Unseen, unheard, unknown: South Africa’s secret final

“I’ve always said that if South Africa reach a final they will win it.” – Herschelle Gibbs

Telford Vice / Cape Town

THE four people in a Cape Town barbershop didn’t betray any sign of knowing. Neither did a crew of around 20 roadworkers down the street contemplating a large hole where the pavement might have been. No-one behind the counter at a buzzing café, nor the clientele, further along the drag were any the wiser.

The staff at a gym didn’t know, perhaps because all of the seven televisions in the place were tuned to reruns of the previous night’s matches in the men’s European football championships.

Had you not known better, you would have thought South Africa’s men’s team hadn’t reached the final of a World Cup, the T20 version, for the first time not many hours earlier.

If any of those working out in the gym as Thursday morning turned towards afternoon knew, they didn’t let on. Most of them, anyway. Among the latter was Herschelle Gibbs, who held a series of frenetic conversations that must be what nuclear reactions made flesh would look like.

It was in the midst of these exchanges that Gibbs’ eyes caught those of someone he has known since his playing days. The two men stared silently at each other across the gym floor, and for some strange reason each held up an index finger. The expression on both of their faces was that of someone who had been kissed for the first time.

Gibbs admitted to Cricbuzz that he was “happy, excited and nervous all at the same time; it feels lovely”. He noted that, “I’ve always said that if South Africa reach a final they will win it.” Indeed, Gibbs made that assertion on radio as recently as Wednesday, when he also said he hoped Saturday’s final in Barbados would feature South Africa and India.

He was granted half that wish at 4.37am on Thursday, South Africa time, when Aiden Markram’s team completed a nine-wicket thrashing of Afghanistan in their semifinal in Trinidad. Had Gibbs watched the game? “Nah. When I checked the score Afghanistan were 23/5. There was no point, so I went back to sleep.” 

England and India met in the other semi, in Guyana, later on Thursday. Were India still Gibbs’ favoured opponents? It was agreed that “once the Indians get going they’re difficult to stop”, but also that while England have quality spinners in Adil Rashid, Liam Livingstone and Moeen Ali, “Kensington Oval doesn’t turn”.

While he was talking, a woman old enough to be Gibbs’ mother — he is 50 — approached and interrupted the discussion. “Excuse me,” she said. Gibbs: “Yes madam?” She explained that she was struggling to adjust a nearby piece of weight training equipment. Could he help?

Without another word Gibbs accompanied her to the machine, repositioned a cable that had lost its way, set the weight to her desired level, watched her perform the exercise, and offered her tips on how to do so safely and optimally. Clearly clueless about who he was, she thanked him. He smiled and returned to his conversation companion.

Gibbs duly earned his reputation as a rock star cricketer who was never too far from trouble off the field. But, away from all that, he is steeped in basic human decency. His greatest gift isn’t that he played the game better than most people on the planet, and doubtless would have done in any sport of his choosing. Instead it is that he is the most unfamous famous person you could meet. Greet him once and the next time he sees you he treats you as a friend. When you do see him again and you ask how he is his answer is invariably a booming, “Tremendous!”

His good manners were on display on the night of March 16 2007, the day he hit every ball of Dutch leg spinner Daan van Bunge’s fourth over for six in a World Cup match in St Kitts. Gibbs stood dapperly at the counter of a beach bar, a veritable off-duty James Bond. He bought drinks for others and accepted drinks from others, all the while maintaining impeccable behaviour, until at least 2am. Four hours later he strode purposefully up a fairway on a nearby golf course, five-iron in hand.

Was David Miller’s constitution that strong? Just more than 10 hours after the semifinal ended he beamed out of a screen at an online press conference wearing team travelling gear and looking at least as dapper as Gibbs did all those years ago. It was 8.30am in Trinidad. How much sleep had he had?

“Three or four hours,” Miller said. “It’s early, but that’s pretty standard. We’ve had some weird timings. Fortunately, we steamrolled them and finished the game earlier than expected, which was a good result.”

Complaints over the hectic schedule teams have had to keep to make it to the six Caribbean grounds that hosted 36 of the 52 group and Super Eight games and will stage all three of the knockout matches have been rife.

“We haven’t really spoken about it as such,” Miller said. “There have been murmurs here and there, but if I told you exactly how our travel in the last couple of weeks has gone you would be shocked. So it’s been a monumental effort from the management and players to buy into where we are right now.

“It blows my mind that it felt like the tournament dragged on in the beginning, and then we played the Super Eights pretty much back-to-back on different islands. It doesn’t make sense. I think it could have been structured better. But it is what it is, and what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. We certainly are stronger for it.”

South Africa’s four group games were spread over a dozen days, and the first three were played in Nassau County. Their three Super Eights matches were crammed into five days, and they had to go from Antigua to St Lucia and back to Antigua to play them.

