Steve, stick your 51 players where the sun don’t shine

“Rugby wasn’t a black man’s sport,” All Black coach Steve Hansen shows an unforgivable level of ignorance.

Times Select

TELFORD VICE in London

IF you, like the rest of us, have held the notion that rugby is a 15-player game as dear as the fact that gravity rules, please be disabused. Turns out we’ve got it the wrong way round: it’s a 51-player game.

That’s according to someone who should know: Steve Hansen, coach of the All Blacks, the gods’ own rugby team, a side who invariably sit atop the rankings as solidly as the elephant’s toilet — which some people still refer to as the Voortrekker Monument — is anchored to the apex of Pretoria’s Unity Heights.

The All Blacks have won 445 of their 581 matches. That’s a success rate of 79.13%. They scored 67 tries in their 14 matches in 2017 alone, which is 19 more than the 48 people who fell victim to homicide victims in New Zealand last year.

Little wonder, then, that New Zealand’s rare losses make bigger headlines than anything else in the Land of the Long Flat Victory March. So does Hansen really need 51 of the finest rugby players on the planet to contest, and probably win, only five matches?

“Bringing in the wider squad players also allows us to grow our player depth and will expose them to the international arena, which we think will be great for their development and, in turn, will benefit New Zealand rugby in the long term,” he said on Monday in explaining why he had named, for his team’s tour to Japan and Europe, a squad of, yes, folks, 51.

A mere 32 will journey to Yokohama to play a Bledisloe Cup Test on October 27. Nineteen more will join them for a game against Japan a week after that. Around 20 of the famous 51 will leave early on their westward way for fixtures against England, Ireland and Italy.

Fifty! One! Hansen’s mouthy explanation for that outrageous number doesn’t wash, nevermind that those “wider squad players” might think he’s calling them fat.

Closer to the truth is that rugby has become a game that mangles bodies with the kind of impunity that drains the blood from the hearts of battlefield generals. So what does rugby do? It puts more bodies on the line to feed the beast. Got to keep the customer satisfied, the suits say. The monster, more like.

Indeed there’s a joke of questionable taste to be made of the fact that the only uncapped player in the 32 going off to play Australia is flank Dalton Papali’i. That’s not the uncomfortably funny bit. This is: Papali’i is in the mix because Same Cane is out for the rest of the year, which he will spend recovering from neck surgery. Lol!

But wait. There’s more. Props Nepo Laulala and Joe Moody, lock Brodie Retallick, and flanks Liam Squire and Dane Coles are all limping back from assorted injuries. Ha bloody ha!

Yes, the World Cup looms. But if Hansen doesn’t know who his best players are we can tell him from here, and for nothing — they’re the blokes who helped you win 11 of those 14 games in 2017 and eight of nine this year, ya great lug.

They’re the same ones who won the Rugby Championship in 2017 and this year — the All Blacks have won every edition since the event’s inception in 2012, and 10 of the 16 Tri-Nations tournaments that predated it — and who will probably claim World Cup glory in 2019. 

That said, Hansen belongs to that sub-species of homo sapien we call, with undeserved kindness, the prop. He’s retired? No he hasn’t: once a prop, always a prop. It takes one to know one — many years ago a No. 3 was stitched to the back of this reporter’s jersey, though he never got anywhere near Hansen’s level.

But not all props are as dumb as Hansen was in his interview for Peter Bills’ book, “The Jersey: the Secrets Behind the World’s Most Successful Team”.

“They are the only team in sport I know that doesn’t pick its best team,” Hansen was quoted as saying of South Africa.

“I understand what they are trying to do but … Nelson Mandela understood it better than anyone else. He knew that the Springboks was a team that could unite the nation. I still believe it is. If they got things right and allowed it to develop naturally, it would. And you would get the right people in the team. In the end, it would be a multi-cultural team.

“Rugby wasn’t a black man’s sport, but it was the sport that would unify the country in a way that no other sport or business could. Now I think that unity isn’t there so much. As a nation, it has got such a lively history and it has created a whole lot of things we will never understand, because we were never part of it.

“There is a lot of ill feeling. But the thing they don’t want to fall into is actually reversing that. That is a pretty political statement but when you look at the rugby, one of my great mates, Heyneke Meyer, found out that having to select a team based on what colour a man’s skin is, goes against all the principles and spirit of sport. What it does is create a situation where, one, you are not picking the best team and, two, the guys that get picked are thinking, ‘Am I here because of the reasons of quota or because I am good enough?’.”

