Meet Keegan Petersen: Mr Modernism, the Bauhaus batter

“South Africans don’t just go away and die. We fight for what we believe in and we are very strong.” – Keegan Petersen

Telford Vice | Cape Town

IF you watched Keegan Petersen in the Test series against India, you know he’s a serious man. The diligence, the stickability, the unflusterability, the beautiful care he showed marked him out as someone not to be dismissed as a lightweight.

Or someone to dismiss easily. He faced more than 100 balls in half of his six innings, and never fewer than 22. He batted for at least an hour four times, and for 59 minutes in the second innings at Centurion. He was at the crease for more than four hours in the first innings at Newlands, and for more than three hours in the second dig. In the first innings at the Wanderers, he was there for three minutes short of three hours.

He was much more than there. Petersen scored important runs in a team not expected to score many. He did so on pitches that did not favour batters, and against a gun attack. He scored his runs unvarnished: see the ball, hit the ball, run, rinse, repeat.

Precocious players pose for pictures after they have crafted a noteworthy stroke. Petersen is many things, but he is not precocious. He plays a shot, takes the runs he has earned, and plays another. Or defends and defends and defends until there is an opportunity to pierce the field. There is nothing ornamental about his batting. If Jacques Kallis was Baroque, Petersen is Mr Modernism: the Bauhaus batter. Everything needed is in its right place, for as long as it’s needed. Then it isn’t and we start again. It is a perfect economy of requirement, intent and movement. 

“It keeps me switched on somehow,” Petersen told Cricbuzz about his approach to batting. “It’s nice … well, not nice. But it does make me feel that I have to be there all the time, in the present. And I have to work for everything. That makes you appreciate it more.”

That’s not to say watching Petersen bat is dull. Anything but, because there’s a lot going on. It takes flinty intelligence to play like he does and not only survive but prosper. If you think properly about what you’re doing it will look easy. Even, or especially, when it isn’t. You can see Petersen’s smarts not only in the choices he makes, but in the modesty of his movements. He’s got this. The emotion comes after he has finally been dismissed. He and Bjorn Borg would have plenty to talk about.  

This comes from having played 97 first-class matches before you crack the nod. And from making your debut, in St Lucia in June, three months before your 28th birthday. It comes from having lived some life, and taking it to the middle with you. It’s the knowledge of what matters, and what doesn’t. And it never stops evolving.

“In the first Test [against India at Centurion, where he scored 15 and 17], I batted like I would in domestic cricket, and I thought success is just going to come. After that Test I knew I had to work harder than I usually do to get the runs. It made me realise that it’s a step up. You are playing against the best team in the world, and they don’t give you much. I had to work for every run.” If that makes it seem Petersen learnt a lot about his game during the series, prepare to be surprised: “Not really. I’m always going to be the same.”

He is no stranger to hard work. Since readmission in 1991, only seven players have waited longer — in terms of first-class caps — to earn a Test call-up for South Africa. Stephen Cook is at the top of the list with 165, and Stiaan van Zyl just behind Petersen with 96.

“I was fortunate to start playing first-class cricket when I was still a kid, fresh out of school [at 18, in February 2012],” Petersen said. “So there were guys ahead of me. I played with the previous generation and I played with a lot of guys. Like Jacques Kallis. His last game for the Cobras [in February 2014], I was part of that squad. It’s been a long time, but I wouldn’t have done it any differently. My journey has been my journey and it’s unique. Even though I had to learn my trade for longer, that’s fine. I’m happy it came when it came.”

The all-time record for a South African late bloomer is held by Peter Kirsten, who had played 270 first-class games by the time he walked onto Kensington Oval in Bridgetown on April 18, 1992 — less than a month before he turned 37 — as one of 10 debutants. The exception was the captain, Kepler Wessels, who had 24 Test caps for another team whose colours are green and gold. But that was, of course, different: apartheid, isolation, and all that. Speaking of that other green and gold side, Mike Hussey was 176 matches and 15,313 runs into his first-class career when he made his Test debut for Australia.

Some of Test cricket’s belated beginners stick it out at the top. Some who haven’t had to pay as many dues do not. Petersen is only five Tests in, and has scored three half-centuries, but it’s difficult to believe he will not be among those who last. He’s the business. It shows in the way he hasn’t been satisfied with being given his chance — he has taken it, too. That hasn’t been true for Zubayr Hamza, for instance, who has class to burn but was able to score only 181 runs in 10 Test innings in 2019 and 2020, and was dropped. Aiden Markram, too, plays like a dream. But he made just 76 in six innings against India and can consider himself fortunate to have been retained for next month’s series in New Zealand.

Of course Petersen isn’t immune to dips in performance. It took him only 10 innings to score a first-class century, but he needed another 19 trips to the crease to make his second. Four innings later, he scored an undefeated 225 — which he followed with centuries in his next two games. First, he had to find his way again; like he did after he came back from the West Indies series with 44 runs in three innings. How do struggling players return to form?    

“You’ve just got to go back to what what you learned when you were a kid, go back to the basics and hope that it will come right. Eventually it does. But you are going to fail. There’s no two ways about it.” How did he know when he was on song? “I don’t know. The scoreboard will tell me.”

There was no flippancy in that answer, just a sobering seriousness that was apparent in a different way when he joined the Zoom call for this interview: he did so three minutes earlier than the appointed time. Up popped an image far removed from the cauldron of Test cricket. Casually clad, he sat on a couch. Family photographs were on the wall behind him. Happily, the bio-bubble had burst and something like real life had flooded into the void. “It’s what we long for, just a bit of normality.” It’s never that simple for people in the news. We spoke three days after the end of the Test series. How many interviews had he given? “Since then? I’ve lost count.”

So he would be forgiven fuzziness on how he came to be stationed at leg slip after one delivery of the third day’s play at Newlands. Not a chance: “Dean [Elgar] is going to hate me for saying this, but it was my idea. I told him the ball before that. I’m like, maybe we should just have a leg slip. He thought about it and said, ‘Okay go.’ And then the very next ball it happened.”

Marco Jansen pitched the delivery on leg stump. Cheteshwar Pujara tried to deflect it downward, but the bounce undid him. Still, it needed a lightning dive and a stabbing right hand for the airborne, horizontal Petersen to take the catch. That’s what experience does: it reminds you, sometimes subliminally, about what has worked in the past. 

