Crouch, catch and keep the faith

“I always like to be involved in the game and the reality is I’m not very good at bowling.” – Kyle Verreynne

Telford Vice / Seville

ARE you or have you ever been a wicketkeeper? Several people who were in the Oval’s dressing rooms for the third Test between England and South Africa could answer in the affirmative. There’s Ben Foakes and Kyle Verreynne, of course. But also Brendon McCullum and Mark Boucher. And a fair few more where they come from. 

Ollie Pope has kept in 134 matches, seven of them first-class for Surrey, England Lions and England — the latter in a Test in Hamilton in 2019. Ben Duckett’s 162 games as a stumper include 13 at first-class level for Northamptonshire. Jack Leach donned the gloves and pads for Somerset’s under-17 side in 2008. In the same match, he bowled 22 overs, batted at No. 3, and captained. Ollie Robinson didn’t do quite as much for Kent under-13s in 2006, when he kept and bowled four overs. But he kept, bowled 24 and 13 overs, and batted at No. 5 for Surrey’s second XI in 2016. Robinson’s not to be confused with the other Ollie Robinson — Oliver George rather than Oliver Edward — who is also a product of Kent, but a career keeper who has been in gloves and pads for 244 of his 286 games, 39 of them first-class, going back to his under-13 days. 

Harry Brook, Zak Crawley and Alex Lees each had a game behind the stumps for the Yorkshire and Kent junior representative teams. Lees bowled two overs during his. Joe Root featured in two games as a keeper for Sheffield Collegiate in 2007 and 2008. England have a wicketkeeping coach: James Foster played seven Tests in the position in 2001 and 2002. 

Keegan Petersen has been the designated keeper in 10 first-class matches for the Cobras, the Knights, Northern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal Coastal, and Ryan Rickelton in 24 for the Lions and Gauteng. Aiden Markram kept in two games during the 2014 under-19 World Cup. Wiaan Mulder did so in five games for Gauteng’s under-13 side in 2011. As did Glenton Stuurman for South Western Districts in an under-19 game in 2010, when he also opened the batting, and in a match for Balderton — a Nottingham club — in 2016, when he batted at No. 3 and captained the side.

Were it not for the dangerous game of golf, Jonny Bairstow also would have been in the Oval frame with his 139 first-class appearances as a wicketkeeper, 49 of them Tests. He was removed from the equation for the Oval Test by a leg injury sustained on a course near Harrogate seven days before the start of the match.

That almost half the players in the England and South Africa squads — 15 out of the 31 — have wicketkeeping experience, however removed from the senior stage, is the answer to a stinker of a pub quiz question. Another is whether keepers see the game differently, in the way that baseball catchers do because, as former MLB catcher Jeff Torborg famously said, “There must be some reason we’re the only ones facing the other way.”

The issue was more complex in cricket, as Verreynne told Cricbuzz: “Out of 11 players in the team there are probably 11 different views on how the game is going. As a keeper you probably see things differently, but the slips will have a similar view. From reading the game and seeing where it’s at and how the pitch is playing, what the ball’s doing, what the bowler’s trying to do, how the batter’s setting up; all of those things, as a keeper you’ve got one of the best views of all of that. That allows you to add value.”

Measuring that value isn’t straightforward. According to Rivash Gobind, South Africa’s analyst, Verreynne collected 152 of the 271 legal deliveries that were bowled to England’s batters in the first Test. Seventy of them were left alone, and 82 were played at and missed. The equation changed at Old Trafford, where Verreynne dealt with 108 of 640 balls, 56 of them left and 52 missed. He also took six catches and claimed a stumping. So almost 30% of all the balls bowled to English players in the first two Tests became his responsibility. Without a wicketkeeper to stop those deliveries going to the boundary, England would have scored 1,068 more runs than the 729 they made. Maybe that’s how a keeper’s worth should be calculated.

How Ben Stokes isn’t on the list of once were wicketkeepers in the series is as good a question as any considering the gloves are often worn, particularly at lower levels, by the best player in the side or the best athlete; regardless of keeping aptitude. And Stokes is a freakishly gifted player and athlete.

Too gifted, perhaps, for the working class heroism of keeping wicket. The labour of even the most elite keepers tends to go if not unnoticed then under-noticed. Perhaps that’s because they are seen as batters first and stumpers second. It wasn’t always that way. Of the 285 men who have served as the designated keeper in Tests, 181 have never scored a century at that level. Only seven of the 285 — 3.87% — have played a Test in the 2020s.

Test cricket has fallen out of love with keepers like Wasim Bari, Deryck Murray and Niroshan Dickwella — who have had 112, 96 and 92 innings without scoring a century — and become drawn to the likes of Andy Flower, Kumar Sangakkara, MS Dhoni, Mushfiqur Rahim, Taslim Arif, Imtiaz Ahmed, BJ Watling, Adam Gilchrist and Brendon Kuruppu, who have each scored a double century and made 60 hundreds between them. Dickwella is a throwback in that he is still at it, whereas Bari had his last Test as a keeper in 1984 and Murray in 1980. The trailblazer for the modern trend was Ahmed, who played all of his 41 Tests between 1952 and 1962.

Foakes and Verreynne are members in good standing of the stumpers’ century society. Foakes made 107 on debut in Galle in 2018 and 113 not out at Old Trafford in the second Test against South Africa, and Verreynne scored an undefeated 136 in Christchurch in February. But the England-South Africa series was unusual in that, unlike many of their peers, who came to keeping after making a name for themselves with the bat, Foakes and Verreynne have been there since they were about as tall as the stumps themselves.

“It started for me as an under-10, where it’s all about giving everyone equal opportunity,” Verreynne said. “In my first two or three games of hard-ball cricket, I opened the bowling and the batting. I don’t know how I opened the bowling, but I did. But the coach realised he couldn’t let me do everything. He said he needed to give the other guys opportunities. So I needed to choose if I wanted to bat high in the order and not bowl as much, or bowl and not bat as much. I chose batting. But I found myself pretty bored standing in the field. I asked, seeing as I wasn’t bowling much, if I could keep. He said sure. From the next game I kept, and ever since then I’ve been a keeper.”

Sixteen years on, Verreynne hasn’t changed his mind: “You definitely go through times when keeping isn’t as fun, but I always like to be involved in the game and the reality is I’m not very good at bowling. In the field, you go through phases where you’re standing on the boundary or in the covers, and not much is happening. It’s always enjoyable being on the field, but it’s a lot more enjoyable knowing that you’re in the game every single ball and you’ve got a chance to make a difference and make an impact. Keeping is hard work, but I’d rather have that than standing in the outfield waiting for something to happen.”

Foakes first kept wicket as an under-12, and was proclaimed as “the best wicketkeeper in the world” four years ago by no less than Alec Stewart, who played 303 internationals for England across the formats, 220 of them as a keeper and 51 as a captain and keeper. Besides, Foakes looks the part — all subtle, silky movements and artful crumpling of his lanky frame. That smooths over the fact that, at 1.85 metres, he is taller than many who spend most of their working lives in a crouch. Verreynne is 10 centimetres shorter than Foakes, and consequently has to act more emphatically to haul in more wayward deliveries. “You get guys who are tall who can move a lot better than I can, and you get short guys who can jump a lot higher than I can,” Verreynne said. Still, there was little to separate Foakes and Verreynne in overall effectiveness during the series. Foakes conceded 15 byes in the rubber and Verreynne 14. Each dropped a catch.

