Du Preez presides, for now, after Moreeng marathon finally ends

“Whatever you know about cricket, the moment you move into the women’s space you find out that you might know nothing.” – Dillon du Preez, South Africa interim coach

Telford Vice / Cape Town

HILTON Moreeng’s marathon of more than 11 years as South Africa’s women’s team’s coach is over. But who his permanent replacement might be remains as uncertain as it has been for the almost 15 months that CSA have searched for his successor.

Moreeng has been in the job since December 2012. His last match in charge was to have been the T20 World Cup final between South Africa and Australia at Newlands in February last year. But CSA’s failure to settle on a suitable successor meant he was retained on a series of interim contracts.

On Friday, CSA said Moreeng had decided to relinquish the position. Dillon du Preez, who was appointed assistant coach in September 2020, will step in until the end of the tour to India in June.

Last year’s final is the only World Cup decider any senior South Africa team, female or male, have reached. Moreeng took his team to four other semifinals in both formats. Under him South Africa won 84 of 149 ODIs and 60 of 127 T20Is, an overall success rate of 52.17%.

Moreeng was the first fulltime coach for South Africa’s women’s team. He was appointed almost a year before CSA first decided to contract women, and he was more or less a one-person support staff. Nearly eight years later, when Du Preez came on board, the team had a manager, a strength and conditioning coach, a doctor and a physiotherapist. Now they also have specialist batting and fielding coaches, with Du Preez taking care of the bowling. Moreeng has been an important figure in the successful metamorphosis of women’s cricket in South Africa from an amateur pursuit to fully-fledged professionalism.

“Whatever you know about cricket, the moment you move into the women’s space you find out that you might know nothing,” Du Preez told a press conference on Friday. “What Hilton has done for me has been amazing. I couldn’t have picked a better guy to learn from.”

But Moreeng’s team have outgrown him. In August, not quite six months after the T20 World Cup final, it emerged senior players had written to CSA to express their dissatisfaction with his methods, which they considered outdated. That was thought to be the reason for Suné Luus resigning the captaincy and for Chloe Tryon leaving the squad. The unhappiness has been reflected in the results — since the T20 World Cup, South Africa have won 12 games and lost 15. 

The players’ problems with Moreeng weren’t personal. Instead, they felt he had run out of the kind of ideas they were exposed to in foreign franchise leagues. Given that delicate situation, had CSA consulted with the players to see if they were happy with Du Preez?

“We did acknowledge what transpired in the environment a few months ago,” Enoch Nkwe, CSA’s director of cricket, said. “We had a couple of meetings with everyone included, the management and the players, to figure out the real issues and what can be done in the short term. And also what can be worked on from a long-term point of view to try and better the environment and strengthen it.” Du Preez was more direct: “I’ve got the commitment from the management and the players.”

Considering Du Preez had been Moreeng’s assistant for almost four years, and seeing as his charges approved of him, had he been offered the position permanently? “Those are going to be the conversations that are going to be taking place,” Nkwe said. “We didn’t want to dump everything immediately. We also need him to understand if he would like to do this moving forward. There are also internal processes that need to be understood and respected. It was probably better to go the interim route while we’re trying to sort out a lot of those things internally. And to allow Dillon the space to think through things in the medium to long term. Maybe he puts his hand up and it’s a role that he’d like to take forward. Who knows. We’ll have to wait and see.”

Did Du Preez want the job permanently? “I think I will want it,” he said. “It’s too early to give you a 100% answer. But that’s where you want to be, at the highest level. I would really want to coach there; I enjoy it a lot. But let’s talk after India.”

Nkwe said in November that interviews for the position had been conducted and that Moreeng’s successor was due to be named before the tour to Australia in January and February this year. That did not happen, and Moreeng stayed on. “Unfortunately we couldn’t find fitting candidates to take the team forward,” Nkwe said on Friday. He added that Moreeng had agreed in January to “help us with the transition post the 50-over World Cup next year”. But said he changed his mind last month after Sri Lanka earned their first ever series win in South Africa, prevailing 2-1 in the T20Is, and drew the ODI rubber. “Unfortunately he came to the end of the season and felt he didn’t have it anymore to continue,” Nkwe said.

