Nortjé’s absence conspicuous on CSA contract list

Only Kagiso Rabada has taken more test and ODI wickets during Anrich Nortjé’s career. Yet CSA have not contracted Nortjé.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

QUINTON de Kock, Dean Elgar, Sisanda Magala, Wayne Parnell and Keegan Petersen were not on the list of contracted men’s players CSA announced on Tuesday. Fair enough, in every instance. But the case of Anrich Nortjé, who also wasn’t named, raises questions.

De Kock, an all-format star until December 2021, now plays only T20Is. Test specialist Elgar has retired. Magala and Parnell each featured in only seven of South Africa’s 33 white-ball matches last year, and Petersen in just two of their four Tests.

Nortjé, also an all-format performer, appeared in only nine of those 37 games. But that was due to a lumbar stress fracture that kept him out of action from September 10 last year to March 7 this year.

At 30 he is in the prime of his career and among the fastest and most effective bowlers in the game. From his Test and ODI debuts in October and March 2019 only Kagiso Rabada has taken more wickets for South Africa in those formats, and none of Nortjé’s current teammates have a better T20I economy rate.

Nortjé returned to action in three matches for Eastern Province in the ongoing CSA T20 Challenge, the last two of them five days apart. He bowled all four of his overs in each game and kept a tidy enough economy rate of 6.83, and joined Delhi Capitals following the birth of his and his wife Micaela Nortjé’s first child last Tuesday.

If Nortjé is fit enough for most of what will be a gruelling IPL campaign — he missed Delhi’s first match on Saturday to be with his newly enlarged family — why isn’t he fit enough to be recontracted by CSA? Because, it seems, he wants to carefully manage the rest of his career.

Cricbuzz understands Nortjé has told CSA he wants to concentrate on T20 cricket — franchise and international — for most of this year before extending himself to ODIs by the end of 2024. That’s understandable for someone who missed the 2019 IPL and has been ruled out of the last two World Cups by injuries. Test cricket? We may have seen the last of Nortjé in whites. But, importantly, he has not retired from the international arena.

So the T20 World Cup in the Caribbean and the United States in June remains on his radar. The tournament is likely to be De Kock’s swansong in a South Africa shirt. That’s if he cracks the selectorial nod. De Kock scored a 44-ball 100 in a T20I against West Indies in Centurion in March last year, but in 24 subsequent innings in the format — for South Africa, Lucknow Super Giants, Melbourne Renegades and Durban’s Super Giants — he has passed 50 only twice, and been dismissed for three ducks and six other single-figure scores. He knows he has work to do to make the T20 World Cup squad.

Kyle Verreynne and David Bedingham could consider themselves unlucky not to be contracted. Verreynne scored consistently in the SA20 and the domestic first-class competition, and Bedingham’s 110 in Hamilton was among the few positives of South Africa’s Test series in New Zealand in February. Nandré Burger and Tony de Zorzi are the new faces among the 18 — down from last year’s 20 — who have landed contracts. There was good news for Andile Phehlukwayo, who is back in the centrally paid ranks despite playing for South Africa only six times in 2023.

There wasn’t as much to report from the women’s list, which increased by one to 16 players. Ayanda Hlubi and Eliz-Mari Marx have signed up and the only notable absence is that of Shabnim Ismail, who has retired.

CSA contracted players for 2024/25:

Men: Temba Bavuma, Nandré Burger, Gerald Coetzee, Tony de Zorzi, Bjorn Fortuin, Reeza Hendricks, Marco Jansen, Heinrich Klaasen, Keshav Maharaj, Aiden Markram, David Miller, Lungi Ngidi, Andile Phehlukwayo, Kagiso Rabada, Ryan Rickelton, Tabraiz Shamsi, Tristan Stubbs, Rassie van der Dussen.

Women: Anneke Bosch, Tazmin Brits, Nadine de Klerk, Lara Goodall, Ayanda Hlubi, Sinalo Jafta, Marizanne Kapp, Ayabonga Khaka, Masabata Klaas, Suné Luus, Eliz-Mari Marx, Nonkululeko Mlaba, Tumi Sekhukhune, Chloé Tryon, Delmi Tucker, Laura Wolvaardt.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Lions v WP still intense despite Tests, T20, and bungling suits 

“If we can find a way to win under the circumstances we face at Western Province it will slowly creep into the admin side. We’ve managed to get a title sponsor now, and that’s on the back of a lot of strong performances from us as players.” – Kyle Verreynne

Telford Vice / Cape Town

THE last time a men’s team based at Newlands won South Africa’s senior first-class competition, the captain who will lead Western Province in the final this week wasn’t old enough to legally drink, vote, or drive a car.

How long ago was it? Far enough in the past that the competition had a title sponsor, a privilege it hasn’t enjoyed for the past six seasons. Eleven of the 22 players in the deciding match, in Bloemfontein, where the Cobras beat the Knights by 10 wickets, have since retired from serious cricket.

It was February 2013, when Kyle Verreynne was 15. Now 26, he will captain WP against the Lions at the Wanderers from Wednesday in a final that has been scheduled for five days. Unusually for this competition the game will be broadcast live on television, albeit to SuperSport’s limited audience. Also unusual is that the match is a final — only once in the past 18 seasons, in 2020/21, have the league standings not decided the champions.   

Verreynne plans to break the trophy drought for a team who have won 34 of the various versions of South Africa’s senior first-class title — considering all sides of the racial divide during apartheid — and shared four. The Lions, formerly Transvaal, then Gauteng, have been champions 29 times, most recently in 2019/20, and joint-winners five times.

Inevitably the match will be cast as a clash of cultures as well as cricket; the uptight north versus the laidback south, Joburg’s can-do attitude against Cape Town’s creativity. There’s more fiction than fact to that, not least because the Lions’ squad harbours Zubayr Hamza and Bjorn Fortuin — who are from the Cape — and that Tony de Zorzi and Nandré Burger — Gautengers both — will be in WP’s dressingroom.

But it is true that during South Africa’s apartheid-induced isolation from the international arena, from 1970 to 1991, games between teams representing the white Transvaal and WP structures assumed the trappings of the Tests those players could no longer play. Apartheid barred black and brown cricketers from playing for South Africa for far longer than their white counterparts were shut out, but the Transvaal-WP rivalry was also strong in those quarters during the 1950s and 60s. Although WP subsequently became too strong for all their opponents, Eastern Province ran them close in the 1980s.

Had South Africa’s return to the international fold taken the edge off the fixture, especially as Test cricket is supposed to deliver a higher quality of cricket? Verreynne balked at that assertion during a press conference on Tuesday: “I wouldn’t say there’s a reduction in standard. Maybe the intensity is lower and the pressure is less than in international cricket. But from our team alone there are probably eight guys who could play international cricket and I’m sure it’s the same for them.” Verreynne is one of the dozen players among the 28 in both squads who have earned Test caps.  

Dominic Hendricks, Verreynne’s Lions counterpart, didn’t think too much had changed: “During the four-day competition this year it was a hotly contested game in which we came out victors. Last season at the Wanderers it was a very close game that went down to the last session on the last day. It’s always been a highly competitive fixture.” The Lions won by 106 runs in November and by 28 runs in Johannesburg in February and March last year.

Even the rise of T20, Hendricks said, hadn’t dulled his and his players’ desire to claim the first-class title: “A lot of attention has shifted to the SA20 because of the influence the IPL owners have had on our game, and also how T20 cricket has taken over the world in terms of the leagues. Unfortunately it’s come at a cost because we don’t get as many four-day games as we used to. But this is the one competition we want to win, and we’ve spoken about wanting to win since we last won it. So we put a high price on this competition because it is the most difficult one to win. You have to be so consistent over the course of seven or eight games.”

If there are contending cricket philosophies in Johannesburg and Cape Town, they are more easily seen off the field. Under Jono Leaf-Wright, the Lions chief executive since October 2018, Gauteng have become one of the most successful provinces in a business sense. The Wanderers has been a drive-in cinema and the pressbox has been used as a space for lectures, for example.

