Zondo’s story has many chapters

“I’m always nervous, whether I’m playing a club game or my son is throwing balls at me.” – Khaya Zondo

Telford Vice / London

HYDE Park looked like an African savannah on Thursday. Not that lions or lionesses, or indeed cricketers or footballers of any kind, roamed the vast undulations of London’s usually green and pleasant heart. It was too hot for that. Aside from the baroque splendour of its trees, the parched park was a patchwork swathe of beige.

The UK’s most intense summer since 1976 will do that to even the most lush spaces. Like Lord’s, less than three kilometres to the north, where the Test series between England and South Africa starts on Wednesday. What has the heat done to pitches at cricket’s grandest ground?

Not the obvious and helped the spinners, it seems. They have claimed only 18 of the 186 wickets to fall there in first-class matches this season. That includes the Test against New Zealand in the first week of June, when Lancashire leg spinner Matt Parkinson had to come haring down the highway to make his debut as a concussion substitute for Jack Leach.

Parkinson had Tim Southee caught at slip in New Zealand’s second innings — the only wicket of the 35 that fell in the match that belonged to a slow bowler. No spin was bowled in either team’s first innings, and only 18.3 overs in the 170.2 overs bowled in the second innings. In the most recent first-class match at Lord’s, between Middlesex and Sussex three weeks ago, spin accounted for three of the 29 wickets and 54 of the 365.1 overs. If mad dogs and Englishmen really do go out in 2022’s midday sun, not many of them are spinners.

According to Southern Water, this region of England had less than two-thirds of its average rainfall for the first six months of 2022 and only four millimetres in July — when the long-term average is 50.3 millimetres. Temperatures have hovered around 30 degrees Celsius for weeks, and the rain that has been forecast for next week will come — if it comes — as a relief to everyone except cricket aficionados who have turned their attention to Lord’s.

Doubtless Khaya Zondo isn’t thinking about any of the above. For one thing, he’s not in London. For another, he can’t do anything about the weather. For still another, he is focused on staying in the selection frame for the first Test. He did that on Tuesday and Wednesday by batting for more than three hours for his 86 in a tour match against England Lions in Canterbury. It was the South Africans’ biggest innings in terms of runs and deliveries. Importantly, Zondo showed a level of patience that earned 130 dot balls from the 166 he faced. He was undone on the second morning without adding to his overnight score, when he left an inswinger from Sam Cook and had his off stump rattled.

“I’ve accepted my limitations,” Zondo said in an audio file released by CSA after the close on Tuesday. “I’ve also accepted where I am good and I’ve just kept working, trying to get better with each ball I face, just keep adding building blocks on top of each other.” 

The first of those blocks was laid during practice — “I went into the nets and worked on my balance, worked on playing the ball late” — to help him adjust to the conditions: “It’s definitely different to South Africa. The ball nips a lot more, and you never really feel like you’re in; you’ve got to make sure you’re always awake. As soon as you think you’re comfortable, that’s when the ball does something you don’t expect it to do and that’s when it catches you off guard.”

After 213 first-class innings, he was not immune to anxiety: “I’m always nervous, whether I’m playing a club game or whether my son is throwing balls at me. So I’m always nervous when I pick up a bat. That’s good nerves.”

Zondo scored two half-centuries and a century in nine innings for Darwen in the 2015 editions of the Northern Premier League and the Lancashire Cricket Board Cup. He last played in England on South Africa A’s tour in May and June 2017, when he made 66 runs in four 50-over innings and a single in each trip to the crease in a four-day match. His effort this week is his best anywhere since he reached a career-high 203 not out in a domestic first-class match in October 2021. In eight subsequent innings in the format he has twice passed 50.

Zondo’s latest effort has complicated South Africa’s selection deliberations. He batted at No. 7 with Ryan Rickleton, Rassie van der Dussen and Aiden Markram above him. All could be competing for one place in the Test XI. Markram made 10 and Van der Dussen 75 in the first innings, and they were 20 and eight not out at stumps on Thursday. Rickleton suffered a first-baller on Tuesday.

The naked numbers say Zondo has done the most among them to crack the nod, but rarely are these matters so simple. Markram played himself back into confidence and form at the IPL, and just more than three weeks ago Van der Dussen, a reassuring presence in South Africa’s line-up, scored a yeoman 134 in extreme heat in the first ODI in Chester-le-Street. Rickleton reeled off two centuries, a 95 and three half-centuries in eight first-class innings for Northamptonshire in June and July.  

You might have heard Zondo’s name mentioned for reasons other than his achievements on a cricket ground. In October 2015 he was, at then captain AB de Villiers’ insistence — and with the acquiescence of Hussein Manack, the selector on tour — left out for the deciding match of an ODI series at the Wankhede. CSA investigated and decided his omission was wrong, and Zondo’s testimony to the Social Justice and Nation Building project in August last year revealed how deeply affected he had been by his treatment.

