Now playing where not many want to be …

“I’ve only come to South Africa as a cricketer, but I want to come as a tourist because I want to see a lot of places.” – Chamari Athapaththu

Telford Vice / Cape Town

EAST London is not a good place to be holed up wondering when things are going to get better. Sleepy, windy, small and, worse, smallminded, it’s the kind of town people leave as soon as they’re able to and return to when they’ve run out of options.

But there South Africa were from before last Wednesday until after this Tuesday, stuck in East London waiting for the tide to turn in a wider sense than in the nearby Indian Ocean.

Sri Lanka won the third T20I at Buffalo Park last Wednesday to clinch their only women’s series of any sort in South Africa. The first ODI was played at the same ground on Tuesday, when — Masabata Klaas told reporters from Kimberley on Friday — “it rained, like it always does”.  

The washout left the home side with one win to show after four matches against the Lankans. Another South Africa loss in either of the remaining two ODIs, in Kimberley on Saturday or Potchefstroom on Wednesday, and that series will also be unwon. 

Did East London work its magic on Marizanne Kapp? South Africa’s star player earned a demerit point for her animated send-off of Chamari Athapaththu last Wednesday, and another for, the ICC said on Friday, “using an audible obscenity” after she was dismissed on Tuesday. Those are Kapp’s only breaches of the ICC code of conduct in 24 months. Maybe that what happens when you’re consigned to somewhere so dowdy for seven games in not quite 15 months.

That said, Tazmin Brits left East London with unusually happy memories. Having scored 29 runs in three innings in the T20Is she found her groove on Tuesday to make 116, her second century in 25 innings in the format. Importantly, she hadn’t allowed the dreary weather in the days before the match to get in the way of her preparation.

“Even though it was raining I came to the indoor nets [at Buffalo Park] and I hit a few balls,” Brits told reporters after Tuesday’s game. “And I tried to convince myself that I’m still good enough to make these runs.” She proved that by hitting the first three balls bowled to her, by Achini Kulasuriya, for four. “When I hit those boundaries I thought, ‘Yesterday [a common South African exclamation]! We’re on!”

What might Kimberley deliver? “It’s like Melbourne weather,” Athapaththu told reporters on Friday as the sun blazed. Saturday’s forecast promised more of the same. That should put a shine on another place that is not among South Africa’s most favoured. Neither is Benoni, where the first T20I was played, nor Potch. Such is the lot of women’s teams, who don’t see the bigger venues nearly as frequently as their male counterparts.

Despite that, Athapaththu was enjoying herself: “South Africa is one of my favourite countries. I love this weather and the atmosphere, and especially the hospitality. The people are very nice. The country is very green with a lot of rivers and mountains, and I love the animals. I’ve only come here as a cricketer, but I want to come as a tourist because I want to see a lot of places.”

Her team’s results on this tour might have helped the habitually cheery Athapaththu look on the even brighter side. Sing when you’re winning, they say. Wherever you are.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Change writ large on Buffalo Park’s scoreboard, and grass banks

“They were amazing. We know people want to come and see good cricket, and cricket is also a party in the Caribbean.” – Shai Hope on the Buffalo Park crowd.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

A sizeable chunk of the membership of the Buffalo Club was not happy. How dare Border cricket decide to put up a new scoreboard? And so impede the members’ view of the Indian Ocean, which they could see lapping onto Eastern Beach from their clubhouse’s privileged perch on a hill overlooking Buffalo Park.

It wasn’t enough that the members could watch all the live cricket they wanted in the comfort of their club, and without having to bother with buying a ticket. They wanted the view, too. To hell with spectators who would benefit from being better informed about the match.

The club’s ownership of the ground gave them a false, unpaid for and unearned sense of entitlement and superiority over the wishes and needs of the ticket-buying thousands who thronged the grass banks and stands on big match days.

This was deep in the dark 1990s, when Buffs’ membership was even whiter than the make-up of the teams who played at the foot of the hill and the crowds who watched them. Then, clubs like Buffs, which had until recently been physically, mentally and emotionally ensconced in the bosom of the apartheid establishment, were seen and saw themselves as bastions of the old order.

You want fairness? Democracy? Something closer to unity? What you hoped would soon be reality? Rather join United or Willows in Buffalo Flats and Mdantsane, brown and black areas of East London. And, if you’re white, be satisfied and shut up. Not many years earlier and you would have had the security police asking whether you were a communist or a terrorist, or both — they were the same thing for the goons, anyway — for wanting to play cricket with and against people who were not white. Or the cops would not have bothered to ask before they took you away. Buffs and their ilk was not for you and your ilk. Exactly the same people, and their enablers, among them members of clubs like Buffs, demanded that sport and politics be kept strictly separate. 

So you wonder what the membership of Buffs club thought while they watched the second men’s ODI between South Africa and West Indies on Saturday. These days they keep themselves apart from the hoi polloi not with the help of repressive legislation but with a sturdy fence that runs across the hill horizontally, marking out where the club’s lawns end and Buffalo Park begins. The membership is less white than it used to be but it is still attuned to affluence über alles, even though it can no longer shut itself off from reality.

Only seven of the 24 people — umpires included — who took the field on Saturday were white. Better yet, one black player’s century was followed by another’s: Shai Hope, in his first match as the Windies’ captain, scored 128 and Temba Bavuma made 144, his second hundred for South Africa in as many innings in the wake of his 172 against the same opponents in the Wanderers Test. Both are career-bests for Bavuma.

Many in the crowd were of the same blood as Hope and Bavuma. They availed themselves of the wide expanse of lawn on the outside of the unusually shrunken boundaries in an all-dancing, all-singing carnival of cricket-watching. The magical melody of Zizojika Izinto, an isiXhosa hymn and struggle song, poured through them many more times than once.

The singing and dancing rose and fell and rose again even as it became apparent to these proper cricket people — they and their forebears have been part of the game in South Africa since they encountered it at colonial mission schools in the Eastern Cape hinterland some 180 years ago — that only Bavuma stood between South Africa and defeat. 

It was one thing for Hope to bat with verve through stands of 86 with Nicholas Pooran, 80 with Rovman Powell, and a mad dash of 42 off 22 with Alzarri Joseph; quite another for Bavuma to hobble on one-and-a-half legs — he hurt himself in the field — through 41.2 overs to play with such authority and urgency.

Bavuma and Quinton de Kock put on 76 before South Africa’s captain shared 61 with Tony de Zorzi. Of the 49 realised in the company of Lungi Ngidi, Bavuma scored 36. Ngidi, a tailender’s tailender, was inspired enough to heave Akeal Hosein over midwicket for six. The West Indians, having piled up 335/8 — their highest ODI total against South Africa — probably knew they had the game won, especially as the wickets mounted. But Bavuma kept the possibility of an improbable victory at least half alive.

“The ball before I got out, I said to Lungi, ‘If we can get two 15-run overs here, we can get them to panic,’” Bavuma said during his television interview. Only when he flapped at Joseph and gloved a catch behind, the ninth wicket down, was the issue put beyond doubt. Two balls later South Africa were dismissed 48 short.

Starting with his 109 in an ODI against England in Bloemfontein on January 29, Bavuma has scored three centuries in seven innings for South Africa and twice passed 50 in five trips to the domestic crease. In his previous dozen innings his 65 in the Boxing Day Test at the MCG was his only half-century and his highest score. Where were all the runs coming from? 

