Better batting boosts South Africa against plucky but tone deaf US

“It’s nice to get a decent pitch finally.” – Quinton de Kock

Telford Vice / Cape Town

SOUTH Africa emerged from the batting gloom that hasn’t helped them stay unbeaten for five matches in this edition of the men’s T20 World Cup, their longest winning streak in the history of the tournament, to overcome a plucky United States in North Sound on Wednesday.

Quinton de Kock’s 40-ball 74 was his first effort of 50 or more in nine T20I innings, and followed four trips to the crease in which he had scraped together 48. Challenging batting conditions in those first four games was part of the reason for his lean run. As he told a television interviewer after the match: “It’s nice to get a decent pitch finally.”

De Kock and Aiden Markram shared 110 off 60, South Africa’s only century stand in the 19 T20Is they have played since October 2022. Midway through the 12th over they had already surpassed their previous best total in this tournament. They settled on 194/4 — the highest score made in the 18 men’s T20Is played at North Sound, the joint fifth-highest of the T20I World Cup, and South Africa’s biggest in seven games in the format. Only 19 times in the 101 T20Is in which they have batted first have they scored more runs.

But the success was not unqualified. De Kock’s dismissal in the 13th was followed by David Miller’s and Markram’s, the three wickets falling for 15 in 17 balls. Miller suffered just his second first-baller in all of his 106 T20I innings.

It mattered little in terms of the bigger picture. The Americans showed fight without dragging the match close enough to a contest often enough to concern South Africa. Five overs in the second half their innings earned 10 or more runs each, but they went into that phase needing more than two runs a ball. 

Andries Gous hit Anrich Nortjé for a four and two sixes in a 15th over that sailed for 19. Gous also hammered two of the three sixes that boomed in the 19th, bowled by Tabraiz Shamsi, which cost 22. How much would the South Africans rue their puzzling decision to leave out death bowler Ottneil Baartman?

Not a lot with Kagiso Rabada around. He wasn’t at his best in the first four matches, in which he looked listless and took 4/84. But his intelligence and experience shone through on Wednesday, when three of his four overs went for six or fewer runs and he took 3/18.

Gous’ career-best 80 not out off 47, and the 91 off 43 he shared with Harmeet Singh for the ninth wicket, limited the margin of South Africa’s win to 18 runs. The Americans’ 176/6 was their fifth-highest total in the 32 T20Is they have played and their second-highest against full member opponents.

Even so, something was missing from the US’ performance. The omission was at once tangible and not, and maybe not an issue for many among the resolutely cricketminded. But this is a World Cup. It is about representation and how teams that brand themselves as national present themselves.

That brings us to Willie Mays, the Say Hey Kid, who said goodbye on Tuesday, aged 93. Sadly the US team did not wear black armbands, or do anything else, to mark the moment.

Mays was, essentially, AB de Villiers. But better. He was among the greatest players ever to grace any era in any sport anywhere. Only five MLB players have hit more than Mays’ 660 home runs, and two of them were drug cheats. Just six scored more runs, also including a drug cheat. Mays was among 33 players who have had 3,000 or more base hits, but he remains the only member of that club who also averaged at least .300, hit more than 300 home runs and stole more than 300 bases. And he did all that never far from the sharp end of racism. Mays grew up idolising Joe DiMaggio, who said of him: “Willie Mays is the closest to being perfect I’ve ever seen.”

That May’s cricketing compatriots didn’t acknowledge his demise on Wednesday was a dereliction of duty. Only four members of their XI were born in the US, but that was no excuse. The letters on their playing shirts read USA, so best they represent the USA. Not perfectly, but properly.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Bastardised baseball, corrupted cricket …

Baseball isn’t cricket and cricket isn’t baseball. They are second cousins twice removed.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

PEOPLE living in the United States whose heritage does not stem from a society where cricket is a major sport might wonder what has been going in Dallas, Lauderhill and Nassau County for the past 15 days and will continue until Sunday. And bang in the middle of the baseball season, no less. Questions, they’ll have a few.

Why do people in other places play this bastardised baseball instead of the real thing? Why does the strange game have the same name as an insect? Why do some of its adherents consider baseball to be corrupted cricket? Why do cricket fans think games matter more when they are played by teams representing countries rather than franchises?

Why are cricket bats flat? Why aren’t batters compelled to run every time they hit the ball in front of them? Why are they allowed to run when they hit the ball behind them?

