Parnell comes in from Kolpak cold

No room for Rilee Rossouw, George Linde in squad to play Netherlands.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

WAYNE Parnell became the first former Kolpak player to come in from the cold on Wednesday, when South Africa named their squad to play three ODIs against the Netherlands in the coming weeks. But George Linde must be wondering what he has done wrong to be overlooked again in the wake of his surprising omission from the T20 World Cup.

Parnell, who played the last of his 111 matches for South Africa in October 2017, announced in September 2018 that he had signed a three-year Kolpak contract with Worcestershire. That precluded him from playing internationally. The Kolpak era ended when the UK left the European Union at the end of January 2020, which put players like Parnell back in the mix for South Africa — as long as they featured in the country’s domestic competitions.

This season’s provincial ODI tournament has yet to be played, but in the T20 competition Parnell captained Western Province and scored 104 runs in four innings and took five wickets at an economy rate of 8.18. In a quarter-final against the Knights he took guard with his team having sunk to 105/5 chasing 224, and hammered 80 not out off 29 balls.

The Knights won by four runs, thanks in no small part to another Kolpak returnee, Rilee Rossouw, who scored an undefeated 112 off 55. Rossouw also made another century and two 50s in five innings in that competition, in which he was the leading runscorer. But he did not crack the nod for the ODI squad.

“These selections are part of our strategy to give opportunities and reward the good work of players in our provincial system,” a CSA release quoted selection convenor Victor Mpitsang as saying.

Keshav Maharaj will captain South Africa in the absence of Temba Bavuma, who is among several rested members of the T20 World Cup squad. Also not there are Quinton de Kock, Bjorn Fortuin, Heinrich Klaasen, Aiden Markram, Wiaan Mulder, Anrich Nortjé, Kagiso Rabada and Rassie van der Dussen. Maharaj was also in charge for a drawn ODI series and a 3-0 sweep of the T20Is in Sri Lanka in September and October after Bavuma broke his thumb in the first ODI.

The T20 World Cup players who have been retained are Maharaj, Reeza Hendricks, David Miller, Lungi Ngidi, Dwaine Pretorius and Tabraiz Shamsi.

Junior Dala, Beuran Hendricks and Linde were in the side for the Lankan ODIs but have lost their places. Linde is unlucky, particularly as he could have come in for Shamsi — who would have had the chance to give the groin he tweaked at the T20 World Cup a chance to recover fully.

Zubayr Hamza and Ryan Rickelton are in an ODI squad for the first time, while there are recalls — measured on the Lankan series — for Daryn Dupavillon, Ngidi, Parnell and Khaya Zondo. Sisanda Magala, who was also selected on Wednesday, and Miller missed those Colombo matches through injury.

The series is the Netherlands’ first international series in South Africa. The first two matches will be played in Centurion on November 26 and 28, and third at the Wanderers on December 1. South Africa will eye the rubber as an opportunity to secure valuable World Cup Super League points.

South Africa squad: Keshav Maharaj (captain), Daryn Dupavillon, Zubayr Hamza, Reeza Hendricks, Sisanda Magala, Janneman Malan, David Miller, Lungi Ngidi, Dwaine Pretorius, Andile Phehlukwayo, Wayne Parnell, Ryan Rickelton, Tabraiz Shamsi, Kyle Verreynne, Lizaad Williams, Khaya Zondo.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

If you’re David Wiese, home is where the kit is

“I’d like to think there is still a place for us in the South African set-up. Whether there’s too much animosity towards us for deserting and going away, or whatever, we’ll have to wait and see.” – David Wiese on cricket after Kolpak.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

DAVID Wiese keeps “a couple of crates in my garage” in Pretoria, where he still lives despite being among cricket’s most travelled players. Into those boxes goes the kit he has amassed from turning out for, at last count, 19 teams in every format except Test cricket and including new-fangled novelties like T10 and The Hundred.

“I need to make a plan with it all at some stage,” Wiese told Cricbuzz from his hotel room in Abu Dhabi. “You think you might need it someday, and then the next tournament comes along and you get another kit and another helmet. It just keeps piling up.”

When next he’s home — briefly, no doubt — the pile is set to grow. Wiese will play for Namibia, the country of his father’s birth, in the T20 World Cup. That may seem a mercenary move for a 36-year-old allrounder who has 14 T20 franchises on his CV. It isn’t, as he explains: “Back in the day when I was playing for Easterns [regularly from October 2005 to October 2011], Namibia played on the domestic circuit in South Africa. As soon as they caught wind that my dad was born there and I could get a Namibian passport, they started talking to me.

“It was always something that was in the back of my mind, but then I started playing for the Titans and got picked for the Proteas and it kind of fell away. And after playing for South Africa I would have had to wait four years to play for Namibia. So while the thought has always been there I’d be lying if I said I expected to be here. I never thought I would actually end up using my Namibian passport.”

Now that he has, what did he think of the chances of a team who were last at this level at the 2003 World Cup? “We are underdogs of note, and I think everybody has written us off. But what I’ve gathered from the Namibian side is that’s almost the way they like it.” In a country that is 64% desert and where teams travel hundreds of kilometres to play a club match, toughness comes standard.

Then there’s Pierre de Bruyn, Namibia’s coach, who also played for Easterns and the franchise they were part of, the Titans. But never with Wiese, who is eight years younger. Even so, the hard-scrabble culture of cricket at Willowmoore Park in Benoni — famously the flat pitch and small, fast outfield where Denis Compton plundered 300 in a minute more than three hours in December 1948 — is not a long way from what it takes to succeed in Namibia. “Pierre was one of those hard Easterns players, and he’s instilled a lot of that into the Namibian side,” Wiese said. With Albie Morkel, another Easterns and Titans stalwart, also aboard the good ship Namibia as a consultant, fighting spirit shouldn’t be in short supply. There’s more South Africaness on hand in Richard das Neves, the assistant coach and strength and conditioning specialist, and Maurice Aronstam, the team psychologist. The mere fact that the Namibians have those kinds of bases covered suggests they are serious.  

“Nobody’s expecting us to make it through [the opening round], but we can use that to our advantage,” Wiese said. “We’re playing Sri Lanka in our first game [in Abu Dhabi on Monday], and they could easily under-estimate us and we could catch them unawares. It’s going to be hard work, but I feel we have one or two surprises up our sleeve.”

He sounded like he meant it, which doesn’t fit with the idea of the hired gun who arrives, plays and leaves in short order. In 2019 — the last time cricket was unaffected by the pandemic — Wiese featured in 66 matches for six teams in five countries. He popped up for the Tshwane Spartans in the eliminator and final of the MSL that year. In August this year he replaced Mohammad Nabi, the Afghan allrounder who went home for personal reasons, for the London Spirit’s last two games in The Hundred. Could he, unlike many of us, make sense of cricket’s latest terrible infant? “Everyone thought it would be a 16.4-over T20 game, but it wasn’t. It had a completely different feel and it was a good tournament to be involved with. Fortunately for me I came in a bit late. By that time the guys had kind of … not figured it out, but they had realised it was completely different to T20. They’re only small shifts but they’re really significant. Small things like bowlers can bowl back-to-back overs and the new batter has to face when he comes in. The T20 game could take a leaf out of that book.” From there it was across the Atlantic to play five matches for the St Lucia Kings in the CPL.

How did Wiese stay focused in the maelstrom of travelling and playing? “When you get that busy and play so many games you rely on momentum. There’s not a stage where, for two or three weeks, you’re not hitting balls. You’re constantly playing, so you have to catch momentum and keep going. Your body gets trained for that and you just keep working and switching on for the next tournament and the next tournament and the next tournament …” Sounds awful, unless you’re Wiese: “I love travelling and playing in all these different tournaments, and meeting new people in the different teams. It’s been hard work, but I’ve thoroughly enjoyed it.”