Cricket there faces similar financial pressures as elsewhere in the country. But it has come up with solutions in a way that hasn’t happened at Newlands — where the disaster of the pitch prepared by a part-time curator for the Test against India last month, which hurtled to a finish in a world record 642 deliveries, is only the most glaring evidence of deep-rooted administrative problems. 

“It’s been tough in the past but when Salieg [Nackerdien, WP’s coach] appointed me fulltime at the start of the season one of my biggest messages was that as the players and the management we’ve got to find ways to keep our circle small and make sure we focus on what we can control,” Verreynne said. “It’s easy to look outwards and say there are issues with whatever is going on outside of the players and management, but that’s an excuse. If you rock up to training every day and you focus on getting your work down there isn’t any excuse for not performing.

“At the start of the season we sat down as a squad and said we’re going to make sure that we focus on the cricket and make sure that the cricket stays the main thing. If we can find a way to win games and win trophies under the circumstances that we face at Western Province then it will not only help us grow but slowly creep into the admin side. We’ve managed to get a title sponsor now, and that’s on the back of a lot of strong performances from us as players.”

Verreynne’s team have indeed shown the suits the way. Hendricks and his men will do their best to make sure they don’t do so again over the next five days. Don’t expect anything less than the most intense of contests.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Kane king as South Africa limp back to SA20-land

“He doesn’t leave his bubble. He just stays there, he just focuses on the next ball. He really respects the game.” – Neil Brand on Kane Williamson

Telford Vice / Cape Town

AT least it was Kane Williamson who administered the last rites. If you have to lose a Test and be lumped with an unwanted record that you have avoided for almost 92 years, rather the nicest man in cricket delivers the killer blows than some smug aggressor.

Williamson’s undefeated 133 at Seddon Park on Friday, his third century in four innings and his seventh in a dozen trips to the crease, clinched what New Zealand had never achieved from their first meeting with these opponents in February and March 1932 — victory in a men’s Test series against South Africa.

Having been outplayed and thumped, by 281 runs, in the first Test in Mount Maunganui, the South Africans — significantly weakened by SA20 contractual commitments — proved more competitive in Hamilton. With Dane Piedt taking 5/89 in the first innings, which earned South Africa a lead of 31, and David Bedingham scoring 110 in the second dig, hopes rose of a fairytale win. But a crash of 6/33 after tea on Thursday, starring Will O’Rourke, whose match figures of 9/93 are the best by a New Zealand debutant, trimmed the target to 267. Williamson and Will Young took New Zealand home by seven wickets in the last hour of Friday’s play with an unbroken stand of 152.

“We were in a really good position [on Thursday] afternoon to put the Black Caps under real pressure,” Shukri Conrad said. “At tea time we were 217 ahead for four, and we could have batted out the day and part of today. But we felt we posted something that could be competitive. But when the No. 1-ranked batter in the world plays the way he does, I don’t think we can be too disappointed about the outcome of the match.”

Williamson batted for more than six hours and faced 260 balls for his 32nd Test century, the first of them scored on debut in Ahmedabad in November 2010. His latest feat was a patient march to a victory that became more inexorable with each passing, flawless minute that Williamson occupied the crease. In the series he scored more than 100 runs than anyone else and faced five deliveries short of double the number dealt with by Bedingham, South Africa’s leading batter in the rubber.

“You just watch and marvel at the way he goes about his business,” Conrad said. “If there are any learnings for our young bucks and our more experienced guys to take away it’s how he wanted to be there right at the end and almost pull out the stumps and say thank you very much. He’s a glutton for batting. It was an absolute masterclass. I sit here in the hope that our players watched and saw how to best go about it.”

Neil Brand saw Williamson’s innings up close: “He doesn’t leave his bubble. He just stays there, he just focuses on the next ball. He really respects the game, from what I have seen. He never throws his wicket away and he is always hungry to bat. A lot of us can learn from that.”

What could Tim Southee do but heap praise on the man from whom he inherited the captaincy in December 2022: “He is a special talent. It wasn’t an easy pitch to bat on and he just found a way. We knew if someone could stick with him and he showed us his brilliance, it was going to make things easier. He was tested with spin and pace and a challenging pitch, but we’ve seen over the years he has come out on top. After the 12 months he has had with injuries and setbacks and rehabs and coming back, it’s just phenomenal to see him be able to do what he does. 

“He gets into his batting bubble and I guess it’s his happy place. We joke that he doesn’t like spending time with us, that he’d rather spend it out in the middle. But it’s just pure hunger for batting — his pure love for batting, not only in the middle but the time he spends in the nets.

“He is always looking to improve his game. It’s no fluke that he is as good as he is because he trains as hard as anyone I have ever seen. He hits more balls than anyone I have ever seen, and he just gets into that zone and is a guy you want in your team. For over 10 years he has been an incredible member of the side and one of our greats. And there’s still more to come.”

The South Africans were left to pick up the pieces of what might have been had they shown more application when they batted on Thursday, but they knew the superior team won. “The only time you are allowed to lose is when the opposition are better than you, and they certainly were better than us,” Conrad said. As a consolation, Brand had the certainty that “you know it’s possible to play at this level”.

He should count himself lucky he isn’t part of South Africa’s women’s team, who are staring at a defeat of biblical proportions after two days of a one-off Test at the Waca. They were shot out for 76 in 6.2 overs more than a session with Darcie Brown taking 5/21, then toiled for 125.2 overs before Australia declared at 575/9. Annabel Sutherland’s 210 was the fourth double century scored in the 148 women’s Tests played. By stumps on Friday, South Africa had lost their top order and were still 432 behind. The fact that Australia are playing their ninth Test in 10 years and South Africa only their second goes some way to illustrating the disparity between the teams, but that won’t make the visitors feel better about their impending thrashing.

South Africa’s teams will make long journeys home to a cricketminded public who will look at them with a mixture of pity, dissatisfaction and concern. Even allowing for the extenuating circumstances, how could they have performed so poorly? What will these results do to their collective psyche? Why should they take an interest in all that when they could suspend their disbelief and pour their passion into something as frivolous and inconsequential as T20 tournaments?

Like the SA20. It’s a fair bet South Africans have forgotten what happened in the final at Newlands on Saturday, much less in the rest of this year’s tournament. And that’s the point: it’s cricket for cricket’s — and money’s — sake. There is no overarching seriousness to get in the way of the fun, and there are no memories — good or bad — to linger into the succeeding days and weeks. Everyone goes home happy. Who won? Who cares? Even so, T20 shines with an incandescent brightness when the international game ebbs as low as it does in South Africa. And especially when a tournament shows provable progress, as the SA20 has done.

Of the 34 matches just 12 were decided by 10 or fewer runs or with no more than six balls to spare. But that was three more games than last year, and close finishes are not a genuine measure of the quality of the cricket played — two weak teams could contest the tightest match as readily as two strong sides.

Four centuries were scored in this year’s SA20 compared to three in 2023. No players made aggregates of 400 or more last year. This year there were four. This season’s leading runscorer was Ryan Rickelton with 530 in 10 innings. Last summer no-one could catch Jos Buttler’s 391 in 11.

Heinrich Klaasen’s 37 sixes in 2024 was almost double Will Jacks’ league-leading 19 in the first edition. Three players reached 50 off 19 balls in 2023. Klaasen got there in 16 this year. Jacks’ 41-ball century in 2024 beat Klaasen’s effort off 43 deliveries a year ago.

Last year’s highest score was Faf du Plessis’ 113. This year Kyle Verreynne made 116 not out. The biggest stand in 2023 was 157 shared by Reeza Hendricks and Du Plessis. Rassie van der Dussen and Rickelton piled up a partnership of 200 in 2024. 