Why is the ball not delivered to batters from a standing start? Why is the idea to bounce the ball in front of the batter? Why do you change pitchers after only six balls? Why don’t you change the pitcher if their first two balls sail for home runs? Why do you rotate the place you pitch from? Why must your arm stay straight when you’re pitching? Why are some pitchers’ deliveries so slow?

Why is the strike zone denoted by bits of wood? Why is it sometimes one strike and you’re out? Why isn’t it four balls outside of the strike zone and you walk to first base? Why don’t you walk when you’re hit by a pitch? Why is there only one base? Why can’t up to four members of the batting team be on the field at the same time? Why are there so many runs?

Why does only one member of the fielding team wear gloves? Why is there a fuss about whether a fielder has touched the boundary when the ball is close by? Why don’t fans keep the ball when someone hits it into the crowd?

Why isn’t the inning — yes, singular — over when three batters are out? Why doesn’t the umpire stand behind the catcher? Why don’t players argue with the umpire enough to be ejected from the game? Why do managers never appear on the field to argue with the umpire? Why don’t coaches come out to advise struggling pitchers?    

Despite common factors like wooden bats and leather balls, some modes of dismissal, and a similar set of required skills, baseball isn’t cricket and cricket isn’t baseball. They are second cousins twice removed. The definitive difference between the two sports is about who controls the rhythm of play. In baseball, it’s the pitcher. In cricket, it’s the batter.

Baseball bats are round, making it far more difficult to meet the ball solidly. To hit the ball fairly, and thus being allowed to head for first base, means sending it within the 90-degree v formed by the foul lines. Hitting it into that area forces you to run towards first base, no matter how easily the ball might be fielded. All of which puts batters at a distinct disadvantage.

A baseball batting average of .300 is considered excellent. That means the game’s best batters fail to reach base by hitting the ball safely — between the foul lines, and without being caught or put out at a base or home plate — in fewer than two-thirds of their plate appearances. Clearly, pitchers rule this roost.

Because cricket bats are flat, because batters have the choice whether or not to run after they hit the ball, because they can hit it all around the wicket and still run, because they only have to reach the other end of the pitch to score a run — not go all the way around the diamond — they are in charge in cricket.

A good cricket innings can last hours, yield hundreds of runs, and consume even more balls. Hanif Mohammed spent 970 minutes — more than 16 hours, or theoretically long enough to play more than five entire T20s — scoring 337 for Pakistan against West Indies at Kensington Oval in January 1958. Balls faced were not counted then, but in time terms it remains the longest Test innings. The longest recorded MLB at-bat — the equivalent of an innings — belongs to Brandon Belt, who lasted 21 pitches in 13 minutes for the San Francisco Giants against the Los Angeles Angels in Anaheim in April 2018. The potted purgatory ended when he was caught in right field. 

Still, there are alluring connection points between baseball and cricket. Both games go on for significantly longer than most other sports. Both move to more or less the same tempo, T20 perhaps excepted. The seam is as important on a baseball as it is on a cricket ball, but on a baseball it looks like a stitched, raised version of a tennis ball’s curvilinear pattern. Cricketers, like baseball players, wear caps and helmets. 

The grip and delivery of a pitcher’s curve ball is almost identical to that of a finger spinner’s standard turning delivery. The idea, in baseball, is for the ball to break downward through the air and veer slightly away from a righthanded batter. Without bouncing, of course. If it does bounce and the batter swings and misses anyway, that’s a strike.

Keshav Maharaj almost found out what happens when finger spinners don’t land their deliveries in Nassau County on Monday. Assigned to defend 10 in the last over of South Africa’s men’s T20 World Cup game against Bangladesh, he produced three full tosses. Baseball fans wouldn’t have blinked at that. South Africa’s supporters blinked hard.

Thanks to two catches in the deep by Aiden Markram — one of them a brilliant running, leaping effort — Maharaj got away with it and his team won by four runs. Again, baseball watchers wouldn’t have been impressed. Outfielders take catches like that in every game, sometimes crashing into walls — mercifully padded — as they do so. And then, often, they have to fire off a throw to one of the bases or home plate to try and stop an advancing runner.

Mostly, cricket is not baseball and baseball is not cricket. Americans have had seven T20 World Cup warm-up games — three of them washed out — and 10 matches in the tournament proper to parse the differences, point out the similarities, and ponder the peculiarities. They will have six more before the action moves to the Caribbean exclusively on Monday.

Might some of the curious among them, particularly if they are not of South Asian or West Indian heritage, or anywhere else cricket has a firm foothold, keep watching next week? Maybe that will depend on how their MLB teams are doing.

