Proper strokes, proper cricket, proper records

“When we walked off the field ‘KG’ said they’re 10 runs short.” – Reeza Hendricks

Telford Vice / Cape Town

ALONG with the bowling, Johnson Charles and Quinton de Kock rubbished one of cricket’s oldest chestnuts in Centurion on Sunday. Trust me, you’ve heard this before: the first-class game is the bedrock on which all good and true things must be built. Deviate from that dictum and you are doomed to disappointment.

The logic is that no cricketer, particularly those who bat for a living, can hope to succeed unless they have mastered the skills demanded in matches scheduled for at least three consecutive days.

Charles played all manner of strokes in his 46-ball 118. His third century in the format but his first at international level flew off 39 balls, the fastest by a West Indian and joint second-fastest in T20I history. Had Johnson got there in five fewer deliveries he would have broken the world record.

Many of the shots he played didn’t strain the envelope of the emphatic as much as rip it up. Most were also ripped in another way: from the pages of what the fogeys regard as the copyrighted first-class playbook. De Kock’s 44-ball 100, his first century for South Africa in the format and his sixth in T20s, also shimmered with audacity and orthodoxy in equal measure. It was also his first century for South Africa in the format and his sixth in T20s. He broke his own record for South Africa’s fastest 50 by getting there in 15 deliveries.

Charles and De Kock reeled off what would have seemed, to the hapless few fated to have to bowl to them, a series of punchlines without jokes. Here’s another — Charles last played any first-class cricket in December 2016 and De Kock in February 2018, not counting Tests.

Charles has yet to earn a Test cap, which is not surprising considering he has a first-class average of 20.79 with one century and three 50s after 65 innings. De Kock played his 54th and final Test in December 2021. He retired with six hundreds and 22 half-centuries from 91 trips to the crease.

For all the pyrotechnics of the 10 fours and 11 sixes that lit Charles’ innings, the stroke that will stick in the memory was his most exquisitely delicate: he shimmied far outside off to Marco Jansen in the 14th, aimed little more than a top edge at the ball, and deflected it deftly through fine leg for four.

De Kock’s finest shot was a crisp, contained punch down the ground for four off Sheldon Cottrell. It was one of nine boundaries he hit to go with his eight sixes, and it was unveiled with only the eighth ball he faced.       

Charles isn’t a Test or even a noted first-class player and De Kock has made clear his preference for pyjamas over whites. And yet they essayed their innings in the grand and ancient manner, only with more elegance and excellence than has in the past been enough to hail performances as exceptional. In the space of one Sunday afternoon Charles and De Kock took batting in any kind of cricket to a level it has rarely been, if ever. Where does all that leave the fogeys?

“Cricket shots will always be cricket shots, because we’re playing cricket,” Charles told a press conference. “It’s not as if you could play a football shot in a cricket match. Guys are constantly evolving and learning how to go forward. It’s a beautiful sight. I’d love to see the game 10 years from now.”

Charles has played 40 T20Is but he featured in none from September 2016 to October last year. That was in the wake of reaching 50 just twice in his previous 20 innings. His explanation for how he ended his six-year absence from the side offered further evidence that success in the format is about playing properly: “I’ve changed my game in that I’ve gone back to the basics, made sure that I’ve got that on the down low. It’s worked for me. If I continue to do that I’ll continue having great innings.”

He did acknowledge that “with such a good pitch and on a small field you don’t have to over-hit the ball”, but staving off the urge to do so takes discipline. Kyle Mayers and Charles delivered a masterclass in exactly that in their 58-ball stand of 135. Reeza Hendricks and De Kock followed their lead and shared 152 off 65.

On another day Hendricks’ 68 off 28 — a strike rate of 242.85 — would have won the match. On Sunday this comparatively understated performance all but flew under the radar. Aiden Markram referenced Hendricks’ batting in his television interview: “You talk about playing attacking cricket but that doesn’t mean you have to slog everything.”  Also on television, De Kock had praise for his partner: “He was quite the silent assassin. We said to each other after he got out [in the 13th], ‘Jeez, we’ve done something special’.”