But Miller was correct — South Africa were stronger for the experience. All that time on Nassau’s nasty pitch prepared them well for a similar surface in the semifinal.

Did their sudden status as finalists mean a more relaxed programme leading into Saturday’s decider? The question wasn’t asked, nevermind answered. “Apologies, but we have to check out in seven minutes to catch the bus,” the media manager said as she called a halt to proceedings.

Cricket is a major sport in South Africa, but far from the obsession it is in south Asia. Football is to South Africa what cricket is to India, even though the national football teams don’t often get far on the world stage. The Springboks have kept rugby’s profile high by winning a record four men’s World Cups since claiming their first title in 1995.

Cricket hasn’t helped itself by winning only two of their 11 men’s knockout games at World Cups. But, win or lose and particularly should they win, the game’s place in the public consciousness will be elevated on Saturday. Maybe then people will know.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Hope soars as South Africa reach final frontier for first time

“There’s nothing to be scared of.” – Aiden Markram

Telford Vice / Cape Town

HOPE is the thing with feathers. It gets you out of bed when the alarm ends your night’s sleep at 2am. It explains brushing your teeth at 2.15am. It floods the black pools of your six-month-old kitten’s eyes as he stares at you through the winter darkness: you’re awake! Let’s play!

“Firstly, thanks for waking up that early, jeepers,” Aiden Markram told a press conference on Tuesday when he was asked for his message to the fans ahead of the men’s T20 World Cup semifinal against Afghanistan in Tarouba, which started at 2.30am on Thursday South Africa time.

Markram seemed surprised at the prospect of people harbouring enough hope to watch him and his team play at that hour. When you’ve won seven consecutive games you have soared, feathered or not, past hope. You know you can win because you have won.

But hope is all the fans have. Some of them have been willing you onwards and upwards since that soggy semi against England at the SCG in 1992. Others wouldn’t have been born then. Still others wouldn’t have been alive the last time you were in a semi in this format, more than 10 years ago. Before the sun rose on Thursday all of them, regardless of when they were born, knew this time would be different.

The television cameras settled on a splodge of yellow-shirted spectators in the stands. Australia supporters! By all that made sense, they should have been watching Mitchell Marsh’s men play South Africa in this semi. But Afghanistan have, in the best and most exciting way, made this tournament not make sense. Until this match, of course. 

Their dismissal for 56 — their lowest total in all their 138 T20Is — in 11.5 overs was confirmed, on review, at 3.33am. Azmatullah Omarzai’s 10 was their highest score. Aside, that is, from the 13 extras. Kagiso Rabada bowled Ibrahim Zadran through the gate with his first ball of the match and did the same to Mohammad Nabi with his fourth, a sniping inswinger, which reduced the Afghans to 20/4 and erased their chances of posting a competitive total.

The essence of their nightmare was captured not by a delivery or a stroke, but by Naveen-ul-Haq arriving at the crease in the 10th over wearing neither helmet nor cap. When you’re taking guard at 50/8 who cares what’s on your head?  

A heaving Quinton de Kock lost his off stump to Fazalhaq Farooqi and the 11th delivery of South Africa’s reply, and Reeza Hendricks and Markram sealed victory in 8.5 overs with an unbroken stand of 55 off 43. The target was chalked off by 4.37am. Next stop the uncharted territory, for this team, of a World Cup final. They will meet England or India in Barbados on Saturday.

Much of which will be overshadowed by a Brian Lara Stadium pitch on which even the outrageously fine player for whom the ground is named would have struggled to shine. Some deliveries took off, others refused to launch, all seemed to veer this side or that. There was seam. There was swing. There was turn. Nothing about batting on this surface was fair.

A case in point was the penultimate delivery of South Africa’s last powerplay over, which was bowled by the bearded flying fury on legs called Rashid Khan — whose googly to Hendricks pitched short and stayed resolutely low.

Maybe because he has had a difficult tournament, scoring 80 runs in seven innings before this match, 43 of them in one innings, and never looking fluent, Hendricks was equipped to deal with what he faced in that instant; he jammed his bat onto the ball. It wasn’t anything like as elegant as Hendricks often is, but it was effective. 

Rashid fielded and followed through into Hendricks’ half of the pitch, looking at least as menacing as Dennis Lillee. He aimed a face as thunderous as his eyes were bolts of lightning at the South African, and underarmed the ball onto the stumps even though the batter was well within his ground. The bails and stumps lit up in apologetic sympathy.    

“We might have played better than that but the conditions didn’t allow us to do what we wanted,” Rashid said on television after the match, adding bleakly, “But you have to be prepared for any conditions.”