“My mind is a lot more clear as to what I’m trying to do and how I’m trying to do it,” Bavuma told a press conference. “I’m feeding off the confidence I’m getting from the players as well as the new coaches [Shukri Conrad and Rob Walter]. I’m just enjoying my cricket.”

Hope, in his press conference, said of Bavuma’s effort: “He deserved to win the game, playing an innings like that. But there can only be one winner.”

Along with Bavuma’s and his own batting, Hope also enjoyed the crowd: “They were amazing. That’s something that we as West Indians appreciate as well. We know people want to come and see good cricket, and cricket is also a party in the Caribbean.”

Little wonder Zizojika Izinto had kept ringing around the ground. The song’s title translates as “Things will turn around”. Up at Buffs Club, the members knew things had indeed turned around. And not only because they could see, instead of waves lapping onto Eastern Beach, the feats of people like Hope and Bavuma writ large on the scoreboard. The Windies captain was wrong: sometimes there’s more than one winner.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Contextless contest for South Africa, West Indies

“You want to keep that good thing going. But you can’t ignore the fact that this is a big year from a 50-over point of view.” – Temba Bavuma says Test success won’t win the ODI series.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

“SMALL earthquake in Peru, no-one killed.” That, junior journalists in South Africa used to be told by grizzled, hard-hearted editors, would be the definitive headline on the definition of a non-story. The men’s ODI series between South Africa and West Indies, which starts in East London on Thursday, presents a sporting equivalent: three games not in the World Cup Super League (WCSL) schedule. What’s the point?

The problem with inventing a mechanism to give cricket context, of which the WCSL is a prime example, is that games that do not fall within its ambit are rendered irrelevant and redundant. Talking about prime examples, this series is exhibit A.

Maybe the closest we can get to a reason for the rubber to be played is that it offers the South Africans time to tune up for their two games against the Netherlands in the coming weeks — which are indeed WCSL fixtures — and the West Indians a chance to accustom themselves to conditions similar to those they will encounter in the World Cup qualifier in Zimbabwe in June and July.

The outcome of another WCSL series, between New Zealand and Sri Lanka on March 25, 28 and 31, has a direct bearing on whether South Africa will qualify directly for the World Cup in India in October and November, or join the Windies in Zimbabwe. There’s a delicious tension in the South Africans playing their first match against the Dutch on the same day — but hours afterwards — that the Kiwis and Lankans complete their rubber.

Both South Africa and West Indies have new normals to get used to in the next few days. Rob Walter will be on hand for the first time as the home side’s white-ball coach. His appointment was announced on January 16, but Shukri Conrad, his Test counterpart, took care of the shop during the ODI series against England in the last week of February. Or while Walter was still in New Zealand, where he had coached since 2016.

Temba Bavuma told a press conference in East London on Wednesday that the transition had been smooth: “The chats are a continuation of what we had during the ODI series against England. As much as Rob wasn’t there, he was interacting and actively involved with the guys. It’s a matter of using that same language and using this opportunity against West Indies to refine our way of playing.”

Shai Hope has played 161 matches for West Indies across the formats, but this will be his first game as captain. Might it unsettle him that the man he replaced at the wheel, Nicholas Pooran, is also in the squad? As is Rovman Powell, Hope’s vice-captain, who has led the Windies in three ODIs and a T20I.

South Africa’s men’s team were last in East London for an ODI in October 2017. West Indies have played only two games of any sort here, most recently an ODI in January 2015. But both teams can rest assured that not much about the conditions has changed. The pitch promises to be slow and the bounce low, and there will be wind. 

Totals of at least 300 have eluded teams in Buffalo Park’s last five list A games, which have delivered two centuries and two hauls of four or more wickets. This is not a place to play pretty cricket, but it does tend to bring out the best in those who win here. Even in matches devoid of context.

When: March 16, 2023; 1pm Local Time (4.30pm IST)

Where: Buffalo Park, East London

What to expect: A sleepy surface that could be granted a spike of life by an 80% forecast for rain on Wednesday night. That’s mitigated by the patchy history of drainage at this ground.

Team news:

South Africa: There’s a lot going on here. Wiaan Mulder and Keshav Maharaj have been withdrawn because of a side strain and a ruptured Achilles. Wayne Parnell, himself a squad replacement for Mulder, has come down with an illness but managed to train on Wednesday. Consequently, Marco Jansen and Tabraiz Shamsi have been added to the squad. Sisanda Magala has split the webbing on his bowling hand. Andile Phehlukwayo is battling lower back spasms. Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortjé have been rested, as has Aiden Markram — but only for the first two games. David Miller, who is playing in the PSL, is available only for the third match.

Possible XI: Temba Bavuma (capt), Quinton de Kock, Reeza Hendricks, Tony de Zorzi, Heinrich Klaasen, Tristan Stubbs, Wayne Parnell, Gerald Coetzee, Lungi Ngidi, Bjorn Fortuin, Tabraiz Shamsi

West Indies: Unlike their opponents, there’s little to report. Everyone in the squad is fit and well and available for selection.

Possible XI: Shai Hope (capt), Kyle Mayers, Nicholas Pooran, Brandon King, Roston Chase, Shamarh Brooks, Rovman Powell, Keacy Carty, Jason Holder, Shannon Gabriel, Yannic Cariah 

What they said:

“You want to keep that good thing going. But you can’t ignore the fact that this is a big year from a 50-over point of view. That’s the main priority.” — Temba Bavuma on transferring Test success to ODIs.  

“The qualifiers are just down the road but the main focus for now is the South Africa series. We definitely need to qualify for the World Cup. Everything we do now is geared towards that.” — Shai Hope outlines the West Indian mindset.

Cricbuzz

East London’s own stars in the grand manner at the SCG

“I’m always trying to come up with different ways to make a bowler think.” — Glenn Phillips

Telford Vice / Sydney Cricket Ground

GLENN Phillips’ hometown is a small, squat city that harbours neither airs nor graces. Plonked onto the coast and just about forgotten, its economy is depressed, its streets littered, its future gloomy, its creativity receding like a middle-aged hairline.

We don’t mean Auckland, where Phillips grew up. We mean East London, between Gqeberha and Durban on South Africa’s east coast, where he was born and which his family left for New Zealand when he was five. 

That might account for the way Phillips bats, especially the grand manner he brought to the SCG on Saturday. His run-a-ball 104 for New Zealand in their T20 World Cup match against Sri Lanka was a cascade of power and innovation, whether he was muscling the bowling through the on side, slap-hitting it softball style past point, running between the wickets as if he had stolen something, or coiling himself into a modified sprinter’s starting stance at the non-striker’s end. And all that on a pitch that offered bowlers movement, grip and variable bounce. It seems you can take East London out of the kid along with taking the kid out of East London.

When Finn Allen and Devon Conway were undone and bowled by the skill and intelligence of Maheesh Theekshana and Dhananjaya de Silva, and a flatfooted Kane Williamson was caught behind off Kasun Rajitha, New Zealand had scored 15 runs in four overs. That they reached 167/7 was due in large part to the stand of 84 off 64 Phillips shared with Daryl Mitchell, to the Kiwis hammering 65 in the last five overs of the innings, and to the Lankans dropping Phillips when he was 12 and 48, when the stand was worth 14 and 65.

