Australia fly into T20 World Cup final on a wing and a runout

“The way I was batting, that was the only way for me to get out.” – Harmanpreet Kaur on her runout.

Telford Vice / Newlands

RARELY in the long and winding annals of bat-throwing has a specimen been hurled with as much vitriol as Harmanpreet Kaur unleashed at Newlands on Thursday. Her respiratory tract infection still stuck in her throat, her helmet ripped off her head, her eyes ablaze, she let fly with visceral anger.

Rather than a scene from a cricket match, it was straight out of a cage fight. Actually, it might have had her disqualified from a cage fight. Whatever else you do around this woman, do not get in her way.

The bat flew many metres into the outfield as if it had been spat out of Harmanpreet’s consciousness never to return, twisting and turning gracelessly through the afternoon air, then landing ugly, bouncing back up, and travelling further still towards the dark alley of shadow cast by the members’ pavilion, whose denizens would deplore such behaviour. Happily, hardly any of them were in attendance.

Don’t feel sorry for the bat. It was not an innocent. The damn fool thing had lodged itself in the pitch instead of gliding seamlessly across the turf and the crease, and causing Harmanpreet to be run out. It had earned its unscheduled journey to nowhere.

Yes, Harmanpreet should have angled her bat better to avoid her fate. Yes, players are taught to do what she failed to do when they are children learning the game. No, she didn’t deserve to be cast as the villain of her team coming closer than most to beating Australia in a T20 World Cup semifinal. She might disagree.

“If my bat didn’t get stuck I would’ve easily finished that run,” Harmanpreet said in the aftermath, stoney-faced and clearly still riled. “If I had stayed till the last moments we could have definitely finished the match one over earlier as we had the momentum. But even after that, Deepti [Sharma] was there, Richa [Ghosh] was there. I had the belief that they could do it, too, because Richa has also batted well in all the matches till now. But after I got out we played seven or eight dot balls in the middle and the match turned. Otherwise, we got a good momentum and the match was going well.”

In fact, India scored three runs off the next six deliveries after the runout. But she wasn’t wrong — that’s where the match was won and lost. Harmanpreet’s dismissal ended a stand of 35 off 26 with Ghosh, which followed her partnership of 69 off 41 with Jemima Rodrigues. When India’s captain took guard, at 28/3 in the fourth, her team needed 8.88 runs an over. When she was removed, they needed 40 off 32. The match was there for the winning. Until it wasn’t.

“My runout was a turning point. Otherwise we were in the game. Everything was going in our favour. It was a disappointment because the way I was batting, that was the only way for me to get out. The way I was meeting the ball, I knew how to take this innings to the end. From the Australian team’s body language, it looked like they had given up the match. But the moment I got out the momentum shifted.”

India finished five runs shy of overhauling Australia’s 172/4, but the truth of it was they had no right to run the perennial and defending champions that close. They had put in a shocking display in the field, leaking runs alarmingly and dropping three catches, and their bowling was scarcely better.

On top of that, the Indians weren’t sure their captain would be involved considering she had sought relief from her infection at a hospital on Wednesday. “Until the team meeting [on Thursday morning], we didn’t even know whether she would play,” Rodrigues said. “When I saw her dragging her bag I had just stepped out of my room, and I knew she was going to play. It’s not easy. Harry Di, from the time she’s come here, she’s been falling sick, she has injuries. And I’ve hardly seen her bat in the nets because something or the other was happening to her. Imagine the kind of thing she was going through, mentally. To come out there and play the way she did said so much about her mental strength and determination. She’s passionate about the sport and this team. And about winning.”

Instead Australia won their 10th consecutive completed women’s T20I, a stream of success that might have been 22 games long and stretched back more than 16 months had it not been for their loss to India in a super over in Mumbai in December last year.

Their bottomless batting produced stands of 52 off 45 between Alyssa Healy and Beth Mooney, 36 off 27 between Mooney and Meg Lanning, 53 off 36 between Lanning and Ash Gardner, and 24 off nine between Lanning and Ellyse Perry.

