Titans triumph in tight title race

“This was the most competitive long-format series in the history of our domestic structure.” – Pholetsi Moseki, CSA acting chief executive

Telford Vice | Cape Town

HOW big is 7.42 points in a soup of hundreds? Big enough to decide the champions of South Africa’s 2021/22 first-class competition. The Titans topped the standings by that margin when the last round of fixtures ended on Monday.

But, as late as Sunday evening, they were in third place. The leaders were the Warriors, who were a sliver of 0.44 points ahead of the Lions, with the Titans a further 2.14 adrift. As CSA acting chief executive Pholetsi Moseki was quoted as saying in a release on Tuesday: “This was the most competitive long-format series in the history of our domestic structure, with the teams fighting till the very last day of the series for the title.”

What happened between Sunday evening and Monday afternoon? Essentially, the Titans beat the Lions in Centurion and the Knights and Warriors drew in Bloemfontein. But there was more to it than that.

The Titans took the Lions’ six remaining wickets for 143 runs and then knocked off their nominal target of 62 to win by seven wickets. Central to that drama was Simon Harmer, who bowled more than a third of the overs the Lions faced in the match and took 6/84 in the second innings to finish the game with 9/168. The off-spinner’s sizzling summer haul of 44 wickets at 19.29 made him the competition’s leading bowler.

Mitchell van Buuren’s 103 not out had steadied the Lions’ first innings of 270. The Titans replied with 482, an advantage of 212, with Theunis de Bruyn scoring 143 and seamer Codi Yusuf taking 5/91. Van Buuren was also the Lions’ lynchpin in the second innings, in which he made 107.

In the other key fixture, in Bloem, — and based on Sunday evening’s scenario — victory for the Warriors would have seen them secure the title regardless of results elsewhere. Draws in Centurion and Bloemfontein would also have made the Warriors champions. Had the Lions won and the Warriors not, the Lions would have finished on top. If the Titans and Lions drew and the Knights won, the Lions also would have triumphed.

Rain prevented any play in Bloem on Sunday, so the visitors went into all or nothing mode and declared on their overnight score, which left them 61 runs behind. They had reduced the Knights to 82/8 in their second innings — a lead of 143 — when hands were shaken on the draw. Medium pacer Mthiwekhaya Nabe took 4/26 to finish the match with 7/71.

Patrick Botha’s 123 had served the Knights well in their first innings of 227, in which left-arm fast bowler Tiaan van Vuuren claimed 4/46. The Warriors slipped to 67/3 inside 20 overs before Rudi Second and Diego Rosier scored half-centuries in an unbroken stand of 99 that took them to what turned out to be their declaration total.

As for the also rans in the first division, Western Province beat North West by an innings and 132 runs at Newlands, and Boland and the Dolphins drew in Paarl.

Medium pacer Delano Potgieter had WP captain Tony de Zorzi caught behind in the fourth over of the Cape Town match with a solitary run on the board. But 128 by De Zorzi’s opening partner, Jonathan Bird, and 153 by Daniel Smith helped the home side total 576 despite Potgieter taking 6/87. George Linde claimed 5/69 and Kyle Simmonds, also a left-arm spinner, 4/24 as North West slumped to 202 all out. They followed on 374 behind and were dismissed for 242. No. 4 Senuran Muthusamy was last out for 101.

In the winelands, Keegan Petersen made 123 and Andile Phehlukwayo 107, and fast bowler Achille Cloete and leg spinner Shaun von Berg shared six wickets, in the Dolphins’ first innings of 422. Pieter Malan’s undefeated 219 — which confirmed him as the season’s leading batter with 601 runs at 120.20 in seven innings — allowed Boland to declare at 422/8. Fast bowler Eathan Bosch and off-spinner Prenelan Subrayen took three wickets each.

Northern Cape finished on top of the second division by winning three of their six matches and losing one. The leaders in the promotion-relegation standings after the 2022/23 season will move up to the top tier at the expense of the bottom team in the first division. Currently, the Knights are that team.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Christmas comes twice for Simon Harmer

“It’s about working hard and supporting the guys who will be playing, and adding value where I can – music in the changeroom, throwing balls, pushing guys to be better.” – Simon Harmer

Telford Vice | Cape Town

LIKE everyone, Simon Harmer has made mistakes. Calling yourself “the best off-spinner in the world” can only prompt eye-rolling and unflattering allusions to Right Said Fred’s “I’m Too Sexy (For My Shirt)”. Likewise, lamenting the “lack of opportunity” and “zero security” in a society unfairly skewed to give you more than your share of opportunity and security doesn’t go down without lumps.

But, considering what Harmer said in media files released by CSA on Monday, you have to hope he has absorbed the lessons of the realities that led to those errors: “Looking back, if you could impart knowledge onto younger players, or my younger self, it would probably be about self-awareness and understanding how certain things work; things that you can control and things that you can’t control. It’s been a process but I’m a better person for it and I wouldn’t change it for anything.”

Another learning was never to stop learning: “My dream was to play for South Africa, and once I’d achieved that I didn’t reassess — you’ve now achieved this goal. What’s next? So one thing I’ve done over the last few years is to make sure I’ve got goals every year. Some of them might be out of reach, but they’re things I aspire to each year and that’s helped me a lot.

“It’s also about realising that cricket isn’t the be-all and end-all. There’s a lot more to life. When I made my [Test] debut [against West Indies at Newlands in January 2015] I put so much pressure on myself to perform and to be that person. I was worrying so much about what everybody else thought of me — was I good enough? Now I’m a lot more comfortable in my own skin. I understand what I’m good at and what I’m not so good at; things that I can work on.”

Harmer is putting that into practice by studying towards a law degree — his next assignment is due on Thursday — in his quarantine hotel room in Christchurch, where he is part of the South Africa squad who will play two Tests against New Zealand, starting on February 17. Why law?

“I got myself into trouble when I was about 18 months out of school. I was kind of floating around and didn’t know what I wanted to do. My brother’s a doctor specialising in radiology. He’s always been a really good student. I’ve always been the black sheep — always enjoyed my sport, never wanted to be in my room doing homework. My mom was a tennis coach. So I always wanted to be outside playing tennis on the tennis court or cricket on the tennis court. I didn’t know what I wanted to do in terms of studying, and I got myself into trouble with the law. I found out through that that it’s quite an interesting field.

