The mystery of South Africa’s vanished overseas pros

“When pros come and play for provincial teams you can see the influence they have and how they pass on their experience. It’s a great recipe for cricket development.” – Andrew Hudson

Telford Vice / Cape Town

WHAT would Malcolm do? Cricket people in KwaZulu-Natal still ask the question of themselves and each other even though Malcom Marshall played his last game for their team more than 28 years ago. The impact the West Indies great has outlived even him: he died, of colon cancer, in Bridgetown in November 1999; seven months after his 41st birthday.

Marshall’s memory has lasted longer than what he came to do in South Africa. Overseas professionals have disappeared from the highest level of the domestic game in the country, a consequence of changing economic and political realities. With the pros has gone a wealth of experience and positive influence.

Provincial cricket, already systematically weakened by being denied the services of the best players it produces from its own talent pool once those players become established at international level, is all the poorer for the foreigners’ removal from the equation.

Errol Stewart had the privilege of keeping to Marshall and being captained by him in some of the 76 first-class and list A matches the West Indian played in South Africa from October 1992 to March 1996. “He was a consummate professional,” Stewart told Cricbuzz. “It was a continual striving to win, to try and get better all the time. He didn’t accept mediocrity.”

Marshall captained the Durban-based team in 17 first-class matches, of which they won nine and lost only two. They were unbeaten under his leadership in 1994/95, when they claimed any version of the title in the format — black, white or unified — for the first time in 14 seasons. The Marshall plan had lasting effects: they were champions again in 1996/97, the summer after he left.

It wasn’t all about the big picture. “There were two guys in my career who I kept to who knew what they were doing with the ball,” Stewart said. “One was Shaun Pollock and the other was Malcolm Marshall. If they bowled a ball down the leg side I’d give them the teapot because they almost never used to do that.

“Macco would bowl into the wind, and the north-easterly can pump at Kingsmead. He wouldn’t look for the easy option despite being 36 or 37. He felt his skills were good enough to swing it either way, and the wind assisted him with that, and he wanted to maximise the pace of Pollock, [Lance] Klusener and [Ross] Veenstra.”

But the fire that earned Marshall 376 wickets at 20.94 in 81 Tests, the last of them more than a year before he turned up at Kingsmead, burned still. Stewart recalled him having the pace and the gumption to bounce Adrian Kuiper, a renowned puller and hooker: “It hit Kuiper on the head and went for six.”

Even so, it was as a mentor that Marshall left his most indelible mark. “I didn’t keep all the time, and I remember taking three catches at short leg when Lance Klusener took seven wickets,” Stewart said. “Macco’s attitude to Lance, who until he arrived bowled line and length and tried to swing it, was for him to whack it in. ‘No drives, man! No drives!’ That’s when Lance became a shock bowler.”

Between the 1999 World Cup and an ODI quadrangular in Kenya, Stewart said, “Zulu came down to the nets one day and bowled for three hours without stopping. The first hour he bowled with a brand new ball, the second hour with a ball that was about 40 or 50 overs old, and the final hour with something that was like a piece of soap. I ascribe that to the work ethic Malcolm Marshall would have instilled.”

That blueprint went beyond what happened on the field: “When I started I would practise my batting in running shoes. Macco arrived and said you’ve got to prepare the way you’re going to play. Everybody started batting in their spikes, and replicating what they were going to do in the game. You can’t underestimate that kind of stuff.

“He was fiercely competitive, but off the field he enjoyed a beer and some rum and he was very happy to impart his knowledge to younger players. I learnt a lot sitting in the dressingroom after the day’s play and listening to his stories. He was very generous with his time and his information.”

And he might never have come to Durban: “He was going to go to Transvaal. Eddie Barlow was the coach there and he said, ‘He’s finished. I don’t want him.’ In our first [first-class] match we played with Macco against Transvaal, at the Wanderers, he took a five-for [6/45]. I remember the delivery he bowled to James Teeger. He came around the wicket, and the ball pitched around leg stump, swung beautifully and clipped the top of off. Dennis Carlstein, our manager, was a former Transvaal manager and his big game was to beat them. He told Malcolm that if he got a five-for against Transvaal he would buy him a gold chain. And he did. Thank goodness Eddie Barlow said he was washed up.”