Pujara and Virat Kohli had come together the previous evening after India had slipped to 24/2 in their second innings. They had added 33, and built the lead to 70, when Petersen, sensing the import of the moment, pounced. “The game was in the balance at that time because we knew that they were the big wickets. We had to make a play somehow, and I just felt at the time, with Marco bowling … he’s uncomfortable to face for anyone. He’s tall, lanky, and he unsettles a lot of guys. So I just had a feeling that I had to be there at the time.”

Trusting that feeling is another matter, particularly in a match against the No. 1 ranked team with the series on the line. And it can’t be easy finding the confidence to speak up when you’re a junior member of the side. It good to know, then, that the seniors are listening. “We try and help out Dean wherever, because he can’t captain every point of the game. He’s a really open guy and he won’t just shrug you off. He takes all of our suggestions on board. So when someone has a gut feel, they speak out about it.”

Could that be happening at least partly because a team shorn of all of their established batting stars have internalised that the buck stops with whoever is at the crease? The last of the big names, Quinton de Kock, retired from Tests after Centurion. It’s as if those he left behind are playing for each other more than they did when they could rely on De Kock, Faf du Plessis, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Graeme Smith or Kallis to do more than their share of the heavy lifting. South Africa proved to themselves that they are more than the sum of their comparatively modest parts by rallying to win at the Wanderers and at Newlands. “The odds were against us, so that makes the victory taste more sweet. When ‘Quinny’ retired nobody expected it. We will miss him, but cricket goes on.”

It helps, no doubt, that what might be termed a likebloodymindedness prevails among the frontline batters. So it isn’t difficult to connect the dots between Elgar, Petersen, Rassie van der Dussen and Temba Bavuma. They share a brand of defiance that puts lumps in even the most jaded throats, and that doesn’t have to spark centuries to get the job done. This is as close to socialism as cricket gets, as epitomised by Van der Dussen grinding out an unbeaten 41 off 95 balls and in two-and-a-half hours to steer South Africa home in the deciding Test. “The 20s, 30s and 40s Rassie scored were massive for us,” Petersen said. “I think he’ll remember those innings better than his hundreds by the end of his career.”

There was more where that came from: “We’ve got strong characters in our changeroom. South Africans don’t just go away and die. We fight for what we believe in and we are very strong. Our captain is an extremely strong character and is the perfect guy to lead this group right now because it’s what this team and this country longs for. And we needed this win, to be dead honest.”

Petersen spoke from his father’s house in Paarl, where he spent a few days after the series. Dirkie Petersen, no mean player himself, was his son’s most important coach during his formative years and remains a valued source of advice and encouragement. But he has yet to see his prized pupil play a Test first-hand, what with the first two in the Caribbean and, because of the BCCI’s pandemic fears, spectators not being allowed during the India series. That had an upside.

“My dad is a nervous character, so he doesn’t really want to come watch. Because he goes crazy. But I’m glad I haven’t score a hundred yet because I’d like him to be there when it does happen.”

There is, as there is in everything Petersen does on a cricket ground, plenty in those few words: honesty about his father’s disposition, but a desire to please him nonetheless. And there’s this — when Petersen scores a century. Not if. Seriously.  

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Dr Jansen and Mr Marco

“We are good friends but sometimes on the field things get heated.” – Marco Jansen on his confrontation with Jasprit Bumrah.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

CRICKET grounds do strange things to people. Some use them as personality mirrors: they see themselves in full only in the middle. To others they are ego boosters: they are who they were before they crossed the boundary, only more so. To Marco Jansen, the cricket ground is where he goes to be someone else.

“I am a bit of an introvert, but when I’m on the field that’s the one place where I want to express myself,” Jansen said in material released by CSA on Monday. “Especially playing the sport that I love, the sport I’ve wanted to play since I was a child. All those emotions just show the passion and love I have for the game. If there is one place where I feel I can show my passion and emotions, it’s on the field.”

Jansen’s first language is Afrikaans. But that’s not the only reason his speaking voice in English is barely above a baritone whisper. You can hear him mulling and measuring every word before he allows it into the world. He gives the glory of what he has done not to himself but to God. He would seem to be the epitome of humility and cautiousness.

But he showed plenty of passion and emotion in the Test series against India. He made a surprise debut in the first Test at Centurion ahead of Duanne Olivier — who was building up his bowling loads in the wake of recovering from Covid-19 — and did well enough to keep his place for the other two matches.

The 21-year-old, 2.09-metre tall, left-arm fast bowler finished the rubber with 19 wickets — one behind series leader Kagiso Rabada — at an average of 16.47, a touch behind Lungi Ngidi’s 15.00. He also scored only 16 fewer runs than Aiden Markram in two fewer innings than the opener. Most importantly, he announced himself as a quality quick, all booming bounce and awkward angles, and a cutthroat competitor.

We saw plenty of the latter at the Wanderers, where Jansen’s response to serving as a target for the India fast bowlers’ bouncers was to engage Jasprit Bumrah physically and verbally. First he hit Bumrah on the shoulder with consecutive deliveries. Then he let loose a stream of invective, which caused Bumrah to lose his rag. He hacked a catch to point off Ngidi 16 balls later.

The incident proved a precursor to India’s emotional meltdown in the third Test at Newlands, where Virat Kohli, R Ashwin and KL Rahul were undone mentally by a DRS decision that reversed Dean Elgar’s leg-before dismissal by Ashwin. Their immature antics included screaming allegations of cheating by the broadcasters — who have no control over DRS — into the stump microphone. The unseemly tantrum marked a turning point: South Africa scored 41 runs in the remaining nine overs of the day, having scored only 19 in the nine overs preceding that moment. The next day they won by seven wickets to seal a 2-1 series triumph over the No. 1 ranked team, and to retain their unbeaten record against India at home.

Jansen was an important part of that success story: “I hoped to do well but I didn’t expect to do that well. They haven’t won a series in our conditions, and I’m glad we kept it that way.”

Things didn’t look like panning out that way on the first day of the series, when flaccid bowling allowed India to cruise to 272/3. Jansen’s contribution to that sorry story was 17 overs in which he went wicketless for 61, and looked as flat as those figures suggest.

