From Tendulkar to Kohli, and South Africa’s ‘good’ news

South Africa suffered their heaviest defeat in all their 667 ODIs.

Telford Vice / Eden Gardens

WHILE all of India, it seemed, obsessed about Virat Kohli equalling Sachin Tendulkar’s world record of 49 ODI centuries at Eden Gardens on Sunday, South Africa fixed their focus on winning. Or at least staying competitive well enough to emerge with their dream of a first ever title not having curdled into another tournament nightmare.

Like every other side who have faced the Indians at this World Cup, Temba Bavuma’s team did not achieve their primary goal. But the second mattered more, as too often at past events they have played unrecognisably, infuriatingly poor cricket compared to their performances from just days before.

Their place in the semifinals this time is assured, like India’s. But South Africa’s chances of advancing to the final would be severely impaired should they be blown away by the strongest side at the World Cup in a manner that raised the ghosts of their previous exits.

Essentially, they needed to give India a run for their money. As Rahul Dravid said on Saturday, “If we keep executing our skills and somebody outplays us and beats us, then good luck. We shake their hand and walk away.” So, can the South Africans say they went down to demonstrably the better outfit on the day/night, and that they gave as much as they had and were hammered regardless? Or that they let themselves and their supporters down in an all too familiar fashion? The simplistic answer would be yes, but that doesn’t get us far in analysing what happened.

Being beaten by 243 runs — South Africa’s heaviest defeat in all their 667 ODIs — is never a good thing. Suffering that fate because you were bowled out for 83 — their joint second-lowest total — in 27.1 overs is even worse. Neither is it edifying to haemorrhage 91 runs in the powerplay. Nor to concede 326/5, India’s second-biggest total of the tournament. Only four times in their 1,049 ODIs have India inflicted a bigger hiding. 

This was domination. And that, counterintuitively, is good news for the South Africans. They did not beat themselves. They were outplayed. After so many years of wondering how they could give such an unworthy account of themselves, particularly when they were under pressure, this represents progress.

Or does it? With both sides knowing they were already in the semis, there was minimal pressure in terms of the bigger picture. At least not on South Africa. What has become India’s travelling roadshow of a World Cup means they are duty-bound to play a high-octane brand of cricket at all nine grounds they will visit. And, when it’s working as well as it has, the pressure on the home is purely positive.    

Perhaps that philosophy prompted Rohit Sharma to bat first, which could be read as a gamble — his team had won five of their seven matches chasing. But South Africa had been victorious five times out of seven when they had taken guard first. It shows India’s confidence that, in the interests of negating their opponents’ proven prowess, they were willing to change tactics and move away from their own strength. You can do that when you have a team who have no apparent weaknesses.

That could also be said of the South Africans, but to an exponentially lesser degree. Playing against them is taking on an excellent team of mortals. Coming up against India is tantamount to trying to retain the right to be on the same field as demigods of the modern game. As hyperbolic as that sounds, the Indians are backing up that statement with their performances.

When these teams met at the 2011 World Cup, in Nagpur, Tendulkar himself scored a century for the ages but South Africa won. On Sunday, Kohli’s unbeaten 101 was — by his standards — scratchy and at times unconvincing; his strike rate of 83.47 is his lowest when he has made a hundred, and that can’t all be ascribed to a pitch that turned sharply. But Kohli and his fellow superhumans in India’s team know who and what they are.

So do the Eden Gardens crowd. The only other time India have played a World Cup match at this ground, the 1996 semifinal against Sri Lanka, the game was awarded to the Lankans “by default”, the scorers recorded, after spectators rained missiles onto the field — mostly plastic bottles — to protest India’s shaky display. Play was abandoned immediately a glass bottle was thrown onto an area of the outfield where Kumar Dharmasena was stationed.

This time there no such regrettable aggression, and nothing to spark it. Even the lift that services the members’ club has been committed to non-violence: its muzak is the puerile non-jazz inflicted on the world by the talentless Kenny G.