Did Verreynne take notes on his counterpart? “He’s tall and has good reach. I’m quite short and I don’t have reach as good as his. So it’s difficult to implement what he does because our styles of keeping are very different and we have different assets. But I have picked up a few things. There’s nothing specific, but I’ve seen that he’s done a lot of work on the wobbling ball and the ball that swings after it passes the bat.”

The Oval Test was Verreynne’s 57th first-class match behind the stumps and his 11th Test, and Foakes’ 104th and 17th, a difference not lost on Dean Elgar, who said of Verreynne: “He’s learning his trade at the toughest level, and he’s getting better every time I see him prepare or play. It’s nice to have a guy who’s young and still pushing the boundaries for himself. You can see he’s doing things that no-one is telling him to do, and his keeping is unreal. He’s a really good team guy and everyone loves him.”

Charl Langeveldt, South Africa’s bowling coach, agreed that bowlers gained confidence from knowing they had a pro behind the stumps: “I’ve seen a lot of keepers come to England over the years and struggle, especially on their first tour. And nevermind the bouncers Anrich Nortjé bowls. I need to get Kyle a ladder! He’s been excellent, especially when the ball has gone down leg and when he has had to dive forward.”

Mark Boucher was a case study in a keeper undone by English conditions. In his first Test series there, in 1998, he dived one way while the ball veered the other after pitching often enough for Jonathan Agnew to lament on commentary, “Poor old Boucher.” The byes mounted to 89 — 8.9 per innings. But keepers tend to be quick learners: when Boucher was next in England, in 2003, he kept the byes down to 37 — 4.63 per innings. In 2008, that shrank to 25 — 3.13 per innings.

Boucher learnt a few things to pass down to Verreynne. Who needs a keeping coach when the head coach has been there for 147 Tests? “His experience in England gives him valuable input that he’s been giving me,” Verreynne said. “I’ve tried to tap into him as much as possible; what worked for him, what didn’t work for him.” But Verreynne understood that the buck — even the ball — stopped with him, physically and mentally: “Coming to England I was aware of what the conditions were going to be like. It’s been about me putting in as much preparation as I possibly can. Something ‘Bouch’ has mentioned quite a bit to me is, you are going to make mistakes. What’s important is that you are able to put them behind you and focus on the next ball.”

Verreynne’s performance was remarkable considering his previous keeping experience in England amounted to a single T20 for North Devon in 2016. How had he made the required adjustment? “I’ve spent more time than usual on my keeping in England. When you’re in South Africa there’s not as much wobble and swing after the bat. I wouldn’t spend as much time on keeping as I have here, where keeping is as much if not more of a focus than batting.”

Like most aspects of fielding, keeping can be learnt. Hence the fashion for turning batters into keepers. Boucher, for instance, was a batter until his penultimate year of high school. But keepers wouldn’t get far without showing, early on, a gift for the role. Which mattered more, technique or talent? “Technically it’s important that you have a few things covered,” Verreynne said. “But keeping is instinctive. You have a feeling for what the pitch is playing like, what the ball is doing. You allow your instincts to take over in terms of where you’re standing and how you’re trying to catch the ball and position yourself. But there’s value in having a good technical base.”

Verreynne didn’t value giving opponents lip: “With stumps mics, the game has moved away from personal abuse and sledging. I’m not going to get engaged in on-field conflicts. I try and focus on having good energy and keeping the team going. I make sure everyone is switched on at all times, and in the right fielding position and aware of the plans. Being noisy and getting in the batter’s face isn’t me.”

He will likely be South Africa’s keeper in their series in Australia in December and January. Given the Aussies’ propensity for verbal violence, Verreynne’s opinion on that part of the keeper’s craft is sure to be tested.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Elgar on ice after batting bruise, and with runs required

“It hurt the team to get beaten like that after having beaten them in the same way in the first Test.” – Keegan Petersen

Telford Vice / London

DEAN Elgar and ice packs aren’t easily or often acquainted. But, during South Africa’s training session at the Oval on Tuesday, he stood quite still and held an ice pack in his left hand. It was clamped to his right shoulder. Clearly there was a problem.

The damage had been done by Mark Boucher, aided and abetted by one of those plastic contraptions meant for throwing balls to dogs in parks that have turned every coach into the poor person’s Malcolm Marshall.

Elgar soon dismissed the ice from his presence. Using his now freed left hand, he pulled his shirt open at the collar to enable South Africa’s medical staff to take a closer look at the shoulder. Then Sarel Erwee peeked in, smiling gingerly. Elgar took himself off towards slip fielding practice, lurking a fair way from the action. He held his right arm awkwardly, and tight to his body when he ran to retrieve a ball. His subsequent throw to send it back from whence it came looked like a squashed swearword.

But Erwee’s smile and the fact that Elgar was on the field at all said there was no danger of South Africa’s captain being ruled out of the third Test. Had the blow been suspected of leading to anything more serious than bruising, Elgar would have been on his way to hospital, not displaying his medal.

And a good thing, too. Because the visitors will likely need all the batting they can get once the match starts on Thursday. As will England, who were bowled out for 165 and 149 at Lord’s and returned the favour by dismissing South Africa for 151 and 179 at Old Trafford. Each match was decided by an innings in three days, and the series has returned to London locked at 1-1.

“It hurt the team to get beaten like that after having beaten them in the same way in the first Test,” Keegan Petersen told a press conference on Tuesday. What to do? “It’s obvious — we need to score hundreds up top,” Petersen said. “That hasn’t happened for a while now. The lower order have saved us a few times. It’s evident that the batters have to step up now and get a couple of big scores.”

No South Africa player has scored a century in the four Tests they have played since Kyle Verreynne made an undefeated 136 in Christchurch in February. But, fuelled by their bowlers and enough runs to get the job done, they have won three of those matches. England have played nine Tests in the same period. And scored 15 hundreds, which has powered them to five victories and limited their losses to two.

“It’s all mental,” Petersen said. “I don’t think we’ve struggled to get in. It’s getting starts and getting out, that’s the problem.” South Africa did that well enough to total 326 in the first innings at Lord’s. England went several better in declaring their first innings closed at 415/9 at Old Trafford. There was thus no mystery about the winning and losing of those games.

“In both Test matches it was lost in the first innings,” Petersen said. “It is evident that the conditions are leaning towards the bowlers to help give them that advantage. But if you can play the first innings better, that’s going to be the team who come out on top.”

England’s method has been the apparent madness of putting attack before all else, and usually ‘Bazball’ — named for Brendon McCullum, the approach’s mastermind — has worked for them.

“Everyone’s free to bat in the way they want to go about their innings,” Ollie Pope told a press conference. “This new era is not at all that you’ve got to go out there and whack it. You can go out there and take the positive option. If it doesn’t come off that’s not an issue. You’re going to have 100% backing from the changing room.

“Whether you want to run down the pitch to a seamer or spinner and try and hit him over the top, and you get out doing it, it’s about making sure you’ve thought a clear process through that; that you’ve got a clear reason why you want to take that attacking option.”

But the sword was double-edged: “It can swing quickly and it can be defined early in the game. It does help winning the previous one.”

Four of England’s most recent 15 hundreds belong to Jonny Bairstow and have made him the leading run-scorer in Test cricket this year. But he is out of the Oval match — and perhaps for as long as a year — with a leg injury sustained on a golf course last week. 

“It’s disappointing for us all,” Pope said. “He’s had an amazing summer and it’s been great to have him around the lads. We’re going to miss him, but we’ve got enough guys who’ve been around a long time to feed off each other. We’ll make up for his lost voice, in the field especially. It’s gutting that he’s not here because it would be a great way for him to finish the summer after the way he’s played.”