Did he feel he belonged anywhere, or was it all a blur of batting and bowling on far-flung fields punctuated by adding another layer to the crates in the garage? “I’ve played for Sussex for the past six years, so I’ve got a deep emotional attachment to them. I’ve always had a good time there and they’ve looked after me nicely. In the PSL, I’ve played for the Lahore Qalandars for the past three seasons. The owners have stayed the same, the management has stayed the same and they’ve kept the core base of local players. So you start building relationships with those guys, even though it’s only for a four or five-week period every year. But within those weeks you spend a lot of time together and you get to know each other well. There’s an emotional bond there because of the opportunities they’ve given me. They’ve shown a lot of faith in me by retaining me. You want to repay that faith to the owners and managers and everyone.”

Wiese hit the road in January 2017, when he signed a Kolpak contract with Sussex. He had played six ODIs and 20 T20Is for South Africa with middling success, and Dwaine Pretorius and Andile Phehlukwayo loomed as threats. “I saw that the door was shutting, not necessarily in T20s but definitely in ODIs. Dwaine had done well, Andile had done well.”

He had kept the Titans in the loop for “three, four months”, and had told them of his decision by the time he answered a call from CSA to hear he had been picked for South Africa’s white-ball series against Sri Lanka. “I was in a bit of shock, and I said, ‘OK, cool … Thanks’. The next morning, when I woke up, the media all over were saying I had signed Kolpak. I didn’t make that announcement. I had to phone back and say I was withdrawing.”

That doesn’t square with the conventional narrative of South Africa’s racially targetted selection policies forcing white cricketers to go elsewhere to stay in the game. “I felt that CSA had moved on from me and it was the right time to make that change,” Wiese said. “If I hadn’t signed Kolpak could I have played a couple more ODIs? Is the argument that when Andile took my spot, it filled a demographic need? But his ODI stats were really good and he deserved his position. My Kolpak move was never about me thinking the system had screwed me over. I had a family and they offered me a three-year contract; it was financially appealing.”

Although Wiese’s choice was revealed in the same few days that brought news of Kyle Abbott and Rilee Rossouw doing the same, he escaped the lashing they took in public. But he didn’t avoid CSA’s efforts to make Kolpaks unwelcome in South African cricket. “The way they treated us you can argue that we could have contributed more to the domestic set-up than what was allowed,” Wiese said.

The Kolpak era ended on January 1, and several previously vilified figures have since returned to the South African domestic fold. “For CSA it’s probably a good thing because they won’t be losing so many players. From a UK point of view, the Kolpak rule strengthened the county circuit. They can’t say we just went there and didn’t do anything. We made their players better by playing against them.”

Now what? “Could we get back into the system at CSA? Have too many bridges already been burnt? I’d like to think there is still a place for us in the South African set-up. Whether there’s too much animosity towards us for deserting and going away, or whatever, we’ll have to wait and see. I’d like to think there’s a bigger picture.

“Last year Andrew Breetzke [the chief executive of the South African Cricketers’ Association] got in touch with us and said they want to sit down with the Kolpak guys and mend fences so we could play domestically again to add experience and almost help out. I’d love to play another season in South Africa. The Titans will always be close to my heart and I’ll always consider them my home team.”

Home. Where is that, exactly? Maybe where the kit is. Until it’s in a crate in the garage.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Kolpak Kyle returns as admirable Abbott: ready to give back to SA, but not to play for Proteas

“As much as South Africans want to see Kolpak go, a lot of the English supporters didn’t want to see us there. We almost felt we were outsiders there, and I suppose we were outsiders here in South Africa.” – Kyle Abbott

Telford Vice | Cape Town

“What were you intending? My fishing or the way I look after Christmas? What were you trying to get at there? I’m going with the fishing. Thank you.” Kyle Abbott was joking. Wednesday’s news that he had signed for the Titans for the rest of the 2020/21 season was written up as the franchise having “landed a big fish” — not least because Abbott said he had been “sitting pretty comfortable in Durban [his hometown] doing my fishing” before the deal was sealed. On Thursday, when he gave his first press conference as a Titans player, he had the chance to ask reporters, clearly in fun, questions of his own.

The tenor was starkly different to Abbott’s last presser in South Africa, in January 2017, when he tried to explain why he had chosen to end his international career by signing a four-year Kolpak contract with Hampshire. He was 29. Despite competing for a place in the XI with Dale Steyn, Vernon Philander, Morné Morkel and Kagiso Rabada, he had played in 20 of South Africa’s 36 matches across the formats in the previous year, including half of their 10 Tests. Abbott’s decision sparked anger in South Africa. Unlike others who had exercised this option, he was in the prime in his career and he was being given the opportunities he had earned. What more did the man want? “It’s four years of security and playing cricket is an incredibly insecure environment for anyone,” he said then.

Had being left out of the side, for transformation reasons, for the 2015 World Cup semi-final despite the fact that he was South Africa’s leading bowler in the tournament been a factor? “Ever since I played professional cricket in South Africa there has always been a quota system,” Abbott said. “I have never used it as an excuse and I won’t use it as an excuse now. If you want to buy me some groceries in the next 10 years you are more than welcome to. I need to pay bills. I need to buy groceries. Are you going to buy my groceries?”

It didn’t help that, five days earlier — and five months after he had, unbeknown to his South Africa teammates, signed with Hampshire — Abbott had told another press conference: “The team’s in a great space and so am I. It’s exciting to see what’s going to come. There’s only 90 or so of us who have played Test cricket [for South Africa since readmission] so I count myself incredibly lucky to be able to do it. It’s the place where you want to play your cricket. When Faf [du Plessis] welcomed Theunis de Bruyn into the squad he said, ‘This is where you’re going to be playing your cricket; it doesn’t get any better than this.’ And he’s absolutely right. We’re enjoying our cricket at the moment because we’ve got that attitude of, ‘This is the place, this is where we want to play, this is the place we want to perform and really be tested’.”

Four years on, Abbott has put many more miles on the clock of lived experience. “People don’t realise that it was never an easy decision for any of us, having spoken to a lot of the Kolpaks,” he said on Thursday. “Even life over there is not as easy as people may think, from being away from home for six months to catching quite a lot of flak from people in the crowd. As much as South Africans want to see Kolpak go, a lot of the English supporters didn’t want to see us there. So there’s a lot things we had to navigate. We almost felt we were the outsiders there, and I suppose we were the outsiders here in South Africa.

“But it’s our jobs. I do understand where people are coming from. It’s an emotional thing. It’s a patriotic thing. I get that. It’s stuff that’s on our minds and that we take into consideration. But, for myself definitely, it was purely a career decision. I don’t regret anything.”

Abbott has taken 250 wickets for Hampshire in 90 matches in all formats. In 43 first-class games, he has claimed 183 at 18.78. He was county championship’s third-highest wicket-taker in 2017, joint seventh in 2018, and second in 2019. His haul of 17/86 against Somerset at Southampton in September 2019 were the best figures in global first-class cricket in more than 64 years. Unsurprisingly, Hampshire are keeping Abbott on their books as an overseas professional for at least another two years.

On Thursday he said county cricket had made him a better player than he had been when he abandoned his international career: “I’ve grown a hell of a lot there as a bowler, and probably as a person because I’ve been thrust responsibility. I was the go-to man in most situations and most games. The strength of the overseas players and the other Kolpaks you played against in most teams [made] the brand of cricket incredibly strong.”

In 2004/05, South Africa’s highest level of domestic cricket shrank from 11 to six teams. But CSA’s recent decision to restructure the model means 15 sides split into two divisions — with provision for promotion and relegation — are due to take the field in 2021/22, costing 76 players their contracts. But Abbott approved because the move would reshape the domestic game into something like England’s: “I’ve said for ages that the first-class system in the UK has to among the strongest, if not the strongest, in the world. The amount of teams that are competing every week for something can only strengthen cricket. In division one, the top four or five are competing for the trophy and the bottom guys are competing to avoid relegation. You might only have two or three teams out of it and not playing for much. To have that strength and competitiveness, especially in first-class cricket, is excellent.

“It’s been a long time coming that CSA needed to do something like this and put more value on results. In a normal season here, once you get a couple of rained-out games, especially in first-class cricket, and then maybe a draw, you’re out of [the running] and there’s no way you can get back.