If you’re a fan of the New York Yankees, the Cleveland Guardians, the Seattle Mariners, the Philadelphia Phillies, the Milwaukee Brewers or the Los Angeles Dodgers — who lead their respective divisions as the halfway mark of the 162-game regular season approaches — the ongoing T20 World Cup probably won’t feature in your viewing schedule. But if you root for the Tampa Bay Rays, the Chicago White Sox, the Oakland Athletics, the Miami Marlins, the Pittsburgh Pirates or the Colorado Rockies — the bottom clubs — you might stay tuned in.

Because, whether you’re into baseball or cricket, or bastardised baseball or corrupted cricket, everyone loves a winner.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Show them the money, Shohei Ohtani

“Back in the ’70s and ’80s I wish I’d had an interpreter. I’d be scot-free.” – Pete Rose, banned from baseball for life for gambling, on Shohei Ohtani’s explanation for illegal bets placed using his banking account.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

MAYBE you don’t know of Shohei Ohtani. Doubtless you do know of Babe Ruth, who arrived on the big league baseball scene in 1914 as a pitcher who could bat and became the greatest home run hitter the game had seen.

Ohtani, 29, is the closest thing to Ruth in modern baseball, where allrounders are mythical creatures. He bats! He pitches! He breathes fire! Not quite. But he is almost unheard of in strictly specialised American sport. His clunky classification as a “two-way player” didn’t exist as an official designation until 2020.

Major League Baseball (MLB) has been confounded by Ohtani since 2018, when he first played for the Los Angeles Angels after establishing himself with the Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters in his native Japan. In December he signed the biggest contract in the history of sport — a 10-year deal with the Los Angeles Dodgers worth US$700-million. Or US$26-million more than Barcelona agreed to pay Lionel Messi in 2017, albeit for only four years’ work. 

Ohtani was Rookie of the Year in 2018 but struggled with injuries in 2019 and 2020. In 2021 he became the only player to hit more than 10 home runs, steal more than 20 bases, record more than 100 strikeouts and pitch in more than 10 games in a single MLB season. He was a shoo-in as the Most Valuable Player.

In 2022 Ohtani was the first player since Ruth’s era to bat and pitch often enough to make it onto the leaderboard in both departments. “Normally I don’t worry about those types of numbers but I was getting close and wanted to see what it feels like,” Ohtani said in Japanese. His words were translated by an interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara. Remember that name.

In the World Baseball Classic (WBC) final in Miami in March last year, Ohtani duelled the US’ Mike Trout, then his Angels teammate and a bona fide star, with two out in the top of the ninth, no-one on base and Japan leading 3-2. Ohtani took Trout to a full count of three balls and two strikes. Unless the next pitch was hit foul something had to give. Ohtani produced a wicked slider that veered away from the swinging Trout’s bat to reel in a strike out and clinch Japan’s first title since 2009.

More than 55-million viewers saw that. Seven months later a total of 45.51-million watched all five games as the Texas Rangers earned their first World Series trophy by beating the Arizona Diamondbacks. That’s an average of 9.08-million per game, or more than six times fewer than for the WBC climax. 

Ohtani has yet to feature in a World Series. If and when he does, expect those numbers to be hit out of the park. Merely signing him improved the Dodgers’ chances of winning this year by 3.4%, according to the bookies. And that’s despite the team knowing he can’t pitch until at least 2025 because of an elbow injury.

Undoubtedly Ohtani is good for the baseball business. But is some of the business around baseball good for him? Here’s where Mizuhara, the interpreter, comes back into the story.

The Dodgers fired him in March after Ohtani’s lawyers alleged he had hacked the player’s banking account to pay a bookmaker in California, where betting on sport is illegal. A federal investigation cleared Ohtani, and Mizuhara has been charged with bank fraud for stealing more than US$16-million from Ohtani.

Gambling has been baseball’s kryptonite since the Chicago White Sox were bribed, reportedly by mob boss Arnold Rothstein, to throw the 1919 World Series. The scandal resulted in the appointment in 1920 of the game’s first commissioner, Kenesaw Mountain Landis, a judge who became the most powerful man in baseball. Ruth himself was obliged to write to Landis in 1924: “You can rest assured that I do not intend to do any more betting on the [horse] races.”

Not everybody is willing to let Ohtani go so quietly. Pete Rose was headed for the Hall of Fame before his betting on baseball while he was a player and a manager was exposed. He was banned for life. What did Rose make of Ohtani’s explanation? In a recent TikTok video that seems to have been shot in a casino, Rose says: “Back in the ’70s and ’80s I wish I’d had an interpreter. I’d be scot-free.” Doubtless Hansie Cronjé would concur. 

