Group A crackles with context

“There are no guarantees of any success going forward. This game doesn’t work like that.” — Pierre de Bruyn, Namibia coach

Telford Vice / Geelong, Victoria

TOURNAMENTS conjure context out of next to nothing. So after a mere day in Group A we know that Namibia are not messing around, that the Netherlands are capable of engineering gritty victories, that the Sri Lankans are soft in the middle, and that the United Arab Emirates haven’t made much progress towards becoming competitive in global tournaments.

Namibia’s shock 55-run win over the Lankans in the first match of Sunday’s doubleheader in Geelong, followed by the Dutch scraping home by three wickets with a ball to spare despite the UAE’s limp total of 111/8, gave us something to go on for Tuesday’s matches at the same venue.

Sunday’s winners will play the losers. Another win for the Namibians would be a great leap forward to a place in the Super 12, and a second loss for the UAE would be a step towards an early flight home.

But matters are unlikely to be so simple. As disappointing as the Lankans were on Sunday, when their bowlers took their foot the Namibians’ throats, allowing them to recover from 93/6 to 163/7, they should have the beating of a UAE side who have won only one of the 15 ODI and T20 World Cups matches they have played. The Dutch, who would have come unstuck on Sunday if they were chasing even a marginally more decent target, will have to raise their game exponentially if they are to stay in the contest with Namibia. The most likely outcome is victory for Sri Lanka and the Namibians, which would make the Africans the only side with two wins and leave just the Emiratis with two defeats.

The uncertainty is only deepened by the fact that the pitch prepared for Tuesday’s matches, which is adjacent to Sunday’s surface, has significantly less grass. All four teams struggled with the lack of pace on Sunday — three batters succumbed to catches off the leading edge in the Namibia-Sri Lanka game alone — and they could find themselves on an even slower slab on Tuesday. More grist for the context mill.      

When: Tuesday, 3pm and 7pm Local Time

Where: Kardinia Park, Geelong

What to expect: A cool, sunny, dry day and evening. And a surface that might behave differently to Sunday’s.

Team news:

Namibia: Change this XI? Why would you do that?

Possible XI: Divan la Cock, Michael van Lingen, Stephan Baard, Jan Nicol Loftie-Eaton, Gerhard Erasmus (capt), Jan Frylinck, JJ Smit, David Wiese, Zane Green, Bernard Scholtz, Ben Shikongo

Netherlands: Similarly, the Dutch should keep faith with the side who got the job done, if only just, on Sunday. 

Possible XI: Max O’Dowd, Vikram Singh, Bas de Leede, Tom Cooper, Colin Ackermann, Scott Edwards (capt), Roelof van der Merwe, Tim Pringle, Logan van Beek, Fred Klaassen, Paul van Meekeren

Sri Lanka: Binura Fernando has been approved as a squad replacement for Dilshan Madushanka, who has been ruled out with a torn quadriceps. The Lankans have to find a way to get Lahiru Kumara into the side, perhaps at the expense of Dushmantha Chameera.  

Possible XI: Pathum Nissanka, Kusal Mendis, Dhananjaya de Silva, Danushka Gunathilaka, Bhanuka Rajapaksa, Dasun Shanaka (capt), Wanindu Hasaranga, Chamika Karunaratne, Lahiru Kumara, Pramod Madushan, Maheesh Theekshana

United Arab Emirates: What do you do when you lose even though you put your first-choice team on the field? Put them on the field again.

Possible XI: Muhammad Waseem, Chirag Suri, Vriitya Aravind, Chundangapoyil Rizwan (capt), Basil Hameed, Zawar Farid, Aayan Khan, Kashif Daud, Karthik Meiyappan, Junaid Siddique, Zahoor Khan

What they said:

“We’ve got to stay humble. There’s a lot of cricket to be played still in this tournament. There are no guarantees of any success going forward. This game doesn’t work like that.” — Pierre de Bruyn is determined to keep Namibia’s feet firmly on the ground after Sunday’s famous victory.

“We’ve played Namibia before. We know the strengths they have, and we’ve got our strengths. For us it’s to go out there and play our game, not worry too much about the outside noise and focus on what we can do.” — Max O’Dowd on how the Netherlands will keep the focus on Tuesday’s game.

“Somehow we have to win. No matter what, we have to win the next two matches. I think the boys all know that. We are definitely going to put more than 100% in the next two matches.” — Sri Lanka’s Chamika Karunaratne feels the pressure, perhaps explaining his wonky mathematics. 