They spilled one catch, in the 13th when Healy lunged to where a slip might have been and dropped Harmanpreet off Darcie Brown, but otherwise handed down a fielding masterclass. The prime example was Perry, and the best of her sterling work came in the 19th over when Sneh Rana swept Jess Jonassen for what looked for all money like four. Only for Perry to swoop, dive, and flick the ball several metres back from whence it came, all in one magnificent motion, to limit the damage to two.

“We showed our class today in the field,” Gardner said. “We always speak about being the best fielding team in the world, and I think we really showed that. We took those pivotal moments when we needed to. Ellyse Perry was elite on the boundary, the blueprint for our side. Fielding could have been something that was the difference between us and them.”

But Australia weren’t at all assured of success when India reached a runrate of 9.30 midway through their innings — 1.30 better than was required, and with Rodrigues and Harmanpreet in full flow. It wasn’t so much that the Australians bowled badly, but that the Indians were batting with enterprise and intent.

“At the 10-over mark in India’s innings everyone had probably written us off,” Gardner said. “That shows our character and that’s why the best teams win from those positions. When our backs are against the wall we always try and find a way. Today we probably had no right to win at one point. They were cruising. And then we found a way to get some wickets.”

Champions do that. Great champions do it again and again and again. Australia, who have won this trophy five times in its seven previous editions and have reached the final seven times, are already in that category. They have earned a stab at being heralded as even greater champions.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Magical Muneeba follows insipid India, weary Windies

“It was difficult to be on the other end, but as a spectacle it was outstanding.” – Arlene Kelly on Muneeba Ali’s 102.

Telford Vice / Newlands

FOR most of their T20 women’s World Cup match at Newlands on Wednesday, West Indies and India seemed intent on proving a point in the game’s ongoing trudge towards gender equality: that women are as capable as men of playing dull cricket.

A sluggish pitch didn’t help, but that couldn’t explain the West Indians’ ooze to 118/6 in the face of disciplined although not overtly threatening bowling. Nor the Indians taking all of 18.1 overs to somnambulate to victory by six wickets.

The strike rates of half the 14 batters who took guard did not escape double figures. Only Shafali Verma, Smitri Mandhana and Richa Ghosh struck at higher than 120. No-one reached 145. Harmanpreet Kaur and Ghosh put on 72 off 65.

Deepti Sharma dismissed Shemaine Campbelle and Stafanie Taylor in four deliveries on her way to a haul of 3/15, which made her the first woman to take 100 T20I wickets for India. Karishma Ramharack’s 2/14 featured the wickets of Mandhana and Verma. Ghosh took India home with a 32-ball 44 not out. Taylor and Campbelle shared 73 off 74.

And that was about that. Had anything like a crowd been around they might have asked to be woken when it was over. Instead the ground was sparsely sprinkled, perhaps because the Cape Doctor — a strong south-easterly wind, so named because it is thought to rid the city of pollution and pestilence — blew hard enough to make Table Mountain vanish under a thick blanket of cloud.

Maybe this is churlish. India are one of only four unbeaten sides in the tournament after matches and firmly in position for a place in the semi-finals. So they earned a good, solid, boring win on Wednesday. So what?

“Our main focus was just to go and play according to what the ball was doing,” Harmanpreet said. “I know as a T20 cricketer, we always want to play aggressive cricket. But sometimes playing sensible cricket is more important than showing what you can do. That’s what we did today. Staying there is more important than showing aggression every time. The way [No. 5] Richa batted shows us how much strength we have in our batting. We need to spend some time and execute.”

Harmanpreet practised what she preached, taking 42 balls to make 33: “I didn’t show any hurry because it was a chaseable total for our batting line-up. And I had that self-belief that I could spend some time, and I knew we had a batter [Ghosh] who could execute. I knew Richa was in good touch. My job was to score a single and give her the strike.

“We are not worried very much about the result. We only want to go and execute, and we are going into every match thinking about that.”

There was excitement of the wrong kind after eight overs of India’s reply, when Taylor fell prone after routinely fielding and throwing a ball at short fine leg. She was stretchered off, apparently suffering from a back spasm. Taylor didn’t play in any of the Windies’ 17 T20Is between July 2021 and Saturday because of a back injury, and her departure in dramatic fashion on Wednesday was alarming. Late on Wednesday night, no update on her condition was available from the West Indian camp.