The real music was played on the field. As they have done everywhere they have played, the Indians wooed and wowed their fans. And impressed the sprinkling of South African supporters in the stands into the bargain. Dharmasena, too, would have had his World Cup memory of the ground updated — he was one of the standing umpires on Sunday.

If you weren’t South African you went home giddily happy. If you were South African you went home dazed and confused at how the second-best team in the tournament, as per the standings, not opinion, could have been left in the dust so convincingly. All went home with the precious memory of the day/night Kohli caught up to Tendulkar.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

In the Eden Gardens of hopes and dreams

“We are trying to not even think about who we are playing. It’s all about us.” – Rahul Dravid makes no bones about India’s self-centredness.

Telford Vice / Eden Gardens

THE South Africans wouldn’t have seen the dozens of India replica shirt sellers on the paths leading to Eden Gardens on Saturday, a pile of azure and saffron hopes and dreams in front of each of them. They wouldn’t have taken note of the scrums of hopefuls at the ticket counters, nor felt the urgency and intensity that shimmered from them.

They would have had no clue about the scores of workers ranged around this grand but strangely bleak ground, waiting in the shade to do whatever it is they had been employed to do. But, after their training session, they would have heard the rising wave of cheers that greeted their bus as it pulled away and melted into the fast falling evening. And they would have known: they are not in Kansas anymore. Or anywhere India aren’t.

The men’s World Cup, for India and South Africa, starts on Sunday. These sides have spent the tournament like the big beasts they are, circling each other and putting other, lesser sides in their place. They are at the top of the standings, and on Sunday — not before time — they will be on the same ground not giving each other anywhere to run or hide.

It was probably a good thing the South Africans were long gone by the time the Indians arrived for their practice under lights. So they didn’t hear or feel the roar that greeted the sight of the home team’s bus, which was exponentially more powerful than that with which the visitors had been sent on their way.

Also advantageous, no doubt, was that they had no knowledge of the police, some on horseback, others armed with lathis, using what looked like unnecessary violence to disperse a throng that had formed several metres away from the bus to try and catch a glimpse of the men who not only wear the authentic version of those azure and saffron shirts, but also embody so many of the nation’s hopes and dreams. And also, perhaps, to wish Virat Kohli a happy 35th birthday for Sunday. 

South Africa’s session ambled through its few hours in front of empty banks of seats. Shaun Pollock was in attendance and had apparently casual chats with a range of his compatriots. Rob Walter took a photograph of the pitch being prepared for Sunday’s game, presumably to make a comparison with the finished article on Sunday.

Before he trained Temba Bavuma gave a press conference, which was well-attended but not packed. Crassly and inexplicably he was asked about choking. The captain of a team who have won six of their seven matches at the tournament, a side who had hung tough to win, by one wicket, the only game in which they had been put under pressure, took it well and answered, not for the first time, with good grace: “To choke? I don’t know how to answer that. I think if we come unstuck tomorrow, I don’t think it’ll be a matter of choking. I doubt you would say about India, if they come unstuck, that they had choked.”

Rahul Dravid appeared in the same room and sat down in the same chair some hours later. This time it was standing room only, and the ICC media manager had to thicken his voice to clear the aisle of a renegade camera person. Dravid was addressed as Sir and Bhai. The crowd nodded their agreement at everything he said and laughed at his dad jokes as if they were in the presence not of cricketing greatness, but someone they would pay good money to see and hear.

On the field outside India’s session was stirring towards starting. In the stands more than a hundred were watching. Up to four large national flags were being waved, and Sudhir Gautam, once Sachin Tendulkar’s No. 1, now the entire team’s, was in attendance; all got up in body paint and blowing his conch.

The shell’s wail rose into the murky darkness like that of a fog horn. It was the sound of hopes and dreams.

