John Mogodi – Bulletproof Truth

All the presidents’ people

A roll call of the more or less reprehensible in South African cricket, recording their names and the context of their involvement.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

DESPITE mounting pressure from every stakeholder in South African cricket, along with the threat of either state control or international suspension — or both — two votes went against appointing the interim board at CSA’s members council meeting on Monday.

The council is the game’s highest authority in the country, and thus central to the shambles cricket has been steered into during the last three years. So it was surprising that it initially rejected, in a letter to sports minister Nathi Mthethwa last Wednesday, the get-out-of-jail card represented by Mthethwa’s proposed interim board. Only following four meetings after that was the light seen, and even then not unanimously. That does not bode well for the hope that the board and the council find ways to work together, which both have expressed.

Council members received a summary of Monday’s vote, not a breakdown. Cricbuzz has been told who the dissenters might be, and has asked them to confirm. Neither has responded. Even so, we know who sits on the members council, and how long they have been there — crucial facts in the effort to root out the rot.

The structure normally comprises representatives of CSA’s 12 provincial affiliates, its two associates, and CSA’s president and vice-president. Of the current members, five were part of the council on September 28, 2017: Rudy Claassen, Craig Nel, Donovan May, Rihan Richards and Angelo Carolissen. A sixth who was around then, Oupa Nkagisang, hasn’t been part of council business since December 2018, when CSA took control of the affiliate he leads on claims of maladministration.

The 2017 date is important because it was when Thabang Moroe made the unlikely leap from serving as Gauteng’s president and CSA’s vice-president to CSA’s acting chief executive, a vacancy created by Haroon Lorgat’s engineered ousting. Also crucial is that it was the board, not the council, that installed Moroe despite the fact that — CSA told parliament in October — he was not qualified for the position.

The board responsible for appointing Moroe comprised Chris Nenzani, Beresford Williams, Richards, Zola Thamae, Tando Ganda, Faeez Jaffar, Norman Arendse, Mohammed Iqbal Khan, Dawn Mokhobo, Vusi Pikoli and Louis von Zeuner, although Arendse missed key meetings because of ill health. Along with Moroe, Nenzani, Williams, Thamae, Ganda and Richards also sat on the council at that stage. Richards is the only survivor who was part of both of those bodies. He is now the acting president of the council.

When Lorgat left CSA, it had a bank balance of the equivalent of USD73.7-million and did not want for sponsors. Moroe was appointed to the job proper by the board on July 17, 2018. When he was suspended on charges of serious misconduct in December, having given himself sweeping powers, it was projected that CSA would be USD68.4-million in debt by the end of the 2022 rights cycle. Sponsors had either announced their impending departure or were scaling back their commitment.

Tebogo Siko, Anne Vilas, Ben Dladla, Xolani Vonya, Xander Snyders, Ashraf Burns, Dawid Roodt and Simphiwe Ndzundzu became part of the council after Moroe was appointed in a permanent capacity, and thus cannot be blamed for abiding by the board’s decision. Vilas, Burns and Roodt came onto the council between May and August this year — after Moroe was suspended — so are unsullied by this saga.

The same cannot be said for Claassen, Nel, May, Richards, Siko and Carolissen. May and Siko joined the board last year, in February and September, and Carolissen in September 2018, so they are even more culpable. They didn’t help appoint Moroe, but they also didn’t stop him damaging the game.

After months of unheeded calls for the board to go, Nenzani resigned as CSA’s president on August 17. He was followed by the remaining members on October 25 and 26: Williams, Carolissen, May, Siko, Thamae, John Mogodi, Dheven Dharmalingham, Marius Schoeman, Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw and Vuyokazi Memani-Sedile. But Carolissen, May and Siko are still with us as affiliate presidents and thus council members.

The point of this roll call of the more or less reprehensible is to record the names of those involved in South African cricket’s ongoing ugliness and to sketch the context of their involvement. It isn’t intended to make for sparkling reading.

The names of 31 administrators are recorded above. That only three of them — Vilas, Burns and Roodt — can be given a clean audit is an indictment on the state of the game in this country. And even that is conditional: we don’t know whether any or two of them voted against the sanity of allowing the interim board to be appointed.