What now for Moreeng, who at 46 is far from at the end of the coaching road? “We would like to retain him in whichever way because you don’t just let go of such experience, especially in women’s cricket,” Nkwe said.

If Du Preez’ name sounds familiar to those who don’t remember him as a flashy bowling allrounder on South Africa’s domestic scene, it might be because he once had Sachin Tendulkar and Ajinkya Rahane caught in the slips with consecutive deliveries. He was playing for Royal Challengers Bangalore against Mumbai Indians in a 2009 IPL game at the Wanderers, and came within a centimetre or two of a hattrick — his next delivery hit JP Duminy’s pads too high. When Du Preez had Duminy caught behind with the second ball of his next over, he had taken three wickets for no runs.

Fifteen years and exactly one week later, Du Preez isn’t hitting the headlines that hard anymore. But, as Nkwe said, “who knows” whether he will again.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Kallis talks himself into transformation tangle

“I wasn’t allowed to be involved in the South African side because CSA said there would be no more white consultants.” – Jacques Kallis

Telford Vice | Cape Town

JACQUES Kallis has taken what will be seen as an anti-transformation stance on the realities of the game in South Africa. Some will go further and damn his opinions as the arrogant views of the privileged. Others will hold up his words as more evidence that CSA is too good at driving the best away from the game in this country.

Kallis was appointed South Africa’s batting consultant for the rest of the 2019/20 season shortly after Graeme Smith, his former teammate and captain, became CSA’s director of cricket in December 2019. Last month the ECB said Kallis had agreed to serve as England’s batting consultant for their Test series in Sri Lanka, which starts on Thursday.

“I wasn’t allowed to be involved in the South African side because CSA said there would be no more white consultants,” Kallis told an online press conference with England-based reporters on Wednesday. “So unfortunately [the position with South Africa] fell away and this opportunity of helping England out came about. I took it with both hands. I haven’t been able to be involved with the South African guys over the last couple of months since I was involved with them during the England series [in South Africa in 2019/20].” Were his services requested by South Africa’s players? “There were a few but unfortunately there was a rule that was put in, and it was taken out of our hands.”

How did that make Kallis feel? “I suppose it’s the way of our country. A lot of players have had to fall away because of needing players of colour involved. We all understand that’s the country that we live in. It is tough but we understand where it comes from. It is sad but it’s the times that we’re living in at the moment.

“Unfortunately we’ve lost a few players for whatever reasons overseas. There are many other coaches who have gone on to coach other teams. Gary Kirsten [who won the 2011 World Cup with India] is an example. There’s lots of guys. It’s kind of the modern way of the world. It’s sad in a way that I can’t help out in South Africa, but I’ve thoroughly enjoyed my time [with England].”

Kallis is correct in that CSA resolved, after an August 31 meeting with sports minister Nathi Mthethwa, to appoint only black and brown consultants unless no suitable candidates were available. But he is wrong to say that decision disqualified him from working with South Africa. Proof of that is the appointment, announced on September 10, of Neil McKenzie as CSA’s batting lead. Two days earlier Dillon du Preez was unveiled as the national women’s team’s assistant coach. McKenzie and Du Preez are, like Kallis, white. They are also employees and not consultants, but nothing would have stopped Kallis from landing positions like those. He should have known he would have had to put up his hand if he wanted a job because his contract as South Africa’s batting consultant expired in March.

On January 3 CSA’s interim board — which replaced the elected structure on November 17 — said: “The entire [transformation targets] document adopted by the previous board has been put on hold.” That meant the conditional prohibition on employing white consultants had been suspended. Did Kallis not know this? “I haven’t heard anything like that,” he said.

Kallis was born in October 1975 — the year before the Soweto Uprising kickstarted a liberation struggle in South Africa that had to be fought for another 18 years, claiming many lives, before apartheid was defeated at the ballot box in April 1994. By then Kallis had played for South Africa’s under-17 team and the South African Schools XI and won three first-class caps. The country’s democratic experiment was a year old when he featured in South Africa’s under-24 and A sides. That December, against England at Kingsmead, he played the first of his 166 Tests.

There can be no argument that Kallis is among the finest players cricket has yet seen. It is just as unarguable that his path to the top would have been exponentially more difficult had he been born anything other than white in the brutally unequal South Africa of his day. That he would have had access to cricket at all had he been black or brown is manifestly uncertain.