“Now, those remaining games are going to be huge because no-one wants to be relegated. I’ve been on the brink of it in 2017. It went down to the last hour of the last day of 14 first-class games. It’s a horrible feeling knowing that you could go down and play in division two the following year.

“It’s long overdue for South Africa considering the amount of facilities that we have, from Buffalo Park [in East London] to up here in Potch; places that can host good first-class cricket.”

The Kolpak era ended on December 31, when the United Kingdom left the European Union, blocking a drain of talent from South Africa. How did Abbott feel about the hand that has fed him since 2017 being slapped away? “That’s definitely closed a door for a lot of guys, especially guys who have played a Test or so [for South Africa] and then 12 months down the line they don’t see a future anymore. That … can only be good for South African cricket — to keep the players here and to keep the system strong.”

And, he said, he wanted to do his bit in that cause: “Going into next season with more franchises opening, the more experience and the less watered down the system is, the better. We want to see South African cricket in a stronger position. That was one of my reasons for coming back and to play. I feel like I still owe a lot to South African cricket. Even if it is just here with the Titans.

“I’ve already got stuck in. Thando Ntini and I have had some great chats at practice in the last couple of days. I’m pretty happy and I’m excited to impart some of that knowledge back into the system and hopefully see South African cricket stay strong.”    

Did he harbour ambitions to use his acquired expertise to return to South Africa’s dressingroom? “It’s not in my immediate view. I’ve had a very tough 2020 not playing cricket [because of Covid-19 international travel restrictions]. So I just need to get back to the where I was 15 or 18 months ago. My objective is to get to playing professionally and back to the level I was at, which is proving to be quite difficult at the moment, I must admit. Although the body’s had enough rest, it’s been difficult getting a competitive edge back.” 

But that didn’t mean he wasn’t interested in his former teammates, and he thinks they’re on the up after an indifferent period: “South Africa and the Proteas are always close to me heart and I’ve always got an eye on what’s happening here. As onlookers we don’t know what’s going on inside the environment. But I’ve chatted to guys in the last couple of days, and asking how the national team’s going, and it seems like everyone in that environment is incredibly happy. They seem to think it’s in a very healthy position, which is great news.”

Abbott’s competitive cricket last year amounted to five overs bowled in two matches for the Jaffna Stallions of the Lanka Premier League in November and December. Lockdown at home in South Africa, he said, had taken its toll mentally and physically: “For the first couple of months I was quite happy. In my career spanning 12 years it was the first forced long break. I was enjoying the time off and not feeling guilty that I wasn’t playing anywhere or I wasn’t training or bowling.

“But when they started kicking off in the UK I started to itch. I missed it, more so from a changeroom perspective. My mates there in Hampshire, I missed spending times with them after games. These are the guys you live with, day in and day out.

“I found myself at stages incredibly unmotivated. I would sit for two or three days and think, ‘Why must I gym? Why must I run? There’s nothing coming up. I can’t see an end.’ I think a lot of professional sportsmen went through that at the time. To break away from that and from my home and come up here to the Titans was the change that I needed to try and get back to where I was nearly 18 months ago.”

Abbott’s downtime ends on Saturday, when he turns out for the Titans against the Dolphins — his former franchise — in a one-day game in Potchefstroom. If he does well enough to be summoned to a press conference, he can expect a full house of reporters. Not many players are as worth listening to, because so few say what they think so directly. Respect, Mr Abbott. And welcome back.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Elite schools new target for raiders of South Africa’s talent

96.43% of high schools that offer cricket in South Africa have produced only 5.78% of Test players.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

ANTON Ferreira’s phone beeped the arrival of a message: “Debut today for another Saints boy.” It was July 30 this year. Because of Covid-19 and the off-season, no cricket had been played at significant level in South Africa since March 15. It would be November 2 before the game resumed. The last time a South Africa team of any description had been at a ground was March 12, when the first ODI of the men’s tour of India in Dharamsala was washed out entirely.

The other two games of that series were among the first of the 61 senior women’s and men’s internationals cancelled because of the pandemic before England and West Indies hit the reset button in a Test in Southampton on July 8. It would be almost four months until South Africa played again.

So which boy who had gone to St Stithians, an elite school in Johannesburg known locally as Saints that has produced Kagiso Rabada along with Wiaan Mulder and David Terbrugge — and isolation-era notables Roy Pienaar and Dave Rundle — was making his debut on July 30?

Here’s a clue: Saints has also given cricket Michael Lumb, Grant Elliott and Brandon Glover, all of them Joburg-born internationals. None of them have played for South Africa at senior level, but they have represented England, New Zealand and the Netherlands.

To that list add Curtis Campher, who made his international debut for Ireland in an ODI against England in Southampton. On July 30. Ferreira had been sent that message by Wim Jansen, Saints’ director of cricket. Campher, now 21, had attended the school and developed his allround game there. He played at junior provincial level for Northerns and Gauteng, and for South Africa’s under-19 team.

Playing for an Easterns and Northerns Combined XI against Ireland in Pretoria in February 2018, Campher made Graham Ford, Ireland’s coach, sit up and take notice when he dismissed Andy Balbirnie. Campher also hit 38 of his 39-ball 49 in fours and sixes. Before the match was over Ford had established, by talking to the opposing coach, no less, that Campher had an Irish grandmother. And thus an Irish passport. The wheels to secure his services were in motion before the bus that took Ireland back to their hotel had pulled out of the parking lot.

Devon Conway has followed a similar path, albeit later in his career, to a place in the world more than 19,000 kilometres from Ireland, and without much help from his foreign friends. Also born in Johannesburg and schooled there, at St John’s, he played for Gauteng’s junior and senior sides, and for KwaZulu-Natal Inland, the Dolphins and the Lions. In March 2017 he batted for more than seven hours to score an undefeated 205 for Gauteng against Border at the Wanderers. Two days later, in a one-day game at the same ground and against the same opponents, he was bowled for a fifth-ball duck. It proved to be his last innings in South Africa. In August that year what he had discussed with his partner, Kim, on the golf course became true: they sold almost everything they owned and moved to New Zealand. Sporadic playing opportunities was a key factor in Conway’s decision.

Three years and three months later, minutes after he made 157 for Wellington against Auckland at the Basin Reserve, selector Gavin Larsen told him he was in the New Zealand squad to play three T20s against West Indies in a series that starts on Friday. At 29, he had cracked the nod.

To the strands of their stories that connect Campher and Conway, consider the fact that they both attended schools noted for turning kids into cricketers. St John’s counts Clive Rice, Mike Rindel, Russell Endean and Bruce Mitchell among its own.

No player has a chance of making their way in cricket without talent, but in South Africa that isn’t the most striking factor among those who get to the top. What matters more is which schools they attend. And, because of the imminent end of the Kolpak era and the stirrings of cricket entrepreneurship in the United States, it’s directly from those schools that many of the next generation of South Africa’s best could find their way to other countries — without bothering to announce themselves as senior players at home.

All 110 of the country’s Test caps since readmission in 1991 went to 56 of the approximately 700 high schools in South Africa that offer cricket, according to data provided by SA School Sports, a magazine and website. So, for the past 28 years, all of South Africa’s Test players have gone to 15.71% of the country’s cricket-playing schools. Seventy-one of the 110 went to only 25 schools. That means the other 96.43% of the cricketing schools can lay claim to just 5.78% of Test players, and that 64.54% of the players come from only 3.57% of the schools.

Other fine players those schools produce do not try to make their way in South Africa, because those privileged enough to be able to attend top schools are disproportionately likely to have access to a life elsewhere. “At the moment I can’t say to a kid, ‘Don’t go overseas’,” Alan Willows, a left-arm spinner for Sussex in the 1980s and now the head of cricket at South African College School — widely known as SACS and firmly in the Ivy League — in Cape Town, told Cricbuzz. “I’ve got boys whose parents have British passports. Would I tell a boy not to go play county cricket knowing he’s on a British passport? He’s allowed to be English, so it wouldn’t be a problem for him.”

In the past 10 years 54 cricketers born in South Africa have played for other countries. Only two of them also played for South Africa. 

