Procter’s lightning will keep striking in many hearts

To his ultras he was Proc or Proccie or Michael John. Gloucestershire became, with pride, Proctershire. Nobody ever called it WGshire.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

MIKE Procter wore his greatness lightly, as if he understood that the gift bestowed on him — to play cricket better than almost everybody else on earth — didn’t make him special. Perhaps he knew his talent was a happy accident. Maybe he didn’t think about it much. Either way he had none of the ego that infects others who aspire to his stature, and even some who fly as high as he did.

Once he had met you, he counted you among the people he knew. He would chat readily and casually when you saw each other again. He smiled effortlessly and laughed easily and loudly. He spoke straightforward South African English. He was as comfortable having a quick word on the stairs as he was commanding the centre of a stage. When the phone rang he picked up, and he had no problem being quoted. He did these things without a hint of superiority or smugness, or as if he was doing you a favour.

That you had not played at the level he did, nevermind anywhere near as successfully, didn’t matter. He was a star who did not, or chose not to, see his aura. Maybe, if you’re Mike Procter, everyone else is so far below your level they might as well play dominos, not cricket. So all the Test and first-class players, clubbies, social cricketers, umpires, scorers, groundstaff, caterers, commentators, coaches, managers, administrators, bus drivers, autograph hunters, presidents, potentates, parasites and press you encounter melt into a mass of mediocrity. But you treat them with the respect many among your peers would struggle to show those they consider beneath them.

The recipients did not reciprocate. Procter was revered to his face and behind his back, and to the extent that some of his devotees daren’t mention his name. To his ultras he was Proc or Proccie or Michael John. Gloucestershire became, with pride, Proctershire. Nobody ever called it WGshire. Doubtless Procter wouldn’t do more than smile with quiet warmth if he knew the county club’s flag will fly at half-mast until the start of the championship on April 5.

Perhaps all that discomforted Procter was the force of nature he barely controlled in his lusty frame when he bowled. His run-up, which started near the sightscreen, was a flight of fury by the time he reached the crease. He was about effect, not aesthetics: the substance of swinging the ball around corners at pace was more important than the style employed.

There was a brutishness about the way his right arm whipped towards the batter so quickly — and with no guidance from a broken rudder of a left arm — that everything else was forced into action with indecent haste. Consequently his delivery stride was short enough for it to be claimed he bowled off the wrong foot. He didn’t, but to keep him upright his right foot had to land a nanosecond after his left. The violence triggered shock wave after shock wave through his blond mane. His follow-through called to mind a speeding truck skidding off a highway.

The whole wasn’t so much a bowling action as a reaction to the human body being subjected to an outrageous amount of compressed energy. With every ball he looked like he had been struck by lightning.

Even in an era of unflattering playing attire, Procter came apart at the seams. His shirt was unbuttoned to the sternum, the points of its collar flapping and snapping like pennants in a hurricane. His sleeves were shoved more than rolled to the elbows.

His batting — which was his strong suit when he arrived — was more orthodox, though no less arresting. Blessed with a cracking cover drive, he could also cut like a knife fighter and smite bouncers through and over square leg and midwicket as if they had insulted his mother. He was a genuine allrounder in the sense that captains clamoured for him as a batter as much as a bowler. He was also a captain fine enough to be admired in the role by that captain of captains, Mike Brearley. 

Whatever Procter was doing, you wanted to watch it; including the ridiculous catches he took in the cordon. Like he did at Headingley in August 1970 as part of a Rest of the World XI playing against England. Happily the moment has been preserved in the amber of YouTube.

Procter’s hands are on his hips well after Eddie Barlow has started bustling towards Alan Knott. The delivery swings sharply towards Knott’s pads, straightens after pitching, takes the outside edge, and screams low and fast towards the slips. Procter, at second slip, would have seen precious little of the ball’s flight before and after it pitched. He dives to his right, his arm parallel to the ground and maybe a centimetre above it, and takes a clean catch before any of his teammates move a muscle — save for Garfield Sobers at third slip, whose feet remain rooted as he takes a glance over his left shoulder like a man just managing a glimpse of a Ferrari disappearing down a street.

