Loosed in the Sky with diamonds

Joburg’s crowd can’t often be called fair, but they know winners when they see them. And they know how to give them their due.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

ABOVE us only Sky. Sky full of stars. Sky’s the limit. Loosed in the Sky with diamonds. Or, if you want something less obvious, Up, up and away, or Walking on sunshine, or Come fly with me.

How about some Jimi Hendrix: “Excuse me while I kiss the Sky. Or Bob Dylan: “No-one is free, even the birds are chained to the Sky.” Or another rock star: “Clouds come floating into my life, no longer to carry rain or usher storm, but to add colour to my sunset Sky.” Rabindranath Tagore always had the right words.

Excuse the gratuitous capitalisation. It’s what happens when the modern patron saint of cricket’s headline writers is cleared for take-off like Suryakumar Yadav was at the Wanderers on Thursday. Fifty off 32. The next 50 off 23. Seven fours in all. Eight sixes. They hurried into being a century that never looked like not materialising. It was ended the ball after it was made thrillingly real. And then, in the field, in the third over of South Africa’s reply, a turned ankle that brought the curtain down on Sky’s involvement. The pain. The poetry. Who needs verbs when you have pure vectors of batting like this.

Some deliveries Yadav hit, mostly to the off side, with visceral violence. Others, especially so fine to leg that they careened directly behind his recoiled back, his bat met with exquisite timing. Often the ball was chastened into areas of the field it should not, by all that is orthodox, been in. But this was not about orthodoxy. It was about what happens when the logic of hitting a cricket ball to maximum effect and efficiency disregards the received ideas of how to do so. Consequently, it’s as difficult to imagine Yadav playing like this in earlier, more stifling eras as it is to think those who would have watched him then would not have been just as enthralled by how he played.

It is also hard to imagine Yadav not enjoying every instant of his time at the crease. Even through the separation cast by a screen, his dealings with the press this week have revealed a man who is able to see the happiness beyond the pressures of playing not only international cricket but playing for — and captaining, no less — the biggest team on the planet. At 33 Yadav is closer to the end of his career than the beginning, but what a lot of fun he is going to have before he takes off his batting gloves for the last time. 

Would that more players brought Yadav’s attitude to the game. Then they might have some of his success: Thursday’s feat was his fourth T20I century, which earned him parity with Glenn Maxwell and Rohit Sharma for the most hundreds scored in this format. Note that Maxwell has had 35 more innings than Yadav and Sharma 83 more.

Not that we should allow such trifling details to obstruct our view of an innings that was of such shimmering power that the first handshake offered to Yadav after his fire had been extinguished came from Lizaad Williams, the bowler who had him caught on the backward square leg fence. Several of South Africa’s other players clamoured to offer their congratulations.

Yadav was carried to the boundary and beyond by the appreciation of a crowd, wearing many colours, that had come to see a cricket match — not to watch one team play cricket. On the evidence of this year’s men’s ODI World Cup, had Yadav been part of a foreign team playing in India, you fancy he would have left the scene to the indifferent silence of thousands blanketed in blue shirts.

The Wanderers’ honest generosity did not end there. Having watched the Indians pile up 201/7, the thousands stayed to see South Africa bowled out for 95. Mohammed Siraj started the first over with two slips and ended it with three. The South Africans were 42/3 inside the powerplay, and then lost 8/53 with Kuldeep Yadav tripping the light fantastic for a career-best 5/17.

Joburg’s crowd can’t often be called fair, but they know winners when they see them. And they know how to give them their due, which tumbled from the stands and grass banks in abundance for a side who inflicted South Africa’s third-heaviest defeat in their 169 decided matches in the format.

India batters and bowlers revelled in swinging and seaming conditions that were also true and fast. This theoretically most un-Indian of grounds is where the Indians have been most successful across the formats in this country: won six, lost five. At no other venue in South Africa have India won more games than they have lost.

Thus they will look forward to their return to the Wanderers for the start of the ODI series on Sunday, and doubtless be disappointed that neither of the Tests will be played there. But then the Sky is yours, India. You can’t ask for much more.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Behold, the throne of games

“Say that cricket has nothing to do with politics and you say that cricket has nothing to do with life.” – John Arlott

Telford Vice / Ahmedabad

DIFFICULT as it may be to believe, The World’s Biggest Cricket Stadium sneaks up on you. Once the tangled traffic of Ahmedabad’s centre is sloughed off, head northwest on good roads for Motera and see a street of villas here, a school there, a hospital somewhere else, a temple or two, or three, and a metro rail above it all.