At the other end of the country in Johannesburg, another noted nursery, King Edward VII School, or KES, faces similar challenges. “There are a lot of youngsters that haven’t come through the senior provincial and franchise systems, and have gone straight to England,” Ferreira, the man who received the message about Campher and KES’ director of cricket, said. “We keep hearing about them. Their parents get transferred, they go there, they join a club, it’s a global village. I had a dad phone me recently saying he’s trying to get his son to New Zealand. They’re all trying to play at the highest possible level, and there are only so many opportunities in South Africa.”

Ferreira, a big-hearted allrounder for Warwickshire and what was then called Northern Transvaal from 1975 to 1982, joined the school in April 2018. Before that, he spent 18 years at CSA as director of the national academy, the national under-19 men’s team head coach, and the manager of coaches’ education.

He remembers Kevin Curran, the Zimbabwe international, contacting CSA about the possibility of his then young sons, Tom and Sam, playing for South Africa: “They didn’t want guarantees, but they didn’t want to commit themselves and then find out that they weren’t going to play. They had the option of going to England.” Which, of course, they did.

“The problem at schoolboy level, I think because of the instances of this happening over the years, is that every parent and every kid who hears that some guy has gone all want to go, too,” Ferreira said. “Sometimes their expectations are unrealistic. They don’t know how the system works. But it’s also true that a lot of these kids know what’s going on. Their parents find out what they can do, where they can go, and they apply for bursaries. And especially if they are linked to a British passport.”

South Africans know this kind of story only too well. According to Andrew Samson, the guru of cricket statistics, in the past 10 years alone, at least 54 cricketers born in their country have played for Australia, the Cayman Islands, England, Germany, Ireland, Namibia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Thailand, Scotland, and the United States. Only two of them, Rusty Theron and Roelof van der Merwe, also played for South Africa. 

Given the danger of the country’s cricket industry shrinking because of the way the game is being run in a struggling wider economy, many more aspirant professionals could be lured away. Would you risk your future in a market in which it is increasingly unclear whether cricket will survive for much longer as a career option? Especially if you have the choice to go elsewhere?

The way to New Zealand is as open as ever, but the Kolpak window will close when the United Kingdom leaves the European Union at the end of this year. That will block one of the drains out of South Africa’s system. Already the ECB has punched a new hole by allowing counties an extra overseas player from next year, and there is nothing to stop the counties barring their foreign players turning out for their national teams while they are on their books — as they did with Kolpak players. And then there’s that other part of the world.

“A lot of agents are now shifting their focus to the US, where there is an emphasis on growing the game,” Chris Cardoso, a player agent based in Pretoria, said. “The Americans are looking to recruit players from a young age on three-year contracts — and in some cases as long as five years — to play in the Minor League T20 competition they plan to roll out, with the Major League to follow in the next year or two. These players will be put on a path to obtaining a green card and, eventually, citizenship. There’s a big drive from the organisers to recruit the most talented young prospects.”

How young? Of the 391 players who have signed for the 24 city-based teams spread across the Minor League T20’s four geographically organised conferences, at least 68 are teenagers. Eighteen of them — more than a quarter — are only 16 years old.

So those 25 schools should expect the levels of attention on them from outside their walls to heighten, and to find their alumni in unfamiliar places. Because how to get to the top and even what constitutes the top are changing. And not in a good way for the future of the game in South Africa, where chronic mismanagement and maladministration have damaged confidence in cricket’s ability to run itself viably. “I don’t know what CSA is going to do,” Ferreira said. “I’m loyal, I love the game, I love my country and I want to see us do well. But what we’ve been reduced to is scary. It’s worrying.”

CSA is unlikely to convince those who already have an eye on greener pastures to stay. But it can, and has a duty to, try to make sure more than only 25 schools are able to produce Test players. The focus schools programme aims to do that by supplying, in the words of a presentation at the domestic season launch last month, “varying levels of guidance as well as assistance in areas such as coaching and facilities”. The project started with 16 schools in 2016/17. By 2019/20 there were 33. They counted 83 players who were selected for representative girls’ and boys’ cricket weeks last year, up from 68 in 2018.

But these schools are a long way behind the ranks of the gilded 25, not least because the significant advantages most of the latter enjoyed as whites-only establishments under apartheid have endured into the modern, integrated era. Schools in historically black and brown areas have nothing like the facilities at SACS, the country’s oldest high school — which has given South Africa’s Test team Peter Kirsten, Alan Dawson and Dane Piedt — and KES, which lays claim to Graeme Smith, Quinton de Kock, Neil McKenzie, Stephen Cook, Dane Vilas and Adam Bacher. KES’ website says the school boasts “eight rugby pitches, four cricketpitches, three astro hockey pitches, five tennis courts, a rifle range, an athletics track and seven artificial surfaced cricket nets. At St John’s there are “five cricket grounds and an indoor cricket centre, staffed by professional coaches”.

“Even at schoolboy level, winning becomes so important. Everyone wants to be the No. 1 cricket school in South Africa, and it’s wrong.” – Alan Willows, SACS head of cricket.

Other formerly white schools are also ahead of the black and brown pack, and sometimes in interesting ways. Höerskool Waterkloof in Pretoria has produced the Malan brothers — Pieter, Janneman and André — and Hardus Viljoen. Willie Ludick wore the same blazer and played for South Africa in the 2016 under-19 World Cup. But he made his first-class debut for the Central Stags against Wellington at the Basin Reserve in March 2018. In June this year Ludick announced he was off to the US to try his luck in the new T20 tournament. Five other South Africans have also signed up. They include Piedt, who went to SACS.

How long before South Africa’s best players come from more than 25 schools? CSA can’t say it is making the most of the available talent until that happens. If it happens. “It’s spiralling,” Willows said. “There’s more and more distance between the so-called good cricket schools and the less good schools.”

Even in the leading institutions there are problems of culture. “We’ve moved away from the love of the game to thinking about what we can get from the game,” Willows said. “A lot of kids today are at fault, maybe because of their parents. They see guys in the IPL and in county cricket making lots of money. But how many of the guys in the schools are going to be at that level? Not many.

“As coaches, we’re at fault as well. Rankings become important. So you go out and find the best players in the surrounding areas. But you’re diluting all the other schools. The cream of the players go to the cream of the schools, and the rest get left behind. That’s not how it should be. I wish we could cap the number of players going into top schools. It’s difficult because parents want the best for their children, but what they forget is that they’re there to love the game of cricket.

“This country has special cricketers at its schools. What they have to do to keep them here is to understand what’s required. At the moment all they see is that they’re not getting into the provincial set-up. So they go overseas.

“Even at schoolboy level, winning becomes so important. Everyone wants to be the No. 1 cricket school in South Africa, and it’s wrong. It’s nice for parents, but they forget the love of the game. My job is to give the boys a love of cricket so that they will continue to play when they leave school.”

To help make that happen, Willows would like to see the returning Kolpak players deployed in clubs: “CSA has never had a better opportunity to put in place a project to move cricket forward. If you’re going to build the next generation of players, you’ve got to make club cricket strong.

“The guys I have who are good enough to play SA Schools [the South African Schools XI] will find their way into provincial cricket. It’s the other guys we’ve got to keep playing, and that’s where club cricket is so important.”

As a conduit to the higher levels of the game in South Africa, club cricket has fallen off the radar. Officials often refer to it as “recreational cricket”, a description as revealing as it is insulting. Many clubs struggle financially, not least because memberships are dwindling — a fact no doubt influenced by another: the Jacques Kallises of the day don’t play club cricket, as Kallis did before becoming a full-time international.

It is, perhaps, easier for Willows to talk this way than it would be for others. SACS is indeed the No. 1-ranked cricket school in South Africa this year, and as an Englishman he has that trusty British passport to fall back on. As does his son, Greg, an opening bat who was in SACS’ first XI but struggled to make the Western Province junior side. So he did what many before him have, and doubtless will. “I take my hat off to Greg,” his father said. “He was bitterly disappointed but he decided that, because he hadn’t made it in this country and he loves playing cricket, he was going overseas.”