Procter, his cap having tumbled off his head, holds up the catch in triumph where he lays, and again as he stands and accepts congratulations. He is, as always, modest. His smile is wide, his hair, for once, sleek. Forty-four days away from his 24th birthday, he is the picture of bulletproof youth. But already the knee problems that would plague him, but not derail him, are apparent — once Procter is back on his feet he flexes his right leg twice.

This was Procter’s 103rd first-class match. He would play 401 in all along with 271 list A games, and bowl 77,769 deliveries across both formats. That’s a lot of lightning strikes. Jacques Kallis, a grown-up or less exciting version of Procter, was 55 days into his 24th year when he played his 103rd first-class match. He would appear in 257 at that level and play 600 senior white-ball games. Kallis bowled 45,453 deliveries, or just 58.45% of Procter’s total. 

When the pain in his knee became too great Procter bowled off-spin. And bowled it well. In Bulawayo in October 1972, he took one wicket with seam and eight with spin. His 9/71 in that innings remain his career-best figures. Procter was the captain of Rhodesia, who played in South Africa’s Currie Cup. Their opponents were Ali Bacher’s strong Transvaal side, who would win the title that season. The Bulawayo match was their sole loss.

Bacher, the only player dismissed not to fall to Procter, told Cricbuzz: “I was taking off my pads and I couldn’t believe what I was seeing: Procter was bowling off-spin!” As the wickets tumbled and defeat loomed, Johnny Waite, Transvaal’s manager and batting coach, summoned his team’s No. 11, David Lewis, for a coaching session. “Johnny told him he knew how to face off-spin, and how he had dealt with Jim Laker on a turning Oval pitch,” Bacher said. “He told him where his feet needed to be, how to push forward, how to angle the bat. This went on for a good half-hour before the ninth wicket fell.”

Lewis, a Cardiff-born leg spinner with a career first-class batting average of 9.38, took guard with Waite’s advice swirling in his head and fielders swarming the bat. Then he looked up and saw, near the sightscreen, Procter at the top of his long run. He had reverted to bowling fast. “Oh! My dear!” Lewis is reputed to have said.

Procter was not without complexity. The Bulawayo match was played eight years into the 15 years of brutal race war that would lead to the establishment of Zimbabwe. What was he doing there then, and in the 58 other first-class and list A games he played for a team representing an oppressive, illegitimate regime? As recently as September 2016 he defended the rebel tours that undermined efforts to end apartheid. He spent too much money betting on horses and, like many of us, drank too much for his own good. 

But, unlike most of his cohort, whose careers were stunted when South Africa were banned because of apartheid, Procter could see beyond the boundaries of selfishness. “What is a Test career compared to the suffering of 40-million people,” he told ESPNCricinfo in May 2012. “Lots of people lost a great deal more in those years, and if by missing out on a Test career we played a part in changing an unjust system then that is fine by me.”

Procter credited playing in England with opening his eyes to racial injustice. Had that 1970 match at Headingley been in the South Africa of the time, he and Sobers would have been barred by law from being on the same field together; much less from sharing a dressingroom or a beer after play.

Maybe because of his lack of airs and graces, maybe because he needed the money, maybe both, Procter served the game long after he played his last match. He was a coach, an administrator, a commentator, a selector, and a match referee, all at a high level.

Mortals, other fine players among them, would consider that an impressive lifetime in cricket. But what if they had scored centuries in six consecutive first-class innings? What if they had taken hattricks in two consecutive matches? What if they were the only player in history to take a hattrick and score a century in the same first-class match twice?

