How Wanderers helped make Kohli’s India

Whether South Africa have learnt their lessons from the bruising 2018 Joburg Test will be gleaned when the teams clash on the Highveld again this month.

Telford Vice | Cape Town

INDIA’S most recent Test in South Africa, at the Wanderers in January 2018, did not go gentle into that good night that falls softly when, finally, the sprinklers soak the stretch of uncovered earth that is spent and striated after serving us as many as five days of keenly contested cricket. Instead a pitch of payback for a nasty Nagpur surface during South Africa’s series in India in November 2015 dominated proceedings, and the headlines. 

Michael Holding, then more a commentator on the game than its social justice conscience, held the front page: “Two out of a hundred; it’s a shit pitch. This is not a cricket pitch, this is dangerous. Call it off. Forget it. You can’t play cricket on that. I have no idea what has gone wrong but I know it’s not a good cricket pitch.” Something’s up when a fast bowler complains about a pitch that aids and abets fast bowling.

Play was suspended late on the third day, so that umpires Ian Gould and Aleem Dar could consult match referee Andy Pycroft on what to do, after Jasprit Bumrah had nailed Dean Elgar on the helmet. It was the first time in the match a batter had taken a blow to the head, but the ninth time in not quite nine sessions that the medics had been called onto the field to deal with the results of the ball thudding into various parts — mostly the hands — of different bodies. The man who then ran the Wanderers, Greg Fredericks, the chief executive of the Gauteng Cricket Board and someone rendered unafraid by his long years spent fighting apartheid, including from inside a jail cell, paid a cautious visit to the pressbox to gauge the media mood. 

More than three hours later, the ICC explained: “The on-field umpires will continue to monitor the pitch, and consult the match referee should the pitch deteriorate further. The welfare of the players is paramount and two of the most experienced match officials are in charge of the game and will take appropriate decisions.” Play resumed on the fourth morning, after a delay while the maligned groundstaff dealt with a wet outfield. Parthiv Patel’s broken finger — he was replaced by Dinesh Karthik — was the closest we came to serious injury. Life went on.

Less often recalled than all that is the result and its context. India won, by 63 runs with a day and a bit to spare, on the most un-Asian pitch imaginable. Asked to meet a challenge the South Africans had calculated was beyond them, they did. And more: that was India’s first success outside Asia and the similar surfaces of the Caribbean since July 2014, when they won at Lord’s. Before that they went 14 Tests outside of their comfort zone without winning, 10 of them lost. That lean run started after they were victorious at Kingsmead in December 2010. But the Wanderers win marked the start of a happier part of the journey for Virat Kohli’s team. They have since played 20 Tests in England, Australia and New Zealand, winning seven and drawing three. Was the relative allround sledgehammer India have become, regardless of conditions, forged in the molten heat of four days in Joburg in January 2018?

The way Kohli saluted the end of the game and the series, by taking a deeply cynical bow, a veritable physical sneer, a bombastic cameo, offered strong evidence in favour of that argument. India’s captain, as tall a totem as any team have ever had, was viscerally angry, and just as clearly incandescent with pride, and as close to the edge of the cliff of unacceptable behaviour as even he could dare to go, and also defiant in the face of the arrogance of opponents who thought they could dictate terms in their own backyard. He was magnificent.           

Whether South Africa have learnt their lessons from that bruising, in every sense, match will be gleaned when the teams clash on the Highveld again later this month. They were to have resumed hostilities where they left off, but practicality has trumped poetry and the series will start in Centurion on December 26 before returning to the scene of 2018’s passion on January 3 and moving to Newlands on January 11.

Of South Africa’s XI at the Wanderers almost four years ago, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Faf du Plessis, Vernon Philander and Morné Morkel have retired. That’s damn near half a damn fine team. India will return with four of their five stars from that gnarly encounter: Cheteshwar Pujara and Kohli, who scored a gritty half-century each, and Bumrah and Mohammed Shami, who claimed five-wicket hauls. Shami’s 5/28 in the second innings — centred on a 10-ball burst of naked aggression that earned him three wickets for a single run — was a thing of shimmering beauty, the equal of the best fast bowling yet seen in a country not short of quality quick stuff.

The missing piece of the puzzle is Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who gutsed out 125 balls at the batting crease, was last out and ninth out for his 63 runs, took four wickets and limited the damage to 2.24 an over, and was named the player of what has turned out to be the last Test in which he has appeared.

And so that good night came and the sprinklers soaked the now cursed uncovered earth that was spent and striated after a contest that veered beyond keen into dangerous territory. It is one of the secret pleasures of cricket writers to be there when that happens, to see the pitch and the outfield take their rest and reward in respectful silence and splendid isolation unsullied by trespassers like spectators, players and umpires. As the water flows onto the ground below, so the ideas and the words they generate flow into keyboards, and from there into the ether itself, in the pressbox above. Everything about the scene changes. Coolth wafts over, the sun bids a spectacular adieu, the light fades to velvet, insects spike the sky. There is magic.

Covid has taken that from us: we will have to be out of the ground an hour after play ends. But we will, like all who see it, take the cricket with us. It is ours to keep.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

South Africa improve, but not enough to win

“Ja, but our standard is high.” – Heinrich Klaasen refuses to feel better about a narrow loss. 