Anything vast enough to accommodate 132,000, each in the splendour of their own plastic seat, seems far away. Then, suddenly, it looms. Rather it sprawls squat and fat like some kind of massive primordial slug fallen on its side, foot curled to head. Once within its billowing innards you could be anywhere. Think the Gabba. On steroids.

Those who prefer their cricket on a maidan, at a club, in a village or a meadow, near a beach or a tree, under the gaze of a mountain or a gasometer, or in front of a starring pavilion and a supporting cast of stands, are unlikely to feel at home here.

This is a stage for cricket as spectacle, a place to come and bay for and against gladiators, and where the batting of an eyelid — much less a ball — can and will be analysed by the 132,000 watching on the big screens until it has been drained of all meaning, real and imagined. Is it a place fit for a men’s World Cup final, white-ball cricket’s spectacle among spectacles? Indubitably.

On Friday it will be the scene of, comparatively, a much smaller deal. Afghanistan and South Africa will play their last league match of the tournament here. Barring events that would make Bollywood scriptwriters blanche in disbelief, the Afghans are going home. The South Africans have secured a semifinal against Australia at the Eden Gardens next Thursday. This is as dead as dead rubbers get.

But it will be watched nonetheless — most keenly if South Africa bat second, a role in which they have failed to convince so far in the tournament. Should they bat first, the contest could well be decided by the time the sun sets over Ahmedabad. South Africa have won 62.57% of all ODIs in which they have batted first, and 65.52% of all those they have played in India when they have batted first. This year they have 90.91% of those in which they have batted first. Ergo, South Africa have been significantly more successful when they have batted first.

Also to be noted, considering Ravindra Jadeja took 5/33 against them in Kolkata on Sunday, is how they cope with Rashid Khan and the rest of Afghanistan’s crack spin attack. Whatever they do, the South Africans won’t want to make a bad memory at a place they hope to return to for the final on November 19.

Afghan supporters will look for signs of life in the wake of Glenn Maxwell hammering an undefeated 201 against them at the Wankhede on Tuesday. Not only did Maxwell hit his way into cricket’s big book of classic performances, he also took away from Afghanistan what looked for all money like their fifth win in eight matches as well as their fourth victory over teams considered stronger than them. With that went much of the credit the Afghans had earned for beating Pakistan, England and Sri Lanka, former World Cup champions all.

And Afghanistan, not only as a team but as a country that is in the news alarmingly often for horrific and harrowing reasons that go way beyond cricket, can use all the positivity it can find. One such reason is the treatment of women in that society. It would seem an obvious topic for questions asked of their players at press conferences — until the likely consequences of their answers for family members in Afghanistan is considered.

There is politics at play, too, in the very existence of The World’s Biggest Cricket Stadium in this far flung place in western India, far from the brighter lights of the bigger cities. Which is not to necessarily cast aspersions on how it, along with the rest of the solid new infrastructure rising all over Ahmedabad, came to be here. Would that more elected representatives, if they reach high office, remember where they came from and who put them there.

“Say that cricket has nothing to do with politics and you say that cricket has nothing to do with life,” John Arlott said. He knew more than a little about cricket, politics, life, and everything else. What he might have made of The World’s Biggest Cricket Stadium would have been good to know.

When: November 10, 2023 at 14:00 IST

Where: Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad

What to expect: Plenty of dry heat, a touch of turn and not a lot of swing. Anticipate a first innings of around 280 — even England managed that — when the team in the field aren’t India, who blitzed Pakistan for 191 here. 

Teams:

Afghanistan

Fazalhaq Farooqi could return at the expense of Noor Ahmad, although Mujeeb Ur Rahman might need compassionate leave in the wake of dropping Glenn Maxwell on 33 in Mumbai on Tuesday. 

Tactics & strategy

A slow burn with the bat, a strong turn with the ball. The Afghans aren’t flashy at the crease, but they have been solid enough after being dismissed for 156 by Bangladesh: 272/8 and 284 against India and England, both in Delhi, 291/5 against Australia at the Wankhede. Much has been made of their spinners, but the seamers have claimed 21 of the 48 wickets taken by the bowlers. 

