How Tutu made Jansen a Test player

“It’s a really sad day for South Africa.” – Lungi Ngidi

Telford Vice | Centurion

THEY were born almost 69 years apart, but both in Klerksdorp. One died on Sunday, hailed worldwide as the hero he was for his courage in the face of evil. The other became, in Centurion on the same day, the first person born this century to play Test cricket for South Africa. Desmond Tutu was 80 days into his 91st year. Marco Jansen was 21 years and 239 days old.

Without the indisputable greatness of Tutu, Jansen would never have marvelled at the pristine perfection of his deeply green, unbaggy South Africa cap, the magic of the new white shirts that had the Protea badge on the front and his name in capitals across the back, and the ridiculousness of being picked ahead of Duanne Olivier. 

Not quite. Jansen wouldn’t have known those joys without Tutu, Albert Luthuli, Lillian Ngoyi, Robert Sobukwe, Miriam Makeba, Steve Biko, Joe Slovo, Oliver Tambo, Ahmed Kathrada, Ruth First, Nelson Mandela and all the other luminaries in the pantheon who fought so long and so hard and sacrificed so much to free all South Africans from bondage mental and physical. Their triumph allowed the world to accept the country into civilisation, and thus back into the realm of international sport from which it had been jettisoned when even enslavers and colonisers could no longer look the other way. Tutu, a force of love, light and life, did more than most to drag South Africa out of darkness and thrust it, imperfect and blinking, onto a path towards democracy.

For a long time, Klerksdorp, since the 1830s a Dutch settler stronghold, then a farming hub, then a gold rush mecca, then an Anglo-Boer War battlefield and concentration camp — racially segregated, of course — and now a dry, dusty sprawl of heavy-set stone buildings brooding in wide streets and stewing in its history, would not have wanted to claim Tutu as its own. He was black, he was Anglican, and he refused to be subservient to the whiteness that was the law of the land. In places like Klerksdorp and far beyond, those were three ominous strikes. It needed remarkable fortitude over decades to keep fouling off the regime’s ever more unfair pitches, until the homerun of something like freedom was finally hammered over apartheid’s wall. 

So the black armbands hastily added to the South Africans’ sleeves when news of Tutu’s death broke shortly before the start of play were especially appropriate. Without Tutu and those like him, there would have been no armbands because there would have been no sleeves to attach them to — because international cricket would not have involved South Africa.

Jansen, who was born in May 2000, or more than six years after the shining day that heralded his country’s first legitimate elections, would have learnt about all that at school. But he would be forgiven for not thinking about any such thing from the instant he discovered that he would play. Not Olivier, who has taken 28 wickets — more than anyone else — at 11.10 in four provincial first-class matches this season? Or Sisanda Magala, who has 15 at 14.33 from two games? Or Glenton Stuurman and his 11 at 18.00 in two matches? Why wasn’t Lutho Sipamla and his 12 at 13.58 in two matches in the squad? Jansen’s numbers — 10 wickets at 12.30 in two games — put him in that ballpark. But if Olivier wasn’t going to play how did we get to Jansen? Cricbuzz asked CSA’s selection convenor, Victor Mpitsang, for the thinking behind Olivier’s omission. He saw the text message but did not reply.

So it fell to Lungi Ngidi to try and explain Jansen being preferred to Olivier: “I wouldn’t know. Everyone’s been preparing well. It was probably a senior [player] call or a management call, because everyone was looking good. We didn’t even know who was going to play. Even myself, having not played in a while, I didn’t know if I was going to get the nod. But, like Dean [Elgar] always says, we pick the best team that we think is going to give us the result. Marco got his debut and I’m very happy for him.”

It seemed Jansen was questioning his presence himself when he loped in to deliver his first effort, a dying swan of a full toss outside off stump that Mayank Agarwal easily put away through point for four. By then not only had Kagiso Rabada and Ngidi sent down four flaccid overs, but South Africa had blown a review: Rabada had brushed KL Rahul’s upper arm, not his bat or gloves. So Jansen wasn’t helped by running into a scene bereft of the requisite tension.

Two dots followed his first ball. Then came an overpitched delivery that Agarwal on-drove silkily for four. And then an offering that veered legside, which was dismissed through midwicket for another boundary. One over, a dozen runs: welcome to the top, Mr Jansen.

Only four runs came off his next three overs, partly because he didn’t venture close to the stumps or bat often enough to be hit. Then he did — too full and too straight, presenting too good an opportunity for Agarwal not to claim another four down the ground. Jansen’s next delivery was sprayed short and wide, and dismissed to the cover point fence.