There was finally something to cheer in the second match of the evening. Muneeba Ali’s 68-ball 102 set up Pakistan’s 165/5, the second-biggest total in the 10 matches played in the tournament. Muneeba, bespectacled, slight and precise, scored crisply all around the wicket — 55 on the on side, 47 on the off — and unleashed especially mean drives over extra cover. She hit neither of Pakistan’s sixes but 14 of their 16 fours, and had the energy to run 46 of her runs. Charitably, the Irish bowled both sides of the wicket too often. But those runs still had to be hit.  

It was an impressively accomplished performance by a player who, in her previous 42 T20I innings, had a top score of 43 — her only foray into the 40s. Now she is Pakistan’s only female century-maker in the format, and an example to the Indians and West Indians who came before her for how to survive and prosper in conditions like these. 

Her batting done, Muneeba settled down behind the stumps, taking a catch and a stumping and keeping immaculately, and helping her team bowl out Ireland for 95. She was on the field for all but six of the 219 balls that constituted the match.

Considering only 11 of her first 42 innings had been on the faster pitches of Australia, England, Ireland and South Africa, how had Muneeba managed to more than double her best effort? Although she didn’t quite answer the question, her reply was priceless: “I don’t know, but these days don’t come very often. We don’t get these chances in international cricket regularly. I cherish this moment.”

She reached her hundred in the 19th over with a slapped drive into the covers that went through Cara Murray and kept going for four. Muneeba had help in a stand of 101 off 67 with Nida Dar, and from the sidelines: “Between the 12th and 15th overs I thought I could get a century because there were enough overs and I had enough runs. My teammates were telling me to go for it because you don’t get opportunities like this very often.”

Even the Irish, who are among four teams who have lost both their matches, could appreciate what Muneeba had achieved. “It was difficult to be on the other end, but as a spectacle it was outstanding,” Arlene Kelly said.

Batting like Muneeba’s is riveting to watch, regardless of the gender of the batter. But another, troubling, sign that the gap between women’s and men’s cricket is narrowing is the implication of Shohely Akhter and Lata Mondal in a scandal over fixing. Shohely claims, in an interview with Cricbuzz, that the affair is a result of miscommunication and Mondal says she has reported the matter to the authorities. But the mere fact that women’s cricket and corruption are being mentioned in the same conversation tells us this side of the game is being taken seriously by people who have, and who want, money.

Money or Muneeba? Which would you prefer? If teams strive to give of their best, to play with aggression and creativity and to do more than just enough to win sensibly, that’s no contest.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

WPL auction ‘elephant in the room’ at T20 World Cup

“What’s the dynamic to make international cricket and domestic cricket thrive? That’s the sweet spot.” – Heather Knight

Telford Vice / Cape Town

IF some players seem preoccupied for the first few days of the women’s T20 World Cup, there will be a good reason why. As New Zealand’s Sophie Devine said in Cape Town on Saturday, “It’s the elephant in the room. It’s enormous.” 

The auction for the inaugural Women’s Premier League will be held in Mumbai on February 13, changing the lives of the game’s best players. “We talk about glass ceilings and I think the WPL is going to be the next stage,” Devine said. “I am really excited about it. As female cricketers, this is something we have never been through before.”

By the time the auction starts, the T20 World Cup will be five games old. South Africa and Sri Lanka will open the tournament at Newlands on February 11, followed the next day by England and West Indies and then Australia and New Zealand meeting in a double-header in Paarl. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and the Lankans will be involved in another double-header at Newlands a day later.

The pressure on the players in those games promises to be an order of magnitude greater than anything they have yet faced. Will good performances by stars like Shabnim Ismail, Beth Mooney, Sophie Ecclestone, Amelia Kerr, Stafanie Taylor and Deepti Sharma enhance their chances of landing a lucrative deal? Might a first-ball duck or a match-losing over cause bidders to look elsewhere?