Probable XI: Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Ibrahim Zadran, Rahmat Shah, Hashmatullah Shahidi (capt), Azmatullah Omarzai, Mohammad Nabi, Rashid Khan, Ikram Alikhil, Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Fazalhaq Farooqi, Naveen-ul-Haq

South Africa

Andile Phehlukwayo is the only member of the squad who has yet to play a game in this World Cup.

That’s an arbitrary fact, but the South Africans attracted unwanted attention — politically and otherwise — when Aaron Phangiso was the only one of their players who rode the bench throughout the 2015 edition. 

Tactics & strategy

Bat first and bat big. There is no longer uncertainty over South Africa’s preferred way of going about things. That doesn’t mean they can’t chase or that their quality attack can’t hurt opposing line-ups if they field first, but they do better when the batters have already bullied a welt of runs into the scorebook.

Probable XI: Temba Bavuma (capt), Quinton de Kock, Rassie van der Dussen, Aiden Markram, Heinrich Klaasen, David Miller, Marco Jansen, Andile Phehlukwayo, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Gerald Coetzee.

Did you know?

— Pace has taken almost double the amount of wickets as spin — 28 versus 15 — at this venue and at a better average — 32.04 versus 37.93 — during the World Cup.  

— Pakistan and the Netherlands have conceded 300 in the tournament three times each, Australia, New Zealand, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka twice, and England and South Africa once. Afghanistan? Zero.

— Since these teams played their only ODI against each other, at the 2019 World Cup, Afghanistan have won 43.90% of their matches in the format and South Africa 56.86%.

What they said:

“As a team we feel proud. We are happy with what we did in this World Cup. But, as a captain, I wanted and I expected more. We should have done better.” — Hashmatullah Shahidi rues his team’s squandered chance to beat Australia. 

“It’s just that it’s being compared to what we have done batting first, which has been exceptional. We haven’t been horrific chasing; it’s one or two games where we’ve slipped up, which is part of the game.” — David Miller doesn’t believe South Africa are more beatable when they bat second.

Squads: 

Afghanistan: Hashmatullah Shahidi (capt), Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Ibrahim Zadran, Riaz Hassan, Rahmat Shah, Najibullah Zadran, Mohammad Nabi, Ikram Alikhil, Azmatullah Omarzai, Rashid Khan, Mujeeb ur Rahman, Noor Ahmad, Fazalhaq Farooqi, Abdul Rahman, Naveen ul Haq

South Africa: Temba Bavuma (capt), Reeza Hendricks, Aiden Markram, David Miller, Rassie van der Dussen, Marco Jansen, Andile Phehlukwayo, Quinton de Kock, Heinrich Klaasen, Gerald Coetzee, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Kagiso Rabada, Tabraiz Shamsi, Lizaad Williams

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Managing baggage key to SA’s T20 World Cup hopes

“Yes, there’s a lot of chat about the past and this and that. But it’s about controlling what we can think of in the moment.” – David Miller

Telford Vice | Cape Town

YOU could see a bedpost over David Miller’s right shoulder and, over his left, sunshine streaming through a lightly curtained window. There was no baggage in the view he offered from his hotel room in Abu Dhabi on Wednesday, but you knew it was there. It had to be.

South Africa have been to 22 ICC tournaments and won only one: the International Cup — nowadays the Champions Trophy — in Bangladesh in 1998. Often they have arrived as favourites and, too often, left having done as much as their opponents to beat themselves. Now that they’re at tournament No. 23, the T20 World Cup, how would they manage all that baggage? 

“I genuinely don’t like to overthink the past in the sense of taking on baggage and stuff like that,” Miller said. “The famous old saying is that you’re only as good as your next game. They normally say as your last game, but Hashim [Amla] always said to me as your next game.

“Yes, there’s a lot of chat about the past and this and that. But it’s about controlling what we can think of in the moment. I know it’s clichéd, but it really does help if you reset the clock and just prepare really well, and control each game as it comes.

“It’s difficult to win a World Cup. Only one team can win. So things have got to go your way. Yes, in the past things haven’t gone our way. But it’s not something we’re shying away from. We realise it’s a great opportunity to change our lives as players and as a team.”

Baggage there certainly is. How could there not be? South Africa’s players know that, even though seven of their squad of 15 haven’t been to a World Cup, a Champions Trophy or a World T20. Listening to some of those players in the past days, you would be forgiven for thinking South Africa had sent a squad of baggage masters to the tournament.