Batters also benefitted from Marshall’s South Africa stint. “He was a breath of fresh air, the nicest guy,” Andrew Hudson said. “And he was interested in developing youngsters. He could perform when he needed to but was very accommodating and always teaching guys the tricks of the trade. Lance and Shaun developed massively with Malcolm. When pros come and play for provincial teams you can see the influence they have and how they pass on their experience. It’s a great recipe for cricket development.”

Desmond Haynes’ memory shines as brightly at Western Province, for whom he played 47 first-class and list A matches from October 1994 to March 1997. Haynes was signed by Arthur Turner, who was chief executive of the WP Cricket Association from 1993 to 2004 and has since become a player agent. “Arthur still talks about the fantastic impact Desmond Haynes had, and the influence he had on the careers of guys like Herschelle Gibbs, HD Ackerman and Jacques Kallis,” Francois Brink, Turner’s agency partner, said.

Other overseas professionals had come during the apartheid era, often after going home in disgrace for being part of rebel tours to South Africa. They included, among others, Australians Kim Hughes and Carl Rackemann, and West Indians Alvin Kallicharran, Sylvester Clarke, Collis King, Eldine Baptiste, Hartley Alleyne, Franklyn Stephenson and Emmerson Trotman.

“Their contribution was invaluable,” Klusener said. “Don’t forget that when we grew up we couldn’t play international cricket. So we had these stars, who had performed everywhere on the planet, coming to help us win games. As much as Malcolm delivered for us here, Desmond did the same for Western Province. They brought a hands-on way to grow.”

The Caribbeans also brought the inconvenient truth of black excellence to a society that had subjugated the massive black majority of its population. Now succeeding generations of their players are being denied those opportunities, partly because of efforts to correct apartheid’s evil.

When Marshall came to Durban, one US dollar would buy between two and three South African rand. Currently a dollar fetches between 18 and 19 rand. South Africa’s provincial unions are on financial life support provided by CSA, which is itself far from economically sound. There is no money to spend on overseas professionals in most provinces. On top of that, the global cricket industry has changed — T20 leagues offer players exponentially higher earnings for an exponentially lower workload than they would have in a full season for a province.

“Guys are saving themselves for the leagues,” Stewart said. “They don’t want to come out here and run in hard and put their bodies under pressure for months. And there’s no point bringing an up-and-coming overseas player because we want to develop our own cricketers. The money generated goes towards looking after them, and rightly so.”

CSA’s transformation policies are perceived as another obstacle, because the overseas pro would take one of the maximum of five places in provincial XIs that can be given to white players. “Even if you get a player from West Indies, India or Pakistan, it won’t take up one of the other six places,” Brink, the player agent, said. “The problem for CSA is whether you allow provinces to do that, or whether the transformation policies are the higher cause. The bigger cause is still to give more players opportunities. As a result you sacrifice the overseas player, and that’s why the appetite for them is no longer there.

“Wouldn’t it be better to make it five players of colour and have the sixth as an overseas player? Instead of giving the guys you’re trying to bring through six spots, wouldn’t they learn more if you have a recently retired international player — someone like Alastair Cook — sharing his experience and passing on his knowledge? When I speak to agents in England, they say there are lots of their players who would be keen to come to South Africa. It’s not a lack of willingness from that side. It’s more about what we want to achieve in South Africa.”

For Klusener, now a coach, balancing the transformation numbers is less important than what the return of overseas professionals could achieve: “We need to look beyond that. The value that these guys bring and the growth for players of colour, and everybody, would be worth so much more than missing out on one spot.”

For Stewart, now a banker, lack of funding was the bigger issue: “Let’s say Ben Stokes was going to come. You’d be very happy because he would impart enormous value. But you just don’t have the money washing around. In the past you would have corporate support to sponsor players or maybe provide cars and accommodation. They’re not involved anymore.”

Imagine how much players of the stature of Marshall, Haynes, Cook and Stokes would mean to a domestic first-class system that has been graced by Kagiso Rabada in just two matches in the past nine years. What could giants like Malcolm, Desmond, Alastair and Ben do?

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

One more tantrum, without feeling, by relics of CSA’s gladly gone age

“We can’t go back to what we had. It doesn’t treat the game well.” – Dean Elgar on the suits’ old order.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

CSA’s members council, which has proved itself a perennial impediment to the sound running of the game in South Africa, has been swept aside. True to its troubled history, it first tried to go out with a recalcitrant bang. In the end, all it could manage was a whimper of acquiescence.