Why was he playing again? An answer of sorts came immediately: Agarwal’s shoulders spun open to a ball that left him, and the resultant edge flew just above head height towards Quinton de Kock, who dived and dropped a chance he would have expected to hold. More evidence of Jansen’s quality came with consecutive deliveries in his next over, when he induced an edge from Rahul that didn’t carry and beat him outside off.

After lunch, Jansen began his second spell as he had his first — with a gimme that Agarwal muscled through extra cover for four. But, with the first delivery of the fourth over of that spell, Rahul lost his head and nearly his wicket to a rib-tickler that he sent spiralling over the cordon.

There are, thus, reasons for Jansen to look back with a measure of satisfaction on his first day as a Test player. But also reasons for him to know he could have done significantly better. Too often he followed a poor ball with another or, worse, allowed the pressure he had built to escape by sending down something that had no place at this level. 

At 21 years and 239 days old, Jansen can afford such learning experiences. He should take inspiration from Sipamla, who had a similarly underwhelming debut day exactly a year ago on the same ground against Sri Lanka. Having struggled through 14 lacklustre overs in which he took 1/68, a revitalised Sipamla claimed 3/8 in two overs the next day and finished the match with six wickets. 

Jansen could also follow the example of Rabada and Ngidi, who redeemed themselves through discipline and consistency, and by showing patience while the sun hardened a surface whose early dampness slowed the ball without offering the expected reward of seam movement. Swing was there little.

Ngidi ended only the second century opening stand scored by any of South Africa’s opponents at this ground — and just the fifth of 50 or more — by trapping Agarwal in front for 60 midway through the second session with a ball that looked to be sailing high and wide. On referral, and after a lengthy delay, Hawk-Eye said otherwise. 

“I thought it was a good shout,” Ngidi told on online press conference. “If anything, I thought it was going to be umpire’s call. But when Marais [Erasmus] kept his finger down, then it became a gamble. I thought it had kept low compared to the bounce that I was getting. Trying to convince the team was another situation. But I think ‘Quinnie’ was in [Elgar’s] ear, and he said at worst it would be umpire’s call. When it started taking so long [to reach a decision] everyone started doubting themselves and saying we might have lost a review.” 

With his next delivery, Ngidi had Cheteshwar Pujara caught at short leg by a tumbling Keegan Petersen. An hour after tea, Ngidi drew Virat Kohli into a ragged stroke wide outside off that became a catch at first slip.

Ngidi had last played any cricket in a T20 World Cup warm-up match on October 20, and his most recent first-class outing was the second Test in St Lucia in June. Before Sunday, he had bowled 553 balls in first-class cricket in 2021. Olivier had bowled 1,700 deliveries, Jansen 1,053, and Rabada 990. Perhaps Ngidi’s success on Sunday could be ascribed to freshness.

But it would have needed more than one bowler in decent form to stop India from reaching 272/3 at stumps. Rahul will continue on Monday, hoping to turn his undefeated 122 into something monumental.

If the South Africans need a diversion before play resumes, they might wonder whether Jansen is their tallest ever player. At 2.06 metres, he has 10 centimetres on Morné Morkel, no less. More morbidly, the home side could ponder why an India tour seems to coincide with a significant death. In December 2013, Mandela died on the same day as an ODI between South Africa and India at the Wanderers. In January 2018, the Wanderers Test started the day after the demise of jazz great Hugh Masekela.

And now Tutu. Klerksdorp, like the rest of the country and much of the world, is in mourning. “It’s a really sad day for South Africa,” Ngidi said. Should Jansen amount to a fraction of his fellow Klerksdorper as a human being, nevermind a mere cricketer, he will have done great things.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

End of the rainbow that never was

“For black African players who are not Kagiso Rabada or Temba Bavuma, even now, nothing has changed.” – Aaron Phangiso.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

DO rainbows burn? South Africans are trying hard to set alight what they have been told is theirs. Last week vast sections of Johannesburg and Durban, the country’s biggest cities, were in actual flames stoked by inequality. Also last week a blaze, fuelled by the outrage of those who have suffered decades of racism in cricket, started raging through the game. Those two fires are part of the same engulfing inferno.

Many among Desmond Tutu’s “rainbow people of God” will feel as if that shining image has been destroyed. Was the rainbow worth saving? Did it even exist? No, on both counts. Last week’s ructions made plain that it was at best an invention, and testimony at CSA’s Social Justice and Nation-building (SJN) project has helped explain why.