“I’ve always understood that I’ve got my time in the sun in terms of my cricket career, and one day that’s going to come to an end and the sun’s going to set. The corporate world is something I want to move into. I don’t necessarily want to be involved with cricket. I want to break away and have a different identity and do something different.” What legal avenue might he pursue? “Tax law is super interesting. There’s always loopholes and no-one knows the exact definitions and rules.”

An off-spinner with ambitions to become a tax lawyer sounds like a caricature of someone who is planning to fade into beige middle age deep in middle class mediocrity. But what was that about a prickly brush with the law? Harmer didn’t elaborate on the nature of the “trouble” and wasn’t asked to do so. Efforts to find out proved fruitless, except for the detail that the incident happened in his hometown of Pretoria before he moved to the Eastern Cape in 2009 to take up a bursary at Nelson Mandela University, where he began his first-class career in November that year.

Not quite 10 years after that, Harmer was quoted shooting from the lip smugly and unhappily, as in paragraph one above. That was almost three years after Essex announced he had signed a one-year Kolpak deal with the county. He blazed a trail of blond ambition in England, taking 72 wickets at 19.19 in 2017 to help newly-promoted Essex claim their first county championship since 1992. A year later, with his contract extended, his 57 wickets at 21.77 wasn’t enough to earn another title. But the 83 he claimed — the most by any bowler in both divisions that year — at 18.28 powered Essex to triumph in 2019.

Two days before that success was confirmed, Harmer captained Essex to their first T20 Blast trophy. And lead he did, taking 4/19 in the semi-final and 3/16 in the final. He hammered Worcestershire’s Wayne Parnell for consecutive boundaries to clinch the decider, and was named player-of-the-match in both games.

Not bad for an off-spinner who, having taken 20 wickets in five Tests, all of them in 2015, found himself frozen out of South Africa’s Test and even A sides. That Dane Piedt and Keshav Maharaj, the spinners who cracked the nod ahead of Harmer, are both brown became fodder for the fable that white players like Harmer aren’t treated fairly because of South Africa’s racially-based selection policies.

That Piedt earned his elevation for a Test in Harare in August 2014 by taking 55 wickets at 18.52 in the 2013/14 franchise season, when Harmer claimed 40 at 35.72, isn’t often acknowledged. Harmer would have had a better argument about being overlooked in favour of Maharaj for the series in Australia in November 2016. In 2015/16, Maharaj bowled 409 overs for the Dolphins to take 36 at 32.00. Harmer had 31 at 22.41, and in 282 overs: just more than two-thirds’ Maharaj’s total. But Piedt, who took 39 at 22.33 in 261 overs that season, was also not in the squad.

As for the widespread bleating about CSA’s target of at least six black and brown players, a minimum of three of them black, in every South Africa XI, that leaves five places uncategorised. So whites, who make up less than 10% of South Africa’s population and have access to the best facilities and coaching, are able to compete untrammelled for almost half the number of spots in the national team. Thus they have been gifted close to 40% more berths than they represent demographically. In a country where exponentially more black and brown people play and follow cricket than whites, that is overly generous affirmative action.

But numbers don’t play and follow cricket. People do. And all of them, at least some of the time, let wrongheaded ideas cloud their thinking. Kolpak allowed some of those ideas to fester and swell. Like the anger and resentment that dogged players who followed that path because it precluded them from playing international cricket. That was unfair, because the stipulation was made not by the players but by the counties. So shout at Essex, not Harmer. Yes, he agreed to play under those terms. Why not? This is about professionalism, not patriotism.  

Besides, Kolpak did much for the careers of players like Harmer. Who’s to say he would have become the fine cricketer he is, and the more mature man he has grown into, were it not for the superior and better resourced coaching and support structures available to him in England? Conversely, would Alastair Cook have become Alastair Cook had he been born in and remained in South Africa? South Africa and England compete as equals at international level, but England’s cricket industry towers over South Africa’s in every sense.

At the end of 2020 the Kolpak door banged shut and was locked, and the key was thrown away. If Harmer, Duanne Olivier, Kyle Abbott and the like wanted to keep playing cricket for a living, they had to return to the scene of their uncertainty to confront their own fragility. Or hope to land a contract as an overseas professional, as Harmer has done. Parnell, Olivier and Harmer have since been picked for South Africa.

“One thing I’ve come to realise getting older as a cricketer is that things change and happen very quickly,” Harmer said. “One day you could be sitting extremely frustrated and not knowing where you are, and very quickly you could be back into a professional or an international environment.”

But not necessarily play in that environment. Harmer is the leading wicket-taker in domestic first-class cricket in South Africa this season, with 35 at 19.45 in six matches. Even so, he knows he is in Christchurch because George Linde is preparing for his wedding and Prenelan Subrayen has a groin injury. He also knows he is unlikely to be chosen over Maharaj.  

“This opportunity has arisen because things have happened, but that’s how sport works,” Harmer said. “I’m under no illusion as to why I’m here and how I got the opportunity. But I am here now. I’ve got to try and show people what I’m about, what my brand is about. It’s been a long time since I was involved in the set-up and I think I’ve matured a lot. I understand what I need to do and how I need to go about it.

“Hagley Oval is probably the greenest, quickest, bounciest wicket in New Zealand. So the chances of us playing two spinners are very low. ‘Kesh’ has done extremely well in his international career so far. I’m always going to be a supporting act to him. For this tour, it’s about working hard and supporting the guys who will be playing, and adding value where I can — music in the changeroom, throwing balls, pushing guys to be better.”

Mistakes he has made, lessons he has learnt, and growth he has had. But Harmer cannot be accused of doing an Olivier — who had his original Test cap put in a glass frame after he thought his international career was over when he went Kolpak for Yorkshire in February 2019. Only to be selected for the series against India in December and January. He had to be presented with a new cap.

Where is Harmer’s cap? “It’s in my bag, here in the room. I’ve got all my caps that I’ve played in right through age-group cricket. My brother and I have this pact that, one day, if everything goes according to plan, we’ll have a beach house. And the bar in that beach house is where all the memorabilia will go. All my South African stuff is in the bag that I was given when I made my debut. I wasn’t sure it would see the light of day again. Fortunately it has. It was sitting in Kenton-on-Sea [in the Eastern Cape]. I got my mother-in-law to post it up to me in Pretoria, and it’s made the trip over to New Zealand.”