Rihan Richards and Donovan May, relics of the council that caused a lot of the trouble, have hung on as CSA’s president and vice-president. But those titles are likely worth little more, in power terms, than the letterheads printed with their holders’ names — except as reminders of the suits’ inglorious past. Pertinently, their new roles do not put them on the board.

Across the equator and far away in St Lucia, Dean Elgar approved. “I hope there’s going to be a new dawn and a new era,” he told an online press conference on Thursday. “We can’t go back to what we had. It doesn’t treat the game well.

“When you are instated as a captain, whether you like it or not you’re always going to be involved with those kind of chats on the boardroom front. I’m not a boardroom specialist. I’m not a politician. I’m a cricket player and the Proteas captain, and that’s all I care about. “I’d like to say that I trust the new structure going forward. Cricket needs to be put first again. It was taking very much of a bad back seat in the past. Hopefully the new structure and the new board can get cricket back up and running where it should be.”

The board will in future be headed by its chair, who has yet to be named and cannot be Richards or May or any of the non-independent members. That’s part of the seismic shift that has changed the shape of high level cricket administration in South Africa.      

The members council, which is comprised of the presidents of the 14 provinces and associates, agreed in August 2012 that CSA should be served by a majority independent board. It took until CSA’s annual meeting on Saturday — its first in 20 months — for the council to fulfil that commitment. Little wonder: previously, most of the seats on the board were reserved for council members.

Consequently cricket has suffered years of financial failings and governance scandals, which in November sparked government intervention that threatened the suspension of the country’s teams from international competition and the withdrawal of state funding unless CSA’s house was put in order. That prompted the resignation of the dysfunctional elected board, and the establishment of an interim structure. The interim board dragged the council, kicking and screaming all the way, and with sports minister Nathi Mthethwa looking on sternly, to Saturday’s meeting.

But the council had one last tantrum to throw. Despite having no authority to do so, it objected to the appointment of Norman Arendse — a former CSA president and lead independent director — as one of the eight independent directors. Asked during an online news conference on Saturday to provide reasons for that position, Richards at first refused. When pressed he said: “We must consider that advocate Arendse was the lead independent director during the period of the appointment of Thabang Moroe [as CSA’s chief executive in September 2017], as well the [stillborn Global League T20], and a number of other issues — specifically utterances with regard to CSA during the period he’s been off the board.”

The council’s bleating about “utterances” is easily batted away by the fact that Arendse — a fiery senior counsel — has criticised CSA’s catastrophes as an organisation. He has not taken aim, publicly, at individuals. Did Richards forget that he was also on the board that green-lit the GLT20 and appointed Moroe? Those decisions are connected in that Moroe’s predecessor, Haroon Lorgat, was hanged with what the board said were questionable practices in the way he was trying to organise the league. Once Lorgat was out of the way, Moroe — until then a council member himself and vice-president of the board — was installed as chief executive.

Somehow neither the members council nor the board heard the governance alarms that would have been rung by Moroe making that leap, which was instrumental in CSA crashing to its deepest crises. The chickens came home to roost in August last year, when Moroe was sacked for serious mismanagement. But the council was quick to protest, unsuccessfully, when Lorgat was named to the interim board.

Another example of the council’s fractured thinking was had on Saturday when it raised concerns that only one woman would be on the board: Muditambi Ravele, an experienced administrator who will serve as an independent member. But that followed the council having to choose between Simphiwe Ndzundzu, a man, and Anne Vilas, a woman, to fill one of the five seats it had been granted on the board — and opting for Ndzundzu. 

Muhammad Seedat, the chair of the nominations committee given the authority to appoint the independent directors, paid the council the respect of considering their objection. But when the annual meeting resumed on Wednesday, Arendse was confirmed as an independent. Among the others is Andrew Hudson, the former Test opener and erstwhile convenor of the national selection panel.

Quite what the council hoped to achieve by delaying cricket’s progress from Saturday to Wednesday is a mystery. Maybe when much of what you’ve been doing for years has amounted to getting in the way of the game going forward, another few days doesn’t matter.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Conway goes a long way to find a place he can trust

“He looked at me with those steely eyes of his and he said, ‘I want to play cricket for South Africa and I want to get good marks.’” – Devon Conway’s high school coach, Adrian Norris.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

A superbly fit, overtly competitive, ultimately ordinary off-spinner leaves Pietermaritzburg for Nottingham and becomes Kevin Pietersen. An unflashy allrounder goes from Johannesburg to Wellington and turns into Grant Elliott. They are among a slew of examples where those came from: South Africa. Devon Conway added his name to the list this week.