There were a dozen hauls of four wickets or more this year. Last year? Eight. Three of 2024’s best bowling figures were five-fours. We saw one in 2023. 

Not all of the metrics point upward. Twenty has been the magic number for most wickets by a bowler in both editions. Anrich Nortjé’s 142 dot balls last year bettered Daniel Worrall’s 124 this year.

But there is no doubt the tournament is flexing its muscles as it grows. If it continues on that trajectory how long might it be before the SA20, with all its fizz regardless of who does what and none of the funk that falls when South Africa lose, replaces the international game as this country’s cricket of choice?

  • Australia won the Waca Test by an innings and 284 runs on Saturday.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Conrad revolution elevates Bavuma

“I get paid to make certain calls and subjectivity plays a part.” – Shukri Conrad, South Africa Test coach

Telford Vice / Cape Town

CHANGE continued to sweep through South Africa’s structures on Friday, when Temba Bavuma replaced Dean Elgar as captain of a Test squad that included neither of the side’s only century-makers last year.

One of them was Kyle Verreynne, who was the team’s second-highest run-scorer in Australia in December and January. He will give way as first-choice wicketkeeper to Heinrich Klaasen. Sarel Erwee — the other South African century-maker in 2022 — Rassie van der Dussen, Khaya Zondo, Lungi Ngidi and Glenton Stuurman also failed to crack the nod, and Theunis de Bruyn retired from international cricket on Thursday.

The squad of 15, picked to play West Indies in two matches in Centurion and at the Wanderers in February and March, features Tony de Zorzi for the first time. Keegan Petersen returns from a hamstring injury that forced him out of the series in Australia, and Aiden Markram, Ryan Rickelton, Wiaan Mulder and Senuran Muthusamy are back in favour. 

Last month came the news that bowling coach Charl Langeveldt would join Punjab Kings, and it was first reported last week — and repeated in the press on Friday — that JP Duminy was being lined up to replace batting coach Justin Sammons.

Outside the dressing room, the selection chief has been sacked. Or, in the floury words of a CSA release, they had “decided to release Victor Mpitsang of his role”. The other selector, Patrick Moroney, will in future be confined to under-19 duty. For now at least, squads and teams will be picked by Test coach Shukri Conrad and his white-ball counterpart, Rob Walter, with input from the captains. Conrad and Walter are themselves new arrivals having been appointed last month to replace Mark Boucher.

Conrad made plain at a press conference on Friday that he had sparked most of the playing personnel revolution. Here he is on the leadership reboot: “Dean’s done an exceptional job over the last couple of years, and in my conversation with him that’s something I made clear. This was my decision. Dean’s still going to play a huge part in our leadership group. This doesn’t make Dean a poor captain and Temba a good captain. But I felt this was the right fit for me and for us going forward.”

There was plenty more straight talk where that came from. Here’s Conrad on Markram, who has gone 15 Test innings without reaching 50: “People are always going to be behind Aiden Markram or they are going to say he flatters to deceive. I’m in the former group. Aiden’s going to open the batting. He’s a wonderful cricketer and a strokeplayer. Aiden and I go back a long way, so I know his character. We’ve got to match characters to that to our selections and the type of cricket we want to play. I say emphatically that he will open the batting with Dean.”

And on Verreynne’s axing: “Ultimately I get paid to make certain calls and subjectivity plays a part. That was my conversation with Kyle. He’s done everything that can be expected. But I think ‘Klaasie’ has done more and deserves a full crack. ‘Klaasie’ is, in my opinion, not just a batter that we can stick in the field. I’ve always viewed him as a wicketkeeper-batter, so for me it was a straight shootout as to who I wanted. And that’s ‘Klaasie’. That’s unfortunate on someone like Kyle.”

And on the uncapped Gerald Coetzee’s retention, which came at the expense of Ngidi: “It’s quite simple for me. I think Gerald Coetzee needs a good run. We all know the promise that he holds, and now’s as good a time as ever to unleash him. Without giving too much away, I’d like to think that I’d be in a position to play all our quick bowlers in Centurion. Depending on what the Wanderers throws up, that XI might change. It’s purely Gerald ahead of Lungi right now.”

And on the elevation of De Zorzi, the leading batter in domestic first-class cricket this season with 489 runs at 122.25 in five innings and a best effort of 304 not out: “Tony’s career has gone in one direction, north rather than south. He’s someone I identify as a future captain. The fact that he’s scored a mountain of runs is no surprise to me.”

And on the axed Van der Dussen, Erwee and Zondo: “I don’t think anybody is in a position to say there’s never a way back in. You can never say never. But changes had to be made and I made them. What must they do to come back in? Score lots of runs at domestic level at a good strike rate. If you want to play internationally you’ve got to dominate domestically not only the amount of runs but at the rate at which you score them.”

And on why a squad for two Tests on the Highveld should include three spinners in Keshav Maharaj, Simon Harmer and Muthusamy: “I’m old-fashioned in terms of a batting line-up. I want seven batters. So I want to increase our allrounder stocks. Allrounders don’t only have to be seam bowlers, they can also be guys who bowl spin. In Wiaan and ‘Sen’, we get that balance. If I want to play four quicks because I think the pitch is going to be a certain way, it gives me the option to play ‘Sen’.”

Conrad and Walter will hold a lot of authority, but Enoch Nkwe, CSA’s director of cricket, saw value in the modern idea of giving coaches more clout: “I’ve always believed the coach should have more of a say in selection, as long as it’s in line with CSA’s bigger strategy. It is going to be an interim phase, something we want to trial. But I believe the two coaches are the best positioned people to talk about selection.”

Bavuma is still the ODI captain but he has given up the T20I leadership in the wake of South Africa’s disastrous World Cup campaign in the format in Australia in October and November. His successor in that format has yet to be named. 

Conrad deputised in an ODI series against England in Bloemfontein and Kimberley at the end of last month while Walter organised his move back to South Africa from New Zealand, where he has coached since 2016. Conrad said he and Bavuma strengthened their bond during that time: “He knows how I want to do things, and I’ve got a good understanding of how he wants to be involved and run things. Our couple of days in Bloemfontein and Kimberley have gone a long way in consolidating the fact that Temba was going to be the captain. Hopefully his performances will keep shining. I think captaincy sits well with him.”

Among South Africa’s active Test batters, only Elgar has averaged higher than Bavuma’s 34.53 measured from the latter’s debut in December 2014. None have scored more half-centuries than their 20 apiece. But Elgar has made 11 centuries in that time and Bavuma only one. 

That was no doubt among the reasons Elgar was appointed in March 2021. He guided South Africa to victory in both Tests in St Lucia in June that year, and helped his team rally from 0-1 to beat India at home in December 2021 and January 2022. They drew the series in Christchurch in February last year after losing the first match by an innings inside three days. Two victories over Bangladesh at home followed in March and April, and Elgar seemed to cement his position when South Africa shocked England by an innings in three days at Lord’s in August — the only Test Ben Stokes’ team lost last year. But that was the last time Elgar presided over a win. South Africa slumped to defeat at Old Trafford — where they made the nonsensical decision to change their XI — and at the Oval. In December and January they lost at the Gabba and the MCG, and drew at the SCG.

Anyone tasked with Test captaincy could do worse than seek the counsel of Graeme Smith. Nobody in the world has had more matches at the helm than his 109, and nobody has celebrated more victories than his 53. Among captains who have been in charge for at least 60 Tests, only Ricky Ponting, Virat Kohli and Clive Lloyd have a better winning percentage than Smith’s 48.62. It was Smith who led South Africa to their most notable achievement in cricket — when they won the series in England in July and August 2012 to take the ICC Test mace off the home side.

At another press conference on Friday, four hours before Bavuma’s appointment was announced, Smith was asked what advice he might have for a new South Africa Test captain. “Depending on who it is — you would have to understand what phase of their career they’re in, and how much experience they have — the important part is for them to understand the strategy of how they’re going to get our team playing well again and dominating the world again,” Smith said.