Financial Mail

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

David Miller is no fuss, all finish …

… but he wouldn’t be much good at baseball.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

DAVID Miller makes for a powerful argument against the view that T20 is closer to baseball than cricket, an opinion the lusty left-hander disproved not for the first time while master-blasting Gujarat Titans to victory over Rajasthan Royals in their IPL qualifier at Eden Gardens on Tuesday.

The last two sixes Miller hit in a hattrick of maximums that sealed victory would not have counted had he been playing baseball. Instead, they would have been foul balls. Or balls not hit into the 90 degrees between, in cricket terms, a straight line from middle stump through cover and to the boundary, and another drawn from middle stump through wide mid-on to that fence. All a foul ball earns you in baseball is a strike against your name — though it can’t be strike three — or dismissal: you can be caught off a foul ball.

Two of Miller’s three fours and 17 of his total of 26 singles and twos would also have been declared foul. He would have had two strikes against him from swings and misses, and one ball in his favour because it was outside an imaginary strike zone. He was twice hit by deliveries, which would have earned him walks to first base. The first of them was the fifth ball he faced. That would have ended his innings without him having achieved much.

Pitches come to baseball batters on the full, but they should not be confused with cricket’s full tosses, which are often easier to hit than deliveries that bounce first. The seams on a baseball, which follow a similar pattern to those on a tennis ball, are noticeably more raised than on a cricket ball. That makes a baseball dip and swerve every which way through the air significantly more sharply than a cricket ball, and at between 150 and 160 kilometres an hour. MLB pitchers have fine control even at that speed. Also, a baseball is always new — it’s replaced whenever a pitch bounces or is hit out of the playing area. 

So, had Miller been playing baseball on Tuesday, his scintillating 38-ball 68 not out would have been reduced to a middling 35 off 38. And probably fewer than that considering hitting a baseball properly is exponentially more difficult than dealing with a cricket ball. A baseball bat does not have a cricket bat’s flat face, which tips the balance between bat and ball firmly in the former’s favour. The opposite is true of baseball, where the bat is as round as the ball you’re expected to hit. This is the most important point of departure between the two sports. It means that in cricket, particularly in T20, the finisher is a batter. In baseball, the role is played by a pitcher — a relief pitcher or “closer”.

Mariano Rivera, who played for the New York Yankees for 19 seasons, was the finest closer of them all. His total of 652 saves — awarded to a pitcher who preserves his team’s lead in a game, subject to certain conditions — is an all-time MLB record. His busiest summer as a reliever — he was a starting pitcher in 1995, his debut season — was 1996, when he threw 1,602 pitches. He was paid USD131,125 that year. In 2002, he threw only 724 times to get the job done and was paid USD9.45-million.

Also in 2002, the Yankees’ most used starting pitcher, Mike Mussina, threw 3,350 pitches and was paid USD11-million. So Rivera earned 85.91% of Mussina’s salary for shouldering only 21.61% of his workload. All told, Rivera threw 19,438 pitches and was paid almost USD170-million. Mussina’s 53,509 pitches across 18 seasons for the Baltimore Orioles and the Yankees earned him USD144.5-million. Rivera’s pitches fetched USD8713.95 apiece, and Mussina’s USD2701.11. Why was Rivera worth more than three times as Mussina to his team despite working almost three times less than the starter? Because he was available for most games — typically starters pitch only once every five games — but mainly because, as the closer, he nailed down wins. He was the cool-headed finisher.

Cool-headed big hitters of Miller’s calibre do with the bat what pitchers like Rivera do with the ball. Miller has been at the crease 17 times when his IPL teams, Kings XI Punjab and Rajasthan, have won batting second. In that scenario, he has scored five half-centuries — among them efforts of 80 not out and 94 not out — and a century. Only three times in matches in which his team have chased has he finished on the losing side despite scoring an unbeaten half-century. When he has been dismissed in the single figures with his team hunting a target, they have won four times and lost 10 times. The upshot is that, like Rivera, finishers like Miller are good for business.

Can there be any surprise that the most consummate of the ilk in cricket history, MS Dhoni, holds the record for not outs in the IPL with 79? That’s in 234 matches, 26 of which his team have won with him at the crease. In those terms, he has reached 50 five times.