As for the other, blemished 28, we know what you did last summer. And the summer before that. And the one before that. And before that. And in the winters, too …

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

72 hours that shook SA cricket’s world

CSA’s entire board has resigned, although some will roam the game like zombies. What made them go after months of bloodymindedness, and what happens now?

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

SEVENTY-TWO hours after Cricket South Africa’s (CSA) board were asked, not for the first time, to step aside and, also not for the first time, refused, all 10 directors had resigned.

The announcement that Zola Thamae, Marius Schoeman, Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw and Vuyokazi Memani-Sedile were out of the game was posted on CSA’s official twitter account on Monday morning.

They followed Beresford Williams, Angelo Carolissen, Donovan May, Tebogo Siko, John Mogodi and Dheven Dharmalingham, who quit on Sunday.

“After the Members’ Council had deliberated and resolved that in order to best serve the interest of cricket in South Africa, the entire Board should resign — which they did,” CSA tweeted. “All Independent and Non-Independent Directors have now resigned.”

What cricket’s stakeholders have been calling for since December has been achieved. Now what?

CSA are nominally led by Rihan Richards, the former board member who represents Northern Cape on the Members Council — cricket’s highest authority — of which he was named president on Sunday. But Richards could be reduced to a figurehead by Wednesday.

Sports minister Nathi Mthethwa will wait until close of business on Tuesday for CSA to argue against his intervention in their affairs. Whatever they say is unlikely to cut much ice with him.

Not so fast, sportslovers. Having allowed cricketminded South Africans to enjoy the moment of the despised board’s demise, CSA put out a lunchtime release that said: “All resignations are with immediate effect except for three members, namely, Zola Thamae, John Mogodi and Donovan May, who will remain as directors until the interim board structure has been appointed to ensure the continuity and stability of the organisation.”

The release also said Richards would chair this zombie board, which might not be with us for long.

Mthethwa will probably instruct the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (Sascoc) to establish an interim structure to control cricket, at least until CSA’s annual meeting on December 5.

Speculation on who might be part of this body is running wild, but it seems sure to include a respected former player and a figure who has high level experience with the International Cricket Council.

South Africans more interested in who is on the field rather than in the boardroom should be assured that the domestic season will still start on November 2, and that England remain on course to send their men’s team to the country on November 16 to play six white-ball internationals.

But what changed between the Members Council asking the board to go at a meeting on Thursday night, and being rebuffed, and Monday morning?

Because the players in this contest wear collar and tie and not pads and helmets doesn’t make the question any less intriguing.

The answer could lay in the weakness that has been baked into CSA’s organisational design. The same Members Council that asked the board to resign includes six now former board members — who opposed the proposal when it was debated.

But they were outvoted by the eight people on the Members Council who were not on the board, and it was resolved that the board should be asked to relinquish their positions.

That put the suits who were on both structures in an invidious position. They couldn’t very well refuse to enact, at board level, a Members Council resolution they had been part of, even though they had dissented. Once the decision to ask the board to quit had been made they were duty bound to walk the Members Council’s talk.

Even so, except for Williams, the non-independent directors will remain on the Members Council as provincial representatives.

That no doubt accounts for the jarringly touchy feely tone of other CSA tweets on Monday: “The Members’ Council thanks every member who diligently served on the Board and selflessly sacrificed their time for extended and often, overwhelming periods, to assist [CSA].

“The Members’ Council appreciates their commitment to cricket and despite the turbulent economic climate, CSA, under their leadership, received an unqualified audit for the financial year ending 30 April 2020. The Council wishes them well in their future endeavours.”

The undearly departed directors should be under no illusion that that sentiment is shared in the provinces from which most of them came, and to which they owed their places on the board.

“It’s a shit show,” Garret Perry, the vice-chair of the Nelson Mandela Bay Cricket Association and the president of Port Elizabeth Cricket Club, told Daily Maverick on Monday.

“Maybe it’s because there are people in important positions at CSA who have never played the game, or maybe because they are trying to make as much as they can out of cricket.

“But you get the feeling that people who do want to give back to the game and want to do the right thing — people like [former acting chief executive] Jacques Faul — are worked out of their positions.”

Independent directors are not part of the Members Council, so aren’t subject to the kind of pressure faced by non-independents.