Millions of his compatriots did not enjoy the privileges he was born into by dint of nothing else but his whiteness, and which afforded him the opportunities to work hard to make the most of his talent. How many of those South Africans were just as talented — or more — but were denied the chances Kallis was given by the establishment’s disapproval of their blackness or brownness? We cannot know. But we can be sure that millions of black, brown and white South Africans will be disappointed by his ignorance, saddened by his flaunting of it, and angered that someone who has achieved so much in the game can be so blinkered about the circumstances of his place in the bigger game of life.

First published by Cricbuzz.

CSA halt to colour coding too late to keep Kallis

“The entire [transformation targets] document adopted by the previous board has been put on hold.” – Judith February, CSA interim board member

Telford Vice | Wanderers

CSA’S interim board has rolled back an earlier commitment the organisation made to government to appoint black and brown consultants exclusively whenever possible. That emerged in the wake of Jacques Kallis, who is white, being signed as England’s batting specialist after working with South Africa in that capacity last season.

“The entire [transformation targets] document adopted by the previous board has been put on hold,” interim board member Judith February told reporters on Sunday. “We are taking legal advice [regarding] the document and whatever obligations CSA had in terms of it.”

On August 1, CSA director of cricket Graeme Smith said: “If you’re asking me whether Jacques Kallis was one of the best batting coaches and batting cricketers we’ve ever had, I’d tell you yes. Do I feel he has a role to play in South African cricket? Jeez, it would be stupid of us not to involve our most successful cricketer, and the batting experiences he could bring to our young batters.” But, on August 31, CSA told Nathi Mthethwa, South Africa’s sports minister, that it would in future employ only black and brown consultants unless none suitable could be found.

Nevertheless, on September 10 CSA named Neil McKenzie as its high performance batting lead and Dillon du Preez as assistant coach of the women’s team. Both are white and, just as importantly, permanently appointed. So they are not consultants.

That might have reassured figures like Kallis that his skills were still valued by CSA. But the ECB revealed his acquisition for England’s imminent Test series in Sri Lanka on December 21. 

Mthethwa had also been told that transformation targets for South Africa’s team would be hiked from the current proviso of at least two black and four brown players in every XI to seven black and brown players by 2022/23, at least three of them black. The interim board said on December 3 that plan had been put on hold.

The entire board that made the decisions about consultants and transformation targets — and presided over a range of governance and financial calamities — resigned on October 25 and 26. Under Mthethwa’s guidance an interim board, headed by former constitutional court judge Zak Yacoob, was appointed on November 17.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

White or not, McKenzie back on board at CSA

“It’s an exciting coaching group I’m going to be part of – looking after the under-19s all the way through to the Proteas.” – Neil McKenzie, CSA’s new batting guru

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

WILL the real CSA please stand up? Last week they gave South Africa’s government a commitment that they would appoint only black and brown consultants unless none were available. This week they appointed two whites in prominent positions.

Dillon du Preez was named as assistant coach of South Africa’s women’s team on Tuesday. On Thursday, Neil McKenzie was unveiled as the “high performance batting lead”. The devil, of course, is in the details: neither has signed on as a consultant. They are permanent staff.

But that will do little to placate those who have charged the cricket establishment with systemic racism going back decades. Not least Nathi Mthethwa, the minister of sport, who has complained that the upper echelons of the game are too white. Do CSA intend to get around the promise they made to him, at a meeting last Monday, about the colour of their consultants by simply not describing their appointees as consultants?      

In the super-heated atmosphere cricket has stumbled into, that Du Preez and McKenzie are solidly qualified for their new roles and, particularly in McKenzie’s case, have the track records to prove their competence matters less than the fact that they are neither black nor brown. And thus it also matters whether their jobs could have been given to those of similar stature and abilities who are black or brown. Geoff Toyana, for instance. Or Ashwell Prince.

