Conway goes a long way to find a place he can trust

“He looked at me with those steely eyes of his and he said, ‘I want to play cricket for South Africa and I want to get good marks.’” – Devon Conway’s high school coach, Adrian Norris.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

A superbly fit, overtly competitive, ultimately ordinary off-spinner leaves Pietermaritzburg for Nottingham and becomes Kevin Pietersen. An unflashy allrounder goes from Johannesburg to Wellington and turns into Grant Elliott. They are among a slew of examples where those came from: South Africa. Devon Conway added his name to the list this week.

Conway’s 200 at Lord’s made him the 111th man to reach a century on Test debut and the 12th from South Africa. Sort of. Andrew Hudson, Jacques Rudolph, Alviro Petersen, Faf du Plessis, Stiaan van Zyl and Stephen Cook know the feeling of making a hundred in their first Test. So do Kepler Wessels and Keaton Jennings.

But Wessels’ 162 at the Gabba in November 1982 was scored from under a not exactly baggy green helmet, while Jennings made his 112 at Wankhede in December 2016 wearing three lions rampant. As did Andrew Strauss for his 112 against New Zealand in May 2004 at Lord’s, Matt Prior for his unbeaten 126 against West Indies in May 2007 also at Lord’s, and Jonathan Trott for his 119 against Australia at the Oval in August 2009.

Conway’s headgear is black and emblazoned with a silver fern. At his high school, St John’s College in Johannesburg, it didn’t matter much on Wednesday that he does not don the protea badge. “We watched bits and pieces [on television] between classes,” Adrian Norris, the master in charge of cricket and a major influence on the player Conway has become, told Cricbuzz on Thursday. “He got to 30, and then we had load-shedding for three hours. So we kept track online from 30 until he was about 105, when we were able to watch again.”

Norris’ words help explain why Conway moved from Joburg to Wellington in August 2017. South Africa’s poorly maintained infrastructure means there isn’t enough electricity to keep all of the country’s lights on all of the time. So, sporadically since January 2008 and sometimes for days and weeks on end, scheduled rolling blackouts share the darkness. Sometimes your lights are off while your friends’ kilometres away are on. Sometimes it’s the other way around. You know when you will be able to cook dinner by consulting an app — several are readily available — on your smartphone.

Load-shedding has become emblematic of a South Africa that is failing to meet the expectations of a nation that, by defeating apartheid at the ballot box in April 1994, thought its worst days were behind it. Twenty-seven years on, we know our trust was misplaced.

“Devon was always the type of person who wanted trust,” Norris said. “We made sure we looked after him — we would get him something to eat, because sometimes he would skip the boarding school breakfast — and then he produced the goods and scored hundreds. He’s a very loyal person. It’s difficult to get into his trust, but once you’re in there you will be for life. He’ll do anything for you.”

Maybe Conway couldn’t trust South Africa enough to want to continue to make a life and a career there. Aged 26, he sold his home, his car and much of the rest of his material possessions and, with his partner, headed for New Zealand.

He had had a solid junior career — he made two half-centuries for Gauteng’s under-13 side, a hundred for the under-15s, and two centuries and a double ton for the under-19s. He scored 13 centuries in provincial first-class cricket. But at the higher franchise level, where he played only 21 matches in more than six years, Conway never reached three figures in 36 innings. So how big a role did cricket play in his decision?

It’s a worn trope that South Africa chases away some of its best and brightest in the cause of trying to make its national teams look more like the nation they represent. Did Conway feel hard done by because he is white? “Absolutely not,” Norris said. “In all our conversations we’ve had, he has never brought that up. He and his partner just wanted a different life experience, and that’s what they’ve got.”

Norris spoke of an apartment near the Wanderers, paid for by Gauteng cricket, that housed some of the province’s most promising players. Conway was among them. “In that flat lived five or six black African guys who were his mates. At times he would get picked ahead of them, and at times one of them would get picked ahead of him. I think he would have said, ‘These are my mates. How can I say I’m not getting picked because of the colour of my skin? They’re getting picked because they’re good enough.’”