There’s a lot that’s wrong with all that, from the assertion that racist coaches, selectors and administrators would allow non-racial rugby to “develop naturally”, to the just plain bullshit that “rugby wasn’t a black man’s sport”, and plenty more besides.

And that from a coach at the centre of a system that doesn’t seem to think stealing so much playing talent from neighbouring countries doesn’t “go against all the principles and spirit of sport”.

Funny how one of those black South Africans who don’t play rugby, Aphiwe Dyantyi, scored twice in the Boks’ 36-34 win over the All Blacks in Wellington on September 15. Funnier still how that South Africa starting XV included three black players, one of them the captain, Siya Kolisi, with four more on the bench. Ha bloody ha. Lol.   

Tell you what, Steve — take your 51 players and stick them where the sun don’t shine.

And try not to get too many of them injured.

SA face tall order at WT20

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Lisbon

SOUTH Africa won’t want for a challenge in the World T20, which will be played in Guyana, St Lucia and Antigua in November.

The first group match, against Sri Lanka, and their last, against one of the two sides from the qualifier in the Netherlands next month, are likely to be their lowest hurdles.

But Dané van Niekerk and her team will have to be at their best to beat their other opponents — hosts and current champions West Indies and England, who won the inaugural tournament in 2009 and have reached two other finals.

Van Niekerk talked a good game in an International Cricket Council release announcing the fixtures on Monday, in which she was quoted as saying: “I think we have a very dynamic side. We have hitters, we have runners, we have variation in the bowling attack as well.

“We are a free-spirited team and we enjoy it because we can express ourselves.”

South Africa’s best performance in the five editions of the event so far was the semi-final they reached in 2014. They will play all their group matches in St Lucia.

Two semi-finalists will emerge from each group of five teams, and the final will be played in Antigua on November 24.

Both semis are also scheduled for Antigua, and on the same day.

In Taunton on Saturday, Van Niekerk did a fine job of leading her side out of the darkness they would have been plunged into three days previously.

Having crashed to New Zealand and England in their T20 double-header on Wednesday, and taken ownership of a few unwanted world records in the process, South Africa got their act together well enough to beat the home side by six wickets at the weekend.

Raisibe Ntozakhe and Van Niekerk each went for less than a run a ball in England’s 160/5.

Then Lizelle Lee and Sune Luus overcame the loss of Laura Wolvaardt to the fourth ball of South Africa’s reply with stand of 103. They won with three balls to spare.

South Africa’s next and last round-robin game is against New Zealand in Bristol on Wednesday.

The final of the triangular tournament is set for Chelmsford on Sunday.

South Africa’s World T20 fixtures:

Nov 12: v Sri Lanka, St Lucia

Nov 14: v West Indies, St Lucia

Nov 16: v England, St Lucia

Nov 18: v Qualifier 1, St Lucia

Knock-out matches:

Nov 22: Semi-final 1, Antigua

Nov 22: Semi-final 2, Antigua

Nov 24: Final, Antigua

Perspective vital in glow of SA’s Bangla bash

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Florence

THE good news is South Africa won all five of the one-day internationals and three T20s they played against Bangladesh these past two and a bit weeks.

Bad news? None. Dané van Niekerk’s team have done everything asked of them, and more.

“To play eight games and win all eight, we don’t so that often,” Van Niekerk said in Bloemfontein on Sunday after her women completed their whitewash with a 23-run win in a T20 reduced by rain to nine overs-a-side.

“So maybe it’s the start of really great things with this team.”

Maybe is the operative word, because even as South Africa’s triumph glows it highlights the bigger challenge to come in the shape of the three ODIs and T20 triangular series they will play in England in June.

Perspective is worth plenty, and in this instance it is that South Africa have played more than three-and-a-half times as many white-ball games as the Bangladeshis: 178 ODIs and 79 T20s versus the visitors’ 35 and 37.

The home side also have exponentially more experience in foreign conditions, in which they’ve won 32 of their 82 matches.

Bangladesh, who have contested 32 games on the road and won only two, have had just 11 more matches in total than South Africa have had on the Asian subcontinent alone.

The South Africans have understanding for the Bangladeshis’ plight. “It’s not easy coming out of your comfort zone,” Shabnim Ismail said. “Bangladesh haven’t really travelled much and they haven’t played much.”