Conway’s 200 at Lord’s made him the 111th man to reach a century on Test debut and the 12th from South Africa. Sort of. Andrew Hudson, Jacques Rudolph, Alviro Petersen, Faf du Plessis, Stiaan van Zyl and Stephen Cook know the feeling of making a hundred in their first Test. So do Kepler Wessels and Keaton Jennings.

But Wessels’ 162 at the Gabba in November 1982 was scored from under a not exactly baggy green helmet, while Jennings made his 112 at Wankhede in December 2016 wearing three lions rampant. As did Andrew Strauss for his 112 against New Zealand in May 2004 at Lord’s, Matt Prior for his unbeaten 126 against West Indies in May 2007 also at Lord’s, and Jonathan Trott for his 119 against Australia at the Oval in August 2009.

Conway’s headgear is black and emblazoned with a silver fern. At his high school, St John’s College in Johannesburg, it didn’t matter much on Wednesday that he does not don the protea badge. “We watched bits and pieces [on television] between classes,” Adrian Norris, the master in charge of cricket and a major influence on the player Conway has become, told Cricbuzz on Thursday. “He got to 30, and then we had load-shedding for three hours. So we kept track online from 30 until he was about 105, when we were able to watch again.”

Norris’ words help explain why Conway moved from Joburg to Wellington in August 2017. South Africa’s poorly maintained infrastructure means there isn’t enough electricity to keep all of the country’s lights on all of the time. So, sporadically since January 2008 and sometimes for days and weeks on end, scheduled rolling blackouts share the darkness. Sometimes your lights are off while your friends’ kilometres away are on. Sometimes it’s the other way around. You know when you will be able to cook dinner by consulting an app — several are readily available — on your smartphone.

Load-shedding has become emblematic of a South Africa that is failing to meet the expectations of a nation that, by defeating apartheid at the ballot box in April 1994, thought its worst days were behind it. Twenty-seven years on, we know our trust was misplaced.

“Devon was always the type of person who wanted trust,” Norris said. “We made sure we looked after him — we would get him something to eat, because sometimes he would skip the boarding school breakfast — and then he produced the goods and scored hundreds. He’s a very loyal person. It’s difficult to get into his trust, but once you’re in there you will be for life. He’ll do anything for you.”

Maybe Conway couldn’t trust South Africa enough to want to continue to make a life and a career there. Aged 26, he sold his home, his car and much of the rest of his material possessions and, with his partner, headed for New Zealand.

He had had a solid junior career — he made two half-centuries for Gauteng’s under-13 side, a hundred for the under-15s, and two centuries and a double ton for the under-19s. He scored 13 centuries in provincial first-class cricket. But at the higher franchise level, where he played only 21 matches in more than six years, Conway never reached three figures in 36 innings. So how big a role did cricket play in his decision?

It’s a worn trope that South Africa chases away some of its best and brightest in the cause of trying to make its national teams look more like the nation they represent. Did Conway feel hard done by because he is white? “Absolutely not,” Norris said. “In all our conversations we’ve had, he has never brought that up. He and his partner just wanted a different life experience, and that’s what they’ve got.”

Norris spoke of an apartment near the Wanderers, paid for by Gauteng cricket, that housed some of the province’s most promising players. Conway was among them. “In that flat lived five or six black African guys who were his mates. At times he would get picked ahead of them, and at times one of them would get picked ahead of him. I think he would have said, ‘These are my mates. How can I say I’m not getting picked because of the colour of my skin? They’re getting picked because they’re good enough.’”

A less often acknowledged aspect of the race dynamic is that, were it not for South Africa’s efforts to equalise opportunities across the game, world cricket would likely never have heard of Makhaya Ntini, Hashim Amla, Vernon Philander or Kagiso Rabada. Their talent and skill was undoubted and they worked hard for the success they earned. But talent, skill and hard work aren’t enough in a society more cruelly skewed in favour of the affluent than any other. The affluent are disproportionately white.

All but one of the South Africans who have won Test caps playing for other countries have come from relatively affluent whiteness. They, or their families, have had access to means to change their realities. Those means have been purposefully denied others. At 26, Conway owned property and a car and other stuff worth buying. Millions of his comparatively less well-off compatriots, almost all of them black and brown, their prospects for a decent life stolen from them by substandard education, low level jobs — if they have work at all — and life in a tin shack — if they are not surviving on the street — have nothing to sell and no hope of starting over somewhere else. That is by design, not accident. The single exception proves the rule: Basil D’Oliveira had to rescue himself, with John Arlott’s assistance, from just such an existence to show the world how well he could play cricket. The world outside South Africa, that is.