When: November 5, 2023 at 14:00 IST

Where: Eden Gardens, Kolkata

What to expect: Heat — 32 degrees — humidity — 65%, and, the form book says, small totals. In the only two games played here in the tournament so far, the first innings totals were 229 and 204. But the teams who scored them were the Netherlands and Bangladesh. Sunday’s reality couldn’t be more different.

Teams:

India

On a surface where South Africa skipper Temba Bavuma thought they could do with an extra spinner, India could also be tempted to use the R Ashwin option. However, if recent tendency is anything to go by they will stick to the combination that has served them well in the last couple of games, even if it means fielding the same five bowlers for another consecutive game.

Tactics & strategy

Where do you start with a team who seem impregnable in all departments? When India reeled off five wins batting second, it seemed they were a bigger threat when they chased. But that was because they hadn’t batted first in the tournament. When they did they won by 100 and 302 runs.

Probable XI: Shubman Gill, Rohit Sharma (capt), Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, KL Rahul, Suryakumar Yadav, Ravindra Jadeja, Mohammed Shami, Kuldeep Yadav, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammad Siraj  

South Africa

Will South Africa deploy Tabraiz Shamsi as well as Keshav Maharaj, or was Bavuma indulging in some mind games when he told his press conference on Saturday that “if the wicket assists the spinners you’ll definitely see those two”? He then said he had yet to see the pitch. One reading of the statistical tea leaves would support a second spinner’s inclusion, another not.    

Tactics & strategy

Conversely to India, the South Africans have looked stronger when they have set targets. They have won five times batting first and lost once batting second. They have won a game chasing — by a solitary wicket when the target was a manageable 271.

Probable XI: Temba Bavuma (capt), Quinton de Kock, Rassie van der Dussen, Aiden Markram, Heinrich Klaasen, David Miller, Marco Jansen, Kagiso Rabada, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Tabraiz Shamsi

Did you know?

— Virat Kohli has scored two of his 48 ODI centuries in the month of November, but he has never batted for India in the format on his birthday. 

— Tabraiz Shamsi’s bowling average in six ODIs against India is 63.60, but 26.71 in three games in India. 

— Pace has claimed 21 wickets at 19.33 and an economy rate of 4.30 at Eden Gardens during the tournament, and spin 10 wickets at 36.30 and 4.81.

What they said:

“We are trying to not even think about who we are playing. It’s all about us. It’s about our preparation, our planning, and whether we can execute our skills.” — Rahul Dravid keeps the focus on India.

“Playing at Eden Gardens is an occasion, but it does become another game of cricket.” – Temba Bavuma plays down the massive moment.

Squads: 

India: Rohit Sharma (captain), Shubman Gill, Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, KL Rahul, Ravindra Jadeja, Shardul Thakur, Jasprit Bumrah, Prasidh Krishna, Mohammed Siraj, Kuldeep Yadav, Mohammed Shami, Ravichandran Ashwin, Ishan Kishan, Suryakumar Yadav

South Africa: Temba Bavuma (capt), Reeza Hendricks, Aiden Markram, David Miller, Rassie van der Dussen, Marco Jansen, Andile Phehlukwayo, Quinton de Kock, Heinrich Klaasen, Gerald Coetzee, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Kagiso Rabada, Tabraiz Shamsi, Lizaad Williams

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Wanderers Test in De Kock’s shadow, Kohli’s decline 

“We still have a Test series to level and hopefully win in Cape Town.” – Dean Elgar on the prospect of doing so without Quinton de Kock.

Telford Vice | Johannesburg

IT seems South African cricket isn’t alone in its unfortunate tendency to shoot itself in both feet when it can least afford it. India, too, are in need of a pair of bulletproof boots.