“They have been beaten by Namibia, and they can be beaten.” — Robin Singh, UAE’s coach, isn’t going to let the Lankans forget what happened on Sunday. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Proof of SA’s pudding bowl of talent running over being eaten at T20 World Cup

“Teams like Afghanistan and Scotland attract the type of guy who wants to move his career forward and is probably blocked from doing so in South Africa.” – Ray Jennings on the slew of SA coaches at the tournament.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

EVEN by South African cricket’s singular standards, it’s been an interesting few days. On Saturday, CSA managed to congratulate Lungi Ngidi alone on his team’s triumph in the IPL. On Sunday, Ray Jennings highlighted that the head coaches of seven of the 16 teams at the T20 World Cup were his compatriots.

Also on Sunday, Chris Greaves — a former delivery driver and current golf course greenskeeper who went to the same Johannesburg school as Graeme Smith — rocked and rolled with bat and ball for Scotland. And Curtis Campher — who went to another Johannesburg school, which was also the alma mater of Kagiso Rabada — took four in four for Ireland.

On Monday, under the radar of all that, Temba Bavuma made a stolid rather than spectacular return to action after 50 days out with a broken thumb. And CSA’s Social Justice and Nation-Building hearings resumed with rebuttal testimony from some of those implicated in the first round of cathartic, necessary, long overdue scab-picking.

“Congratulations Lungi Ngidi on claiming the 2021 IPL title with Chennai Super Kings,” CSA posted on social media, despite the fact that CSK’s squad also featured Faf du Plessis and Imran Tahir. Du Plessis, whose 59-ball 86 clinched the final against Kolkata Knight Riders in Dubai on Friday and made him the tournament’s second-highest runscorer, justifiably responded: “Really???”

David Wiese, these days of Namibia, blasted the snub as “absolutely shocking”. Dale Steyn came off his long run in a series of posts that included a description of the message as “disgusting” and warned CSA were “opening a can of worms for themselves”. He also offered advice: “Delete the post and add all the men involved, save yourself the embarrassment and ridicule.” 

CSA did just that: “Congratulations to all the South Africans who competed in and claimed victory in the 2021 IPL Final with Chennai Super Kings. Notably Faf du Plessis who put in a man of the match performance.”

By then the toothpaste was well out of the tube — and, not for the first time, all over CSA’s face. That Ngidi didn’t play a single match in this year’s IPL only made the damaging episode more difficult to understand. Neither can the mess be explained away by the fact that, unlike Du Plessis and Tahir, Ngidi is contracted to CSA. If the suits consider worthy of their recognition only those who are currently in their employ then they have shambled to a new low. It also doesn’t wash to argue that, of the three players, only Ngidi is at the T20 World Cup. Any discussion on that topic would have to start with Du Plessis’ shocking omission from the squad. With depressing predictability, social media’s bottom feeders didn’t need long to posit the poisonous nonsense that Ngidi was named because he is black and Du Plessis ignored because he is white. 

There was something of that ugly narrative in the reaction to Jennings, also on social media, doing the math on the nationality of head coaches at the tournament; Mark Boucher, Russell Domingo, Graham Ford, Mickey Arthur, Lance Klusener, Shane Burger and Pierre de Bruyn are in charge of South Africa, Bangladesh, Ireland, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Scotland and Namibia. 

Asked to elaborate, Jennings told Cricbuzz on Monday: “There’s been a period of time where people like Lance Klusener, Pierre de Bruyn and Shane Burger have gained quite a lot of experience as coaches. They’re recognised at a certain level. Teams like Afghanistan and Scotland wouldn’t attract top international coaches. They attract the type of guy who wants to move his career forward and is probably blocked from doing so in South Africa.”

Blocked by what? Essentially, by an overabundance of excellence. The country’s elite schools produce more quality talent than the comparatively inadequate professional system is able to absorb. The same holds true for coaches, so they go elsewhere. Still, there are anomalies. Like Jennings himself. Days after returning from the UAE in 2014 with the under-19 World Cup trophy in his squad’s luggage, CSA said his services were no longer required. Cue more clumsily squeezed toothpaste.

Regardless, the proof of South Africa’s pudding bowl of talent running over was there to be eaten in Oman and Abu Dhabi on Sunday. Greaves, until recently an Amazon driver and — according to his LinkedIn page — still a greenskeeper at St Andrews, came to the crease with Bangladesh having reduced the Scots to 52/5 inside 11 overs. His 28-ball 45 set them up for a respectable total of 140/9. Greaves then took 2/19 in three overs of sniping leg spin to clinch a famous six-run win. Not bad for someone who might have remained firmly out of the limelight had he not, while bowling to England’s players in the Wanderers nets in January 2010, told Jonathan Trott his mother was British.

