SCG fightback a drop in South Africa’s bucket of woe

“We want to be successful all around the world. We don’t want to be a team that only wins at home.” – Malibongwe Maketa

Telford Vice / Cape Town

THIS time last year cricketminded South Africans were as buoyant as a balloon in a sunny park. It was two days after their Test team had beaten top ranked India in a gnarly contest at the Wanderers and three days before the series decider at Newlands. There was admiration, respect and hope.

Maybe Keegan Petersen could and would fill the immense void left by Hashim Amla. Maybe Marco Jansen was more than just outrageously tall and left-arm. Maybe Dean Elgar was the answer to the questions that had been asked since Graeme Smith retired. Maybe people should get off Mark Boucher’s case and let him coach. 

A year on and that balloon seems to have been made of lead and the sunny park has become a swamp in a hurricane. South Africa won at Newlands, reducing no less than Virat Kohli into an impotent caricature shrieking into the stump microphone. But they have lost five of the 10 Tests they have played since, including four consecutively before Sunday’s rain-forced draw in Sydney. In the process they lost a rubber in Australia for the first time in the four they’ve played there from 2008/09.

The cumulative effect of South Africa’s recent failures is that their performance on the last day at the SCG, where they resumed on 149/6, then followed on after being dismissed 220 behind, and reached 106/2 before hands were shaken, has been held up as a turning point towards better days.

“We actually had a conversation last night: we can either go lie down and let Aussie roll us here and create a little bit more embarrassment or we can go and fight out on day five,” Dean Elgar told a press conference. It’s great to see how the guys responded around that.

“There are a lot of learnings to be taken out of today. The flip side could have been that we could have been done here by lunch time and that would have not sat very well in the camp. It’s great to see how the guys responded in terms of how we conducted our conversation into some very good practice today.”

Malibongwe Maketa, the interim coach, concurred: “Today, to come out and fight the way we did, was encouraging. We knew we had to bat way above our average to compete.”

South Africa lost six wickets and scored 212 runs on Sunday. Seen objectively that’s hardly cause for the sighs of relief emitted by Elgar and Maketa. But when you’ve been bowled out for fewer than 200 — once for 99 — in seven of your previous eight innings, 255 in the first innings in Sydney and three of your four batters in the second dig spending at least an hour at the crease looks like a skyscraper of achievement, not the modest two-storey block it is. That’s perspective, and the South Africans could be forgiven for theirs being skew currently.

But they’ve brought that on themselves. They’re in this mess because, after beating England by an innings inside three days at Lord’s in August, they took their foot off their opponents’ throat by changing their XI. Thus the South Africans, in one disastrous decision, disrespected what they had done at Lord’s and paid England respect that, based on that performance, they did not deserve. Grateful for the gasp of air they were granted, Ben Stokes’ ambitious, fearless team smacked the visitors upside the head at Old Trafford and at the Oval. Elgar’s team haven’t been the same since, particularly at the crease.

Yet the difference between the teams in runs scored off the bat in England was a marginal 67. In Australia it was 277. Steve Smith, Travis Head, David Warner and Usman Khawaja each made more than 200 runs in the series, and Alex Carey and Marnus Labuschagne passed 100. Temba Bavuma’s 185 was the highest South African aggregate. Kyle Verreynne and Sarel Erwee were their only other players to reach three figures in the rubber. Verreynne and Erwee are also South Africa’s most recent centurions — they made 126 not out and 108 in Christchurch in February last year. Australia banked four hundreds, among them Warner’s 200 at the MCG, in this series alone. 

Conditions have been an important factor in South Africa’s struggles. Of the six Tests they have played from the start of the England series, only in their last two matches in Australia, in Melbourne and Sydney, were the pitches decent for batting. Having been rattled and rolled in the first four of those games — and come out on the right side of the equation only once — South Africa’s batters couldn’t regroup even on a good surface. Too much tentativeness and doubt had crept in by the time they took guard at the MCG.

“From a confidence point of view, naturally the batters would have been hit,” Justin Sammons, the batting consultant, told a press conference on Friday. “In the [MCG] Test, an area we had been improving on as a batting group — the mental errors we were making — we slipped up. We strayed out of our gameplan.”

Then there’s experience. Australia’s XI at the SCG have 568 Test caps between them, South Africa’s 310. South Africa’s top seven have 307 innings, Australia’s almost twice as many: 591. The disparity persists at domestic level, where Australia’s six state sides play a double round of Sheffield Shield matches and a final. In South Africa this season, first-class teams will play only seven matches each — not least because the inaugural edition of the SA20, which starts on Tuesday, has been wedged into what would normally be time to play the longer format.

“There’s no substitute for experience and you can only gain experience by playing,” Sammons said. “The more games you play the better you’re going to get and the more lessons you’re going to take. It’s an important focus area in terms of how we manage to still look after the first-class system. It’s going to be a tricky balancing act now with the way the world is going. But we do need a way to balance it. We need our guys playing as much cricket as possible. That’s the way you get better.”

It’s telling that a bid to increase the number of first-class matches has been launched by the players, in the form of a resolution taken at the South African Cricketers’ Association annual meeting in November, and not by CSA. The underlying reality is that first-class cricket leaks money, which a T20 tournament can make. Essentially, the SA20 will pay the salaries of Elgar, Maketa, Sammons and everyone else who might see their primary focus as Test cricket. So finding methods to live with T20 is essential.

“We’ve got to think out of the box, as a board or the director of cricket, to find ways,” Sammons said. “There have to be ways. We can’t just resign ourselves to the fact and say, ‘That’s it, we’re not going to play enough first-class cricket. T20 is going to dominate.’ We can’t have that mindset. We’ve got to have the mindset of saying we’ve got to find a way. How we go about that is up to the decision-makers. It’s key for us. We have to play more first-class cricket.”

Sammons sees in Verreynne, who played 50 first-class matches in almost seven years before making his Test debut, and who scored two of South Africa’s four half-centuries in Australia, what the country’s system, albeit flawed, is capable of producing: “His growth has been tremendous, from a technical point of view and mentally. His success lies in being able to play at his tempo and his rhythm. He’s also clear in terms of his identity as a cricketer. He understands who he is and how he’s going to go about making runs. That’s a big part of batting. If you see Dean bat, you know what you’re getting. You see the same thing day in, day out. You would say the same about [Jacques] Kallis or Graeme Smith. I think [Verreynne] has that.”

Sammons also had good things to say about Khawaja, who made an undefeated 195 at the SCG: “You can easily go into the mindset of just trying to survive, in comparison to still being positive. That doesn’t mean you need to be reckless. What Khawaja’s done so well is stay in his gameplan. That’s going to be the key for us — to still have that positive mindset and not make it about survival.”

Khawaja’s reckless hack at a Kyle Abbott away swinger in Hobart in November 2016 precipitated a collapse of 8/32 that sealed South Africa’s innings victory, and with it series honours. Khawaja has since rebuilt his game, anchoring it on disciplined aggression, and was rewarded with three centuries, two innings in the 90s and three half-centuries in 2022. He was dismissed for fewer than 50 only four times in his dozen trips to the crease.

Elgar has walked that walk, but in something like reverse. He has made eight of his 13 centuries in 102 innings since the 2016 Hobart Test, but none in his most recent 31 completed innings; an unbeaten 96 against India at the Wanderers in January an honourable exception. Elgar has gone two years without a hundred, which is unacceptable for a player who leads by example more than by other measures of captaincy. It doesn’t help that, in his six innings in Australia, he made some of his trouble himself by being strangled down the legside three times and falling victim to a runout.