“I switched off mentally for the rest of the day and I detached myself from the team because it was clear I was not wanted,” Zondo said. “Switching off helped me cope with everything that was happening. The hardest part was watching players who were selected ahead of me having the opportunity to shine for South Africa on a world stage, in India, and having a chance to play and potentially impress and get future IPL opportunities.”

Dean Elgar’s flight to India for the subsequent Test series was brought forward to enable him, rather than Zondo, to feature in the white-ball decider. It is not often remembered that South Africa piled up 438/4 in that match, with Quinton de Kock, Faf du Plessis and De Villiers all scoring centuries, and also largely unhighlighted that the visitors won by 214 runs. Neither is it recalled that Elgar took guard at No. 7 with four balls left in the innings, faced only two of them and finished five not out. Was Zondo, albeit then uncapped, honestly not trusted to do something similar, or better?

If you’ve heard Zondo’s name for still another reason, it might be because his father, Raymond Zondo, was appointed South Africa’s chief justice in March. In June 2017 Zondo senior was named as the presiding high court judge in an inquiry into allegations of state capture and corruption during Jacob Zuma’s tenure as president from May 2009 to February 2018. In a damning and shocking report that runs to more than 5,000 pages, Zondo found that “the [ruling party] ANC under Zuma permitted, supported and enabled corruption”.

Zondo junior and the rest of South Africa’s squad have found in England circumstances that will feel oddly familiar to them. They are no strangers to the water restrictions that are being implemented here, and the planned power outages that loom because of the surge in energy prices — prompted by Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine — are common on the sharp tip of Africa.

Then there are the dots connected by history. When the English refer to 1976 as their last properly hot summer, they’re not only talking about the weather. In the build-up to a Test series that year, Tony Greig said of his team’s imminent opponents: “You must remember that the West Indians, these guys, if they get on top are magnificent cricketers. But if they’re down, they grovel, and I intend to make them grovel.”

Greig’s words, spoken in the thick, rough accent of the Eastern Cape of his birth, where he had leaned on his privilege and the luck of having a Scottish father to make the leap to England, did not land well. A white South African who had failed to denounce apartheid or racism telling black people he wanted to make them grovel?

Michael Holding and Andy Roberts answered the question on behalf of millions worldwide by taking 28 wickets each in the series, and Viv Richards and Gordon Greenidge by scoring three centuries each. And they were only the brightest stars in West Indies’ 3-0 triumph. 

Also in 1976, indeed during that series, South Africa’s winter was turned white hot by government’s insistence that Afrikaans — the language of the country’s oppressors — be used in black schools. The reaction was what became known as the Soweto Uprising, which killed between 176 and 700 mostly young people and lit the touchpaper for what became, in 1994, the defeat at the ballot box of apartheid.

Raymond Zondo was 16 when Soweto’s flames were lit, and almost 34 when Nelson Mandela became South Africa’s first rightfully elected president. Khaya Zondo is 32 and still fighting for fairness. Will he get it on Wednesday? And, if he does, will it rain? In Africa, that would be a blessing. But not at Lord’s.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

5 months, $463K, 235 pages, and for what?

The SJN report doesn’t tell us much more than what we already know: there is racism in South African cricket.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

WITH Virat Kohli and the BCCI apparently at odds over the who, what, when, where and why of the change of leadership of India’s white-ball teams, and Josh Hazlewood out of the next Ashes Test, most of the world’s cricketminded citizens might have missed the release of the Social Justice and Nation-Building (SJN) report on Wednesday.

In South Africa, the headlines were dominated not by what the SJN had to say about racism in cricket, nor by Elon Musk — once of Pretoria — being named Time Magazine’s Person of the Year, nor even by Omicron’s grim march through the population: 23,857 new cases of Covid-19 were reported on Tuesday.

Instead, the nation was tuned acutely to news generated by Jacob Zuma being ordered to return to jail in the wake of his medical parole being declared unlawful. In June, Zuma, South Africa’s president from 2007 to 2017, was sentenced to 15 months in prison for refusing to comply with a court order to testify at the Zondo Commission, which is investigating the corruption that captured the country during his tenure. It took Zuma eight days to surrender to police. For the next eight days, his supporters — or so they claimed to be — went on a rampage of looting and destruction that killed 342 and is estimated to have cost South Africa the equivalent of between USD2.2-billion and USD3.1-billion. Zuma was granted medical parole on September 5 — a decision that was struck down in court on Wednesday, which means he is due to go back to jail. He has, as is his wont, appealed. That will keep him free for now. But what, millions of South Africans are thinking, will his supporters do if he is put back behind bars?

So you will have to excuse us for not being entirely focused on the SJN’s report on Wednesday. As it turns out, we didn’t miss much. It took five months, the equivalent of USD463,000 and as many as 235 pages for the SJN to tell us, essentially, that cricket in South Africa is riven by racism. Any South African who knows a googly from a thigh pad could have done the same in an instant, for free, and in one short sentence. Actually, any South African could have done exactly that about any aspect of South African society. Here’s how: South Africa is riven by racism.