In his presser, Hendricks — cramp kept De Kock in the dressing room — fought his own corner: “T20 allows for normal cricket shots. It’s still your normal strokeplay. You don’t have to go out there and swing from the hips from ball one. T20 still allows for good cricket. Everyone who contributed today played really good cricket shots.”

And they realised 517 runs, the highest aggregate in the 2,032 men’s T20Is yet played. Only six first innings have surpassed West Indies’ 258/5. No reply has been bigger than South Africa’s 259/4, reached with seven balls to spare. No team have hit more sixes in an innings than the Windies’ 22. No match at this level has delivered more sixes than Sunday’s 35, nor more fours than its 46. Never has a greater chunk of the runs in a T20I been hit in fours and sixes: 76.21%.

“When we walked off the field [after West Indies’ innings] ‘KG’ said they’re 10 runs short,” Hendricks said. That drew parallels with Jacques Kallis’ comment during the innings break in a famous ODI at the Wanderers in June 2006, when Australia put up a then world record total of 434/4: “The bowlers have done their job. It’s up to the batters now.” South Africa replied with 438/9 with a ball remaining. Now the T20I version of South Africa’s team have their own magical number to celebrate. “I would say it’s equivalent to the 438 game, so to be part of it is a big deal,” Hendricks said.

Rovman Powell described the afternoon’s events as “pretty, pretty crazy”, and the madness was still swirling in the smoke thrown by the post-match fireworks when Bob Marley’s voice rang out over the ground: “Every little thing is going to be alright.” A member of the groundstaff danced in time to the music as he collected the circular white markers denoting the 30-metre circle on the outfield. He looked happy with what his and his colleagues’ efforts had produced, and so he should have. Everything was indeed alright.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Redemption song duet for SA, WI

“We’re here to win the World Cup, otherwise why would we be here?” – Kagiso Rabada

Telford Vice | Cape Town

FEW would have expected batters to dominate in the T20 World Cup, given the pitches in the UAE and Oman. But even fewer would have expected South Africa and West Indies to be utterly dominated at the crease in their opening matches. So the two line-ups will hope to sing a redemption song when they clash in Dubai on Tuesday. 

Australia’s attack bristled with quality on Saturday, but not enough to justify limiting South Africa to 118/9. Similarly, while England’s bowlers pack a sizeable collective punch, they wouldn’t have expected to dismiss the West Indians for 55 in 14.2 overs. Batting conditions weren’t straightforward, as evidenced by Australia needing all but two deliveries of their 20 overs to reach the target.

But Bangladesh’s 171/4 in Sharjah on Sunday looked good until Sri Lanka replied with 172/5, and no-one would have predicted Pakistan’s 10-wicket triumph in Dubai on Sunday immediately after India had posted 151/7.

So while the sluggish surfaces are clearly challenging batters, and will continue to be so throughout the tournament, the only option is for them to meet that challenge. Or at least to do so better than South Africa and West Indies managed on Saturday. Wheeled out, unfairly, on Monday to explain all that, Kagiso Rabada had a hearty laugh when it was pointed out to him that his team’s batters had at least performed better than the Windies’: South Africa’s total was more than double that of their next opponents’. Rabada deserved a chuckle — his 19 not out batting at No. 9 was his team’s second-highest score.

That West Indies’ major suffering against England was inflicted by spin will no doubt inform South Africa’s approach. In a combined 6.2 overs, Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid took 6/19 — usually when their victims were looking to attack recklessly strokes. It would not be stretching a point to posit that Tabraiz Shamsi and Keshav Maharaj are easily as good, if not better, than the English slow poisoners.

Unpacking the South Africans’ fragility at the crease is more complex. They shambled into the sunset thanks to a strange mix of freakishness — Quinton de Kock was bowled by a delivery that bounced high above him after he had edged it into the ground — fine bowling — Josh Hazlewood’s away-swinger that had Rassie van der Dussen caught behind was a thing of beauty — comedy — Keshav Maharaj fell over and was run out as a consequence of neglecting to wear full spikes — and questionable strokes — Heinrich Klaasen closed the face of his bat and blooped a leading edge to backward point. Consequently, the Windies would be forgiven for thinking the South Africans could help them get the job done.