“I accept that maybe once, maybe twice but the third time is something that highly irritates me,”Elgar said. “You have a way of getting out and bowlers target that. Ten years into a Test career, it’s foreign territory for me. It’s something to reflect on and you can either say it’s shit luck or not. I’m going to have an open mind around it and have a look. It’s frustrating that I could never get going and when I did get going I managed to run myself out [for 26 at the MCG].”

As a red-ball specialist in a system short on red-ball cricket Elgar will be able to get away from it all for the next few weeks: “I’m taking as much time off as I want; that’s what I need at the moment. I just want to get on a plane, and go home and chill out and have a braai and maybe go to the bush and play some golf.”

Maketa, who is reportedly on a shortlist of candidates CSA have interviewed for the permanent version of his position, spoke with a refreshing frankness: “It’s important for us to be honest with ourselves. We had a tough series in England and we had a tough series here. We want to compete against the big teams but we don’t have the Test caps they have at the moment. We’ve done well against them in the past and now they are better than us. We brought the best team we had [to Australia] and we didn’t compete.

“Conditions were better than what we’ve played in in the last 12 months. I was quite encouraged that we’d be able to get that 350 par score for us to be able to put them under pressure and we weren’t able to do that. 

“The stats say South Africa is the most difficult place to bat when it comes to Test cricket [with batters averaging 29.63, lower than in any other country that has hosted more than one Test]. We’ve found a way. With the younger batters, do we expose them to better wickets to get enough runs to perform at this level or do we say we are the team that’s going to win at home and we make it difficult for visiting teams? That’s the way we need to look at things.

“If we are comfortable to win at home, we can leave it the way it is. We want to be successful all around the world. Because to win the WTC you have to come here and win, you have to go to India and win. We don’t want to be a team that only wins at home.”

A year ago, South Africans wouldn’t have dreamt they would have to have this conversation. The balloon has burst.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Pitches, politics and perhaps a chance simply to play: being Khaya Zondo 

“You can’t play a game before you’re in it.” – Khaya Zondo declines to wonder what would happen should the MCG harbour another dodgy pitch.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

THE haters won’t like this, but Khaya Zondo’s sense of humour is intact in the wake of the Gabba Test at the weekend, which Australia won in two days. We know this because, told that the most recent Test at the MCG, where the series resumes on Monday, ended in three days, Zondo smiled.

“If it finished in three days that’s longer than the two games I’ve played,” he said during a press conference in Brisbane on Wednesday. “I was saying to one of my teammates that the games I’ve got have each finished in about two days. They’ve both been played on hectically bowler-friendly pitches. But those are the cards we’ve been dealt. I’d love a flat track, and the bowlers would hate it. I’m sure the more opportunities I get I’ll get onto better batting wickets.”

Zondo has featured in three Tests, but his debut sailed below the radar: he was a Covid substitute for Sarel Erwee and his involvement was restricted to fielding for the last hour it took South Africa to wrap up victory by 332 runs over Bangladesh at St George’s Park in April.

But Zondo made a bigger impression at the Oval in September, where his 23 and 16 were among the better efforts in South Africa’s innings of 118 and 169 in a match England won by nine wickets in less than two days of playing time. At the Gabba, Zondo suffered a second-ball duck in the first innings but batted for almost two-and-a-half hours and faced 85 balls for his unbeaten 36. By all three of those measures he was South Africa’s best batter in the second innings.

That’s where the haters come in. Zondo took ugly flak on social media after he was trapped in front by Scott Boland in the first innings. His detractors demanded to know why Theunis de Bruyn or Ryan Rickelton didn’t play ahead of him. De Bruyn’s and Rickelton’s first-class averages are 10.69 and 22.40 points higher than Zondo’s 31.47. It has taken Zondo 220 first-class innings to score his 13 centuries. De Bruyn has 16 tons from 136 innings, and Rickelton 14 from 78.

De Bruyn played the last of his dozen Tests — in which he averaged 19.45 — in Ranchi in October 2019 and has reached or passed 50 only once in 13 first-class and T20 innings for Northerns this season. Even though Zondo has yet to reach a half-century after batting 14 times this summer, it’s disingenuous to say De Bruyn, on current form, has a greater claim to a place in the Test XI than Zondo.  

Rickelton is not in the Test squad. He has been ruled out by torn ankle ligaments and troublesome bone growth, in the same ankle, and requires surgery that he has elected to delay: a reasonable decision considering he is due to earn the equivalent of more than USD58,000 for playing for Mumbai Indians Cape Town in the inaugural edition of the SA20, which starts next month. He is able to keep playing with the help of injections, and has scored four centuries and a 99 in 14 innings across the formats for Gauteng this summer. CSA’s reluctance to take Rickelton to Australia considering his condition is understandable and in line with their policy of not selecting injured players. Replacing him there should he break down would be complicated and take time.

A theory doing the rounds is that an exception has been made for Temba Bavuma and his elbow. So why not for Rickelton? Bavuma sustained the injury during a T20I in Rajkot in June. He decided against surgery, but was passed fit in time to play in a T20I series in India in September and October in the lead-up to the T20 World Cup in Australia. He was rested after the tournament and did not bat in the first innings of South Africa’s tour match in Brisbane from December 9 to 12 because his elbow had flared up again. Malibongwe Maketa, South Africa’s interim coach, suggested the issue returned because of the high amount of preparation Bavuma did in Australia to ensure he was ready for the Test series: “We pushed him hard in the volume of work he did once we got here.” That’s not the same as picking an injured player, or arriving on a tour injured. Besides, Bavuma faced 92 balls in the second innings of the tour match and 70 and 61 deliveries in the Gabba Test. If he’s struggling to hold a bat, it’s not showing.

South Africa’s last Test before they came to Australia, and the only one Zondo and Rickelton have played together, was the game at the Oval in September. Rickelton scored 11 and eight and faced 20 and 15 balls. Zondo made more than double Rickelton’s runs and faced 108 deliveries; more than three times as many as Rickelton. How, then, is replacing Zondo — the incumbent, remember — with Rickelton justified? 

Zondo and Bavuma are black. De Bruyn and Rickelton are white, as are most of those who are making the case for them to play. The complexities of cricket in South Africa are daunting for the uninformed, but sometimes it really is that simple. This seems like one of those times.

About batting in Brisbane, Zondo said: “It was a matter of making sure you defended your stumps, because that’s where the dismissals were happening. There was too much in the pitch for the bowlers to bowl short, and if they did they were wasting their time. But if they put the ball up to the bat and tried to get your pad or nick you off, there was a lot happening.

“Any movement off the pitch — whether it was up or down or sideways — you had to make sure you were ahead of it so that you could adjust accordingly. In the first innings the ball that nipped back for me hit me quickly. In the second innings I made sure I watched the ball more closely and moved quicker, in case it nipped or bounced or stayed low, so I could react.”

Despite being dismissed for 152 and 99 the South Africans managed to limit Australia’s victory margin to six wickets, a testament to the conditions. A green pitch that wasn’t hard enough on the first day allowed the ball to make indentations that hardened overnight to facilitate variable bounce on the second day. Thirty-four wickets fell and just 469 runs were scored in the match. In the previous Brisbane Test a year ago, it took three days as well as just more than a session for 31 wickets to fall and 889 runs to be scored in Australia’s nine-wicket win over England. 

The surface for the South Africa game was rated “below average” — only the third time an Australian pitch has fallen foul of the ICC since the ratings system started in 2006. The other two instances were a “below average” verdict for a women’s T20I at North Sydney Oval between Australia and England in November 2017 and a “poor” assessment of the MCG pitch for the Ashes Test in December the same year.