Other players might think that would make them special. Michael John Procter, who achieved those feats and much more, did not. His great heart gave out on Saturday, but the memory of him will beat viscerally and vicariously in other hearts. It is there, not in the mind, that Procter will be held tight. It is there that he will be felt. It is there that his lightning will strike forever. 

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Kingsmead returns to green glory days

“I’ve never seen the colour of the grass at Kingsmead like it is right now.” – Keshav Maharaj

Telford Vice | Durban

OLD-TIMERS joke that the only way to tell the pitch from the outfield at Kingsmead used to be by locating the stumps and the creases. Then you took guard to face Neil Adcock, Mike Procter, Vince van der Bijl, or other fine fast bowlers on a surface that rivalled a snooker table for greenness. 

But Kingsmead’s emerald fire has dwindled. Tests here have become attritional struggles against spin and the elements. This is where, in August 2012, South Africa and New Zealand bowled and faced only 99.4 overs in a game ruined by a sodden outfield. It’s also where Rangana Herath took match figures of 9/128 in December 2011 to seal Sri Lanka’s first win in the country. Almost eight years later, the Lankans returned to Durban to spark what would be a 2-0 series triumph — the only Test rubber won by an Asian team in South Africa. Indeed, conditions at Kingsmead have become un-South African enough for the home side to have won only one of their last nine Tests here.

This time, it seems, things might be different. Dean Elgar and Keshav Maharaj, a local, mind, have both spoken of the unusual amount of grass, and its colour, they have seen on the pitch being prepared for the match.

Thereby hangs a theory. Kingsmead hasn’t hosted a Test since Sri Lanka’s win in February 2019, and South Africa have since played 10 matches in the format at home. The ground staff can’t do anything about rain and bad light, which are both frequent factors in matches here and seem set to feature again, but they can try to ensure the surface gives the home side’s fast bowlers something to work with and that it lasts five days. Not doing so, on both counts, would seem detrimental to the ground’s future as a Test venue. It seems they have taken that possibility seriously enough to relay the table.

Even so, Elgar might grimace at the unfair irony of Kingsmead finally delivering a seamer’s pitch when most of his first-choice fast bowlers are not around. Kagiso Rabada, Marco Jansen, Anrich Nortjé and Lungi Ngidi, along with Rassie van der Dussen and Aiden Markram, have all high-tailed it to the IPL. The unfortunates among us who don’t somehow consider professional cricket a profession could see this as betrayal of national duty. The rest of us accept it as a business decision made by people whose primary motivation for playing cricket is to be paid. Would any of them turn out for South Africa for free?

Of course, that’s not Bangladesh’s problem. They have to find a way to maintain the momentum generated by their stunning 2-1 win in the ODI series, their first in any format in South Africa. It will help that seven of the players who helped achieve that famous success are in the Test squad, and that Tamim Iqbal, Taskin Ahmed and Mehidy Hasan — who starred in the ODIs — are among them. It will also help that, with Herath and Allan Donald in their coaching staff, they have both bowling bases covered. And that Russell Domingo knows Kingsmead as well as any coach. And that, thanks to the IPL, which has taken 128 Test caps out of South Africa’s squad, the visitors are the more experienced side.

But the temporary return home for family reasons of Shakib al Hasan, as iconic a player for Bangladesh as anyone is for any other team, is a setback. Happily, he is due back for the second Test at St George’s Park, which starts on April 7.

Bangladesh have lost all six Tests they have played in South Africa, five of them by an innings. But they have also never played a match in the format at Kingsmead, where India and Sri Lanka have won all three Tests they’ve played since December 2010. Conditions this time may mitigate against a fourth victory for Asian side in five matches in Durban, but that doesn’t mean South Africa will anticipate a lesser challenge.

With the calamity of the ODI series still fresh, and considering South Africa have lost the first Test seven times in their last 11 series — and in both of their most recent rubbers, at home to India in December and in Christchurch in February — the visitors will know their time is now.