“All people in these types of leadership positions are going to have a strong buy-in with the key administrators who can help them grow the game and get better — from the selectors to the director of cricket to the chief executive to some of the board members. That support and that structure and the alignment of the strategy is so important. They need to invest in that and take things on. We wish them well and that strategy around how they’re going to take things forward, they need to make sure they get proper buy-in and support.”

How much of that Bavuma has, and how much will come his way in the coming weeks and months, and how much might be lost, cannot be known. But we do know where the buck stops.

South Africa Test squad: Temba Bavuma (captain), Gerald Coetzee, Tony de Zorzi, Dean Elgar, Simon Harmer, Marco Jansen, Heinrich Klaasen, Keshav Maharaj, Aiden Markram, Wiaan Mulder, Senuran Muthusamy, Anrich Nortjé, Keegan Petersen, Kagiso Rabada, Ryan Rickelton.

Cricbuzz 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

SCG fightback a drop in South Africa’s bucket of woe

“We want to be successful all around the world. We don’t want to be a team that only wins at home.” – Malibongwe Maketa

Telford Vice / Cape Town

THIS time last year cricketminded South Africans were as buoyant as a balloon in a sunny park. It was two days after their Test team had beaten top ranked India in a gnarly contest at the Wanderers and three days before the series decider at Newlands. There was admiration, respect and hope.

Maybe Keegan Petersen could and would fill the immense void left by Hashim Amla. Maybe Marco Jansen was more than just outrageously tall and left-arm. Maybe Dean Elgar was the answer to the questions that had been asked since Graeme Smith retired. Maybe people should get off Mark Boucher’s case and let him coach. 

A year on and that balloon seems to have been made of lead and the sunny park has become a swamp in a hurricane. South Africa won at Newlands, reducing no less than Virat Kohli into an impotent caricature shrieking into the stump microphone. But they have lost five of the 10 Tests they have played since, including four consecutively before Sunday’s rain-forced draw in Sydney. In the process they lost a rubber in Australia for the first time in the four they’ve played there from 2008/09.

The cumulative effect of South Africa’s recent failures is that their performance on the last day at the SCG, where they resumed on 149/6, then followed on after being dismissed 220 behind, and reached 106/2 before hands were shaken, has been held up as a turning point towards better days.

“We actually had a conversation last night: we can either go lie down and let Aussie roll us here and create a little bit more embarrassment or we can go and fight out on day five,” Dean Elgar told a press conference. It’s great to see how the guys responded around that.

“There are a lot of learnings to be taken out of today. The flip side could have been that we could have been done here by lunch time and that would have not sat very well in the camp. It’s great to see how the guys responded in terms of how we conducted our conversation into some very good practice today.”

Malibongwe Maketa, the interim coach, concurred: “Today, to come out and fight the way we did, was encouraging. We knew we had to bat way above our average to compete.”

South Africa lost six wickets and scored 212 runs on Sunday. Seen objectively that’s hardly cause for the sighs of relief emitted by Elgar and Maketa. But when you’ve been bowled out for fewer than 200 — once for 99 — in seven of your previous eight innings, 255 in the first innings in Sydney and three of your four batters in the second dig spending at least an hour at the crease looks like a skyscraper of achievement, not the modest two-storey block it is. That’s perspective, and the South Africans could be forgiven for theirs being skew currently.

But they’ve brought that on themselves. They’re in this mess because, after beating England by an innings inside three days at Lord’s in August, they took their foot off their opponents’ throat by changing their XI. Thus the South Africans, in one disastrous decision, disrespected what they had done at Lord’s and paid England respect that, based on that performance, they did not deserve. Grateful for the gasp of air they were granted, Ben Stokes’ ambitious, fearless team smacked the visitors upside the head at Old Trafford and at the Oval. Elgar’s team haven’t been the same since, particularly at the crease.

Yet the difference between the teams in runs scored off the bat in England was a marginal 67. In Australia it was 277. Steve Smith, Travis Head, David Warner and Usman Khawaja each made more than 200 runs in the series, and Alex Carey and Marnus Labuschagne passed 100. Temba Bavuma’s 185 was the highest South African aggregate. Kyle Verreynne and Sarel Erwee were their only other players to reach three figures in the rubber. Verreynne and Erwee are also South Africa’s most recent centurions — they made 126 not out and 108 in Christchurch in February last year. Australia banked four hundreds, among them Warner’s 200 at the MCG, in this series alone. 

Conditions have been an important factor in South Africa’s struggles. Of the six Tests they have played from the start of the England series, only in their last two matches in Australia, in Melbourne and Sydney, were the pitches decent for batting. Having been rattled and rolled in the first four of those games — and come out on the right side of the equation only once — South Africa’s batters couldn’t regroup even on a good surface. Too much tentativeness and doubt had crept in by the time they took guard at the MCG.

“From a confidence point of view, naturally the batters would have been hit,” Justin Sammons, the batting consultant, told a press conference on Friday. “In the [MCG] Test, an area we had been improving on as a batting group — the mental errors we were making — we slipped up. We strayed out of our gameplan.”

Then there’s experience. Australia’s XI at the SCG have 568 Test caps between them, South Africa’s 310. South Africa’s top seven have 307 innings, Australia’s almost twice as many: 591. The disparity persists at domestic level, where Australia’s six state sides play a double round of Sheffield Shield matches and a final. In South Africa this season, first-class teams will play only seven matches each — not least because the inaugural edition of the SA20, which starts on Tuesday, has been wedged into what would normally be time to play the longer format.

“There’s no substitute for experience and you can only gain experience by playing,” Sammons said. “The more games you play the better you’re going to get and the more lessons you’re going to take. It’s an important focus area in terms of how we manage to still look after the first-class system. It’s going to be a tricky balancing act now with the way the world is going. But we do need a way to balance it. We need our guys playing as much cricket as possible. That’s the way you get better.”

It’s telling that a bid to increase the number of first-class matches has been launched by the players, in the form of a resolution taken at the South African Cricketers’ Association annual meeting in November, and not by CSA. The underlying reality is that first-class cricket leaks money, which a T20 tournament can make. Essentially, the SA20 will pay the salaries of Elgar, Maketa, Sammons and everyone else who might see their primary focus as Test cricket. So finding methods to live with T20 is essential.

“We’ve got to think out of the box, as a board or the director of cricket, to find ways,” Sammons said. “There have to be ways. We can’t just resign ourselves to the fact and say, ‘That’s it, we’re not going to play enough first-class cricket. T20 is going to dominate.’ We can’t have that mindset. We’ve got to have the mindset of saying we’ve got to find a way. How we go about that is up to the decision-makers. It’s key for us. We have to play more first-class cricket.”

Sammons sees in Verreynne, who played 50 first-class matches in almost seven years before making his Test debut, and who scored two of South Africa’s four half-centuries in Australia, what the country’s system, albeit flawed, is capable of producing: “His growth has been tremendous, from a technical point of view and mentally. His success lies in being able to play at his tempo and his rhythm. He’s also clear in terms of his identity as a cricketer. He understands who he is and how he’s going to go about making runs. That’s a big part of batting. If you see Dean bat, you know what you’re getting. You see the same thing day in, day out. You would say the same about [Jacques] Kallis or Graeme Smith. I think [Verreynne] has that.”

Sammons also had good things to say about Khawaja, who made an undefeated 195 at the SCG: “You can easily go into the mindset of just trying to survive, in comparison to still being positive. That doesn’t mean you need to be reckless. What Khawaja’s done so well is stay in his gameplan. That’s going to be the key for us — to still have that positive mindset and not make it about survival.”

Khawaja’s reckless hack at a Kyle Abbott away swinger in Hobart in November 2016 precipitated a collapse of 8/32 that sealed South Africa’s innings victory, and with it series honours. Khawaja has since rebuilt his game, anchoring it on disciplined aggression, and was rewarded with three centuries, two innings in the 90s and three half-centuries in 2022. He was dismissed for fewer than 50 only four times in his dozen trips to the crease.