A less often acknowledged aspect of the race dynamic is that, were it not for South Africa’s efforts to equalise opportunities across the game, world cricket would likely never have heard of Makhaya Ntini, Hashim Amla, Vernon Philander or Kagiso Rabada. Their talent and skill was undoubted and they worked hard for the success they earned. But talent, skill and hard work aren’t enough in a society more cruelly skewed in favour of the affluent than any other. The affluent are disproportionately white.

All but one of the South Africans who have won Test caps playing for other countries have come from relatively affluent whiteness. They, or their families, have had access to means to change their realities. Those means have been purposefully denied others. At 26, Conway owned property and a car and other stuff worth buying. Millions of his comparatively less well-off compatriots, almost all of them black and brown, their prospects for a decent life stolen from them by substandard education, low level jobs — if they have work at all — and life in a tin shack — if they are not surviving on the street — have nothing to sell and no hope of starting over somewhere else. That is by design, not accident. The single exception proves the rule: Basil D’Oliveira had to rescue himself, with John Arlott’s assistance, from just such an existence to show the world how well he could play cricket. The world outside South Africa, that is.

Even so, Conway is not a cookie-cutter example of privilege — he needed a bursary to gain entry to one of the country’s most elite schools. “I remember that interview,” Norris said. “I asked him why he wanted to come to St John’s, and he looked at me with those steely eyes of his and he said, ‘I want to play cricket for South Africa and I want to get good marks.’”

Did it sadden Norris that New Zealand, not South Africa, is reaping the benefits of the first half of that ambition? “Kids who come through our hands, we obviously want them to represent their country of birth. But the reality of the situation is that he is representing himself and challenging himself at the highest possible level. The world has become so small. Sportsmen will go overseas because that’s where the money is.”

Umpteen cricketminded reactionaries have been spewing ill-considered race politics on social media since about the time the power went out at St John’s on Wednesday. That professional sport in South Africa is too small and impoverished to contain all the talent the country produces is not a truth often aired there. Conway himself was in the same dormitory at St John’s boarding facility as Scott Spedding, who captained the first XV and went on to play 23 Tests for France, and Kenyan-born Brit Chris Froome, the four-time Tour de France champion.

“We’ve got a kid at St John’s now who’s just been signed by [top French rugby club] La Rochelle,” Norris said. “And he’s black African. The professional systems overseas are just so much more established. There’s money there. You can go and play [rugby] in the third league in France and you can do very well [financially]. You can play [cricket] for a second-tier county in England and do pretty well for six or seven months of the year.”

Conway has raised himself above and beyond that level, but Norris said he hadn’t forgotten what mattered: “He’s very humble and calm. He never got too hard on himself at school, or too excited. He’s very balanced. Sometimes I’ll send him a message, and it comes back with, ‘Thank you, Sir.’ The ups and downs of cricket over the years have been his classroom. He’s taken all those lessons on board and he’s now producing the goods.”

Not that Norris was trying to hog Conway’s limelight: “It’s madness to claim an individual.” He listed Jimmy Cook, Graham Ford, Grant Morgan as instrumental in moulding the new toast of New Zealand — the seventh man to score a double century on Test debut and the first debutant foreign opener to get to three figures on England’s seaming pitches.

Norris also made a case for schools like St John’s no longer existing chiefly to prop up privilege, even if from outside their tall walls it can look like that is still their mission: “We’re here to expose kids to different aspects of life and to turn them into good human beings.”

By the look and sound of him these past two days, and quite apart from his brilliant batting, Conway would seem to have added his name to that list, too.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa’s truth in black and white

“I’m not going to beat around the bush – it’s been a challenge, especially when it all unfolded.” – Enoch Nkwe on his demotion.