Willows junior had a game for England’s under-19 side in July 2018, and if he hadn’t been injured he might have played against South Africa at that level in the same month. He has become a regular for Gloucestershire’s second XI and made his list A debut for the senior team against Australia A in June last year. Now 21, he would seem to have the talent to carve a career in cricket. In England, he should have the opportunity to do so. And, of course, he went to a good school. 

So did Ali Bacher, the former South Africa captain and veteran administrator, who was pleased to report that some things hadn’t changed. At least, not for the worse: “The school is in such good shape; the gardens the fields. The boys still say good morning to visitors.” Bacher attended KES, where his nephew Adam’s son is now a pupil. Bacher’s grandson is at Bishops, another noted cricket school, in Cape Town.

“The players are good and they’ve got good coaches and good support structures. It’s all run professionally. It wasn’t like that when I was there: the standard is better now. That’s our saviour. As long as schools like those are alright and that base is good, we’re OK.”

But, in different ways, other things are not the same: “I went to watch Adam’s son play at KES, and I saw the team — nine whites, one black African, one Indian. Around 35% of KES pupils are black, but they are not going for cricket. They’re going for basketball. Cricket takes too long; a whole day. The world’s changing.”

It is. But not in every sense: of the 38 South African cricket figures mentioned in this piece, only two — Rabada and Piedt — are not white. And it’s still true that talent isn’t what matters most for a young South African keen on a career in cricket. Where they go to school means more. They know it, their parents know it, and cricket knows it. So do those, from near and far, committed to searching out that talent.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Kolpak window closing, but South Africa’s are boarded up

“To make a living in the game, top cricketers don’t need South African cricket. That is worrying.” – Andrew Breetzke, SACA chief executive

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

NOT long ago the impending end of the Kolpak era would have been celebrated in South Africa. After 16 years in which 64 of the country’s players had chosen to further their careers in England, the balance would be restored. Too much of a generation of talent had been lost, but the drain would be blocked. Cricket’s coming home, South Africans would say. If only it was that simple.   

The Cotonou agreement, which allows players who are citizens of 79 countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific to work as locals in the European Union, expires in December. But the EU’s website says the organisation “will work towards a substantially revised agreement with a common foundation at ACP [Africa, Caribbean and Pacific] level combined with three regional tailored partnerships for Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific”. So South Africans who have taken up Kolpak contracts — which make them unavailable for national selection in return for not being regarded as overseas professionals with their counties — might have had a reasonable expectation of the arrangement continuing in some form.

But the United Kingdom (UK) is set to leave the EU at the end of this year, a truth the Brexit-supporting UK government seems determined to realise come what may. In less politically polarised times an economy hit hard by Covid-19 surely would have prompted negotiations for a delayed departure. One look at prime minister Boris Johnson’s hair should tell you sensibility isn’t high among his priorities. Kolpak’s days, then, are numbered: the only remaining domestic cricket in England this year is the knockout section of the T20 Blast, which will end at Edgbaston on October 3.

Of course, there will still be room for overseas professionals. But county cricket is suffering, along with almost every other industry, and will have less money to spend on such luxuries. That door is closing for players currently on Kolpak deals. Add to the equation the parlous state of the game in South Africa, which can only make prospective professionals doubt that cricket is stable enough in the country to be worth pursuing as a career, and it isn’t difficult to understand why the end of Kolpak is far from a reason to be unconditionally cheerful.  

“We already have current players asking, ‘Must I work on my plan B?’,” Andrew Breetzke, the chief executive of the South African Cricketers’ Association, said. “The fact that the South Africans in the IPL are pulling their weight in their teams is evidence that, to make a living in the game, top cricketers don’t need South African cricket at that level. That is worrying, especially when you look at the turmoil in the South African cricket landscape. Of course, the players have got to get to [IPL] level, and for that they do need South African cricket.”

The market is also being squeezed from outside the country, and more so than in other sports. “If you’re a Stormers [franchise rugby union] player and you’re not quite making it for the Springboks you can still get a gig somewhere overseas,” Breetzke said. “There’s a career outside of South Africa even for non-Springboks, but there isn’t necessarily a career outside of South Africa for the non-Protea. Every guy who makes it overseas has actually made it as a Protea. That makes a cricket career much more difficult.”

Considering all that, should South Africans be pleased that Kolpak is due to disappear from the cricket vocabulary next year? “From a SACA perspective, we always want to have as many playing opportunities and earning possibilities for our members,” Breetzke said. “Kolpak was one such opportunity. If you look at someone like Dane Vilas, it’s done wonders for his ability to keep playing as a professional. From that perspective, it is sad.”

Wicketkeeper-batter Vilas played a T20I and six Tests from March 2012 to January 2016. Although a quality gloveman and more than decent with the bat — he has scored 21 first-class centuries — Vilas had AB de Villiers breathing over one shoulder and Quinton de Kock over the other. In an age of superstar batters being turned into wicketkeepers, Vilas was always going to come third in that company. But since 2017 he has been able to juggle playing for the Dolphins with turning out for Lancashire on a Kolpak contract.

Now what? Vilas has petitioned the ECB to stay on as an overseas player for the 2021 season on the strength of the fact that his wife holds a UK ancestral visa. But a letter from Alan Fordham, the ECB’s head of operations for first-class cricket, suggests that isn’t a strong enough argument. 

The letter, which Cricbuzz has seen, is dated September 24 and is addressed shotgun style in an indication of how enmeshed Kolpak players are in the English system: “To first-class county cricket clubs, WEDS [Women’s Elite Domestic Structure] regional hosts, men’s Hundred teams, women’s Hundred teams, PCA [the Professional Cricketers’ Association], ICC Europe, Cricket South Africa, Zimbabwe Cricket, Cricket West Indies, Cricket Ireland”.

It confirms what has long been on the cards: “All Kolpak players currently registered as a regulation 2 [non-UK national] player will have their registration cancelled by the ECB with effect from 1 January 2021.” And that: “No further applications by any Kolpak player for registration as a regulation 2 player will be accepted (unless such a player meets the eligibility criteria detailed in the amended Regulation 2). And, with apparent reference to players like Vilas: “The above will apply regardless of whether such player currently holds, or is able to obtain, an ancestral or family visa giving them the right to work in the UK.”

Fordham makes the point that, “Should the 31 December 2020 end date of the [Brexit] transition period change, the above changes will be subject to further review by the ECB.” But that seems unlikely.

Having taken off his trade unionist’s hard hat, Breetzke could see the other side of the argument: “From a South African perspective, [the end of Kolpak] brings certainty to an area that has been controversial on various levels — financially and politically. As it stands we don’t have one Kolpak player who is contracted within South Africa; such has been the move towards not contracting Kolpak players.

“Now we’ll have a number of players who become available to be contracted domestically who previously, from a practical point of view, weren’t able to be. Legally they could have been, but that would have needed money from outside the franchise [salary] allocation and they never had it. Now you can contract Simon Harmer as a Warriors players from the allocation because he’s going to be an overseas professional [in England] and be a local in South Africa again.

“It opens up the game for South Africans coming back. It’s actually a positive for the strength of South African cricket. It takes away the issue of whether we should be supporting players who can’t play for South Africa, which was a very strong narrative.”

That’s not to say the future will be straightforward. “We will have normal domestic players who only have a domestic contract,” Breetzke said. “We’ll also have domestic players who are local but are foreign overseas players in England. And we’re going to have non-contracted South African players in the international market — AB de Villiers, Chris Morris; those guys. That does complicate how you’re going to select for the Proteas. Must the player have played in that domestic competition to be considered for the Proteas in that specific format?”

South Africans have cursed Kolpak since 2004, when Claude Henderson became the first player to agree to its restrictive terms. Now, as the end of the age looms, they might find they have new reasons to keep swearing.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

IPL gives South African cricket reasons to be cheerful

“International cricket kind of controls you, whereas I’m in control of my own destiny now.” – Colin Ingram, lusty left-hander for hire, on not having to put up with representation red tape.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

LUNGI Ngidi claimed three wickets in nine deliveries to derail Mumbai’s ambitions of posting a towering total, setting the scene for Faf du Plessis to nudge CSK home with an unbeaten 58. Kagiso Rabada took 2/28 to help stymie KXIP’s bid to reel in a modest target, then seized two more wickets and conceded only two runs in the super over to snatch victory for Delhi. AB de Villiers made 51, for many the key factor in RCB’s win over Hyderabad.