When: Thursday, 10am Local Time

Where: Kingsmead, Durban

What to expect: More green grass than has become the norm for a Test here. Even if that is the case, the primary challenge for batters early in the match will likely by swing rather than seam. Then, as the surface slows, spin will come into the equation.

Team news

South Africa: Stand by for changes galore, what with the IPL defections. Keegan Petersen’s return from Covid-19 was always likely, and we could see an overdue debut for Ryan Rickelton

Possible XI: Dean Elgar (capt), Sarel Erwee, Keegan Petersen, Temba Bavuma, Ryan Rickelton, Kyle Verreynne, Wiaan Mulder, Keshav Maharaj, Glenton Stuurman, Lutho Sipamla, Duanne Olivier

Bangladesh: Tamim Iqbal is set to come in for Shadman Ismail, who scored 53 runs in four innings in New Zealand in January.

Possible XI: Tamim Iqbal, Mahmudul Hasan Joy, Nazmul Hossain, Mominul Haque (capt), Mushfiqur Rahim, Yasir Ali, Liton Kumar, Mehedy Hasan, Shoriful Islam, Ebadat Hossain, Taskin Ahmed

What they said:

“I’ve never seen the colour of the grass at Kingsmead like it is right now. Traditionally Kingsmead spins, and I would hope it does from my personal point of view. But I think it will be a decent, traditional pitch.” – Keshav Maharaj on Kingsmead’s return to greenness.

“Experience-wise we are ahead but they are playing at home, so they will get some advantage. Both teams will have advantages but whoever plays good cricket for five days will win.” – Mominul Haque walks a diplomatic tightrope.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Lawson Naidoo: Polymath pads up

“I would hope they support South African cricket rather than a 50-year-old vision of what South African cricket was.” – Lawson Naidoo, CSA board chair, on his compatriots.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

JAMES Brown was in jail. But that didn’t stop the queue from coiling around the block to see the James Brown All-Stars at the Jazz Café in Camden Town in London. Lawson Naidoo was happy with that: not because the “Godfather of Soul” was in the tjoekie but because more punters meant more money to fight apartheid.

It was circa 1990 and one of the venue’s owners, Jon Dabner, supported SA’s freedom struggle by donating the door takings from certain gigs. Naidoo, who worked for the ANC mission in London from 1987 to 1992, was instrumental in establishing the arrangement.

The story captures one of his Naidoo’s numerous lives and a sliver of his colourful times. If you’re old enough to remember the start of SA’s journey towards democracy in 1994, you recall Naidoo as a special advisor to Frene Ginwala, the post-apartheid parliament’s first speaker. If you fancy yourself a builder of a better world, Naidoo’s name registers as the executive secretary of the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution. For politics junkies, Naidoo is a founding partner of the Paternoster Group, a risk consultancy.

If you’re a certain kind of cricket person, you know Naidoo as the founder — in 1998 — and captain of the Spin Doctors XI, who delight in their flannelled foolery in Cape Town’s Friendly Cricketers’ Association. If you’re a more sensible kind of cricket person, you know Naidoo has been chairperson of Cricket SA’s (CSA) board since June.

It’s the most recent CV entry that jars. Not because Naidoo isn’t fit to hold the office, but because of the sorriness of the suits who have too often been charged with stopping SA cricket’s buck.

Ray White, who was forced to resign for undermining transformation efforts, damned the board as “little more than the cricket organ of the ANC”. Famously, Percy Sonn “fell out of his pants”, according to a parking lot eyewitness, after a long and liquid night during the 2003 World Cup. Chris Nenzani’s super power was inflicting something close to death by circumlocution on anyone uninformed enough to ask him a question.

They all came to CSA’s presidency from the provincial structures, where they spent years knee deep in manure backing the right horses until they were the horse to be backed. Naidoo is an independent member of the first majority independent board the game in this country has known, and the first independent director to lead the board. That changes things.