TELFORD VICE in Port Elizabeth

IN the white corner, Temba Bavuma. And in the black corner, Faf du Plessis. Ladies, gentlemen and others, let’s get ready to stumble down a rabbit hole drilled deep into the faultlines of South Africa’s society by racially charged doublespeak and innuendo that will set your head spinning with confusion and frustration. Best, then, we get this straight from the outset: Bavuma and Du Plessis have been hopelessly miscast, by the spluttering classes, as the ultimate hero and the incorrigible villain of a saga exponentially more complex than anything two mere players could engineer. They are lightning rods on churches as opposed dogmatically as they are diametrically, and they are being struck with alarming frequency by ill-aimed, poorly-reasoned bolts of idiocy.

Outrage at Bavuma being dropped before the second Test against England, after he missed the first match with a hip injury in the wake of a string of low scores, has focused on increasingly outlandish criticism of Du Plessis — not least because South Africa’s captain said “we do not see colour” when he was asked what message Bavuma’s axing would send to black South Africans, who comprise South Africa’s majority in both demographic and cricketminded terms. South Africans voted democratically for the first time in 1994, but they are decades away from achieving democracy. If you’re South African and you think you don’t see colour, best you have your eyes tested, or consider the level of privilege you enjoy that allows you to say something so bizarre, or both.

Du Plessis is white in a society still heavily skewed in his race’s favour on almost every front, particularly socially and economically. Bavuma is black, and although he is solidly middleclass he is a totem for the struggles of mostly poor black players — batters in particular — to advance in the game. His sidelining was, for many, the last straw in the steady whitening, in recent weeks, of a sport that has spent the best part of the past 30 years trying, not always sincerely, to make itself look more like the nation it purports to represent. That the installation in important positions of Jacques Faul, Graeme Smith, Mark Boucher and Jacques Kallis — all of them white — followed the dismal failure of Cricket South Africa’s (CSA) black-led operations arm, led by now suspended chief executive Thabang Moroe, and board, where Chris Nenzani has somehow clung to the presidency, only fuels the racial polarisation. The black voices now questioning the slew of white appointments most loudly were oddly silent for the months that Moroe and Nenzani spent making damaging decisions that brought cricket perilously close to disaster as a professional and cultural enterprise. Consequently those voices have no credibility. Conversely, too many whites have heralded the new appointments without interrogating the suitability of some of the new brooms in either cricket or political terms. All that matters, to them, is that those new brooms are white.

Besides Bavuma, another victim of all that, from the black perspective, is Enoch Nkwe, who went to India as South Africa’s interim team director — or head coach — in September and returned in October with a drawn T20 series and a 3-0 thrashing in the Tests. He was replaced, permanently, by Boucher and, worse yet, if you adhere to this narrative, demoted to serve as his assistant. And that despite the fact that Nkwe is the more qualified of the two. “I’m not going to beat around the bush — it’s been a challenge, especially when it all unfolded,” Nkwe said on Tuesday. “But I believe I’m mature enough to deal with the situation. By the time we got to the camp [before the current Test series against England] I felt very strong and confident I can make a massive impact in a different role. I’ve enjoyed the role. Boucher has been very supportive. He’s given me the platform to make a difference in the team, to contribute as much as possible; whether it’s in team routines or in training. We’ve worked closely together. I’m enjoying the partnership. He’s very relaxed. As much as he’s intense when it comes to business time — just like any other coach — he cares a lot about the team.

“It wasn’t an easy call to make but when I met with [CSA acting chief executive] Jacques Faul and ‘Bouch’ and Graeme [Smith, the acting director of cricket], it was pretty clear. They were very realistic in terms of what has happened. They showed a lot of care. For me, it’s always been about the country. It’s never been about me. My playing days are gone. I am here to coach human beings. I am here to coach cricketers to get better. Unfortunately things happened the way they happened and I had to put my ego aside and focus on what the country needs, and I felt that even in this capacity I can make an impact.” 