“I didn’t start the way I wanted to,” he said. “I was very, very nervous. It’s normal for every player to get nervous. But I was very happy that after that innings I came back and contributed.” And how. He dismissed Bumrah to take his first Test wicket and end that innings, and claimed 4/55 in the second dig, a haul studded with the wickets of Mayank Agarwal, Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane.

India won by 113 runs, but South Africa levelled matters at the Wanderers with an exemplary display of fourth-innings batting under pressure. Besides rattling Bumrah, Jansen took 4/31 and 3/67. His figures at Newlands were 3/55 and 4/36. He was a consistent threat even to India’s finest batters: he dismissed Rahul three times and Agarwal, Cheteshwar Pujara and Rishabh Pant twice each.

But it’s his altercation with Bumrah that many will remember the longest, not least because they were in the Mumbai Indians’ squad last year. Bumrah played in both games that featured Jansen. “We are good friends but sometimes on the field things get heated,” Jansen said. “You’re playing for your country so you’re not going to back down for anyone. And he did the same. There’s no hard feelings, it was just in the heat of the moment, two players giving their all for the country.”

With him in India was Duan Jansen, his identical twin brother and also a tall, left-arm fast bowler. The only discernible difference between them is that Duane is four centimetres shorter. “We grew up together and we know everything about each other, and he is my best friend,” Marco Jansen said. “It’s weird in some way that we are basically the same player. Sharing the journey with him is something special. We love each other very much and we share everything with each other.

“He came along [to the IPL] as a net bowler. He practised with us. And he also learnt a few things. It was a great experience for him and for us to experience that together. It’s amazing. We never would have thought we would be sitting here, both of us, playing the sport we love.”

Marco Jansen’s next chance to pinch himself to make sure he isn’t dreaming could come as soon as Wednesday, when the three-match ODI series starts in Paarl. “That’s a call-up I did not expect. I just want to go there and try and learn as much as possible. If I get an opportunity, hopefully I grab it with both hands.”

As we’ve seen, God-fearing introvert or not, he isn’t shy to do exactly that.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Talk is cheap, except when it takes wickets

“You are an immensely respected cricketer within our group and at the moment I don’t think you are conducting yourself extremely well.” – Dean Elgar to Kagiso Rabada.

Telford Vice | Wanderers

WHEN, exactly, did Dean Elgar light the rocket that returned Kagiso Rabada to the stratosphere of fast bowling, fuelling his launch to 3/12 in 11 of his deliveries that proved a key difference in the second Test between South Africa and India at the Wanderers?

For whatever reason, Elgar didn’t want to answer that question after his team won by seven wickets to level the series, leaving a decider looming at Newlands on January 11. What he did say, in an online press conference, was this: “I went up to ‘KG’ and I said to him, ‘You are an immensely respected cricketer within our group and at the moment I don’t think you are conducting yourself extremely well.

“I know what ‘KG’ is capable of. When he’s got his tail up there’s no better bowler, and I have experienced quite a few guys who have been part of this team. It was a good chat. I can have those chats with ‘KG’ and he responds extremely well. He takes it away, he lets it process and thinks about it overnight and then he comes back the next day with a scenario for me.”

Perhaps the “chat” happened before the third day on Wednesday, when India resumed their second innings at 35/2 and South Africa bowled poorly to Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane in a first hour that yielded 66 runs in 14 overs. But Rabada came roaring back, dismissing both India’s set batters and Rishabh Pant in a burst of brilliance that reminded fans of performances earlier in his career. Whatever Elgar said and whenever he said it, it worked. Rabada has claimed only one five-wicket haul in his last 39 bowling innings, but his triple breakthrough on Wednesday was worth at least two wickets more.

“There’s certain guys — Dale Steyn was one of them — who at certain times in his career need harsh words behind closed doors to bring the best out of them,” Mark Boucher told SuperSport. “‘KG’, in that spell he bowled, broke the game open for us. There was a bit of a spark in the dressing room; maybe it was what was needed in order to get him into that space.

“And we know when ‘KG’ is like that it’s difficult to get the ball away from him. But also you want him on your side rather than the opposition team. There were fair words that were said and I think he’s taken it on board and we’re hoping we can get him into that sweet spot again for the next Test because it can only bode well for us.”

Certainly, Elgar was appreciative: “‘KG’ has got that attitude, and he’s got the want and he wants to bowl and he wants to contribute in a massive way. You have to utilise that as a captain.” But he did concede that Rabada “can sometimes be a little bit too relaxed and he needs to understand that his performance on the field and his performance in the change room is huge”.

That the exchange had the desired effect was, Elgar said, mutually acknowledged: “He was the one who came to me and said what we spoke about, I hit the nail on the head.”

Rabada goes to Newlands as the series’ leading wicket-taker with 13 at 19.61. Almost forgotten is the fact that Elgar, who was unbeaten on 96 on Thursday, is South Africa’s top run-scorer with 202 — two behind KL Rahul. To get there, the gritty pugnacious opener has been hit on most parts of his body.

“I’d like to think those knocks that I take make me extra motivated to go out there and perform,” Elgar said. “Some would call it stupid, some would call a brave. I would like to say the latter.

“I’m immensely proud of playing for the Proteas. It doesn’t matter what I go through. I know there’s always a bigger picture, and the bigger picture is for us to win and obviously play a good brand of cricket. And that’s something I’d want to instil into our young group. I want to show the guys that it’s okay to take a few blows, because when you when you perform like that over four days it’s so worth it. It doesn’t just speak for me; it speaks for everyone within our squad.”

They’ll talk again in Cape Town. Perhaps in more difficult conversations.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Rabada is all of us

“His leadership will go a long way in getting us over the line.” – batting consultant Justin Sammons on Dean Elgar.

Telford Vice | The Wanderers

BEING Kagiso Rabada isn’t easy. It means surviving a medusa of expectations — racial, nationalist, professional. And spearheading a Test attack. Along with having a face everybody knows, home and away. No cricketer from this country carries a burden as heavy. Few from anywhere do. Something’s got to give: the individual.

In the South African consciousness, Rabada is not a person. He is an idea, a hope, a prayer, a belief in the kind of society we could have if only we had more Rabadas. That there is only one is a sacred profanity that shall not be uttered despite its truth. Because, in our heads, Rabada is all of us. Thus we are all Rabada.

