not for the first time, the joke would be on them.

The one player, one cap philosophy isn’t at all venerable. It started as recently as the 1990s, when it was promoted by Mark Taylor to forge unity. Waugh succeeded Taylor as Australia’s captain, and took the notion to new heights. Or depths, depending on your sartorial sensibilities.        

The truth is players used to be suppled with a new cap for every series. For all their mythologising about the Baggy Green, Australians haven’t always treated it like a holy artefact. Bill Ponsford would paint his garden fence in a Test cap, all the better to keep his hair clean. For the same reason, Bill Lawry, cricket’s most famous pigeon fancier, wore it when he cleaned his birds’ enclosures. Theoretically, Ian Chappell should have 19 Baggy Greens. That’s how many Test series he played in. In fact, he has none: he didn’t keep a single one.

You would go a long way to find people more proud to have played for Australia than Ponsford, Lawry and Chappell. But they weren’t hung up on the actual cap. Perhaps they should have been — in January last year Shane Warne’s was auctioned for AUD1,007,500, which was paid to bushfire emergency services in recognition of the sterling service they rendered during the “Black Summer” of 2019/20.

South African cricket has a tendency to copy what happens in Australia, so the one and only cap concept has taken hold here, too. But there have been exceptions. Quinton de Kock has had his replaced after losing the original. And if you’ve noticed Elgar looking sharper in recent series, this could be why. His old cap was more like Waugh’s than anything anyone could wear without having to resort to industrial strength shampoo afterwards. So he was given a new one.

To his line above about his cap conundrum, Olivier added, “ … If I’m playing.” Of course, if he isn’t picked he has no need for new headgear. But even the traditionalists would concede that is about as likely as Warne turning down an opportunity to bowl to Daryll Cullinan.

Olivier has been the class act in South Africa’s first-class competition this season, taking 28 wickets at 11.10 in four matches for the Lions. Regardless of Nortjé’s fitness, there should never have been a debate about him playing. What some have called a controversy was entirely manufactured, as poorly as it was transparently so. He is eligible and he is performing. What else matters? Those smallminded South Africans who have a problem with Olivier’s presence because of their wrongheaded thoughts on patriotism need to get over themselves.

“I’m very happy to be back in the squad and, yes, I know people will have mixed feelings about it,” Olivier said.” But, at the end of the day, it’s okay. You handle that and you deal with those pressures or the criticism that comes with that. But you know, when I came back, I felt very welcome with everyone.”

That didn’t mean he expected to pick up where he left off: “I’m a nervous person when it comes to playing, and if it’s my first over I’m very nervous. Maybe it might be similar to a debut because I haven’t played [for South Africa] for three years. It will be interesting to see what the nerves will be like. But I’m sure, if I am selected to play, my nerves will be shot through the roof.”

Elgar spoke on Monday about the growth he had seen in Olivier’s game since he went to England. Previously, he had been a galumphing thumper of a fast bowler who relied mainly on pace and the pitch. It seems the rigours and requirements of county cricket have added arrows to his quiver. 

“I feel like I am a different player,” Olivier said. “Firstly, I’m more mature. From a cricketing point of view, I genuinely believe I’m different. The UK has helped me a lot; just perfecting that fuller length that every bowler wants to bowl. For me, it was quite difficult because it can come across floaty and I wasn’t that consistent. I’m still working on it: I’m not going to get it right every time.

“People thought I only bowl short, and fair enough: I did. But now I feel like I have a different element to my game. It might not work every time but I believe in my process, I believe in my strengths, and I believe that’s the best way I can help the team.” 

India come to South Africa as the top-ranked Test side. They are led by Virat Kohli, who has accomplished almost everything there is to accomplish in the game. Except win a Test series in South Africa, which the Indians never have. South Africa go into the rubber under a range of extraneous pressures, not least those fuelled by a public divided over Mark Boucher’s suitability for his role as head coach. Boucher, who has only a level two coaching certificate, has been attacked since his appointment in December 2019. The noise reached a crescendo in July when Paul Adams said Boucher had been among the players who had described him as “brown shit” in a dressing room song. Boucher’s apology has been drowned out and dismissed by anger.