Elgar has walked that walk, but in something like reverse. He has made eight of his 13 centuries in 102 innings since the 2016 Hobart Test, but none in his most recent 31 completed innings; an unbeaten 96 against India at the Wanderers in January an honourable exception. Elgar has gone two years without a hundred, which is unacceptable for a player who leads by example more than by other measures of captaincy. It doesn’t help that, in his six innings in Australia, he made some of his trouble himself by being strangled down the legside three times and falling victim to a runout.

“I accept that maybe once, maybe twice but the third time is something that highly irritates me,”Elgar said. “You have a way of getting out and bowlers target that. Ten years into a Test career, it’s foreign territory for me. It’s something to reflect on and you can either say it’s shit luck or not. I’m going to have an open mind around it and have a look. It’s frustrating that I could never get going and when I did get going I managed to run myself out [for 26 at the MCG].”

As a red-ball specialist in a system short on red-ball cricket Elgar will be able to get away from it all for the next few weeks: “I’m taking as much time off as I want; that’s what I need at the moment. I just want to get on a plane, and go home and chill out and have a braai and maybe go to the bush and play some golf.”

Maketa, who is reportedly on a shortlist of candidates CSA have interviewed for the permanent version of his position, spoke with a refreshing frankness: “It’s important for us to be honest with ourselves. We had a tough series in England and we had a tough series here. We want to compete against the big teams but we don’t have the Test caps they have at the moment. We’ve done well against them in the past and now they are better than us. We brought the best team we had [to Australia] and we didn’t compete.

“Conditions were better than what we’ve played in in the last 12 months. I was quite encouraged that we’d be able to get that 350 par score for us to be able to put them under pressure and we weren’t able to do that. 

“The stats say South Africa is the most difficult place to bat when it comes to Test cricket [with batters averaging 29.63, lower than in any other country that has hosted more than one Test]. We’ve found a way. With the younger batters, do we expose them to better wickets to get enough runs to perform at this level or do we say we are the team that’s going to win at home and we make it difficult for visiting teams? That’s the way we need to look at things.

“If we are comfortable to win at home, we can leave it the way it is. We want to be successful all around the world. Because to win the WTC you have to come here and win, you have to go to India and win. We don’t want to be a team that only wins at home.”

A year ago, South Africans wouldn’t have dreamt they would have to have this conversation. The balloon has burst.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

MCG Test looms tall, dark and ugly for South Africa

“Today was the first time we had more soft dismissals than not. That’s disappointing.” – Kyle Verreynne

Telford Vice / Cape Town

YOU know you’re in trouble when the opposition captain wins the toss and, on a pitch clearly full of runs, puts you in to bat nevertheless. It’s an insult to your batters as well as your bowlers, and the last thing you need when your confidence is bruised. But that’s the kind of thing that happens when you hit rock bottom.

South Africa dwindled to that point at the MCG on Monday. They were inserted and bowled out for 189 on a blameless surface. Then their bowlers, perhaps weary of being tasked for the umpteenth time with cleaning up the mess the batters had made, allowed Australia to advance to within 144 runs of parity for the loss only of Usman Khawaja’s wicket. Tuesday looms tall, dark and not at all handsome for the visitors.

Monday’s mournful batting brought to seven the number of consecutive innings in which the South Africans have been dismissed for fewer than 200. It’s not a record: the South Africans’ first dozen Test innings, from March 1889 to March 1896, were snuffed out for between 151 and 30.

They were bowled out for fewer than 200 five straight times between 182 and 93 from August 1912 and December 1913. They’ve had three streaks of four in a row — most recently in November and December 2015 — and six of three on the bounce, the last of them between June and December 2021. Seven is in its own league.

Who can say it won’t be eight by the end of the second Test? Or if South Africa won’t rub that 19th century record from the books before the sun sets on the summer? It’s a pessimistic thought, but in the wake of Monday’s mayhem how else are we to see the glass except as more than half-empty and cracked?

The first half-dozen of the sub-200 efforts in the current crisis — and it is unarguably a crisis — were all recorded in conditions designed to inhibit the scoring of runs and make early dismissal probable. That wasn’t the case this time, as Kyle Verreynne acknowledged during a press conference when he compared the pitch to the Gabba’s, which was duly deemed below average after the first Test: “It looks a lot barer, there’s not much grass. It didn’t seem as if there was as much seam movement today. It’s a better wicket to bat on.”

So the visitors had no-one and nothing to blame but themselves. “Today’s [performance is] harder to accept than the previous six innings,” Verreynne said. “If we look back at those games there was a lot of good bowling and we stuck to our gameplans. Today was the first time we had more soft dismissals than not. That’s disappointing.”

Two of them stuck out. Theunis de Bruyn, playing his first Test since October 2019, looked like he meant business in scoring a solid 12 off the first 29 balls he faced. The 30th, from Cameron Green, was short and rose above De Bruyn’s upper-cutting bat. Would he learn that lesson? No. The 31st was also short, and De Bruyn lurched into a reckless pull and sent a top edge skewing behind the cordon, where Alex Carey took the catch.

Seventeen deliveries later, and eight minutes before lunch, Dean Elgar did something he hadn’t in his previous 141 Test innings. He nudged Mitchell Starc into the covers, called Temba Bavuma for a single that was never there and set off. Marcus Labuschagne slid, gathered, and fired off his throw from one knee. The ball hit the stumps at the non-striker’s end with Elgar short of safety by an embarrassingly large margin to mark the only instance of him being run out.

Bavuma edged Starc’s next delivery, a sniping away swinger, to Carey. South Africa — who had been 54/1 — were 58/4, and neither of their batters at the crease, Khaya Zondo and Verreynne, had faced a ball. In the fifth over after lunch, Labuschagne dived to catch Zondo’s cracking cover drive off Starc to reduce South Africa 67/5 and to set the stage for their only partnership of 30 or more.

It lasted for 219 deliveries and yielded 112 runs, and asked more important questions than it answered. How could a wicketkeeper and a fast bowler — both among the most junior members of the team — score more runs than their more experienced elders and, allegedly, betters? Verreynne is playing his 13th Test, Marco Jansen his ninth. Without their contribution, which endured for almost three hours, South Africa might have been on course for another humiliation in two days, like they suffered in Brisbane.

Verreynne’s and Jansen’s dismissals were part of a shocking clatter of five wickets for 10 runs that ended the innings in an inglorious blaze of 24 deliveries. The Australians bowled well, none more so than Green, who stepped into the breach after Starc had left the field with a finger injury to take 5/27. But not well enough for Green, a batting allrounder, mind, to claim his last four for as many runs in a dozen of his deliveries.

South Africa’s malaise goes beyond technique, which shouldn’t be part of the discussion at this level. Instead it is what happens when the gap between first-class and Test level yawns into a chasm, not least because the top batters and bowlers don’t often play domestic cricket. Invariably they’re being rested or they’re somewhere else earning the kind of money CSA can’t afford to pay them. That means the statistics produced in the first-class game cannot be trusted to identify players who have the quality to make the step up. Therefore there are no ready answers to South Africa’s problems beyond the current crop of beleaguered batters battling their way to better days, however long that may take.

That seems unfair on them, given that for almost 24 years the South Africans could count one or more of their top four all-time runscorers keeping them out of trouble. Jacques Kallis made his debut in December 1995 and Hashim Amla retired in February 2019. Their careers bookended those of Graeme Smith and AB de Villiers. South Africa played 235 Tests during that time, and at least one of the fab four was involved in all but nine of those matches. South Africa won 116 and lost 62 of them: a winning percentage of 49.36 and a losing mark of 26.38%.