How did Nkwe feel about the reaction to the downward kink in his career path? “I appreciate the support the South African people have given me. They’ve been behind me. I can gaurantee them that I’m going to give it my full, 100% effort. I’ll make sure we do our utmost not to let the country down. Yes, there’s different energies and different minds. But there hasn’t been a hierarchy. We all pull in the same direction. Boucher’s been superb in that — he includes everybody in terms of going in a certain direction. He’s made it clear from the start which direction we need to go.”

At least Nkwe is still in the dressingroom. Bavuma has been sent down to franchise level to play for the Lions. But, Nkwe said, although Bavuma was out of sight he was not out of mind: “I strongly believe he’s a good player, and he’s in the process of making sure that — from a mental, emotional and skills point of view — when he gets an opportunity to come back, whether it’s in the next Test match or in a different format, he takes ownership of his position and does 10 times more than what he has done. We’re confident and believe in him. Boucher is the same, and the rest of the team. All I’m going to ask is that we are more patient.

“If maybe a bit of luck went his way he would have got two or three more hundreds, but those things we’ve put behind us. I know that, having spoken to him recently, he is someone that actually looks forward to getting that opportunity. He wants to be in this environment and hopefully in the future he performs well enough and he can lead the team because I know having worked with him, he is a strong leader, very smart. He is able to lead a massive group to greater heights.”

That sounded like an endorsement for Bavuma as a future captain. Could he do the job, and do it well? “In my mind, yes. I can see that happening. But he does understand that he needs to put in some performances. The future could be in a year’s time, it could be in two years’ time. We don’t know. But, having worked with him in the last year-and-a-half, he has got the qualities, there’s no question around that. I wouldn’t be surprised if, after Faf, he takes over.”

For that to happen, especially in the eyes of their detractors, the new regime will have to prove their transformation credentials beyond what they have done so far. Apart from their cricketing claims to a place in the team, the three debutants in the first two Tests against England — Rassie van der Dussen, Dwaine Pretorius and Pieter Malan — are all white. But Nkwe argued otherwise: “[Transformation is] not something that has been ignored. It just so happens that things have turned out this way. We are really working hard behind the scenes to build a strong pool of players to come through. We’ve looked at the high performance system to make sure that we can produce and make sure we are a well transformed team in the future, a true rainbow nation. And there’s no doubt that’s going to happen in the very near future. I have had a chat with Graeme and he is fully behind it. People maybe might not see it but he really cares and he has put in a lot of processes and a lot of plans behind the scenes to make sure that, in the near future, there are no questions on that topic.” Tell that to the many inquisitors aching to know why Bavuma has been cast aside but not Du Plessis. They will doubtless shift their opportunistic focus onto Nkwe to slur him as an Uncle Tom and a sellout.

It is true that Du Plessis has gone seven innings without a half-century and last made a century 16 innings ago. So where does he get off saying Bavuma will need “weight of runs” for the Lions to regain his place in South Africa’s team? But the bigger picture captures a more relevant reality. In his 65 Test innings, Bavuma has scored 1,812 runs with a sole century. Sixty-five trips to the crease into Du Plessis’ Test career, he had six hundreds among his 2,508 runs. His most recent 65 innings have brought 2,167 runs and five centuries. Leaving aside the disruption that dropping a tough, seasoned, inspirational leader would do to the confidence of a dressingroom that has only just emerged from the gloom of the World Cup and the tour of India by beating England in the first Test of the since levelled series, dispensing with Du Plessis on the grounds of his recent batting form — which has been some of the best in his team — would be lunacy. And who would replace him? Bavuma, a fine player who will rediscover himself, but who has scored nine and 17 since returning to the Lions?

Still, some will refuse to see past their own clumsy, limited agenda and continue to get in the way of constructive conversation. They have exhausted the indulgence they didn’t merit in the first place, and now they need to see the truth. All they have to do is look: It’s there in black and white. 

First published by Cricbuzz. 