“This is not an ordinary organisation; it’s very complex,” Naidoo told the Financial Mail. “Fundamentally it’s a public asset. It’s not a private entity. It belongs to all South Africans. That brings a greater level of responsibility to everyone that’s involved in it. We’re custodians of a game that’s going to be here long after we’ve gone.”

Naidoo was at Kingsmead on February 5, 1970. He was not quite seven years old. By lunch, when Barry Richards was 94 not out having flayed Australia’s bowlers to all parts, the youngster had found a lifelong passion.

The Group Areas Act had slithered onto the statute books the year before. It would force the removal of the Naidoo family from Durban’s old casbah to Chatsworth. At 12, Naidoo was spirited away from the evils of apartheid to join an elder brother in the UK. He would remain in the other hemisphere for 17 years and earn a Masters in law from Cambridge.

Music became a tether to the real world: “I got to know some of the exiled jazz artists, Julian Bahula in particular and later Dudu Pukwana, and others like Hugh Masekela and Jonas Gwangwa. I got drawn into South African jazz through them.” So much so that, from 2011 to 2014, Naidoo managed the Mahogany Room, a jazz club in Buitenkant Street in Cape Town. Bra Hugh himself graced the stage.

Cricket, too, kept Naidoo from disappearing into Englishness: “The first thing I would check in the newspapers was how the South African players had done in the county championship — Barry Richards, Mike Procter, Clive Rice …”

Many of that generation would struggle to credit people like Naidoo with using sport to help change our society for the better. “I would hope they support South African cricket rather than a 50-year-old vision of what South African cricket was,” he said. “Some of them just don’t get it. The game has moved on and they’ll get left behind.”

To paraphrase James Brown, they won’t feel good.

First published by the Financial Mail.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Leading Edge: Canned interview missed chance to talk about more than cricket

You have to wonder when the lightbulb went on and it was realised that Mark Nicholas interviewing Barry Richards, Graeme Pollock and Mike Procter was a dumb idea.

Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in London

LET’S put three of the whitest white players in the history of whitehood on screen together and have them interviewed by an even whiter player.

It’ll be perfectly fine, as long as no-one mentions the unbearable whiteness of all that being beamed to an audience in a country that is 91.14% black and 100% unequal in every sense that matters.

They’ll talk about the cricket, the whole cricket and nothing but the cricket. That means they won’t talk about the real world they came from that put them on pedestals from which they peer still. They deserve to — they were part of the best team in the game, even though they didn’t play against half the other teams in the game. Because those teams were, you know, black.

They won’t talk about how much they didn’t do to use the privilege they were born into and the position that happy accident helped them attain to fight for a fairer world, and certainly not about how they have no concept of the fact that as long as one of us isn’t free then none of us is free.

Besides, they did their bit when they walked off at Newlands in 1971. They even went to the trouble of writing a statement, which was read out: “We fully support the South African Cricket Association’s application to invite non-whites to tour Australia, if they are good enough; and further subscribe to merit being the only criterion on the cricket field.” Because they know all about being good enough. And about merit. And about how to deploy a semi-colon.

It took a few minutes, and then they went back to what they had always done and would do for years afterwards: play cricket as if their abnormal society was normal. As long as they were able to do that, wherever they wanted to, all was right with the world.

Not a lot has changed. As long as they have the right to talk cricket — only cricket, and only on their terms — everything will be alright. How could anyone possibly object …

You have to wonder when the lightbulb went on at SuperSport and it was realised that having Mark Nicholas interview Barry Richards, Graeme Pollock and Mike Procter during lunch on the second day of the third test against Pakistan at the Wanderers was a dumb idea.

Who turned on the lightbulb? Not Cricket South Africa (CSA), apparently, who said: “All breaks belong to the broadcaster including decisions on what to show during those breaks. There has never been any interference from our side and definitely not on this one.”

Besides, anyone who thinks CSA and SuperSport are on cosy terms in the wake of their messy divergence about the rights for what became, by hook or by crook, the Mzansi Super League probably also thinks the team that called itself “South Africa” in 1970 was the best in the world. 