Here’s Aiden Markram last Monday: “We’re not bringing too much baggage into this World Cup. Everyone here is pretty free-spirited and not too fazed about being at a World Cup, in a good way. Everyone’s very calm so far. Obviously we’ll try not to make the same mistakes that we did in 2019, but this is a different format and completely different conditions, and we’ve got a completely different side.”

Here’s Temba Bavuma last Thursday: “In terms of previous South African teams and the pressure or label that’s been put on them in these sort of events, we’ve had those conversations as a team. We’ve accepted that those types of pressures will always be there until we bring back some sort of silverware. It’s not something that we have to carry on our shoulders, especially this bunch of players.”

And here’s Kagiso Rabada on Monday: “I don’t even actually like to talk about that — baggage or whatever. What’s happened in the past has happened in the past. I don’t want to talk about it too much. We have a challenge that’s in front of us. No-one has tried to lose games in the past, and we’re coming in with the same mentality. Whether we have baggage or not, it’s not worth talking about.”

Bavuma is among those who have no firsthand knowledge of South Africa’s pain, but Markram was part of the 2019 World Cup side — which lost five of eight completed games; the South Africans’ worst performance on that stage — and Rabada played in the 2016 World T20, the 2017 Champions Trophy and the 2019 World Cup.

Miller has played 30 matches in ICC tournaments since 2013: two editions each of the World Cup, the Champions Trophy, and the World T20. With 350 T20 caps, 90 of them earned at international level, he is easily the most experienced member of a squad in which only Quinton de Kock also has 200 or more T20s and 50 T20Is in the bank.

“There’s been a lot of chat about an inexperienced team, but I see it as a great opportunity where we’ve got a huge amount of experience, actually, in our team,” Miller said. “We’ve got x-factor players, guys who’ve travelled all the way round the world, and played in many different competitions. Even inexperienced international players have played a lot of domestic cricket. If we can just try and bring everything together onto one page, be nice and clear, controlling what we can control game by game, I think we’re going to go a long way into the competition.”

It’s not an easy argument to make because it isn’t clear how much experience is enough. South Africa’s squad have 1,900 games worth of T20 experience between them, 418 of them internationals. That sounds like a lot until it’s measured against Australia, who Bavuma’s team take on in Abu Dhabi on Saturday in their first match of the T20 World Cup. The Aussies have played a combined 2,403 T20s and 590 T20Is. Aaron Finch, David Warner and Glenn Maxwell have each turned out in more than 300 T20s — though none have seen as many as Miller — and eight of their players have 50 or more T20I caps.

But T20 or even T20I experience isn’t everything. Amla, a bona fide great of the modern game, played only 44 games in the format for South Africa and 164 all told. Miller shared a dressing room with him in 138 of the 349 internationals he graced, and in many others for the Dolphins.

“What I’ve learnt from him is to not let failure get you down,” Miller said. “Consistency in performance is what we’re striving for, but off the field trying to be a consistent person as well is what we need to strive for. That’s what I’ve really enjoyed about ‘Hash’ and his influence — being nice and calm, being there as a pillar of strength, the silent assassin; getting the job done but more so being consistent as a person. It’s been a good journey with him. I still keep in touch with him and will continue to do so during this World Cup if necessary for any advice.”

Sadly, for all his towering feats and rock solid character, and like every other former or current South Africa player, Amla will not be able to tell Miller how to win a World Cup. Amla played in nine ICC tournaments, all of them ending less than satisfactorily for his team.

As Miller’s online press conference drew to a close, his doorbell rang. Perhaps it was someone from room service bearing a silver platter of advice from those who have been there and done that successfully when an ICC trophy has been on the line. Or a bellhop to take care of the baggage.  

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Du Plessis, Miller seal SA’s series success, Rabada behaves

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in London

FAF du Plessis took himself seriously to help David Miller guide South Africa to victory in their one-day series against Australia in Hobart on Sunday.

A slew of records were set in a third ODI in which the visitors put up 320/5 before restricting the Australians to 280/9 to claim the spoils by 40 runs for a 2-1 series success.

On Friday, after Australia levelled the rubber with a seven-run win in Adelaide, not least by reducing South Africa to 68/4 on their way to a total of 224/9, Du Plessis made plain his unhappiness: “We let ourselves down with the bat, [I’m] very disappointed. We needed one more batter to stay with Dave.”