Mitchell’s 22 was not quite a quarter of the runs realised in the key partnership. Even so, his effort was his team’s next best score. Phillips told a press conference Mitchell’s contribution shouldn’t be measured in those limited terms: “We didn’t even talk targets. With Daryl it’s very much about intent and being positive. It wasn’t necessarily about hitting fours and sixes because the pitch may not have required that. It was the intent; the running between the wickets. We wanted to show that we had presence, especially with Sri Lanka on top at that stage.

“The way Daryl’s mind works, he doesn’t think anything’s out of reach. He believes he’s born for situations that require tough decisions and tough processes. To have him out there with me in the middle is pretty hard to describe. The momentum and the presence he brings can switch things so quickly.”

Mitchell reciprocated: “It was challenging at the start but it was nice to be able to build a partnership with GP. For him to do what he did was pretty special. You could see by the way both teams batted that the pitch was variable in bounce. The cool thing about playing international cricket is that you’ve got to keep adapting to different situations. He’s got a lot of talent but to do it on a surface like that, I haven’t seen too many better T20 knocks.”

What did Phillips value more, power or innovation? “I’m going to have to say power hitting, but I’m always trying to come up with different ways to make a bowler think. Whether it’s stepping across [the crease] or giving myself a ridiculous amount of room. There’s also a lot of mind games involved, and understanding that once the ball is released power is what I do possess. Some guys would say innovation and are a lot better at it than I am. I try to mix the two together but power is definitely the side that I have to turn to the most.”

Phillips and Mitchell apart, the New Zealanders never came to terms with the conditions and the Lankans’ canny bowling. So they wouldn’t have been confident that they had enough on the board to keep their ambitious opponents in hand. But that question never had to be answered once Tim Southee and Trent Boult had cleared away Sri Lanka’s top four inside four overs with only eight runs scored.

Bhanuka Rajapaksa gave most of the crowd of 15,121 sprinkled around the 48,000-capacity ground something to cheer by clubbing a 22-ball 34. He put on 34 off 23 with Dasun Shanaka, who clipped and crafted 35 off 32. Not that anyone present thought the Lankans would get close after their horror start — including it seems the Lankans, who succumbed to a slew of lofted strokes that fell flaccidly into fielders’ hands.

Sri Lanka were dismissed for 102 with four balls left in the match. Only eight times in their 171 T20Is have they been bowled out for fewer runs. When Southee sent down a legside wide to Rajitha in the 19th to bring up the hundred, the crowd whooped emptily and applauded. Southee also clapped. Boult returned to complete a haul of 4/13, his best performance in his 52 T20Is. What did it mean to him that he was reeling in milestones at the age of 33?

“I don’t know what my career-best was before that, so that’s probably a bit naughty,” Boult said. Only to be contradicted by Mitchell standing next to him: “That’s a lie.” Boult protested: “I don’t know! Who was it against? Hey, I’m still learning.”

For Phillips, Boult was to be admired: “He brings a phenomenal amount of energy. He brings so much skill and temperament. He seems to know what the batter’s going to do before he’s bowled the ball. He’s got so many deliveries under his belt that, when they all come together and things go right, things like 4/13 happen.”

The result took New Zealand to the top of the Group A standings and left Sri Lanka, who have lost twice in three matches, above only Afghanistan. But as the tournament’s only fixture on a weekend night, the match wasn’t much of a contest and not nearly as watchable as some of the other clashes in recent days. The big-hitting, hard-running, ever-thinking Phillips did more than his bit to entertain, but overall the game was about as exciting as a Saturday night in East London.

When last had Phillips been there? “I’ve never had the chance to go back. I thought I was going to go on a tour there but it hasn’t happened yet. I’m really looking forward to the opportunity to go there.” The bubble was there to be burst, but that would have been cruel.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

New old world looms for domestic game

“If your franchise came sixth did it really matter? There was no real consequence. In promotion and relegation there is huge consequence.” – David Richardson on a key aspect of the new structure.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

IF you turned on a television on Sunday and subscribe to the service offered by one of sport’s leading broadcasters, you might have seen something that hadn’t appeared on that platform for almost 15 years. There, live and in living colour on a dazzling Highveld morning, was a South African first-class match.

The coverage in the four-day game between the Titans and the Knights lasted until stumps, and will do until the match is over. SuperSport will also broadcast a game in the last round of the competition, which starts next Tuesday, and the five-day final, which begins on March 25. Banal as those facts will seem, they are extraordinary.

Last time first-class cricket was broadcast live and ball-by-ball in this country Charl Langeveldt had played less than half of his 87 matches for South Africa. He is now their bowling coach. We were days away from Jason Gillespie’s Test double century, Brian Lara’s third appointment as West Indies captain, and the ICC awarding the 2011 and 2015 World Cups to Asia and Antipodea.

It was April 2006, when the Dolphins and the Titans shared the title after somnambulating to a draw in the final at Kingsmead. With that cricket played in whites in South Africa, when it didn’t involve a Test team, disappeared from television. All the while the Lions and the Warriors, et al, have played plenty of one-day and T20 cricket onscreen. But the first-class aspect of the franchise revolution, which hit South Africa in 2004-05 when 11 provincial teams were melded into six newly minted sides with unfamiliar names dreamt up by marketing types, has barely been televised. Thirteen provincial teams have continued to exist, but essentially as feeders for the franchises, which were established through amalgamation. Geographical neighbours Western Province, Boland and South Western Districts formed the Cobras, for instance.         

But from the summer of 2021-22 the franchises will be disbanded and the top level of domestic cricket in South Africa will revert to a provincial model. Boland, Eastern Province, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, North West, Northerns and Western Province will play in the first division. The second division will be contested by South Western Districts, Easterns, Border, KwaZulu-Natal Inland, Northern Cape, Limpopo and Mpumalanga. That won’t change for two seasons. After the 2023-24 campaign the bottom team in the first division will be relegated and the winner of the second division promoted.

The intention of folding 11 teams into six was to narrow the pipeline to the national team, so only the best players would reach the highest level. That argument prevailed over the theory that the game in the country was too big to limit elite playing opportunities to 66. Now it seems the thinking has swung towards broadening the stage to ensure quality talent gets more chances to shine.

It is counterintuitive, then, that the new deal means there will be 75 fewer player contracts on offer. Currently 280 players are signed to franchises. In future the eight first-division outfits will contract 16 players each and the seven second-tier sides 11. That adds up to 205. Jobs will also diminish in the coaching sector, with franchise coaches likely to be put in charge of the major province in their region, thus pushing out some of their provincial counterparts. Administration and other staff around the country could suffer the same fate.

How did we get here? Through a process CSA started in 2016, ostensibly as a way to cut costs. South Africa’s struggling economy has left a smaller slice of the cake for sport than previously. And cricket’s share is crumbling, given its perennial governance problems that have alienated sponsors. With the franchises leaning ever heavily on CSA for financial survival, push has come to shove.

“In the long run we definitely expect the process to save CSA money,” Pholetsi Moseki, CSA’s acting chief executive, told an online press conference on Monday. “More than that we hope that it will allow the affiliates to commercialise themselves better and chase opportunities in the market.” The parents are trying to get the kids to stand on their own two feet. Less kindly, they are kicking them out of the house.