How hard would Bairstow’s absence hit England? “I wouldn’t say it weakens them, but you can’t deny that Jonny is a big player for them,” Petersen said. “Hopefully he recovers well. But [opponents] don’t thrive on that. I think if Harry Brook comes in he would be equally as good.”

Brook, uncapped in the format but in the squad, has scored 194, two mere centuries, five efforts of more than 70 and a half-century in a dozen first-class innings for Yorkshire this summer.

“He’s 100% got the game to take that into Test cricket,” Pope said of Brook, who he has played with at junior international level. “He’s got the mindset, he loves batting, and he’s all cricket. He’s not the type of guy to be fazed by the occasion.”

Even so, Brook might want to take on board Pope’s advice about how to handle the step up to the international game: “The quality of cricket isn’t necessarily the biggest thing. It’s the noise around it — what happens if you do have a few low scores? That’s the biggest thing to deal with at this level. It’s about not getting ahead of yourself and playing the situation; about trying to get used to an attack as quickly as you can and work out how they’re going to try and challenge you, and adapt as quickly as you can. If some flaws are shown, you need to smooth over them as quickly as you can and make your strengths your super strengths.”

Petersen also offered guidance on batting in a Test: “There’s no situation that can prepare you completely for it. It’s the situation in the middle that you have to prepare for, and you know it’s going to be tough. You have to at least try and fight through that tough period. That’s where you have to challenge yourself mentally all the time. There’s no real process of doing that. It’s just going to happen in the moment.”

Even without Bairstow, England have the stronger batting line-up. Joe Root has scored five of England’s 15 centuries, and Ben Stokes and Ben Foakes added the most recent examples at Old Trafford. They came together at the crease after the home side had slipped to 147/5, and shared a stand of 173. Stokes made 103 and Foakes 113 not out.

“There’s different ways you can go about this attacking way of playing, and he played a ridiculous knock,” Pope said of his captain’s innings. “It’s about attacking when the time is right, and sometimes you’ve got to weather the storm.”

Petersen also had good things to say about Stokes, who featured in half the six county championship matches the South African played for Durham in April and May: “He’s a good guy to have in the changeroom and a good human being. I was star-struck in the beginning. I’m new to international cricket, and to walk into the changeroom with one of the best allrounders in the world was nice.”

Of Petersen’s nine Tests, only two have gone to a fifth day. And not by much: India won two overs after lunch at Centurion in December, and Bangladesh were beaten in the first hour at Kingsmead in April. The way the Lord’s and Old Trafford matches hurtled to a conclusion suggested another torrid affair at the Oval. But Petersen hoped for more gametime: “I’d love to play for five days. I think that’s what the public wants to see. This is what we live for as cricketers; series deciders.”

Pope, who has played all 41 of his county championship matches for Surrey, added a cheeky rider to that: “It’s an exciting Test to be a part of, at the home of cricket.”

Or maybe that wasn’t so cheeky. It was at the Oval, after all, that England played their first two home Tests, against Australia in September 1880 and August 1882.

That wasn’t the only tangent whirling on Tuesday. Asked to confirm a theory that he was named after Kevin Keegan, Petersen delivered an answer sure to shock a country in which cricket has long since ceased to be the most popular sport: “My family doesn’t even watch football, so I can’t say that that’s true. Sorry, no.”

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Order changed after illness

Telford Vice / London

KYLE Verreynne batted one place lower than planned in the Lord’s Test after his grandfather took ill in the stands. 

South Africa’s official team sheet listed Verreynne at No. 6, but after the fourth wicket fell on Thursday, when Ben Stokes bounced out Sarel Erwee, Marco Jansen took guard. Verreynne came to the crease 12 balls later, after Ben Stokes trapped Rassie van der Dussen in front. Verreynne scored 11 before being caught behind to give Stuart Broad his 100th Test wicket at Lord’s. 

Earlier on Thursday, paramedics were called to the Edrich Stand to attend to Verreynne’s grandfather, who was overcome while watching the match. Sheets were held up to screen the medics and their patient from view, and that section of the crowd applauded as they made their way out of the ground. The incident was mentioned on the BBC’s live radio commentary, without naming who was involved.  

Cricbuzz understands Verreynne’s grandfather is recovering satisfactorily in hospital in London, and that other members of the family in the city have met with CSA officials.   

The South Africa camp are handling the matter with utmost sensitivity out of respect and care for Verreynne and his family, and declined to comment.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Counting on Quinton, deputising for De Kock

“Hopefully I can keep riding the wave.” – Heinrich Klaasen, who scored 51 and 123 at a strike rate of 145 in this week’s warm-up games.

Telford Vice | Palermo, Sicily

IT isn’t often that a scorecard names anyone, much less Quinton de Kock, at No. 16. Just as rare is Anrich Nortjé, Lizaad Williams, Lungi Ngidi and Marco Jansen being listed to bat ahead of him, and Tabraiz Shamsi one place behind.

It’s also unusual that, when he’s in a South Africa shirt, De Kock isn’t the designated wicketkeeper. Less few and far between, though noteworthy, are matches when he isn’t in the side despite being part of the squad.

But all of the above, whether outlandish, rare or merely unusual, was true of the South Africans’ first two matches of their tour of England this week, both of them white-ball games against the England Lions.

In Taunton on Tuesday, De Kock was No. 16 in the line-up in what amounted to a practice match involving all 17 of the visitors’ players; 11 of them batting and 11 fielding. Kyle Verreynne deputised for him by opening the batting with Janneman Malan and then keeping wicket. In Worcester on Thursday, in a standard 50-over game, De Kock wasn’t in the XI. Malan and Reeza Hendricks opened and Heinrich Klaasen — who had played as a batter only on Tuesday — wore the gloves and pads.

It was all a little odd considering De Kock has been behind the stumps in 243 of his 247 internationals across the formats. And because he’s missed less than a quarter of the matches — 99 of 346 — South Africa have played since he made his debut in a T20I against New Zealand at Kingsmead in December 2021.

Team management attributed De Kock’s absence to a bruised finger and said he had been rested as a precaution. So he is set, niggle permitting, to go into the ODI series that starts in Durham on Tuesday without having picked up a pair of wicketkeeping gloves in anger for more than three weeks and a bat for exactly a month.

That’s not much of a gamble on a player whose game is so grooved and grounded. De Kock will be trusted, justifiably, to resume batting the way he has in his last 15 ODI innings, in which he has scored three centuries and five 50s. But, in his 30th year, having retired from Tests in December and become a father in January, his priorities are shifting. Even though he has committed himself to South Africa’s foreseeable white-ball future, thoughts will turn to what happens when he goes fishing fulltime.

On this week’s evidence, there is no immediate cause for alarm. On Tuesday, Malan stood firm through five partnerships for his 103. Two days later, Klaasen — who had made a 35-ball 51 batting at No. 7 in Taunton — hammered 123 off 85 balls at No. 5. Verreynne is the straightest swap for De Kock as a serious batter who keeps, even though he has opened only twice in his 39 list A innings. But De Kock’s attributes are useful wherever they present themselves, and it can’t hurt to have two other confirmed ’keepers around.

“Hopefully I can keep riding the wave,” Klaasen, whose strike rate in the two games was 145, told a press conference on Thursday. He conceded that his innings in Worcester might have been cut short by a run out — “I think it was out; I need to buy the umpire a beer” — but was grateful for the support given him by Andile Phehlukwayo in his 67, which helped fuel a stand of 149 that flew off 99 deliveries. The partnership started after the visitors had slumped to 167/5 in the 30th over. “He took a lot of pressure off me when I got into an awkward stage of the innings,” Klaasen said. “He told me to just get to my hundred and he will take care of the rest, which he did.”