Three matches into the 2020 edition of the IPL, you can’t keep the South Africans out of the game. That is conveniently selective, of course. In the fourth match David Miller was run out without facing a ball on his Rajasthan debut. Jofra Archer launched sixes off four consecutive deliveries from Ngidi, two of them no-balls. Du Plessis hit seven sixes in his 37-ball 72 but took the first 19 of those balls to pass 20, probably because he was more focused on net runrate than winning.

Even so it remains true that players from the sharp tip of Africa are punching significantly above their country’s weight: only 11 of them are at the tournament this year. That’s not how it used to be. The high mark was 2012, when there were 18, or one more than the year before. In 2009 and 2015 they numbered 16, and 15 in 2010 and 2016. In the first dozen stagings of the cricket world’s most glittering jewel, South Africa averaged 13.42 players a tournament. So the size of their 2020 intake seems about right. But only in 2008, 2017 and 2018 have fewer of their players been at the IPL. There were also 11 last year.

The trend, then, is downward. Why? “Maybe it’s just perception, but I think there are more and more Australasians on the coaching staffs,” player agent Francois Brink said. “That might be why there is a bias towards players from Australia and New Zealand. We’ve also picked up from the South African coaches and some of the international coaches that the South African players don’t get into the tournament as much as those from other countries. Apparently they don’t get involved as much with team marketing activities and they don’t mix with the other guys as much.”

The latter is difficult to substantiate. How does nationality determine which players are more keen on a beer with the boys between games? But the notion that some of the South Africans may be held back by cultural considerations could be valid. The handbrake of conservatism runs deep and wide in our society.

Brink’s first assertion would seem simpler to prove. There are 17 Australian and New Zealand head or skills coaches on the eight teams’ staffs this year, compared to three South Africans. Maybe that helps explain why 19 Aussie and six Kiwi players, more than double South Africa’s ranks, are on the books in 2020. Thirteen of those Australasian coaches have been appointed since last July, compared to one South African — Jonty Rhodes, Punjab’s fielding coach. Over the same period Jacques Kallis, Gary Kirsten and Paddy Upton have all parted ways with franchises as head coaches. 

In 2012, when more South Africans than ever played in the IPL, they also counted three compatriots among the coaches. But only seven of the tracksuits were from Australasia. Then again, all of 26 Australians played that year. New Zealanders? Six, just like this year. So, go figure. Just to muddy matters more, only three of the IPL coaches in 2020 are English or West Indian. But there are 12 West Indians and 10 English players involved. Maybe the greater truth is that the IPL reaches beyond irrelevant factors like nationality and gives cricket an idea of what it could be if it puts itself in the right place at the right time.

“Cricket was crying out for that sort of entertainment,” Colin Ingram said of the advent of the IPL. “It’s gone a long way to putting the game into the entertainment industry, which is where we compete these days. We’re hoping someone spends money on us instead of going to a movie. It’s created a massive increase in cricket’s following.”

Did the tournament’s explosion into the game serve as a wake-up call for national boards about how they dealt with players? “In a small sport like cricket — if you’re comparing it to soccer — the international stage is still the most highly regarded,” Ingram said. “But to have some sort of competition pushing up standards and the entertainment value can only be a good thing. There’s definitely space for both.”

Ingram played 40 white-ball internationals between October 2010 and November 2013. He was the first player to score a century for South Africa on ODI debut, making 124 against Zimbabwe. To say the lusty left-hander batted like the farmer’s son he is is no insult: he saw past, through and around complications and found simpler, more elegant ways to crash the ball beyond fielders. Two more tons and a couple of half-centuries in his next 20 completed innings heralded big things. But the runs stopped flowing in 2013 when, having achieved all of his success at No. 3 and 4, he was promoted to the top of the order. He made 103 runs — 73 in one innings — in seven trips to the crease.

Ingram faded from that level and joined the Kolpak crusade and T20’s travelling circus. He has proved himself of exemplary service to 11 T20 franchises in seven countries outside the land of his birth. Only 22 players worldwide have scored more runs in the format, and only three of them have had fewer innings than him. For Ingram, T20 leagues have been the difference between playing cricket for a living and having to find a proper job.

“I couldn’t have envisaged how cricket would change from when I started playing to now. When I started everything was based around Test cricket. There’s another option now, and it’s worked out really well for me. After playing a couple of county seasons and taking the best option in front of me at the time, I didn’t want to sit at home through a winter or be in and out of cricket. Without international cricket, it was a good experience for me to go and play in other countries. It provided a great option in terms of cricket and experience, and financially it helps.”

Did having that choice take the edge off his desire to play for South Africa? “International cricket kind of controls you, whereas I’m in control of my own destiny now. When it got to the point where I realised I wasn’t going to come back and play international cricket, I embraced that fully. So I wouldn’t say [playing in T20 leagues] affected my hunger for international cricket. But it did drive me on. Without that, and with no international cricket, it would have been difficult to just grind it out, season in and season out.”

At 35, Ingram is in the autumn of a career he is keen to complete at Glamorgan. “I’m busy with contract negotiations at the moment as an overseas player, due to the Kolpak ruling falling away. Cricket’s meant a lot to me and I don’t like just playing for a pay cheque. I like the fact that there’s only one county from Wales, so you feel like you’re representing something more. I’ve found a really nice home among those people. If you wake up early enough, you could see me fishing in the river before nets.” 

That river would be the Taff, which hugs Sophia Gardens’ northern boundary and makes the walk to Cardiff’s ground, through Bute Park, perhaps the most beautiful in all of cricket. A scene so idyllic wouldn’t appear to have much to do with the breathless excitement generated by the IPL. And Ingram isn’t trying to curry favour with the tournament or its teams. He has played only 15 IPL games — in 2011 and 2019, for both versions of the Delhi franchise — and did not reach 50. But it is just as true that Ingram wouldn’t have been able to walk his chosen path without the roaring triumph of the IPL and the slew of facsimiles it has spawned.

There would have been, for him, less fishing and more farming. So, before we blame the IPL for taking players out of the rest of the game, let’s consider how many it has kept on the field.

Would figures like Ngidi, Du Plessis, Rabada and De Villiers still grace cricket, and our consciousness, if they didn’t have the opportunity, for a few weeks a year, to earn proper money and feel the sheer joy of competing rather than have to kowtow to invented nationalist nonsense?

You can take South Africans out of the IPL, but you cannot take the promise of the IPL out of South Africa’s players. Do so and see the game itself disappear from these shores.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Ashwin, Du Plessis conversation reflects South African cricket’s unrealities

“The best minds in the game in South Africa.” – Faf du Plessis on Graeme Smith, Mark Boucher and Jacques Kallis.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

CLEARLY, Ravichandran Ashwin thought the premise of his question was rock solid. Faf du Plessis, just as clearly, thought his answer was a no-brainer. Many among the cricketminded would have concurred with them. But not in South Africa, where what Du Plessis said could hit the headlines in ways neither he nor Ashwin doubtless would have intended.

The India off-spinner interviewed Du Plessis for his YouTube show, DRS with Ashwin. After a discussion about the impact the slew of retirements and Kolpak defections South Africa have suffered in recent years have had on their depth of talent, Ashwin said, “Mark Boucher has come back, and he was one of those guys who was very instrumental in South Africa’s earlier resurgence. And now he is there, meaning business all over again. How difficult is it going to be for the likes of Mark and, let’s say, Jacques to try and retain players to give South African cricket a boost so they can overcome this?”

Du Plessis nodded as Ashwin spoke, then replied: “Experience for players takes time, it takes a lot of games, it takes years to get there. But in a coaching staff you can get that overnight. You can get the experience into your dressingroom with someone like Boucher and Kallis, and even Smith as director of cricket.