The South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA), which represents the players, necessarily took a different view, as articulated by chief executive Andrew Breetzke: “The Proteas men’s team generates over 80% of CSA revenue. We need to be competing at the highest level, we need to be at the table with the big three, and therefore we need a strong team.” That meant domestic cricket would have to be as healthy as possible. “We need our top players playing, they must be playing in competitive cricket, and the step up to international cricket must be as close as possible. Within that domestic structure we need a strong transformation pipeline. Our teams must represent the demographics of South Africa.” He spoke of the imperative for CSA to be “financially viable and sustainable”, adding ominously: “We have a consistent fear about the financial sustainability of cricket in South Africa and in the world at the moment, for that matter.”

CSA resolved in 2016 to redesign the domestic game, and the last few months have involved deciding who would be in which division. Provinces subjected themselves to a bidding process that was presided over by a four-person committee led by David Richardson, the former South Africa Test wicketkeeper and ICC chief executive. The committee used a scorecard devised by CSA management in consultation with the provinces.

“The committee’s role was to make sure that all the data that was used to populate that portion of the scorecard which evaluated the historical performance and current status of the members across the seven key dimensions was correctly captured and the weightings correctly applied,” Richardson said. “Secondly, the role was to evaluate the future strategies and plans of the members against those seven key dimensions.

“Those dimensions are cricket services and their infrastructure — what are the pathways for developing not only players but also coaches and umpires? What is the structure around the professional team performances; the high performance area? What does their stadium look like? What does their secondary field look like? On the commercial and financial side, what do the revenues look like for the future? What are the commercial plans? What kind of support do they have from other stakeholders such as local government? We also looked at the important dimension of transformation, and how they are structured from a governance and administration point of view, and the finances of each of the members.”

First-division provinces were expected to be “financially self-sustainable, well-structured and administered, producing results on the field, and providing access and quality opportunities for all who play the game”. 

The difference between first and second-division realities is best illustrated by the contrasting fates of Boland and Border. Both are among cricket’s smaller provinces, and both are important in transformation terms. Boland are based in Paarl, where cricket is central to the community, most of whom self-identify as coloured. Outside of South Africa they would be regarded as brown or mixed race. Border are based in East London, which is a hub for many towns and villages where the history of black cricket stretches back more than a century.

But while Boland has thrived through excellent management, headed by chief executive James Fortuin, Border is mired in ethical and financial problems that have spilled onto the field — they were dismissed for 16 by KwaZulu-Natal in a first-class match last week.

“Boland have a tremendous fan base down in their region, especially among the coloured community,” Richardson said. “They have a true love for cricket; there is a cricket culture in the region. They have a stadium of very good quality, and they are very ambitious when it comes to the development of that stadium. Their development pathways are excellent, and they’ve produced results. They have produced players who contribute to the franchise system and their provincial team has done well consistently over the last four years.”

He painted a different picture about Border: “The evaluation committee has no doubt as to the potential of the Border cricket region, and its importance to the overall transformation imperative. Black Africans have played cricket for a long time. They know cricket, they love cricket. A successful Border region is imperative if cricket in South Africa is going to be sustainable in the long run. Unfortunately over the last few years they’ve had issues with governance and administration. Their finances are not strong and their cricket performances are not strong. They are a hotbed of talent and they have contributed players to the franchise system. But I don’t think they’ve fully exploited their potential as yet.” 

In some ways not much will change. The provinces in which the franchises are headquartered — Eastern Province, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Northerns and Western Province — have all earned places in the first division. Effectively, the Knights will become Free State and slough off Northern Cape, their little brother whose players rarely reached the franchise XI. But the new system will be stress tested if bigger provinces, with their cash and cachet, are relegated.

“One of the challenges with the franchise system is that [franchises] went through cycles and stages,” Richardson said. “If you came sixth did it really matter? There was no real consequence. In promotion and relegation there is huge consequence. When you get demoted you have the potential of losing sponsors and financial support.”

That could happen in Cape Town, where it’s not impossible that Newlands’ majesty will be sullied by Western Province slipping down the ranks. The Cobras last won a first-class match in January 2019. They’ve gone three seasons without winning more than half their list A games, and they lost four of their five matches in this summer’s T20 competition. You’re not going to turn on your television to watch that, even if Table Mountain is in the background. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Smaller Mulder bigger factor in SA’s team

“I don’t think I should ever limit myself in terms of dreaming. A dream is, in the end, just a goal. Whether you achieve it or not doesn’t really matter.” – Wiaan Mulder

Telford Vice | Cape Town

TWO big men sat side by side on a couch in a clubhouse on a hot afternoon in Potchefstroom in late September, 2017. There are as many big men in Potch as there are hot afternoons. But this was different. One of the men was Linda Zondi, then South Africa’s convenor of selectors. The other was Wiaan Mulder.

Both leaned forward, elbows on knees. Zondi spoke quietly but intensely for several minutes. Mulder listened intently and nodded. You couldn’t have cut the eye contact with a lightsaber, but the mood was serious without being sombre.

Outside, a South Africa training session in preparation for the Test series against Bangladesh, Ottis Gibson’s first engagement as coach, had just ended. Mulder didn’t play in either of the matches, but the fact that he was with the squad in Potch was Gibson’s doing.

“Young Wiaan Mulder came in, I saw him, I liked him, I spoke to the selectors about him,” Gibson would say a few weeks after he had been at the Wanderers to see Mulder score 79 for the Lions against the Warriors in a first-class match in which he had already taken 4/70. “It was a good opportunity to get him around us in the Test series so he can get a feel for what international cricket is all about.”

Mulder left Potch to play another first-class match, against the Titans in Centurion. He took two wickets and scored 127 not out. Less than a month after that, in October 2017, he made his international debut in an ODI against the Bangladeshis in East London. So that’s what Zondi was telling him: “Hang in there. Your opportunity is coming. Not long now.”

South Africa have had 24 Tests and 43 ODIs since Mulder’s debut, but he has featured in only three Tests and 10 ODIs. He’s played 77 matches of all kinds in that time. Rassie van der Dussen, his Lions and South Africa teammate, has played 136 games during the same period — almost twice as many.

Why, considering South Africa’s search for a quality allrounder since Jacques Kallis’ retirement more than seven years ago, hasn’t Mulder played more international cricket? It’s a fair question in the wake of his performance in the Test series against Sri Lanka. Mulder didn’t have much opportunity to enhance his reputation as a batting allrounder. But he took nine wickets — more than Lungi Ngidi — at an average of 20.55 — better than Ngidi or Anrich Nortjé — and bowled like he belonged: with grit and gumption. Mulder broke three stands of 50 or more and took all but one of his wickets in the top six. He dismissed Dinesh Chandimal twice in the only Test he has played against him. James Anderson has clashed with Chandimal six times in Test cricket, and got him just once.

The reason Mulder hasn’t played more frequently lurked between the lines of the praise Mark Boucher had for him after the series: “Wiaan was always there to make the breakthroughs. He’s been away from the game for quite some time, so he’s very hungry to go out there and perform. Let’s hope he stays on the park. He’s someone who is so keen to learn. His attitude is great. I see a big future for Wiaan. He’s young and he’ll learn, and we’ll keep challenging him in that regard.” 