Ismail knows of whence she speaks: South Africa lost 13 consecutive T20s between August 2008 and October 2010, and four of the first 11 Tests they played before winning a match.

Almost six years after Bangladesh became an international side they have yet to play a match in the longest format.

The value of South Africa’s superior experience is the poise they showed in games like Sunday’s, when Van Niekerk said they played “loud music in the changeroom” to help them relax despite the unusual circumstances.  

“The batters did their best, but the way we went about setting up that score [64/4] wasn’t great,” she said. “I was a bit worried: [defending] eight an over in a nine-over game; you really don’t know what’s going to happen.

“But the way [the bowlers] went about executing their plans, I couldn’t have asked for better.

“The batting showed the fluster but our bowlers had time to assess the wicket.”

Ayabonga Khaka took 3/10, Marizanne Kapp 2/8, and Ismail went for only five runs, each from two overs, to limit the Bangladeshis’ reply to 41/6.

More of that level of performance will be required in England, where all three ODIs will count towards the International Women’s Cup, the qualifying mechanism for the 202 World Cup.

The T20s will be important for South Africa’s bid to win the World T20 in West Indies in November.

Having reached, and almost won, their 2017 World Cup semi-final against champions England, a Caribbean cruise to victory would be the best news for South Africa.

South Africa squad for England tour:

Dané van Niekerk (captain), Lizelle Lee, Chloe Tryon, Mignon du Preez, Marizanne Kapp, Shabnim Ismail, Ayabonga Khaka, Masabata Klaas, Raisibe Ntozakhe, Suné Luus, Laura Wolvaardt, Andrie Steyn, Zintle Mali, Stacey Lackay, Tazmin Brits.

England tour itinerary:

ODIs:

June 9: Worcester (11am)

June 12: Hove (1pm)

June 15: Canterbury (2pm)

T20s:

June 20: v New Zealand (1pm), v England (5.40pm), both Taunton

June 23: v England (1pm)

June 28: v New Zealand (1pm)

July 1: Final, Chelmsford (3pm)

Kiwi rugby man to hear Rabada’s appeal

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

SOUTH Africans hoping to see Kagiso Rabada left fly in the third test against Australia at Newlands next week will be heartened to learn that the person who will decide his fate is a rugby man from New Zealand.

What’s a nudge on Steve Smith’s shoulder — which took Rabada to eight demerit points and saw him banned for the last two tests of the series — compared to an All Black flank leaving a trail of felled opponents on his way to the tryline?

But Michael Heron, the queens counsel who the International Cricket Council confirmed on Friday as the judicial commissioner for Rabada’s appeal hearing on Monday, won’t see things that way.

Heron is no pushover. On February 27, in his role as a SANZAAR judicial commissioner, he slapped Reds lock Lukhan Tui with a three-week ban for a spear tackle on Rebels scrumhalf Will Genia.

Heron, a former New Zealand solicitor general, is also a judicial commissioner for New Zealand Rugby, and he conducted the official review into the All Blacks’ performance at the 2007 World Cup.

“I’ve always loved rugby and cricket … but I’m a terrible player,” he said in an interview with LawFuel New Zealand in December.

Heron will have 48 hours after the hearing, which will be conducted via videoconference, to make his decision.

So Rabada will know his lot by Wednesday — the day before hostilities are set to resume in one of the most intense test series in decades, which is level at 1-1 with two matches to play.

Kingsmead in control as big match looms

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Durban

HEINRICH Strydom’s desk was down there somewhere on Wednesday, under the lever arch files and the A4 pages and whatever else complicates an administrator’s life the day before a match at their ground.

Not just any match — the first test between South Africa and Australia. And not just that — it will be the first test that Strydom will preside over in his career as an administrator.

It’s also the first test Kingsmead will host since August 2016, when not a ball was bowled on the last three days because of an outfield that had been recently relaid at Cricket South Africa’s (CSA) insistence and was thus wholly unprepared to come unscathed through the unseasonal storm that deluged Durban on the night after the second day.

Spectators wearing hats and sunblock to ward off the more dangerous aspects of the perfect cricket weather were treated to umpteen sightings of Ian Gould trodding various parts of the outfield and shaking his head disapprovingly, and the other umpires nodding in seemingly silent acquiescence.

Strydom was among those spectators: “I was here for a job interview during that test.”

The outfield was rated “poor” by the International Cricket Council, but Strydom made a better impression — in May last year he became chief executive of the KwaZulu-Natal Cricket Union.