Going into the second Test at the Wanderers on Monday, in the wake of India’s 113-run win in Centurion, South Africa are still reeling at the shock Test retirement of Quinton de Kock. But the visitors haven’t been able to enjoy the moment and look forward to how they might repeat that feat to claim their first series in the format in this country. Instead, they are tangled in an ever more diabolical web of hints and allegations over who said what to whom and when about Virat Kohli’s diminishing status.

What we do know is that Kohli said in September he would relinquish the T20I part of his then three-pronged captaincy. Last month he was sacked as ODI skipper, and not even the hamstring injury that has ruled Rohit Sharma — his successor — out of the series against the South Africans that starts on January 19 has granted Kohli a reprieve. Instead, KL Rahul will take charge. In a few short months, Kohli has gone from being the undisputed and apparently inviolable über boss of Indian cricket to hanging onto his job as captain in Tests — a format in which he has gone 25 innings without scoring a century.

So India’s victory in the first match of the series was a timely reminder to the BCCI about exactly who they are dealing with in Kohli. It is to be hoped that communication between the suits and the captain improves, because he deserves better than the way he is being treated currently.

De Kock’s decision, which he intimated to senior figures in the team before announcing it after India won on Thursday, came as a body blow to a side that was already out on their feet. Kyle Verreynne should make a worthy replacement, but De Kock walking away — even if it is only in one format — will be seen as another sorry episode in the ominous trend of South Africa’s best and brightest bowing out too early.

Both teams, then, will come to the Wanderers with other issues on their minds. That’s no way to approach a match at South Africa’s least forgiving ground. The often seaming pitch invariably asks searching questions of those who dare bat on it, and the small, fast outfield means bowlers who get it even slightly wrong are punished severely.

We have been reminded umpteen times that India have not lost any of their five Tests at this ground. We also know that South Africa’s won/lost ratio at the Wanderers is better than at any other home venue, bar one — Centurion, where they crashed and burned mere days ago. So, unusually, India will start as favourites.

South Africa will need to improve both their batting and their bowling significantly to stay alive in the series. India will want to keep on carrying on like they did in the first Test. The latter is far more easily done.

The visitors have proved themselves superior to their opponents in all departments, and in those opponents’ backyard no less. That advantage won’t have waned since Thursday. If anything, it will have been enhanced by the introspection both sides no doubt have done.

Monday’s match will start with over-arching feelings of closure. South Africa know they are not the team they used to be — particularly at home. India can’t avoid the approaching end of the dazzlingly successful era of captain Kohli. Whether either or both of those sentiments will be confirmed as valid when the game ends is the best reason there could be to pay close attention.

When: Monday, 10:00 Local Time

Where: The Wanderers, Johannesburg 

What to expect: Nothing like the pitch India were presented with in January 2018, the last time they played a Test at this most South African of grounds — when play was suspended temporarily because the surface was deemed dangerous. The ICC rated the pitch as poor and the groundskeeper lost his job. The ground was slapped with three demerit points that will be in force until January 2023. Pertinently, another two points and the Wanderers’ international status would be suspended. But that doesn’t mean runs will come easily in what will always be among this country’s most challenging batting conditions.     

Team news

South Africa: Quinton de Kock’s shock retirement will be Kyle Verreynne’s gain. Marco Jansen showed off some impressive batting smarts in Centurion, which could see him pushed up the order at the expense of Wiaan Mulder — which would make room for Duanne Olivier.    

Possible XI: Dean Elgar, Aiden Markram, Keegan Petersen, Rassie van der Dussen, Temba Bavuma, Kyle Verreynne, Marco Jansen, Kagiso Rabada, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Duanne Olivier

India: Why would you make changes to an XI that performed so well in conditions not dissimilar to those they will encounter in this match? If the pitch looks ridiculously green, Ishant Sharma could come in for Ravichandran Ashwin. But that’s a long shot.