If that sounds familiar it might be because word that Campher’s grandmother was Irish became part of dressing room conversation during a game between an Easterns and Northerns Combined XI and Ireland in Pretoria in February 2018. With that the course of the former South Africa under-19 player’s career was rerouted to the northern hemisphere. For him, there would be no emptying trucks of parcels or keeping the fairways fabulous to earn a crust. And he showed why by dismissing Colin Ackermann, Ryan ten Doeschate, Scott Edwards and Roelof van der Merwe with consecutive deliveries to wreck the Netherlands’ innings and set up Ireland’s seven-wicket win. Here’s the twist: Ackermann, Ten Doeschate and Van der Merwe were all born in and made their way in cricket in South Africa.

Bavuma’s first innings since September 2 didn’t have a hope of competing with the drama of those plots, unless he sustained another injury. Happily, he didn’t. But his return couldn’t have come in less auspicious circumstances: a T20 World Cup warm-up match against Afghanistan on an unhelpfully sluggish pitch at Abu Dhabi’s Tolerance Oval, one of the Sheikh Zayed Stadium’s out grounds. Bavuma batted in accordance with the lowkey script, facing the first dozen balls of the match for a solitary single, and needing 22 deliveries to reach double figures. He had made 31 off 38 when he swiped at a wide delivery from Mohammad Nabi, and turned on his heel and walked without waiting for the umpire to confirm the edge to Mohammad Shahzad. It wasn’t as pretty as Bavuma’s batting usually is, but it will do for now.

Across the equator and far away, some of South Africa’s domestic administrators were going chapter and verse through claims of racist treatment made against their organisations at the SJN. Where previously the room had been filled with the white-hot emotions of those who had been wronged, this was all about coldly calculating another version of what had happened during the game’s troubled past. Some sins were admitted, others denied, and still others cast as fiction.

Interesting. But probably no more than the next few days.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

If you’re David Wiese, home is where the kit is

“I’d like to think there is still a place for us in the South African set-up. Whether there’s too much animosity towards us for deserting and going away, or whatever, we’ll have to wait and see.” – David Wiese on cricket after Kolpak.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

DAVID Wiese keeps “a couple of crates in my garage” in Pretoria, where he still lives despite being among cricket’s most travelled players. Into those boxes goes the kit he has amassed from turning out for, at last count, 19 teams in every format except Test cricket and including new-fangled novelties like T10 and The Hundred.

“I need to make a plan with it all at some stage,” Wiese told Cricbuzz from his hotel room in Abu Dhabi. “You think you might need it someday, and then the next tournament comes along and you get another kit and another helmet. It just keeps piling up.”

When next he’s home — briefly, no doubt — the pile is set to grow. Wiese will play for Namibia, the country of his father’s birth, in the T20 World Cup. That may seem a mercenary move for a 36-year-old allrounder who has 14 T20 franchises on his CV. It isn’t, as he explains: “Back in the day when I was playing for Easterns [regularly from October 2005 to October 2011], Namibia played on the domestic circuit in South Africa. As soon as they caught wind that my dad was born there and I could get a Namibian passport, they started talking to me.

“It was always something that was in the back of my mind, but then I started playing for the Titans and got picked for the Proteas and it kind of fell away. And after playing for South Africa I would have had to wait four years to play for Namibia. So while the thought has always been there I’d be lying if I said I expected to be here. I never thought I would actually end up using my Namibian passport.”

Now that he has, what did he think of the chances of a team who were last at this level at the 2003 World Cup? “We are underdogs of note, and I think everybody has written us off. But what I’ve gathered from the Namibian side is that’s almost the way they like it.” In a country that is 64% desert and where teams travel hundreds of kilometres to play a club match, toughness comes standard.

Then there’s Pierre de Bruyn, Namibia’s coach, who also played for Easterns and the franchise they were part of, the Titans. But never with Wiese, who is eight years younger. Even so, the hard-scrabble culture of cricket at Willowmoore Park in Benoni — famously the flat pitch and small, fast outfield where Denis Compton plundered 300 in a minute more than three hours in December 1948 — is not a long way from what it takes to succeed in Namibia. “Pierre was one of those hard Easterns players, and he’s instilled a lot of that into the Namibian side,” Wiese said. With Albie Morkel, another Easterns and Titans stalwart, also aboard the good ship Namibia as a consultant, fighting spirit shouldn’t be in short supply. There’s more South Africaness on hand in Richard das Neves, the assistant coach and strength and conditioning specialist, and Maurice Aronstam, the team psychologist. The mere fact that the Namibians have those kinds of bases covered suggests they are serious.  