Mulder turns 23 on February 19, so time is on his side. But already he has had a career’s worth of back and ankle injuries, often caused by a bowling action that sends different parts of his body in competing directions. He’s fixing that, getting stronger, and doing something about his bigness.

“At my under-19 World Cup [in 2016] I weighed 106 kilogrammes,” Mulder told Cricbuzz. “I’m about 83 kilogrammes now.” Soon after the Bangladesh series, that difference of 23 kilogrammes started disappearing. “In the team room we had a skinfold test, and then I had to get on the scale. I looked at what it said, and I was like, ‘That’s the last time I eat pizza or pasta’. That’s what I ate for the whole Bangladesh tour.”

Excess baggage “definitely contributed”, Mulder said, to his slew of injuries. But it wasn’t the most important issue: “I never spent time in the gym in high school. So I just couldn’t manage the load when I got into first-class cricket. It put extra strain on my body. The biggest factor was that I wasn’t strong enough to manage it all.

“Currently I’m not struggling with any back pain, which is quite rare considering the amount I’ve bowled. It’s being managed better. I also used to train too much. When I felt something wasn’t perfect I would just keep working at it. So I used to bowl way too many overs.”

Then there’s his action, which he is remodelling under the experienced eye of Gordon Parsons, the bowling guru at the Lions, his franchise. “My front arm still falls away a bit, and a lot of my energy is still not going in the right direction,” Mulder said. “That forces my front knee to bend and my back leg not to drive through straight. My energy is moving in different directions to where I’m trying to bowl. I’d say I bowled a lot quicker when I was under-19, with my funny action. I’ve lost pace but I’m more consistent.” And he isn’t hurting himself. “That’s the whole point. Hopefully I can get it back up there [in terms of pace], but do so injury-free.”

Mulder first played for the Lions while he was still at school and without grinding out a season or three in provincial cricket, the franchises’ feeder system. Not quite 14 months after his franchise debut he was in South Africa’s dressingroom. Now, slimmed down and bulked up, which is not a contradiction in the finely balanced world of elite sport, he’s where no South Africa team has been since 2007.

Mulder spoke on the same day the squad left for Karachi, and he didn’t try to curb his enthusiasm: “I never thought I’d be going to Pakistan in the near future! It’s flipping exciting! I can’t wait to get on the plane and go and play cricket where there’s been very little international cricket played for a very long time.”

That doesn’t mean Mulder doesn’t know Asian conditions. He has played two first-class matches in India — he scored an undefeated century and took three wickets in an A match in Mysore in September 2019 — and five list A games in Sri Lanka. As an under-19 international he had three Tests in Sri Lanka and 14 one-dayers in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. “I wouldn’t say I know what’s coming, but I think it gives me a better insight that I’ve been to the sub-continent before,” he said.

He is trying to bring that type of clear thinking to his internal conversations abut batting versus bowling: “I’m not over-thinking any of the cricket stuff, because that is a weakness of mine. I love batting a lot. I really enjoy bowling as well, but I would like to contribute more with the bat. In the long run, if I can get more runs and bat more than I bowl, then I think I’ll get the most out of my potential. There will be a time where I have to step up and score runs, otherwise my spot [in the XI] will be under pressure at some stage.”

He’s also trying to keep his interpretation of a changing dressingroom nuanced: “It’s quite a different feel to when I started. My first game, there was Morné Morkel, Dale Steyn, AB de Villiers, Faf du Plessis, JP Duminy, Hashim Amla, Vernon Philander … Being among those guys was, like, wow. You’re in awe all the time. I felt more anxious than I am now — I’m still very anxious — but I think I’ve grown a lot in the last three years mentally. In this team there’s a lot of young guys, so it feels more like you can make an impact.”

Listening to Mulder, it’s difficult not to imagine him pinching himself with each sentence that leaves his lips. Despite his physical struggles, which have added to the challenges all players face on their way to the top, his zest makes him sound as if he’s watching a movie in which he is also starring. The words tumble from him. Not in a torrent but in a stream of what, in a less jaded age, might be called joy. As they should do from someone who is living a life that might yet be worth scripting.

“I don’t think I should ever limit myself in terms of dreaming. A dream is, in the end, just a goal. Whether you achieve it or not doesn’t really matter. But it’s something to work towards. I dream as big as I can. I want to make an impact and contribute to the Test team winning. That’s a big goal of mine — to have a big impact, especially against big opponents. I think that’s what changes the game; if you can make an impact when you’re playing against Australia, India, England, New Zealand, Pakistan; those type of guys.”

Mulder’s movie started long before he played his first game for South Africa, but that episode made a striking scene on its own. He was playing a first-class match for the Lions against the Knights in Kimberley when the call came for him to join the national squad. He would be substituted in the franchise XI, he was told. “I tried to get a not out overnight because then the guy who’s replacing me would get a chance to bat,” Mulder said at the time. He was 18 not out at stumps that day.

Off Mulder went to bigger things, and on debut he trapped Mahmudallah leg-before. Ten days earlier he had dismissed the same player the same way in a tour match. Coincidence? “I remember that was a weakness of his — he was falling over a little bit at the crease. I wouldn’t say I bowled a magic ball and got him lbw. It was more like I tried to bowl one stump straighter. And on those two days it worked. On other days, it might not.” So, no grand plan befitting of genius? “No. I don’t think there ever is. It’s more simple than that.”

But it hasn’t been that simple for Mulder. He grew up in Roodepoort, which was established around what turned out to be an unprofitable gold mine, and went to primary school there. Laërskool Florida is a place of little fanciness where shoes are optional and the lingua franca is Afrikaans, Mulder’s mother tongue. It was a long way from there in every sense to his high school, St Stithians in Sandton, one of Johannesburg’s leafier suburbs which proclaims itself home to Africa’s richest square mile. Saints, as the school is known, speaks English exclusively. But it is also among the 25 schools that have supplied all 111 of South Africa’s Test players since readmission in 1991. Kagiso Rabada — who was three years ahead of Mulder — and David Terbrugge have also walked Saints’ corridors.

“It was a calculated decision from my parents, but they wanted to give me the best chance to make something happen,” Mulder said. Fair enough. But how did he cope with what must have been a culture shock? “That was very difficult in the beginning academically, especially the first two years. I did OK, but coming from not speaking any English and going to school barefoot, that type of thing, to quickly having to change to everything being in English was hard.

“I wouldn’t say St Stithians is a posh school, but it’s a private school. You don’t turn up barefoot at their primary school. I had to adapt quickly and learn that I could do certain things. I had to work really hard on my English.”

Impressive though that is, Mulder is not alone in this regard. Every black South African who goes to a school like St Stithians has to make a similar leap, as do many of the brown South Africans who are first-language Afrikaans speakers. Happily, for Mulder, he had help. Her name is Justine Webber. “I had an awesome English-speaking girlfriend,” he said. “I’m still with her. She guided me through all the English I had to learn and where I was going wrong. If it wasn’t for her I probably wouldn’t be where I am now. She’s an absolute super star.”