The Indians are caught between the rock of being confident that all of their players should get picked up, and the hard place of having to face geopolitical rivals Pakistan in their first match.

“Before [the auction], we have a very important game and we are just going to focus on that,” India captain Harmanpreet Kaur said. But she knew the auction was uppermost: “It’s a really big day for all of us because we have been waiting for years and years now. The next two or three months is very important for women’s cricket. We have seen how the WBBL and The Hundred help their countries to improve their cricket, and the same will take place for our country. It will be a great opportunity to improve cricket and grow the game. 

“But the World Cup is more important than anything else. An ICC event is always very important. Our focus is on the ICC trophy. These things will keep coming and as a player you know what’s important for you and how you need to keep your focus. We are all mature enough and know what is important for us.”

Australia captain Meg Lanning was also concerned with keeping her players’ eyes on the ball at the T20 World Cup: “We’re focusing on what we’re trying to do here, which is the most important thing. There’s no right or wrong way to go about it. Everyone will deal with it as they wish. We’ve spoken as a team about letting people deal with it how they feel is best. It’s about trying to embrace that and understand that it’s actually a really exciting time, and you don’t have a lot of control over it. We’ve just got to wait and see. We are trying to focus as much as we can on the cricket here and the rest will take care of itself.”

Heather Knight, England’s captain, is pursuing a masters degree in sports leadership and has written her dissertation on the rise of franchise leagues. She saw a steadily brightening future for women’s cricket: “Things are changing very fast. There are lots of franchise competitions popping up. The PSL is starting later, the WPL is kicking off and there’s going to be more and more franchise competitions starting and it’s going to create a really interesting dynamic. I think it’s absolutely brilliant for the game.

“The WPL is going to be a complete game-changer. The money that’s going to come in and the perceptions of the women’s game around the world … other boards will look at it and think I’ve got to catch up here. I really hope this accelerates the shift in a lot of countries.”

Knight hoped women’s cricket could show the game how to overcome some of the challenges being faced in the wake of the T20 explosion: “Franchise cricket and these tournaments are a really good thing, but what’s the dynamic to make international cricket and domestic cricket thrive? That’s the sweet spot. You’ve seen in the men’s game, it’s [franchises] have started to take over a little bit.

“I think in the women’s game you can have a really nice dynamic between the franchise leagues and international cricket. International cricket needs a bit of help to be able to do that but it’s a hugely exciting time. I am hugely excited for the future of the game and the opportunities that are developing not just for players. You see [former Australia top order batter] Rachel Haynes has been picked up as a [head] coach [by the WPL’s Gujarat Giants] and I think a lot of where the game has got to are those past players and how they’ve contributed to where the game is at.”

The unseemliness of people being reduced to commodities on an auction block was not lost on Devine: “On every scale, it’s going to be awkward. That’s the word we have spoken about. Some people are going to get picked up, some people won’t. You are going to get a value attached to what you are worth which, as human beings, it’s not the nicest, to be perfectly honest. But it’s also a job and it’s what we’ve put our names in for.”

Keeping the attention on the T20 World Cup with all that out of sight but definitely not out of mind will be tough, Devine said: “You’d be naive to think that it’s not going to be a distraction. It’s just how you handle it and the discussion each team and each player is going to have. It’s such an enormous step for women’s cricket. I am really looking forward to it but, also, there is a little bit of a World Cup going on at the same time. How we manage that is going to be up to each individual.”

For West Indies captain Hayley Matthews, the advent of the WPL was an indication that the public perception dial had shifted: “Women’s cricket is giving people a reason to want to watch. Before, you wanted people to support for the cause. Now you are 100% giving them a reason to support you.”

Of the 150 players at the T20 World Cup, as many as 45 could be signed by the five WPL teams: the 15 members of India’s squad and 30 from other full member countries. Each franchise will have USD1.46-million to spend. It’s a big moment for women’s cricket, but it demands context: an IPL franchise can lay out as much as USD11.5-million on playing personnel. That’s more than 10 times as much as a WPL outfit’s budget. Women have a way to go before they can claim equal citizenship in cricket.  

Cricbuzz 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.