On Sunday, Du Plessis was that batsman, scoring 125 in a stand of 252 with Miller, who made 139.

South Africa’s total marked the first time they had topped 300 in the 39 ODIs they have played against the Aussies in Australia, and the partnership was the biggest yet made against the not so mellow yellow fellows in all 919 games they have played in the format.

The stand rescued an innings that teetered at 55/3 in the 16th over. It endured for 33 overs but also had its moments.

It might have been ended in the 27th when Du Plessis, on 29, late cut Glenn Maxwell and wicketkeeper Alex Carey failed to latch onto the edge.

In the 33rd Miller was given out leg-before by Aleem Dar to Maxwell for 41. After a lengthy mid-pitch consultation, Du Plessis signalled for the referral. But, according to the regulations, only the relevant batsman can send the decision upstairs. Miller then made his own, albeit far less emphatic, T sign.

And a good thing, too, for South Africa: replays showed the ball would have sailed over the top of leg stump.   

More than half the partnership — 148 — was struck in fours and sixes by a pair of batsmen who showed exactly the kind of controlled aggression their team will need if they are to challenge for next year’s World Cup in England.  

Mitchell Starc earned a record all of his own. His last over, in which Du Plessis smashed him over mid-off for six and Miller hammered a hattrick of fours through mid-off, midwicket and square leg, went for 20 runs: Starc’s most expensive over in his 75 ODIs.

Australia made a shaky start to their reply when Chris Lynn, who has batted at No. 4 in his other three ODIs, was bumped up the order to open, tried to drive Dale Steyn’s first ball, and jerked his head backwards to see Quinton de Kock dive and take the catch.

The Aussies were 39/3 when Marcus Stoinis joined Shaun Marsh to add 107. 

Stoinis slapped Dwaine Pretorius to backward point to go for 63 in the 30th, but Marsh made it all the way to 106 — clipped off 102 balls with seven fours and four sixes — before he skied Pretorius into the deep, where Heinrich Klaasen held on. 

With Marsh’s exit in the 42nd over when Australia’s hopes of achieving what would have been only their third win in the 13 ODIs they have played in 2018.

South Africa’s bowlers, who more than did their bit in the first two games, were overshadowed by their batsmen for a change.

But it didn’t hurt that Steyn claimed 3/45 and that Kagiso Rabada took 3/40, both from all 10 their overs.

Better yet, Rabada — who courted trouble in Adelaide by giving Lynn an aggressive verbal send-off — stayed on the straight and narrow.

Aussies pick six quicks for SA, one called Jhye

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

JHYE Richardson will have to get used to South Africans asking him how to pronounce his first name.

Richardson, a 21-year-old Western Australia fast bowler, has been named in Australia’s squad for the series of four tests they will play in South Africa in March and April.

He has played only five first-class matches and is, in his own words, as reported by ESPNCricinfo, “only 70-odd kilos and 178cm tall, so I’m not the biggest unit around”.

Little wonder that he lists another humanly proportioned fast bowler as an inspiration: “Someone like Dale Steyn, he’s proved to everyone that you don’t have to be tall and you don’t have to be a solid bloke to be able to run in, bowl fast and bowl well.”

Richardson has beaten Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins on the speed gun in the same match, and he has already claimed 21 wickets — and scored a half-century — in first-class cricket.

His inclusion would seem to be part of the Aussies’ plan, much like the currently visiting Indians, to pack their squad with fast bowlers: six of the 15 players are quicks.

That has meant there is no room for Glenn Maxwell, the off-spinning allrounder, and uncapped medium pacer Chadd Sayers — who both came close to playing in this summer’s Ashes.

Almost all of the Australians will arrive fresh in South Africa, what with David Warner the only member of the squad who will also play in the upcoming T20s against England and New Zealand.

The test series starts at Kingsmead on March 1, and by April 3 — when the rubber is scheduled to end at the Wanderers — maybe we’ll know how to say Jhye.

Australia test squad: Steven Smith (captain), David Warner, Cameron Bancroft, Jackson Bird, Pat Cummins, Peter Handscomb, Josh Hazlewood, Jon Holland, Usman Khawaja, Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Marsh, Shaun Marsh, Tim Paine, Jhye Richardson, Mitchell Starc.