Which brings us to Wednesday, when Kingsmead baked in 28-degree heat and sweated in 65% humidity.

The outfield was an uninterrupted swathe of closely cropped grass of the greenest green. In a word, perfect.

What of the bit in the middle, especially in light of the controversial surfaces South Africa resorted to in their series against India last month?

“The pitch that we’ll play on, some of the guys have said that it may be slowish,” Strydom said. “But my groundsman [Wilson Ngobese] says he’s pretty happy with what they’ve achieved.”

Strydom said there hadn’t been interference from beyond Kingsmead in the pitch’s preparation, although he was unsure if “maybe they spoke directly to my groundsman”.

Either way, it shouldn’t matter.

“South Africa and Australia have very similar teams with one world class spinner and a world class seam attack, and the same goes on the batting front,” Strydom said, and he should know having played first-class cricket for North West.

“Whatever pitch you get I don’t think it will favour one side more than the other.”

That said, by the look of it on Wednesday it is a pitch of contrasts in that there was significantly more grass near the Old Fort Road end than at the Umgeni River end.

Faf du Plessis is unlikely to complain if the pitch is on the slower side.

Thursday’s game will be his first since he broke his right index finger during the first one-day international against India at the selfsame Kingsmead four weeks ago.

He wore a dressing on the finger to his press conference on Wednesday and kept the dodgy digit well clear of contact when he shook hands.

Strydom’s greeting was less complicated and accompanied by an easy smile and, “Sorry for the way my office looks at the moment.”

Not that an apology was required. His desk was laden, but the neatly straight lines in which everything on it had been arranged spoke of careful planning and control.

It’s a big match, but it’s just another match.

Reward offered for rugby’s safe return

This is not about nostalgia. It’s about when rugby was a simpler, better, faster game.

Times SELECT

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

THE hardest bastard yet to pull a Springbok jersey over his head walks into a Cape Town café. This is not a joke.

His right eye is ringed by swollen, blue-black bruised skin. He seems to have acquired a limp, which is apparent as he takes up a table with a man who has red and yellow tattoos of flames licking up his neck.

Flame fella: “Jirre, it took three of us to fuck him up, hey.”

Former Springbok: “And all for 120K. I mean, I know for a fact that he put 2.3-million down on another deal. So why don’t you just pay the 120K?

“And those cars he gives away! They aren’t even his to give away. I said to him, ‘China, my brothers are asking me where the money is. This looks bad, hey’.

“But, jissus, he’s broken now.”

Other fella: “What if he doesn’t pay again?”

Former Bok: “Then we’ll have to moer him again. I promise you, I will make that man kiss your feet. He will call you sir.”

They don’t make rugby players like that anymore, which is probably a good thing. Thing is, they also don’t make rugby like they used to.

Years ago the same player burgled a late try to snatch an improbable victory over the All Blacks.

Up in the pressbox we hurried through changes to reports that had all but declared New Zealand the winners even as celebrating South Africans made the stadium shake from its foundations to its floodlights.

Would the place remain in one piece? Happily it did. But other questions swirled, and they remain unanswered.

How had the player not knocked on? Had he even touched the ball?

When something similar happens now everything stops and we are condemned to endure the purgatory of slow motion replay after slow motion replay that somehow must help a hapless official stuck in front of a television monitor distinguish between the ball and a player’s invariably equally pale, just as bulbous knee.

All those years ago all we had was the referee and all he had was a quick look at the touch judge, and in a flash the Boks had a try they probably didn’t score. And here some of us are with a priceless memory of that magical moment.

Good luck trying to think of a moment made magical by the methodical plodding of a TV ref.

The importance of right and wrong? That’s philosophy, not sport — which if it isn’t dramatic is boring.

This is not about nostalgia. It’s about when rugby was a simpler, better, faster game. When a ruck was a ruck and a maul was a maul and we didn’t need a miked-up official to tell us the difference.

Remember scrums? They haven’t been seen for decades.

Proper scrums, that is, when front rows line up, feel their locks’ shoulders connect with that special spot where butt meets thigh, and crash into likeminded opponents. And the loose forwards hang on for all their worth.

Take it from someone who was, in a galaxy, far, far away, a tighthead: the trickiest part of scrumming is avoiding a clash of heads with someone in the front row opposite. That and making sure, when your lock puts his hand between your legs, he latches onto the waistband of your shorts and nothing else.