Klaasen and Phehlukwayo took their team into the 47th over together, and powered them to a total of 360/7. Keshav Maharaj had Will Smeed stumped and bowled Sam Hain in the first over of the Lions’ reply and without a run on the board, and they were dismissed for 253 in 38.2 overs. Things went better for the home side on Tuesday, when Smeed’s 56-ball 90 was one of three efforts of more than 50 in their 321/4, which overhauled the visitors’ 318/6 with 12.5 overs to spare.

The South Africans’ bowling has been less convincing, with no-one claiming more than three wickets across the two games and only Ngidi keeping the damage down to less than a run a ball.

But their compatriots know they can bank on the bowlers to bounce back once they get down to business in Durham on Tuesday. And on De Kock, if he’s passed fit to play, to do what he does almost as impressively as he catches fish.

First published by Cricbuzz. 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

How the SJN failed Paul Adams

“Being called ‘brown shit’ by teammates 20-odd years ago still echoes in my memories.” – Paul Adams

Telford Vice | Cape Town

PAUL Adams did not go to the Social Justice and Nation Building (SJN) hearings to name names. His testimony wasn’t about individuals or the actions of individuals. What he said was not a pitched fork deployed in a witch hunt. It was a plea for understanding and education.

And an alarm about a destructive fire that has always burnt through South Africa’s dressing room. To think it has been extinguished because CSA have dropped disciplinary charges against Mark Boucher, after losing their arbitration case against Graeme Smith last month, is to pour petrol on the flames.

Adams’ confirmation, in a statement on Sunday, that he would not testify at Boucher’s hearing doesn’t change that. There is racism in South African cricket because there is racism in South Africa. Only a sincere focus on eradicating racism in cricket, and our wider society, can change that. Only racists would disagree.

If Adams expected the dressing room to be a refuge from the white supremacist world just outside the door, he was sadly naive. Instead, he was demeaned as “brown shit” by his teammates during fines meetings held to, of all things, help celebrate victories. 

The abuse didn’t end with Adams. Boucher was called “wit naai” — “white fuck” — in the same dressing room. Even now red-haired members of the squad are told, by teammates of all races, that “gingers have no soul”. How might Heinrich Klaasen and Kyle Verreynne feel about that?

But Boucher, Klaasen and Verreynne step out of the dressing room and back into whiteness, where they are readily accepted as first-class citizens based on their whiteness alone. Adams steps back into whiteness as just another brown person, and so a target for racism, prejudice, unfair treatment and conscious and unconscious bias. If he were black, his lot would be worse still. That remains almost as true in 2022 as it was in 1992, when South Africa played their first Test after readmission.   

Adams made his debut almost two years before Boucher, and had played 18 matches for South Africa before the latter played his first. Thus the slur had no doubt been applied to Adams before Boucher heard it and participated in it. Adams played 69 internationals, of which South Africa won 37. That’s a lot of times to hear yourself described as “brown shit”.

Boucher played in 25 of those wins. The last of them was at Lord’s in 2003, when he hit 68 off 51 balls and Adams took the big wicket of Andrew Flintoff to seal success by an innings and 92 runs. Makhaya Ntini claimed 10 wickets and Smith, in just his fourth match as captain, scored 259 — which followed his 277 in the drawn first Test at Edgbaston. It is shocking to know that that shining day in South Africa’s cricket history ended with the players calling each other despicable names.

The match was Adams’ 63rd for the national team and Boucher’s 217th. By that stage of their careers — Adams was almost eight years into his international tenure and Boucher nearly six years in — were they not senior enough to raise their voices against such obvious misconduct? It’s not that simple.

Adams was just less than a month away from his 19th birthday when he first pulled on a South Africa cap, no doubt with great pride. Boucher was less than two months shy of turning 21 when he did the same, no doubt with identical feelings. Adams and Boucher were young, impressionable people thrust into a toxic environment. To be accepted they had to follow the lead of those who were already there — who themselves had inherited the traditions of the past, however wrong and damaging they were. It’s not as if incoming players are given a choice: here’s the culture, learn it or go home. Again, it’s not that simple.

South Africa’s new dawn on the road towards democracy was reached under Nelson Mandela on April 27, 1994, when the country held its first real elections. That’s the reason South Africans have the privilege of playing international sport. Cleansing toxic cultures is the least teams could do as gratitude for being given that privilege. But first they need to realise and accept that the culture is toxic.

How that did not happen in this case is an indictment on every player who has been part of the XI since readmission. That is even more true of those who had significant careers and especially of white players — as the leaders in the prevailing power dynamic, they alone could effect real change.

Not nearly enough progress had been made in this area when Adams testified at the SJN on July 22 last year. A measure of that was the lack of white witnesses at the hearings to rebut claims made against them, or to apologise. Jacques Faul, the Titans chief executive, was a notable exception. Boucher, like Smith, chose instead to restrict his involvement to a written submission riddled with lawyers’ weasel words and whataboutery.

Even though Boucher spent a good deal of his 14-page submission apologising and illustrating how he was invested in working towards a better culture, he still came across as aloof and unfeeling about hurt he had been accused of causing. Had he or his lawyers respected and trusted the SJN enough for Boucher to turn up in person — to present himself as a sinning and sinned against human being — he may never have been charged.

To leave his fate to the SJN report was a serious error. Dumisa Ntsebeza presided over the hearings with skill and warmth. Clearly, he didn’t know much about cricket. Just as clearly, that didn’t matter. Indeed, it was among the reasons to be hopeful: in a game shot through with contending agendas, he betrayed none. But Ntsebeza should be embarrassed by the report that has resulted. Adams has every right to feel insulted and betrayed. 

The SJN report quotes Adams as saying: “Being called ‘brown shit’ when I was playing by teammates 20-odd years ago still echoes in my memories. I recall that Mark Boucher in particular would call me by that name and would be used as a fines meeting song for me … ‘Brown shit in the ring, tra-la-la-la-la’. Yes I was having the time of my life playing for my country and being one of the first black players to represent my country so I brushed it off and focused on my game because I wasn’t going to allow these racists to affect my mindset. I knew then already what was happening was wrong. But there was no-one to talk to or to support a player who spoke up so like my fellow black friends it off and let it go.”

What Adams’ submission actually says is: “Being called ‘brown shit’ when I was playing by teammates 20-odd years ago still echoes in my memories. I recall that a few players would call me by that name and would be used as a fines meeting song for me … ‘Brown shit in the ring, tra-la-la-la …”. Yes I was having the time of my life playing for my country and being one of the first black players to represent my country so l brushed it off and focused on my game because I wasn’t going to allow these racists to affect my mindset. I knew then already what was happening was wrong. But there was no-one to talk to or to support a player who spoke up so like my fellow black friends I shrugged it off and let it go.”

Note the absence of Boucher’s name in the original version, as presented by Adams. Nowhere in his written submission of more than 4,000 words does he mention Boucher. Fumisa Ngqele, an advocate assisting Ntsebeza, interrupted Adams as he was about to move on to the section of his testimony that dealt with his coaching career to say: “Mr Adams, may I just interject there. When Mark Boucher called you ‘brown shit’, did you ever address him personally?” Adams’ reply was that he had not taken up the issue with Boucher, and that “Mark was probably just one of the guys” who used the offensive term.