Between innings, a television interviewer had approached Rabada on the outfield. “Hi KG,” you could lipread her saying, “I’m Laura McGoldrick, Martin Guptill’s wife.” Rabada told her on camera, “We 100% believe that this is the team [to win a World Cup]. Why play if you don’t believe it?”

Rabada was not part of the side beaten by McGoldrick’s husband and 10 other New Zealanders — one of them, Grant Elliott, born and raised a South African — at Eden Park in the 2015 World Cup semi. Those players no doubt also believed they could win. But Rabada was at Eden Gardens in November to endure another World Cup semi defeat, to Australia. He would have believed South Africa could win then, too.

Now they have earned only their second success in 11 knockout games, and their first in a semifinal. Dare they hope for one more win? “There’s nothing to be scared of,” Markram said for the cameras, his eyes unnervingly steady.

“‘Hope’ is the thing with feathers,” Emily Dickinson wrote as the opening line of a poem whose first verse continues, “That perches in the soul. And sings the tune without the words. And never stops at all.”

She was right originally, and on that wet night in Sydney in 1992, in Karachi in 1996, in Birmingham in 1999, in St Lucia in 2007, in Nottingham in 2009, in Dhaka in 2011, in Dhaka again in 2014, in Auckland in 2015, in Kolkata last year. And in Tarouba on Wednesday. Or Thursday, if you were among those who rose at 2am emptied of sleep but filled with hope.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Reality rockers meet the A-team

“You don’t not have confidence if you manage to win games the way that we have.” – Rob Walter

Telford Vice / Cape Town

ONE word. Four syllables. Starts with A. It’s the name of your opponents in the 2024 men’s T20 World Cup semifinals. Had those clues been given to South Africa’s players before the tournament, their answer would in all likelihood have been that other team whose name starts with an A.

You know — those guys who have limped home among the 16 also-rans who tried and failed to reach the knockout rounds. That’s right: Australia. Instead, Afghanistan will be South Africa’s opponents in Trinidad on Thursday. And they will be taken just as seriously as any bunch of Aussies. That’s what beating New Zealand, Australia and Bangladesh in the space of 18 days gets you: respect.

Along the way the Afghans were thumped by West Indies and India, while South Africa have won all seven of their matches. But Afghanistan are surfing the World Cup wave so impressively — and that as a side from a landlocked country, no less — and South Africa’s history in knockout games — played nine, won one — is so skewed that it would not be outlandish to make Rashid Khan’s A-team favourites.

Indeed, in Rahmanullah Gurbaz and Ibrahim Zadran they have two of the top five runscorers in the tournament, while Fazalhaq Farooqi, Rashid and Naveen-ul-Haq are among the leading five wicket-takers. South Africa’s top batter, Quinton de Kock, is sixth on the list and their most successful bowler, Anrich Nortjé, is joint eighth.

The difference between these South Africans and those who have been to the semifinal rodeo before is that they wouldn’t struggle to agree with the assertion that Afghanistan go into the match holding the upper hand. Because Aiden Markram’s charges are also riding a wave. Its one-word name also has four syllables but starts with R. As in reality.

Here’s a flavour, courtesy of Rob Walter when he was asked during a press conference on Monday if he felt sorry for batters considering the conditions they have had to put up with for much of the tournament: “The world of professional sports doesn’t allow for much sympathy, but it does allow for understanding.”

Afghanistan, too, are living in the real world. That was clear from Rashid’s answer to the question of when he thought the victory over Bangladesh in St Vincent in the wee hours of Tuesday morning had been secured: “The only time I believed we had won the game was when we took the last wicket.”

Out there in the really real world, many will hope for a sign or at least an acknowledgement from the Afghans that they represent the women and girls of their country — who are barred by the repressive Taliban regime from so much that is available to men, including playing cricket. Until 1994, South Africa’s teams also flew the flag of a society ruled by unfairness and fear.

The issue then was apartheid. Now it is gender apartheid. Then as now, cricket — and cricketers — cannot be allowed to look the other way.

When: Afghanistan vs South Africa, June 27, 12.30AM (June 28) GMT, 8.30PM Local, 2.30AM (June 28) SAST, 6AM (June 28) IST 

Where: Brian Lara Stadium, Tarouba, Trinidad

What to expect: A cool, clear evening. And low scores. Papua New Guinea were bowled out for 95 — by the Afghans — and 78 at this ground, where West Indies’ 149/9 was enough to beat New Zealand by 13 runs.  

Head to head in T20 World Cups: Afghanistan 0-2 South Africa

Team Watch: 

Afghanistan 

This isn’t a cricket team. It’s a movement, and its time is now.

Tactics & Matchups: In Rashid Khan, closer to a one-man XI than an allrounder and captain, Afghanistan trust.