“There will be a lot of pressure but if we can, as a team, stick to our plans and not get drawn in by outside news or whatever emotionally, we will be in a good position,” Olivier said. “You’re playing against world-class players, but at the same time it’s an exciting challenge. I would need to bowl to Kohli. It will be tough but it’s exciting. You’re bowling to probably the top four batters in the world. It’s like making a statement to them: we are here to compete, we are not just going to roll over.”

“It’s not about focusing on everything happening outside. It’s about focusing on ourselves as a team and investing in our environment and the way we are going to go about things. That is very important because when things are tough, you are going to have to rely on your teammates. When you are up against a wall, that’s when you are going to need everyone together. And we are. The beauty of this bubble thing is that you get to spend time with people. It’s good. You adapt.”

And you break glass if you must. Or have a word with the team manager.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

A smile to delight and disgust

“Maybe we have to say we back our coaches and management and we need to give them a lot of love.” – Dean Elgar

Telford Vice | Cape Town

WHEN Dean Elgar smiles, pay careful attention. It’s not that South Africa’s Test captain doesn’t crack a grin as often as anyone else. He does, maybe more than most. But what makes his face light up sets him apart from those made of different, perhaps less sturdy stuff.

Mention tough times and see him beam. This comes with the territory. Opening batters accept as part of the job challenges that are beyond the abilities of those who will come to the crease after them. Some know this from the start of their careers. Others learn the lesson soon enough, or they don’t last. Elgar has lasted with the best of them.

He had 21 first-class innings before he opened the batting, for the Eagles against the Titans in Bloemfontein in February 2007 — and promptly scored 225. He made a pair on Test debut, at the WACA in November 2012, when he batted at No. 6. But two innings later he banked the first of his 13 centuries, an unbeaten 103 against New Zealand at St George’s Park in January 2013, batting at No. 7. Six innings after that he opened for the first time at that level. He has done so in 94 of his 120 Test innings, and exclusively since July 2014. Mixed and matched between the numbers is the character of a throwback to the days when cricketers didn’t care who they offended, as long as they put their team first.      

So questions about South Africa’s problems on and off the field had Elgar smiling wide at an online press conference on Tuesday. The latest calamity was the withdrawal on Tuesday of Anrich Nortjé, South Africa’s most successful bowler in the format this year with 25 wickets at 20.76 in five matches, from the imminent series against India because of a hip injury.

That ends the debate about the inclusion in the squad of Duanne Olivier, who said in answer to a reporter’s question after he signed a Kolpak contract with Yorkshire in February 2019 that he would want to play for England. The end of the Kolpak era on December 31 last year brought Olivier back into contention for South Africa, where he has been the stand-out bowler in the first-class competition this season with 28 wickets at 11.10 in four matches for the Lions. Thus Olivier, who took 48 wickets at 19.25 in 10 Tests before his defection, thoroughly deserves a recall. But South Africans who confuse sport with patriotism have been angered by his selection.

Elgar is not among them: “I’m excited to have him back, knowing what he can do on the field. There’s no bad feelings about what’s happened in the past. I want to win cricket matches and series for South Africa, and I’m sure I’ve got 100% backing in our changeroom when it comes to that.

“He adds a different intensity and energy. You can see he’s a different cricketer to what he was the first time he played for us, which is awesome. He played a lot of cricket in the UK, so he’s bringing a lot of knowledge and experience to the changeroom. That’s something we need at the moment. He’s a matchwinner. If he can win cricket matches for us I’m all for having him back.”