Bring back the boycott

South Africa’s problems are all South Africans’ problems. Not one of us is innocent. All of us are guilty. We need to own that guilt.

TELFORD VICE in London

HANDS up if you remember the long summers and winters of empty ache while, far away across the world, seasons runneth over with international sport played by people who were not us.

The way white people spat the words “Peter” and then “Hain”, the shameless lying in the press and on air that the dross dished up on rebel tours was Test cricket and rugby, the Springboks shamefully allowed to keep touring and playing long after the extent of the evil was known, the denial writ large on the blank faces of the delusionists pretending all was normal …

I remember. I was there. I lived through it. South Africa’s forced exclusion from world sport was the white noise of my growing up. I could hear the black noise of anger on the street. At least, I could before it dissipated into the smell of fear as state oppression mounted.

The Olympics? Test rugby and cricket? International football? They were for other, supposedly better people. Not for us.

I knew that was as it should have been. That until all South Africans had the same chances in life — not only in sport — the least the rest of the world could do was not allow the apartheid government to, as we say these days, sportwash the murderous truth away.

Politics was sport. Sport was politics. Is, was, always will be. Anyone who believes differently is, at best, stupid, at worst, on the high road to fascism. That offends you? Noted.

I cheered like mad during the 1981 Bok tour to New Zealand — for the protestors. I grew taller with pride every time my father, someone I was irreparably distanced from in all sorts of ways, defiantly and in the face of vicious opposition loudly supported the man he always called “Clay”.

He did so not because Muhammad Ali was a wonderful boxer. He did so because Ali invariably said and did the Right Thing. That my father was an ardent student of the art and craft of smacking someone in the face for a living but knew that Ali’s political bravery was exponentially more important than anything he would do in the ring has shaped me in ways I’m still, at 53, trying to understand.

And here we are, all these years later, and not nearly enough has changed. We still don’t have democracy. What we have is a pretence of democracy for the five minutes it takes to put a cross on a ballot paper every five years.

That’s for those of us who still bother to vote. The rest of us know that’s a waste of time. Whether we vote or not, the government will run on corruption and stink of ineptitude. Just like it did when it was white — when none of the legally available alternatives were noticeably less corrupt and inept, just as they are now.

Too many of us believed the bullshit of the 1995 rugby World Cup. That wasn’t unity. That was marketing. Nelson Mandela was dangerously wrong: sport does not have the power to change the world. Not, at least, for any longer than it takes the cheesy fakery of a beer commercial to shamble across our television screens. That’s even less than the five minutes we fool ourselves, every five years, that we’re a democracy.

The Springbok is the swastika of sport, the symbol of what white supremacy used to do on Saturday afternoons. Yet there the filthy thing still is, leaping on the left sleeve of the jerseys of the team who will, so they have been sold to us, represent South Africa at the men’s World Cup.

Why has the Springbok survived? Because it is a valuable brand. Because it makes money. That it is also a significant part of the story of the depths human depravity has sunk to matters less, apparently. How does that make you feel? How does it make me feel? Sick.

I would feel better if international rugby’s suits, having been reminded this week of how abnormal South African society still is and will be for too many decades hence, threw the Boks out of the World Cup.

Or if India — important figures in South Africa’s expulsion and readmission to international cricket — uninvited the Proteas to their tour there later this month.

At least Zambia have had the balls to tell Bafana Bafana not to turn up in Lusaka for their friendly on Saturday. The South African Football Association’s response has not been to reflect on why that has happened and to empathise with the Zambians, but to try and find replacement opposition. How completely disgusting.

Worse, Banyana Banyana played Botswana in the CAF Olympic qualifiers on Wednesday. It is an outrage that the match went ahead — could the players and the crowd at Orlando Stadium smell the hate drifting in on the smoke from the fires set by the xenophobes they consider compatriots?

How do you talk sense into the heads of people swept up in the irrationality that those who have come from far worse realities than theirs to make lives no-one wants to live are stealing “their” jobs and “their” women? Black South Africans, you are a disgrace.