The Melbourne strip had the opposite problem to the Gabba: just 24 wickets fell but 1,081 runs were scored, among them two centuries and a double century, and the drawn match went all five days. “The bounce of the MCG pitch was medium but slow in pace and got slower as the match progressed,” match referee Ranjan Madugalle said at the time. “The nature of the pitch did not change over the five days and there was no natural deterioration. As such, the pitch did not allow an even contest between the bat and the ball as it neither favoured the batsmen too much nor it gave the bowlers sufficient opportunity to take wickets.”

Of the four Tests played at the MCG since, only one has crept into a fifth day. Last December, Australia completed their win, by innings and 14 runs, over England in the first session of the third day. Jokes aside, Zondo wasn’t keen to wonder might happen should another dodgy pitch present itself in Melbourne — “You can’t play a game before you’re in it” — but he seemed confident that wouldn’t happen: “I don’t think they will prepare a pitch like they did [at the Gabba] because it’s been deemed below average. I think it will be more fair for bat and ball.”

Not that the South Africans are about to consign their batting failures at the Gabba to the pitch. “We must apply ourselves and get focused, make sure we’re present at the crease all the time,” Zondo said. “You need to be really focused on the ball and have all of your soul and mind there.” Giving a better account of themselves at the MCG would mean “having stronger defences, making sure we keep the good balls out. There’s a lot of them in Test cricket. If they can’t get you out you’ve got half-a-chance of scoring runs.”

Zondo is one of eight children fathered by Raymond Zondo, South Africa’s chief justice and among the few beacons of integrity in a society that is running out of reasons to hope the future will be better than a present ruined by inequality and corruption that has been built on a past ruled by the evils of apartheid. Was his father a cricket person?

“I try not speak too much cricket with him or the rest of my family,” Zondo said, another smile on his face. “I’ll just let them know how I’ve done and how things are going. They’ll check up on me here and there. He’s a man of the law and I’m a cricketer. It’s two different things.”

Indeed, but they’re both in search of justice.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Cultures collide when cricketers clash

“What happened was un-Australian. We play hard but fair. Always have, always will.” – an Australian on Sandpapergate.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

TWO days before it became a blaze of light and sound befitting last month’s men’s T20 World Cup final, the MCG sprawled and soared silently into the night. Less than 5km away along the tram route, in a common or garden pub nestled on a corner in Hawthorn, last rounds were called above the rattle of chatter.

Plenty of beer had been soaked up by three young Australian men leaning heavily on one of the pub’s tall tables. They were cricket people but, importantly, not T20 people: “Nah mate. Not that crap.” So a World Cup final happening down the road in the coming days mattered less to them than where their next drink might come from, and not only because Australia weren’t involved. And even if England might be beaten.

What did matter? “Test cricket mate. Boxing Day, we’re there.” This December 26 Australia’s opponents will be South Africa, who haven’t played a Boxing Day Test in Melbourne for 14 years. The series, which starts at the Gabba next Saturday, will mark the first time the teams have clashed in the format since their momentous rubber in South Africa in March 2018.

That drama started with David Warner and Quinton de Kock almost coming to blows in a stairwell at Kingsmead. It spun off kilter at St George’s Park, where spectators degraded Warner’s wife in cowardly fashion. That was also where Kagiso Rabada’s shoulder made what was initially adjudged to have been illegal contact with Steve Smith. The ban that decision triggered was overturned on appeal. At Newlands, Cameron Bancroft, in a plot masterminded by Warner with Smith’s knowledge and acquiescence, was caught applying sandpaper to the ball. Australians, including their then prime minister, took the dimmest view of the latter.

That that should stoke the ire of a certain kind of Aussie the most said more about them than they should want being said. They seemed less disturbed by the behaviour of one of their senior players. And by the shameful treatment of one of their citizens — who was blameless into the bargain — by boors in the bleachers. What swept them into high dudgeon was the exposure of their hagiography for what it was. Their hubris couldn’t stand up to scrutiny.

The shock in Australia that their players could do such a thing — “Ball-tampering?! Us?! But we’re Australians! We don’t do that!” — was met everywhere else by a dearth of surprise: “Ball-tampering? You? Of course: Australians are born cheats.” More than four years on, at least some of those feelings are undiluted, even by a long day’s drinking. Asked what he had made of Sandpapergate, one of the three young Aussies in the pub in Hawthorn said: “I was disgusted. I still am. What happened was un-Australian. We play hard but fair. Always have, always will.” It seemed cruel to disabuse him of the notion, despite the open and shut case to the contrary.

That thread stretched to Brisbane on Monday, when Dean Elgar gave his first press conference of South Africa’s tour. Most of the engagement focused on what one reporter termed “the infamous 2018 series”, perhaps to seek from Elgar an acknowledgement that the Australian response to Sandpapergate was justified. That was not forthcoming. Many South Africans considered the hue and cry a massive over-reaction, and sat back and watched smug with schadenfreude.

Or maybe Monday’s prize was a line from the famously combative Elgar that could be barbed and baited and hooked into a headline ahead of the first Test at the Gabba, which starts next Saturday. Or both. Fair dinkum: that’s what reporters do, whether or not they’re Australian. That, too, was not achieved.

Did the South Africans harbour ill feelings towards the home side? “None at all,” Elgar said. “It was a very tough time for all of us, even though we weren’t the guys who took the brunt of everything. But we were part of that. They were sad events, but I don’t have animosity towards the players involved or CA. They were unfortunate scenes but that period has long elapsed and we’ve moved forward.

“I wish things could have been a lot different. The history, when it comes to Test cricket between South Africa and Australia, is so rich. The competitive nature [between the teams] is very similar. We both want to go out and play a brand of cricket that our countries can be proud of. It was extremely juicy, even building up to that game in Cape Town. They were interesting times.”

What did he want to see this time? “Hopefully there’s no antics going on on the field that anyone gets busted for. But there’s always a bit of spice. We love playing against Australia. We’ve got a heap of respect for Australian cricket.”

Was he peeved at the players who had served their bans and resumed their careers? “Not at all. Smith and Warner are two cricketers I’ve played against for over a decade. There’s definitely no bad blood.”

On Tuesday, at an exclusively South African press conference, Sandpapergate came up again. Once. Malibongwe Maketa, who was South Africa’s assistant coach in 2018 and is now in charge on an interim basis, said: “A handful of us were involved in that series. I know it changed people’s careers but for us, on the other side of the spectrum, it was an unfortunate incident. And, where we are now, it’s way back then.”

Not in Australia, where it’s big news again. On Wednesday Warner abandoned his attempt to have his life ban from serving in leadership positions overturned because the hearings would not be held in private, which would amount to a retrial. “They want to conduct a public spectacle to, in the [independent review] panel’s words, have a ‘cleansing,” Warner wrote in a statement. “I am not prepared for my family to be the washing machine for cricket’s dirty laundry.”

Maybe Australians should listen to Elgar and Maketa, who essentially told them they aren’t special. That they had and would again stoop to the same sillinesses as the rest of us, in sport and everything else. That sometimes they would advance fair, other times not. South Africa, for instance, were done for ball-tampering three times between October 2013 and November 2016.

On each occasion CSA and most of the public defended the players involved — Faf du Plessis, twice, and Vernon Philander. There was no thought of punishing them to a greater degree than the ICC, as CA did to Smith, Warner and Bancroft, or even of castigating them.

Du Plessis’ second infraction happened in Australia, and the resultant storm elicited an amused awe from the South Africans that their hosts could take the issue so seriously. “The media attention and aggression multiplied exponentially,” Du Plessis wrote in Faf: Through Fire. “People attacked my character and my faith.”

There was a suspicion that things might have been different had an Australia player been the target. With the benefit of the hindsight provided by events at Newlands less than two years later, the South Africans’ wry smiles of 2016 would have broken into guffaws of astounded agreement that those supremely sanctimonious Australians really had suspended their disbelief enough to consider their players better than that.