The rest comes down to technique, competitive instinct and strength, strictly in that order.

There was none of this clumsy choreography to the tune of, “Crouch! Bind! Set!”, which sounds like instructions for putting a bowl of jelly into the fridge.

You need to scrum? Get on with it: scrum already.

Part of why the game that used to be rugby has fallen victim to nanny statism is that players are no longer built on a human scale.

The steroid smacked behemoths who thunder around the field these days could kill one another by flexing their triceps at close quarters. They need the help of a referee, armed with pavlovian powers, just to stay alive.

That’s not to say everything about the game has changed for the worse.

Modern tactical kicking is so accurate it looks like the ball is being dropped by drones at points pre-determined on a map.

It resembles nothing like the result of a weirdly shaped object being met, briefly and brutally, by the even more weirdly shaped human foot.

Lineouts have become ballet in boots with players pirouetting hither and thither until the ball is precision delivered to the anointed receiver.

Back in the day hookers threw to Nos. 2, 4 or 8 and no-one else, and hoped like hell the ball would get within a metre, give or take, of hitting the target.

Once every other season some atheist hooker would think it a good idea to fire a short, flat throw at the prop standing at the front of the lineout. Usually the prop had been forewarned, but when they were caught short the comedy was classic.

Tightheads in particular used to have the catching skills of a drunk sloth because they had been drilled to never so much as think about the ball.

As a prop you always played the man, and only the man. The ball? There was no ball. It didn’t exist.

Here you go: catch what doesn’t exist.

And who knows how much money in unpaid debts would be enough for today’s players to hand out a beating.

Considering Japan and Toulon fullback Ayumu Goromaru earned R14.4-million before endorsements and bonuses in 2017, a piddling R2.3-million — nevermind R120 000 — doesn’t seem nearly enough.

Tougher tests await SA, New Zealand

Times Media


TELFORD VICE in London

NEW Zealand, South Africa won’t need reminding, are the only team besides England and Australia to have won the women’s World Cup.

South Africa, New Zealand won’t need reminding, made their highest total in the tournament’s history to beat Pakistan in Leicester on Sunday.

All of which will be in the mix in Derby on Wednesday, when South Africa take on New Zealand.

Dane van Niekerk’s team overcame three runouts to get past Pakistan’s 206/8 with three wickets standing.

“Seeing the lower order perform against Pakistan, we haven’t really done that in a while but we’ve spoken about it a lot,” Van Niekerk told reporters in Derby.

“It gives the batting line-up a lot of confidence knowing that we have got capable batsmen at the bottom to finish games.

“Hopefully we don’t have to use them too often but it’s good [for] momentum.”

Or, as she might have said, a win is a win. But the South Africans were 113 without loss before seven wickets crashed for 64 runs to make the contest too close for comfort.

New Zealand, the champions in 2000, had no such drama in their tournament opener against Sri Lanka, winning by nine wickets with 12.2 overs to spare.

But the Lankans are the weakest team in the field, so South Africa should present the Kiwis with a stiffer test on Wednesday.

And there’s a chance New Zealand will be distracted by the fuss over their captain, Suzie Bates, bringing up a century of one-day internationals.

“I never thought I’d play this long,” Bates told reporters. “I was at university and cricket was bit of a hobby.

“I really didn’t see it going professional. So to still be playing at 29, and be able to play in my 100th game, is exciting.

“When I first started and got really serious about trying to be as serious as I can be, and when I started leading the team, I probably didn’t have a lot of things outside of cricket.

“When it didn’t go well, it was terrible. When it did, you were on top of the world.”

Women’s cricket, Bates said, had come a long way.

“It’s unrecognisable from when I started. It was hobby for everyone.

“Many were studying, some were at school.

“People got away from their day jobs for tours and live a dream.”

Time to wake up — the dream is real.

Stephen Cook: dignified, decent, dropped

Sunday Times


TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

STEPHEN Cook has left the building, the city, the province, the country and the hemisphere, and he has done so with the dignity that comes from living life almost too decently for his own good.

That quality was as evident when he ran onto the field wearing a non-player’s bib after being dropped for the third test against New Zealand in Hamilton last month as it has been when he has taken guard.

Cook couldn’t complain about being axed, and he didn’t. Seventeen runs in four innings is not what opening batsmen are supposed to be made of, even if they have scored three centuries in 19 innings.

