Questions abound over Teeger’s removal as captain

“It wasn’t anyone else’s decision or influence, but CSA’s decision based on the updated risk report.” – Pholetsi Moseki on David Teeger being axed as captain.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

ON the face of it, the threat of mob violence has led to David Teeger being stripped of the South Africa captaincy for the men’s under-19 World Cup, which starts next Friday. Questions abound.

Should spectators be worried about their safety if that of a supposedly well-protected player could be at risk? How is Teeger less of a lightning rod for potential tumult as a player than as the captain? Did CSA feel they had no choice considering the charges of genocide that South Africa have laid against Israel at the UN’s International Court of Justice? What if the mob who have got their way are CSA? 

A CSA release on Friday didn’t provide many answers. It said Teeger had been “relieved of the captaincy for the tournament” in the “best interests of all the players, the … team and David himself”.

Why? “We have been advised that protests related to the war in Gaza can be anticipated at the venues for the tournament,” the release said. “We have also been advised that they are likely to focus on the position of the … captain, … Teeger, and that there is a risk that they could result in conflict or even violence, including between rival groups of protestors.”

That happened in Cape Town on November 12, when police used stun grenades and water cannons to quell rival sections of the crowd; some supporting Israel, others Palestine. Four people were arrested.   

How did we get here? On October 22, when the Israeli Defence Force had killed 4,651 Palestinians in their asymmetrical war on Gaza waged in retribution for Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack that cost 1,139 Israelis their lives and saw more than 200 taken hostage, Teeger dedicated an award he won to “the state of Israel and to every single soldier fighting so that we can live and thrive in the diaspora”.

Unsurprisingly, outrage followed — enough to prompt CSA to ask Wim Trengove, a respected senior counsel, to conduct an independent investigation to decide whether Teeger had breached the organisation’s code of conduct. In a report that ran to 20 pages, comprised 5,482 words, and was released by CSA on December 7, Trengove cleared Teeger. The next day, CSA named South Africa’s under-19 World Cup squad with Teeger as captain. If there was a moment for Teeger to rescue the situation by apologising and making clear he knew he represented all South Africans, not only those who agreed with him, and would endeavour to do so better in future, that was it. He hasn’t.

Maybe that failure prompted a pro-Palestine protest outside Newlands on January 3, the start of the second men’s Test between South Africa and India at the ground, where the slogans shouted included, “Teeger, how many doctors did your friends kill today?”

Doubtless more of the same will follow at the under-19 World Cup, regardless of whether Teeger is in the XI. Will he play? His return of 47 runs in four innings in the triangular series against India’s and Afghanistan’s under-19 teams in Johannesburg in the past two weeks should call into question his place in the side.   

The way the saga has been dealt with differs markedly from that involving Usman Khawaja, who has been blocked at every turn by the ICC and their regulations from conveying messages on his playing kit during matches for Australia to highlight his concern over the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza. He was even charged for wearing a black armband — which he said was for a personal bereavement — without obtaining the requisite permission. Good thing Khawaja hadn’t voiced his support for an invading army. He has since worn a depiction of a dove and an olive branch — symbols of peace — on his boots during the BBL, which as a domestic tournament is not under ICC jurisdiction.

On Friday, Cricbuzz asked Pholetsi Moseki, CSA’s chief executive, when the decision to take the captaincy from Teeger was made, whether it was a board decision or another authority’s, whether spectators should concerned about their safety, and how Teeger would be less at risk of sparking controversy as a player compared to as captain?

“We won’t be commenting further than the statement,” Moseki said. “We explained in the statement why it was necessary to make this call. But I can assure you it wasn’t anyone else’s decision or influence, but CSA’s decision based on the updated risk report.”

Already the theory has taken flight that CSA’s board, unhappy at Trengove’s decision, looked for another way to sack Teeger. The board has been overhauled and restructured in the wake of Chris Nenzani’s disastrous leadership, which ended amid a governance crisis in August 2020. But they have had to retain some of the freeloaders and incompetents of that unhappy era. Non-independent directors elected from the dubious ranks of the presidents of the provincial affiliates are among them. They tend to try and ingratiate themselves with every avenue of power and influence on offer — including that emanating from government types, who have sent a pack of lawyers to the Hague to take on Israel’s rampant aggression. Cricbuzz has learnt that it was indeed CSA’s board who axed Teeger as captain.