They have played 24 Tests since the end of the Kallis-Smith-De Villiers-Amla era. The 11 they have won translates into a comparable success rate of 45.83%. But they lose significantly more often: 54.17% of the time. They are, by this measure, 27.79% weaker than they were when Kallis, Smith, De Villiers or Amla, or a combination of them, were in their XI.

When South Africa returned to Test cricket in April 1992 under Kepler Wessels, the philosophy was to make sure they couldn’t lose before they tried to win. More than 30 years on, they have lost even that ability: it’s difficult to imagine any of their players batting for almost eight hours to save a Test, like Faf du Plessis did in Adelaide in November 2012. But how do you think about trying to win when you’re focused on not losing?

England have answered that question in emphatic fashion under Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes by playing with what some would consider outrageous freedom to win nine of their 10 Tests. As Stokes told the BBC on Monday, “If the ambition of winning is always bigger than the fear of losing, you’re always going to be OK.” South Africa are not OK. They have neither the mindset nor, it appears, the skill to play like they used to, nevermind how England do currently.

Part of the reason is that one of the few connections between South Africans of any race, religion, culture or creed is a suffocating conservatism; a desperation to hang onto outdated ideas and ways of doing things for fear of confronting change and new realities. That’s why, more than 28 years after it was peacefully defeated at the ballot box, apartheid is violently alive outside of the ivory towers in which we keep our constitution and laws.

But here’s a nugget of reality that seems worth clinging to, a reason to be if not cheerful then at least not despairing: South Africa are the only team to have beaten England under McCullum and Stokes. That was in August. You know you’re in trouble when it seems like many Augusts ago.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Going, going, Gabba: cruising for a Brisbane bruising

“Is that a good advertisement for our format?” – Dean Elgar on the Gabba pitch.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

DEAN Elgar has slammed the Gabba pitch on which Australia beat South Africa in less than two days, and said he was ignored when he asked the umpires about the dangers of batting on the surface. But he stopped short of branding the conditions unsafe.

Australia completed their victory an hour after tea on Sunday; just five-and-a-half sessions into a match that was scheduled to end around sunset on Wednesday. The game was decided in 866 deliveries — the second fewest in the 355 men’s Tests that have been won and lost in Australia. South Africa were put in to bat and bowled out for 152 and 99. Australia made 218 and 35/4.

By stumps on Saturday, the soft, green, seaming pitch was already studded with divots — which hardened on Sunday to add inconsistent and sometimes steepling bounce to the sideways movement batters had to contend with throughout. Consequently most of Elgar’s post-match press conference focused on his thoughts on the pitch, starting with the first question.

“Let’s not waste any time,” Elgar said with a hollow laugh. “You’ve got to ask yourself — is that a good advertisement for our format? Thirty-four wickets in two days; a pretty one-sided affair I would say. We want to see the game go to four or five days.

“The nature of how it started to play, with some seriously steep bounce with the old ball, you’re on a hiding to nothing as a batting unit. Only three batsmen applied themselves half decently and scored runs. I don’t think that was a very good Test wicket.”

Travis Head’s 92 in the first innings proved the matchwinning batting performance in a game in which Kyle Verreynne’s 64 was the only other score higher than Temba Bavuma’s 38. Fifteen of the 34 dismissed batters faced 10 or fewer deliveries.

Had Elgar raised his concerns with the umpires, Chris Gaffaney and Rod Tucker? “I did ask the umpires,” he said. “When ‘KG’ got Head out down leg [on Sunday], I said, ‘How long does it go on for before it potentially is unsafe?’ Then Nortjé was bowling those short ones that were flying over our heads. I know the game was dead and buried. It was never to change or put a halt to the game, but that was where the umpires’ discretion comes into play; not us as players.” 

Kagiso Rabada had Head caught behind with what became the eighth-last ball of the match, which ended with Anrich Nortjé’s bouncer sailing well over batter Cameron Green and wicketkeeper Verreynne. The ball went all the way to the boundary for five wides, the winning runs.

Did Elgar get an answer from the umpires? “No. There were only a handful of runs left [to get] at that stage, so maybe they thought I was just trying to take the mickey. But it’s not a bad reference point going forward to get a reply. I don’t see it changing anything, but there wasn’t a reply.”

Did he think the pitch was unsafe? “I’m not going to say it was unsafe or it wasn’t safe,” Elgar said, doubtless to avoid the insult of a fine being added to the injury that potentially awaited those who dared bat on the surface.

But he was happy to explain the challenge: “The edges of the divots start to get harder and they become more abrasive because the wicket starts drying out. Back home the wickets are also prone to creating those divots, and it becomes a handful. But generally that only happens later in the game, when those divots start playing quite a big role. This one seemed to start yesterday already.

“I’m not a curator and I wouldn’t know how to prepare a cricket pitch, but it was interesting to see how quickly this one actually did start divotting and how quickly the ball sped up; especially the new ball. Also today the older ball was flying through, which shouldn’t be really happening. The divots had a big role to play, especially with the sideways movement and then up and down. And then the ball that’s got that steep bounce, which is quite something to face.”

Asked what his players would do with their three bonus days off, Elgar said: “The guys know their games well enough, and hitting another 100 or 200 balls a day is not going to make you a better cricketer. It’s just one of those games where you’ve failed. I’d rather see the guys not do anything until we get to Melbourne [where the second Test starts next Monday]. Other guys might feel they need to go and do stuff, and I’m sure the coaching staff will give them the best opportunity to be ready for the next Test.”

What changes to their team might the South Africans envisage, what with Theunis de Bruyn and Heinrich Klaasen the spare batters in a squad that also includes uncapped pace threat Gerald Coetzee? “All options are on the table,” Elgar said. “But you still have to go away and give your batters the confidence and the positivity. The guys in the changeroom have played enough cricket to know that this was maybe one of those instances where … let’s be honest and let’s be real about what’s just happened. It’s not like our guys were throwing wickets away. We were getting absolutely jaffaed out really. And [Australia] bowled properly. You’ve got to take all of that into consideration.

“Coming into this game our batters were confident. We prepared bloody well and we played the warm-up game where most of the guys got good runs and time in the middle. So it’s not like the confidence is low. We just need to be realistic around what’s just happened, and try and rectify it. We do have extra days now where the guys need to tap into their mental spaces, which is your biggest enemy at the moment because you can really withdraw yourself from what’s happened instead of facing it and learning from it.”

Despite losing South Africa ended the match on a high — and with an eye on the last two Tests — by dismissing Usman Khawaja, David Warner, Steve Smith and Head inside seven overs as Australia homed in on their nominal target.

“It was to try and see if we could open some old scars; purely bringing our intensity and maybe get them three or four down and those batters going into Melbourne with maybe a little bit less confidence,” Elgar said. “I guess it was one of the gameplans that worked out for us over the last two days. Can’t say there were many, but at least that one did.”

He hoped the performance of Rabada, who took 4/13 in the second innings, could “inspire our batting unit to get their heads right and knuckle down”.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

What’s for breakfast? Horror or hope?

“When you get a wicket with the first ball of the innings, and when it’s a big wicket like David Warner’s, that lifts everyone up.” – Kyle Verreynne

Telford Vice / Cape Town

SOUTH Africans who woke up to the horror of their men’s team being beaten by the Netherlands at the T20 World Cup last month arose to another awfulness on Saturday: the Test side dismissed for 152 in 48.2 overs.

They saw a green Gabba pitch cast a lurid light in the early morning gloom, and learnt that Australia had won the toss and declined to bat. How much of a factor was that in what had happened? Then they watched the highlights and realised that, while there was some seam movement and the bounce could have been more consistent, conditions were fairer than they looked. Closer to the truth was that the T20 World Cup bubble hadn’t burst. It was another nightmare on Aussie street.

Of Saturday’s XI, only Temba Bavuma, Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortjé were part of the team who dawdled, dithered and dwindled to defeat against the Dutch. That happened in Adelaide, some 1,600 kilometres to the south-east of Brisbane, and in starkly different circumstances. Bavuma responded to concerns about his state of mind and his elbow by batting through three partnerships, including a stand of 98 with Kyle Verreynne — who showed discipline and dash in his 64 — that saved South Africa from ignominy, for two solid hours.