For the first hour at the Wanderers on Wednesday, we were not at all happy with ourselves. Like the rest of the attack’s, our bowling was as flat as an Eastern Caper’s vowels. If you don’t know how flat that is, try pronouncing flat as flett. 

India were 58 ahead when Lungi Ngidi and Marco Jansen resumed against Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane. Thirty-two runs flowed in the six overs they bowled together, and nothing close to a wicket materialised. Instead Rahane showed the confidence to cut Jansen for six.

We replaced Jansen, and 17 were added in three overs before Olivier returned to relieve Ngidi. Another 17 came in the next five overs. Time for a drink, and perchance to reflect on 14 overs that realised 66 runs and nary an opportunity to make inroads.

What to do? How about bowl shortish on off moving away to Rahane, forcing him to play? How about a simple catch behind to end the stand at 111, the second-fastest century partnership by an India pair in South Africa. In our next over, we smuggled a fullish inswinger past Pujara’s defensive prod and trapped him in front. Then, in our over after that, we rapped Rishabh Pant on the gloves and, with the following delivery, had him running away towards leg as he slashed an edge to the wicketkeeper. With that we had taken 3/12 in 11 balls and bowled our team back into the game.

It wasn’t easy. It never is for us. We could almost hear people everywhere wondering out loud when last we had come up with such a commanding burst. Instead of celebrating the fact that we had this time, meeting the challenge and taking the game to two set batters in a team not short of talent and skill to back up their belief. We deserve better.

South Africa took another 22.4 overs to claim India’s remaining five wickets for 99 runs, 41 of them scored off 40 balls by Hanuma Vihari and the enterprising Shardul Thakur. We didn’t strike again, but our efforts and the inspiration we sparked did more than anything else to keep the game within our team’s grasp.

That’s not to say it will be plain sailing on Thursday. Australia’s 310/8 in November 2011 is the highest successful fourth innings at the Wanderers. South Africa have never made more in those terms here than the 220/6 they scored to beat New Zealand in May 2006. Only in six Tests have teams chased successfully in a fourth innings at this ground, and in two of those the target was under 100.

So South Africa’s order — 240 to win — is taller than any they have yet scaled at the Wanderers, and taller than any they have overcome in their 13 successful fourth innings since they made 414/4 at the WACA in December 2008. Since then, they have been dismissed in the fourth innings 13 times in 108 Tests, in which they have batted second 40 times. It happened most recently at Centurion last week.

Why should that trend be bucked this time, considering the quality of India’s attack, the fact that none of South Africa’s batters currently average 40 and that India have not lost any of their five previous Wanderers Tests, and the likelihood of the pitch deteriorating? An answer of sorts came in the 10th over before stumps when a fearsome bouncer from Jasprit Bumrah nailed Dean Elgar on the grille of his helmet.

Elgar immediately turned himself square of the crease and knelt behind it, a hand atop the handle of his perfectly upright bat held at the end of a dead straight bolt of an arm. The picture was of someone who wasn’t going anywhere quietly. Or quickly. As Justin Sammons, South Africa’s batting consultant, told an online press conference: “He’s a competitor at heart. That’s what he loves about the game and the nature of Test cricket. That brings the best out of him. That allows his character to shine through.”  

Was that delivery born during India’s second innings, when Bumrah lost his composure in comical fashion — all bobbing shoulders and furiously shaking head, showing the impotent rage of an unfortunate taking it upon himself to dispense justice to a queue jumper — in reaction to what looked like a stream of foul-mouthed invective from Jansen? It’s difficult not to think so.

Asked what he thought of Jansen’s role in the altercation between the Mumbai Indians teammates, Sammons said: “It was pleasing to see. You want guys to stand up for themselves and their teammates. You want them to be in it for their team. He’s shown that. He’s a real team man. That’s the character that we’re looking for.”

Elgar also needed medical attention after being hit on the hand by Thakur, and he wore a ball from Mohammed Shami on the biceps. When other players are struck and the medics swoop, worry rises. When it happens to Elgar, it’s confirmation of who people think he is. “Having someone with his character for the guys coming in to bat with is massively important,” Sammons said. “His leadership will go a long way in getting us over the line.”

Thing is, India remain favourites to win. South Africa need only 122 more runs, but the size of that task leapt larger an hour before the close when Keegan Petersen, a player equal parts stickability and sizzling strokes, was removed by Ravichandran Ashwin.

Then there’s 2018, when South Africa were 124/1 in search of 241 — and lost 9/53. The sole survivors of that attack, Shami and Bumrah, shared seven wickets on, admittedly, a far more difficult pitch. So while many laughed at Bumrah’s florid antics on Wednesday, the joke may yet be on the South Africans.

It’s probably easier being Bumrah than it is being Rabada. But no doubt not by much. We could have the chance to measure the difference on Thursday. And to see a person for what they are, not as an idea, a hope, or a prayer. 

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

How Tutu made Jansen a Test player

“It’s a really sad day for South Africa.” – Lungi Ngidi

Telford Vice | Centurion

THEY were born almost 69 years apart, but both in Klerksdorp. One died on Sunday, hailed worldwide as the hero he was for his courage in the face of evil. The other became, in Centurion on the same day, the first person born this century to play Test cricket for South Africa. Desmond Tutu was 80 days into his 91st year. Marco Jansen was 21 years and 239 days old.

Without the indisputable greatness of Tutu, Jansen would never have marvelled at the pristine perfection of his deeply green, unbaggy South Africa cap, the magic of the new white shirts that had the Protea badge on the front and his name in capitals across the back, and the ridiculousness of being picked ahead of Duanne Olivier. 

Not quite. Jansen wouldn’t have known those joys without Tutu, Albert Luthuli, Lillian Ngoyi, Robert Sobukwe, Miriam Makeba, Steve Biko, Joe Slovo, Oliver Tambo, Ahmed Kathrada, Ruth First, Nelson Mandela and all the other luminaries in the pantheon who fought so long and so hard and sacrificed so much to free all South Africans from bondage mental and physical. Their triumph allowed the world to accept the country into civilisation, and thus back into the realm of international sport from which it had been jettisoned when even enslavers and colonisers could no longer look the other way. Tutu, a force of love, light and life, did more than most to drag South Africa out of darkness and thrust it, imperfect and blinking, onto a path towards democracy.