The culture clash doesn’t end there. South Africans are amazed at what looks from afar like Australian cricket’s determination to inflict self-harm. There’s the Warner situation, and there’s Justin Langer commanding one pole of opinion on how things should be done — the old, bloodyminded, get on with it way — and Pat Cummins representing the other — the new, empathetic, be part of the modern world way. In South Africa, bitter and twisted former players and coaches disappear into putrid but petty puddles on social media. In Australia they become powerful media figures, as Langer has.

At a presser with the South African media on Thursday, Rassie van der Dussen admitted to surprise at Australian cricket’s apparent enthusiasm for undoing itself. He also offered what could be considered a cynical thought: “I see there’s a season two of ‘The Test’ being released, so maybe there’s a bit of that involved. Controversy sells and people want to stay relevant. Actions speak louder than words, and there’s a lot of words going around.” The documentary will hit screens in January, and will deal with Cummins becoming captain and the messy end of Langer’s tenure as coach. 

Not that the game in South Africa is free of internecine damage, as was painfully made clear last year by CSA’s Social Justice and Nation-Building project. If anything, agendas compete more fiercely in the country than anywhere else in the cricket world. Every facet of South Africa’s society is afflicted by racism and racially based economic and social inequality, and that despite apartheid ending in 1994. Conflicts over race are never far from erupting regardless of the issue ostensibly at hand.

Because Mark Boucher was among a slew of whites appointed to powerful positions in December 2009, when several black and brown figures were swept aside, he was dogged by criticism throughout his tenure as coach. When South Africa lost, it was his fault. When they won, he was denied the credit. Boucher’s voluntary departure with a middling record after the T20 World Cup led to Maketa being installed in, at this stage, a temporary capacity.

Elgar has made plain that he pushed for Maketa’s elevation, and was satisfied to have “got that right”. When Graeme Smith, as CSA’s then director of cricket, appointed Boucher, he was slammed for favouring a friend. How was Elgar’s support for Maketa different? “Due to the short-term nature of this appointment, it was important for the director of cricket to get the input of the captain,” Pholetsi Moseki, CSA’s chief executive, told Cricbuzz. “So I don’t think it’s the same as the Graeme Smith-Mark Boucher situation as that was a permanent appointment.” 

That’s the right answer for now. But if Maketa, a highly qualified and popular coach, lands the job permanently would he also have to endure mindless hate? Probably not, because the circumstances are beyond the blunt binary narratives that divide and damage debate in South Africa depressingly often. Elgar is white and Maketa black, and that means the usual poisonous nonsense would have nowhere to grow.

Australians who struggle to understand that should know South Africans can’t make sense of Cummins raising concerns about a major sponsor, Alinta Energy. They know fossil fuel industries have a disastrous impact on the planet, and that Cummins is a vocal advocate for action on the climate crisis. They also know CA have said the Test captain’s views aren’t why the company will part ways with cricket when their current agreement expires at the end of next year. What’s difficult for South Africans to fathom is that this could happen to a sponsorship reportedly worth AUS$40-million — the equivalent of almost two-and-a-half times the loss CSA declared at their annual meeting on November 26.

The space where Alinta’s logo sits on Australia’s playing shirts has been blank on South Africa’s kit since December 2019, when sponsors deserted CSA as push came to shove for a delinquent board. The suits who replaced that sorry bunch have exponentially more credibility and real world expertise and experience, but serious corporate backing has not returned for reasons ranging from what Covid did to South Africa’s already failing economy, to a perceived lack of confidence in CSA’s rehabilitation. So any player in South Africa who objected to the kind of money Alinta is pumping into the game in Australia would likely be told, by his teammates, administrators and the cricketminded public, to shut up and sit down regardless of what the company doing the pumping was selling.

In 2004, when Hashim Amla refused to wear, on religious grounds, logos advertising alcohol on his playing kit, his choice was accepted by many South Africans not of his faith. Given how impoverished the game in South Africa has become in the ensuing 18 years, if Amla had to make the same decision today it might be significantly less well received. Comparatively affluent Australian cricket wouldn’t have to confront that scenario.

Series between Australia and South Africa are said to produce compelling cricket because the cultures of cricket in their countries are similar, as Elgar argued. Closer to the truth is that differences between those cultures, and in the wider realities in which they exist, fuel fires on the field. The similarities are limited to superficial echoes. Or a means to an end, as Du Plessis wrote, “I realised early on that the only way to win against [Australia] was to match their aggression in order to neutralise their attempts at bullying you into submission.”

Doubtless the fires will burn again in the coming weeks, and with an intensity that startles neutrals. How high will the flames climb this time? 

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Prepare for drama Down Under

“For us, mentally, it’s about cricket – what is required for us to come here and win.” – Malibongwe Maketa hopes the focus stays on the field in Australia.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

“WE know what you did last month,” South Africa’s players can be sure of hearing, laced with appropriate profanities, from their opponents during the Test series that starts at the Gabba next Saturday.

Six members of South Africa’s current squad were party to the unthinkable in Adelaide 31 days ago, when they were in the XI who lost to the Netherlands and consequently crashed out of the men’s T20 World Cup. Two more who were in that mournful dressing room, as travelling reserves, are back in Australia.

How will Malibongwe Maketa, the visitors’ interim coach, make Temba Bavuma, Marco Jansen, Heinrich Klaasen, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Anrich Nortjé, Kagiso Rabada and Lizaad Williams concentrate on what lies ahead rather than what is in the still raw, recent past? Especially when they have the Australians in their ear doing the opposite?

“It’s totally different formats and we have made sure that, mentally and physically, the guys have had a longer break,” Maketa told reporters from Brisbane on Tuesday, a reference to Bavuma and Rabada not playing domestic cricket before the tour. “Now that we’re here the focus is on how we are going to go about winning this series.

“The players who were here during the World Cup have contributed in terms of [discussing] the conditions, albeit that they were T20 conditions. We have been challenging them to make sure they are putting their energy into the team, which is what they’ve done. Test cricket brings different pressures and the mental switch has definitely happened, and earlier than we expected. The energy that we’ve received from them has been positive.”

New as Maketa is in his position — he was appointed on November 2 having served as Ottis Gibson’s assistant from August 2017 until July 2019 — he will know that a Test series in Australia is about more than cricket. In November 2012 it was about a dossier the Australians allegedly had compiled on their opponents that, on cursory inspection, read more like lightly edited sections of Mickey Arthur’s autobiography than anything revelatory or insightful. Four years later it was about the intimate relationship between Faf du Plessis, the mints in his mouth, and the ball. 

The off-field stakes have been raised incrementally since South Africa completed their first ever Test series victory in Australia in January 2009, no doubt because they have followed that success with two more. It’s not that the Australian press favours the home side, who are invariably held to a far higher standard than opponents — as was proved again during the 2018 ball-tampering scandal. Rather, a highly competent and competent media don’t hold back. Deference is a dirty word. Every angle is explored and exploited to the full, and to a degree not often reached in South Africa.

Good luck trying to dissuade Australian reporters from writing about a change being forced in the batting order after Kyle Verreynne’s grandfather suffered a heart attack in the stands — as South Africa’s team management tried to do, unsuccessfully, when that happened during the Lord’s Test in August. Similarly, Dean Elgar’s assertion last week that the recalled Theunis de Bruyn had “gone through a lot of personal things which I’ll never speak of” is sure to be revisited in Australia if De Bruyn is picked, and particularly if he does well. How might Maketa manage that challenge?

“It’s difficult, but our experience tells us each series has had its own hiccups. For us, mentally, it’s about cricket — what is required for us to come here and win. That’s been the driving force. We’ve got enough personnel and support to make sure we deal with whatever situation we might encounter.”