The relevant parties were informed on Friday morning. At least that decision wasn’t made known on Thursday. Because, at the centre of this mess, albeit self-created, is a human being who has made mistakes, will make more, and would do well to learn from them. His name is David Teeger, and he turned 19 on Thursday.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Earth to Steve Waugh, and other self-appointed guardians of Test cricket: stay in your lane

“We are just players and we can fight and promote as much as we can, but it’s up to the powers that be to make the right calls for us.” — Dean Elgar on the future of Test cricket.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

PAT Cummins’ CA contract is worth more than double what CSA pay Quinton de Kock, Kagiso Rabada, David Miller and Aiden Markram combined. Steve Waugh, sitting on a pile of 168 Test caps in the privilege of his developed world ivory tower, should think about that before he shoots his mouth off.

“Obviously they don’t care,” Waugh was quoted as saying by the Sydney Morning Herald on Monday in response to South Africa selecting seven uncapped players, including Neil Brand, as captain, in their squad of 14 to play two men’s Tests in New Zealand next month. The matches clash with the second edition of the SA20, which CSA’s contracted players are required to make their top priority — ahead, even, of international commitments.

A CSA statement on Tuesday sought to “reassure the fans that CSA has the utmost respect for the Test format as the pinnacle of the game we love”. It made the valid point that “the dates for this tour were set when the Future Tours Programme for 2023 to 2027 was finalised in 2022. The window for the SA20 had not been determined at that stage.”

What was done to try and avoid the problem? “We made every effort to find another mutually suitable time-slot … in consultation with NZC. Regrettably the constraints imposed by the global cricket calendar rendered this impossible, as the games must be played before April 2025 as part of the WTC.”

The SA20 is financially more important than most of the international cricket South Africa play because, besides tours by India and ICC disbursements, it is CSA’s only profitable project. The tournament is designed as South African cricket’s gift that keeps on giving annually. Without it, because of rampant mismanagement by previous administrators, the game could go out of business in this country. But, where Waugh sat, that didn’t seem to matter. 

“If I was New Zealand I wouldn’t even play the series,” he said. “I don’t know why they’re even playing. Why would you when it shows a lack of respect for New Zealand cricket?”

He warned that if “the ICC or someone doesn’t step in shortly then Test cricket doesn’t become Test cricket because you’re not testing yourself against the best players”. Waugh conceded that players are “not getting paid properly”, and he offered a remedy in the form of a “regulation set fee for Test matches” to be footed by the “ICC or the top countries who are making a lot of money”. It’s a useful idea, but it wouldn’t solve the central problem of uneven contracting between countries: the rich would still be richer, the poor poorer.  

Whether Waugh counted Australia among those “top countries who are making a lot of money”, and who should thus help out, wasn’t made clear. But there can be no doubt he was referring to India — whose board, the BCCI, will keep 38.5% of the ICC’s earnings from 2024 to 2027. No other ICC member’s percentage is in double figures. But India earn more than 80% of that money. Considering their status as financial giants of the world game, did India have a greater duty to ensure the future of Test cricket than other countries?

Asked exactly that question at a press conference at Newlands on Monday, the day before the start of the second Test, Rohit Sharma said India did indeed have that responsibility. Then he backtracked to a neutral position. “I think so; absolutely,” Sharma said. “Test cricket is something that we all have to protect and give importance to. It’s just not one or two countries’ responsibility. It’s all the nations who are playing. It’s their responsibility to make sure that we keep it entertaining. Around the world a lot of solid Test cricket is being played, which is good. It’s everyone’s duty to make sure that it stays nice and healthy and it stays competitive. It’s everyone’s responsibility.”

What did he make of CSA’s actions? “For me Test cricket is the ultimate challenge and you would want to see the best players playing in that format,” Sharma said. “Everyone has their own problems to deal with. I am pretty sure there is a reason behind it. I don’t know what the reason is, but definitely Test cricket is something we want to see — the best cricket being played and having your top players available.