That doesn’t change the fact that Boucher had a case to answer. But it does mean the SJN report can’t be trusted to make that case fairly and accurately. And that, with Adams saying he was satisfied with Boucher’s apology and would not testify at the disciplinary hearing, CSA’s case — already shaky when Enoch Nkwe, another potentially important witness, indicated he would also not appear at the hearing — was dead in the water.

CSA’s board, which it should be remembered inherited the SJN and its shoddy report from a previous board, did the right thing by pulling the plug. Just as they did the right thing by calling for the hearing in the first place: allegations of racist behaviour by an employee cannot be ignored. Those calling for heads to roll at board level either don’t live in the real world of due process, or they have an unfair axe to grind.     

There was more from Adams on July 22 last year, much of it heavy with wisdom and meaning: “I’m highlighting that it should never happen. And if we take this forward in the right manner we will have a lot more respect for each other. Maybe he should come and say sorry. Maybe that is all that needs to happen. But it should not be brushed under the carpet. If we want our teams within CSA to have the right ethic, the right mentality, the right respect for one another, we should air these things.

“No-one’s going to come here and sweep things under the carpet. That’s why I’ve built up the courage to actually come talk about it today. It’s taken a lot for me to be here and dig up some of these memories. I’ve felt a lot of emotion. We’re not here to break down the whole system. We’re here to build a better structure, a better way going forward.”

Sadly, the SJN report is that dreaded carpet. Adams’ courage and emotion will be remembered for a long time, but it’s difficult not to feel that it has been wasted.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa spin to win

“I have an amazing core of players around me who understand me as a character and respect me as a player and a person.” – Dean Elgar

Telford Vice | St George’s Park

EVEN South Africa’s most myopic supporters would concede that Bangladesh did better this time. But not by much. At Kingsmead last Monday, they lost their last seven wickets in 55 minutes. At St George’s Park a week later, it took South Africa four minutes longer to claim those seven magnificently.

The visitors resumed on 27/3 and were rumbled for 80 in a second innings that lasted only 23.3 overs, making South Africa victors by 332 runs with an hour and a minute short of two days to spare to complete a 2-0 series triumph. Only three times in their 130 Tests have Bangladesh been bowled out for fewer runs, an ignominious list that includes their 53 in Durban.

Bangladesh have gone down in all eight Tests they have played in South Africa, five of them by an innings. Indeed, last week’s loss, by 220 runs, is their smallest margin of defeat in this country. But these two results will sting more than most because the visitors’ hopes would have been raised by their brilliant performance in the ODIs, where they stormed to two convincing wins to clinch the rubber. As it has turned out, all that that accomplished was to give them further to fall. Worse, not only did Bangladesh lose, they did so ignobly by trying to pin some of the blame for their dismal performance on the standard of the umpiring. 

But enough about them. South Africa’s untrammelled success in this series was difficult to imagine when, in the aftermath of the ODIs, they bid farewell to Kagiso Rabada, Marco Jansen, Lungi Ngidi, Anrich Nortjé, Rassie van der Dussen and Aiden Markram, who chose to play in the IPL instead.

Dean Elgar pleaded with them not to go, but now that South Africa have won without them, things seem to have changed. “I don’t know if those guys are going to be selected again; that’s out of my hands,” Elgar told a press conference on Monday. Mark Boucher concurred: “They did go to the IPL and vacate their spots.”

If CSA wanted to hatch some positive marketing about the episode, they could argue that they always knew there was a strong chance South Africa would be without their first-choice pace attack because of the IPL clash. Hence, the suits could have said, they put the matches on pitches where spin would dominate.

Not that many would have foreseen that Keshav Maharaj would loom quite so large over proceedings. Maharaj followed his 7/32 in the second innings at Kingsmead with 7/40 at St George’s Park, making him the only bowler in Test history to take seven wickets in the fourth innings of consecutive Tests. Invariably precise and bristling with intensity, he was close to unplayable in Gqeberha, where the pitch helped the ball turn and bounce more sharply than in Durban. So much so that Maharaj probably would also have been successful against significantly stronger opposition had they faced him in these conditions.    

Until Kingsmead, South Africa had never used only two bowlers to claim all 10 wickets in an innings. Now they’ve done it again. Simon Harmer was that other bowler, and a fine foil he made. Harmer bowls a brand of slow poison that deserves its own sub-category in player profiles: non-Asian attacking orthodox off-spin, which not long ago would have been an oxymoron.

Maharaj took 16 wickets at an average of 12.12 in the two matches, and Harmer 13 at 15.15. No other bowler claimed more than nine. Wiaan Mulder’s 12.00 was the only other average below 20, but he bowled just 17 overs in the series. Maharaj and Harmer bowled almost two-thirds of all South Africa’s overs in the rubber.

A disappointment for the home side was that they failed to convert any of the seven half-centuries they scored into centuries. Forty completed individual innings for South Africa have passed since Kyle Verreynne made 136 not out in Christchurch in February, his team’s most recent ton. Three of South Africa’s 50s against Bangladesh belonged to Elgar, the series’ leading runscorer, who said: “We need to notch up a few more hundreds. Our senior guys, when we get into good positions, we need to get to three figures. We know how much that means and how much pressure you put on the opposition that way. Our batting is the one negative area. We’re extremely aware of it and we’re working bloody hard to get those hundreds.”

Elgar has presided over seven victories in his nine Tests in charge since his appointment in March last year. South Africa were seventh in the World Test Championship standings when he took over. They are now second. A significant part of the credit for the turnaround belongs to their captain.

“Hopefully I’ve nailed down a style of play that we can all follow going forward,” Elgar said. “I like challenges, which is why I’m still playing Test cricket at nearly 35. I feel I’ve got a lot of good years left, maybe even my best years. I’m really enjoying it. I think if I was younger I may not have enjoyed it as much.

“If you’re playing good cricket and the results are going your way, it’s always going to ease the burden of captaincy. The last year has been extremely testing off the field, but I have an amazing core of players around me who understand me as a character and respect me as a player and a person. They understand the kind of cricket I want to play. Most of the senior guys have bought into it. We’re in a very special place, which makes me feel a lot happier about what I’m doing.”

Elgar’s next engagement as South Africa’s captain is in England in August. That’s also where his journey as a leader started in July 2017 when he stood in for Faf du Plessis, who was on paternity leave and missed the first Test of that series at Lord’s. England won by 211 runs inside four days.

“Lord’s got the better of me in that Test, because you are playing at Lord’s,” Elgar admitted. He’s a better captain now, England should know.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Maharaj mayhem bursts Bangladesh bubble

“I think about scoring a Test century every time I go out to bat.” – Keshav Maharaj

Telford Vice | St George’s Park

MARK Boucher wasn’t happy. “There’s no rhythm,” he said more than once, lacing his gripe with the odd expletive, as he conducted cordon catching practice between innings at St George’s Park on Saturday. “Let’s get some rhythm going!” And that’s an order, he didn’t have to say.

The sturdy figure of South Africa’s coach looked like a dark and stormy night in his navy blue team tracksuit, complete with matching cap and black sunglasses. He wore a catcher’s mitt on his left hand and held a bat in his right, and hit balls towards Rivash Gobind kneeling several metres away. Gobind guided catches behind him to Kyle Verreynne and Sarel Erwee — lightweight pads for his role as the short leg fielder snug under his whites — and Wiaan Mulder, who were lined up near the boundary at the Park Drive End.