Connecting the dots between baseball players like Rivera and cricketers like Miller and Dhoni may seem, well, dotty. But it offers an avenue for understanding the similarities and differences between the world’s two greatest bat-and-ball games, neither of which can be seriously considered superior to the other.

Even so, there is a stark degree of separation between these three stars. Miller has earned USD9.5-million from his dozen IPL campaigns. Dhoni, who has played in all 15 editions, has made USD21.2-million from the tournament. So playing for the Yankees earned Rivera more than 15 and seven times as much as Miller and Dhoni have been paid by the IPL.

But that equation isn’t settled there. Dhoni has also played 538 matches across the formats for India and, of course, guided them to World Cup glory. Miller has won 238 white-ball caps for South Africa, and turned out for 13 teams — aside from his IPL franchises and South Africa — based in seven different countries. There’s more to them as professionals, and thus their bank balances, than their IPL exploits.

Maybe the buck stops with their estimated net worth. Miller’s is USD11-million, Rivera’s USD90-million, and Dhoni’s USD113-million. But even that isn’t conclusive, because Rivera retired in 2013. What might Dhoni’s net worth be nine years after he calls it quits? Or when cricket’s finest finisher finally finishes finishing. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Never alone: the corona culture of sport and fandom

If a wicket falls in an empty stadium and no-one hears it, has it really fallen? The virus vexed future of playing and watching sport.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

“WHEN you walk through a storm.” Even the most casual football person knows what’s coming. “Hold your head up high.” If, somehow, they don’t know, the internet will tell them. “And don’t be afraid of the dark.”

There aren’t quite enough recorded versions … “At the end of a storm …” to assign one to each of the 54 074 seats at Anfield. “ … There’s a golden sky …” But many have been made since 1945 … “And the sweet silver song of a lark …” when it featured in Carousel, a Rodgers and Hammerstein musical.

“Walk on through the wind …” These lines have been ringing out wherever Scousers, actual and aspirant, have gathered since Gerry and the Pacemakers went to No. 1 in the UK charts in 1963. “Walk on through the rain …” At this point even non-Liverpool supporters pause to pay their respects, because this isn’t any anthem.

“Though your dreams be tossed and blown …” It’s the sound of loyalty and belonging … “Walk on, walk on …” and of knowing you are among comrades … “With hope in your heart …” This, surely, is the sound of love.

“And you’ll never walk alone … You’ll never walk alone.”

But, late on the night of July 22, Liverpool’s players and staff were indeed alone. With each other. They had gathered on a specially constructed podium in the stands of their famous stadium’s even more famous Kop end, which was draped in banners and flags.

The dazzling football both teams had played that evening, unhinged in the best way from having to take things seriously, in Liverpool’s 5-3 win over Chelsea was irrelevant. Nothing had mattered in the English Premier League since June 25, when Chelsea beat Manchester City to ensure Liverpool would win the title for the first time in 30 years.

As Jordan Henderson, Liverpool’s captain, thrust the trophy into the night sky, his players boomed their triumph behind him and lights, fireworks, music and glittery confetti filled millions of screens around the world. But there was a hollowness at the heart of the scene that could only have been filled by occupants of those 54 074 empty, silent seats. The only witnesses, bar the functionaries, were Anfield’s ghosts of successes and failures past.

You’ll Never Walk Alone had, of course, swooned around the void before kick-off. Lacking human embrace, the music bounced back the unhearing hardness, cold in its rejection. But the first touch of the ball was accompanied, on television, by a warm cheer for the champions.

Fact’s petticoat slipped from under fiction’s ballgown at the start of the second half, when the canned noise kicked in a heartbeat too late to spare viewers the rippling echoes of the players’ shouting and clapping their encouragement to each other. For a moment, sad reality was all there was to hear.

It’s the job of Adam Peri, a Sky Sports sound supervisor, to spare us that terrifying sound. National Public Radio sought him out and found him twiddling knobs for West Ham’s match against Watford in a studio kilometres from London Stadium. “Making sure the West Ham chants are nice and loud,” Peri said. A West Ham player went down. “I’m just going to trickle in a bit of whistles; giving it a bit of a boo …” 

He sees his role as “trying to anticipate what a player might do next, and in a way I guess I’m reading their mind. When you really get into the zone you’re living and breathing the game, feeling confident enough to use any sound that is available to help tell the story.”

The sounds Peri edits into viewers’ consciousness have been recorded at earlier matches by Electronic Arts, or EA Sports (EA), the makers of the FIFA video game. EA sound designer Paul Boechler revealed some of the geekery at play: “There’s things like the ‘oooh’ reaction for a save, and the ‘ooooooh’ reaction to a miss.” 