Probable XI: Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Ibrahim Zadran, Azmatullah Omarzai, Gulbadin Naib, Mohammad Nabi, Karim Janat, Rashid Khan (capt), Nangeyalia Kharoti, Noor Ahmad, Naveen-ul-Haq, Fazalhaq Farooqi

South Africa

So far so shaky, and so unbeaten. They have sailed close to defeat in almost every game, and won them all.

Tactics & Matchups: It’s a seamer’s pitch, but Tabraiz Shamsi could be counted on to bamboozle.

Probable XI: Quinton de Kock, Reeza Hendricks, Aiden Markram (capt), Tristan Stubbs, Heinrich Klaasen, David Miller, Marco Jansen, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Anrich Nortjé, Tabraiz Shamsi

Did you know? 

— Of the 51 wickets taken by bowlers at this ground during the tournament 41 — 80.39% — have fallen to seam bowlers.

— Of the 67 individual innings begun at Tarouba during the tournament only one has reached 50. Gulbadin Naib was 49 not out when Afghanistan clinched victory over Papua New Guinea.

— Thirteen of those 67 innings have resulted in ducks: a quacking 19.40%.

What they said:

“I think we deserve to be in the semis.” — Rashid Khan feels the same way as everyone else who has watched his team in the tournament.

“You don’t not have confidence if you manage to win games the way that we have. And then there’s certain parts of the game that we know we need to brush up and tighten up on. We’re working through that continuum the whole time and being real about the things that we need to do better, being real about where we are in certain aspects of our game, and celebrating the stuff that we’ve been getting right.” — Rob Walter on the new South Africa.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

‘Snowballing’ batting issues cloud SA’s Caribbean sunshine

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in London

THIS time last week South Africa were in good place, and in more than one sense.

Seven days on, that’s no longer the case for Dané van Niekerk and her team.

It’s difficult not to feel good about life when you’re in Barbados, where the sun almost always shines, there’s a beach around every corner, and the locals are as welcoming as the cocktails are expensive.

And, when you’re up in a one-day series with a game to play, you feel better yet.

That’s the case even when Bridgetown has one of its rare sunless days, which happened last Wednesday when the second of three ODIs was washed out after South Africa had slipped to 177/8 in their 38 overs.

Van Niekerk scored 53 but Chloe Tryon’s 37 was the only other effort of more than 25.

Lacklustre batting was again the issue in the third game, also at Kensington Oval, on Saturday.

Despite Marizanne Kapp’s 4/52 the Windies racked up 292/2 with opener Hayley Matthews hammering 117, her maiden ODI century.

Nothing like it was seen in the South Africans’ reply, which spluttered to an end in the 43rd over with only 177 on the board.

Laura Wolvaardt made 54 and Van Niekerk 77, and they shared 108 for the third wicket. Thing is, no-one else reached double figures and only three other partnerships did.

Rather a drawn series than a defeat, Van Niekerk was told kindly, and rightly dismissed that kind of thinking.

“Hmm, that’s interesting … I don’t know,” Van Niekerk said, and followed that with a Freudian slip that belied her disappointment: “It’s not nice to lose an ODI series like this, especially by such a massive margin.”

She added that “the extras column was horrible”. And it was — 35 of the damned things, 31 of them wides.   

The teams met again on Monday in the first of five T20s, when South Africa could come up with only 107/7 after restricting the home side to 124/6.

Kapp’s 22-ball 30 stood out in a scorecard in which Tryon’s 23 was the only other relative highlight.

Coach Hilton Moreeng conceded that South Africa’s batting problems had become chronic: “It’s snowballed and it’s something we need to rectify very quickly.”

Monday’s issues, as listed by Moreeng, have affected too many of South Africa’s performances in Barbados.

“We thought it was a total we should have been able to chase down,” he said.

“We didn’t have enough partnerships to be able to set up a total.

“Our application was not up to par.”

There were mitigating factors on Monday in the shape of South Africa picking four debutants — batters Robyn Searle and Faye Tunnicliffe, fast bowler Tumi Sekhukhune and off-spinner Saarah Smith, and all of them just 19 except 21-year-old Searle — and leaving out the dependable Van Niekerk and Suné Luus because of what Moreeng called “niggles”.

“The youngsters, especially in the first half, went very well,” Moreeng said. “The way they bowled and fielded, you could see the energy was there.

“In the second half things didn’t go according to plan. As a youngster you can learn from that.”

The series moves to Trinidad on Saturday, when the second game will be played at the Brian Lara Stadium in Tarouba, 52 kilometres from Port-of-Spain.

“A change of scenery is never a bad thing,” Moreeng said.

Indeed. And it probably doesn’t hurt that Trinidad isn’t quite as touristy as Barbados — all the better an environment in which to work on what’s wrong with your game.