Windies woe after van Beek’s Dutch double

“You just go out there, keep your head still and hope for the best.” – Logan van Beek’s advice for super over success.

Telford Vice / Takashinga

TWO teams came to Takashinga on Monday dreaming of better days in the men’s World Cup qualifiers. One left holding a handful of hope, the other plunged into pointless purgatory. No such tension prevailed across town at Harare Sports Club, where one side already knew they were bound for bigger things when they took on their hapless, homeward-bound opposition.

The Netherlands are that hopeful side, having earned two precious Super Six points. But, as with all things worthwhile, they didn’t come easily. Instead it needed a super over to separate them from West Indies in a match that was left tied after 748 runs had been scored. The Windies will also progress from the group stage, but with no Super Six points. For a team who have won two World Cups and reached the final of another, that is a catastrophe.

In the super over, Logan van Beek clubbed Jason Holder for three sixes and three fours; all 30 of the Netherlands’ runs. Then van Beek took the ball, claimed two wickets, and kept the damage in West Indies’ reply to eight runs.

“We’ve got two points, that’s the main thing,” van Beek said. “That’s what we came here to do. We’ve given ourselves a chance to qualify [for the World Cup].” Did he expect those points to be so difficult to secure? “It was always going to be hard. West Indies come out and bully you in how they hit the ball. As a bowler it’s intimidating. But we held our nerve. They got away [to 374/6], but [between innings] some of our boys said that’s not enough. You just go out there, keep your head still and hope for the best.”

Christchurch-born van Beek’s grandfather, Sammy Guillen, played eight Tests for West Indies and New Zealand from December 1951 to March 1956. He wore his multiculturalism with pride: “I’m still West Indian, still Dutch and still Kiwi. My grandfather will be upstairs chuckling to himself that I actually hit the ball over the boundary and not to a fielder.

“I’ve trained a lot to bowl yorkers and to hit sixes. Sometimes the opportunity presents itself and you try to take it with both hands. If you stick at it long enough you’re going to have a moment like this. Just keep turning up and you never know what could happen.”

For the second time in three days — in the wake of West Indies’ loss to Zimbabwe at HSC on Saturday — Darren Sammy found himself lumped with having to make sense of it all. “We’ve got ourselves to blame, two crucial matches with points on offer where we’ve got ourselves into good positions and we’ve let it slip,” Sammy said. “It’s a true reflection of where we are as a team. A lot of things have to change. Some of the decisions we made makes you question what’s going on.

“I watched the way the Netherlands batted and the way they ran between the wickets, those are the things I need to try and instil in my team. It was a lesson for our guys. I can safely say we’re the worst fielding team in this competition. We cannot display this kind of attitude and call ourselves an international team.”

That the Dutch could keep abreast of a target 77 runs bigger than any they had successfully chased seemed unlikely. But as the runs rained up, down and all around in a brilliantly run 90-ball stand of 143 shared by Scott Edwards and Teja Nidamanuru, who hammered 111 off 76, Holder was heard loudly exhorting his teammates in the field to “be your brother’s keeper!” It’s a lesson the Windies will want to learn ahead of the challenges they will face in the coming days. 

Zimbabwe, who beat the Windies and the Netherlands, will take four points forward. Either Sri Lanka or Scotland will join the home side on that perch after their match at Queens Sports Club in Bulawayo on Tuesday. The other game in the City of Kings, between Ireland and the United Arab Emirates at Bulawayo Athletic Club, is a dead rubber.

Unbeaten Zimbabwe lurched into a higher gear at HSC on Monday, putting up their record total of 408/6 and thrashing the United States by 304 runs — the second-biggest win in all 4,602 men’s ODIs yet played. Mercifully the yankees, who lost all four of their matches, are going home. As are Nepal, the UAE and, surprisingly, Ireland.

The Irish have been among the louder voices protesting the World Cup’s reduction to 10 teams, which was the case in 2019 and will be again in India in October and November. Not since 1992, when nine teams lined up, has the field been so small.

Ireland made their World Cup debut in 2007, when there were 16 teams, and they were among 14 in 2011 and 2015. They have won only seven of their 21 World Cup games and tied another, but their successes have tended to be if not seismic then significant — over Pakistan and Bangladesh in 2007, England in 2011, and West Indies and Zimbabwe in 2015.

The Irish have in the past made a decent case for a bigger World Cup, but they didn’t put their runs and wickets where their mouths are to get there this time. Muddled, unclear, uncertain selection let them down, and will cost them a USD1-million World Cup participation fee.

Happier stories in the qualifiers have been told not only by the Dutch but also by Oman and Scotland, who both beat Ireland. The Scots earned two Super Six points for overcoming Oman despite being depleted by players opting to stay with their English counties rather than turn out for the national side.

The Netherlands, too, have been significantly undermined by county commitments. That didn’t matter on Monday, when the most motivating place the Dutch could be was with their backs against the wall. They will never forget Takashinga.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Why teams, not countries, play cricket

“Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do.” – John Lennon

Telford Vice | Cape Town

A Tongan, a Hongkonger and 11 Pakistanis walk into three different dressing rooms. Which teams do they play for? A clue: neither Tonga, Hong Kong nor Pakistan.