If that isn’t enough to convince you that Harmer didn’t throw away his South Africaness when he went to play for Essex, or betray anyone or anything, or blaspheme against an unwritten code of how players should conduct themselves, he also said: “I don’t know whether every cricketer feels this way, but there’s something special about getting your new kit for the season; whether it’s for your domestic team or county team or, like this, getting an international call-up. Things have changed since I last played. Now you get your name and number on the back of your shirt.

“That cliché about feeling like a kid at Christmas, that’s exactly how it is. You’re opening up this bag, you don’t know what’s going to be in it, you see all this kit — your playing shirts, the warm-up kit. The South African badge is on it. It’s a really special and exciting time to get that kit and pack it all into a bag and get ready for an overseas trip.”

And so we leave the kid who hated being stuck inside now alone in a room and marooned under several layers of quarantine regulations, finishing a university assignment due on his 33rd birthday. How will the South Africans smuggle a cake into a stifling space where, Harmer said, “pre-ordered meals arrive in a brown bag”? How will Harmer light 33 candles indoors in health-and-safety obsessed New Zealand, where there seem to be more smoke detectors than sheep?

Happily, questions like those are not of the dire sort Harmer has likely pondered in recent years. And to which, it seems, he has found satisfying enough answers. Or at least earned the chance to show he has fixed his mistakes and to remind us of those made against him.
Welcome back, young man. Merry Christmas for the other day and happy birthday for Thursday. Please stay out of trouble.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Does the A team plan come together?

“I sat in a South Africa A changeroom telling everyone this is the next-best XI. There was an injury in the Test team not a week later and no-one got the call-up.” – Stephen Cook

Telford Vice | Cape Town

Cricket is famously big on numbers. Think of a novel way of crunching them and some accountant in pads probably has been there, done that and plugged the equation into the game’s grand statosphere. But here’s one that will no doubt dip below the radar. And it features a century, no less.

When South Africa A next take the field in a first-class match, they will do so for the 100th time. Of the flood of facts cricket sends our way, that is sure to wash past us unnoticed. Who could care that a team few beyond the players and their coaches and parents think about will bring up a century of games?

Jimmy Cook, for a start. Aged 40, he captained South Africa A in the first of those 99 matches, against England A at St George’s Park in January 1994. The home side included Mickey Arthur and Eric Simons, and they faced Darren Gough and Peter Such. Here’s how Cook recalled the occasion in conversation with Cricbuzz: “I played one game [for South Africa A]. It was against England … or perhaps England A, or something like that. Down in PE [Gqeberha]. It was later in my career, and they probably wanted one or two experienced guys to go with the youngsters.”

Many would forgive Cook his fuzzy memory. In 1994, no-one quite knew what to do with this strange new thing called A team cricket. Was it a reward for stalwart servants of the game who had never cracked it at the highest level? Was it a testing ground for the next generation of internationals that offered something they couldn’t experience in domestic competition? Why was it called A team cricket when, clearly, it was played by B teams?

Almost 28 years on, not a lot would seem to have changed. On Thursday the A teams of South Africa and India completed a series of three four-day matches in Bloemfontein. The games weren’t on television — they were streamed online — and garnered scant media coverage. Without trying to be nasty to Bloem, a small, sleepy city deep in the belly of South Africa’s inland plateau, not many people there would have noticed if something was or wasn’t happening at the local cricket ground.

It didn’t help that all of the matches were drawn, and not in interesting ways. The first, when rain prevented any play on the fourth day, never reached the third innings. The Indians chased targets in the last two games, but neither side challenged for victory. Pieter Malan, Tony de Zorzi, Zubayr Hamza and Abhimanyu Easwaran scored centuries, and Lutho Sipamla claimed the only five-wicket haul. What, exactly, was the point?

“You can bring in younger guys, and if you have a South Africa batsman who’s out of form he can play in those types of games,” Cook said. “It’s probably a slightly higher standard than you would have in a provincial game, especially when the international players are not involved in the domestic stuff. It’s a worthwhile thing to have.”

To make his point, Cook recalled his initial glimpse of Aiden Markram: “I remember going to watch Stephen [Cook, his son] play for South Africa A, and that’s where I saw Markram bat for the first time. I said to Stephen, ‘This oke [bloke] has got South Africa written all over him.’ That was a valuable introduction for him. He could play at a slightly higher level and get used to it, and then come into the Test team and play so well.”

Cook the younger might want to have a word with his father about that. He and Markram opened the batting for South Africa A in two matches against India A in Potchefstroom in August 2017. Cook made 98 and 70 in the first game, and 120 and 32 in the second. Markram outscored him only once in efforts of 74, 19, 22 and 79.

Stephen Cook, who retired with 11 Test caps, played nine first-class matches for South Africa A between August 2010 and August 2017. He captained them in four of them. What changed in the 16 years between his father turning out for ostensibly the country’s second XI near the end of a career laden with runs, and him following in those footsteps as a 27-year-old still making his way?  

“In South Africa, we’ve used the A side in different ways,” Stephen Cook told Cricbuzz. “At certain stages it’s been very much a developmental team and at other times it’s been a next-best XI. At times it’s flip-flopped between the two, and that’s probably led to people asking how good is the standard. Are those the figures and the performances we should be looking at? Are those the guys next in line?

“From a player’s point of view, being clear on what type of side is being selected is very important. Arguably, at times it has led to more frustration than anything else. I remember sitting in a South Africa A changeroom telling everyone this is the next-best XI, that we were the next cab off the rank. Lo and behold, there was an injury in the Test team not even a week later and no-one from the A team got the call-up. In that era it lost a lot of credibility as a next-best scenario, but now it plays a bigger role. Maybe that’s because of the bigger squads due to Covid, and we need to know the depth of what we’ve got. So I think our A team structures have been better in recent years.”

He felt the increased frequency with which the A teams of South Africa, India and Australia have played each other in recent years during their shared off-season was important, as was going on tour with an A side: “It’s really positive when you go and play in different conditions. The away series hold double the weight. In [August] 2010 I had three weeks in Sri Lanka. Playing in hot, sticky conditions on those turning wickets was great for my career development. We had a series in Australia [in July and August 2016], mainly to play pink-ball cricket.”

His spell in Sri Lanka came almost six years before his Test debut in January 2016, but the Australian experience paid prompt dividends: he scored 40 and 104 in a day/night Test in Adelaide in November 2016.