“I think it’s the best thing that we could do right now to fast-track the experience process. But even with that it’s still a tough job. There’s still a lot of work to be done. But they are at least giving the players the best chance to perform, and that’s all you can ask for. The best minds in the game in South Africa — to tap into that and see how they can grow themselves as players as quickly as I had the opportunity of doing in that great team. Now you’re trying to replicate that in the dressingroom with the coaching staff.”

So far, so sensible. But, in the context of the debate that has raged in South Africa over the past two months, those are inflammatory views.

Between them, Graeme Smith, Mark Boucher and Jacques Kallis — respectively CSA’s director of cricket, South Africa’s head coach, and their batting consultant last season — boast 430 Test caps, 828 ODI appearances and 83 T20Is. They are among the greatest players South Africa have produced and they were key to their team reaching the No. 1 Test ranking in August 2012, weeks after Boucher’s career was ended by injury.

But Smith, Boucher and Kallis are all white. That makes them unpopular among large sections of South Africa’s populace, who have grown angry and frustrated, justifiably, at black and brown figures being denied opportunities. Consequently much of the national cricket discourse has fixated on race, with pointed segues into the legitimacy of Boucher’s appointment — rushed because of the imminence of England’s tour last summer, and for four years rather than the more usual two — and how much white part-time consultants are paid relative to black and brown fulltime coaches. CSA have said they will not hire white consultants if they can help it.

For Du Plessis — who is also white and as such was also born into the privilege that helped him make the most of his potential — to refer to Smith, Boucher and Kallis as “the best minds in the game in South Africa” will not go down well with the antagonists. Among them is the minister of sport, Nathi Mthethwa, who has complained about the unbearable whiteness of the upper echelons of the game.

That conversation is on a different planet from the hand-wringing about how South Africa are going to steady themselves with so many quality players having walked away. Smith, Boucher and Kallis retired between July 2012 and March 2014. Kyle Abbott, Rilee Rossouw and Duanne Olivier went Kolpak between January 2017 and February 2019. AB de Villiers and Morné Morkel played their last matches for South Africa in April 2018, and Hashim Amla in June 2019. Of the XI who raised the ICC Test mace in triumph at Lord’s on August 20, 2012, none are still playing in the format.

“You had the perfect storm,” Du Plessis said. “We lost all of our experience over a period of a year or a year-and-a-half. And then you had a lot of new guys coming through, who would be our best players once guys like AB and Hashim and Morné retired — guys like Kyle Abbott — leave to go and play Kolpak cricket. Duane Olivier did really well, and then he signs Kolpak. Rilee Rossouw was going to be our next AB de Villiers.

“Because we lost a lot of good players, and we had a group of good players retiring, the group of players to pick from was smaller. It’s not to say the guys weren’t good enough; we’ve still got a lot of great talent in South Africa. But if you have fewer players to pick from it means you won’t get the best of the best of the best. In India, you have a billion people competing for 11 spots. Those cricketers aren’t going anywhere. They all want to play for India. That’s their dream. That’s a flaw in the system of South African cricket. We’re desperately trying to see how we can improve it.”

Du Plessis took De Villiers’ departure particularly hard, and not only because the team he captained was losing a star player: “When AB left, it was really tough for me. I depended a lot on him, as a friend, and obviously as the best player in the team; we needed his skills. When he said he was done … as a friend my first instinct was ‘I’m here for you, and I’ll support you. If you feel like you’re at the end of your career and you don’t want to do it anymore, then that’s ok — I support that decision 100%’. As a captain, I was like, ‘How do we move forward without AB? How do we get the same performances?’

“But the friend in me trumped the captain in me. And I just said, ‘We’re going to miss you. Are you sure?’ He was like, ‘Yeah, I am 100% sure, I don’t want to play international cricket anymore. I don’t have the drive to do it anymore. So I am stopping.’ I respected that immediately and left it there. I never after that tried to convince him again, because I respected what he said. Even at times when we desperately needed him.”

Now Du Plessis himself is in the departure lounge, which he signalled by relinquishing the captaincy in February. “That was the hardest thing I had to do, purely because I believed that being a leader is something that was part of my destiny; it was my purpose,” he said. “And I’ve always enjoyed captaining more than I have enjoyed playing. I think I am a good player, but I think I really come to the party when it comes to captaining. That’s where I really love playing cricket. That’s what puts a smile on my face.

“And the last year of international cricket was tough, because I carried a lot of what was going through the team’s performances on my own shoulders, and I didn’t want to show that to anyone. Because in my own head, I’m the captain. I need to make sure I stay strong for the team, I don’t show weakness towards the team. So that was tough, because I didn’t have a lot of guys to speak to about it, a lot of experienced guys around me.”

Millions of Indians will always celebrate Ashwin for his skill and presence as a bowler and the ability he gained with the bat as he grew into his career. Clearly, Ashwin recognises Du Plessis as a cricketer in his league — a fine player and a great leader who deserves to be remembered with respect and admiration. But, to too many South Africans, Du Plessis is just another white man whose time is up. Ashwin should consider himself fortunate that he will never know what that feels like. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Kolpak is dead, long live Kolpak

While repeatedly delayed Brexit doesn’t happen, Kolpak will be with us.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

RUMOURS of the imminent end of the Kolpak era could be exaggerated by as much as two years, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic. South Africans who thought some of their best players would not be able to choose county over country from next year will have to hold their breath until the start of July to find out whether the arrangement will continue — perhaps until the end of 2022.

The United Kingdom (UK) voted to leave the European Union (EU) in June 2016. But their departure has been delayed three times, largely because of squabbling between rival UK political factions. Now it seems Brexit is set to linger in purgatory still longer.

As things stand the transition period for the UK to leave the EU is set to expire on December 31. But the UK could be forced to ask the EU for a postponement. The time, effort and resources governments have devoted to fighting the spread of the virus have left little for other priorities — even those as important as planning for Brexit.

“Under these extraordinary circumstances I cannot see how the UK government would choose to expose itself to the double whammy of the coronavirus and the exit from the EU single market, which will inevitably add to the disruption, deal or no deal,” Christophe Hansen, a Member of the European Parliament from Luxembourg who is on the EU parliament’s international trade committee, said last month. “I can only hope that commonsense and substance will prevail over ideology. An extension of the transition period is the only responsible thing to do.” The UK government responded with: “The transition period ends on 31 December 2020, as enshrined in UK law, which the prime minister has made clear he has no intention of changing.” But Downing Street said much the same thing before each of the previous delays, only to reverse their stance. 

The UK has until the end of June to ask the EU for an extension, which could last for up to two years. The EU would be only too happy to keep the UK on its books for as long as possible — the UK’s net contribution into EU coffers for 2018 was almost £9-billion.

The England Cricket Board (ECB) have told their 18 first-class counties that Kolpaks will no longer be considered domestic players after “the end of the government transition period”. So while the UK remains part of the EU, Kolpak will be part of South African cricket’s reality.

South African player agent Francois Brink concurred: “Logic tells you that everything in the world is on hold, so there is a good chance that Brexit’s implementation may also be postponed.” Until that happens “Kolpak can’t disappear; it will still exist”.

Graeme Smith, South Africa’s director of cricket, appears to have fallen prey to premature celebration on Friday, when he told an online press conference: “With Kolpak coming to an end the willingness is to always have our best players back in the system. With it fading away it’s really up to them players to back into the system and to make a decision on their career. From our perspective we want to encourage all our best players to play here, both domestically and then [to] give themselves the opportunity to be selected for the national side. That’s always the way we want to look at it. We don’t want to ever exclude players from being a part of our system. We understand that the landscape of the world game is very different now to what it was a number of years ago. So an open mind to how we look at these things is going to be key about we keep our best players — how we keep them motivated, how we keep them in our game.”

The Kolpak ruling, named after Maroš Kolpak, a Slovak handball player, who in May 2003 won a European Court of Justice case to enable him to play professionally in Germany, hinges on the Cotonou agreement, which allows the citizens of 78 countries — South Africa among them — to be regarded as locals when they work in the EU. Cotonou has been repeatedly extended since it came into force in 2003, and although the current version is set to expire at the end year it is far from dead. The upshot is that South Africans who play county cricket on Kolpak contracts do not fill the limited places reserved, in terms of ECB regulations, for overseas professionals. But the price is high: the counties insist that, for the duration of their contracts, Kolpak players relinquish their eligibility for their national teams.