But when the independent Dharmalingham — the only director who was willing to resign on Thursday — went on Sunday, the other independents, Schoeman, Kula-Ameyaw and Memani-Sedile, had nowhere to hide.

Dharmalingham, who chaired the finance committee, and Schoeman, who was in charge of the social and ethics committee, brought competence to a structure in dire need of exactly that. But the removal of Kula-Ameyaw, the transformation chair, will not be lamented.

Faul’s resignation on August 17 is understood to have been fallout from the publication in the Sunday Times of a full-page advertisement that cost CSA R521,000 — and which was placed at Kula-Ameyaw’s insistence.

The chief financial officer and the chief executive were required to approve expenditure of that size. Pholetsi Moseki, the CFO, at first opposed it but then made a curious about turn. Faul was never in favour, and maintained his stance. The advertisement was published nonetheless.

Dharmalingham boxed clever in his explanation to parliament on October 13: “As a non-exec director, we do not have any mandate to authorise any expenditure. So, from that perspective, Dr Eugenia could not have authorised that expenditure.

“In terms of the process within the organisation, any procurement goes through procurement and, depending on the quantum — and in this case the quantum was such that it had to be approved by at least the CFO and the CEO — in this scenario it was actually approved by the CFO and it was done within his mandate.”

The fact that Faul did not sign the purchase order, as he would have had to do for the money to be spent legitimately, was conveniently glossed over.

By then, it was plain Kula-Ameyaw was ill-suited to her role. On August 28 she told a press conference: “What I don’t like about cricket is they don’t predict how long they will play. Football is 45, 45 [minutes]; then you are done. I only watch the highlights of cricket, not the whole game. I don’t have time for that.”

On September 16, after Momentum, one of CSA’s few remaining sponsors, said they were ending most of their relationship with cricket, she tweeted: “Momentum forgets that we invest hundreds of millions in Momentum in our SOE [state-owned enterprises] and pension funds. I remember asking for the BBBEE [broad-based black economic empowerment, and affirmative action policy] certificate in my other board.”

Momentum are a Level One Contributor in BBBEE terms, the highest certification there is, and they have a BBBEE recognition level of 135%.

Kula-Ameyaw had ended her tweet: “Just check before you make an irrational decision.”

Sound advice. Clearly, it was not taken.

First published by Daily Maverick.

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Four more run … from the game … Nathi’s in the mood

“All resignations are with immediate effect except for three members …” – CSA take 10 steps forward, three steps backward.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

THE resignations of the remaining four CSA board members were revealed on Monday, a day after six others quit. That clears the way for an interim structure to be put in place by government, through its satellites, to run the game.

Former acting president Beresford Williams led the way out of the organisation on Sunday. He was followed by Angelo Carolissen, Donovan May, Tebogo Siko, John Mogodi and Dheven Dharmalingham. Only Zola Thamae, Marius Schoeman, Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw and Vuyokazi Memani-Sedile were left.

But, on Monday morning, CSA tweeted: “After the members council had deliberated and resolved that in order to best serve the interest of cricket in South Africa, the entire board should resign — which they did. All independent and non-independent directors have now resigned.”

A few hours later, CSA appeared to backtrack in a release that said: “All resignations are with immediate effect except for three members, namely, Zola Thamae, John Mogodi and Donovan May, who will remain as directors until the interim board structure has been appointed to ensure the continuity and stability of the organisation.”

The release said Rihan Richards, who was appointed acting president of the members council on Sunday, would chair the board comprising Thamae, Mogodi and May.

That comes after umpteen calls from a range of stakeholders, since December, for the board to go. And a day before CSA runs out of time to tell sports minister Nathi Mthethwa why he shouldn’t intervene in the game.

Mthethwa first gave the job of sorting out cricket to the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC), which in September told CSA’s now former board and key executives to step aside while a task team investigated the game’s ills. The board refused, and left SASCOC with the impression that it would unleash lawyers to avoid being usurped. SASCOC passed the buck back to Mthethwa, who gave CSA until close of business on October 27 to argue against him taking action against it — which could include removing the Proteas from the international arena.

Whether the board’s resignation en masse will be enough to stop Mthethwa from exercising the more extreme aspects of his authority remains to be seen, especially as executive staff like acting chief executive Kugandrie Govender, director of cricket Graeme Smith and company secretary Welsh Gwaza appear to be still in their positions.