Who’s idea was the interview? Nicholas’, apparently, who it seems floated it with the three proposed subjects before he spoke to SuperSport’s production staff, who favoured a recorded insert — which was canned after Richards vented on social media.

SuperSport are excellent at putting sport on television. But, as with all rightsholders, journalism is bad for their business.

Thus an opportunity was missed. Richards is as sharp, articulate and willing to engage as he is strident. Procter proved his down-to-earth openmindedness when he was a selector. Pollock is out of touch these days, but he’s still Pollock.

Their voices are valuable and they should be part of the conversation. They should have been put up there, live and in living whiteness. And asked about everything.

Including the cricket? Maybe, but only after the important stuff.

Olivier plots course for place among SA greats – if he keeps his place

Duanne Olivier has missed 15 Tests since he made his debut, and in that time a dozen men have bowled seam up for South Africa.

Times Select

TELFORD VICE in London

DUANNE Olivier is a nightclub bouncer of a bowler, a man who can seem as broad across the shoulders as he is tall. And he’s a long way from short.

There’s menace in the jut of his jaw and an unsettling softness in his eyes: frightening batters doesn’t excite him. It’s just what he does.

Along, of course, with getting them out fast and furious. How fast?

Upwards of 140 kilometres an hour, and with a knack for sending screamers past helmets.

And fast enough to make a simpler, faster better start to his Test career than many of South Africa’s finest bowlers.

He has 41 scalps after eight games — more than Kagiso Rabada, Dale Steyn or Morné Morkel at the same stage of their careers.

Buck Llewellyn also took 41 in the first eight of his 15 Tests, while Mike Procter claimed 41 in the only seven Tests he played.

Alf Hall also played seven Tests, earning 40 scalps, and Joe Partridge and Allan Donald both had 38 after eight.

So Olivier would seem on course for the pantheon. His haul of 24 wickets at an average 14.70 in the three matches against Pakistan is easily his best performance in a career only eight games old.

Should he claim nine or more in his next Test he will join Peter Pollock as the second-fastest South Africa bowler to reach 50 career wickets.

The fastest, Vernon Philander, roared to the milestone in only seven games.

Olivier’s current form is far cry from the kind of bowling that earned him 17 wickets in his first five Tests. What’s changed?

“[Previously] I was still very young, inexperienced, exposed to everything and thinking to far ahead; not concentrating on taking it ball by ball,” Olivier told reporters at the Wanderers after the end of the Pakistan series on Monday. “For this series I just tried to do that every ball.”

If he continues in that vein he could become the sixth South Africa bowler to claim 50 wickets in a calendar year.

Makhaya Ntini and Steyn have done it three times each, Shaun Pollock and Rabada twice, and Donald once.

First past the post was Pakistan’s Waqar Younis, who took 58 in seven matches in 1993, when he bowled 271 overs.

South Africa’s record-holder is Steyn, who claimed 51 in nine games and 357.4 overs in 2013. 

Olivier should bump up his total in the two home Tests in Sri Lanka in February although he’s likely to find conditions less to his liking in the three games South Africa are scheduled to play in India in October.

But at least two of England’s four Tests in South Africa next summer should sneak into 2019, and thus Olivier friendly.

All of which is, of course, selection permitting — which promises to be anything but straightforward what with rivals of the calibre of Lungi Ngidi, who has 15 wickets from four Tests and is due back from a knee injury by the end of February, in the mix.

“It’s not like I’m a certainty in the team where you play every game,” Olivier said.

Indeed, he has missed 15 Tests since he made his debut. And in that time a dozen men have bowled seam up for South Africa, including odds and sods like Temba Bavuma and Theunis de Bruyn.

So it’s complicated. But Olivier’s method is simple, and that can’t hurt — unless you’re the oke at the other end of the pitch.

And as long as he avoids the kind of challenges that have derailed other promising careers.