Relevance, Stephen Cook said, was key: “If you set up a purpose and there’s a reason behind it, then it’s fantastic. When there’s a feeling that we’re obliged to play an A side in the winter, then it can lose its lustre. That’s the danger. You need to make sure there’s something behind that cap.” Happily, there was in the South Africa-India A series, what with the start of the Test series between those teams looming in Centurion on December 26.

India’s home Tests against New Zealand coincided with the A rubber in South Africa. Consequently, the only member of the A squad who will stay on for the Tests is Hanuma Vihari. He played the last of his dozen Tests in January, and made a decent case for a recall by scoring 227 runs at 75.66 in his five innings in Bloem.

South Africa have been idle since their ill-fated ODI home series against the Netherlands, which started and ended — for Covid reasons — on November 26. Their Test team last played in June, and their most recent match in the format at home was in January, when the captain was still Quinton de Kock. Division one sides have played four rounds of matches in this season’s domestic first-class competition, but it won’t hurt Dean Elgar’s and Mark Boucher’s chances of getting their heads around what it will take to beat India that Sarel Erwee, Beuran Hendricks, Marco Jansen, George Linde, Glenton Stuurman and Prenelan Subrayen — who were all busy in Bloem — are in the Test squad.

The more cricket, the better. Even if, sometimes, it can seem pointless. Maybe that’s what A teams are all about.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Parnell comes in from Kolpak cold

No room for Rilee Rossouw, George Linde in squad to play Netherlands.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

WAYNE Parnell became the first former Kolpak player to come in from the cold on Wednesday, when South Africa named their squad to play three ODIs against the Netherlands in the coming weeks. But George Linde must be wondering what he has done wrong to be overlooked again in the wake of his surprising omission from the T20 World Cup.

Parnell, who played the last of his 111 matches for South Africa in October 2017, announced in September 2018 that he had signed a three-year Kolpak contract with Worcestershire. That precluded him from playing internationally. The Kolpak era ended when the UK left the European Union at the end of January 2020, which put players like Parnell back in the mix for South Africa — as long as they featured in the country’s domestic competitions.

This season’s provincial ODI tournament has yet to be played, but in the T20 competition Parnell captained Western Province and scored 104 runs in four innings and took five wickets at an economy rate of 8.18. In a quarter-final against the Knights he took guard with his team having sunk to 105/5 chasing 224, and hammered 80 not out off 29 balls.

The Knights won by four runs, thanks in no small part to another Kolpak returnee, Rilee Rossouw, who scored an undefeated 112 off 55. Rossouw also made another century and two 50s in five innings in that competition, in which he was the leading runscorer. But he did not crack the nod for the ODI squad.

“These selections are part of our strategy to give opportunities and reward the good work of players in our provincial system,” a CSA release quoted selection convenor Victor Mpitsang as saying.

Keshav Maharaj will captain South Africa in the absence of Temba Bavuma, who is among several rested members of the T20 World Cup squad. Also not there are Quinton de Kock, Bjorn Fortuin, Heinrich Klaasen, Aiden Markram, Wiaan Mulder, Anrich Nortjé, Kagiso Rabada and Rassie van der Dussen. Maharaj was also in charge for a drawn ODI series and a 3-0 sweep of the T20Is in Sri Lanka in September and October after Bavuma broke his thumb in the first ODI.

The T20 World Cup players who have been retained are Maharaj, Reeza Hendricks, David Miller, Lungi Ngidi, Dwaine Pretorius and Tabraiz Shamsi.

Junior Dala, Beuran Hendricks and Linde were in the side for the Lankan ODIs but have lost their places. Linde is unlucky, particularly as he could have come in for Shamsi — who would have had the chance to give the groin he tweaked at the T20 World Cup a chance to recover fully.

Zubayr Hamza and Ryan Rickelton are in an ODI squad for the first time, while there are recalls — measured on the Lankan series — for Daryn Dupavillon, Ngidi, Parnell and Khaya Zondo. Sisanda Magala, who was also selected on Wednesday, and Miller missed those Colombo matches through injury.

The series is the Netherlands’ first international series in South Africa. The first two matches will be played in Centurion on November 26 and 28, and third at the Wanderers on December 1. South Africa will eye the rubber as an opportunity to secure valuable World Cup Super League points.

South Africa squad: Keshav Maharaj (captain), Daryn Dupavillon, Zubayr Hamza, Reeza Hendricks, Sisanda Magala, Janneman Malan, David Miller, Lungi Ngidi, Dwaine Pretorius, Andile Phehlukwayo, Wayne Parnell, Ryan Rickelton, Tabraiz Shamsi, Kyle Verreynne, Lizaad Williams, Khaya Zondo.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Only one win, but it means more

“Those guys who have been feeling the hurt and the pain of being left out of the T20 World Cup squad have been getting quite a bit of love from the guys.” – Aiden Markram

Telford Vice | Cape Town

IS disappointment able to leap tall buildings, cross an ocean, traverse time zones, and hurdle a hemisphere? The first T20I at the Premadasa on Friday was a chance to probe an issue that loomed in the shadow of Thursday’s unveiling of a South Africa squad for the T20 World Cup that only its selectors could love.

Unsurprisingly, the visitors’ entire XI was drawn from the squad. How would they respond to the wails from home about the omission of Faf du Plessis and George Linde, and the odd idea that seaming allrounders were preferable to their spinning counterparts on the slow pitches of the UAE and Oman? Would the disappointment reach them and undermine their efforts? 

You could have carved those questions into Colombo’s muggy monsoon air. They remained unanswered as the South Africans found their way, thanks largely to a stand of 65 off 35 balls by Aiden Markram and David Miller, to 163/5. Only two of the first 14 overs yielded 10 or more runs. Only one of the last six did not. South Africa’s total was slightly better than average for this ground, but teams that had put up bigger scores had lost seven times in the previous 39 T20Is played there.

So there was work to be done to turn back the tide of unhappiness that had rolled biliously all the way from Africa to lap at Sri Lanka’s shores. And, to their credit, the South Africans did it by strangling the Lankans’ reply to 135/6. It’s only one win and it comes in the wake of a shambolic batting performance in the deciding ODI at the same venue on Tuesday. But the circumstances made this success more significant than most isolated victories.