But you have a way to go to join white South Africans at the bottom of the barrel. There is no reconciling with people who, having done everything wrong for hundreds of years, think they have the right to be treated as equals despite retaining all of their privileges.

The latter calamity has, of course, led to the former. How could it not? And how did we think the main victims of centuries of systemic, institutional racial violence — black men, without whom colonialism and apartheid could not have existed — would manifest their dysfunction if not against women?   

All that’s more pathetic than women calling for the death penalty for perpetrators of gender-based violence is men seeking to distance themselves from those perpetrators by issuing confections of affront at their actions.

Some women seem to think you should go to jail if you kill a man and be executed if you kill a woman. But only if you’re a man. Nevermind that the death penalty doesn’t work, or that men are far more likely to be victims of male violence than women.

As for the shrieks of protest by men about other men, if you had lived their lives would you be that different? Or are you trying to say that being born black and male means being born bad?

Much of the noise made by these men and women rises from that swamp of affluence we call the middle class. How dare we lump these fine citizens with those other, dirtier, poorer South Africans? How could we possibly equate swinging a panga in anger with the lethal buzz of an electric fence securing ill-gotten gains?  

South Africa’s problems are all South Africans’ problems. Not one of us is innocent. All of us are guilty. We need to own that guilt if we are to have any hope of rehabilitating ourselves. 

It will take a lot more than sport to heal South Africa. But reviving the boycott would be a start. It is the least sport could do. Bring back the boycott now and bring it back properly, and to hell with how much money would be lost and whose careers would be cut short.

Hands up if you’re quietly aghast to be South African but will make noise in support of the Springboks at the World Cup?

Shame on you.

Dad? Thanks.

First published by Times SELECT.

John Kani, Antony Sher, Janice Honeyman: SA theatre’s royal family still rule

“These aren’t teething problems. The teeth are falling out of your mouth, and you want to know what the hell is going on.” – John Kani on the state of South Africa’s democracy

Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in London

THE trouble with asking John Kani questions is that he will answer them. And keep answering them; more arrestingly, intelligently and quotably with every enveloping sentence.

He steers the conversation from the highway into the weeds and the bundu beyond, then onto a quiet street, then back to the fast lane, all in the same few paragraphs.

Never should journalists complain that their interview subjects offer too much, but Kani vibrates at an uncommon output frequency. Interviewing him is catching wave upon wave of words that transport you to a place of warmth and happiness. Transcribing him is a bastard of a job.

And he walks his talk. His new play, “Kunene and the King”, co-starring Antony Sher and directed by Janice Honeyman, ended its opening run — at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon — on April 23. The next morning he was off to New York to receive an award, and then to Cape Town, where “Kunene” opened at the Fugard on April 30 and will be until May 25. He’s due on a film set one of these weeks, and after that there are invitations to take the play to London and New York. And another thing: Kani is 75.

“I’m 12 years older than my wife, Mandi, with an i,” Kani said pointedly, padding for the punchline. “So I can’t be old, or I’ll be divorced.”

His laugh is a wide embrace delivered in a voice somehow smooth as well as cracked that, despite decades of internationality acquired from his Johannesburg base, remains thick with the dust of his native Eastern Cape — a place out of step with his headlong rush through life.

“If I don’t know what’s following when I finish something I develop a rash and a restlessness, to the point that my family says, ‘Go do something, even if it’s an advert. Go! We can’t deal with you’.”

With that he veers onto what would be a cobbling of tangents if they weren’t so apposite.

“Everything is urgent. I’m disturbed by this relaxed, lackadaisical, easy attitude that everybody is displaying; almost a non-awareness.

“We’re getting to a point where the millennials are questioning our role in the negotiations to end apartheid.

“We’re even faced with very reckless utterances that maybe we sold out and didn’t negotiate a good deal, and that maybe Mandela wasn’t the leader we thought he was. These things are beginning to worry me.     