It is unclear who will be on the interim committee, although there seems to be support for a senior player representative and an ICC voice. Also not known is whether the game will be handed back to CSA after its annual meeting on December 5.

What is known is that the domestic season will start on November 2, and that England’s men’s team will arrive next month to play three ODIs and three T20Is.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

CSA board resignations: too few, too late

“CSA understands and appreciates the board members’ reasoning behind their resignations, based on their love for cricket and their respect of CSA.” – CSA’s twitter account is in deep denial.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

SIX Cricket South Africa (CSA) board members down. Four to go. And they may yet go quietly into that good night when the game no longer has to suffer some of the most reckless, thoughtless, damaging administrators in all of sport.

Beresford Williams resigned as CSA’s acting president on Sunday, along with five other board members: non-independents Angelo Carolissen, Donovan May, Tebogo Siko and John Mogodi, and Dheven Dharmalingham, an independent. That leaves Zola Thamae, a non-independent, and Marius Schoeman, Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw and Vuyokazi Memani-Sedile, independents all. But already there are whispers that they, too, are looking to make like Donald. As in Duck, not Allan.

No doubt sports minister Nathi Mthethwa, who is waiting until after Tuesday to tell CSA what he plans to do to them for running cricket into the ground, has noted the exits with satisfaction. The rest of us will wonder what the hell took them so long.

CSA have been in trouble more or less since September 2017, when Thabang Moroe was named acting chief executive. Despite him not meeting the minimum requirements for the job, the board appointed him permanently in July 2018. He was suspended in December last year and fired in August this year.

And that’s only one of the myriad self-harming catastrophes into which the board have shambled. Most of the board members who made the Moroe mess had left the organisation before Sunday and been replaced, but the staggering level of denial needed to allow this to be posted on CSA’s official twitter account even as the blood gleamed wet on the floor — “CSA understands and appreciates the board members’ reasoning behind their resignations, based on their love for cricket and their respect of CSA” — proves the problems remain rudely alive and shockingly well. A public apology is the least of what is required, but don’t hold your breath: you’re dealing with something like that other Donald. As in Trump.

Since December, sponsors, the South African Cricketers’ Association, the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (Sascoc), Mthethwa, the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Sport, Arts and Culture, and too many ordinary, ticket-buying, TV-watching, hero-worshipping cricketminded South Africans to count have all raged at CSA’s board.

But, as recently as September 18, Williams was going nowhere slowly. “I believe I’m still committed‚ I’m passionate‚ and can still contribute and serve the game; I choose not to go,” he replied when asked, during a press conference, why he had not resigned.

“We as a board and as collective leadership have dealt with matters head-on and I do believe we’re moving forward as a collective. I’ll continue to serve until such time as the members council decides otherwise.

“I took a decision that I either move on or I continue to serve. I decided on the latter to serve the game that I’m passionate about. I’ve been a servant of the game at various levels.

“If there was anything in which I believe I acted irresponsibly or not in the interests of the game as a director‚ I would have moved on.”

Presumably Williams felt the same way on Thursday when he and the rest of his board went into a meeting with the Members Council, CSA’s highest authority, but which includes six members of the board itself. Resignations were called for, and not given — not least because, Daily Maverick understands, board members were advised by powerful figures within CSA that there was no legal basis to demand that they remove themselves. You heard the man: “I choose not to go.”

What changed between Thursday and Sunday, when the members council met with the board again? That is not yet known. Neither do we know what will happen next.

But we can be fairly sure Mthethwa will tell Sascoc to appoint an interim committee to administer cricket at least until CSA’s annual meeting on December 5. That is likely to happen after close of business on Tuesday, when CSA run out of road to avoid the minister stepping in. And so he should.

For one thing, four board members are hanging on. For another, four of those who have quit are still on the Members Council. For still another, CSA have invented the position of “acting president of the Members Council” and given it to Northern Cape Cricket’s Rihan Richards — a former board member.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Please, Mr Mthethwa, do your worst.

First published by Daily Maverick.

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Looming Mthethwa deadline flushes CSA suits

“I wish and hope that CSA finds peace in the coming months and cricket takes centre stage.” – Dheven Dharmalingham after resigning from CSA’s board.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

PUSH finally came to shove for troubled CSA on Sunday, when acting president Beresford Williams led an exodus of six resignations from the board. The mass walkout follows months of calls from various stakeholders for the board to go, three days after it refused the latest demand that it do so, and two days before government is due to say what shape its promised intervention into the game’s affairs will take.