But, like wildfires and viruses, these things have a way of leaping even the most imposing boundaries. As hands plopped bread into toasters, the thought crossed more than a few minds that Adelaide was rudely alive and unfortunately well and had bloody well made the trip to Brisbane.

The idea was still banging around as coffee was being brewed. Not for the first time it would be up to the bowlers to keep South Africa in the game. Whistles went on kettles and toasters popped with Rabada at the top of his run, staring down the barrel at David Warner.

It had to be Warner. Of course it did. Long before March 2018, when he launched himself verbally and then physically at Quinton de Kock at Kingsmead and directed the ball-tampering plot that was exposed at Newlands, Warner has served, no doubt unwittingly, as a talisman for South Africa’s players.

Also at Newlands, in an ODI in October 2016, Imran Tahir viscerally channelled his adopted nation’s undying dislike of Warner, for them the ultimate ugly Aussie. First Tahir delivered a furious flurry of words from the bowling crease. Then he unleashed a throw of wonder from the deep to run Warner out. Tahir couldn’t be called a calm cricketer but he blazed with rare passion that night. Warner is to cricketminded South Africans what a lit match is to a braai loaded with kindling and wood.

As Faf du Plessis wrote in Faf: Through Fire, “… no player roused the dog in me more easily than David Warner. It wasn’t necessarily personal. It was rather his behaviour on the field that enabled me to intensify my focus. The way he climbed into me at the Adelaide Oval in 2012 just strengthened my resolve when the team needed me most.

“In all my years of playing against Australia, Warner sledged me the most. That made it easy for me to focus on just one player in order to enter the mental zone I needed to perform optimally. Against other sides, I had to make a real effort to identify an opponent who could serve as a stand-in for David Warner … someone who could get my blood boiling and my focus zoned in. It’s amusing to look back now on the lengths I went to to replicate the feelings I had when playing against Australia. Australia, however, unlocked the fighter in me, and Warner in particular, did this just by breathing.”

Rabada took a breath of his own, loped in on bespoke liquid air, and let loose a delivery bound for Warner’s throat. The left-hander managed to put the splice of his fending bat in the way, and it looked as if he had done enough for the ball to loop over short leg. Khaya Zondo, not the tallest at a touch under six feet, rose and rose and rose some more to pluck the catch, return to earth, and applaud for all his worth — not his and Rabada’s good work but South Africa striking back at the first opportunity. To do so by ridding the scene of Warner, who on his walk back to the dressing room jerked his head around as if he had copped a shard of the flavour of flak he likes to dish out, is as good as it gets.  

“When you get bowled out for 152, as much as you want to get the energies up it is quite difficult,” Verreynne told a press conference. “So when you get a wicket with the first ball of the innings, and when it’s a big wicket like David Warner’s, that lifts everyone up.”

Australia also lost Marnus Labuschagne and Usman Khawaja to Marco Jansen and Nortjé inside the first 10 overs. Khawaja’s dismissal was completed slickly at third slip by Simon Harmer, who was on the field while Lungi Ngidi was having strapping applied. That reduced the home side to 27/3, which had a familiar ring to it because South Africa had slumped to the same score on their way to 27/4 inside the first hour. As the visitors had done, the Australians leaned heavily on one partnership: the 117 shared by Steve Smith and Travis Head.

“For the next 10 overs [after Warner’s dismissal] we carried that energy and adrenaline,” Verreynne said. “That set us up nicely, but we fell away for the next 10 overs.” Nortjé and Jansen bowled scoreless overs in the 5.4 after Khawaja went, a time of rasping aggression by the bowlers that yielded five scoring shots and 19 runs. The next five overs went for exactly twice as many runs.

Nortjé steered a sniping scrambled-seam inswinger into Smith’s stumps five balls before stumps, and Rabada ended the day by having Scott Boland, chasing widely, caught behind. “We’re still behind the game, but those two wickets have opened a window for us,” Verreynne said. 

Australia will resume seven runs behind and banking on Head, who has the manner of an especially enterprising street-fighter, to add significantly to his 78. Most importantly, they will want to avoid the kind of crash that claimed South Africa’s last six wickets for 27. On a pitch that is expected to gain pace overnight, and given the quality of South Africa’s attack, a collapse seems more probable than possible. As Verreynne said: “Any score we get there’s a bit of belief that our bowlers can do a job.”

Belief? That’s too much for Verreynne to expect from his compatriots as they shuffle on sleepy legs, careful not to stub their toes, through the dawny dregs of Saturday night and turn on televisions to see what Sunday has brought for breakfast. Instead of belief try hope — that South Africa are batting again, that at least one of their top three is still there, that the lead is decent, and that most of Saturday’s play was nothing more than a bad dream. But first, coffee.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Prepare for drama Down Under

“For us, mentally, it’s about cricket – what is required for us to come here and win.” – Malibongwe Maketa hopes the focus stays on the field in Australia.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

“WE know what you did last month,” South Africa’s players can be sure of hearing, laced with appropriate profanities, from their opponents during the Test series that starts at the Gabba next Saturday.

Six members of South Africa’s current squad were party to the unthinkable in Adelaide 31 days ago, when they were in the XI who lost to the Netherlands and consequently crashed out of the men’s T20 World Cup. Two more who were in that mournful dressing room, as travelling reserves, are back in Australia.

How will Malibongwe Maketa, the visitors’ interim coach, make Temba Bavuma, Marco Jansen, Heinrich Klaasen, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Anrich Nortjé, Kagiso Rabada and Lizaad Williams concentrate on what lies ahead rather than what is in the still raw, recent past? Especially when they have the Australians in their ear doing the opposite?

“It’s totally different formats and we have made sure that, mentally and physically, the guys have had a longer break,” Maketa told reporters from Brisbane on Tuesday, a reference to Bavuma and Rabada not playing domestic cricket before the tour. “Now that we’re here the focus is on how we are going to go about winning this series.

“The players who were here during the World Cup have contributed in terms of [discussing] the conditions, albeit that they were T20 conditions. We have been challenging them to make sure they are putting their energy into the team, which is what they’ve done. Test cricket brings different pressures and the mental switch has definitely happened, and earlier than we expected. The energy that we’ve received from them has been positive.”

New as Maketa is in his position — he was appointed on November 2 having served as Ottis Gibson’s assistant from August 2017 until July 2019 — he will know that a Test series in Australia is about more than cricket. In November 2012 it was about a dossier the Australians allegedly had compiled on their opponents that, on cursory inspection, read more like lightly edited sections of Mickey Arthur’s autobiography than anything revelatory or insightful. Four years later it was about the intimate relationship between Faf du Plessis, the mints in his mouth, and the ball. 

The off-field stakes have been raised incrementally since South Africa completed their first ever Test series victory in Australia in January 2009, no doubt because they have followed that success with two more. It’s not that the Australian press favours the home side, who are invariably held to a far higher standard than opponents — as was proved again during the 2018 ball-tampering scandal. Rather, a highly competent and competent media don’t hold back. Deference is a dirty word. Every angle is explored and exploited to the full, and to a degree not often reached in South Africa.

Good luck trying to dissuade Australian reporters from writing about a change being forced in the batting order after Kyle Verreynne’s grandfather suffered a heart attack in the stands — as South Africa’s team management tried to do, unsuccessfully, when that happened during the Lord’s Test in August. Similarly, Dean Elgar’s assertion last week that the recalled Theunis de Bruyn had “gone through a lot of personal things which I’ll never speak of” is sure to be revisited in Australia if De Bruyn is picked, and particularly if he does well. How might Maketa manage that challenge?