Lost in the angry noise from South Africa are thoughts for feelings of Beuran Hendricks, Andile Phehlukwayo, Lizaad Williams and Sisanda Magala, who also did not crack the nod for the T20 World Cup but are cheek by jowl with those who did and will be for the rest of South Africa’s time in Sri Lanka.

“It’s never a nice thing to be on the receiving end of bad news with regards to selection for a World Cup,” Markram told an online press conference. “Those guys who have been feeling the hurt and the pain have been getting quite a bit of love from the guys, who are trying to take care of them and support them. They still appreciate the value that they have in the squad as a whole going to a World Cup.

“In our environment we’ve been brilliant at that. Squads are a lot bigger in Covid times, and taking care of players who aren’t playing but are on the tour and away from home is as important as winning games.”

Quinton de Kock, back from his break for the ODI series and no stranger to the ills of bubble life, set the mood in the field on Friday with frequent yells of “Ai-yoh!” — seemingly the exclamation of choice of Asian wicketkeepers, particularly of the Lankan variety, whenever they are near a live stump microphone and the ball is not unquestionably middled.

Keshav Maharaj embellished the positive narrative when he trapped Bhanuka Rajapaksa in front to become only the second man to take a wicket with his first ball at this level in the format while also serving as captain. The only other player to tick all those boxes is Paras Khadka, who did so in Nepal’s inaugural T20I against Hong Kong in Chattogram in the 2014 World T20.

Bjorn Fortuin answered critics of his selection for next month’s tournament by taking the new ball and with it 1/24. Only Maharaj, who claimed 1/19, was more economical on Friday. What those critics don’t get or don’t want to get is that Fortuin hasn’t been given Linde’s place in the squad. Closer to the truth is that one of those seaming allrounders — Wiaan Mulder or Dwaine Pretorius — has kept Linde out. Let’s not forget that Fortuin is brown, and thus a target for racist reaction to whatever he does and does not do.

As they did in the third ODI, South Africa deployed three spinners, who bowled 13 of the 20 overs. Unlike on Tuesday, none of the slow poisoners was Markram, still officially a part-timer with the ball. So spoilt was Maharaj for choice that Kagiso Rabada and Tabraiz Shamsi — the top-ranked bowler in the format — did not complete their overs.

Less edifying for the visitors was the fact that they put down five catches. In mitigation, not one of them was straightforward and some veered towards the impossible.

Sri Lanka will look on Friday’s game as a failure to capitalise on the pressure they put on their opponents in the first half of their innings. But Dinesh Chandimal will be quietly satisfied. Having been overlooked for series against Bangladesh, England and India this year, it seemed his white-ball career had run its course. Perish the thought. Not only did he win selection to the T20 World Cup squad, he celebrated by scoring a career-best 66 not out off 54 balls.

Maybe disappointment can’t be exported, but no boundary is secure enough to stop the spread of happiness.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Faf gone, but not forgotten

“How the fuck is Linde not selected for the World Cup?” – Dane Piedt

Telford Vice | Cape Town

SOUTH Africa will soon go where they haven’t in more than 11 years: to a major tournament without Faf du Plessis. His omission from the T20 World Cup squad announced on Thursday was written between the lines of his absence from recent international series, but to not see his name on a list that it anchored for so long was jolting nonetheless.

Or was it? Du Plessis has been a fading presence in the wake of the 2019 World Cup — he has featured in only 17 of South Africa’s 54 matches since the tournament. He last played for them in February.

Instead of visiting the Caribbean, Ireland and Sri Lanka with the national side in a series of tours that started in June, he opted to play in the PSL, The Hundred and the CPL. The lingering effects of a concussion he sustained in the first of those competitions kept him out of the second, but he is back in action in the third. Perhaps, if he had kept his hand in with South Africa he would have saved himself a headache and made it to another international tournament, which had been his stated intention.

Not that things would have been that simple. South African cricket’s financial fragility makes the lure of leagues irrisistable to many of the country’s top players. Some, like AB de Villiers, end their international careers to maximise their earning potential. Others, like Du Plessis, try to keep both balls in the air in a juggling act with CSA. It seems one has come to earth with a bump in this case. 

“When you’re working with free agents you have to come together and find the balance that works for the team and the free agents,” Graeme Smith, CSA’s director of cricket, told an online press conference. “They’re attracted to a lot of leagues and the finances of those leagues, and the squad has their own requirements for how they build towards a World Cup. With Faf in particular we struggled to find that balance to make it work for both parties.”

And so South Africa will go to the T20 World Cup in the UAE and Oman in October and November without Du Plessis, who has played in every World Cup, World T20 and Champions Trophy since 2011 — eight editions of those tournaments in all.

His first World Cup was Smith’s last. Less than three years later Mark Boucher, Jacques Kallis and Smith himself had pulled the plug — or had the plug pulled — on their careers. JP Duminy, Hashim Amla and Dale Steyn are among those who have since followed.

“It’s tough and disappointing to see players retire, especially ones that have been a part of our set-up for many years,” Smith said. “But you’ve got to weigh things up and give the team the best opportunity now. They’ve been on their journey building new leaders within the squad. We’ve identified two captains [Dean Elgar and Temba Bavuma] to take the teams forward. They’ve got to build their own environments. Hopefully we’ll start to see new leaders come to the fore and build that gravitas on world stages that we can all be proud of.

“We’re very grateful for what Faf produced over the years and his stature in South African cricket. But it’s the opportunity of a new group of players to go forward and stake their claim, and for new heroes to be made.”

It’s no doubt written into Smith’s contract with CSA that his disposition has to be relentlessly sunny, regardless of reality. Rather him than many among his compatriots, who are left to wonder exactly who is going to fill the Faf-shaped hole that will gape at the heart of what used to be his team. And it really was his team. Not that we should romanticise the man — it was under Du Plessis’ captaincy that South Africa endured their worst World Cup, losing five of their eight completed games in 2019.

But when so much else about the side and about the wider game is in flux, and with South Africa’s dismissal for 125 by Sri Lanka in Colombo on Tuesday still extremely loud and incredibly close, Du Plessis’ presence would have been a balm of sorts. His teams didn’t always win, but they rarely beat themselves. That’s what good captaincy does: it makes players and supporters alike believe.