For a long time, Klerksdorp, since the 1830s a Dutch settler stronghold, then a farming hub, then a gold rush mecca, then an Anglo-Boer War battlefield and concentration camp — racially segregated, of course — and now a dry, dusty sprawl of heavy-set stone buildings brooding in wide streets and stewing in its history, would not have wanted to claim Tutu as its own. He was black, he was Anglican, and he refused to be subservient to the whiteness that was the law of the land. In places like Klerksdorp and far beyond, those were three ominous strikes. It needed remarkable fortitude over decades to keep fouling off the regime’s ever more unfair pitches, until the homerun of something like freedom was finally hammered over apartheid’s wall. 

So the black armbands hastily added to the South Africans’ sleeves when news of Tutu’s death broke shortly before the start of play were especially appropriate. Without Tutu and those like him, there would have been no armbands because there would have been no sleeves to attach them to — because international cricket would not have involved South Africa.

Jansen, who was born in May 2000, or more than six years after the shining day that heralded his country’s first legitimate elections, would have learnt about all that at school. But he would be forgiven for not thinking about any such thing from the instant he discovered that he would play. Not Olivier, who has taken 28 wickets — more than anyone else — at 11.10 in four provincial first-class matches this season? Or Sisanda Magala, who has 15 at 14.33 from two games? Or Glenton Stuurman and his 11 at 18.00 in two matches? Why wasn’t Lutho Sipamla and his 12 at 13.58 in two matches in the squad? Jansen’s numbers — 10 wickets at 12.30 in two games — put him in that ballpark. But if Olivier wasn’t going to play how did we get to Jansen? Cricbuzz asked CSA’s selection convenor, Victor Mpitsang, for the thinking behind Olivier’s omission. He saw the text message but did not reply.

So it fell to Lungi Ngidi to try and explain Jansen being preferred to Olivier: “I wouldn’t know. Everyone’s been preparing well. It was probably a senior [player] call or a management call, because everyone was looking good. We didn’t even know who was going to play. Even myself, having not played in a while, I didn’t know if I was going to get the nod. But, like Dean [Elgar] always says, we pick the best team that we think is going to give us the result. Marco got his debut and I’m very happy for him.”

It seemed Jansen was questioning his presence himself when he loped in to deliver his first effort, a dying swan of a full toss outside off stump that Mayank Agarwal easily put away through point for four. By then not only had Kagiso Rabada and Ngidi sent down four flaccid overs, but South Africa had blown a review: Rabada had brushed KL Rahul’s upper arm, not his bat or gloves. So Jansen wasn’t helped by running into a scene bereft of the requisite tension.

Two dots followed his first ball. Then came an overpitched delivery that Agarwal on-drove silkily for four. And then an offering that veered legside, which was dismissed through midwicket for another boundary. One over, a dozen runs: welcome to the top, Mr Jansen.

Only four runs came off his next three overs, partly because he didn’t venture close to the stumps or bat often enough to be hit. Then he did — too full and too straight, presenting too good an opportunity for Agarwal not to claim another four down the ground. Jansen’s next delivery was sprayed short and wide, and dismissed to the cover point fence.

Why was he playing again? An answer of sorts came immediately: Agarwal’s shoulders spun open to a ball that left him, and the resultant edge flew just above head height towards Quinton de Kock, who dived and dropped a chance he would have expected to hold. More evidence of Jansen’s quality came with consecutive deliveries in his next over, when he induced an edge from Rahul that didn’t carry and beat him outside off.

After lunch, Jansen began his second spell as he had his first — with a gimme that Agarwal muscled through extra cover for four. But, with the first delivery of the fourth over of that spell, Rahul lost his head and nearly his wicket to a rib-tickler that he sent spiralling over the cordon.

There are, thus, reasons for Jansen to look back with a measure of satisfaction on his first day as a Test player. But also reasons for him to know he could have done significantly better. Too often he followed a poor ball with another or, worse, allowed the pressure he had built to escape by sending down something that had no place at this level. 

At 21 years and 239 days old, Jansen can afford such learning experiences. He should take inspiration from Sipamla, who had a similarly underwhelming debut day exactly a year ago on the same ground against Sri Lanka. Having struggled through 14 lacklustre overs in which he took 1/68, a revitalised Sipamla claimed 3/8 in two overs the next day and finished the match with six wickets. 

Jansen could also follow the example of Rabada and Ngidi, who redeemed themselves through discipline and consistency, and by showing patience while the sun hardened a surface whose early dampness slowed the ball without offering the expected reward of seam movement. Swing was there little.

Ngidi ended only the second century opening stand scored by any of South Africa’s opponents at this ground — and just the fifth of 50 or more — by trapping Agarwal in front for 60 midway through the second session with a ball that looked to be sailing high and wide. On referral, and after a lengthy delay, Hawk-Eye said otherwise. 

“I thought it was a good shout,” Ngidi told on online press conference. “If anything, I thought it was going to be umpire’s call. But when Marais [Erasmus] kept his finger down, then it became a gamble. I thought it had kept low compared to the bounce that I was getting. Trying to convince the team was another situation. But I think ‘Quinnie’ was in [Elgar’s] ear, and he said at worst it would be umpire’s call. When it started taking so long [to reach a decision] everyone started doubting themselves and saying we might have lost a review.” 

With his next delivery, Ngidi had Cheteshwar Pujara caught at short leg by a tumbling Keegan Petersen. An hour after tea, Ngidi drew Virat Kohli into a ragged stroke wide outside off that became a catch at first slip.

Ngidi had last played any cricket in a T20 World Cup warm-up match on October 20, and his most recent first-class outing was the second Test in St Lucia in June. Before Sunday, he had bowled 553 balls in first-class cricket in 2021. Olivier had bowled 1,700 deliveries, Jansen 1,053, and Rabada 990. Perhaps Ngidi’s success on Sunday could be ascribed to freshness.

But it would have needed more than one bowler in decent form to stop India from reaching 272/3 at stumps. Rahul will continue on Monday, hoping to turn his undefeated 122 into something monumental.

If the South Africans need a diversion before play resumes, they might wonder whether Jansen is their tallest ever player. At 2.06 metres, he has 10 centimetres on Morné Morkel, no less. More morbidly, the home side could ponder why an India tour seems to coincide with a significant death. In December 2013, Mandela died on the same day as an ODI between South Africa and India at the Wanderers. In January 2018, the Wanderers Test started the day after the demise of jazz great Hugh Masekela.