“We’re running out of time. We can’t allow history to say we did this badly. Don’t let the next generation inherit the confusion.”

“Kunene” seeks to cut through that confusion. The plot pits two South Africans of a certain age against each other, prejudices, personal experiences, and all. One is a white actor preparing to play Lear who discovers he has liver cancer, the other his black care-giver.  

“He assumes the nurse who’s going to live with him is blonde with blue eyes and big tits, and he finds out it’s a black man,” Kani said.

Sher has indeed played Lear. At 69 he is the grand duke of the British stage who since December 2015 has been married to Gregory Doran, the Royal Shakespeare Company’s creative director.

In November 2017 a schoolchild in India asked Prince Charles who his favourite actor might be, perhaps expecting him to say Shah Rukh Khan. Instead, the royal reply was, “Gracious me! When I think about it there are so many of them. There is a very good actor called Sir Antony Sher who is a brilliant Shakespearean actor, and everything else.”

So, do we call him Sir, a title bestowed in 2000? A drawled chuckle: “Well, only officially.”

Cape Town-born Sher moved to England in 1968 and has officially been British since 1979. But his voice brims with the breeze of the Sea Point promenade on a Sunday afternoon, when all that’s slower is the traffic oozing from Camps Bay.

Being back from whence he came was, as always, “on an emotional and spiritual level, very powerful”, Sher said.

“I’ve lived in the UK for 51 years; much longer than I lived here. Yet I only have to step off the plane at Cape Town airport and I feel a rush of familiar sensations to do with the smells and the nature of the light — the colours of things — that is just irrisistable. It’s in my blood, my DNA. There’s something very rewarding and satisfying about coming back.”

Being parachuted in in the throes of election season hadn’t burst his bubble: “The politics is quite a different thing; so vastly different and better than the South Africa that I left.

“I worried a great deal about South Africa under Zuma, but I hope, if Ramaphosa gets in, the country will be in much safer, more stable hands.”

Herding personalities as contrasting as Kani and Sher onto the same stage successfully is a challenge, even if they are firm friends. But Honeyman, a Capetonian transplanted to Joburg, has directed each of them five times. She put up with both in The Tempest in 2008, when Sher played Prospero and Kani his Caliban in a production that went from the Baxter in Cape Town to Stratford and five other venues in England.

“We trust each other,” Honeyman said. “It’s been fascinating weaving very different people into a harmonious whole.”

No doubt the plot helped — “The dynamic of the play is one of conflict moving towards harmony,” Honeyman said — but taking the production from one hemisphere to the other, and across cultures, came with complications.

For instance, the “stoep” polish spoken of on the Fugard’s stage was “floor” polish in Stratford. Not that all the differences were that easily resolved.

“English audiences are fascinated by the process of dismantling apartheid and getting to 25 years of democracy,” Honeyman said. “South Africans have lived through it, and that puts pressure on us.”

Good thing, then, that Kani thrives on exactly that. Whatever it is, bring it.

His art?

“The individual fascinates me. I see someone standing at a bus-stop, in the street or in front of their house, and I want to do a brain operation and listen to their inner thoughts which are unadulterated by the environment they’re in.”

His politics?

“We have been able to hold the country together, mounted on the pillars of our democracy and ubuntu, drawn from the Freedom Charter of 1955. And we have not veered out of that. We have not become a dictatorship or a failed state, or — like the Americans do sometimes — shut down the government. This is a project in progress.

“I’d give us a B, if I had to grade us. But the outstanding 20% make us look so bad. The corruption! These aren’t teething problems. The teeth are falling out of your mouth, and you want to know what the hell is going on.

“We have over 58-million people, and they want to be part of a postcard with a picture of democracy. And those people have different definitions and understandings of that democracy.”

There was much more where that came from. Easily enough to base a movie on.

* Kunene and the King is at the Fugard Theatre in Cape Town until May 25.