Who can say whether Mulder will have a career worth turning into a movie. Not that it matters. Though he is smaller than he was, his role in South Africa’s team, and in his own life, is set to get bigger.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Tyron Henderson, Virat Kohli, Sachin Tendulkar, and the 36 balls that connect them

“I must have bowled a slower ball … or he thought I was quicker than I was!” – Tyron Henderson can’t quite remember dismissing Kevin Pietersen.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

TYRON Henderson, Virat Kohli and Sachin Tendulkar are connected by cricket, but there their association would seem to end. Including his 664 international matches, Tendulkar played 957 first-class, list A and T20 games. Kohli has featured in 681, 416 at the highest level. Henderson played 284 matches, only one of them for South Africa.

While Kohli’s striking face advertises everything from smartphones to steel and Tendulkar is still signing endorsement deals almost seven years after playing his last match for India, not one billboard anywhere in the world offers passersby a look at Henderson’s dazzling smile.

Kohli and Tendulkar each boast more than 30-million Twitter followers. Durban-born, East London-based Henderson, now 45, doesn’t have a Twitter account. As he told Cricbuzz: “I don’t really do much social mediaring.” But he is on Facebook, where he describes himself as the “lawn mower and booze buyer at 2 Swans Bed and Breakfast, Restaurant and Wedding Venue” on a farm.

He was out attending to those duties the first time we tried to reach him. “He’s busy mowing on our tractor,” his wife, Alison Dalbock, said. “As soon as he comes home I’ll get him to phone you.” No doubt Anushka Sharma and Anjali Tendulkar have had many similar conversations with reporters. Not.

Even so, there are dots to connect Henderson, Kohli and Tendulkar. Make that a single dot: in the 2009 IPL in South Africa, they each bowled 36 deliveries. It’s an odd bit of trivia, and not because of the obvious: frontline batters face exponentially more balls than they bowl. In Kohli’s case, more than 28 times as many. Tendulkar faced upwards of four times more deliveries than he bowled. Henderson? He faced 4,640 and bowled 22,483. He sent down almost five times as many balls as he countenanced. But, in T20s, that ratio narrows to just more than twice as many. Henderson was a fast bowler who had more than his fair share of strength, confidence and hand-eye coordination, and he used these attributes to hit lustily. In white-ball cricket, particularly in T20s, that made him an allrounder. 

In 2008 he helped Middlesex win their first T20 title, finishing second among the competition’s wicket-takers, sixth in terms of economy rate, and fifth on the strike rate list. He also scored 281 runs in 11 innings, and only six players had a better strike rate than his 180.12. His 21-ball 59 not out won the semi-final against Durham. In the final against Kent he batted at No. 3 and hammered 43 off 33, and was entrusted to defend 16 off the last over. That seemed a comfortable cushion but Justin Kemp was dropped in the deep off the first ball and a wild throw after the third went for four, squeezing the equation to six off three. Kemp took two off the fourth but missed the fifth. Henderson’s final answer was a superb yorker, which Kemp dug out — bunting the ball straight back to Henderson, who ran out his compatriot to seal victory by three runs.

Exceptional though Henderson’s performance was, it wasn’t surprising. He was named South Africa’s top domestic T20 player for 2004-05, cracked the nod at international level in a T20 against India at the Wanderers in December 2006, and was seriously regarded as the most successful bowler in the format in the world by 2008.      

So how come he played only two games and bowled just 36 deliveries in the 2009 IPL? The question might be better asked of Shane Warne, who captained and coached Henderson’s team, the Rajasthan Royals. “Shane and I didn’t quite click, and that hurt my chances,” Henderson said. “What could I do? I had to sit around. He was in charge. His word was law. He’d say: ‘If I tell you to move, just move. It might be only five paces and I’ll move you back two balls later, but don’t argue. I’m just getting into the batter’s head. I’m not going to do anything different. But he’s wondering what I’m going to do now’. He was very aware of what he was doing and what he wanted to do. That’s what made him one of the best bowlers ever.”

Warne has, in fact, offered an explanation, albeit obliquely, for why Henderson was so under-used. In his autobiography, No Spin, published in October 2018, Warne highlighted a concept he called “the three-second chill” — a short pause players could take even in the intensity of the match situation to set themselves and solidify, mentally, what they were trying to accomplish.

“An amusing insight into the benefit, or otherwise, of the three-second chill involved a batsman, Tyron Henderson, the South African who had a good T20 season at Middlesex in 2008,” Warne wrote. “Manoj [Badale, Rajasthan’s co-owner] had seen him smash it in the English T20, loved his stats and signed him. Before the start of the second IPL season in 2009, Tyron came out to bat in a practice game for us and, first ball, went for an almighty six — he swung so hard he threw himself off his feet, missed it, of course, and lost his middle stump.

“‘Snapey [sports psychologist Jeremy Snape]’ asked him later what was going through his head.

“Oh, mate,’ he answered, ‘I get so nervous, I just swing at the first ball.’

“‘Snapey said, ‘Well, I tell you what you should do, Tyron. Take centre, face up to your first ball and play it properly.’

“Tyron played two games for us, made five runs and got hammered when he bowled. A Manoj beauty at $600,000 a year. But he’d won the English T20 with Middlesex, finishing with a strike rate of 180.12 and 21 wickets at 7.42 runs per over, which is probably why Manoj saw him as a good buy. Go ‘Moneyball’!”    

The passage is riddled with sloppy errors. Henderson was far more a bowler than he was a batter, he in fact scored 11 runs, all in one innings, he had a better economy rate than eight of the 14 bowlers Rajasthan used in the tournament — the captain himself was his team’s third most expensive bowler — and he was sold for $50,000 more than Warne claimed. But it’s the snide tone that stings. Of all the players Warne has shared a ground and a dressingroom with, why would he single out for such unkindness someone as affable and easygoing as Henderson?

That said, there does seem to be more to Henderson’s relationship with Warne than the South African’s slightly grudging respect for the Aussie might reveal. “I never saw him eat,” Henderson said. “He might have a handful of cheese or something small. But he lives on vitamin pills. We went out for supper one night and he didn’t order anything to eat. But he loved the gambling tables.”

Maybe Henderson’s innate modesty grated against Warne’s über ego. Perhaps Warne couldn’t understand, and was thus a touch unnerved, by someone who didn’t take himself entirely seriously all the time. Told the premise for this piece was to track down players who had been on IPL teams’ books but hadn’t seen much gametime, Henderson concurred: “I would be one of those chaps, wouldn’t I.” That didn’t mean the experience didn’t leave him frustrated: “Once, the team said I could go home for a couple of days, that they didn’t need me for a game in Kimberley. And then I get a phone call from Kimberley to say: ‘If you were here you would have been playing; it’s your kind of wicket’. Well, thanks for bloody nothing. I played the first game and the last game, and I sat around for a lot of games inbetween.”

At least he had the satisfaction of dismissing Kevin Pietersen, his only wicket of the tournament. “Did I?” The memory didn’t register even after Henderson was reminded Pietersen had rushed his stroke and been caught at midwicket. “I must have bowled a slower ball … or he thought I was quicker than I was!”

His laughter tailed off as he offered a more sober analysis of what he brought to the party. “My value came in the fact that I could bowl off-cutters, leg-cutters, and I could change my pace. I had pretty good control. I used to change my angles; use the crease and things like that. As a batter I was expendable because whatever happened happened fast — either I got out quickly or, if I got going, we scored lots of runs very quickly. As a bowler I was reliable and dependable. I hit my areas more often than not. I never bowled at the easiest stage of the innings — it was up front and at the death. So I had to have decent control and I think that was my strength. Unfortunately I never got the chance to use it [in the 2009 IPL].”