“I don’t know what the internal talks and discussions are in CSA. From my perspective, I think it’s important that there is priority and thought given to Test cricket because it’s the ultimate challenge that you face in this sport. And you want to be challenged every day. Luckily we don’t have those kinds of problems to deal with at this point in time.”

Note Sharma’s absence of sanctimoniousness, which Waugh wasn’t short of: “History and tradition must count for something. If we stand by and allow profits to be the defining criteria the legacy of Bradman, Grace and Sobers will be irrelevant.” Michael Clarke, too, leapt onto a high horse to declare that “no domestic competition should come in front of” Test cricket, without any apparent understanding of the reality of the situation. 

Happily, not all Australians have appointed themselves grandiose guardians of the global game. “If I was a player from another nation and getting paid OK to play international cricket, [and] I’m getting paid a truckload more to play T20 cricket, I’m sorry but I’m going to be playing the T20 cricket,” Usman Khawaja told Fox Cricket. “I love playing for my country, but it is also a case of looking after your family, doing things right. If two people get paid to do the same job and you’re getting paid twice as much at one firm and half at the other firm, you’re going to pick the one you’re getting paid [more] for.”

In other words, if Bradman, Grace and Sobers, and indeed Waugh and Clarke, had been made better offers, what would they have done? Dean Elgar doesn’t have to wonder about that. He was South Africa’s captain in March 2022, when CSA told their players to choose between the IPL and a Test series against Bangladesh.

“It’s a tough one leaving that up to the players, but this is how we’ll see where their loyalty lies,” Elgar said at the time. “They mustn’t forget that Test and one-day cricket got them into the IPL, not the other way around. You don’t want players to miss out on a big occasion like the IPL, by no means. But I’d still like to think playing for your country is bigger than that.” Despite that, Rassie van der Dussen, Aiden Markram, Kagiso Rabada, Lungi Ngidi, Marco Jansen and Anrich Nortjé all went to the IPL.

How did Elgar feel now, on the cusp of his last Test? “Speaking to the guys in the changeroom, especially the younger guys, they still very much live for this format,” he said on Tuesday. “Maybe the team they’ve selected to go to New Zealand isn’t ideal for … how I view Test cricket. But there’s still a lot of hunger among the guys who are going to be playing. What’s happened is out of our control; it’s out of the players hands, it’s out of our coaches hands, and our team management’s hands.

“It’s a little bit sad that it has gone into that direction. We just need to focus on what we can focus on. What’s happening behind the scenes is not for players and coaches to fight and kick up a storm about. It is what it is and we just have to move on.”

Was he happy to be bowing out before he had to make that kind of compromise more often? “The future is up to administrators making right decisions for players and the longevity of format, especially our Test format,” Elgar said. “Us as players just need to go out and win and show the hunger for this format. As long as I am around, I am going to be a Test fanatic. A lot of our guys are, too.

“Opportunities need to come our way. Otherwise the conversations are going to be continuous and you are never going to put it to bed. We are just players and we can fight and promote as much as we can, but it’s up to the powers that be to make the right calls for us. I would like to see younger guys coming through and experience what I have experienced over 12 years. Hopefully there’s sanity around the decisions going forward.”

Like Waugh, Elgar is an old-fashioned cricketer. Unlike Waugh, who played his last game of cricket more than a year before the first T20I and almost four years before the IPL explosion, Elgar is part of the modern game. Waugh is out of touch, and has veered out of his lane. The slow lane. As a bona fide great, he will be tolerated and forgiven. This time.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Anti-social elements in Shamsi’s sights

“You need to behave like a human being. You can’t carry on like an animal.” – Tabraiz Shamsi on social media abusers.

Telford Vice / Centurion

TABRAIZ Shamsi has revealed that his celebration after dismissing Suryakumar Yadav earned him and his wife online abuse — and has called for more vocal opposition from those who suffer violation on the web. But his own experience could serve as a cautionary tale for those considering raising their heads above the electronic parapet. 

As he has done several times in the wake of taking a wicket, Shamsi removed a boot and held it to his ear — as if he was talking into a phone — after he had Yadav caught at long-off during the second T20I at St George’s Park on December 12. Some India fans, Shamsi said, did not appreciate the gesture.