“Nobody’s expecting us to make it through [the opening round], but we can use that to our advantage,” Wiese said. “We’re playing Sri Lanka in our first game [in Abu Dhabi on Monday], and they could easily under-estimate us and we could catch them unawares. It’s going to be hard work, but I feel we have one or two surprises up our sleeve.”

He sounded like he meant it, which doesn’t fit with the idea of the hired gun who arrives, plays and leaves in short order. In 2019 — the last time cricket was unaffected by the pandemic — Wiese featured in 66 matches for six teams in five countries. He popped up for the Tshwane Spartans in the eliminator and final of the MSL that year. In August this year he replaced Mohammad Nabi, the Afghan allrounder who went home for personal reasons, for the London Spirit’s last two games in The Hundred. Could he, unlike many of us, make sense of cricket’s latest terrible infant? “Everyone thought it would be a 16.4-over T20 game, but it wasn’t. It had a completely different feel and it was a good tournament to be involved with. Fortunately for me I came in a bit late. By that time the guys had kind of … not figured it out, but they had realised it was completely different to T20. They’re only small shifts but they’re really significant. Small things like bowlers can bowl back-to-back overs and the new batter has to face when he comes in. The T20 game could take a leaf out of that book.” From there it was across the Atlantic to play five matches for the St Lucia Kings in the CPL.

How did Wiese stay focused in the maelstrom of travelling and playing? “When you get that busy and play so many games you rely on momentum. There’s not a stage where, for two or three weeks, you’re not hitting balls. You’re constantly playing, so you have to catch momentum and keep going. Your body gets trained for that and you just keep working and switching on for the next tournament and the next tournament and the next tournament …” Sounds awful, unless you’re Wiese: “I love travelling and playing in all these different tournaments, and meeting new people in the different teams. It’s been hard work, but I’ve thoroughly enjoyed it.”

Did he feel he belonged anywhere, or was it all a blur of batting and bowling on far-flung fields punctuated by adding another layer to the crates in the garage? “I’ve played for Sussex for the past six years, so I’ve got a deep emotional attachment to them. I’ve always had a good time there and they’ve looked after me nicely. In the PSL, I’ve played for the Lahore Qalandars for the past three seasons. The owners have stayed the same, the management has stayed the same and they’ve kept the core base of local players. So you start building relationships with those guys, even though it’s only for a four or five-week period every year. But within those weeks you spend a lot of time together and you get to know each other well. There’s an emotional bond there because of the opportunities they’ve given me. They’ve shown a lot of faith in me by retaining me. You want to repay that faith to the owners and managers and everyone.”

Wiese hit the road in January 2017, when he signed a Kolpak contract with Sussex. He had played six ODIs and 20 T20Is for South Africa with middling success, and Dwaine Pretorius and Andile Phehlukwayo loomed as threats. “I saw that the door was shutting, not necessarily in T20s but definitely in ODIs. Dwaine had done well, Andile had done well.”

He had kept the Titans in the loop for “three, four months”, and had told them of his decision by the time he answered a call from CSA to hear he had been picked for South Africa’s white-ball series against Sri Lanka. “I was in a bit of shock, and I said, ‘OK, cool … Thanks’. The next morning, when I woke up, the media all over were saying I had signed Kolpak. I didn’t make that announcement. I had to phone back and say I was withdrawing.”

That doesn’t square with the conventional narrative of South Africa’s racially targetted selection policies forcing white cricketers to go elsewhere to stay in the game. “I felt that CSA had moved on from me and it was the right time to make that change,” Wiese said. “If I hadn’t signed Kolpak could I have played a couple more ODIs? Is the argument that when Andile took my spot, it filled a demographic need? But his ODI stats were really good and he deserved his position. My Kolpak move was never about me thinking the system had screwed me over. I had a family and they offered me a three-year contract; it was financially appealing.”

Although Wiese’s choice was revealed in the same few days that brought news of Kyle Abbott and Rilee Rossouw doing the same, he escaped the lashing they took in public. But he didn’t avoid CSA’s efforts to make Kolpaks unwelcome in South African cricket. “The way they treated us you can argue that we could have contributed more to the domestic set-up than what was allowed,” Wiese said.