Williams, Angelo Carolissen, Donovan May, Tebogo Siko, John Mogodi and Dheven Dharmalingham all walked the plank. Only Zola Thamae, a non-independent, and Marius Schoeman, Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw and Vuyokazi Memani-Sedile, all independents, remain aboard the burning deck of cricket’s listing ship. But there are indications that they might also be on their way out.

Northern Cape Cricket president Rihan Richards, a former board member, has been installed as president of the members council, CSA’s highest authority where each of the 14 provinces is represented.

Williams, who assumed office when Chris Nenzani resigned in August, also left the members council — which still includes Carolissen, May, Siko and Mogodi. Whether their continued presence, and that of the four remaining board members, will prompt tough action from sports minister Nathi Mthethwa remains to be seen. Under South African law, Mthethwa has the authority to withdraw the Proteas from the international arena. But that seems unlikely as Mthethwa, along with the health and home affairs ministries, has granted permission for England to tour next month despite South Africa’s pandemic regulations keeping the borders closed to travellers from the United Kingdom.

Dharmalingham, who chaired the finance committee and first tendered his resignation on Friday, is the only non-independent board member who quit on Sunday. “I wish and hope that CSA finds peace in the coming months and cricket takes centre stage,” CSA quoted Dharmalingham as saying on its twitter account.

Peace is too ambitious a goal for an organisation that has lurched from one crisis to the next for the past three years. If they weren’t in trouble for shoddy management they were in the spotlight for questionable governance, and all against a backdrop of plummeting finances.

What will probably happen next is that Mthethwa, who has given CSA until October 27 to furnish him with reasons why he should not get involved in cricket, will order the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) to establish an interim committee to run the game until CSA’s annual meeting on December 5.

A brave new world awaits CSA, which has already been transformed from what it was on September 18, when Williams was asked at a press conference why he had not resigned. “I believe I’m still committed‚ I’m passionate‚ and can still contribute and serve the game. I choose not to go. We as a board and as collective leadership have dealt with matters head-on and I do believe we’re moving forward as a collective. I’ll continue to serve until such time as the members council decides otherwise. I took a decision that I either move on or I continue to serve. I decided on the latter to serve the game that I’m passionate about. I’ve been a servant of the game at various levels. If there was anything in which I believe I acted irresponsibly or not in the interests of the game as a director‚ I would have moved on.”

It appears Williams felt that way going into Thursday’s meeting of the members council, where the entire board was asked to resign and reportedly refused. What a difference three days makes.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Précis of CSA’s forensic report summary: Moroe, Moroe, Moroe (and others)

Did Thabang Moroe, like Lee Harvey Oswald, Rasputin and the Loch Ness monster, act alone? Not quite.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

THE butler didn’t do it. The chief executive did. Not with a candlestick in the library, but with bumbling, badness and booze. Even a casual reading of the summary of the report of a forensic investigation into CSA’s myriad problems pins almost everything that has gone wrong in the game in South Africa since 2016 on Thabang Moroe, who was fired as CEO on August 27.

The unabridged forensic report was used to sack Moroe. Few beyond CSA’s highest authority — the members council — have seen it. CSA released the summary of the report, prepared by its own lawyers, on Monday. It runs to 46 pages and close on 11,000 words — in which Moroe features 71 times, invariably in a poor light. He is challenging his dismissal in court. Asked to comment on the allegations made against their client in the summary and on CSA’s decision to release the document, Moroe’s lawyers have not responded.

The summary damns Moroe for revoking journalists’ accreditation, for all but destroying the suits’ relationship with the players, for not keeping the board properly informed about action taken against provincial affiliates, and for dodgy appointments of rights partners, service providers and staff. And for losing money and spending too much, including on alcohol. Consequently, the summary says, Moroe broke the Companies Act numerous times, brought CSA into disrepute and failed to act in its best interests.