For now, Maketa appears intent on forging the important bond with Elgar: “Our relationship is strong and based on hard work. We’re similar in what we’re looking for in terms of the team and the performance. Like I said to the guys when I joined the team, I’m here to support Dean in every way to make sure that he not only gets what he wants but that he gets the guys onside in terms of performances.”

Maketa attained his level four certificate — the highest qualification in the field in South Africa — since September 2015, and would seem to have a firm grip on his boundaries as a coach: “The only way I can affect the game is through preparation; I know the guys are not liking me at the moment in the sense that we’ve had some really hard [training] sessions. Once the game starts I hand over and the biggest thing then is how do we support the players as a coaching staff. And consistently asking ourselves questions on how we can turn the game around or how we can stay ahead in the game, and giving that information to the players and to Dean to make sure we support them.

“I’m more relaxed when the game starts. I know I’ll be comfortable that we’ve done all the work and everything that’s required for us to go out there and perform. Everything else is down to the players. As a coaching staff, I encourage us not to get in the way of the players but to trust the work that they’ve done and make sure the environment is conducive for them to perform.”

Maketa spoke the day after England had found ways to win in Rawalpindi on a pitch that was the antithesis of the swinging and seaming conditions that helped them claim victory in six of the seven Tests they played at home this year. England beat Pakistan, by 74 runs, on Monday despite the match yielding an aggregate of 1,768 runs, the third most in Test history and the most since 1939. Under coach Brendon McCullum and captain Ben Stokes, the English could be said to be revolutionising the oldest format of the game. Might South Africa try to emulate them?

“There’s different takes to getting people to the ground,” Maketa said. “We know if you start winning people will come. The Australia of old made their goal scoring around four [runs an over] to make sure they were getting people to the ground, and they were still winning. It was a win-win for them.

“For us, it’s about going out there and winning. We know that, back home, people will support winning teams regardless of what happens. That’s how we’re looking to set out our stall. We want to play good, attractive cricket; brave cricket. But Test cricket is meant to be played for five days. If it means we win in the last session on the fifth day, we’ll take that.”

Maketa should prepare to be reminded that England’s Bazballers did indeed show the patience to win in the last session of the fifth day, and to be asked if he is driving his players too hard — shortly after he spoke, team management said Wednesday’s planned training session had been cancelled. Welcome to Australia, coach.

Cricbuzz

Evolving Elgar: more like Du Plessis, less like Warner

“Maybe a year ago it wasn’t as okay as it is now.” – Dean Elgar on what we don’t see about his captaincy.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

FAF du Plessis looked, as usual, as if he had stepped out of the pages of a magazine. In fact he had emerged from Kingsmead’s dressing room to see what all the fuss was about clad in nothing but a towel. Had Dean Elgar been South Africa’s captain, he might have rushed out stark raving naked brandishing a bat in one hand, swinging a stump in the other and not bothering to ask questions.

Du Plessis’ calm presence in that doorway remains an enduring image from the first of too many unseemly episodes on Australia’s tour of South Africa in March 2018, the last time the teams met in a Test series.

David Warner, aided and abetted by fielding close to the bat, had spent much of the second session of the fourth day of that match, the first of the rubber, verbally abusing Quinton de Kock, who was batting. Warner kept spewing nastiness when the players left the field for tea, and as they were making their way up the stairs De Kock retaliated by making a disgraceful comment involving Warner’s wife. The already ugly Aussie exploded with loud, foul-mouthed rage and had to be physically retrained, which emptied the dressing rooms. We know this because the scene was captured, in all its ingloriousness, on the security cameras. 

Elgar, who was in that South Africa XI, would not become captain until March 2021. And a good thing, too, probably. Du Plessis is measured, diplomatic, and mindful of cause and effect. The Elgar of March 2018 was a shoot first, refuse to apologise later kind of guy. Happily, South Africa will be led in the Test series that starts at the Gabba on December 17 by a figure who has developed into someone more like Du Plessis even as he has become less like Warner.

“Ten years ago I might not have had the skills to deal with it,” Elgar told reporters in Johannesburg on Thursday about shouldering the burdens of leadership. “Being 35, I’ve taught myself how to do things and when to focus on things. As a player I’m here to score runs; I’m here to win innings for our team. But I’ve also got a greater responsibility. That’s off-the-field stuff that people don’t see. It’s actually been okay. Maybe a year ago it wasn’t as okay as it is now.

“Some things you don’t have to waste your energy on. Putting energy into the important things is important. I don’t sweat the small things because I think you waste a lot of energy when you do that. When it comes to my players I use a lot of energy. Every player has their own pressures and being captain you have a few extra responsibilities.”

Another indication of the progress Elgar has made at a human level is the care he showed when he spoke of his vice-captain, Temba Bavuma, who will have to put behind him captaining South Africa to their most infamous loss yet in their T20 World Cup match against the Netherlands in Adelaide last month: “What we’ve discussed between us is personal. I respect what he’s been through, but I can’t speak for what he has been through because I wouldn’t know how to deal with it personally. So, for now, I’m respecting the space he is in.”

Elgar goes to Australia having scored a century and a half-century in four innings in South Africa’s domestic first-class competition. Bavuma, a nuggety Test batter, hasn’t played since the Adelaide awfulness on November 6.

“I think the time off has done him good,” Elgar said. “He wanted to have a break from the game and you’ve got to respect that as well. He’s got a lot of pressure on his plate. But we’ve got to go to work again soon and he’s got to be in the right space for the team. That’s going to be the message I put forward to him. I’m pretty sure he’ll respond well. It’s up to me to get him into the right space so we give him the best opportunity to go out and play his brand of Test cricket.”

Elgar’s evolution is far from the only major change in South African and Australian cricket in the past three and more years. Warner, Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft ended the 2018 series in disgrace for their central roles in the Sandpapergate ball-tampering scandal, but have all returned to the fold. Warner’s reputation has been laundered to the extent that his life ban from leadership positions in Australia’s teams is being openly and widely contested by people who didn’t raise a peep of protest when it was imposed.

De Kock, Du Plessis’ successor as captain, led in four Tests, eight ODIs and 11 T20Is before he was sacked — only nine of those games were won — and replaced by Elgar and Bavuma, in the white-ball formats, in March 2021. De Kock retired from Tests that December. Du Plessis played his last Test in Rawalpindi in February 2021 but was expected to re-appear for the T20 World Cup. He didn’t.

Ottis Gibson, South Africa’s coach in 2018, was fired after his team’s dismal 2019 ODI World Cup and replaced, in an interim capacity, by Enoch Nkwe and, permanently that December, by Mark Boucher — who resigned after the T20 World Cup with a year left on his contract. Another interim coach, Malibongwe Maketa, who served as Gibson’s assistant, will take South Africa to Australia. Elgar would seem to have had something to that happening: “‘Mali’ is one of the coaches I asked our director [of cricket] to try and get in to be interim. I got that right. He understands his role, which is going to be a supportive role. He understands me as a cricketer, as a person and as a leader.” Nkwe, who served as Boucher’s assistant coach from December 2019 to August 2021, when he resigned citing, in part, difficulties working with Boucher, is now CSA’s director of cricket.   

Tim Paine found himself lumped with the Australia Test captaincy before the end of the 2018 rubber, only to be undone by a sexting scandal in November 2021. He has been succeeded by Pat Cummins. Darren Lehmann quit as Australia’s coach in the wake of Sandpapergate and was followed into that position by Justin Langer, who resigned in February this year and is now taking cheap shots at Cummins.

The whirl of these twin revolutions is enough to make anyone’s head spin. But Elgar’s is on firmly enough to keep a steady eye on the challenges of playing a series in Australia. Particularly when the visitors are South Africa. Or is it that not everything about Elgar has changed?