Some of the testimony, at least. There was always a danger that the SJN would be used to try and launder reputations, and three of the seven black, brown and white players who admitted to attempting to fix during the 2015 franchise T20 competition — and were banned — took that chance. It seems the SJN saw them coming.  

“This forum was not set up to review matchfixing,” Sandile July, one of SJN ombud Dumisa Ntsebeza’s assistants, said during the hearings this week. “We were listening to the other players. It was the process that made them unhappy, which according to them were injustices meted out against them. We are in no way interested in dealing with the details of the matchfixing.”

A link between how black and brown players have been treated within cricket and the consequent descent of some of them into corruption may yet be made, but that would be just a symptom of the disease. More urgent is what the game is going to do about the vast hurt that has been caused, about the causes of that hurt, and about what is going to be done to ensure it stops being caused.

We cannot know whether it has stopped because some of the people who stand accused of inflicting the hurt are now in powerful positions. They have the right of reply at the SJN, and until they exercise it all there is against them is allegations. But there are too many of charges to be dismissed. And they are too serious to look past.

“I was called ‘brown shit’. It used to be a song when we won a game and we were in fines’ meetings. They would sing, ‘Brown shit in the ring, tra la-la la-laa …’ When you are playing for your country, when you have had that victory, you don’t make sense of it. You brush it off but it’s blatantly racist.”

That was Paul Adams.

“It was a humiliating incident where his face was painted with white paint and he felt that he had to reprimand him for having dirty shoes by painting his face white. I was so upset because you can’t do that to young players. It will break their hearts and their spirit. He may have thought that it was going to make him harder and more determined, but you don’t do that. You don’t paint people’s faces white, because you have to go back in history to see what was going on.”

Adams again, on a white coach’s treatment of a black player during a provincial match.

“After my experiences in the Proteas set-up and those of my closest friends, I felt that as a South African I could not support a team that portrayed a false image in public — that it was a united South African team. Since [then] I have rejoiced at every Proteas downfall. I believe that if the South African team had succeeded, then that success would not have been the way that a South African national team should succeed.”

That was Thandi Tshabalala.

“You know, for black African players [who are not] Kagiso Rabada or Temba Bavuma, even now, nothing has changed.

That was Aaron Phangiso.

There have been many more where those stories have come from, and there will doubtless be many more still. A common theme has been the struggle of black players in South Africa’s squad to win selection to the XI — which, apart from the damage done to their psyche, means they earn less than their white counterparts. Another frequently raised issue has been the cold shoulder white players have offered their black and brown squadmates: instances of being shunned socially. Black players have highlighted not being allowed to speak their first language in the dressingroom — which wouldn’t be an issue if Afrikaans, the mother tongue of many whites, wasn’t freely spoken in the same space.

The media has also come in for scrutiny, as it should. How black players are written about and spoken of has differed from the way white players are written about and spoken of, and in unfair ways. Indeed, the way the SJN is being covered is a case in point. Black and brown reporters have delivered daily accounts of testimony. Some white reporters have published barely a word. Another approach — which you see being employed here — is to keep a close eye and wait for themes to develop before trying to put them in context.

But what did we expect? That centuries of systemic, institutionalised, legislated racism disappeared from our society in February 1990, when Nelson Mandela emerged from prison and — instead of demanding justice — told all South Africans to just get along? That whites who had, until then, lived in a world they controlled at the expense of all others would see the evil of their ways and give up their privilege? That all South Africans would, in fact, just get along? That cricket could escape all that? How?

The unrest in our streets last week was an inkling of how big this thing already is, nevermind how big it could get. The affluent must not be allowed to get away with the fudge that people risking contracting Covid-19 and arrest to steal baby formula from looted supermarkets are common thugs. We live in a dystopia where property owners think nothing of using garden hoses to wash the homeless off the pavements in front of their houses and apartment buildings, and think that because they have private medical insurance they are entitled to a bed in a hospital ahead of those who are forced to rely on the state.

Cricket is a small part of all that, but it is a prominent part. And even more so now that the SJN hearings are underway. South Africa’s men’s squad is far away in Ireland. Mark Boucher spoke freely when asked about the violence at home, and what impact it was having on the squad. But, approached for comment on claims made at the SJN, he reportedly demurred and was quoted as saying his “full focus and energy is concentrated on the Proteas”. How could proceedings at the SJN not affect him and his players? 

South Africans would be right to be gobsmacked by the inconsistency, as they might have been during the tour to West Indies when Quinton de Kock was happy to discuss his support for rhino conservation but would not go into his reasons for refusing to kneel before matches. While we’re at it, some of the reporters who were quick to ask Boucher for his thoughts on the riots have steadfastly ignored anything to do with taking a knee.