Two blacks and four brown people were also appointed on Thursday. Eddie Khoza, whose excellence as an administrator has helped him rise above the febrile polarisation in the game, continues as CSA’s “acting head of cricket pathways”. Malibongwe Maketa returns from the exile he seemed to be cast into after last year’s disastrous World Cup, where he was Ottis Gibson’s assistant, as “South Africa A and national academy lead”. Shukri Conrad, a veteran of the coaching circuit, is the “South Africa under-19 men’s lead”. The respected and experienced Vincent Barnes, a former South Africa bowling and assistant coach, is the “high performance manager and bowling lead”. Dinesha Devnarain, who played 51 white-ball internationals, carries on as the South Africa under-19 women’s team and women’s national academy head coach. CSA’s chief medical officer will still be Shuaib Manjra, who doesn’t seem to have put a foot wrong.

But it’s McKenzie’s name that sticks out. He was named South Africa’s batting coach in February 2016 and replaced by Dale Benkenstein in October 2017, when Gibson succeeded Russell Domingo. It’s difficult to judge coaches, especially those who work in the technical disciplines. But it’s a fact that South Africa’s batters averaged 37.54, regardless of format, under McKenzie. Since he has left they have averaged 28.96.

South Africans’ most recent memory of him will be in a World Cup match at the Oval on June 2 last year, when he helped engineer Bangladesh’s victory over his compatriots. The 330/6 McKenzie’s charges scored was then their record ODI total and they topped 300 twice more during the tournament.

“I’ve come back a little more rounded as a coach,” McKenzie said in an audio file released by CSA on Thursday of his stint of more than two years in Bangladesh’s dugout. “It was a good experience but it’s really nice to be back with South Africa and trying to make a really good contribution.”

What were the parameters of his role? “It’s an exciting coaching group I’m going to be part of — looking after the under-19s all the way through to the Proteas,” McKenzie said. “I’ll be generally looking after the batting. It’s a young batting unit when you look across all the formats and spheres in the men’s and women’s [teams].”

In effect, then, McKenzie will serve as South Africa’s batting coach. Or consultant. Or “lead”, whatever that means. That would also seem to indicate there is no vacancy for a dedicated batting coach or consultant for the national team.

McKenzie was a good bet to return to South Africa’s dressingroom since he said on August 21 that he had resigned as Bangladesh’s batting coach. The current politics of cricket in South Africa threatened to throw a spanner in the works, but CSA have found a way to secure his services.

Graeme Smith, CSA’s director of cricket, will doubtless come under fire for what some will refuse to see as nothing other than another instance of him handing out jobs for pals: he played in 50 of McKenzie’s 124 matches for South Africa and captained him 38 times. Smith has faced the same claim over his appointment of Mark Boucher as head coach and Jacques Kallis, who served as the batting consultant last season. Smith played 258 international matches with Boucher and 261 with Kallis.

Perhaps Smith saw the accusation coming. In a video file of more than six minutes he extolled the virtues of Maketa, Conrad and Khoza, and even a position that has yet to be filled — that of convenor of selectors — but did not mention McKenzie.

“The convenor of selectors is a key person in CSA,” Smith said. “It’s a job that comes with a lot of pressure from all fronts. We went about advertising the job. Our HR department collects all the applications and we move from there into interview processes. With the cricket committee and the board members [involved] we decide on the best candidate going forward.

“The role definition is slightly changed. We’ve shifted it to not only being a national team convenor, but to controlling the whole pipeline, which speaks to our high performance strategy. We feel it’s important to create the avenues of communication — the way we play, select, think, operate, the type of people we want involved in that environment is key. We’ve aligned the convenor of selectors right through the pipeline. He’ll be overseeing everything. The convenor now is a much more extensive job.

“One thing I noticed when I got involved with CSA in December is that there were decent people involved but there wasn’t really that cross-communication. What was happening at under-19 level was separate to what was happening at the national academy, was separate to what was happening with the A team and then the national side. The thinking was not going right through the pipeline. The convenor of selectors working on the whole system and owning the whole system, and being part of all the processes, is key.

“That strategy is now in place, and we will sit down as a group and debate and work on our way forward, and try and align as closely to the national teams as we can in terms of culture, performance and what’s needed to hopefully push us to a level where our national teams are the best in the world. That they’re winning World Cups, that we’re bringing talent through, [that] we’re transforming at a level that is acceptable to everybody. Those are the goals with these appointments; that we can become really efficient and that cricket can push forward and create the strength that is required of us.”  

