Rassie van der Dussen, meet Bishan Singh Bedi

“The situations we faced in the past four years – COVID, Black Lives Matter, SJN – various political stories that we’ve had to manage as a team, have really forced us to pull together.” – Rassie van der Dussen

Telford Vice / Pune

RASSIE van der Dussen, meet Bishan Singh Bedi. You will have so much to talk about that your conversation will soar through and beyond mere cricket. You won’t agree on everything — that would be boring, anyway — but by the time you say goodbye you will have made not only a friend but a comrade.

Sadly, as of last Monday, when Bedi died in Delhi, this connection is no longer possible. That they never met is indeed a pity, because Bedi was that rare creature in cricket, regardless of the era: a player who thought about and spoke about matters far away from the game. His boundary wasn’t the edge of the ground. It was the full extent of what it meant to live, with integrity, in this imperfect world. Van der Dussen is of the same mind.

Which is not to conflate them as cricketers. Bedi’s bowling action was fluid simplicity in motion, the game’s equivalent of Picasso’s lifelong yearning to paint like a child. Van der Dussen’s batting technique can look as if it’s been cobbled together by a committee for the preservation of ungainliness. And yet, just as the product of Bedi’s apparently beach cricket action was the undoing of the world’s top batters, so Van der Dussen’s spiky angularity reaps runs and adds rectitude to South Africa’s batting.

He is their compass at the crease, just as a lodestone guides him off the field. As with Bedi, Van der Dussen’s boundary encircles everything. His answer, at a press conference in Pune on Tuesday when he was asked what had changed for South Africa’s team — who have won five of their first six games at this World Cup — since the 2019 edition, when they lost five of their eight completed matches, said as much.

“I think the situations we faced in the past four years, whether it be COVID, whether it be Black Lives Matter, SJN [CSA’s Social Justice and Nation-Building project, which exposed deep rooted racism in the game], various political stories that we’ve had to manage as a team, have really forced us to pull together.

“And the effect of us being really tight off the field, knowing each other intimately. We’ve been playing together for a very long time. Between any two members of the squad there’s a real connection somewhere. So I think there’s definitely something different in this team. We’ve had to deal with quite a lot of controversy and that’s stood us in good stead.”

A lot of that would seem to have nothing to do with scoring runs and taking wickets. But, because cricket is part of the real world and not the other way round, those who need to score runs and take wickets will be thrown this way and that by the impact of events beyond the edge of the ground. 

Van der Dussen, like Bedi, is not among the unfortunates who believe in the impossibility that sport should be sacrosanct and separate from everything around it. The reaction to South Africa’s loss to the Netherlands on October 17, which leapt far past Dharamsala’s confines, proved that. 

“You realise there are people at home who’ve been scarred by South Africa’s performances at World Cups,” Van der Dussen said. “And you can’t criticise them for feeling that way — it’s criticism coming from a place of hurt; they’ve seen that movie before. But we haven’t lived that, so it’s not really applicable to us and it’s not affecting us. It’s part of history but it’s certainly not part of us as a team.”

That history is starkly different to the Springboks’, who have returned home to the adulation of their compatriots after winning the rugby World Cup for a record fourth time. The Boks have yet to lose a final. The Proteas have yet to reach a final. That’s a bleak view from the cricket end of the equation, but Van der Dussen said the team were “massively” inspired by their rugby counterparts.

“I think Siya [Kolisi, the Springbok captain] mentioned in a press conference that if you’re not from South Africa you don’t really understand what sporting achievements mean for the people at home and for us. The realisation for us is that we’re no different. Yes, we haven’t won World Cups. But if we do manage to get there it will be an honour for us to be mentioned in the same sentence as those guys.”

What did it mean for Van der Dussen to represent not a country where realities are less contested, or problems are on a smaller scale, or the future seems stable? What did it mean to play, instead, for South Africa’s teams? 

“We come from a very divided background, and that sort of mindset is still entrenched in a lot of communities and among a lot of the older generation. What the Springboks and what sport shows us is that, as South Africans, when you do get things right and you do things the right way, what you can achieve. Good things happen to good people. That Springbok team, that’s what they are. They’re all hardworking, good South Africans with a real humility about them, a real hunger for success. It shows, when you’re willing to put differences aside, what’s possible for a country like ours.”