“People took it in a negative way; they thought it was disrespectful,” Shamsi told Cricbuzz. “I had so much abuse hurled at me. It was probably the worst it’s ever been. There was also abuse hurled at my wife. I didn’t appreciate that. It’s uncalled for. It’s fine if you want to have a dig at the players, but to involve family and say nasty things, that pushes it to another level.

“I feel that if players don’t say anything about it, then people think they have free licence. More people need to speak up and say it’s not OK. Yes, we’re all trying our best. Yes, your team might not win or you might not agree with certain things. But you need to behave like a human being. You can’t carry on like an animal.”

Shamsi took to social media the day after the Gqeberha match to respond to his detractors, writing: “It’s just a fun celebration which a lot of kids enjoy and means no disrespect towards the batter. All you guys hurling abuse are just giving other genuine cricket-loving fans from your country a bad name.”

Far from quelling the matter or furthering the debate, Shamsi’s post earned him more doses of vicious bile. “Motherfucker don’t ever try to do this in front of Indian players,” one reaction read. “We will put your attitude in your ass. Don’t try to ruin your career. Keep your attitude and arrogance in your pocket. Bowlers like you are available in pedestrian [areas] on every corner of India. So shut up. Just shut up.” Another advised Shamsi to “stay within your limits” and said he was “like a worm licking the shoes of the Indian team”, adding, “you are a motherfucker”.

Shamsi acknowledged public figures were on the wrong side of the social media equation: “People know that because we are sportsmen we can’t really say anything back, and they take advantage of it. I’m never shy to express my opinion, so from time to time I let people have a piece of my mind — if they’re stepping over the line. But you can never win that battle.”

That didn’t stop him from joining the discussion about the ICC’s stymieing of Usman Khawaja’s attempts to raise awareness about Israel’s asymmetric war on Gaza. The ongoing bombardment has claimed the lives of more than 20,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, in retribution for Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack that killed 1,200 Israelis and saw more than 200 taken hostage.

Khawaja was warned off wearing boots inscribed with “all lives are equal” and “freedom is a human right” — as he has done at training sessions — during the first Test against Pakistan in Perth, lest that breach the ICC’s rules on perceived “political, religious or racial” messaging by players. Then he was charged with breaching clothing and equipment regulations for wearing a black armband in the same match. Khawaja said the armband denoted a “personal bereavement”. The ICC said he had not obtained permission to wear it, and refused his request to wear an image of a dove — a symbol of peace — on his bat during the second Test at the MCG.

Shamsi posted: “I would like the ICC to explain what exactly has [Khawaja] done wrong? Why the double standards?” Many cricketers have taken a knee in support of Black Lives Matter (BLM) — West Indies still do, and wear a BLM logo on their collars — and Marnus Labuschagne has a stylised eagle on his bat, representing his favourite bible verse.

“For those that hope in the Lord, he shall renew their strength,” the verse reads. “He shall soar on wings like eagles. He shall run and not grow weary and talk and not be faint.” Here’s hoping that reaches Gaza.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

SCG fightback a drop in South Africa’s bucket of woe

“We want to be successful all around the world. We don’t want to be a team that only wins at home.” – Malibongwe Maketa

Telford Vice / Cape Town

THIS time last year cricketminded South Africans were as buoyant as a balloon in a sunny park. It was two days after their Test team had beaten top ranked India in a gnarly contest at the Wanderers and three days before the series decider at Newlands. There was admiration, respect and hope.

Maybe Keegan Petersen could and would fill the immense void left by Hashim Amla. Maybe Marco Jansen was more than just outrageously tall and left-arm. Maybe Dean Elgar was the answer to the questions that had been asked since Graeme Smith retired. Maybe people should get off Mark Boucher’s case and let him coach. 

A year on and that balloon seems to have been made of lead and the sunny park has become a swamp in a hurricane. South Africa won at Newlands, reducing no less than Virat Kohli into an impotent caricature shrieking into the stump microphone. But they have lost five of the 10 Tests they have played since, including four consecutively before Sunday’s rain-forced draw in Sydney. In the process they lost a rubber in Australia for the first time in the four they’ve played there from 2008/09.