Listening to Smith, you could fool yourself that CSA is a functional organisation bound for great things. But then you remember why someone as highly regarded, deservedly, as Khoza is marooned in an acting capacity. His permanent position is senior cricket manager, which is being filled temporarily by David Mokopanele, in real life CSA’s mass participation manager. Khoza has been bumped up because Corrie van Zyl, previously the head of cricket pathways, has returned as an executive consultant in the wake of winning his case after being suspended in October, along with former chief operating officer Naasei Appiah and former sponsorship and sales head Clive Eksteen. Former chief executive Thabang Moroe was central to the drama. Appiah, Eksteen and Moroe have all since been fired. And all are taking legal action.

Can there be any surprise that many South Africans want to get as far way from cricket as they can? Even South Africans like Jonty Rhodes, who has been confirmed as Sweden’s new head coach. Yes, Sweden.

“The sad thing for me is that even though the top 30 players in the country want to work together for the game, the administration is in such chaos that unfortunately it does have an impact on things [on the field],” Rhodes was quoted as saying on Wednesday in a PTI report from Dubai, where he is Kings XI Punjab’s fielding coach for the IPL starting on September 19.

“Someone like me who is not part of the system, we are reading about issues in South African cricket week in and week out and they have not been resolved. The same mistakes are being made and there is not much accountability. It saddens me … it does impact on-field performance. Even though we have some great players, we have been lacking consistency in performance because of inconsistency off the field.” 

That’s the real CSA. Right there. It will have to work harder than ever to stand up.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Dillon du Preez: the IPL’s afterthought allrounder

He had to prepone his wedding. He was sledged by Shane Warne. He came close to a bomb blast. He would do it all again.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

YOU’VE sat in the dugout in three different cities watching your teammates play the first seven matches of the tournament. You’re finally given a game. You bowl eight balls without anyone taking a run off you. By then you’ve claimed three wickets. Not just any wickets: Sachin Tendulkar, Ajyinka Rahane — with consecutive deliveries — and JP Duminy.

But you play only one more match in the competition. When it’s all over you have bowled seven overs of a possible 64 — more than eight times fewer than the hardest working member of your team’s attack — and faced 13 balls, or less than 4% of the number received by the busiest batter in your dressingroom.

You have a right to feel hard done by, denied the chance you have earned to give of your best. You are Dillon du Preez.

“To be honest, I was happy I got the two games,” Du Preez told Cricbuzz about playing for Royal Challengers Bangalore in the 2009 IPL. That he was on the books at all was, he said, a case of the franchise big wigs thinking “we’ve got some leftover cash, let’s sign another allrounder”.

The other side of that equation was more complicated. Du Preez explained: “I got the call from [RCB coach] Ray Jennings to say, ‘Do you want to be part of the IPL?’. I said, ‘Don’t ask me ridiculous questions — I’m there.’ He said, ‘OK. You need to be in India on the 10th of April.’ I said, ‘Can I be there on the 11th? I’m getting married on the 10th …’.

“[Jennings] words were, ‘There are a lot of nice places in India where you can get married.’. We actually moved the wedding to the 20th of March. Only to find out about a week after that that the IPL would start on the 18th of April and that it was being moved to South Africa! My wife’s still pissed off with me.”

That wasn’t the only bit of unsmooth sailing for Du Preez. RCB lost four of their first seven games, prompting a rethink for their match at the Wanderers against Mumbai Indians, who had won four of six. “Jennings came to me the night before and said, ‘Listen, you’re playing tomorrow’,” Du Preez said. “I actually couldn’t sleep — I had been told I was a back-up player for guys like [Jacques] Kallis or [Dale] Steyn. I was getting into the changeroom the next day when I remembered that I had left my playing shirts at the hotel. I had to send the security guard back to my room to get my clothing. So it was a great start.”

All was forgotten when, with his third ball, he drew Tendulkar into an untidy drive with a fullish delivery outside off. The healthy edge flew to Rahul Dravid at slip. “I remember running through to the guys and celebrating, and on my way back to my mark I thought, ‘What just happened?’. I mean, that guy invented cricket! I couldn’t believe it.”

Du Preez’ early success sparked a second slip, Robin Uthappa. Who’s idea was that? “I was floating in the clouds. I’ve no idea. I want to take credit for it, but I really don’t know.” Whoever was responsible, it proved an inspired decision. Du Preez’ next delivery was identical to his previous ball, Ajyinka played a stroke similar to Tendulkar’s, and Uthappa took the catch.