And now Tutu. Klerksdorp, like the rest of the country and much of the world, is in mourning. “It’s a really sad day for South Africa,” Ngidi said. Should Jansen amount to a fraction of his fellow Klerksdorper as a human being, nevermind a mere cricketer, he will have done great things.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

How Wanderers helped make Kohli’s India

Whether South Africa have learnt their lessons from the bruising 2018 Joburg Test will be gleaned when the teams clash on the Highveld again this month.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

INDIA’S most recent Test in South Africa, at the Wanderers in January 2018, did not go gentle into that good night that falls softly when, finally, the sprinklers soak the stretch of uncovered earth that is spent and striated after serving us as many as five days of keenly contested cricket. Instead a pitch of payback for a nasty Nagpur surface during South Africa’s series in India in November 2015 dominated proceedings, and the headlines. 

Michael Holding, then more a commentator on the game than its social justice conscience, held the front page: “Two out of a hundred; it’s a shit pitch. This is not a cricket pitch, this is dangerous. Call it off. Forget it. You can’t play cricket on that. I have no idea what has gone wrong but I know it’s not a good cricket pitch.” Something’s up when a fast bowler complains about a pitch that aids and abets fast bowling.

Play was suspended late on the third day, so that umpires Ian Gould and Aleem Dar could consult match referee Andy Pycroft on what to do, after Jasprit Bumrah had nailed Dean Elgar on the helmet. It was the first time in the match a batter had taken a blow to the head, but the ninth time in not quite nine sessions that the medics had been called onto the field to deal with the results of the ball thudding into various parts — mostly the hands — of different bodies. The man who then ran the Wanderers, Greg Fredericks, the chief executive of the Gauteng Cricket Board and someone rendered unafraid by his long years spent fighting apartheid, including from inside a jail cell, paid a cautious visit to the pressbox to gauge the media mood. 

More than three hours later, the ICC explained: “The on-field umpires will continue to monitor the pitch, and consult the match referee should the pitch deteriorate further. The welfare of the players is paramount and two of the most experienced match officials are in charge of the game and will take appropriate decisions.” Play resumed on the fourth morning, after a delay while the maligned groundstaff dealt with a wet outfield. Parthiv Patel’s broken finger — he was replaced by Dinesh Karthik — was the closest we came to serious injury. Life went on.

Less often recalled than all that is the result and its context. India won, by 63 runs with a day and a bit to spare, on the most un-Asian pitch imaginable. Asked to meet a challenge the South Africans had calculated was beyond them, they did. And more: that was India’s first success outside Asia and the similar surfaces of the Caribbean since July 2014, when they won at Lord’s. Before that they went 14 Tests outside of their comfort zone without winning, 10 of them lost. That lean run started after they were victorious at Kingsmead in December 2010. But the Wanderers win marked the start of a happier part of the journey for Virat Kohli’s team. They have since played 20 Tests in England, Australia and New Zealand, winning seven and drawing three. Was the relative allround sledgehammer India have become, regardless of conditions, forged in the molten heat of four days in Joburg in January 2018?

The way Kohli saluted the end of the game and the series, by taking a deeply cynical bow, a veritable physical sneer, a bombastic cameo, offered strong evidence in favour of that argument. India’s captain, as tall a totem as any team have ever had, was viscerally angry, and just as clearly incandescent with pride, and as close to the edge of the cliff of unacceptable behaviour as even he could dare to go, and also defiant in the face of the arrogance of opponents who thought they could dictate terms in their own backyard. He was magnificent.           

Whether South Africa have learnt their lessons from that bruising, in every sense, match will be gleaned when the teams clash on the Highveld again later this month. They were to have resumed hostilities where they left off, but practicality has trumped poetry and the series will start in Centurion on December 26 before returning to the scene of 2018’s passion on January 3 and moving to Newlands on January 11.

Of South Africa’s XI at the Wanderers almost four years ago, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Faf du Plessis, Vernon Philander and Morné Morkel have retired. That’s damn near half a damn fine team. India will return with four of their five stars from that gnarly encounter: Cheteshwar Pujara and Kohli, who scored a gritty half-century each, and Bumrah and Mohammed Shami, who claimed five-wicket hauls. Shami’s 5/28 in the second innings — centred on a 10-ball burst of naked aggression that earned him three wickets for a single run — was a thing of shimmering beauty, the equal of the best fast bowling yet seen in a country not short of quality quick stuff.

The missing piece of the puzzle is Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who gutsed out 125 balls at the batting crease, was last out and ninth out for his 63 runs, took four wickets and limited the damage to 2.24 an over, and was named the player of what has turned out to be the last Test in which he has appeared.

And so that good night came and the sprinklers soaked the now cursed uncovered earth that was spent and striated after a contest that veered beyond keen into dangerous territory. It is one of the secret pleasures of cricket writers to be there when that happens, to see the pitch and the outfield take their rest and reward in respectful silence and splendid isolation unsullied by trespassers like spectators, players and umpires. As the water flows onto the ground below, so the ideas and the words they generate flow into keyboards, and from there into the ether itself, in the pressbox above. Everything about the scene changes. Coolth wafts over, the sun bids a spectacular adieu, the light fades to velvet, insects spike the sky. There is magic.

Covid has taken that from us: we will have to be out of the ground an hour after play ends. But we will, like all who see it, take the cricket with us. It is ours to keep.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

What the Faf was that?

“I really don’t have any answers for you.” – Anrich Nortjé on South Africa’s bowling tactics.

TELFORD VICE at The Wanderers

FULL and straight, you idiot. Where’ve we heard that before? Where haven’t we heard it before, more like. We heard it again at the Wanderers on Saturday, and far stronger language than “idiot” was used as the full extent of South Africa’s folly was exposed to an increasingly disgruntled crowd on a beer-drenched afternoon in the sun.

When Jos Buttler hoiked Vernon Philander high into the covers and Dean Elgar kept his nerve and his eye on the ball to take a fine running catch over his shoulder, a bothersome stand of 40 was ended. Having reduced England to 309/8 South Africa had a decent chance of getting out of there alive, or at least for around the 319 that’s the average first innings total at this ground. Two proper doses of full and straight, and they should been batting.