He has, then, gone quietly and is almost 14 000 kilometres away from his Johannesburg home in Durham, with whom he will spend the first half of the English summer.

Success there could be his ticket back into South Africa’s team for their test series against England in July and August. It’s a plan bespoke for a comeback, surely …

“It’s well-documented that I haven’t scored many runs in my last few innings and should I do well in those conditions it would probably help my cause,” Cook said before leaving for England.

“I’m not oblivious to the fact that, in international cricket, a couple of low scores and you are under pressure. I’d be sticking my head under a rock if I didn’t think so.

“But if I went to Durham with sole aim of, ‘Me, me, me’ I’d be letting myself down horribly. I committed myself to Durham to try and help them get promoted. If I can do that I’m sure my own cause will be served anyway.”

There’s altruism in that, but also first-hand experience.

“Whenever I tried to to force my way into the test team, when I thought, ‘I just need to get a hundred here’, inevitably I’d get nothing. But if I said, ‘I’m just going to play for the Lions and try and get us a win’, the runs flowed.”

Flowed? This is Stephen Cook we’re talking about, a batsman who at the crease has the look of a crab in desperate need of a chiropractor.

“I’m probably the guy who takes the mickey out of the way I bat the most,” he said. “I’ve never been insulted by the comments about it.

“When I’m scoring runs the opinion out there is, ‘He has his own technique and he really makes it work for him; he’s difficult to bowl at because he plays a bit unconventionally’.

“When it doesn’t go well I look ‘scratchy and non-confident’. It’s a fine line.

“In New Zealand I looked horribly out of form but I didn’t feel that way. I felt way more out of form in Australia.”

That was in November, when Cook ended a streak of five innings without reaching 50 by scoring 104 in Adelaide.

“In New Zealand I felt that if I could just get past that new ball I could get a hundred. But I got out to that new ball.”

And then he was left out.

“I didn’t see it coming. I thought I was going to get the third test to try and make amends.

“You always think you’re one innings away, and I had that picture of Adelaide in my mind.

“If I did it there under massive pressure why couldn’t I do it again?

“But I don’t believe that’s necessarily the end. I think I have a value to add beyond the runs I score. I believe in a mix of characters in a team, and I’d like to think that, since I started playing for South Africa, that’s coincided with the resurgence of the team.

“Hopefully I bring a good calmness and experience to the team – even though it’s not test experience it’s knowledge and a life spent in the game.”

But runs help, like they did when Cook scored 115 on debut against England in Centurion in January 2016.

“I know from being given one opportunity in my first test and scoring a hundred and from being on my last chance in Adelaide and getting a hundred, you always feel like it’s potentially there.”

It’s there alright, in the building Cook has left. And it’ll be there when and if he returns.

Why we’re all talking about Markram

Times Media


TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

IT’S become difficult to read the sport pages without seeing an argument for the inclusion of Aiden Markram at the expense of Stephen Cook in the test squad South Africa will send to England in July.

This is not one of those stories.

Instead it’s an explanation for why that’s happening.

“If we didn’t have a young opening batsman in the country scoring as many runs as Markram we wouldn’t be saying the same thing,” former national selector Ashwell Prince said on Monday.

“Obviously he’s a bright talent and he clearly looks like one for the future.

“Whether that future has arrived only time will tell.

“But if you didn’t have someone like that coming through the ranks would you really be looking at replacing Stephen Cook?

“A month ago people were talking about how solid the partnership was between (Dean) Elgar and Cook.

“Three or four innings down the line suddenly that’s not the case anymore.”

Cook has scored three centuries in his 19 test innings. But, on the tour to New Zealand last month, he scraped together 17 runs in four trips to the crease and was dropped for the third test in Hamilton.

Markram, who famously led South Africa to triumph at the 2014 under-19 World Cup, scored 161 for the Titans in the One-Day Cup (ODC) final against the Warriors in Centurion on Friday and 183 against the Lions at the Wanderers on March 17.

All told, Markram had 508 runs at an average of 56.44 in his nine innings in the ODC – which is 165 fewer in one more innings than his opening partner for the Titans, Henry Davids.

But Davids doesn’t open the batting in first-class cricket.

Markram has opened in 42 of his 45 innings in first-class cricket, although only nine times at the tougher franchise level.

But he has made those opportunities count, scoring 162 and 139 in his first two knocks for the Titans and 53 in his third. Another 53 followed two innings later.