The Kolpak era ended on January 1, and several previously vilified figures have since returned to the South African domestic fold. “For CSA it’s probably a good thing because they won’t be losing so many players. From a UK point of view, the Kolpak rule strengthened the county circuit. They can’t say we just went there and didn’t do anything. We made their players better by playing against them.”

Now what? “Could we get back into the system at CSA? Have too many bridges already been burnt? I’d like to think there is still a place for us in the South African set-up. Whether there’s too much animosity towards us for deserting and going away, or whatever, we’ll have to wait and see. I’d like to think there’s a bigger picture.

“Last year Andrew Breetzke [the chief executive of the South African Cricketers’ Association] got in touch with us and said they want to sit down with the Kolpak guys and mend fences so we could play domestically again to add experience and almost help out. I’d love to play another season in South Africa. The Titans will always be close to my heart and I’ll always consider them my home team.”

Home. Where is that, exactly? Maybe where the kit is. Until it’s in a crate in the garage.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Leading Edge: Enoch Nkwe deserves better

Geoff Toyana and Mpho Sekhoto – frontline batters both – took guard at Nos. 9 and 10 in their only innings and didn’t bowl a delivery between them. Ah, weren’t those the days?

TELFORD VICE in London

IT’S trapped in the amber of another time, perhaps another world. At least, it seems that way.

It’s an artefact and a cautionary tale, and a reminder that, after everything, we’re dealing with human beings. It’s a scorecard from a game played almost 17 years ago at the Wanderers.

Through a gap in the stands to the left at the Golf Course End you could see a glimpse of grass even greener and plusher than one of the most green, plush outfields anywhere in the game. Much further to the right the bluegums swayed and spoke in the breeze high above some of the most sun and storm struck bleachers in all of sport.

A gaggle of reporters were gathered in the always refreshingly open-air pressbox above the Corlett Drive End. It was absolutely unbelievable that, five months to the day after that game, much of the stand below them would be decked out as temporary accommodation for the hordes of journalists who would turn up to cover the 2003 men’s World Cup final.

All of which is the same today, even though so much has changed. Not least that the punters have long since got their seats back from the press.

Ian Howell and Craig Schoof were the umpires for that four-day match, and thereby hangs its own history. Howell was the kind of left-arm slow bowler you just don’t see anymore, and a damn fine one. Schoof was the son of Dudley and the nephew of Ossie, famous men in white coats both.

Stephen Cook, Adam Bacher, Grant Elliott and Daryll Cullinan were one team’s top four. They had David Terbrugge and Clive Eksteen in their attack. 

Derek Crookes, Andrew Hall, Pierre de Bruyn, Albie Morkel, Dylan Jennings and André Nel were in the other dressingroom.

All were products of the unbearable whiteness of too much about the game in South Africa.

Not that everybody involved was white. Johnson Mafa shared the new ball. In the first innings anyway: he didn’t bowl in the second dig. Geoff Toyana and Mpho Sekhoto — frontline batters both — took guard at Nos. 9 and 10 in their only innings and didn’t bowl a delivery between them. Ah, weren’t those the days?

None of which has turned out to be as topical as what happened in the 11th over after lunch on the first day, when a gangly kid of 19 armed with, it seemed, nothing more than soft eyes and a big smile — and, it turned out, an excellent technique — took the long walk down those ridiculously elongated stairs and onward to the middle to make his first-class debut.

He was from Soweto. Or the other side of the world compared to the Wanderers. He had, by then, played for Gauteng’s under-19 and B sides and in a pre-season friendly — all with limited batting success. Indeed, he had made a better impression with his medium pace.

But that was to change over the course of that day and the next, when he spent more than six hours at the crease, faced 297 balls, hit 20 fours, shared a century stand with Cullinan, and scored 106.

His name was, and is, Enoch Nkwe.

Or is it? Some sources list him as Enoch Thabiso Nkwe, others as Thabiso Enoch Nkwe. Was South African cricket uncivilised enough not even 17 years ago that it couldn’t be bothered to get the names of first-class players the right way round?

Cricket was to afford Nkwe only 41 more first-class matches, in which he scored two more centuries. Life took him to the Netherlands and brought him home, but injury meant he never had the playing career he should have.

He deserved better then and he deserves better now. He represents so much but also nothing besides himself, and he deserves a fair chance at doing both to the best of his ability.

It’s time to escape the amber and to look past the towering bluegums and the impossibly green golf course and to see the truth as it is.

The moment is yours, Mr Nkwe. 

First published by the Sunday Times.