Even so, Conway is not a cookie-cutter example of privilege — he needed a bursary to gain entry to one of the country’s most elite schools. “I remember that interview,” Norris said. “I asked him why he wanted to come to St John’s, and he looked at me with those steely eyes of his and he said, ‘I want to play cricket for South Africa and I want to get good marks.’”

Did it sadden Norris that New Zealand, not South Africa, is reaping the benefits of the first half of that ambition? “Kids who come through our hands, we obviously want them to represent their country of birth. But the reality of the situation is that he is representing himself and challenging himself at the highest possible level. The world has become so small. Sportsmen will go overseas because that’s where the money is.”

Umpteen cricketminded reactionaries have been spewing ill-considered race politics on social media since about the time the power went out at St John’s on Wednesday. That professional sport in South Africa is too small and impoverished to contain all the talent the country produces is not a truth often aired there. Conway himself was in the same dormitory at St John’s boarding facility as Scott Spedding, who captained the first XV and went on to play 23 Tests for France, and Kenyan-born Brit Chris Froome, the four-time Tour de France champion.

“We’ve got a kid at St John’s now who’s just been signed by [top French rugby club] La Rochelle,” Norris said. “And he’s black African. The professional systems overseas are just so much more established. There’s money there. You can go and play [rugby] in the third league in France and you can do very well [financially]. You can play [cricket] for a second-tier county in England and do pretty well for six or seven months of the year.”

Conway has raised himself above and beyond that level, but Norris said he hadn’t forgotten what mattered: “He’s very humble and calm. He never got too hard on himself at school, or too excited. He’s very balanced. Sometimes I’ll send him a message, and it comes back with, ‘Thank you, Sir.’ The ups and downs of cricket over the years have been his classroom. He’s taken all those lessons on board and he’s now producing the goods.”

Not that Norris was trying to hog Conway’s limelight: “It’s madness to claim an individual.” He listed Jimmy Cook, Graham Ford, Grant Morgan as instrumental in moulding the new toast of New Zealand — the seventh man to score a double century on Test debut and the first debutant foreign opener to get to three figures on England’s seaming pitches.

Norris also made a case for schools like St John’s no longer existing chiefly to prop up privilege, even if from outside their tall walls it can look like that is still their mission: “We’re here to expose kids to different aspects of life and to turn them into good human beings.”

By the look and sound of him these past two days, and quite apart from his brilliant batting, Conway would seem to have added his name to that list, too.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

‘Hash’ is back, but it isn’t all good news

“He knows English conditions very well and I’d give him a chance ahead of a youngster who maybe hasn’t been there much before.” – Andrew Hudson on picking Hashim Amla for the World Cup.

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in London

THE good news is Hashim Amla played his first game in more than a month on Sunday. The less good news is he didn’t exactly shoot the lights out, and that neither did one of his theoretical rivals for a place in South Africa’s World Cup squad.

Before Sunday, Amla was last in action on March 1 in a one-day game for the Cobras against the Lions at Newlands.

Then he took temporary leave of the game to help look after his ailing father, and all the while speculation has swirled.

Without much game time what kind of form would he be in by the time South Africa played their World Cup opener against England at the Oval on May 30?

The 108 not out and 59 he made in the ODI series against Pakistan in January was a relief for those wondering whether his star had faded to grey, but the fact that he has gone 27 completed Test innings without a century has made others wonder whether he would be a liability at the tournament.

Would you pick ‘Hash’?

“Yes,” former selection convenor Andrew Hudson said on Monday in unusually clipped tones because he was speaking from the splendour of a fairway at Champagne in the Drakensberg.

Why would he select him?

“He knows English conditions very well and I’d give him a chance ahead of a youngster who maybe hasn’t been there much before.”

So the Cobras’ confirmation on Friday that Amla was available “for at least the opening matches” in the T20 competition was welcomed as a sign of normal service resuming imminently.

And there he duly was at the Wanderers on Sunday, opening the batting with Janneman Malan against the Lions.

Amla took three runs, all singles, to midwicket and third man, off the first six balls he faced.

Then he cracked a short and wide effort from Dwaine Pretorius past point for four.