At 34, Van der Dussen lives in a South Africa he knows is at once different and similar to what it was under apartheid. Gerald Coetzee, 11 years Van der Dussen’s junior, is from a different time and, in some senses, a different place. “We’ve grown up to understand each other’s cultures, and when we don’t understand something we try to respect it,” Coetzee said. “Because when you don’t understand something you still need to respect it.”

Coetzee “can’t imagine how hard it must have been” to live and play sport under apartheid, “but our cricket heritage is old and we look up to those players. So as much as the politics was horrible, the players were decent. There’s a balance — looking at the cricketers we’ve produced over the years and being proud of that; also looking at the history and being sad. But also rejoicing about that it’s become so much better and there’s been so much growth. We need to look at that and appreciate it.”

Had Bedi, a cricketer’s cricketer who was so much more than a cricketer, still been with us it would be difficult not to imagine him nodding and smiling in approval. This, he might have said, is how life is supposed to work: one generation making it better for the next.

Before India visited South Africa for the first time from November 1992 to January 1993 — when apartheid was dying but still the law of the land — Bedi, then 47 and long retired, asked Vijay Lokapally, a stalwart Indian journalist who was to cover that tour, “to get literature on South Africa the country and on South African cricket”, Lokapally said. “Bedi sir felt strongly for the blacks. He particularly wanted books that had information on the apartheid days.” When Lokapally returned home Bedi invited him to lunch and a debrief: “He listened to my experiences with childlike enthusiasm. He wanted to know if I had experienced any discrimination because of my colour.”

Famously, Bedi wrote to the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) to demand his name be removed from a stand at the Kotla after the ground was relabelled in honour of Arun Jaitley, a former DDCA president and BCCI vice-president but more prominent as India’s minister of finance. To be connected with a figure he detested was too much for Bedi, whose letter scathed: “With honour comes responsibility. They fêted me for the total respect and integrity with which I played the game. And now I’m returning the honour to assure them all that four decades after my retirement, I still retain those values.” As if that wasn’t clear enough, he followed up with another volley days later: “I don’t wish a stand in my name when late Arun Jaitley’s statue is erected without any visible shame.”

Even so, the Bishan Singh Bedi Stand still hugs the western boundary in Delhi, offering spectators respite from the setting sun. Cheers rose from those in its seats on October 7 — 16 days before Bedi’s death — when South Africa piled up 428/5 to beat Sri Lanka by 102 runs. Quinton de Kock and Aiden scored centuries, but so did a player who isn’t blessed with their languid left-handedness, a man of angles, integrity, and the courage to speak his mind. Maybe, in cricket’s strange way, Van der Dussen did meet Bedi after all. 

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa launch with runs and records

“You get out there and the wicket starts playing really well. It’s initially a big sigh of relief, and secondly your instinct takes over and it becomes a see-ball, hit-ball mentality. Marrying the two is crucial.” – Aiden Markram

Telford Vice / The Kotla

BISHAN Singh Bedi has given cricket so much, and still his gifts keep coming. On Saturday the stand that bears his name and curves along the western boundary at the ground formerly known as the Kotla bequeathed a generous pool of shade that spread and deepened as the sun sank behind it.

The spectators gathered there would have been relieved to escape the sharp end of the 38-degree heat. But they still had to breathe air rated, forebodingly, as “very unhealthy”. It stained the sky the colour of a bedraggled dish towel, which had holes ripped into it by Delhi’s famous swooping and swirling black kites.  

Not that Sri Lanka had time or opportunity for bird-watching, even though they spent much of the afternoon looking upward. They did so in search of the ball that South Africa’s batters had sent booming boundaryward. The Lankans couldn’t hide from the heat, and their increasingly heaving gasps as they chased leather meant they took in more of the dirty air than anyone else.

Except, perhaps, for Quinton de Kock, Rassie van der Dussen and Aiden Markram, who spent an accumulated 405 minutes — verging on seven hours — batting in the soupy stickiness. They scored 100, 108 and 106 to propel South Africa to 428/5, the highest total in all 440 games played in men’s World Cup history.

How long did Markram think that would be the benchmark? “The way batters are playing nowadays you wouldn’t be surprised if that record is broken in this competition,” he said, a startling admission for someone whose ton had come off 49 balls.

That made it the fastest of all the 201 centuries in the tournament’s annals, while the 204 De Kock and Van der Dussen shared off 174 is South Africa’s biggest stand for any wicket in their 81 ODIs against the Lankans.