And so we come to the end of the rainbow that never was. There is no pot of gold here. There are only ashes. Now what? “These things should never happen and if we take this forward in the right way we will have a lot more respect for each other. It is something that should not be brushed under the carpet. We should air it‚ if we want our teams within CSA to have the right ethics‚ the right mentality‚ the right respect for one another‚ we should air these things.”

Paul Adams for president.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Truth? Yes. Reconciliation? Not even close.

“Those named will be given opportunity to respond to accusations made against them.” – Chris Nenzani on CSA’s plans to tackle racism.

TELFORD VICE | Cape Town

SOUTH African cricket’s conversation about race, currently fluent and febrile, is to be formalised. That could staunch the passion and prejudice that has been poured into public discourse in the past few weeks. But many will hope for the opposite outcome: that official intervention only fuels the healthily ungovernable discussion that has caught fire since July 6, when Lungi Ngidi voiced his support for the Black Lives Matter movement.

Painful testimony and opinions for and against have raged on many platforms, prompting Cricket South Africa (CSA) to launch the Social Justice and Nation Building (SJNB) project, which had its inaugural gathering on Sunday. State television broadcast an interview with Cricket South Africa (CSA) president Chris Nenzani on Thursday in which he elaborated on the meeting between 30 and 40 black and brown former players and members of board.

“We are willing to and we are going to take action,” Nenzani said. “We made a commitment to the [former] players that this is not going to be a talk shop. We are going to take action. There is going to be a plan of dealing with the past to ensure that it does not again happen.”

CSA have promised to appoint, by the end of August, a transformation ombudsperson who will conduct hearings that offer hope for healing. “Players are going to state their experiences,” Nenzani said. “They’re going to recount their unfortunate stories within our system.”

That will provide an outlet for decades of hitherto silent suffering, as well as produce allegations that could be construed as damaging, even criminal. “Those who are named or mentioned in those hearings will be given opportunity to respond to those accusations or those statements that might have been made against them,” Nenzani said.

“Based on that, the office of the ombudsman, which is going to be properly capacitated and resourced, will have to make investigations. And then make findings and recommendations. Based on those recommendations CSA will have to take action.”

This will sound familiar to South Africans because it is similar to what happened at a broader level in the aftermath of apartheid. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) identified 22,025 victims of human rights violations committed between 1960 and 1994. But it received only 7,111 applications for amnesty. So, sadly, it exposed exponentially more truth than it realised reconciliation.

The TRC is held up across the world as a model for how the oppressed should deal with their oppressors. But in South Africa it is remembered chiefly for the image of Desmond Tutu, the courageous clergyman, Nobel Peace Prize winner and TRC chair, laying his head on the table in front of him as he wept. That was in reaction to testimony he heard in the East London City Hall on April 16 1996, the second day of what would be more than two years of hearings, from Singqowakana Malgas — an activist who suffered strokes after being repeatedly tortured by police, who burned down his house and murdered his son by pouring acid on him.

CSA are unlikely to have to hear of such horrors in their attempt to uncover the truth about racism in the game. But it is undeniable that cricket, as run by whites, was a cog in the machine that led to atrocities like that. And so, just as the TRC couldn’t give most of those it heard what they deserved, CSA’s attempts to facilitate restorative justice face an uphill battle.

“You’re dealing with the legacy of a system that was in place for centuries — discrimination is not new in South Africa,” Nenzani said. “Our view has always been to say that inasmuch as you transform society you should not polarise society.

“Many of the possible culprits or perpetrators are no longer part of our system. But what has happened now has given credence to the fact that there’s a body of players in a group that’s very large, and we’re inviting more — surely there are more who are not part of this group currently — to say come and share your experiences.”

CSA are in deep financial trouble with losses projected to reach more than USD59-million by the end of the 2022 rights cycle. How will they pay for the SJNB, much less entertain seriously thoughts of compensating financially those who have suffered?

“We many not have the money at this stage but we have not yet quantified the cost,” Nenzani said. “We are busy drafting the terms of reference. We are busy going through a process of saying what resources are we going to need, and how do we then ensure that we can afford these resources.

“The issue may not necessarily be money. Restorative justice does not necessarily mean that you are going to pay somebody something. But there has to be a sense that a person’s dignity has been restored, and that the system is acting in a way that ensures it does not go back to the unfortunate past. Whether that [restorative action] will be monetary or otherwise is going to be determined by the outcome of the process.”