“It’s difficult, but our experience tells us each series has had its own hiccups. For us, mentally, it’s about cricket — what is required for us to come here and win. That’s been the driving force. We’ve got enough personnel and support to make sure we deal with whatever situation we might encounter.”

For now, Maketa appears intent on forging the important bond with Elgar: “Our relationship is strong and based on hard work. We’re similar in what we’re looking for in terms of the team and the performance. Like I said to the guys when I joined the team, I’m here to support Dean in every way to make sure that he not only gets what he wants but that he gets the guys onside in terms of performances.”

Maketa attained his level four certificate — the highest qualification in the field in South Africa — since September 2015, and would seem to have a firm grip on his boundaries as a coach: “The only way I can affect the game is through preparation; I know the guys are not liking me at the moment in the sense that we’ve had some really hard [training] sessions. Once the game starts I hand over and the biggest thing then is how do we support the players as a coaching staff. And consistently asking ourselves questions on how we can turn the game around or how we can stay ahead in the game, and giving that information to the players and to Dean to make sure we support them.

“I’m more relaxed when the game starts. I know I’ll be comfortable that we’ve done all the work and everything that’s required for us to go out there and perform. Everything else is down to the players. As a coaching staff, I encourage us not to get in the way of the players but to trust the work that they’ve done and make sure the environment is conducive for them to perform.”

Maketa spoke the day after England had found ways to win in Rawalpindi on a pitch that was the antithesis of the swinging and seaming conditions that helped them claim victory in six of the seven Tests they played at home this year. England beat Pakistan, by 74 runs, on Monday despite the match yielding an aggregate of 1,768 runs, the third most in Test history and the most since 1939. Under coach Brendon McCullum and captain Ben Stokes, the English could be said to be revolutionising the oldest format of the game. Might South Africa try to emulate them?

“There’s different takes to getting people to the ground,” Maketa said. “We know if you start winning people will come. The Australia of old made their goal scoring around four [runs an over] to make sure they were getting people to the ground, and they were still winning. It was a win-win for them.

“For us, it’s about going out there and winning. We know that, back home, people will support winning teams regardless of what happens. That’s how we’re looking to set out our stall. We want to play good, attractive cricket; brave cricket. But Test cricket is meant to be played for five days. If it means we win in the last session on the fifth day, we’ll take that.”

Maketa should prepare to be reminded that England’s Bazballers did indeed show the patience to win in the last session of the fifth day, and to be asked if he is driving his players too hard — shortly after he spoke, team management said Wednesday’s planned training session had been cancelled. Welcome to Australia, coach.

Cricbuzz

SA batters better prepared for Australia than bowlers

Heinrich Klaasen, Kyle Verreynne, Dean Elgar, Theunis de Bruyn score big, but Simon Harmer only Test bowler in form.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

A triple century, two double centuries, 13 centuries, one 10-wicket haul and six five-fors were the highlights of this month’s opening three rounds of matches in the top division in South Africa’s first-class season. Four of the biggest scores belong to players who are in the squad for next month’s Test series in Australia, as is the competition’s leading wicket-taker.

That will spark hope that fresh memories can be made to take the edge off a shambolic performance against the Netherlands in the men’s T20 World Cup in Adelaide on November 6. The 13-run loss did far more than eliminate South Africa from the running for the semi-finals.

It was a genre-busting, format-leaping, disbelief-suspending disaster that plunged the game in South Africa into the kind of gloom previously reserved for administrative meltdowns. Worse, in fact. South Africans have grown accustomed to their team rising above whatever nonsense the suits got up to. The Adelaide awfulness said that divide no longer exists.

It’s only one loss and it was suffered in the most unpredictable format. But the despair is justified. However well teams like the Dutch play against sides like South Africa, only the weather should stop the latter from winning. Always. Anything else is a disgrace to the team and a slap in the face of the people who support them.

Of the XI who were part of that catastrophe, Temba Bavuma, Heinrich Klaasen, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortjé will be back on their way to Australia on Thursday for the Tests, which start at the Gabba on December 17. They wouldn’t be human if the thought of atonement hadn’t crossed their minds.

So Klaasen will no doubt have been heartened by his 292 for the Titans against the Knights in Centurion in the second round, the highest score in the competition until Tony de Zorzi — who is not in the Test squad, made an undefeated 304, his second century of the summer, for Western Province against the Knights at Newlands a week later. Maharaj took 3/80 in the 29 overs he bowled for the Dolphins against Boland in a rain-affected draw at Kingsmead in the second round.

But Bavuma, Rabada and Nortjé have not been playing first-class cricket. Nortjé has taken 2/37 in the six overs he has bowled for the Samp Army in the Abu Dhabi T10. Bavuma and Rabada are being rested. No South Africa player has faced more deliveries this year than the 1,342 that have been bowled at Bavuma across the formats, and none of their fast bowlers has sent down more overs in 2022 than Rabada’s 309.4.

Of the other 11 players in the 16-member Test squad who have been in first-class action, Dean Elgar and Theunis de Bruyn have scored centuries and Verreynne has made a double ton — 201 for WP against Boland at Newlands in the second round. Simon Harmer, who tops the wicket-taking list with 20 in three matches, has two five-wicket hauls aside from the 14/151 he claimed for the Titans against the Lions at the Wanderers in the third round. 

Gerald Coetzee, who is in a Test squad for the first time, went wicketless for 147 in the 22 overs he bowled for the Knights while Klaasen was scoring his near-triple century. Coetzee was also part of the attack De Zorzi took apart, when he finished with 4/117 from 27 overs.

Lungi Ngidi looked like one of South Africa’s better bowlers at the T20 World Cup and will be a key part of the attack in Australia, but he was lacklustre in taking match figures of 1/89 in 22 overs for the Titans against the Lions in the same match in which Harmer caused mayhem.

South Africa’s only left-arm pace threat in the Test squad, Marco Jansen, took 3/40 in each innings — one victim was his twin brother, Duan Jansen — for the Warriors against North West at St George’s Park in the third round. Lizaad Williams, an injury replacement in the squad for Glenton Stuurman, has claimed nine wickets at 22.44 in two games.

How have the other batters in the Test squad fared? Rassie van der Dussen, coming back from the broken finger that ended his tour of England in August, has made 94 runs in four innings for the Lions. Sarel Erwee has scored 115 in three for the Dolphins, 76 of them in one innings. Khaya Zondo has a return of 53 runs from three trips to the crease for the Dolphins.

Overall, then, South Africa’s batters would seem better prepared for the Australia series than their bowlers, Harmer excepted. 

Ryan Rickelton isn’t part of this discussion despite scoring two centuries in four innings for the Lions, for whom he averages 120.00 this summer. Don’t blame the selectors: Rickleton’s name wasn’t on the list of players they were given by CSA to choose the squad for Australia. Don’t blame CSA either: sensibly, they have a policy against selecting injured players.

Rickelton returned, in September, from South Africa’s tour to England with two torn ligaments and unwanted bone growth in his left ankle. He requires surgery and is able to play only with the help of pain-relieving injections. He also stands to earn the equivalent of more than USD58,000 playing for Mumbai Indians Cape Town in the SA20, which starts on January 10. But not if he is out of action recovering from an operation. If Rickelton had been picked for Australia he likely would have ridden the bench in a bib. By staying home he will be able to play in CSA’s one-day competition, which starts on Friday. 

If it was your ankle and your bank balance and your doctors were able to keep you on the park earning money until you had a suitable window in your schedule to go under the knife, wouldn’t you make the same decision?

CSA didn’t drop the ball in taking Rickelton out of the selection conversation. But they probably should have done a better job consulting with him about his situation, and they definitely should have explained why they did what they did better than they did. A solitary line in a press release saying he “has an ankle injury that forced him to be overlooked by the national selectors but allows him to still be picked by his domestic team” reads like nonsense and is asking for trouble.

The cricketminded public haven’t hesitated to take up those cudgels. Who could blame them. First Adelaide. Now this. Could the players and the suits get it together already?

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.