Rajasthan were champions in the inaugural IPL, but they won only six of their 14 games in 2009 and finished third from bottom and out of the running for the semi-finals. The franchise bought Henderson out of his contract before the 2010 tournament and he didn’t make the shortlist of 60 players who were up for auction. He never appeared in the competition again, and played his last significant match, for Middlesex, in July 2010.

Managed better and treated more fairly, might he have happier memories of the IPL? “Quite possibly, but I wasn’t given much opportunity. Rajasthan and the Deccan Chargers ended up bidding for me at the end of the auction [for the 2009 tournament]. I might have got more games playing for Adam Gilchrist [the Chargers’ captain]. You never know.”

Still, the money Henderson earned came in handy. He and his wife opened what would become an award-winning restaurant on their farm. They bought also an apartment “across the road from Lord’s”. When Middlesex played at home “it took me four minutes to walk from my front door to the changeroom”.

Henderson spoke from the splendid isolation he and his family, which includes 13-year-old Chad, who has spent a good chunk of his childhood breaking batting records at his primary school, have been forced into by their possible exposure to the coronavirus while on holiday in Mauritius. “We’ve been in self-isolation for a week and we’ve got another week to go. When we flew to Mauritius there was absolutely no coronavirus there. Three or four days later they had three cases, all of them people who came back to Mauritius from overseas. On our fifth day there we were changing accommodation. Unbeknown to us, because we don’t speak Creole or French, the authorities had locked down the country from six o’clock that morning. We were on the beach waiting for a woman to bring us the keys for the apartment we were supposed to go into, and the cops chased us off. We were on a flight home at 4pm the next day, all of us wearing masks.”

As it has for all of us, especially in the past few weeks, life has moved on for Henderson. But he hopes cricket will still be part of his: “I do a little bit of coaching. I’ve helped out Border a few times, things like that. I want to do some T20 coaching. That would be a lekker [cool] thing to get involved with.”

If he needs another smidgen of trivia to talk himself into conversations which might help make that happen, there’s this: Henderson shares another distinction with Tendulkar — both of them played only one T20. And this: Tendulkar and Kohli have also dismissed Pietersen. He edged Tendulkar to slip in the 2007 Oval Test and Kohli had him stumped in a T20 at Old Trafford in August 2011. Perhaps Tendulkar and Kohli remember their successes better than Henderson does his.   

Our conversation ended with: “If you’re ever up this side of the world, give us a shout and come and have a steak at our restaurant.” The invitation, it doesn’t need saying, isn’t likely be extended to Shane Warne. And not only because he wouldn’t come hungry.

First published by Cricbuzz.

How to get out of jail? Ask a jailer

“Having watched him, the way he used to bowl, he has given me a lot of confidence as a young player knowing someone like that is now on my journey.” – Lungi Ngidi on Charl Langeveldt.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

IN Charl Langeveldt’s previous life he was a prison warder. So he knows all about getting out of jail. And how to transfer his knowledge of escapology to the bowlers he now coaches. South Africa benefitted greatly from those skills at Buffalo Park in East London on Wednesday, when they won a match they should have lost.

England needed 50 off the last six overs to win the first T20. By then Jason Roy had sent 36 balls careening into the night for his unbeaten 66. Eoin Morgan’s 23 not out had come off 19 deliveries. Both seemed intent on taking their team home with plenty of balls to spare. Surely Joe Denly, Ben Stokes, Moeen Ali, Tom Curran and Chris Jordan would, between them, score what Roy and Morgan didn’t? And without having to resort to Adil Rashid and Mark Wood. So how did England shamble to 176/9? They choked.

“These type of wins, we want to be able to scrape them in the big events,” Temba Bavuma said of the only one-run defeat yet inflicted on England in their 115 matches in the format, and with a view to the T20 World Cup in Australia in October and November. “We know we’re going to be called upon to do that. The best time to start is against top teams like England.”

As big a role as England played in their downfall, it was up to South Africa to do the necessary once the rabbits were frozen in the headlights. Enter Langeveldt. Of the 90 deliveries bowled by South Africa’s seamers, more than half — 49 — were slower balls. Some were off-cutters, some leg-cutters, some tumbled down the pitch out of the back of the hand.

One, quite beautifully bowled by Dale Steyn, was still above Jonny Bairstow’s eyeline in the two metres before it reached him. Then it dropped like a dead pigeon, forcing Bairstow to stab his bat directly downward to keep the damned thing away from his pads and his wicket. Steyn smiled in wonder. Bairstow smiled in desperation. Umpire Adrian Holdstock smiled with relief that he didn’t have to decide whether the ball would have hit the stumps.

Beuran Hendricks wasn’t used until the 15th over. Dwaine Pretorius didn’t bowl at all. That prompted the conservatives — some of them on SuperSport’s commentary team — to protest, even after the match was won. Can they not take yes for an answer? Because they once played international cricket doesn’t mean they understand how international cricket is played now. When next they get the chance to talk to Langeveldt, they could do worse than learn from him so they don’t expose their ignorance and arrogance.

The bowlers won Wednesday’s game; Langeveldt’s bowlers. He forged a career not by bruising batters into submission in the time-honoured South African way but by seizing on the small things — a smidgen of swing, a modicum of movement, an attitude of all’s good — to do big things. He found ways to win matches, particularly with the white ball. Langeveldt’s 100 ODI wickets amount to a touch more than a quarter of Shaun Pollock’s South Africa record of 387. But Pollock bowled 2,571.4 overs and Langeveldt 581.3. That’s 11,941 more deliveries for Pollock, or almost four-and-a-half times as many opportunities as Langeveldt had.

Lungi Ngidi was 14 years old when Langeveldt played the last of his 87 games for South Africa in October 2010. Almost 10 years on at Buffalo Park on Wednesday, a taller, faster, blacker version of Langeveldt, who looked a lot like Ngidi, not only defended seven off the last over but had Curran caught in the deep with an off-cutter and conjured a breathlessly paceless delivery to nail Moeen’s off stump.

“He’s had a massive impact in terms of the mental side,” Ngidi said of Langeveldt’s influence. “Having watched him, the way he used to bowl, he has given me a lot of confidence as a young player knowing someone like that is now on my journey. He has made sure I back the skills that I’m good at. Where someone else would say maybe a change of [the type of] ball was needed or maybe a yorker, [he says] stick to what’s working. And it worked out just fine.”

Langeveldt’s was easily the least heralded of the appointments South Africa made in December. The headlines were reserved largely for Graeme Smith, Mark Boucher and Jacques Kallis. That they had bigger playing careers than Langeveldt is beyond question. They loom larger in the memory of South Africans who remember a time when the game was in better shape. They are the poster boys for an improved present. They carry a heavier share of the hopes for a brighter future. But what do they know about getting out of jail? 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Philander slams CSA suits

“As a player you get to the point where you’ve had enough. We were the last thing they worried about.” – Vernon Philander explains the role the CSA shambles played in his decision to retire.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

CRICKET South Africa (CSA) have been damned by Vernon Philander, who has blamed the suits at least partly for his retirement last month, for the downward spiral in South Africa’s performances, and for forcing him to play in the 2015 World Cup semi-final despite his own doubts over his selection.