The pro-Zuma looting was fuelled, at least in part, by the country’s chronic inequality. But it’s not all black versus white — Raymond Zondo, South Africa’s acting justice, who is presiding over the Zuma investigation, has a son you know of if you’re a cricket person. Or if you’ve paid attention to the SJN hearings. That’s right: Khaya Zondo.  

What the SJN didn’t tell us is what should be done about racism in cricket. Should CSA fire Graeme Smith and Mark Boucher as director of cricket and the men’s team’s head coach? Or suspend them? Or send them for diversity training? How do we stop black and brown players from not being given a fair shake in the game? How do we stop whites from regarding themselves, in ugly, damaging ways, as cricket’s norm? If you had waited five months, spent USD463,000 and waded through 235 pages, you would expect at least an attempt to answer questions like those.

The closest the report gets to floating an actionable idea is to call for the office of the transformation ombud to be made permanent. On the strength of what that office has produced so far, why would CSA do that? So they can keep paying someone to tell them there is racism in cricket? If the SJN was an umpire asked to consider an appeal, it would refuse to give the batter out, or to say they were not out, or to refer the decision upstairs. 

You have to read between the lines of the report to see its most disappointing failures. It seems to say that black and white players choosing to share minibuses and hotel rooms along racial lines is nothing other than a matter of personal choice. How is that phenomenon not an alarm about the state of our wider culture? How is it not recognised as a symptom of deep and worrying dysfunction?    

Puzzlingly, considering the SJN’s mandate, the report takes aim at the processes by which Smith and Boucher were appointed, in December 2019. It seems Smith was all but assured of his job even before the three other shortlisted candidates — two of whom was were white — were interviewed. That would be a problem of governance, among the many committed under the watch of Chris Nenzani and Thabang Moroe, then CSA’s president and chief executive. The report slams Smith’s appointment as “irregular, irrational and unfair”. Nenzani and Moroe are black, as were most of the people involved in bringing Smith on board. Where is the racism — which is what the SJN was supposed to be all about — in that?

Similarly, it was Smith’s prerogative to choose the national teams’ coaching staffs. He should have foreseen that overlooking Enoch Nkwe, who is more qualified as a coach than Boucher and took the side to India in an interim capacity in November 2019, in favour of Boucher would raise questions over his commitment to transformation and of his grasp of CSA’s policies. But it wasn’t as if Smith alone appointed Boucher. The decision would have had to be ratified by a range of officials, most of them black or brown. To call it racist is plainly wrong.

It is not wrong to be frustrated and angered by the conveyer belt of whiteness into the highest echelons of South African cricket, where a cradle to grave system cushions some from the real world while locking many out of it. Again, if you’re a South African from any walk of life you are no stranger to this. If you’re born into the right kind of white family which lives in the right kind of neighbourhood and you can therefore attend the right kind of school, you’re going to have to be the wrong kind of cricketer not to forge a professional career. If you’re born into other kinds of families, no matter how talented you are chances are you will be unfairly denied those advantages. AB de Villiers is who he is at least as much, maybe more so, because of the accident of being born white as he is because of his outrageous talent and his hard work to make the most of his gifts. And, as we have heard at the SJN, even a judge’s son like Khaya Zondo can be frozen out of cricket’s white world because he is black. 

Similarly, there are too many whites in cricket’s top jobs. Whingeing about the way they got them isn’t going to change that. It’s only going to make labour lawyers richer. What’s needed is to stop the conveyer belt, and to make it impossible for whiteness to ignore blackness and brownness. The law is on the side of those who want to make that happen, as it should be. But let’s entertain, for a moment, the craze for recklessness. Fire Smith! Fire Boucher! Right. Now what? The Test series against India starts on December 26. Good luck. 

That kind of myth-making also looks past the truth that, when Smith and Boucher were appointed, cricket in South Africa had bottomed out in every measurable sense. It’s not as if they messed up a good thing. Rather, they helped rescue what was left.

That does not absolve them from their duty to make cricket a better place, whether they are players, coaches or administrators. They don’t seem to have been good at that as players. So they have two strikes left; two big strikes. What happens on the field is less important than the structures and processes that put those people there. Because real change is effected long before they step over a boundary, and from there into an important administrative role. What we see from the stands and on our televisions is the destination, not the journey. How do we get there?

CSA does a lot to try and give worthwhile answers to that question. So much work is being done, with integrity, for the good of the game and those who play and follow it. So it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that cricket deserves better than this report. It didn’t help the SJN do a proper job that, having been implicated, Smith and Boucher chose not to testify in person but to throw lawyerly affidavits at the problem. It also didn’t help that Makhaya Ntini, Hashim Amla and Vernon Philander — giants of the game, as well as black and brown players — did not involve themselves. There’s a word for what those five players chose to do, and not to do: privilege.

Many of us have it. It’s what we do with it that matters.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.