Nenzani has been CSA president since February 2013 and is due to vacate the position on September 5. Significant ethics and governance lapses at various levels of the organisation in the last two years of his tenure will overshadow previous progress in several areas — not least in making South Africa’s teams more representative of more of the South Africans who play and follow cricket. Thus some racial realism has been brought to a game that at an everyperson level has always been more black, and less white, than has been proclaimed. But, as with the TRC, transformation has bred more truth than reconciliation.

“CSA does not stand for black players,” Nenzani said. “It does not stand for black people. It does not stand for white people. It does not stand for white players. It stands for the people of this country; for all those who play cricket, for all those who support cricket, for all those who are fans of cricket. It includes everybody.

“Therefore when black players have concerns we must address those concerns. When white players have concerns we must address those concerns. Inasmuch as we would want to create an organisation that moves with perfect synchrony, there are challenges in the system because we are part of a South African society that has been divided for many years. Therefore we cannot escape the vestiges of that legacy.”

Cricket is as much a victim of racism in South Africa as it has been a vehicle for spreading and entrenching racism. So it is unsurprising that the wave of wildness that has broken in the wake of Ngidi’s comments has not risen from official sources. Taming that wave by channeling it into the committee room shouldn’t be attempted if the requisite rawness of the moment is to grow strong enough to turn the tide. But here we are, doing exactly that.

Not that this swell will be easily quelled. Neither will it be ridden except on its own terms. Reckoning with racism reduced Tutu, a titan among titans, to tears. What might it do to the far more mere mortals at CSA?

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Desmond and the Springboks do it one more time with feeling

“Good afternoon, molweni, aweh ma se kind.” – Siya Kolisi hits the right note saying hello to Cape Town.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

NOTHING can be the same after Desmond Tutu has danced to Leon Schuster’s Hie Kommmie Bokke on the steps of Cape Town City Hall.

And there the best advertisement for religion was on Monday, all 88 years and not many centimetres of him, busting his moves as the statue of Nelson Mandela looked on not knowing quite what to make to it all.

“Hie kommie Bokke …

“Hie kommie Bokke …

“Hoes!

“Bring vir ons die Wêreld Beker!”

Happily, the multitude crammed into the Grand Parade across Darling Street knew what to do: they cheered the Arch to high heaven. 

He had made a dignified exit by the time Early B took the stage to deliver Back die Bokke, and a good thing too.

“Ek is agter in die yard …

“By my bra se spot …

“Nuh!

“Ons geniet ons met ’n tjop and dop …

“Whuh!

“Dinge gaan net af …

“Vrouens kyk na die toddlers …

“En ons almal wag vir die game van die …

“Bokke!”

The rapper, who looks like he spends at least as much time in the gym as Tendai Mtawarira, strutted his stuff with the Springboks themselves lined up behind him.

Clearly, they had heard it all before enough times to have learnt the lyrics. 

Then it was Siya Kolisi’s turn to address the masses.

“Good afternoon, molweni, aweh ma se kind.”

Even the ears on Mandela’s statue would have heard the roar that earned.

“It’s been a tough journey — we’ve been together for 20 weeks — but I think this week has been the most amazing one; coming back and celebrating with you guys.

“Your message has really been amazing.”

Of course, he had a message in return.

“Look how we’re all different — different races, different backgrounds. But we came together for South Africa.

“Just take a look around you. Look how you are making it special for us.

“It’s time for us South Africans to stop fighting, stop arguing and move forward as a country.”

This being the last leg of a celebration that has taken the all singing, all dancing Boks to Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape in the cause of marking their 32-12 triumph over England in the men’s World Cup final in Yokohama on November 2, Kolisi has had plenty of opportunity to practise his prose.

Not that it showed. There was no questioning his sincerity. The man believes his mantra, perhaps because he is his own best example of the magic conjured when it is lived.

Asked earlier at a press conference what the players could do to bottle the joy of the moment and move South Africa’s society forward, Cheslin Kolbe seemed as stunned as if a pass to him had been intercepted.

“Jis; I’m not in the government or anything,” Kolbe said. “I’m just on the field and living my dream.”

But he recovered well enough, and was soon bolting for the tryline.

“Whatever we can do as players we will do to try and put smiles on kids’ and adults’ faces.

“It’s the inches, the little pieces, like that that can really make a big difference in someone’s life.

“And I’m sure that the rest of South Africa, from the president down, they will lay the foundation going forward.

“We have a lot of hope in South Africa, and I’m sure we can get stronger together. That’s what we believe.

“I’m positive for South Africa — I know we will stand together.”

As the Arch might have said, amen to that.

First published by TMG Digital.