The Nortjé setback came on the back of a blue Monday of news. First CSA said they would investigate Graeme Smith and Mark Boucher, the director of cricket and the men’s national team coach, in the new year in the wake of the Social Justice and Nation-Building (SJN) project making adverse “tentative findings” about them regarding allegations of racist conduct. That was followed by the scrapping of the third edition of the Mzansi Super League, which was to have been played in February, for financial and Covid reasons. Then CSA announced that the stands would be empty during India’s tour of three Tests and as many ODIs, also over pandemic fears.  

As an international of more than nine years’ standing and a first-class player for more than three years before that, strife and bungling in South African cricket is nothing new to Elgar. Even so, the governance and financial depths the game has crashed to in the past four years have been remarkable even by CSA’s lowly standards.  

“We’ve been through such crappy times that we’ve actually formulated such a good bond within our group,” Elgar said. “If we were in the first month of all these bad scenarios, then maybe we could use that as an excuse. But we’ve been there, and we’ve formulated something that works for us. We’re extremely strong. Our culture’s been tested and pushed to levels I didn’t think it would have been pushed to in my short term as captain [since March]. I think we’ve come out on top of it. It’s about the learning process behind it. We must always be mindful that even if things are bad off the field we can’t use that as a cop-out. We’re a professional team and professional players, and we want to strive to go up the rankings. We focus on cricket and hopefully cricket will look after us.”

But it seems the testimony implicating figures like Smith and Boucher at the SJN, the negative reaction that followed, and the project’s report — which is vague and clumsily compiled and being challenged by lawyers, hence CSA’s probe — had indeed permeated the dressing room walls. Certainly, Elgar’s contempt for the suits was plain. As was his dissatisfaction with what he saw as their lack of support.

“We’ve had so many different administrators that we don’t even know who’s there now,” he said. “We haven’t had a lot of stability from an administrative point of view. Hopefully sooner than later there’s a lot more stability within CSA.

“Backing has been tough, especially with regards to our coaches and our team management. I don’t think we’ve received a lot of good stuff around that. From the players’ point of view, maybe we have to say we back our coaches and management and we need to give them a lot of love.

“It’s not nice to see our coaches get lambasted for things. I know the work they’re putting in behind the scenes, which no-one else sees. Only us as a players’ group notice that, and we’re extremely grateful. That’s one of the biggest downsides of what’s been happening the last while.”

As much as opinions like that, and the way they are expressed, will delight some South Africans, they will disgust others — particularly many of Elgar’s black and brown compatriots, who see the SJN as a rare opportunity for truth and reflection in the ongoing conversation about race in South African cricket, which remains skewed towards white interests in many senses — from the number of white players in the national teams to the location of the grounds where those sides appear.

So Elgar will doubtless be criticised for his comments. The only way that blow can be blunted will be for him to perform and for his team to win. He sounded up for the task: “It doesn’t matter which teammates I’ve had in the past, I’ve always wanted to be someone who leads from the front with the bat. Scoring runs is massive for me, let alone being the captain and making decisions. I’m never going to run away from that responsibility.”

India’s supporters, too, won’t take kindly to Elgar saying: “We know it’s going to be tough. It’s also going to be tough for the Indian batters to face our bowlers. I’d rather be sitting here knowing that than sitting in the Indian dressing room knowing that they have to face our bowlers.”

Similarly, asked about Ravichandran Ashwin’s record against South Africa — the off-spinner has taken 53 wickets at 19.75 against them — Elgar lurched onto the front foot: “He hasn’t had a lot of success in South Africa. You can’t really compare the success he has had in India against our batters because the conditions are so different. It’s not realistic for us to focus on that.” Indeed, Ashwin averages 15.73 against South Africa in India, and 46.14 in South Africa. In Elgar’s follow-through, he tempered his answer with: “He’s one of the best off-spinners India have produced, and we’re mindful of that.” But there could be no mistaking his bracing aggression.

Expect to see plenty of it in the first Test at Centurion on Sunday. There it was again near the end of Elgar’s presser after the media manager listed the names of the reporters who would ask the last questions.

“And then my words are finished,” Elgar said. Through a smile, of course.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.