At least Du Plessis’ removal from the equation is explicable. As is Imran Tahir’s, given that Tabraiz Shamsi has morphed, deservedly, into the world’s best bowler in the format. Less so that of George Linde, who in his 19 games across the formats for South Africa has not only proved his abilities with bat and ball, but also shown himself to be as committed and dependable as Du Plessis himself. “George is one of the allrounders,” was how Victor Mpitsang, the selection convenor, justified the decision. “He has done well with the ball, but we’ve gone with seaming allrounders [in Wiaan Mulder and Dwaine Pretorius].” Seamers? For a tournament in the UAE and Oman? Two days after Keshav Maharaj, Linde, Aiden Markram and Shamsi between them bowled a South Africa record of 40 overs of spin and took 8/142 — a combined economy rate of 3.55 — in the third ODI in Colombo? Dane Piedt, once a teammate of Linde at the Cobras, asked his question less politely on Twitter: “How the fuck is GF Linde not selected to go to the World Cup?”

If seaming allrounders were the preferred option, what of Chris Morris? “Chris made himself unavailable,” Smith said. “In most of our engagements with Chris and his agent — we’ve also gone through the CEO of the Titans [Jacques Faul] — the message we’ve got back is that he’s unavailable for international cricket.”

More happily, Bavuma is on the mend after breaking his thumb in Colombo last week. “I had the operation on the weekend and I’ve already started my therapy sessions,” Bavuma said. “Recovery time, I’ve been told, is approximately four weeks. If it is four weeks, that gives me ample time to get ready for the World Cup.”

That’s something for South Africans to hold onto. Not unlike Du Plessis, Bavuma has been blessed with seriousness and calm. Panic is not something he does easily. He will need those qualities, and more, to keep his fellow South Africans — on the field with him and far away at home — from disappearing into despair when the going gets tough at the T20 World Cup. 

And get tough it will. This is not a strong South Africa squad. It is not even the best squad they could have chosen. But it is their squad. Their only squad. That, surely, is what Faf would have said.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

SA spin a titanic tale

“I don’t need to keep harping on about how good a team they are. I think everyone knows.” – Ireland captain Andrew Balbirnie on South Africa.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

WHAT does South African spin bowling have in common with the Titanic? Both sank in 1912. The wreck of the giant ship was found off the coast of Newfoundland in 1985, but spin remained submerged under fast bowling on the sharp tip of Africa. Until, perhaps, now.

Bert Vogler, Aubrey Faulkner, Reggie Schwarz and Gordon White took 50 wickets at an average of 19.06 in the 11 Tests they played together for South Africa from January 1906 to March 1910. All were wrist spinners. By August 1912, when White played his last Test at the Oval, their international careers were over.

With that any serious consideration that spin could win matches for South Africa, particularly at home, disappeared without trace. Hugh Tayfield, who took 170 wickets in 37 Tests from December 1949 to August 1960, was an exception. That likely wouldn’t have been the case had South Africa not chosen solely white Test teams until 1992.

In the 1970s and 80s Lefty Adams claimed 122 wickets at 15.47 in 27 first-class matches for the brown version of Western Province. By then the international fight against apartheid had led to South Africa’s expulsion from the international arena — which might not have happened had the then Springboks picked players of Adams’ hue. So Alan Kourie, who took 421 wickets in 127 first-class games for the white Transvaal team in much the same era as Adams, also never got a look in. Adams and Kourie were left-arm masters of flight, guile and mind games, rather than turn. Not so Denys Hobson, a leg-break and googly wizard for the white Western Province side who took 374 wickets in 175 first-class matches, also in the 1970s and 80s.

But there were exponentially more fine fast bowlers where that handful of superb slow poisoners came from, and they were central to the idea of winning cricket matches in South Africa. Eras have changed but the lineage is unbroken: since readmission the baton has been passed from Allan Donald to Makhaya Ntini to Dale Steyn to Kagiso Rabada, and many others. Krom Hendricks, Dik Abed, Ben Malamba and Vincent Barnes would have been among more who would have been given their places in the parade were it not for an establishment that refused to accept their blackness and brownness.

And here we are, 109 years after the Titanic and South African spin bowling vanished, and Temba Bavuma’s squad for their ODI series in Ireland includes four frontline slow bowlers: Tabraiz Shamsi, Keshav Maharaj, George Linde and Bjorn Fortuin. That’s still fewer than the number of quicks in the ranks, but only by one if we don’t count the seaming allrounders, which we shouldn’t do.

Maybe it’s not what it looks like. In these Covid times, squads are bigger — South Africa’s numbers 20 — and the visitors have come directly from the slow surfaces of the Caribbean. And they may be unsure of Irish conditions having last played there in July 2007. But it’s surely worth wondering whether South African attitudes towards the value of spin have changed.

Shamsi said in an audio file released on Friday that conditions for the three-match series in Malahide, which starts on Sunday, might make the question moot for now: “It definitely has a lot more in it for the fast bowlers compared to the Caribbean. We had a good training session [on Thursday], and the boys spoke about the good seam movement the pitch is offering.”

Consequently, Shamsi, who went to West Indies as the top ranked spinner in T20Is and lived up to that billing by taking seven wickets at an average of 11.42 and an economy rate of 4.00 in the five games, expected to shoulder different responsibilities against Ireland: “My role might be more minimal than it was in the West Indies. But I’m comfortable with that. I’ve realised there’s two ways of winning matches for the team. It’s not just about ‘Shammo’ taking wickets all the time. I have to adjust my game — maybe try and hold the game.”

Did the Irish think South Africa and spin were on better terms, or was their slew of slow bowlers a matter of circumstance? “They’ve got quite a big squad and they’ve just come from the Caribbean, where historically it’s been quite spin friendly,” Andrew Balbirnie, the home side’s captain, told an online press conference on Friday. “But they have plenty of options. They’ve got a really impressive squad and they’re just on the back of a two-series [Test and T20I] win in the Caribbean, so they’re full of confidence and they’ve got an abundance of bowlers to pick from. I don’t think they’ve played in Malahide before and they haven’t been to Ireland since 2007, so there may be a bit of uncertainty about what they’re going to get.”

Would coming from West Indian pitches be a help or a hindrance for the South Africans? “It can work both ways,” Balbirnie said. “They’ve had a long time there, and they’ve found form. They’ll be confident no matter what conditions you put in front of them. They’re a team who play all around the world quite regularly, so they adapt pretty well and pretty quickly.”

Did he fancy a bit of Shamsi? “He’s a good bowler, but they’re all good bowlers. I don’t need to keep harping on about how good a team they are. I think everyone knows.”