“The nature of individuals in their squad is pretty brash and bold, in-your-face kind of characters,” he said. “I think that plays into our hands. I think we enjoy confrontation as a group and we manage it pretty well. We’ve got calm heads around that. If they want to be in-your-face, it’s fine. I definitely don’t shy away from that and I will be encouraging the players not to shy away because I think that’s when South Africans bring out their best character.”

South Africa won the 2018 series but have since prevailed in only five, while losing seven, of their 13 rubbers in the format. Australia had played 11 Test series before their current home engagement against West Indies, winning five and losing four.

But not since 2008 have South Africa been in Australia to play the Boxing Day and New Year Tests. “Growing up as a kid, you always wake up for these Boxing Day Test matches Down Under and you don’t mind losing a few hours sleep,” Elgar said. “Now we’ve got 16 players who are going to experience it first-hand. It’s a childhood dream. I don’t think it gets bigger than this.

“But you can’t let events overwhelm your thinking. That’s going to be the message I am going to be driving. We are still there to do a job. You need to respect where you are and take in the moments in your own personal way, but we are playing a Test match for South Africa and we need to back our processes as long and as hard as we can to give us a favourable result.”

South Africa’s victory in 2008 was their first series win in Australia after five defeats and three draws since 1910. They have since won two consecutive rubbers there. Australia finished on top in the first five series they played in South Africa, starting in 1902. The South Africans won the next two, the last of them the final series the team from the then apartheid state contested until 1992 because of isolation. It took another eight rubbers between the sides in South Africa, two of them drawn, before the home side won the 2018 epic.

Australia versus South Africa, or South Africa versus Australia, invariably bristles with a mutual contempt born of a certain familiarity of national characters. That cannot change, however much the game changes in these countries.

So come on in. The water will be as hot this time as it has been every other time. Don’t forget your towel.

Cricbuzz

White or not, McKenzie back on board at CSA

“It’s an exciting coaching group I’m going to be part of – looking after the under-19s all the way through to the Proteas.” – Neil McKenzie, CSA’s new batting guru

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

WILL the real CSA please stand up? Last week they gave South Africa’s government a commitment that they would appoint only black and brown consultants unless none were available. This week they appointed two whites in prominent positions.

Dillon du Preez was named as assistant coach of South Africa’s women’s team on Tuesday. On Thursday, Neil McKenzie was unveiled as the “high performance batting lead”. The devil, of course, is in the details: neither has signed on as a consultant. They are permanent staff.

But that will do little to placate those who have charged the cricket establishment with systemic racism going back decades. Not least Nathi Mthethwa, the minister of sport, who has complained that the upper echelons of the game are too white. Do CSA intend to get around the promise they made to him, at a meeting last Monday, about the colour of their consultants by simply not describing their appointees as consultants?      

In the super-heated atmosphere cricket has stumbled into, that Du Preez and McKenzie are solidly qualified for their new roles and, particularly in McKenzie’s case, have the track records to prove their competence matters less than the fact that they are neither black nor brown. And thus it also matters whether their jobs could have been given to those of similar stature and abilities who are black or brown. Geoff Toyana, for instance. Or Ashwell Prince.

Two blacks and four brown people were also appointed on Thursday. Eddie Khoza, whose excellence as an administrator has helped him rise above the febrile polarisation in the game, continues as CSA’s “acting head of cricket pathways”. Malibongwe Maketa returns from the exile he seemed to be cast into after last year’s disastrous World Cup, where he was Ottis Gibson’s assistant, as “South Africa A and national academy lead”. Shukri Conrad, a veteran of the coaching circuit, is the “South Africa under-19 men’s lead”. The respected and experienced Vincent Barnes, a former South Africa bowling and assistant coach, is the “high performance manager and bowling lead”. Dinesha Devnarain, who played 51 white-ball internationals, carries on as the South Africa under-19 women’s team and women’s national academy head coach. CSA’s chief medical officer will still be Shuaib Manjra, who doesn’t seem to have put a foot wrong.

But it’s McKenzie’s name that sticks out. He was named South Africa’s batting coach in February 2016 and replaced by Dale Benkenstein in October 2017, when Gibson succeeded Russell Domingo. It’s difficult to judge coaches, especially those who work in the technical disciplines. But it’s a fact that South Africa’s batters averaged 37.54, regardless of format, under McKenzie. Since he has left they have averaged 28.96.

South Africans’ most recent memory of him will be in a World Cup match at the Oval on June 2 last year, when he helped engineer Bangladesh’s victory over his compatriots. The 330/6 McKenzie’s charges scored was then their record ODI total and they topped 300 twice more during the tournament.

“I’ve come back a little more rounded as a coach,” McKenzie said in an audio file released by CSA on Thursday of his stint of more than two years in Bangladesh’s dugout. “It was a good experience but it’s really nice to be back with South Africa and trying to make a really good contribution.”

What were the parameters of his role? “It’s an exciting coaching group I’m going to be part of — looking after the under-19s all the way through to the Proteas,” McKenzie said. “I’ll be generally looking after the batting. It’s a young batting unit when you look across all the formats and spheres in the men’s and women’s [teams].”

In effect, then, McKenzie will serve as South Africa’s batting coach. Or consultant. Or “lead”, whatever that means. That would also seem to indicate there is no vacancy for a dedicated batting coach or consultant for the national team.

McKenzie was a good bet to return to South Africa’s dressingroom since he said on August 21 that he had resigned as Bangladesh’s batting coach. The current politics of cricket in South Africa threatened to throw a spanner in the works, but CSA have found a way to secure his services.

Graeme Smith, CSA’s director of cricket, will doubtless come under fire for what some will refuse to see as nothing other than another instance of him handing out jobs for pals: he played in 50 of McKenzie’s 124 matches for South Africa and captained him 38 times. Smith has faced the same claim over his appointment of Mark Boucher as head coach and Jacques Kallis, who served as the batting consultant last season. Smith played 258 international matches with Boucher and 261 with Kallis.

Perhaps Smith saw the accusation coming. In a video file of more than six minutes he extolled the virtues of Maketa, Conrad and Khoza, and even a position that has yet to be filled — that of convenor of selectors — but did not mention McKenzie.

“The convenor of selectors is a key person in CSA,” Smith said. “It’s a job that comes with a lot of pressure from all fronts. We went about advertising the job. Our HR department collects all the applications and we move from there into interview processes. With the cricket committee and the board members [involved] we decide on the best candidate going forward.

“The role definition is slightly changed. We’ve shifted it to not only being a national team convenor, but to controlling the whole pipeline, which speaks to our high performance strategy. We feel it’s important to create the avenues of communication — the way we play, select, think, operate, the type of people we want involved in that environment is key. We’ve aligned the convenor of selectors right through the pipeline. He’ll be overseeing everything. The convenor now is a much more extensive job.

“One thing I noticed when I got involved with CSA in December is that there were decent people involved but there wasn’t really that cross-communication. What was happening at under-19 level was separate to what was happening at the national academy, was separate to what was happening with the A team and then the national side. The thinking was not going right through the pipeline. The convenor of selectors working on the whole system and owning the whole system, and being part of all the processes, is key.

“That strategy is now in place, and we will sit down as a group and debate and work on our way forward, and try and align as closely to the national teams as we can in terms of culture, performance and what’s needed to hopefully push us to a level where our national teams are the best in the world. That they’re winning World Cups, that we’re bringing talent through, [that] we’re transforming at a level that is acceptable to everybody. Those are the goals with these appointments; that we can become really efficient and that cricket can push forward and create the strength that is required of us.”  