Enter Duminy to face the hattrick attempt, which was pitched shorter. The left-hander shouldered arms and was struck high on the front leg. Nonetheless, RCB yowled like a choir of scolded cats. “It wasn’t out,” Du Preez said. “I went up for the lbw shout — on a hattrick ball you have to — but it was never out.” Duminy became Du Preez’ third victim in his next over, when he flailed at a short, wide effort and was taken behind by Mark Boucher.

In the same over Du Preez found a defending Dwayne Bravo’s edge. But the ball dribbled to earth. He clanged Sanath Jayasuriya on the helmet. Conceding two singles was the closest he came to getting anything wrong.

So he was granted another over. Anil Kumble’s misfield to Jayasuriya’s extra cover drive off the first ball cost three runs. Two dots and a single to Bravo followed. The afterthought allrounder was looking good: 2.4-1-7-3. Then Jayasuriya produced an unlovely but emphatic horizontal swipe to smear a short ball over mid-on for four. Du Preez, his tail up and trusting the fastest pitch in the country to be on his side, retaliated with another semi-bouncer — which Jayasuriya dispatched many metres over the midwicket fence. “He smacked me so hard it almost hit the scoreboard.”

Even so, Du Preez had done enough for Kumble to entrust him with the last over of the innings. But his planets had lost their alignment. Abishek Nayar blitzed a four down the ground and edged another boundary to the fine leg. Four runs off the next three balls took the over’s damage to a dozen runs. Bowl the last one and get the hell out of there … Not only did Du Preez overstep he also flubbed a simple throw for a runout, which resulted in overthrows: “Thanks for reminding me. I forgot about that.” The free hit was worth just one — Nayar’s top edge plopped in front of mid-on — but the 16 runs Du Preez conceded in that over were as many as he had given up in his first three combined.

All ended happily for RCB with Jacques Kallis and Uthappa scoring unbeaten half-centuries to seal victory by nine wickets with a ball short of two overs remaining. “I was sitting in the bus on the way back to the hotel really chuffed,” Du Preez said. “You’re playing with some big guns — Kumble, Dravid, [Virat] Kohli was still casual — so when you get a game you feel like you have to perform to prove that you’re part of this; that you fit in and are on par.”

Du Preez kept his place for RCB’s next match, against Rajasthan Royals in Centurion four days later. Before he could get his hands on the ball, he had to bat. He walked out in the 15th over with RCB having crashed to 72/6 and his coach’s barked instruction uppermost: “Don’t get out! Be there at over 18!” Sergeant-major Jennings, Du Preez said, “has a funny way of making you feel bad for not doing what he says”.

“This guy is a legend, but he’s a clown.” – Du Preez on Shane Warne.

But other words fogged the calm head Du Preez needed to succeed in his mission: “Shane Warne was standing at cover giving me a mouthful. I stood there looking at him and I wanted to have a full go in Afrikaans. I did say something — I’m not going to tell you what — but I was thinking, ‘I’m not even facing. Why are you having a go at me?’. I wanted to climb in and smack him out of Centurion. He was in my face for a few overs, and I was at the non-striker’s end thinking, ‘This guy is a legend, but he’s a clown’.”

It seems a good thing, for Du Preez, that Warne had only one over left when he took guard. He faced just two balls from the Australian, squirting a single backward of square leg and surviving a threatening slider. There were four balls left in the innings after Du Preez shoved Amit Singh’s slower ball down long-on’s throat. Gone for 10 in a measly total of 105. But at least he had followed Jennings’ orders.

The highlight of Du Preez’ three overs, no two of them bowled consecutively, was a short delivery to Yusuf Pathan, who was beaten for pace and top edged to fine leg. It had little impact on a match Rajasthan won with three wickets down and 30 balls remaining.

That confirmed RCB’s fifth loss in nine games. But they won four of their last five to finish third in the standings before sweeping past Chennai Super Kings by six wickets in their semi-final. Only to go down by six runs to Deccan Chargers in the final. Du Preez was returned to the spectators’ ranks for all seven of those matches — despite the fact that the semi and the final were played at the Wanderers, where he had performed so well. But no bitterness lingered: “Just being part of it was amazing, sitting in the changeroom with people like Anil. I was 12 or 13 when I first saw him play. When guys like that talk, you listen.”