To that list of nationalities add 17 South Africans, eight Indians, seven Englishmen, two each from New Zealand and Australia, one from West Indies and another from Ireland. These are players who were born in countries other than those they were picked to turn out for at the men’s T20 World Cup. They add up to 51 of the 240 — not counting the reserves — who started the tournament on October 17. That’s 21.25%: more than a fifth of the total playing personnel and not far from a quarter.

Some teams are more prone to this phenomenon than others. A dozen of the Netherlands’ 15 are not from there. They include Scott Edwards, a Tongan. Sufyan Mehmood, from Muscat, is Oman’s only homegrown player. The rest of their squad consists of nine Pakistanis and five Indians.

Of the 12 sides who reached the second round, only Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, South Africa, Sri Lanka and West Indies did so using solely home-born players. So half of the Super 12 squads featured players from elsewhere, including all four who made it to the semi-finals.

Australia’s Josh Inglis drew his first breath in Leeds. England captain Eoin Morgan is a Dubliner, Tom Curran a Capetonian, Chris Jordan a Bajan from Christ Church, and Jason Roy a Durbanite. At least, they used to call those places home. New Zealand harbour two South Africans — Devon Conway of Johannesburg and Glenn Phillips, an East Londoner — Hong Kong-born Mark Chapman, and an Indian, Ish Sodhi, a native of Ludhiana in Punjab. Pakistan? Imad Wasim hails from Swansea in Wales.

Something similar is true of the backrooms. Ten of the original 16 sides have foreign-born head coaches, including all four of those who didn’t make it to the Super 12. Seven South Africans started the tournament in this capacity. Six of them survived the opening round — Ireland’s Graham Ford was the exception.

This will no doubt come as a blow to those who want cricket to function as a blunt instrument of nationalism; war minus the shooting, in George Orwell’s enduring phrase. The other side of this coin is to wonder whether failure to reach the final four has something to do with a lack of diversity: none of the six purebred sides in the Super 12 stage made it to the semis. Or to think about whether, unlike what the nationalists and the marketing people want us to believe, cricketers play for nothing and no-one except their paycheques, the lure of winning, themselves, and each other. In the words of John Lennon, “Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do.” The social media abuse meted out to Mohammed Shami during the T20 World Cup makes another of Lennon’s lines pertinent: “And no religion, too.”

In South Africa we know all about people trying to claim cricket for whites. Or for English-speaking whites, as opposed to white Afrikaners. Or to consign football to blacks and rugby to white Afrikaners. Brown South Africans — many of whom’s first language is Afrikaans — are accepted, sometimes grudgingly, as sport’s supreme allrounders. Except that all of the above play all of the above, and have done for centuries. 

Cricket in England is currently trying to confront racism, as the game continues to do in South Africa. Doubtless all societies where cricket is prominent need this kind of catharsis. Where the dividing line is not race it could be religion, class, culture or caste. This shouldn’t be taken to mean the game is a particularly poisoned island of inequality in an otherwise just world. We know the world isn’t just, and that injustice has infected cricket as much as it has everything else.

When you watch the T20 World Cup final in Dubai on Sunday, know that you aren’t watching Australia play New Zealand. That’s too simplistic, and an insult to all involved and the planning and work that has taken them this far. What you will see is 22 fine cricketers drawn from squads that include players from five countries split into two teams who have managed to survive until now. That’s the best reason there can be to call the tournament a World Cup — it is more than the sum of its mapped parts.

Neither the Aussies nor the Kiwis can nationalise that truth, and many won’t try. Because we shouldn’t stoop so low as to conflate cricket with patriotism. What we want is a decent contest. Nothing else matters.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Redemption song duet for SA, WI

“We’re here to win the World Cup, otherwise why would we be here?” – Kagiso Rabada

Telford Vice | Cape Town

FEW would have expected batters to dominate in the T20 World Cup, given the pitches in the UAE and Oman. But even fewer would have expected South Africa and West Indies to be utterly dominated at the crease in their opening matches. So the two line-ups will hope to sing a redemption song when they clash in Dubai on Tuesday. 

Australia’s attack bristled with quality on Saturday, but not enough to justify limiting South Africa to 118/9. Similarly, while England’s bowlers pack a sizeable collective punch, they wouldn’t have expected to dismiss the West Indians for 55 in 14.2 overs. Batting conditions weren’t straightforward, as evidenced by Australia needing all but two deliveries of their 20 overs to reach the target.

But Bangladesh’s 171/4 in Sharjah on Sunday looked good until Sri Lanka replied with 172/5, and no-one would have predicted Pakistan’s 10-wicket triumph in Dubai on Sunday immediately after India had posted 151/7.

So while the sluggish surfaces are clearly challenging batters, and will continue to be so throughout the tournament, the only option is for them to meet that challenge. Or at least to do so better than South Africa and West Indies managed on Saturday. Wheeled out, unfairly, on Monday to explain all that, Kagiso Rabada had a hearty laugh when it was pointed out to him that his team’s batters had at least performed better than the Windies’: South Africa’s total was more than double that of their next opponents’. Rabada deserved a chuckle — his 19 not out batting at No. 9 was his team’s second-highest score.