Listening to Smith, you could fool yourself that CSA is a functional organisation bound for great things. But then you remember why someone as highly regarded, deservedly, as Khoza is marooned in an acting capacity. His permanent position is senior cricket manager, which is being filled temporarily by David Mokopanele, in real life CSA’s mass participation manager. Khoza has been bumped up because Corrie van Zyl, previously the head of cricket pathways, has returned as an executive consultant in the wake of winning his case after being suspended in October, along with former chief operating officer Naasei Appiah and former sponsorship and sales head Clive Eksteen. Former chief executive Thabang Moroe was central to the drama. Appiah, Eksteen and Moroe have all since been fired. And all are taking legal action.

Can there be any surprise that many South Africans want to get as far way from cricket as they can? Even South Africans like Jonty Rhodes, who has been confirmed as Sweden’s new head coach. Yes, Sweden.

“The sad thing for me is that even though the top 30 players in the country want to work together for the game, the administration is in such chaos that unfortunately it does have an impact on things [on the field],” Rhodes was quoted as saying on Wednesday in a PTI report from Dubai, where he is Kings XI Punjab’s fielding coach for the IPL starting on September 19.

“Someone like me who is not part of the system, we are reading about issues in South African cricket week in and week out and they have not been resolved. The same mistakes are being made and there is not much accountability. It saddens me … it does impact on-field performance. Even though we have some great players, we have been lacking consistency in performance because of inconsistency off the field.” 

That’s the real CSA. Right there. It will have to work harder than ever to stand up.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Domingo to head up Bangladesh’s burgeoning boerewors brigade

“There are many names of coaches that spring to mind including Duncan Fletcher, Graham Ford, Mickey Arthur and Adrian Birrell.” – Corrie van Zyl lists some of the coaches lost to the game in South Africa. 

TELFORD VICE in London

BANGLADESH’S burgeoning boerewors brigade gained another member on Saturday when Russell Domingo was appointed head coach of the improving Asians’ men’s team.

Many will see his success as another nail hammered into the coffin of an ailing game in South Africa.  

Domingo, a former South Africa assistant and head coach who is currently in charge of the A side, will join fellow South Africans Neil McKenzie and Charl Langeveldt — Bangladesh’s batting and bowling coaches — in Dhaka.

All three were in South Africa’s dressingroom during Domingo’s tenure as head coach, which ran from 2013 to 2017.

“We have been very impressed with his passion and coaching philosophy,” Bangladesh Cricket Board president Nazmul Hassan was quoted as saying in a release.

“He has a clear idea of what is required to take the team forward.”

South Africa and Bangladesh had identical records at this year’s World Cup: three wins from eight completed games.

But the Bangladeshis’ successes — over South Africa, West Indies and Afghanistan — were signs of the gathering strength of their team, and the good work done by McKenzie and Langeveldt, who were both spurned by South Africa and have since had their Bangladesh contracts extended.

Indeed, the South Africans’ loss to Bangladesh, which followed their defeat by England and preceded being beaten by India, was the most crushing blow of a failed campaign that has prompted a rash of panicky restructuring by Cricket South Africa (CSA).

“I have followed Bangladesh’s progress with keen interest and I am extremely excited to assist the team in reaching the goals that they are capable of,” the release quoted Domingo as saying.

“I look forward to continuing the ongoing development of current players whilst also looking towards the future and developing some new bright stars from within the talent pool of Bangladesh cricket.”

In a CSA release, acting director of cricket Corrie van Zyl tried to put a positive spin on the news: “Russell has kept us in the loop throughout this process and, although we are sorry to lose his services, we wish him well and know that he will be yet another one of the coaches who have come successfully through our development system to coach at provincial or franchise level and end up at the very top.

“There are many names of coaches that spring to mind including Duncan Fletcher, Graham Ford, Mickey Arthur and Adrian Birrell.

“Gary Kirsten’s first significant coaching position was as batting consultant to the Warriors when Russell was in charge there and he has gone on to be a World Cup winner.”

Van Zyl neglected to mention that Kirsten didn’t win the World Cup with South Africa — he guided India to triumph in 2011 — and that none of the other coaches he named are still significantly involved in the game in the country.

New Zealander Daniel Vettori is the spin bowling expert in a Bangladesh coaching staff that, for their first trick, will take charge of a one-off Test against Afghanistan in Chattogram that starts on September 5.

Malibongwe Maketa, freshly fired as South Africa’s assistant coach in the wake the World Cup, is now the A team’s interim coach while Cobras coach Ashwell Prince will take Domingo’s place for a spin camp in Bangalore from August 17 to 23.

First published by TMG Digital.

Leading Edge: Farewell Amla and Steyn – we may never see their like again

Had Dale Steyn and Hashim Amla cut their teeth in the gathering nonsense that is South African cricket now, they might never have bothered to keep at it.

The Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in London

FIRST, last Monday, Dale Steyn. Then, on Thursday, Hashim Amla. Who else might have retired between you picking up the paper and reaching this page?

Steyn takes with him the snap, crackle and pop of the fast bowler’s fast bowler, who also managed to stay as real as he was when he arrived all those years, many hairstyles and many more wickets ago.

Amla was, is and always will be the epitome of calm and class, and all good human things. The least important aspect of his contribution to the game was the runs he scored, and they were important enough.

Players of the stature of Steyn and Amla cross the line between us and them. We don’t know them but we think we do. So when they no longer want to be part of our world, or that part of our world we want them to stay in, we feel something like betrayed. 

If you’re in shock, that’s to be expected — and it should feel familiar.

There was alarm on a grey day in Taunton in July 2012, when heads bobbed up at the sound of Imran Tahir cleanbowling Gemaal Hussain to see a stunned Mark Boucher on all fours on the last outfield he would grace as a player.

And on a sweaty Christmas Day in Durban in 2013, when Jacques Kallis gave away the gift of playing test cricket.

And deep in the dark hours after stumps on the third day of third test against Australia at Newlands in March 2014, when Graeme Smith went ungently into that not so good night.

And in May last year, on an otherwise ordinary Wednesday, when AB de Villiers decided he had been there, done that and got all the international caps he wanted.

So, feel it. The shock is here. Again. But this time there’s also something else; an ominousness, a feeling that the end of the game as we have come to know it in South Africa is near. And not in a good way.

Plenty about cricket needs to change. It is too white and too wedded to affluence, and its major venues are too far removed, geographically, culturally and economically, from where most South Africans live. But, if cricket hopes to retain its credibility, it cannot change in the way it did last week.

How do Cricket South Africa (CSA) expect to avoid suspicion over their motivations for their radically retrogressive restructure, which with its shortsighted concentration of power in chief executive Thabang Moroe’s hands harks back to times when nothing moved without Charles Fortune’s, Hassan Howa’s or Ali Bacher’s say-so?

Shouldn’t an organisation that is, in clinically measurable financial terms, failing miserably concentrate on stopping the bleeding by, say, killing off the haemorrhaging horror that is the Mzansi Super League?          

How do they justify setting up a highly promising coach like Enoch Nkwe up for a significant setback by sending him on a hiding to nothing in India when they have more experienced, widely respected and equally black coaches like Geoff Toyana and Malibongwe Maketa to call on, assuming they want the job?  

Why aren’t they telling us what they are doing to try and stop Faf du Plessis, Dean Elgar and Vernon Philander from following Steyn and Amla out of this circus and back to reality?

Do CSA not see that they are handing the reactionaries, of which there are always too many, ammunition by behaving like this? Or do they no longer give a damn?

So let us give thanks that Steyn and Amla, who are both 36, came to cricket when they did; when it was still a profession with a future in South Africa.

Had they cut their teeth in the gathering nonsense that is South African cricket now, they might never have bothered to keep at it. If you had the talent and the commitment to crack it at the highest level, why would you trust people who seem to have only their own interests at heart with your livelihood?