A single and a two came in the same over, and in the next, bowled by Wiaan Mulder, Amla whipped a delivery on his legs over midwicket for six.

It was sent on its way with the same inexplicable ease cricketminded people have been admiring since even before he made his first-class debut in December 1999, aged 16.

Could the stroke be evidence that he was getting back to the player he has been for the almost 20 years that have followed?

The question was answered swiftly and decisively. Amla tried to tickle the next delivery to third man, like a right-handed Kepler Wessels, with a bat too wide of his body for the purpose. The resultant edge spilled the bails from his stumps, and that was that: 16 off 12, not the stuff grand comebacks are made of.

But it was a touch better than Reeza Hendricks, who opened for the Lions and scored 11 off 13 before trying to hit the 14th a long way using only half his bat and being caught at mid-on.

Hendricks did his chances of going to the World Cup no harm by making 65 and 66 in the last two T20s South Africa played against Sri Lanka last month.

That followed his meagre mustering of 42 in four innings in the ODIs, 29 of them in one innings.

So Hendricks, too, will have to do better. He should get the chance to do so against the Dolphins at Kingsmead on Wednesday — when the Cobras will be in Benoni to play the Titans.

Will we see Amla in that match? And should we wonder whether what he did on Sunday and might do on Wednesday will have any impact on whether his name will be among the 15 Linda Zondi will present next Thursday as South Africa’s World Cup squad?

What about Hendricks? Is their room for both?

Then there’s Aiden Markram, who made 63 for Hampshire against Essex in their opening round of championship matches in Southampton on Friday, and who is also in the mix to partner Quinton de Kock at the top of the order at the World Cup.

This won’t help answer those questions, but Amla has played 41 first-class matches in England along with 39 white-ball games. 

Hendricks? Three T20 internationals, six list A games, and 16 in the Lancashire League.

Hudson stopped having to think about that kind of thing when he stepped aside in 2015 and was succeeded by Zondi — who is no doubt looking forward to some golf himself.

Maybe after next Thursday.

SA need Amla fit and firing to tame World Cup unicorn

“It seems you win the World Cup when your senior guys have a blinder. ‘Hash’ is one of those guys, but he needs to be injury-free and in good form.” – Andrew Hudson, former selection convenor

Sunday Times

TELFORD VICE in London

AND the award for the newspaper that has finally broken through the 311, not out, shades of grey Hashim Amla has been trotting out to the press for years goes to …

“I’m the pretty face on the billboard,” Amla was quoted as saying in the North Coast Courier in a feature on a luxury housing development he has bought into and, it seems, is helping to market.

The Durban knock-and-drop has found what no publication has hitherto: a chink of mischief in the otherwise solidly stoic edifice Amla has aimed at the world, evidence of a character as upright as his backlift has been askance for the 17 995 runs he has scored in 415 innings in all flavours of South Africa shirts in almost 14 years as an international.

Since July 2012, the pinnacle of all that has been his undefeated 311 at The Oval. But an even greater prize is within Amla’s reach, and his quest to claim it will begin at the same ground on May 30 next year.

That’s where South Africa will play England in the opening match of the World Cup, a unicorn Amla is central to taming.

He has scored more ODI runs in England than any other South Africa batsman, and in fewer innings than Jacques Kallis, Mark Boucher, Herschelle Gibbs and AB de Villiers. He also has the highest score and the best average among top six South Africa batsmen there. And all that as an opening batsman, on pitches as fresh as the ball and the bowlers.

But what matters most is that he has been there, done that in 169 ODIs, 18 of them — more than any other active South Africa player — in England.  

“You’ve got to take guys who’ve got some experience,” former selection convenor Andrew Hudson said. “The ball swings more in England than in other conditions and young guys can struggle there.

“If you’ve got South African form or Australian form that’s nice, but you need guys who’ve been to England before and know how to play in those conditions.

“It seems you win the World Cup when your senior guys have a blinder. ‘Hash’ is one of those guys, but he needs to be injury-free and in good form.”

Ah, the F-word. There’s no denying that Amla’s form has dipped from the glittering heights he scaled to score 26 centuries and 36 50s.

He last made an ODI hundred against a decent attack at Centurion in February 2016, when England were the opposition.

But, if South Africa are to break their World Cup duck, Amla will have to fire because, as Hudson conceded, South Africa are short on seasoned quality batsmen: “One of them would have been AB and Faf [du Plessis] is another, but there aren’t too many more.”