Olivier won’t, for instance, run into the unfairness that stunted the unofficially mixed race Llewellyn’s career.

Or the business commitments in the textile industry that limited Hall’s time on the field.

Or the isolation that protected opposing Test teams from the terrifying Procter.

But Partridge failed to find favour with the selectors as much as he might have had he not shared an era with Peter Heine and Neil Adcock.

Bulawayo-born Partridge was a complex character who captained his school boxing team but bowled in spectacles.

Aged just 55 and having succumbed to homelessness and alcoholism, he came to a sticky end in 1988 when he shot himself in the head in a Harare police station after being arrested for ducking out on a hotel bill.

Olivier has many reasons to be rather more cheerful, not least the uncomplicated truth that he is what he seems to be: a bloody good fast bowler.

Who could also be a nightclub bouncer …

Procter plays it straight in belated book

Mike Procter has spent 71 years getting the big things right, and bugger the rest.

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

MIKE Procter played the last of his 401 first-class matches — and scored the last two of his 21 936 runs and claimed the last three of his 1 417 wickets — almost 29 years ago.

Yet there he is at a bookshop near you, beaming brightly from the cover of, “Caught in the middle: the autobiography of Mike Procter.”

Why now? Because it’s Christmas, stupid. But also perhaps because Procter’s cricket career extended far beyond what he did as one of its most stellar players.

He was South Africa’s first coach and has been a commentator, a convenor of selectors and a match referee.

Now 71, Procter hasn’t been involved at any noticeable level for years save for a few forays, at the sharp end of the camera, into video punditry.

But it will surprise no-one who knows him should he pop up in some significant roll in future. He is a man of cricket as much as cricket is a part of this man.

The book, which rings true with Procter’s good-natured, straightforward manner, was written by Lungani Zami, who is among the most erudite of South Africa’s younger cricket journalists.

It covers all aspects of Procter’s time in the game and doesn’t duck when the going gets messy.

Like it did during at the Sydney Cricket Ground in January 2008, when Harbhajan Singh was alleged to have racially abused Andrew Symonds.

The saga went back and forth and, as is so often the case in these matters, fact become irrevocably detached from fiction.

It’s hard not to empathise with Procter, who was the match referee — not only because of the whorls within whorls that stained the issue with bumptiousness and absurdity, but also because through it all he had to deal with easily the most arrogant teams in cricket.

Procter’s frank and forthright retelling of the incident and its fallout only reinforces that opinion.

He was also in the thick of the bomb blast that rocked Karachi during New Zealand’s tour in 2002, and Pakistan’s walk-off at The Oval in 2006.

And all that after he had been a member of the lost generation of white South African players whose careers were stunted, but not nearly as much as the many generations of black players who came before and after Procter’s time.

He wouldn’t be human if he didn’t wonder what might have been, but Procter clearly knows he got the better end of the deal compared to his black compatriots.

“It must have been hard to believe that a team that was still almost exclusively white was representing a nation with a rich diversity of people — with white people being in the minority,” he writes in the chapter on South Africa’s first trip to the World Cup in 1992.

Such sensibility has served Procter well over the years, and set him apart from contemporaries who have spent too much of the ensuing years exposing their entitled bitterness over what they consider the theft of their international careers by politics.

It’s all there in the black and white of this book, which should indeed be judged by its cover.

Next to the photograph of the older, smiling Procter is another of him at the moment of delivery.

That famously unorthodox action has reached its zenith: his left leg looks like it’s about to crumple beneath him, his left arm is a pathetic squiggle, and his awkwardly angled upper body is a study in how to cause yourself years of pain.

The unleashed ball is captured a centimetre or five above all that incorrectness.

Its shine tells us it’s new, and its proud seam is as upright as it is possible for the seam of a cricket ball to be.

Michael John Procter has spent 71 years getting the big things right, and bugger the rest.

This book confirms that, however many more years he has left, that won’t change.