South Africa’s bowlers will be confident of building on Saturday’s performance, which was well supported by their fielders. While the West Indian bowlers and fielders didn’t have a fair chance to measure themselves having been given so few runs to defend, they would have taken heart from removing four of England’s top five inside seven overs and with only 39 runs scored.

All involved in Tuesday’s game will know Bob Marley’s stirring 1980 anthem for justice and freedom, “Redemption Song”, and they could do worse than take to heart its central message: “Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our minds.” Batting is a mind game at the best of times, even more so on pitches that ask tough questions. Finding the answers won’t be easy, but there’s more than enough talent, skill, experience and belief in both teams to pass the impending examination.    

When: South Africa vs West Indies, Super 12 Group 1, 14:00 Local, 12:00 SAST

Where: Dubai International Stadium

What to expect: What do you say about conditions when you’re dealing with teams who succumbed to the lowest totals of the first four matches of the second round? Maybe that they can only improve, or at least get closer to the 150 which would seem to be the par score in this tournament.   

T20I Head to Head: South Africa 9-6 West Indies (2-1 in World T20 games)

Team Watch:

South Africa

Injury/Availability Concerns: None of consequence. Given the amount of strapping on his hand on Saturday, Temba Bavuma looked like he was heading into the boxing ring. But the thumb he broke in Sri Lanka in September seems to have mended well. The tight groin that took Tabraiz Shamsi out of the warm-up game against Pakistan last Wednesday wasn’t a factor on Saturday, when he bowled all four of his overs.  

Tactics & Matchups: Quinton de Kock’s aggregate of 255 in the five-match series between the teams in Grenada in June and July was easily the highest: no-one else reached 180. But, having reeled off three half-centuries — two of them unbeaten — in four innings for South Africa and Mumbai Indians in September, he has since failed to reach 30 in his last six T20 innings. His team need him to come good on Tuesday. Thing is, he averages 14.25 facing Dwayne Bravo and 28.20 against Andre Russell in this format.  

Probable XI: Temba Bavuma (c), Quinton de Kock (wk), Rassie van der Dussen, Aiden Markram, Reeza Hendricks, David Miller, Wiaan Mulder, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Anrich Nortjé, Tabraiz Shamsi  

West Indies

Injury/Availability Concerns: Happily, fitness issues are not among the Windies’ problems. But they are no doubt still trying to cover the bases left uncovered by Fabian Allen’s withdrawal with an ankle injury last Wednesday. That said, Akeal Hosein proved himself a capable replacement on Saturday. 

Tactics & Matchups: That Chris Gayle is capable of wreaking havoc is hardly a secret. It’s also clear that, at 42, he is in decline: he has scored only one half-century in his last 27 T20I innings, and it’s been more than five years since he made the second of his two centuries at this level. But the good news, for the West Indians, is that he is unusually effective against South Africa than any other opponents — his strike rate of 177.94 in T20Is against them is higher than when he is facing any other country’s bowlers.  

Probable XI: Lendl Simmons, Evin Lewis, Chris Gayle, Roston Chase, Dwayne Bravo, Nicholas Pooran (wk), Kieron Pollard (c), Andre Russell, Akeal Hosein, Obed McCoy, Ravi Rampaul

Did you know? 

Reeza Hendricks needs seven more runs to become the seventh South Africa player to reach 1,000 runs in T20Is. Roston Chase’s claims for selection are only strengthened by the fact that he had a batting strike rate of 144.33 and a bowling economy rate of 6.92 in this year’s CPL.

What they said: 

“We need to rock up with proper intensity and play close to our best. That’s what we’re here to do. We’re here to win the World Cup, otherwise why would we be here?” — Kagiso Rabada

“Chris [Gayle] has been a wonderful servant for West Indies cricket. We still expect great things from him, but he also does a lot in terms of addressing the room and helping the younger players. Sometimes we tend to just look at performances, and we tend to think that the numbers don’t match up.” — Roddy Estwick

First published by Cricbuzz. 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.