Instead, the innings endured for another 81 deliveries — precious few among them anything like full and straight — that cost 91 runs. England went from being in danger of dismissal for a below average total to posting the 13th highest score in the 81 first innings at the Wanderers. The stand of 82 that Mark Wood shared with Stuart Board is the biggest yet seen in the 41 Tests played here. England’s Nos. 9, 10 and jack hammered 24 runs in fours and another 42 in sixes — or 72.53% of the aggregate for the last two partnerships.

They were able to do so, in part, because Woakes, Wood and Broad have between them scored two centuries and 17 half-centuries in Tests, in which they have a combined average of a touch more than 20. They are nobody’s idea of walking wickets.

But they are a long way from how good South Africa’s tactics made them look. The approach appeared to be to bowl short and wide. And to spread the field in hopes of a catch. What the Faf? That the buck stops with Faf du Plessis is undeniable, and as it should be, but closer to the truth is that the bowling plan for the match is devised by the bowlers themselves along with Charl Langeveldt. That said, it’s up to Du Plessis to realise when plan A isn’t working, and if he couldn’t do that on Saturday it’s fair to ask whether he has lost his bearings as a captain. In Du Plessis defence, only half the plan wasn’t working. Philander bowled 13 of those last 81 deliveries and conceded a solitary single, and Anrich Nortjé sent down 24 balls and begrudged three runs. But Dane Paterson went for 39 off 26 and Beuran Hendricks bled 34 off 18.

How aren’t the sorrier parts of that equation signals for Du Plessis to tell Dwaine Pretorius — who bowled at least nine fewer overs in the innings than anyone else — to warm up? Or to get Elgar to bowl some of the slow left-arm filth that has somehow claimed the wickets Steve Smith, Cheteshwar Pujara, Shikhar Dhawan, Alex Hales, Misbah-ul-Haq and Mayank Agarwal? Or even to unleash Temba Bavuma, who would have become the 21st man to take a wicket — that of Usman Khawaja at the WACA in November 2016 — with his first delivery in Test cricket had he not fetched from somewhere a delivery stride longer than he is tall and overstepped? Better yet, why wasn’t the field more attacking? Or at least less defensive — at a stage there was only two men, besides the bowler and the wicketkeeper, not on the boundary. Even better, why didn’t Du Plessis or Langeveldt or anyone demand a steady stream of full and straight? The lack of ideas and leadership was shocking, and damning evidence of how far this team have crashed in the 26 days since they won in Centurion. Yes, they actually won. 

Nortjé finished with 5/110 on Saturday, his first five-wicket haul in his sixth Test. With the illogicality of how these things are mismanaged, it fell to him to come and explain to the press where it all went wrong. After a few unconvincing attempts, he came up with the bitter truth: “I really don’t have any answers for you. It’s not nice sitting here and having our tails down. I would have loved for us to be in a dominant position when it happened.”

There wasn’t time or opportunity enough to find proper answers once South Africa’s slide towards a significant first innings deficit started. It was a story of submission for the most part, but the mood lifted incongruously after Du Plessis’ luck deserted him completely and he was sent packing by Rod Tucker despite Woakes hitting him on the flap of his front pad as he rose onto his toes to try to work a delivery to leg. Unsurprisingly, Du Plessis referred. Even less surprisingly, the gizmo said the ball would have kissed the apex of the bails just hard enough for the umpire’s call to stay in England’s favour.

With that South Africa slumped to 60/4. But you would never have guessed from the clamour that rose from a section of the spectators in the Unity Stand at the Corlett Drive End. That’s where the Gwijo Squad, the all-dancing, all-singing, almost all-black but enthusiastically all-inclusive group of South Africa supporters who sprang to prominence during the Springboks’ march to triumph at last year’s rugby World Cup, were stationed. Long before anyone could see Bavuma, the Squad heralded his imminent presence: “Temba! Temba! Temba!” He faced his first delivery of the series with five slips bristling behind his back, and a roar ripped in all directions as he deftly dabbed that ball through cover point for three. “In Temba We Trust” read a banner, and soon a song in isiZulu was rippling round the ground. “This is Temba. If you didn’t know him before, now you see him,” the refrain went. But the bubble of happiness burst less than eight overs later when Bavuma failed to get on top of a short delivery from Wood and Ben Stokes held a sharp, low catch at second slip.

At least, the bubble of happiness should have burst. But the Gwijo Squad were having none of it and kept singing and dancing throughout the remaining 25 balls of the day’s play, one of which claimed Nortjé’s wicket. The party continued as they left the stands and wound their way round the concourse, apparently uncaring that South Africa will resume 312 behind on Sunday and with Quinton de Kock their last hope of significantly closing the gap. When you’re all out of reality, unreality will have to do.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Rabada’s back, but India batters won’t go away

“I look for the special spells when the circumstances are tough, and he bowled very well.” – Vincent Barnes on Kagiso Rabada’s improvement.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

KAGISO Rabada bowled, Cheteshwar Pujara edged, and Faf du Plessis took the catch low and to his left at first slip.

It was a common enough occurrence: 124 of Rabada’s 180 Test wickets have been earned by catches, most of them in the arc behind the wicket, 14 by Du Plessis.

But, as South Africa’s captain lay on the turf in Pune on Thursday, he stared at the ball in his hands as he as if he had never seen it.

First he screamed at the thing in celebration. Or was it relief?

Then he smiled at it blithely, as if it was an old friend too many times removed but now happily returned.

Then he stared at it some more, and seemed reluctant to hand it over so the game could continue. 

Perhaps Du Plessis had forgotten what the ball looked like.

Almost four hours passed between Rabada producing an away swinger that found the edge of Rohit Sharma’s bat and was caught by Quinton de Kock, and Pujara’s wicket.

Another hour drained away before Rabada extracted a touch of extra bounce to surprise Mayank Agarwal, whose rocketing edge might have gone clean through Du Plessis’ wishbone had he not taken the catch.

Near on five hours of hard work for three wickets is no-one’s idea of an easy time, but that was as good as it got for South Africa on the first day of the second men’s Test — which ended 4.5 overs early because of bad light with India having reached 273/3.

Maybe Du Plessis was still wondering why his luck seems to have deserted him at the toss on foreign fields.