Steyn was the best fast bowler in the world for much of his career, a player who grew a foot taller merely by standing on his mark. Amla was the finest batter anyone could send to the crease in any format, against any opponents, and in any conditions.

They didn’t become those players by accident, and they didn’t do so on their own. People had to believe in them, and they had to believe in people.

Who believes in CSA now? How? Why?

Gibson gone, Du Plessis doubted, authority aggregated as CSA hit panic button

“I must stress that the new structure was not a rash decision.” – CSA chief executive Thabang Moroe

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in London

CRICKET South Africa (CSA) would seem to have hit the panic button in reaction to their men’s team’s poor performance at the World Cup.

Ottis Gibson is no longer the coach, the status of Faf du Plessis, the all-format captain, appears to be in question, and much of the currently separated authority in and around the side will be fused into one position — a czar of sorts. 

“I would like to thank Ottis Gibson, other members of the team’s current senior management, and our long-serving team manager, Dr. Moosajee, for their national service to South African cricket,” chief executive Thabang Moroe was quoted as saying in the last paragraph of a release on Sunday.

The conclusion of Mohammed Moosajee’s 16 years as South Africa’s doctor and manager has for weeks been a fait accompli. 

His “tenure comes to an end in September”, the release said.

The departure of Gibson, who presided over five losses in the eight completed games South Africa played at the World Cup, was confirmed by a CSA spokesperson on Sunday.

Later on Sunday on social media, Du Plessis offered Gibson empathy: “@MrODGibson gonna miss you coach. Have spent a lot of time together over the last 18 months and you become a friend of mine. You are a great man. Thank you for everything that you have done. We appreciate you.”

Gibson’s coaching crew — assistant Malibongwe Maketa, batting coach Dale Benkenstein, spin consultant Claude Henderson, and fielding coach Justin Ontong — have also lost their jobs.

“Members of team management, including the various assistant cricket coaches, will not be retained as part of the forthcoming plan,” the release said.

“In relation to the imminent tour of India, the chief executive and the acting director of cricket will appoint an interim management team, selection panel and captain for this assignment.

“In the meantime, CSA will advertise the positions of director of cricket, team manager and convenor of selectors.”

Linda Zondi is in the latter role, but has reached the end of his term. He could stay on in a new permanent capacity in what has hitherto been a part-time appointment.   

The release detailed a “dynamic new structure that will … see the appointment of a team manager who will take overall charge of all aspects of the team”.

The manager “will appoint his coaching staff as well as the captain(s)” and the “coaches, the medical staff and the administrative staff will all report directly to him”.

As of now, the closest CSA have to someone in that job is Corrie van Zyl — their manager of cricket pathways — who will serve as director of cricket in an acting capacity until a permanent appointment is made.

“This effectively means that all cricketing decisions within the system will be managed by the acting director of cricket.

That position is, however, separate from the czar’s.

“In terms of the new structure the team manager, similar to football-style structures, will report to the (acting) director of cricket who will in turn report to the chief executive.”

The radical sweep of the overhaul was played down in quotes attributed to Moroe: “This change will herald an exciting new era for the SA cricket and will bring us into line with best practice in professional sport.

“I must stress that the new structure was not a rash decision. It was taken after much deliberation by the board, taking all the factors into consideration about the current state of our cricket and also the plan that we need to get to within the timelines we have set.”

CSA have called a press conference in Johannesburg on Tuesday.

What will South African cricket look like after the World Cup?

“Judge it on me. I’ve done OK in the last few games I’ve played for South Africa.” – Rassie van der Dussen on the state of domestic cricket in South Africa

Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in Cardiff

IT’S quite a list. Ottis Gibson, Faf du Plessis, Dale Steyn, Hashim Amla, Imran Tahir, JP Duminy, Mohammed Moosajee. And Linda Zondi.

South Africa’s convenor of selectors doesn’t hit the headlines as hard as the rest of those who could bid South African cricket farewell after the World Cup. He should.

Another list — of the 19 players who have made one-day debuts on Zondi’s watch — starts with Kagiso Rabada and ends with Anrich Nortjé.

Dud picks? One or two. But for every Christiaan Jonker there’s an Andile Phehlukwayo and a Rassie van der Dussen — who has done a better job of filling AB de Villiers’ size 360 shoes than many would have.

“The AB de Villiers issue gave opportunity to guys like Rassie van der Dussen,” Zondi said. “When you look at him, from where he was to where he is, he’s done well.”

Players like Van der Dussen, a splendid splinter who answers questions as hard as he hits the ball, makes South Africa’s future after the World Cup look brighter.

He is his own best evidence for his argument that the routinely derided domestic system remains fit for the purpose of producing players for the international stage: “Judge it on me. I’ve done OK in the last few games I’ve played for South Africa.

“When teams lose people look for reasons why, and I don’t think that’s the place to look.

“We’ve got a very strong domestic set-up. We’ve got some really good players in South Africa, and it doesn’t matter if a guy hasn’t played international cricket.

“The nature of South Africans and sport in South Africa is that it’s very competitive. You’ve got to sink or swim to survive in that environment.

“I think it still produces really good players.” 

If only the challenge started and ended there. Gibson is, infamously, out if there if he doesn’t win the World Cup. Who might succeed him is an unanswerable question. His assistant, Malibongwe Maketa, has been all but invisible except on the training ground.

Moosajee will be out of contract after the tournament. He has been South Africa’s manager since 2008 and their doctor since 2003. He is the most senior member of the dressingroom, and is looked to for guidance on matters way beyond his remit.

Zondi said he was “done after the World Cup”, but was “definitely interested” about staying in the role if, as Cricket South Africa (CSA) have mooted, it becomes a permanent appointment: “I’m not sure about this fulltime position; if it comes, then it comes.”

Even so he was “already dealing with” the tour to India in September and October.

Of the 15 currently at the World Cup, Amla, Duminy and Tahir are over 35, with Du Plessis, Chris Morris, Dwaine Pretorius and Van der Dussen all past 30.

Was Zondi concerned about what the end of several senior careers could do to the fabric of South Africa’s team?

“I’m not in a position to be worried because I’m always going to have to work with what I have,” Zondi said. “I’m not going to be worried about something I don’t have. I have to look at the players I have.”

He won’t have Duminy, who has heralded his retirement after the tournament, while Tahir will be available only for T20s in future. Steyn and Amla have made no announcement, but few would be surprised if they went.

As for Du Plessis, the shock of how his team are performing at this World Cup surely won’t do much for his desire to keep doing the job. Neither will the thought that for his next trick he will have to guide an already battered team through a potentially shattering tour of India.

The buck stops with CSA, whose chief executive, Thabang Moroe, said: “Just like the rest of the country we are disappointed with the [World Cup] results, but certainly not the effort that has been shown by the players.

“We are still hopeful that the boys will turn it around and represent us well.”

How might CSA try and return to, or even raise, the standards set by South Africa’s previous teams — especially with a talent, skills and experience drain looming?

“At present we are not thinking about any of our players retiring. None of the experienced campaigners have indicated to us that they’ll step down after the showpiece.

“However, should that happen, we are very confident in our structures that they will continue to produce the calibre of players that are worthy and deserve to don Proteas colours.” 

Those are the kinds if things we expect administrators to say. It’s what they do that matters. And the current lot are the subject of legal action mounted by their only asset: the players.

The South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA) are alarmed enough about a plan to turn the six franchises into a dozen provinces to turn their lawyers loose.

Might that explain some of South Africa’s performance at the World Cup? “The team has been in a bubble during preparations and during the event away from those issues,” a source close to that process said.

But it’s out there and it’s real. Just like retirements and personnel changes confirmed and hinted at, and financial losses of up to R654-million.

Where does cricket go from there?