The cumulative effect of South Africa’s recent failures is that their performance on the last day at the SCG, where they resumed on 149/6, then followed on after being dismissed 220 behind, and reached 106/2 before hands were shaken, has been held up as a turning point towards better days.

“We actually had a conversation last night: we can either go lie down and let Aussie roll us here and create a little bit more embarrassment or we can go and fight out on day five,” Dean Elgar told a press conference. It’s great to see how the guys responded around that.

“There are a lot of learnings to be taken out of today. The flip side could have been that we could have been done here by lunch time and that would have not sat very well in the camp. It’s great to see how the guys responded in terms of how we conducted our conversation into some very good practice today.”

Malibongwe Maketa, the interim coach, concurred: “Today, to come out and fight the way we did, was encouraging. We knew we had to bat way above our average to compete.”

South Africa lost six wickets and scored 212 runs on Sunday. Seen objectively that’s hardly cause for the sighs of relief emitted by Elgar and Maketa. But when you’ve been bowled out for fewer than 200 — once for 99 — in seven of your previous eight innings, 255 in the first innings in Sydney and three of your four batters in the second dig spending at least an hour at the crease looks like a skyscraper of achievement, not the modest two-storey block it is. That’s perspective, and the South Africans could be forgiven for theirs being skew currently.

But they’ve brought that on themselves. They’re in this mess because, after beating England by an innings inside three days at Lord’s in August, they took their foot off their opponents’ throat by changing their XI. Thus the South Africans, in one disastrous decision, disrespected what they had done at Lord’s and paid England respect that, based on that performance, they did not deserve. Grateful for the gasp of air they were granted, Ben Stokes’ ambitious, fearless team smacked the visitors upside the head at Old Trafford and at the Oval. Elgar’s team haven’t been the same since, particularly at the crease.

Yet the difference between the teams in runs scored off the bat in England was a marginal 67. In Australia it was 277. Steve Smith, Travis Head, David Warner and Usman Khawaja each made more than 200 runs in the series, and Alex Carey and Marnus Labuschagne passed 100. Temba Bavuma’s 185 was the highest South African aggregate. Kyle Verreynne and Sarel Erwee were their only other players to reach three figures in the rubber. Verreynne and Erwee are also South Africa’s most recent centurions — they made 126 not out and 108 in Christchurch in February last year. Australia banked four hundreds, among them Warner’s 200 at the MCG, in this series alone. 

Conditions have been an important factor in South Africa’s struggles. Of the six Tests they have played from the start of the England series, only in their last two matches in Australia, in Melbourne and Sydney, were the pitches decent for batting. Having been rattled and rolled in the first four of those games — and come out on the right side of the equation only once — South Africa’s batters couldn’t regroup even on a good surface. Too much tentativeness and doubt had crept in by the time they took guard at the MCG.

“From a confidence point of view, naturally the batters would have been hit,” Justin Sammons, the batting consultant, told a press conference on Friday. “In the [MCG] Test, an area we had been improving on as a batting group — the mental errors we were making — we slipped up. We strayed out of our gameplan.”

Then there’s experience. Australia’s XI at the SCG have 568 Test caps between them, South Africa’s 310. South Africa’s top seven have 307 innings, Australia’s almost twice as many: 591. The disparity persists at domestic level, where Australia’s six state sides play a double round of Sheffield Shield matches and a final. In South Africa this season, first-class teams will play only seven matches each — not least because the inaugural edition of the SA20, which starts on Tuesday, has been wedged into what would normally be time to play the longer format.

“There’s no substitute for experience and you can only gain experience by playing,” Sammons said. “The more games you play the better you’re going to get and the more lessons you’re going to take. It’s an important focus area in terms of how we manage to still look after the first-class system. It’s going to be a tricky balancing act now with the way the world is going. But we do need a way to balance it. We need our guys playing as much cricket as possible. That’s the way you get better.”

It’s telling that a bid to increase the number of first-class matches has been launched by the players, in the form of a resolution taken at the South African Cricketers’ Association annual meeting in November, and not by CSA. The underlying reality is that first-class cricket leaks money, which a T20 tournament can make. Essentially, the SA20 will pay the salaries of Elgar, Maketa, Sammons and everyone else who might see their primary focus as Test cricket. So finding methods to live with T20 is essential.