So, like Lee Harvey Oswald, Rasputin and the Loch Ness monster, Moroe acted alone? Is he solely responsible for CSA’s myriad ills? Not quite. Beresford Williams, CSA’s acting president, and Iqbal Khan, one of six board members who have resigned since December, are accused of breaking the Companies Act in potential conflicts of interest. Welsh Gwaza, the company secretary and widely acknowledged as CSA’s chief power broker, could be in trouble for failing to keep the board in the loop on key matters. The board itself “appears to be [in] dereliction of their fiduciary duties”, the summary says.

Little wonder, perhaps, that CSA is fighting the ever louder calls for the release of the full report — which was commissioned by and is owned by the members council, and thus is not a public document. CSA has said it has kept the full findings and the recommendations hidden because of legal considerations, but it is difficult to understand how custodians who really do have the game’s welfare at heart — and not their own interests — cannot see why making the entire report available is the only course of action that has integrity. But integrity is a slippery concept in an organisation in which, at full strength, seven of the 12 board directors also sit on the 14-person members council. Who’s guarding the guards? The guards.

Monday’s release of the summary follows a meeting between the members council and Nathi Mthethwa, the minister of sport, on Friday and precedes CSA’s scheduled appearance before a parliamentary committee on Tuesday. The latter promises to be as bruising as the former for a game that, in the wake of South African cricket’s Black Lives Matter explosion, finds itself in the crosshairs of a government desperate to use the moment to create distraction from more pressing issues, like its shambolic handling of Covid-19.

That comes in the wake of the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) being directed by Mthethwa to intervene in CSA’s affairs, CSA’s rejection of SASCOC’s demand for unfettered access to the comprehensive forensic investigation’s findings, which it says it would need in order to do Mthethwa’s bidding, and SASCOC reporting back to Mthethwa that, without financial help from government to force CSA to comply, it is unable to follow his orders. At Friday’s meeting, Mthethwa reportedly told CSA it has until Tuesday to give SASCOC what it wants. Whether CSA’s peace offering of the summary will be enough to placate SASCOC, and therefore Mthethwa, remains to be seen.

To be fair to CSA, what it has put out there makes quite some reading. The report, the summary says, identified 24 “areas of concern”. Tellingly, “structure of the board” is only 13th on the list of 20 such areas detailed on Monday, with “organisational design” at No. 16. Those considerations should be uppermost in a probe launched to “conduct an investigation into various governance issues and allegations relating to possible failure of controls and insufficient executive oversight within CSA dating back to a period of [48] months (2016 to 2019)”.

Plenty of such instances were found, although a representative for the members council, John Mogodi, said during on online press conference on Monday: “While we are not claiming the report to be inaccurate it is important to understand that [investigating firm] Fundudzi’s forensic analysis is a single-sided report, and not all of the individuals or parties mentioned have had the opportunity to provide responses to the findings as yet.”

Mogodi read a prepared statement, then disappeared from view without taking questions. And that despite having just said that, “In the interest of cricket and to mend relationships, CSA’s members council unanimously agreed to make the summary forensic report available to all … interested stakeholders, including members of the media.” Good luck mending relationships with the media by not sticking around for questions, which reporters were invited to send separately.

Maybe Mogodi wasn’t keen to talk about people other than Moroe. He spoke of CSA paying “service provider x” the equivalent of USD211,607 for services that were never received. CSA’s acceptance of a rights settlement fee for the 2019 Mzansi Super League caused losses of USD750,897. Not forgetting the USD3,931 Moroe spent on alcohol on his CSA credit card.

CSA’s former chief operating officer, Naasei Appiah, was also implicated. The summary paints him and Moroe as partners in wrongdoing — for instance, Appiah’s alcohol bill over four years was USD12,182 — which might explain why he was fired on August 16. But, unlike Moroe, Appiah was sacked after he had won an appeal against his suspension. That happened not least because several of the charges against him fell away. One example was the fact that CSA do not have a formal policy on credit card use. So who was to say how much could be spent on drink? Bizarrely, CSA insisted Appiah appeal again. When he refused to challenge a decision that had gone in his favour, he was dismissed. Now what?

“This [summary] report would have cleared me a lot quicker than the process I had to go through,” Appiah told Cricbuzz on Monday. “I’ll continue fighting my dismissal. If me and CSA are to part ways it should be a lot more honourable than this.”

Honour? That’s the code followed by butlers, not their employers.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…

Success! You're on the list.

Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.