How much of the way the South Africans batted was plotted and how much is what happens when a team’s innings grows wings bigger and stronger than a black kite’s?

“You do a lot of planning before the game,” Markram said. “It’s natural for teams to speculate about conditions, especially for South Africans coming over to India. You’re not always 100% sure how it’s going to play.

“Then you get out there and the wicket starts playing really well. It’s initially a big sigh of relief, and secondly your instinct takes over and it becomes a see-ball, hit-ball mentality. Marrying the two of them is crucial.”

Markram, one of the more demure players in the game, let loose a mighty yawp when he reached his century. De Kock and Van der Dussen, too, didn’t try to stave off animated celebrations. They inspired images of three bottles of freshly uncorked champagne.

“It’s quite strange; you almost get this thing that takes over your body at certain moments,” Markram said. “There’s a lot of passion in this team to give our absolute all at this World Cup and see how far it can get us.

“We’ve been known to start slowly so we put a lot of emphasis on today’s game, to start well and play the same cricket we’ve been playing to manage to sneak into this competition. All of those emotions mixed up and building up comes out.”

South Africa have won six of their eight opening matches at a World Cup. But the two they lost became attached to memories they would prefer not to have: at home in 2003, when they crashed out of the tournament in the pool stage, and in England in 2019, when they slumped to their worst performance in the event by losing five of their completed eight matches. So Saturday’s success meant more, to the players, than just one win.    

Similarly, with South Africa building a wall of runs and records it wasn’t a day for picking out particular strokes. But De Kock’s sweetly timed off-side dab in the 31st to a wide delivery from Matheesha Pathirana, sending it scooting away for four, stood out. As did David Miller hoisting Kasun Rajitha into the stratosphere for a straight six to end the 49th, which had Tabraiz Shamsi in the dugout covering his mouth with his hand in empathy.

And to think so brutal an onslaught had begun placidly, with De Kock and Van der Dussen needing until midway through the 18th to bring up the hundred. The Lankans put some back into their new-ball effort and occasional deliveries skidded on, which was how Temba Bavuma was trapped in front by Dilshan Madushanka in the third.     

But the effects of the sun, the air, the flattening pitch and the small, fast outfield mounted on Sri Lanka, and the South Africans escaped the leash in the 23rd. With De Kock hitting Dhananjaya de Silva for four through the covers and six over long-on, the over went for a dozen runs and took South Africa’s runrate for the innings into double figures. They never looked back. Even Bedi might have struggled to reel them in. That Sri Lanka fielded judiciously told its own story. How many more runs would they have haemorrhaged had they been sloppy?   

The crowd of 15,496 would have swelled the stands and grass banks in most of South Africa’s major grounds. In Delhi they amounted to little more than a third of capacity. During the interval they probably thought they had seen their money’s worth, and more so when Marco Jansen’s first delivery, an inswinger, nailed a flummoxed Pathum Nissanka’s middle stump. Happily, the fans would have been mistaken.

Kusal Mendis tore into his task with gusto that suggested he thought the target — more than Sri Lanka had successfully chased in the 440 ODIs in which they had batted second — was attainable. He made 51 of their first 54 runs, and took his team to 94/2 after 10. At the same stage South Africa had been 48/1.

But Hurricane Mendis always looked like blowing itself out. It was a question of when, which was answered in the 13th — he edged a widish, sharply bouncing delivery from Kagiso Rabada to Klaasen, who kept wicket in the absence of the cramping De Kock.

That was the first of three wickets that fell for 41 in 45 balls. With them went any chance the Lankans might have had of answering their massive ask in the affirmative. Charith Asalanka and Dasun Shanaka scored half-centuries — the latter’s was his first in 20 completed white-ball innings — and they shared 82 off 72. But it was all for show, not dough.

Maybe the South Africans knew that. It would explain their messy display in the field, and the three dropped catches and another chance that didn’t go to hand. The plan seemed to be to bowl straight, but that left minimal margin for error given the willing pitch and the confines of the ground.

When you’ve piled up 428, slipping discipline is unlikely to come back to bite you where it hurts. It didn’t: Sri Lanka were dismissed for 326 in 44.5. But that won’t wash against more competitive opponents — like Australia, who South Africa face in Lucknow on Thursday. Before then they should rope in Bishan Singh Bedi to conduct a masterclass. 

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.