Even so, 64 South Africans have resorted to Kolpak deals since Claude Henderson led the way in 2004. The UK’s strong currency, the superior professionalism of the county circuit and first-world living standards are the major driving factors. But some have sought to racialise the debate because selection for majority black South Africa’s domestic and nationals teams include a race component.

Some players have gone Kolpak in the autumn of their careers, others in the course of careers that were probably never going to reach the international arena. But a few have exercised the option in their prime, and after they have been blooded at the highest level. It’s those defections that have hit South Africa hardest, evaporating their pool of top talent and undermining trust in the system to retain quality players. The prime examples of the latter are Kyle Abbott, South Africa’s best bowler at the 2015 World Cup, and Duanne Olivier, who went despite securing a two-year contract with Cricket South Africa.

Others, like Simon Harmer, have been able to reach their full potential in England’s better resourced structures. Harmer took 20 wickets in five Tests between January and November 2015 before losing his place to Dane Piedt, who in turn was surpassed by Keshav Maharaj. Harmer first played for Essex on a Kolpak contract since 2017, and has been in the county championship’s top five wicket-takers in each of his three seasons. Last year he captained Essex to their first T20 title and finished as the first-class competition’s most successful bowler with 83 wickets at an average of 18.28. He was also the leading performer in South Africa’s first-class competition, for the Warriors, in 2018-19. No off-spinner in world cricket took more wickets than the 106 he claimed for Essex and the Warriors in 2018.

Like Kevin Pietersen before him, Harmer’s potential might have gone unfulfilled had he restricted himself to playing in South Africa — not because of any racially skewed political machinations but because English cricket is better equipped, in terms of finances, coaching and facilities, to bring the best out of players than any other country’s set-up.

Currently, Harmer is one of 17 South Africans who have Kolpak to thank for their county contracts. An 18th, Dane Paterson, is set to join them. Or maybe not. “He’s under contract with Notts, but it’s all on hold,” Brink, his agent, said, and cleared up earlier confusion by confirming that Paterson had indeed signed a Kolpak deal and not as an overseas player.

What with the uncertainty that has gripped world sport like the virus has the world itself, no-one knows when next counties, or any other teams, will play cricket. Nor whether signed, sealed contracts will need to be revisited or even cancelled.

Neither can we say that, once the Kolpak window has closed, the ECB won’t alter their rules to make provision for an additional foreign player on county staffs. Such contracts could well include a stipulation familiar to Smith and all cricketminded South Africans: that a certain category of overseas player will make himself unavailable for his national team. In the throes of so much change, so much could stay the same.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Paterson could become the last of the Kolpaks

“As a 30-plus year-old bowler you don’t have that many years left in you.” – Ashwell Prince sends Dane Paterson, freshly 31, on his way with a backhanded hug.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

DANE Paterson could become the latest and perhaps the last South African to take the Kolpak route out of the country’s cricket structures. Fast bowler Paterson, who has played a dozen white-ball internationals since January 2017 and featured in two Tests against England last season, is believed to be in discussions with Nottinghamshire.

“We’ve been informed he’s doing so,” Paterson’s Cobras coach, Ashwell Prince, told an online press conference on Monday, without naming the county concerned, when asked whether Paterson had agreed a Kolpak contract. “But he needs final boxes to be ticked by the ECB [England Cricket Board]. We’ve been told it’s going to be done.”

If the deal is sealed Paterson will become the 69th player to exercise the Kolpak option. Only 20 have not been South African. But the arrangement could be shortlived. The United Kingdom (UK) left the European Union (EU) on March 31, which spells the imminent end of the Kolpak ruling’s impact on cricket. Currently, the measure enables counties to thwart the England Cricket Board’s (ECB) rules on how many foreigners they are allowed to field. Kolpak privileges are extended to the citizens of the 78 African, Caribbean and Pacific countries whose governments are party to the Cotonou agreement with the EU. Essentially, Kolpak makes the citizens of 105 other countries — the remaining 27 in the EU and the 78 Cotonou signatories — English in terms of their eligibility to play county cricket. That will change on December 31 this year, which marks the end of the UK’s transition period out of the EU. So, unless the transition is prolonged, the Kolpak window will close at the end of the year.

But Paterson would seem to have a plan B up his sleeve. “He has signed a Kolpak deal effectively,” Cobras spokesperson David Brooke said. “He is just awaiting the final rubber stamp from the ECB. If Kolpak falls away then he will be playing as an overseas pro for the county. We have been requested not to mention the name of the County until Dane has had his final interview with the ECB to ratify it.”

The news has probably come as a surprise to Cricket South Africa, who it appears were under the impression Paterson had turned Notts down. But there is unlikely to be major disappointment about a player who turned 31 on Saturday leaving a country not short of fast bowlers. “As a 30-plus year-old bowler you don’t have that many years left in you,” Prince said. “I’m sure they sit down and calculate what realistic opportunities will they have of playing for the Proteas. If not, they’ll consider other options.”

Of course, all avenues for making a living by playing cricket — along with vast swathes of the global economy — have been thrown into doubt by the coronavirus pandemic. On Monday, Yorkshire revealed they had become the first county to furlough their players and staff. Salaries are covered for now, largely by the UK government’s job retention scheme, but the situation remains fraught with uncertainty. The most high profile Kolpak defector in recent years, Duanne Olivier, played his first match for Yorkshire in March last year.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Piedt signs US deal, and that’s good news

“I can go to a country that’s looking to improve their cricket and I can be part of that.” – Dane Piedt on his decision to move to the US.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

IN an era of Kolpak defections and players retiring to become travelling T20 mercenaries amid predictions of a dire future for cricket and cricketers in South Africa, Dane Piedt has found another way out. “To new beginnings,” he tweeted on Friday alongside emoticons of a US flag and clinking champagne glasses. His post included a photograph of him, a pen poised above a document, and a nearby celebratory measure of bubbly.

Piedt has signed a contract to play in the new Minor League T20 tournament in the US planned for the coming northern hemisphere summer. What the global coronavirus pandemic will do to those plans remains unknown, but the blueprint, announced in February, promises an event that will stretch across the country with teams in 22 cities. Piedt has a choice of basing himself in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles or Seattle, a decision he has yet to make — although the fact that some of his favourite basketball players are LA Lakers stars might be instrumental in settling on where he establishes his new home.

At 30, he has called time on a Test career in which he took 26 wickets in nine matches, the most recent of them against India in Ranchi in October. But Keshav Maharaj, who debuted more than two years after Piedt, has played 30 Tests and has nailed down his place in a team that rarely picks more than one slow bowler. Tabraiz Shamsi has made a strong claim to be Imran Tahir’s successor in the white-ball formats. Nobody needed to spell out the writing on the wall for Piedt, who told Cricbuzz on Friday: “Those guys have done well, and they’re of the age where they’re only going to get better.”

Rarely for an off-spinner, Piedt is an attacking bowler who bristles with variations. Also unusually, he has managed to become among the most respected as well as one of the most popular players on South Africa’s domestic scene, which made him a sound choice to captain his franchise, the Cape Cobras, at first-class and one-day level. He won 18 of his 46 games in charge, and lost 14. In 2018-19 he took 54 wickets at 27.74 in 10 matches in the first-class competition, claiming five five-wicket-hauls and two 10-wicket-hauls in the process. 

Those who might want to criticise his move should know that “I didn’t go looking for something else — this offer came to me”. And that he could have gone years ago: “When I was 26 I turned down a Kolpak offer [from a county he declined to name]. If I had agreed to that deal I wouldn’t have got the opportunity to take 54 wickets for the Cobras last year.”

For Piedt, moving to the US is a positive development and not part of the negative narrative that can seem to have entrapped cricket in South Africa. “I can go to a country that’s looking to improve their cricket and I can be part of that,” he said. And they are lucky to have him.

First published by Cricbuzz.