Possible XI: KL Rahul, Mayank Agarwal, Cheteshwar Pujara, Virat Kohli (capt), Ajinkya Rahane, Rishabh Pant, Ravichandran Ashwin, Shardul Thakur, Mohammed Shami, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj

What they said:

“There’s a responsibility for us to carry and conduct ourselves like international players. We still have to be extremely professional; we still have a Test series to level and hopefully win in Cape Town.” – Dean Elgar wants his players’ minds on the game and not on Quinton de Kock’s retirement 

“I think that he’s in a really good space. I really feel there’s going to be a big run of really good scores coming in from someone like him; just observing him around the group, how relaxed he’s been, how he’s preparing and how switched on he is. I would really hope it happens in the next game. But I do feel, with someone like him, we’re going to see a really big run of scores once it clicks into place. Because he’s really led the way and I couldn’t speak more highly of him. I think he’s been a real credit to himself and to Indian cricket, in spite of all the noise that’s been there around him these last two weeks.” – Rahul Dravid on Virat Kohli’s headspace amid his bleak run of form and the BCCI controversy

  • With inputs from Kaushik Rangarajan

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Players, not suits, write code of conduct

“It works in other walks of life. In some countries you can get demerit points for [poor] driving.” – Shaun Pollock on ICC code of conduct

Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

DAMN fool suits. What do they know about the cut and thrust of cricketers’ battles? How much do they understand about the intensity of being out there when everything is on the line and the world is watching?

Why don’t they stick to shuffling paper on their desks and let people who know what they’re doing come up with important things like the code of conduct? People like the players.

Where’ve you heard that before? Everywhere, and more loudly and frequently since the Australians arrived.

Here’s something you might not have heard — the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) code of conduct is written in, large part, by players.

At least, by those who sit on the ICC’s cricket committee. Currently among them are Anil Kumble, Andrew Strauss, Mahela Jayawardene, Rahul Dravid, Tim May, Darren Lehmann, and Shaun Pollock, the newest member.

“There are some really good discussions,” Pollock said. “There are people of different ages from different eras who have played the game. It’s a good think pot.

“Everyone there, I would say, has the best interests of cricket at heart and want things to run smoothly.

“You want to protect the game, don’t you. And there are things you want to control. You don’t want any ugly incidents happening on the field. You want to put steps in place to try and prevent that.

“So there’s a lot of discussion that goes on about what should and shouldn’t be allowed, how they can prevent what shouldn’t be allowed, and who needs to have the authority.”

Things, of course, don’t run smoothly. They haven’t during Australia’s tour nor in a T20 between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in Colombo last Friday, when players almost came to blows, Shakib Al Hasan ordered his batsmen off the field in protest at an umpire’s decision, and a dressingroom door was smashed.

And for all that two players were each docked 25% of their match fees and slapped, lightly, with a demerit point.

Considering Kagiso Rabada was banned, then unbanned, and that he and David Warner are a point away from a suspension in the wake of their conduct in the South Africa-Australia series, the match officials’ reaction to what happened in Colombo looks like system failure.

Seeming inconsistencies in application aside, Pollock had faith in the demerit approach: “It works in other walks of life. In some countries you can get demerit points for [poor] driving.

“What it tries to show is that if there’s consistent and accumulated bad behaviour you’re going to gather points and eventually you suffer the consequences.

“I suppose the issue that will be discussed again is that minor misdemeanours add up to a major issue and you maybe miss two games.

“They might discuss the point that it has to be something serious enough for you to miss a game, or maybe the financial implications will be bigger for minor infractions and that it must be a serious case of misconduct for you to miss a game.”

The demerit system has been in force since September 2016, and was devised, an ICC spokesperson said, because “there had been feedback from some countries that the existing system of fines and reprimands was proving ineffective, as the fines were having little impact on player attitudes or behaviour and there wasn’t an adequate deterrent for players who repeatedly breached the code of conduct.

“The cricket committee agreed, and recommended the system of demerit points to the chief executives’ committee.”

As long as the suits keep listening to the players and accepting their recommendations, we should be alright.