Presently, Mulder left the scene to join the bowlers, who were gathered on an unused pitch in the middle. He was replaced by Keegan Petersen, who had hardly stepped into the breach when he leapt left, lithe as you like, to snare a fine catch. Most of Gobind’s fire was trained on Erwee, whose palms resounded with meaty slaps that were followed by his yelps of polite protest. He stuck it out for a good long while before giving way to Simon Harmer, who made an eager entrance and took his catches — as he did at Kingsmead — by using most of his body to envelope the ball, like a human baseball glove.

Maybe there wasn’t much rhythm, what with all the moving parts involved. But there was intensity. You could feel the electric snap, crackle, pop of anticipation rising from ground level. It’s in these moments, when players are preparing to give of their best, when they are fully focused but have nothing to gain if they do something special and nothing to lose if they get it wrong, when no-one’s counting runs and wickets and umpires aren’t watching, that the beauty of cricket is revealed.

But the bubble had to burst, and soon everyone was watching the real thing. And there they were: Verreynne with Erwee, Harmer and Mulder in a jagged line next to him, this time closer to the Duck Pond End, and Petersen in the gully. Something had to happen quickly otherwise the tension would surely swallow all concerned.

Mercifully, it did. With the fifth delivery of the innings, a ball that left Mahmudul Hasan Joy as he offered at it, Duanne Olivier found the outside edge. Erwee took the catch with a slap but not a yelp. In the sixth over, Lizaad Williams induced an iffy stroke from Najmal Hossain Shanto — iffy enough for the ball to plop to earth short of Erwee. 

Spin was introduced after nine overs in the shape of Harmer, and in his second over Tamim Iqbal squirted what might have been a catch past Petersen at slip. Immediately, Mulder was installed alongside Petersen. Four overs later, Tamim again got it wrong to Harmer. This time the ball flew wide of Mulder. Keshav Maharaj was in his third over when Mominul Haque opened the face as he defended, but even Petersen couldn’t claim the dipping catch.

By then, one of the day’s two transformative performances by South Africans was underway. Mulder, who had waited until the 108th over of Bangladesh’s first innings, when they had only three wickets standing, to be given a bowl, waited only 20 overs this time. With his fifth delivery he trapped Tamim in front with an inswinger that would have nailed leg stump. Mulder still hadn’t conceded a run when he did for Najmal in similar fashion. When another inswinger evaded Mominul’s bat and rapped the pads, Mulder had taken 3/5 in 30 balls.

Mulder spent much of the rest of the afternoon, when he wasn’t bowling, pulling off a decent impression of a trapeze artist as he flew this way and that to unerringly come up with the ball from close fielding positions. Walking back to his bowling mark he shows the classic symptoms of the over-thinker: downcast, furrowed brow; short, stubby, apparently uncertain steps. See him tear into the crease or turn something close to a somersault to intercept what may or may or not be a catch, and the contrast is shocking. It’s the difference between a penguin on land and in water.

The other performance that shaped the day for South Africa started midway through the morning session, when Maharaj took guard. Herewith ends the rumination of the subtleties of cricket, as attempted above. A cleaner, more ambitious hitter would be difficult to find, but sometimes his ambitions outstrip his abilities. This wasn’t one of those times. It took him five deliveries to sort himself out, and then he was off to the races with a flying cut off Khaled Ahmed for four. He hit four four and three sixes in reaching 50 off as many balls, getting there with an arching drive off Mehidy Hasan that boomed over the long-on boundary.

Maharaj’s 95-ball 84, his career-best score, shimmered with aggression in the gloom of a blustery autumnal day. It was ended when he took a swipe across the line to Taijul Islam to earn the lion-hearted left-arm spinner the fifth of his six wickets. “I think about scoring a Test century every time I go out to bat,” Maharaj said about his fourth half-century.

Soon South Africa were dismissed for 453, just the second time they have passed 450 in their last 19 Tests. It was a strange-looking scorecard, what with four scores of more than 50, no centuries, and with only Lizaad Williams and Duanne Olivier, numbers 10 and 11, not reaching 20. Only four times before in Test history have nine players made it to 20 in one innings, and not since 1979.

By stumps Bangladesh had lost half their wickets but were still 314 behind. The forecast for significant rain in the match has improved, and with Maharaj, Harmer and Mulder on song, South Africa would seem to have all their bowling bases covered. As for the conditions, as Maharaj said, “This pitch is turning more viciously than the one at Kingsmead.” With the wind now blowing from the east, bringing moisture from the sea, it’s also offering swing and seam movement. Unless you bat like Maharaj did, which the visitors haven’t shown much aptitude for so far, runs do not come easily.

Mark Boucher should be happy now.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

When Harmer met Bavuma

“There is a feeling of vindication after coming back.” – Simon Harmer

Telford Vice | Kingsmead

BEFORE you spare a thought for Temba Bavuma and his third trip into the 90s with only one century to show for his efforts, and that after 84 Test innings, consider Simon Harmer’s long walk back to freedom.

Bavuma delivered another masterclass at Kingsmead on Friday in how to steady a shaky innings. When he took guard in the 10th over after lunch on Thursday, South Africa had lost Dean Elgar and Sarel Erwee five deliveries apart. When he was bowled off his pads for 93 in the eighth over before lunch on Friday by a ripping turner from Mehidy Hasan, the home side were 298/7.

Bavuma batted for almost five hours and shared half-century stands with Kyle Verreynne and Keshav Maharaj. He was the difference between a mediocre total and South Africa’s 367. Just nine times in the 45 Tests at this ground has the first innings of the match been bigger.

Bavuma’s performance was cause for celebration, if not relief, for South Africans. Only cricket’s warped logic mislabels his innings a “tragedy” because he didn’t score seven more runs. And, among South Africa’s players, only Bavuma labours under this kind of unfair scrutiny because he hasn’t made more centuries. It’s a lazy, knee-jerk argument because citing the number of times he has nursed a swooning innings to respectability is less straightforward than counting hundreds, and thus rarely highlighted.

So the bean counters will be interested to know that 2,278 days have passed since Bavuma last scored a Test century. What might they make of the fact that, by stumps on Thursday, 2,316 days had gone by since Harmer last took a Test wicket? 

In that time, Harmer featured in 86 first-class matches in which he bowled more than 20,000 deliveries and took 426 wickets for Essex, the Warriors and the Titans. But none for South Africa. Because, owing to the Kolpak status he took in 2016, he could not play for them.

He was a major factor in the county championship titles Essex won in 2017 and 2019, and captained them to triumph in the 2019 T20 Blast. A year earlier, he had helped the Jozi Stars’ win the Mzansi Super League. This summer, his 44 wickets at 19.29 made him the leading wicket-taker in the first-class competition for the champion Titans. Harmer was already a good bowler when he went to England. He has returned significantly closer to the finished article; a man in full.

He was picked in the squad for two Tests in New Zealand in February, but knew he had little chance of playing. His chance came at Kingsmead, and he took it. Harmer claimed all the wickets as Bangladesh shambled to 98/4 in reply at stumps on the second day — still 269 runs behind. 

“Essex gave me the platform to find myself again,” Harmer told a press conference. I’d gone there on the back of being dropped from the South African team and the A side, and not knowing if I was going to get another franchise contract. I had a lot of self-doubt, and Essex gave me the opportunity to rediscover what made me successful; learning to be a matchwinner for them and getting comfortable with that role. The more I did it the more I started to believe. That has added a lot to my game, knowing that I can win games as an orthodox off-spinner.”