Happily, that doesn’t apply to bowlers, even though, as Hudson said, “The length you bowl in England is completely different to what you bowl in South Africa and Australia, and it helps if you can get some swing.”

It does, and it’s easier to learn to bowl fuller than it is to cultivate the art of swing, something few South Africa quicks have mastered. But it’s difficult to look past the threat posed by the sheer pace and bounce harboured by a young, proper fast bowler like Lungi Ngidi in anything other than sub-continent conditions.

If there’s room for a bolter in South Africa’s World Cup squad, it should go to Dwaine Pretorius, a can bat, can bowl, can field, can bring a good attitude to any situation player who won’t let anyone down.

Whether South Africa can win the tournament with the players available to them is the great unanswerable, less so that Amla is key.

Not just a pretty face, then.

Lightning strikes from above and below at Wanderers

Just you wait, china, we’ll show you how to play this game when the Aussies come to Wanderers.

TMG Digital

TELFORD VICE in Johannesburg

A beery mix of messages is brewed in the stands that rise steeply from the boundary at the Wanderers.

Most of them are meant to offer support to the team of the crowd’s choice, but ugliness is often also in the house.

All of those emotions are, of course, intangible. But an all to real symbol of ugliness runs from outside the dressingrooms to the boundary.

It’s the plexiglass tunnel that was erected in the wake of Merv Hughes’ and a spectator’s explosion of expletives that culminated in the fast bowler smashing his bat into the metre-high fence that separated him from his antagoniser.

That was in March 1994 in a match that was also blighted by Hughes’ verbal abuse of Gary Kirsten and Shane Warne’s outrageous send-off of Andrew Hudson.

Has a meeker pair of players than Kirsten and Hudson ever roamed a cricket ground?

And why hasn’t the Wanderers, where some of cricket’s most innovative marketing struts its stuff, not thought of getting Hughes, who’s around with a group of travelling Aussie fans, to unveil a plaque proclaiming, “The Merv Hughes Tunnel”?

Wisden said of the Warne incident that “rarely on a cricket field has physical violence seemed so close”.

Clearly, Wisden hasn’t spent enough time at the Wanderers, where the seed for violence is probably sewn in the cars sludging their way, one tyre revolution as a time, towards a parking spot in what would be a significantly less congested area if it didn’t have to put up with a stadium, a golf course and a sports club — all named Wanderers — in its midst.

And, being Joburgers, each of them wants to drive their own car there, further clogging roads that are falling into disrepair as a result.

Things don’t get much easier for fans once they’ve parked and made their way to their seats. Concourses are narrower than in many modern grounds and therefore more crowded, which can make buying a beer and a boerewors roll or going to the toilet a tedious business.

But these are, as we said, Joburgers: they put up with the banal hellishness of William Nicol Drive just to be able to walk under the fake starry, starry sky of the unmentionably tawdry Montecasino. What’s an extra few minutes in a beer queue, which you can spend working on your anger management?

Besides, despite the speedbumps, a lot of beer goes down throats regardless. And a lot of nastiness comes up those throats.

As long as it’s limited to words, it’s manageable. As we saw at Newlands in the third test between South Africa and Australia, the worst offenders are removed from the ground.

But another side of the character of the common or garden Joburger is intense competitiveness.

So those okes in PE thought they were being breekers by turning up in Sonny Bill Williams masks? And in Cape Town they wen’t quietly when the cops arrived?

Just you wait, china, we’ll show you how to play this game when the Aussies come to Wanderers.

That is, of course, a composite caricature. But it is also a flavour of the kind of stuff that has been flying around social media this week, and a far less vicious version.

Now the Aussies have indeed come — the fourth test starts at the Wanderers on Friday.

More often than not the Wanderers is a wonderful place to watch cricket, the electricity in the stands competing with lightning bolts from above for atmospheric superiority.

If the Wanderers is for you, who can be against you?

Not even a team who score 434/4 in a one-day international. As every cricketminded South African knows and every Australian has tried to forget, South Africa’s reply at the Wanderers on March 12, 2006 was 438/9.

But the ugliness can strike like one of those lightning bolts, and even though its probable prime target has been removed what with the despised David Warner now banned and out of harm’s way in Australia, it won’t take much to spark violence.

We’ve seen enough of what isn’t cricket since the Australians arrived.

Please, Wanderers, be the bigger people.