“He’s a very talented player and I think he will play for South Africa one day,” Prince said.

“Whether that should be against England, that’s fortunately not my decision anymore.”

Not that the top of the order was South Africa’s only batting problem.

“Quinton de Kock has been a luxury at No. 7, where he has come in to rescue the situation more often than not,” Prince said, and questioned comparisons with Australia’s former wicketkeeper-batsman, Adam Gilchrist.

“Gilchrist wasn’t coming to the crease under these circumstances all the time; Quinton is coming to the crease under pressure all the time.

“I don’t know if any kind of situation fazes him much, but that points fingers at the top and middle order.”

In New Zealand, De Kock walked to the wicket with the scoreboard reading 252/5, 206/5, 94/6, 148/5 and 59/5.

On average, the batsmen above him got out for 29.19 runs each. De Kock’s average for the series was 52.50.

“Any batsman in the top six who isn’t averaging over 40 is not scoring enough runs,” Prince said.

“The team is being put under pressure because of that, and rather than Quinton de Kock coming in to take the game away from the opposition he’s having to rescue the situation.”

Of South Africa’s top six in New Zealand only Faf du Plessis and Elgar had averages of more than 40.

We don’t need to be told who the others are, and neither do they.

As Prince said: “Batsmen know when more is needed from them.”

The boys are back in town

Sunday Times


TELFORD VICE in Auckland

CAN it be only a year ago that South Africa limped home from their cursed place, India, having gone nowhere quickly in the group stage of the World T20? It can. It is. 

Have just nine months past since they looked like they couldn’t hold their rum punch in the triangular series in the Caribbean? Yes.

Those disappointments followed India’s tainted victory in a test series there – if the pitches in Mohali and Nagpur weren’t cheating, nothing is – and a demoralising home defeat by England, who deserved their success.

Perhaps South Africa could only go up from there, but the way they recovered told of a team who remembered who and what they are.

They’ve done so despite having changed their test captain twice, and having to make do without AB de Villiers, Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel for much of 2016-17.

We’ve seen 5-0 thrashings of Australia and Sri Lanka in one-day series and test series wins over New Zealand, twice, Australia and the Lankans.

We’ve seen players step into breaches that seemed unbreachable.

We’ve seen heart and soul and gees.

We’ve seen a team that deserves to be called South Africa.   

“Its been extraordinary to lift ourselves up from a real challenge last year; it’s been a real team effort,” Faf du Plessis said after South Africa’s campaign ended with a 1-0 test series victory in New Zealand.

Du Plessis’ contribution to all that, and more, cannot be overstated. The man who should have been made test captain when Graeme Smith quit two years ago is showing why. Clearly, he knows what he’s doing. Just as clearly, he enjoys the job.

“I can only captain as well as the guys do on the field,” Du Plessis said.

“For me, it’s about always trying to challenge the guys to be better.”

And that’s not going unnoticed.

“He’s done a great job, not just through his leadership but also with the bat,” Russell Domingo said.

“He walks the walk – he demands a lot from his players but he’s willing to go out there and live up to the demands that he places on the team.”

But, as Du Plessis said, South Africa are “not sitting back … and thinking everything is sunshine and roses”.

They can’t, not with a Champions Trophy and a tour to England looming – and with a batting unit that has had to battle its way back from the brink too often.

“We’ve got some quality in our batting line-up but it’s a matter of getting them confident and getting them playing well again,” Domingo said.

“All of the batsmen have put in wonderful performances over the last couple of years.

“We need to get them back into that space.”

Du Plessis bemoaned “the lack of hundreds, the lack of good starts”.

“We are playing with our backs against the wall most of the time, and that’s a real concern for me,” he said.

The fourth day of the third test in Hamilton, when South Africa lost their first five wickets 46 runs apart, was a case in point.

“The two hours we had there was really soft,” Du Plessis said. “There were a few tired bodies (who had spent almost 12 hours in the field during New Zealand’s first innings) but never can that be an excuse.

“We need to be really strong in those moments because we knew that there was a test series on the line.

“All the dismissals were soft; not one of them was from an extraordinary ball.”

The season’s steady exceptions have been Du Plessis himself and Quinton de Kock, who between them scored a third of all the runs South Africa made across all formats.

But questions must be asked over the future of JP Duminy and even the great Hashim Amla, both of whom spent much the campaign playing on reputation.

Bowling? Two words: Keshav Maharaj. Go you good thing.