Not only did Harmer bowl like a winner for his haul of 4/42, he also batted like one in his career-best 38 not out in which he shared stands of 34 and 35 with Lizaad Williams and Duanne Olivier. “I don’t think I could have scripted a better day,” Harmer said. Would he have preferred a half-century or a five-wicket haul? “My bowling puts bread on the table, so I think a five-for.”

The now concluded Kolpak era was a lightning rod for controversy, chiefly about the reasons for South Africa’s player drain. Less often acknowledged is that county cricket has the resources to allow players to reach their potential, which in many cases is beyond the impoverished South African domestic game. After days like Harmer had on Friday, South Africa and their supporters should be grateful for Kolpak. Had Harmer felt as if he had shut up the detractors who said he was only interested in making money?

“There was a lot of media about how lucrative playing county cricket is,” he said. “For me, it was about opportunity. I was only playing one format for the Warriors when I left. I went [to Essex] and played all three formats. I was painted with the same brush as [other Kolpak players], which is fine. But currency is wickets and performances and winning games of cricket and trophies. And that’s all I put my blinkers on and tried to achieve. There is a feeling of vindication after coming back.

“There’s also still questions: am I good enough to play international cricket? I’ve done it for Essex, I’ve come back to the Titans and taken wickets there. Am I still good enough for international cricket? Four wickets doesn’t mean I am. But putting in a performance, just for my own self-belief, has been good.”

That performance unspooled under Durban’s grey skies and Kingsmead’s glowing floodlights, which was why 40 of the 49 overs the Bangladeshis faced were bowled by Harmer, Maharaj and Elgar. No seamer was given the ball after the 10th over.

Those aren’t the only unusual truths for a Test match in South Africa. Another is that Bavuma and Harmer have taken different routes to Kingsmead, paths that in a different reality may never have crossed. That they are both here, both in the thick of things, and both contributing to the cause, is a thing to treasure. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa’s suddenly serious series

“I’m comfortable where I sit with the players who aren’t here.” – Dean Elgar on South Africa’s IPL absentees.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

DEAN Elgar joked in December that South Africa’s players didn’t know who their administrators were, a comment on cricket’s chronic instability in the country. Now he might have to admit to something similar about the attack he will take into the Test series against Bangladesh.

The defection to the IPL of Kagiso Rabada, Anrich Nortjé, Lungi Ngidi and Marco Jansen takes 82 Test caps out of the mix. It also removes some of the game’s finest quicks from the equation. For instance, no-one has taken more Test wickets this year than the 23 claimed by Rabada, Jansen and Pat Cummins. Add the omission of Rassie van der Dussen and Aiden Markram, who are also IPL-bound, and the excised experience grows to 128 caps.

Suddenly, Duanne Olivier and Lutho Sipamla are South Africa’s senior fast bowlers. Also in the squad are Lizaad Williams, Glenton Stuurman and Daryn Dupavillon, as well as Ryan Rickelton and Khaya Zondo. Olivier, Sipamla and Stuurman have played 17 Tests between them. Dupavillon, Williams, Rickelton and Zondo are uncapped.

Elgar is in the same sorry situation as the head chef at a top class restaurant who arrives in the kitchen to discover their best knives have been stolen and their sous and pastry chefs have eloped. Except that he has known for weeks that this might happen, and had his fears confirmed before the squad was announced on March 17.

“A lot of events have happened since my last interview around this very topic,” Elgar told a press conference on Monday, with reference to the impassioned plea he made on March 4 for his players to choose country over cash. “I’m comfortable where I sit with the players who aren’t here. I’ve had some really good, in detail chats with those players just to find out where they are mentally. I’m very comfortable with the answers that they’ve given me.

“Be that as it may, they’re not here with us and we have to make do with our next best that we have in the country, who I’m still very confident in. Yes, we’ve lost a few Test caps along the way not having the IPL players with us, but it’s a great opportunity for those guys to stand up and put those other players under pressure. I’m confident they can do that.”

Elgar’s tone was significantly more subdued compared to the passion he showed almost four weeks ago, when he said “we’ll see where [the players’] loyalty lies” and implored them not to “forget that Test and one-day cricket got them into the IPL, not the other way around”.

Pholetsi Moseki, CSA’s acting chief executive, expressed surprise at the time that Elgar had told the press the players had been saddled with the choice of going to the IPL or staying on for the Test series. Had Elgar been told to rein himself in?

“I’m pretty confined with regards to what I can and can’t say,” Elgar said on Monday. “The players were put in a bit of a situation with regards to making themselves available. I’m sure they wouldn’t have made a rash decision if it didn’t mean a hell of a lot to them. I’ve had conversations with the players and I know where they stand with regards to the Test side and playing Test cricket. I think they were put in a situation that was unavoidable, bearing in mind that quite a few of the guys have never had IPL experience before. I don’t think they wanted to hurt their opportunity going forward in the competition.”

It was a strange comment considering, of the six absentees, only Van der Dussen has not been to the IPL before; albeit Markram has played only six games in the tournament and Jansen just two. But there is something to be said for players’ not creating doubt over their availability in the minds of IPL franchise owners. The amount of money they could earn in a single edition of cricket’s moneyed monster could change their lives in a way that dutifully turning out for the national team, year in and year out, cannot match.

That alone decides the debate about the choice they made, but damaging misinformation about how they came to be lumped with that decision has muddied the discussion at public level. It is true that, with regard to being given permission to feature in the IPL rather than for South Africa if dates clash, the IPL is the only franchise tournament specified in the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between CSA and the South African Cricketers’ Association. It is not true that the MOU guarantees players clearance to go to the IPL ahead of being picked for South Africa. CSA retain the right to refuse to issue any player an NOC, or no objection certificate, for any tournament including the IPL. But CSA can hardly afford to do so in the case of cricket’s biggest payday. That could prompt retirements from the international game — the savvy thing to do, financially speaking. So compromises are made.

On the plus side for Elgar, South Africa will welcome back Keegan Petersen, the leading runscorer in the home series against India in December and January who missed the tour to New Zealand in January and February after contracting Covid. Petersen’s grit will be important in a team who consider recovering some of the prestige lost in the home side’s shock loss to the Bangladeshis in the one-day series as part of their mission. That’s the case even though Temba Bavuma, Kyle Verreynne and Keshav Maharaj are the only members of the ODI squad who will be in the Test dressing room.

“I think what happened in the ODI series has hurt quite a lot of players,” Elgar said. “I wasn’t involved but I’m pretty hurt about the result. I’d like to think that’s fuelled us. Our hunger is going to be right up there.”

But Elgar recognised that the visitors, who lost all 19 of the completed matches they played against South Africa in South Africa before this tour, were a significantly improved team: “We know this Bangladesh side is not the one of old. They’re a new team with a westernised coaching staff who have changed their mindset with regards to how to play cricket in South Africa.” Russell Domingo, South Africa’s coach from August 2013 to August 2017, heads a Bangladesh coaching cohort that includes compatriot Allan Donald and Australians Jamie Siddons and Shane McDermott. 

Given the slant of the one-day series, in which the home side conceded they were outplayed in all departments despite the fact that the matches were staged in Centurion and at the Wanderers — venues where conditions are overtly South African, and so distinctly un-Asian — did Elgar look forward to the Tests unspooling more slowly at Kingsmead and St George’s Park?

He seemed irked by the suggestion: “Not really. I still think our best Test cricket is played on the Highveld. I’ve got no say over scheduling and venues. Hopefully in the future that can change, but I’d still be extremely happy to play against these guys on the Highveld. I don’t think we’ve got any fear about that. We play our best brand of cricket in that area.