Just like everyone knows when the Titanic sank, and that its last port of call was in Ireland: at what was then Queenstown and is now Cobh, on the south coast of County Cork. Like Shamsi said, there’s more than one way to spin … a tale, as well as a ball.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Compendium of chaos levels series 

SA stumble in all departments.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

ON the 283rd day of his 42nd year, wearing a cap that hid his thinning hair but did nothing to disguise his greying dreads and beard, Chris Gayle lurched into a cartwheel. All creaky elbows, wobbly knees and saggy hamstrings, he oozed through the air awkwardly before landing with the grace of a piano being dumped onto a pavement from four floors up. Babies surely would have blushed.

With his first ball of the match, the seventh of the game, old man Gayle had had Reeza Hendricks — 10 years his junior — stumped. By a smidgen, but stumped nonetheless. The fourth T20I in Grenada on Thursday was that kind of crazy: a compendium of chaos that rarely approached what the fuddy duddies would consider a respectable game of cricket, and which West Indies won by 21 runs to level the series with a match to play.

Aiden Markram, fresh from bleeding 24 runs in two overs on Tuesday, when he shared the new ball, took the new ball this time — and sailed for 20 runs; the most West Indies have yet scored in the first over of a T20I. The home side rifled 57 runs at the cost of two wickets off the powerplay, then shambled to 14/2 in the next five overs — which were bowled by George Linde and Tabraiz Shamsi, who took 4/29 combined.

But Kieron Pollard, who had looked like an imposter, much less a captain, in scoring two runs in the first three matches of the series, rerailed the innings by hitting an unbeaten 51 off 25 balls to help his team reach 167/6 and thereby match the highest total of the rubber.

Anrich Nortjé, Lungi Ngidi and Kagiso Rabada leaked 66 runs off the last four overs. Weirder still, David Miller dropped two catches in the deep. But you know you’re really living in interesting times when it’s up to an anarchist of the crease like Quinton de Kock to restore a semblance of order. At 110/6 in the 16th over why wouldn’t you hammer the next delivery over long-on for six to reach 50 off 37 balls, as De Kock did?

But, when he spooned a full toss off Dwayne Bravo to point with 18 balls left in the game and 42 runs needed, the sting was drawn from the contest. De Kock’s 43-ball 60 was as good as anything any batter has banked in this series. It wasn’t good enough on Thursday. No-one else in South Africa’s line-up made more than Markram’s 20, and with Bravo ripping through the lower order to take a career-best 4/19 there was no stopping the Windies.

Only in the first match of the series, which West Indies won by eight wickets with five overs to spare, have they lived up to their deserved status as favourites. But here we are, level at 2-2 and heading into a decider on Saturday. 

Before Thursday, South Africa had won two tight games batting first. Had fielding first this time made a difference? “We conceded 20 runs in our first over; that’s going to put you under pressure whether you’re bowling first or second,” Temba Bavuma told an online press conference. “And when you finish off your bowling innings like that it doesn’t matter when you’re bowling, and our batters didn’t pitch up.”

Murphy’s law, in other words. But beware Finagle’s corollary to Murphy’s law: “Anything that can go wrong, will — at the worst possible moment.” The fifth T20I on Saturday might be that moment.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Same but different as SA level series

“The guys knew they would have to be brave.” – Temba Bavuma 

Telford Vice | Cape Town

IF a definition of insanity is to ask the same question and expect a different answer, South Africa went mad in Grenada on Sunday. What did they think they were doing, having been smashed by eight wickets with five overs to spare in the first T20I on Saturday — not only at the same ground but on the same pitch — sending an unchanged XI into the fray?

It seemed an odd decision that yielded an inexplicable result: South Africa won by 16 runs. How could it be that none of the players who sat out on Saturday merited inclusion on Sunday, despite the first-choice side having been outplayed in all departments? How could it be that the same combination that had crashed and burned 24 hours earlier performed demonstrably better, against the same set of opponents in identical conditions, a day later?

Please explain, Reeza Hendricks. “We had good chats on how to come up with better plans, and I think the bowlers executed very well,” Hendricks told an online press conference. Did the conditions change much? “The ball was stopping with the spinners and turning quite a bit.” In his television interview, Temba Bavuma offered a big picture view: “The guys knew they would have to be brave.” 

Closer to the truth, of course, is that no-one can say why Sunday’s game was so different from Saturday’s. Welcome, pilgrim, to what remains the least predictable format. Once captains, coaches and — most importantly — analysts figure out how to ensure T20 success, the mystery and intrigue and sheer fun will disappear and we’ll have to endure the dullness that pervades most of the other flavour of white-ball cricket. Those who despise the T20 version do so chiefly because, as yet, it doesn’t follow the script they know by heart. And so they look silly when their prognostication is shown up for the piffle it is.

A special place in purgatory surely is reserved for the miseries who refuse to enjoy a game of cricket for what it is and not what they say it should be. Sunday’s match was exactly that: a thing to marvel at, regardless of which team you supported or which narrative you said would prevail.

South Africa’s top three of Hendricks, Quinton de Kock and Bavuma scored almost 70% of their total in an innings in which only Tabraiz Shamsi and Lungi Ngidi did not bat. Kevin Sinclair was the lone West Indian bowler to keep the damage to under a run a ball, but Obed McCoy did more than his bit by dismissing David Miller, Heinrich Klaasen and George Linde to claim a career-best 3/25.

South Africa’s 166/7 — just six more then they mustered on Saturday — didn’t look nearly enough. And when West Indies reached 53/2 in their powerplay it seemed the contest was dead in the water. But in the next six overs only 23 runs were scored and three wickets fell. All of those overs were bowled by Linde and Shamsi.

Kieron Pollard’s arrival in a sun hat and what looked like an expensive gold watch must have made his departure after facing four balls — via a slog-sweep off Shamsi that Hendricks swooped on to catch low near the midwicket fence — more than a little embarrassing for the men in maroon. Klaasen was in the same fielding position four balls after that to pluck a complicated catch out of the sun, then the shade, to earn André Russell’s wicket for Linde.

The Windies needed 36 off the last over to win, and when Fabian Allen launched two big blows off Ngidi’s first couple of deliveries it seemed a miracle might be in the offing. But, not before time, we were all out of madness. That is, until the series resumes on Tuesday.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Lemonade, losses and lies: behind the Boucher brouhaha

“If I had to worry about public opinion I probably would have hanged myself a long time ago.” – Mark Boucher

Telford Vice | Cape Town

THERE’S a reason the breadless sandwich never caught on. And the perforated umbrella. Same applies to the square-wheeled bicycle. Similarly, the team South Africa were able to field against Pakistan is in the league of ideas whose time have yet to come.