In football matches broadcast from Spain, a mosaic overlay was applied to camera shots that included the stands to break up views of endless rows of unfilled seats. Another difference will confirm the suspicions of those from sunnier climes that England’s unrelenting winter greyness seeps into hearts and minds. “The Premier League is doing negative reactions, but La Liga is actually not,” Boechler said. “La Liga is going with a much more positive reaction focus overall.”

La Liga head of communications Joris Evers confirmed as much, and added: “But it’s not the same. We want to try and get real fans back in the stands as soon as possible.” 

And so says all of sport. If a wicket falls in an empty cricket ground and no-one hears it, has it really fallen? England and West Indies restarted cricket with three Tests played in Southampton and Manchester. Not a lot besides the low burble of a crowd, artificially added by Sky, could by heard.

Without spectators the sound of major sport is of one hand clapping. That may be no bad thing. Instead of Sky’s audio smoke and mirrors, we could hear managers chewing gum between barks at their players. In Germany, Bundesliga viewers had the option of tuning out the canned atmosphere so they could do exactly that.

But it’s complicated, as the television audience discovered during a baseball game between the Los Angeles Dodgers and the Houston Astros in Houston played on the same day Liverpool raised the trophy. When Dodgers pitcher Joe Kelly lingered at first base after a confrontational play, Astros manager Dusty Baker, out of sight but not out of range of the microphones, was heard yelling, “Just get on the mound, motherfucker.”

Baseball has had an interesting relationship with empty stadiums. Alternative plans have had to be made for the millions of peanuts grown and roasted to be sold at games in the US, what with each team’s regular season schedule hacked from 162 to only 60 games. In Taiwan, cheerleaders smiled and danced at desolate stands. Down the road in South Korea, teams were in trouble after dressing up sex dolls and putting them in the stands. Bookmakers in the US have adjusted their odds to account for the assumption that, without spectators, home advantage isn’t nearly as influential.

Something similar happened in the Bundesliga, where teams achieved demonstrably better results than previously when they played away. And diving disappeared. What’s the point of trying to fool the referee by rolling like a freshly felled log for metres on end if thousands of one-eyed home fans aren’t howling in sympathy?

Will the seeming silence of the scrum, beyond the hit and heave, be shattered by the sounds of one pack of forwards trying to monster the other? Some of those noises come from strange places and are better unheard. It seems SuperSport, the primary broadcasters of the game in South Africa, will spare us the gorier details once rugby resumes. A spokesperson said the network was “still tweaking the tech, but as a matter of principle, we will incorporate virtual sounds, crowds and fan interaction”.

Even so, as long as stadiums stay empty except for players, officials and camera operators, a human-shaped vacuum will gape at the heart of sport. Professor Heather Reid is the philosophy chair at Morningside College in Sioux City, Iowa. She sits on the boards of publications like the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport and Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. Less extraordinarily, she’s also a fan, as she explained to the BBC: “I was in the bird’s nest stadium in Beijing the night that Usain Bolt broke the world record in the 100 metres [at the 2008 Olympics], and there’s this feeling that goes over the crowd that makes everyone feel like hugging each other. We transcend our partisan rooting for particular countries and a particular athlete, and we all start cheering just for what a human being is able to do.”

Unfortunately for all who know and cherish that feeling, another professor, bioethicist Andy Miah, the science communication and future media chair at the University of Salford in Manchester, is here to burst that bubble. “The big transition that people are coming to terms with is the idea that we are able to live within virtual worlds,” he said. “It’s really remarkable what’s happened over the last few months.”

Miah listed the Mutua Madrid Virtual Open Pro tennis tournament, which featured Andy Murray and Rafael Nadal squaring off not across a net but in front of a computer, holding controllers instead of racquets, as an example. And the Australia Virtual F1 Grand Prix, which replaced the cancelled real-world version: suddenly gamers were competing with drivers.

“Reality is going through a major upheaval,” Miah said. “Sport has always been a kind of unreality. We’re beginning to see a complete change of the relationship between the spectator and the player. People want to be part of the production of the sport, not just be spectators of it.”

Already, Formula E drivers’ electric cars go faster when they use a “fanboost” — a surge of bonus power available to the five drivers who win the most supporters’ votes. “We can imagine a future where you have crowds making decisions in the field of play in a much more direct way,” Miah said.        

The fans, it seems, are no longer content to watch alone.

First published by New Frame.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.