The coin has come down the wrong way for him in his last six away Tests in charge, and for all seven games — across the formats — he has led his team in Asia.

That must be part of the reason for the more alarming statistic that South Africa have lost 10 of the 19 away Tests they have played in the past four years.

In the four years before that they played 21 on the road and won 10; a clear illustration of their reversal of fortunes in all senses.  

On Thursday, as India did in the first Test in Visakhapatnam, they made Virat Kohli’s continued success at the toss count.

At least, they did after Sharma’s removal in the first hour, when the ball did plenty on a decent pitch.

“If you looked at the conditions this morning, the window was a lot longer for fast bowlers than in Vizag,” bowling coach Vincent Barnes told reporters in Pune. “With a bit more luck we could have had a few more wickets.”

As the day wore on the ball went to sleep on a surface that might as well have been covered by a fluffy duvet, and that helped Agarwal and Pujara take their partnership to 138.

Rabada was easily South Africa’s most threatening bowler on his best day in action for more than a year — he has gone 20 Test innings without taking five wickets — and took 3/48 in 18.1 overs.

“I look for the special spells when the circumstances are tough, and he bowled very well,” Barnes said. “There were a lot of signs that he’s getting to the top.”

So why Du Plessis waited 23 overs before bringing Rabada back after lunch wasn’t completely answered by the fact that he had bowled spells of six and four overs in the morning session.

Ten overs after Pujara went Agarwal was on his way, but with another century to his record.

He followed his 215 in Vizag with 108, a classy performance from a player who had earned an unwanted reputation for not making the most of his starts.

How had he improved his discipline?

Partly, Mayank told a television interviewer, through “a lot of long distance running and meditation”.

The South Africans have spent most of their time on the field in this series doing something similar, though not out of choice.

And they would seem to be in for more of the same on Friday, what with Kohli 63 not out and Ajinkya Rahane looking set having faced 70 balls for his unbeaten 18.

First published by TMG Digital.

SA face the poppadom test

“The last time we came here the wickets were a lot worse — you can still bat on this one.” – Vernon Philander.

TELFORD VICE in Cape Town

WINNING is no longer a serious option for South Africa in Visakhapatnam, and their chances of saving the first men’s test against India are as slim and brittle as a poppadom.

The outlook wasn’t quite as bleak as that until halfway through what became the sixth over before stumps on Saturday, when Ravindra Jadeja came around the wicket and snuck a delivery under Dean Elgar’s bat and onto his pad.

Replays said the ball pitched on leg stump, and the rest was a formality of television umpiring.

Elgar’s streetfighting 160 in the first innings was why South Africa passed 400 for only the third time in their nine tests in which they have batted second in India.

In building his monument to hardegatheid, Welkom’s finest faced, alone, more than half the number of deliveries his 10 teammates managed combined.

The danger of what Elgar might do the second time around was the reason Virat Kohli batted on and on, only declaring when the target was 395: beyond anything any side have successfully chased in India.

South Africa were 384 runs away from what remains an impossible victory when bad light ended play four overs early, and the most important stat on Sunday is the 50% forecast for rain.

What are the chances of anything except an India win?

“The last time we came here the wickets were a lot worse — you can still bat on this one,” Vernon Philander told reporters after the close, a reference to the wretched surfaces prepared in 2015, and which Elgar described on Friday as “a farce”.

Still, closer to the truth though this surface is, it’s still a fifth-day pitch in India.

With Elgar removed from the equation, South Africa might be close to losing by the time you read this. Or worse.

How did we get here?

On the blazing bat of Rohit Sharma, who shared a stand of 169 with Cheteshwar Pujara and became the only man in all 2 363 tests yet played to score centuries in both innings opening the batting for the first time.

Sharma’s 127 followed the 176 he made in the first innings, and the 13 sixes he smote is more than anyone else has hit in a single test.

Neither has any team launched more sixes in a match than India’s 36 in this game.

Keshav Maharaj, Dane Piedt and Senuran Muthusamy won’t need reminding of those frightening facts.

“If you’re a South African spinner you need someone to erase this from your brain,” Graeme Smith said on commentary as another mighty blow sent the ball sailing through the evening sky like a dark comet.

Maharaj, a slight figure at the best of times, was reduced to a gauntly skeletal shadow after adding 29 overs to the 55 — a South Africa record for a test innings — in the first dig. A match bag of 5/318 is not nearly a fair reward for that much hard work.

Maharaj’s nadir came when Ajinkya Rahane, having swept him for four conventionally, didn’t bother turning his bat when reverse-sweeping his next delivery. The ball scooted to the boundary off the pitched spine of the back of Rahane’s bat just as surely regardless.  

But at least Maharaj looked threatening. Not so Piedt, who went wicketless for 102 after taking 1/107 in the first innings and suffered the dignity of Sharma heaving a hattrick of sixes off his bowling.

Muthusamy made a decent enough debut, not least because he used up 106 balls to score his unbeaten 33.

More of that kind of batting on Sunday could give him the chance to be a hero. How much more? That’s like deciding how many poppadoms is enough.

First published by the Sunday Times.

Steyn takes five, proves fitness

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Lisbon

DALE Steyn’s 5/66 for Hampshire in Yorkshire’s first innings in a county championship match in Southampton has grabbed its deserved share of headlines.

Steyn started his haul in his third over by clean bowling Cheteshwar Pujara with a superb delivery that pitched on middle and straightened viciously to uproot the India star’s off and middle stumps.

Pujara also fell to Steyn, for a fourth-ball duck, in the one-day semi-final in Southampton last Monday. 

But the more important fact, for South Africans, was that Steyn came through 29 overs in the first innings of the championship match and bowled another 21 in the second dig.

His economy rates — 2.27 and 2.23 — offered further evidence that he is getting back to his best ahead of South Africa’s Test series in Sri Lanka next month. 

Steyn, who needs three more wickets to surpass Shaun Pollock as South Africa’s leading Test bowler, has spent much of the past 18 months sidelined by shoulder and heel injuries.

There’s more good news for Saffers keeping an eye on Steyn from afar in that he will be rested for Hampshire’s match against Lancashire at Old Trafford, which started on Monday.

But only to keep him fresh for the one-day final against Kent at Lord’s on Saturday.