“We’ve got to think out of the box, as a board or the director of cricket, to find ways,” Sammons said. “There have to be ways. We can’t just resign ourselves to the fact and say, ‘That’s it, we’re not going to play enough first-class cricket. T20 is going to dominate.’ We can’t have that mindset. We’ve got to have the mindset of saying we’ve got to find a way. How we go about that is up to the decision-makers. It’s key for us. We have to play more first-class cricket.”

Sammons sees in Verreynne, who played 50 first-class matches in almost seven years before making his Test debut, and who scored two of South Africa’s four half-centuries in Australia, what the country’s system, albeit flawed, is capable of producing: “His growth has been tremendous, from a technical point of view and mentally. His success lies in being able to play at his tempo and his rhythm. He’s also clear in terms of his identity as a cricketer. He understands who he is and how he’s going to go about making runs. That’s a big part of batting. If you see Dean bat, you know what you’re getting. You see the same thing day in, day out. You would say the same about [Jacques] Kallis or Graeme Smith. I think [Verreynne] has that.”

Sammons also had good things to say about Khawaja, who made an undefeated 195 at the SCG: “You can easily go into the mindset of just trying to survive, in comparison to still being positive. That doesn’t mean you need to be reckless. What Khawaja’s done so well is stay in his gameplan. That’s going to be the key for us — to still have that positive mindset and not make it about survival.”

Khawaja’s reckless hack at a Kyle Abbott away swinger in Hobart in November 2016 precipitated a collapse of 8/32 that sealed South Africa’s innings victory, and with it series honours. Khawaja has since rebuilt his game, anchoring it on disciplined aggression, and was rewarded with three centuries, two innings in the 90s and three half-centuries in 2022. He was dismissed for fewer than 50 only four times in his dozen trips to the crease.

Elgar has walked that walk, but in something like reverse. He has made eight of his 13 centuries in 102 innings since the 2016 Hobart Test, but none in his most recent 31 completed innings; an unbeaten 96 against India at the Wanderers in January an honourable exception. Elgar has gone two years without a hundred, which is unacceptable for a player who leads by example more than by other measures of captaincy. It doesn’t help that, in his six innings in Australia, he made some of his trouble himself by being strangled down the legside three times and falling victim to a runout.

“I accept that maybe once, maybe twice but the third time is something that highly irritates me,”Elgar said. “You have a way of getting out and bowlers target that. Ten years into a Test career, it’s foreign territory for me. It’s something to reflect on and you can either say it’s shit luck or not. I’m going to have an open mind around it and have a look. It’s frustrating that I could never get going and when I did get going I managed to run myself out [for 26 at the MCG].”

As a red-ball specialist in a system short on red-ball cricket Elgar will be able to get away from it all for the next few weeks: “I’m taking as much time off as I want; that’s what I need at the moment. I just want to get on a plane, and go home and chill out and have a braai and maybe go to the bush and play some golf.”

Maketa, who is reportedly on a shortlist of candidates CSA have interviewed for the permanent version of his position, spoke with a refreshing frankness: “It’s important for us to be honest with ourselves. We had a tough series in England and we had a tough series here. We want to compete against the big teams but we don’t have the Test caps they have at the moment. We’ve done well against them in the past and now they are better than us. We brought the best team we had [to Australia] and we didn’t compete.

“Conditions were better than what we’ve played in in the last 12 months. I was quite encouraged that we’d be able to get that 350 par score for us to be able to put them under pressure and we weren’t able to do that. 

“The stats say South Africa is the most difficult place to bat when it comes to Test cricket [with batters averaging 29.63, lower than in any other country that has hosted more than one Test]. We’ve found a way. With the younger batters, do we expose them to better wickets to get enough runs to perform at this level or do we say we are the team that’s going to win at home and we make it difficult for visiting teams? That’s the way we need to look at things.

“If we are comfortable to win at home, we can leave it the way it is. We want to be successful all around the world. Because to win the WTC you have to come here and win, you have to go to India and win. We don’t want to be a team that only wins at home.”

A year ago, South Africans wouldn’t have dreamt they would have to have this conversation. The balloon has burst.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.