Philander made his comments in an interview with Rapport, an Afrikaans-language Sunday newspaper. But they were published internationally for the first time on Wednesday — the same day CSA’s board and members council will meet with all eyes on what they are going to do to halt cricket’s slide into debt, mismanagement, and alarming governance practices. CSA’s shoddy performance is being reflected on the field, where the men’s national team have lost 13 of their 19 completed matches in all formats since the start of last year’s World Cup — including eight of their last nine Tests.

“As a player you get to the point where you’ve had enough,” Philander was quoted as saying. “CSA’s previous management started thinking only of themselves; the players were the last people they worried about. Too many things have gone wrong recently. I had to decide what is the best way forward for me. I’m already [almost] 35 with a good career behind me, but I would have considered playing for longer if it wasn’t for the chaos in our cricket administration.

“The last thing that should happen is that the players are influenced negatively. Luckily there is credibility in CSA again. Hopefully we see a turnaround in the administration and on the field. We must put our heads together and decide in what direction we’re going. Hopefully we can make the road ahead better for the younger guys.” 

In December CSA suspended controversial chief executive Thabang Moroe and appointed the trusted Jacques Faul to succeed him in an acting capacity. In January Graeme Smith came aboard as acting director of cricket with Mark Boucher named head coach and Jacques Kallis and Charl Langeveldt as his batting and bowling consultants. But that didn’t make enough of a difference where it mattered: South Africa won the first Test against England at Centurion in December but lost the other three, and then blew a lead in the drawn ODI series. Were Smith, Boucher and Kallis the answer? “It depends on their management style, because as a player you approach the game very differently than as a coach. We’ll see how they adjust.”

Philander was inadvertently central to one of the most infamous episodes in South Africa’s history in March 2015, when CSA ordered the inclusion of another player of colour in the XI for the World Cup semi-final against New Zealand at Eden Park. The side included only three such players; one fewer than then recommended by the transformation policy. Because of a hamstring injury Philander had played in only three of South Africa’s other seven games in the tournament. But he was pressganged into action at the expense of Kyle Abbott — the team’s best bowler at the event in terms of average, economy rate and strike rate. Philander, clearly some way short of match fit, left the field after bowling eight ineffectual overs for 52. The game was won off the last ball when Grant Elliott launched Dale Steyn down the ground, and the toll exacted by the administrators’ damaging interference was immediately apparent as most of South Africa’s players collapsed to earth emotionally exhausted.

Almost five years on the unhappy saga is still with Philander: “I told the coach [Russell Domingo] blatantly and openly that the best player should play. He told me: ‘You are the best guy for the day, you play’. They weren’t clear an honest with me and Kyle. Lots of stuff definitely happened behind closed doors. When I go to Durban, Kyle and I have a beer. There are no hard feelings between the two of us. But the point is CSA must sort out their issues. What happened there gave both of us a bit of a knock.”

Philander hinted at more meddling from above during the 2019 World Cup, where South Africa finished seventh out of 10 teams: “The administrators were too involved with the game and the players. It was also easier to target Ottis [Gibson, then the coach]. He’s a foreigner, so they could instruct him, ‘Do this, do that’.” Reports were rife that Moroe, then still CSA’s chief executive, had demanded a greater say in team selection.

Somerset have signed Philander as a Kolpak player for this year’s county season. Then what? Smith has made a strong case for retaining his skills in South Africa’s system, but CSA would seem far from securing Philander as a coach: “In successful teams like Australia, England and India former players stay involved. You learn from the older guys’ example and experience. South Africa loses their former players to other countries, where the go and coach. The money is much better. We must decide what we are prepared to pay former players to keep them in the country and ensure that our cricket goes forward again. We have a great need for that now than ever before.”

Philander’s career of 64 Tests, in which he took 224 wickets at 22.32, ended less than happily in the fourth Test at the Wanderers, where England won by 191 runs with a day to spare. He left the field with another hamstring problem after bowling only nine balls in the second innings, and his last act as an international was to hobble out to bat. By then the ICC had taken a dim view of his verbal send-off of Jos Buttler in the first innings — a reprisal for Buttler calling Philander a “fucking knobhead” during the second Test at Newlands.

“I knew there was a microphone behind me; he was dumb enough not to know that,” Philander said of the Newlands incident. What was his retort to Buttler at the Wanderers? “Your game is not good enough; you shouldn’t even be here.”

You could say a lot about Vernon Philander as a Test bowler. But not that.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Anyone for president?

CSA can’t remove Chris Nenzani without exposing their own failures.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

WHETHER push will come to shove for Cricket South Africa (CSA) president Chris Nenzani at a meeting in East London on Wednesday remains unclear, but odds are the game will remain in the control of a deeply damaged and damaging board at least until elections in September. A potential complication is that Nenzani’s presumed successor is apparently not interested in the role.

A quarter of the dozen members of the board have resigned in recent weeks citing mismanagement. Three of them were independent directors. The fourth, Jack Madiseng, is president of the Gauteng board and thus one of the 14 provincial presidents who form the members council — CSA’s highest authority, which has the power to remove the president and indeed the entire board.

Insiders have tapped Madiseng as having designs on Nenzani’s position, but Cricbuzz understands he is unwilling to step up at this juncture. Might he put himself forward at the September elections? The path to the presidency would be less cluttered with obstacles should Nenzani hang on until the end of his term. Even a temporary replacement, if they do a better job, which would not be difficult, could represent a stumbling block for those with ambitions for higher office.

But Cricbuzz has learnt that Gauteng, Western Province and KwaZulu-Natal are supporting a members council bid to truncate Nenzani’s tenure, which started in February 2013, and perhaps also that of Beresford Williams, who has been CSA’s vice-president since February last year. Seven more votes would be needed where those came from: the motion needs a two-thirds majority to succeed.

If, a day before the members council meet, there is still insufficient backing to depose Nenzani, the move — which could involve up to 60 working days of legalistic to and fro between the president and his detractors — would seem unlikely to succeed. But if the bid remains afloat it could be because it has been promised more support at Wednesday’s meeting.

The members council are known to have gathered in Johannesburg on January 24 to discuss the performance of a board who have presided over mounting financial losses, sponsors deserting the game and a slew of staff suspensions, most notably of CSA chief executive Thabang Moroe. But a weakness built into the system is that only five of CSA’s 12 board members are independent. Currently four board members also sit on the members council — by taking action against Nenzani they would effectively be agreeing that their own performance on the board warranted investigation. Even the four board members who have resigned could, in terms of their fiduciary responsibility, still be held liable for decisions taken while they were part of the structure.

A cleaner way for CSA’s board and members council to rid themselves of Nenzani would be to convince him to step down. Nenzani is a master of bloodless but effective debate, so his fellow suits would need strong arguments to persuade him that he is a liability. He would doubtless raise the obvious: the rest of the board are surely either complicit in what has gone wrong or have fallen short of their duty to act in the best interests of cricket. So who are they to point fingers at Nenzani?

Cricketminded South Africans will have a different view — a snake that has had its head chopped off is still a snake. 

First published by Cricbuzz.