“But even though we’re playing in conditions that are lower and slower, we can adapt. I’ll play them anywhere. I’ve played against mighty cricket nations on really tough surfaces on the Highveld, and we’ve had a lot of success out of that. I’m not too fazed about us playing on slower or quicker wickets. I just think we need to nail down our basics again. That doesn’t change from venue to venue.”

It doesn’t, but South Africa’s failure to launch at two of their fortresses and Bangladesh’s stellar performance must prompt a rethink. The visitors’ Test squad includes seven of their ODI heroes, notably Tamim Iqbal, Taskin Ahmed and Mehidy Hasan. And it should sharpen the home side’s focus that the series will be played at the same grounds where Sri Lanka won 2-0 in February 2019 — the only Test series victory by an Asian side in South Africa.

Will Kingsmead, where the rubber starts on Thursday, again prove itself as reasonable a facsimile of a subcontinental pitch as can be found on the sharp tip of Africa? “We want more grass on the pitch, and I think the preparation has been pretty good until now,” Elgar said. “I’m not too familiar with what they’ve done, but it seems like grass has grown a little bit here at Kingsmead. I think it helps if you put water on the pitch because that tends to make grass grow.”

Yes, that was another of Elgar’s jokes. No, he wasn’t laughing. There is too much at stake for that. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Bavuma gets down to business

“You never want to make the work much harder for yourself, and that’s what seems to be happening.” – Kagiso Rabada on South Africa’s unhappy habit of losing series openers.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

TWO South Africa spinners! In an ODI! At the Wanderers! Actually, that’s not as rare as we might think. Including Sunday’s match against Bangladesh, the 38th in the format South Africa have played at this venue, they’ve deployed a pair of slow poisoners 11 times. That’s exactly as often as they haven’t bowled any spin in a Wanderers ODI, and five fewer times than they’ve deployed a lone tweaker.

So what? It’s a way into the unchained algorithm of factors that added layers of narrative to an unusually complex white-ball match; a contest that kept on giving. Events didn’t look like unspooling that interestingly when twitchy, trigger happy Bangladesh, no doubt looking to build on the 314/7 they scored in their triumph in Centurion on Friday, crashed to 34/5 inside 13 fateful overs on a pitch that didn’t often allow what seemed identical deliveries to behave the same way.

By then, Kagiso Rabada had taken 3/15 in six sniping overs, and Lungi Ngidi and Wayne Parnell had also struck in a significantly more successful new-ball burst than South Africa had enjoyed on Friday — when Tamim Iqbal and Litton Das shared 95 in an opening stand that endured into the 22nd over. Could the contrast between Friday and Sunday be ascribed entirely to the starkly different conditions?

“That’s the question I’m still asking myself,” Rabada told a press conference. “I thought we bowled very well in the first 10 overs in the previous game. We just couldn’t get a breakthrough. Generally at the Wanderers there’s a bit more bounce, and the cracks came into play initially. I’d say we got the ball in the right areas, as we did in Centurion, and the Wanderers was good to us.”

Given that kind of start, the visitors would be rattled out for around 100 and South Africa would cruise to a series-levelling win with a match to play and plenty of sunshine left in the day, surely. Too many ODIs are indeed that predictable, particularly when they’re played by men. Happily, Sunday’s wasn’t in that sad category.

The world turned on the fifth ball of the 15th over, when Parnell pulled up with a hamstring injury as he landed from his leap to bowl what would have been the last delivery of his third. Now what, considering South Africa had picked only five recognised bowlers?

Fast forward 33 overs to the start of the 49th, which was delivered by someone who hadn’t been asked to mark out a run up in any of his previous 82 matches for South Africa across the formats. In 398 first-class, list A and senior T20 matches, he had sent down fewer than 100 overs. And with his second ball on Sunday, frontline batter Rassie van der Dussen and his hardly ever spotted off-spin had Shoriful Islam caught on the long-on boundary. Apologies: allrounder Rassie van der Dussen. “He’ll definitely be throwing those remarks around the changeroom, 100%,” Rabada said with a smile. “He’s going to be asking for the ball.” All good, but how did we get here?

Until Parnell limped off, the presence in the XI of Tabraiz Shamsi as well as Keshav Maharaj had been all but moot. With Bangladesh reduced to 47/5 before either had turned their arms over, what was going to be left for them to do? Would they even be required to bowl? But that, of course, was no longer a relevant discussion. 

Temba Bavuma completed Parnell’s over, and on came Shamsi. Bavuma continued with his whippy medium pace, and while South Africa didn’t make further inroads in the 9.1 overs he bowled in tandem with Shamsi before Maharaj relieved his captain, the home side conceded just 32 runs in that time. Box ticked. 

Not quite: three of Parnell’s quota of overs still needed to be allocated. Bavuma’s first spell of 4.1 in which he limited the damage to 16 made him the prime candidate for the task, and there was no surprise when he returned 15 overs later. At least, there was no surprise from the distance of the boundary. “I needed a lot of convincing [to bowl],” Bavuma said in a television interview. “I might have to go see a chiropractor tomorrow.”

Rabada corroborated that: “[Bavuma] does bowl sometimes in the nets, especially when we’re playing Test cricket. But he’s stopped doing that because I think he realises how tough it is, and the next morning he’s got aches and pains which he’s always talking about. He’s actually a surprisingly decent bowler. He did a stellar job.”

Indeed, he did. But Bavuma will see more medics than just a chiro before the deciding match of the series in Centurion on Wednesday. At the end of the second over of his later spell — the last ball he would need to bowl — he injured a finger trying, and failing, to take a hard-hit return catch offered by Afif Hossain. He left the field and returned with his finger heavily strapped, and said he would undergo a scan in the coming days.

Bangladesh recovered to 194/9, thanks to Afif Hossain — who took guard on that precipice of 34/5 — standing firm in stands of 60 and 86 with Mahmudullah and Mehidy Hasan. They were able to do so partly because Maharaj wasn’t able to maintain the pressure that had been built earlier. His return of 0/57 marked only the fifth time in the 20 ODIs in which he has bowled that he has not taken a wicket. It was also his second-most expensive spell of 10 overs.

But, in the context of the match, that was hardly crucial. Rabada removed Afif and Mehidy in the space of three deliveries in the 46th over — his last — to finish with 5/39, his second five-wicket haul in his 82nd ODI bowling innings.

Rabada’s talent, skill and intelligence helped South Africa nail down victory by seven wickets in 37.2 overs. Quinton de Kock’s belligerent 41-ball 62, the opening stand of 86 he shared with Janneman Malan, and the 82 Bavuma put on with Kyle Verreynne — who made a sturdy unbeaten 58 — were also key. It was an impressive performance with bat, ball and, not least, Bavuma’s management of an on-field crisis — which looked set to deepen Ngidi’s status became a concern after he took knocks to the knee and the ankle in the field, noticeably impacting the threat he posed with the ball. But the comeback also came a game too late, and not for the first time.

South Africa have lost the opening match of a completed rubber 11 times in their last 14 series regardless of formats and including last year’s T20 World Cup in the UAE. They have bounced back to win six of those series, while losing six and drawing two. Better beginnings could rewrite that equation

“Resilience is a big thing for us, but you want to start a series well,” Bavuma said. “It’s not ideal having to claw your way back.” Rabada concurred: “It is a concern, because you always want to throw the first punch. It’s something we do talk about, but we keep finding ourselves in this position. You never want to make the work much harder for yourself, and that’s what seems to be happening. We don’t do it on purpose. It’s an area we need to try and figure out.”

If the answer to that question had been easy to find, it would have been by now.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.