As if sacrificing five key players to the Indian Premier League (IPL) after two of the seven matches wasn’t handicapping enough, they lost their captain to injury for the last four games and their most in form batter for two of them.

You can measure your depth in such circumstances but you cannot expect victory. So played seven, won two is a fair and predictable reflection against a side bristling with threats like Babar Azam, Fakhar Zaman, Mohammad Rizwan, Hasan Ali and Shaheen Shah Afridi. Take those players out of Pakistan’s XI and see how they fare.

Even so, it’s Mark Boucher’s job to make lemonade from the lemons he has been given. And they aren’t bad lemons. Aiden Markram reeled off a hattrick of half-centuries in the T20Is, where Lizaad Williams took seven wickets and added plenty of zest, and George Linde burnished his allrounder credentials. But the lemonade they made, now that’s another matter.

“Although we lost as a team there were some fantastic individual performances we can be very proud of,” Boucher told an online press conference on Friday after Pakistan clinched a T20I series in South Africa for the first time. “We can see the next group of players are a little bit rough around the edges. They perform well in certain pockets of the game. But in international cricket you’ve got to have more of an allround, polished game in order to win.

“We’ve lost a couple of series. There’s been reasons for that. I’m not going to make any excuses. We’ve still got to try and win with whatever side we put out on the park. It has been quite tough but there’s a lot of positives. I’ve got a fair idea of the enlarged squad we can look at. I’m pretty sure every player in that squad will be able to match international standards.”

All well and good, but this goes deeper than that. South Africa were in trouble long before Quinton de Kock, David Miller, Kagiso Rabada, Lungi Ngidi and Anrich Nortjé left for the IPL, and before Temba Bavuma and Rassie van der Dussen were injured.

There’s a narrative seeping through South African cricket that this is chiefly Boucher’s fault. Since he was appointed coach in December 2019 his team have lost eight of 11 series across the formats. That is an unimpeachable fact, but the bigger truth is that South Africa have been on the skids since the 2019 World Cup. Including that tournament, they have won only 16 of their last 45 completed matches. Or two of 14 series, if we include the World Cup.

And who has been the coach who has presided over those victories, South Africa’s sole successes in almost two years? Boucher. You won’t hear that, or any objective view of the performance of Ottis Gibson and Enoch Nkwe, the coaches who came before him, in the deluge of dishonesty that is being poured, disingenuously, over Boucher’s head. That wouldn’t fit the conspiracy theory that he was appointed solely because Graeme Smith is his big mate, and is being exposed as unfit for the job. Indeed, Boucher is the worst thing to happen to South African cricket since forever. It might be worth asking these people who really killed JFK, or who stands to gain the most from vaccinating the global population against Covid-19. Then again, maybe not. They would shout only one answer: “Boucher!” 

The flags were flying at half-mast from these faulty ivory towers again on Friday, when Boucher’s press conference — publication of which was originally embargoed to 9.30am (IST) on Saturday — was pushed back to 8.30pm (IST). This was done at the request of reporters writing for Sunday newspapers, who hoped to have something fresher for their publications than comments that would be stale by the time their papers hit the streets. But no sooner had the embargo been changed than the reason for that happening was fictionalised on social media as some sort of official attempt to shield Boucher from criticism. The post was taken down, though without apology or explanation. And an untruth made it halfway around the world before the truth got its pants on.     

The hate — and it is nothing short of hate — directed Boucher’s way is entwined with South Africa’s poisoned race politics. He is white, as is Smith. Most of the criticism coming their way emanates from black and brown quarters. South Africa have been poor in all three disciplines against Pakistan, but it seems only Boucher is to blame. Charl Langeveldt and Justin Ontong, the bowling and fielding coaches, have somehow escaped having their abilities questioned. Both are brown.

Other South Africans regards themselves, wholly erroneously, as the start and end of the game’s authentic establishment. They do so in much the same way as the MCC used to think it owned cricket. They are, in their own lunchtimes, gatekeepers pushing back against barbarian tendencies. They look straight past the losses South Africa have racked up under Boucher — maybe because it’s difficult to see straight when you’re rolling your eyes at the noisy infidels — and will not abide any questioning of Smith’s suitability as director of cricket. They are white.

Boucher is caught in this colour coded crossfire. “If I had to worry about public opinion I probably would have hanged myself a long time ago,” he said. “The pressure is going to be there no matter what. When you get to this level you must expect that. If you can’t handle it maybe you get out of the kitchen.”

So it serves him well that he is two steps ahead of both his haters and his hero worshippers: no-one is harder on Boucher than Boucher. “I take a massive amount of responsibility, and I should,” he said. “I don’t shy away from it. I’m extremely hurt at the moment, as is the rest of my management and coaching staff. We’ve put in a lot of hard work. But there’s no panic for me yet. I do understand we have been given some trying circumstances, and we will continue to put in the hard work. I’ll go back home now. I’ll sit around with my family for a while. After a week or so I’ll get back into it and be training with the guys and try to get them better.”

Boucher should use some of his break to find a better answer to why Kyle Verreynne isn’t getting more gametime despite the batting unit’s struggles. Verreynne was part of both the ODI and T20I squads but he played in only one ODI, and scored 62. In his two innings before that, for the Cobras in first-class matches, he made 216 not out and 109. To explain his omission with “he was selected as a back-up wicketkeeper”, as Boucher has done, is not good enough. It’s also unacceptable that the absence from the attack of Andile Phehlukwayo, who played in all four T20Is but bowled only four overs, is ascribed to a lack of confidence. How does it help his confidence that he is on the field but not bowling? Questions like these need to be asked and answered honestly, not through prisms of prejudice.     

South Africa will gather again on May 28 for a three-day camp before they depart for the Caribbean to play two Tests and five T20s. Dates have yet to be confirmed, but by then the IPL will be out of the way and all existing injuries should be resolved. “We always earmarked this West Indian trip as when our full squad needs to be together and when we start learning how to play with each other, and learning different aspects of each others’ games.”

They should teach each other to juggle. That’s something else you can do when life gives you lemons.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.