That West Indies’ major suffering against England was inflicted by spin will no doubt inform South Africa’s approach. In a combined 6.2 overs, Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid took 6/19 — usually when their victims were looking to attack recklessly strokes. It would not be stretching a point to posit that Tabraiz Shamsi and Keshav Maharaj are easily as good, if not better, than the English slow poisoners.

Unpacking the South Africans’ fragility at the crease is more complex. They shambled into the sunset thanks to a strange mix of freakishness — Quinton de Kock was bowled by a delivery that bounced high above him after he had edged it into the ground — fine bowling — Josh Hazlewood’s away-swinger that had Rassie van der Dussen caught behind was a thing of beauty — comedy — Keshav Maharaj fell over and was run out as a consequence of neglecting to wear full spikes — and questionable strokes — Heinrich Klaasen closed the face of his bat and blooped a leading edge to backward point. Consequently, the Windies would be forgiven for thinking the South Africans could help them get the job done.

South Africa’s bowlers will be confident of building on Saturday’s performance, which was well supported by their fielders. While the West Indian bowlers and fielders didn’t have a fair chance to measure themselves having been given so few runs to defend, they would have taken heart from removing four of England’s top five inside seven overs and with only 39 runs scored.

All involved in Tuesday’s game will know Bob Marley’s stirring 1980 anthem for justice and freedom, “Redemption Song”, and they could do worse than take to heart its central message: “Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our minds.” Batting is a mind game at the best of times, even more so on pitches that ask tough questions. Finding the answers won’t be easy, but there’s more than enough talent, skill, experience and belief in both teams to pass the impending examination.    

When: South Africa vs West Indies, Super 12 Group 1, 14:00 Local, 12:00 SAST

Where: Dubai International Stadium

What to expect: What do you say about conditions when you’re dealing with teams who succumbed to the lowest totals of the first four matches of the second round? Maybe that they can only improve, or at least get closer to the 150 which would seem to be the par score in this tournament.   

T20I Head to Head: South Africa 9-6 West Indies (2-1 in World T20 games)

Team Watch:

South Africa

Injury/Availability Concerns: None of consequence. Given the amount of strapping on his hand on Saturday, Temba Bavuma looked like he was heading into the boxing ring. But the thumb he broke in Sri Lanka in September seems to have mended well. The tight groin that took Tabraiz Shamsi out of the warm-up game against Pakistan last Wednesday wasn’t a factor on Saturday, when he bowled all four of his overs.  

Tactics & Matchups: Quinton de Kock’s aggregate of 255 in the five-match series between the teams in Grenada in June and July was easily the highest: no-one else reached 180. But, having reeled off three half-centuries — two of them unbeaten — in four innings for South Africa and Mumbai Indians in September, he has since failed to reach 30 in his last six T20 innings. His team need him to come good on Tuesday. Thing is, he averages 14.25 facing Dwayne Bravo and 28.20 against Andre Russell in this format.  

Probable XI: Temba Bavuma (c), Quinton de Kock (wk), Rassie van der Dussen, Aiden Markram, Reeza Hendricks, David Miller, Wiaan Mulder, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Anrich Nortjé, Tabraiz Shamsi  

West Indies

Injury/Availability Concerns: Happily, fitness issues are not among the Windies’ problems. But they are no doubt still trying to cover the bases left uncovered by Fabian Allen’s withdrawal with an ankle injury last Wednesday. That said, Akeal Hosein proved himself a capable replacement on Saturday. 

Tactics & Matchups: That Chris Gayle is capable of wreaking havoc is hardly a secret. It’s also clear that, at 42, he is in decline: he has scored only one half-century in his last 27 T20I innings, and it’s been more than five years since he made the second of his two centuries at this level. But the good news, for the West Indians, is that he is unusually effective against South Africa than any other opponents — his strike rate of 177.94 in T20Is against them is higher than when he is facing any other country’s bowlers.  

Probable XI: Lendl Simmons, Evin Lewis, Chris Gayle, Roston Chase, Dwayne Bravo, Nicholas Pooran (wk), Kieron Pollard (c), Andre Russell, Akeal Hosein, Obed McCoy, Ravi Rampaul

Did you know? 

Reeza Hendricks needs seven more runs to become the seventh South Africa player to reach 1,000 runs in T20Is. Roston Chase’s claims for selection are only strengthened by the fact that he had a batting strike rate of 144.33 and a bowling economy rate of 6.92 in this year’s CPL.

What they said: 

“We need to rock up with proper intensity and play close to our best. That’s what we’re here to do. We’re here to win the World Cup, otherwise why would we be here?” — Kagiso Rabada

“Chris [Gayle] has been a wonderful servant for West Indies cricket. We still expect great things from him, but he also does a lot in terms of addressing the room and helping the younger players. Sometimes we tend to just look at performances, and we tend to think that the numbers don’t match up.” — Roddy Estwick

First published by Cricbuzz. 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.