Du Preez never bowled nor faced another ball in the IPL. But, as his contract was for two years, he was in India for the 2010 edition. “It was again nice being part of it, but after six weeks I had started moving my bed to the other side of the hotel room and putting the TV somewhere else just to get a different view of things. It was tough. My wife was pregnant, so she couldn’t fly over.”

That’s not to say he left with dull memories only: “Before a game against Mumbai in Bangalore there was a massive bang. We were told to go into the changeroom, and that it a generator had blown up. But on the TV next to the officials while they were telling us that it was reported as a bomb. Kevin Pietersen said, ‘This is not my bread and butter, so that’s it — I’m done, I’m not going onto the field’. I was 12th-man but I didn’t walk around the field. I stayed in the changeroom. Dale Steyn played a loose shot and got out, and on his way back to the changeroom — while I was looking out at the field — he smacked his bat onto the steps next to me. I thought it was another bomb!”

In fact, two bombs had exploded an hour before the scheduled start of the April 17 match, injuring 15 people and reducing to rubble a section of the wall around M. Chinnaswamy Stadium. A third was discovered and defused by police. In other countries the match would have been called off. But not in India: the start of play was delayed by an hour. According to contemporary reports, Bangalore police commissioner Shankar Bidari said, “It is a minor bomb blast, but investigations are in full swing to find out who is responsible.” Seven people connected to jihadist organisations were arrested.

You might consider the trip a mistake. But you’re not Du Preez: “Even if I had to pay for my own flight I would have gone, just to be part of it.” And for the money? “Some guys could buy a casino or a cruise ship with what they make from the IPL, but not me.” How much did he earn? “Was it USD50,000? I can’t remember.”

“I wanted to put my foot through that laptop [when he was confirmed as unsold for the 2011 IPL]. I didn’t, probably because I was stiff from bowling and I couldn’t get my leg up high enough.”

That September, in the Champions League, which was in South Africa, Du Preez garnered enough attention — a 25-ball 46 against South Australia helped, as did cleanbowling MS Dhoni in the semi-final against CSK — to keep himself in the reckoning for the 2011 IPL. And so to the player auction … “I sat in front of my laptop for two days. My name would come up and then go away again. I wanted to put my foot through that laptop [when he was confirmed as unsold]. I didn’t, probably because I was stiff from bowling and I couldn’t get my leg up high enough.”

Self-deprecation comes more easily to Du Preez than to many other fast bowling allrounders. Maybe it was drummed into him early. His first-class debut was for Free State against West Indies in Bloemfontein in December 2003. The visitors batted for all but three overs of the first two days to total 618. But Du Preez’ breezy positivity served him well even in the throes of all that. Four of the six bowlers went for more than a hundred runs each. Not Du Preez, who took 3/75 — among them Shivnarine Chanderpaul, who was bowled for 245 to end a desperate drudge of an innings that lasted almost eight hours into which 369 balls disappeared without trace. That done, Du Preez, batting at No. 10, clipped 56 off 66 balls. Then he dismissed Wavell Hinds and Ramnaresh Sarwan. “I always hated bowling in ‘Bloem’,” Du Preez said, a reference to the unfailingly somnambulant surfaces at his erstwhile home ground. “I don’t think I took one five-for there.” Not quite: he claimed one in first-class cricket and another in a limited overs game. But he spread 14 five-wicket hauls in first-class, list A and significant T20 games among other grounds — despite playing 86 matches of all sorts in Bloemfontein.

Now 38, and after a playing career that never reached international heights but took him to Leicestershire on a Kolpak contract in 2008 and, in 2012, back to Asia for the Uthura Rudras in the Sri Lanka Premier League, he is now coaching. The Free State women’s team were among his first charges. “Sometimes it’s tough because there tends to be more emotion after a bad game. But they’re tougher than a lot of the guys — if they get cut during a game they go back onto the park and play.” Perhaps the most important skill he learnt was to knock on the dressingroom door before he entered: “Yes, that’s crucial.”

Eleven years after her preponed wedding, his wife, Nicola, would expect no less.

First published by Cricbuzz.