Telford Vice | Cape Town

SOUTH Africa’s players huddled so tightly together on Lahore’s outfield on Thursday that you would have struggled to smuggle a team sheet between them. Heinrich Klaasen spoke earnestly, hands slicing through evening air heavy with dew to punctuate his points. His players listened intently. David Miller made a significant contribution to the conversation. Klaasen handed a cap to debutant Jacques Snyman, who received it as if he had been given the keys to the car of his dreams.

Eyes locked. Shoulders overlapped. Heads nodded to the unmistakable rhythm of agreement. Even from the other hemisphere you could feel the unity. There was heat in that huddle, which was more a hug.

For South Africans weary of turning on their televisions to see what new hell has befallen the side in Pakistan, they were the picture of a team as opposed to a collection of individuals. It helped that none of them had played in the Tests, and so didn’t bring baggage from Karachi and Rawalpindi, where South Africa were almost as good at beating themselves as Pakistan were at winning. Of the XI who had played in South Africa’s previous T20I, against England at Newlands in December, only Reeza Hendricks, Lutho Sipamla and Tabraiz Shamsi were in the team. Another good thing: England won that series 3-0.

Even so, South Africa took 200 T20I caps into Thursday’s match: 10 more than Pakistan, which you wouldn’t have thought considering the noise made, far and wide, about a looming mismatch. All this bunch of South Africans needed to convince, most importantly, themselves that they belonged on the same field as opponents who had already been written up as victors was for something to go conspicuously right, preferably early in the piece …

Second ball of the match. Babar Azam bunts it to the on side and sets off. The bowler, the left-arm spinning, right-arm throwing Bjorn Fortuin, hares after it. He sprawls to make a scragging stop and, seeing a fraction more than one stump, throws from a prone position. Bails balloon, stumps splay. Babar is short of his ground by a metre and more. Roll credits.

It doesn’t go more conspicuously right than that. But, of course, the credits didn’t roll then. First Mohammad Rizwan scored 104 not out, his second unbeaten century in five days and an innings as bristling with aggression as his previous hundred was built on discipline. And the lack of firepower in South Africa’s attack, denuded of Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortjé, was exposed. Pakistan play without the arrogance that sours the impression other teams make, but they are perhaps the most alpha male of all sides — they will bully bowling that doesn’t stand up for itself. Only Shamsi, who turned the ball sharply in his first match of the tour, escaped with an economy rate of less than a run a ball. Junior Dala was at the other end of the equation, sailing for 25 off two overs. Happily, although Rizwan was dropped twice in the 90s, the overall standard of South Africa’s fielding was a notch or three up from what the Test team delivered.

Seven totals higher than Pakistan’s effort of 169/6 had been scored in the first innings of the previous 11 T20Is in Lahore. And all but one of the six times the team batting first had won a day-night T20I there, they had made more than the home side’s total. How big a factor would the thickening dew be in the second innings? Enough to fog up Aleem Dar’s glasses and thus furrow his brow, for a start.

Hendricks faced only a dozen deliveries in an opening stand of 53 dominated by Janneman Malan, who hit eight fours — mostly muscled to the on side — in his 44. But Hendricks saw Usman Qadir’s leg break hit the top of Malan’s off stump and his googly crash into the top of Snyman’s middle stump. Then Miller flashed at a delivery from Faheem Ashraf that faded across the left-hander, and nicked it. At 83/3, and needing more than 10 from each of the last eight overs, South Africa’s challenge was waning.

Klaasen joined Hendricks to rekindle it with a stand that reached 32 before Klaasen picked out the man on the square leg boundary. But before that he was party to something previously unknown. Given out leg-before to Qadir’s googly, Klaasen offered up a prayer to the third umpire. Missing leg, the gizmo said. And with that Dar’s record of never having been proven wrong in T20I referrals was erased at the 12th attempt. 

Hendricks ran himself out for 54 by dashing for a single that was never there after losing sight of a ball he had edged into his pads. It needed a dive from the swooping Rizwan to complete the dismissal. Surely that was the end of the South Africans?

It looked that way when they headed into the last over needing 19. Two singles accrued before Dwaine Pretorius hammered Ashraf over long-on for six. Another single left the equation at 10 off two. Fortuin, hobbling on a twisted ankle, found the wherewithal to fashion a four over his shoulder. One ball. Six to get. Fortuin lined up the midwicket fence, but didn’t get enough bat on it and the ground-hugging ball was fielded at deep backward square.

Even though the South Africans showed more fight on Thursday than in Karachi and Rawalpindi, Pakistan deserved their win, not least because of the brilliance of Rizwan and Qadir. No-one needs to tell the visitors it’s a long way from going down with credit in a T20I to competing in a Test, but South Africans could see something on their televisions they haven’t spotted for a while: light at the end of the tunnel.

South Africans besides Klaasen, that is: “Ja, but our standard is high. One or two things with the bowling didn’t go according to plan, so we’ll reassess that. And then those four or five overs in the middle [of the innings when Qadir went for two runs off each of his first two overs], when we really made life very difficult for ourselves. Because we could have chased between seven and 10 in the last over and got over the line easily. It is pleasing to see we are playing good cricket, but it’s frustrating and disappointing by our standards. We know exactly what we want and what we need to do to be a successful team.”

He sounded so South African. He sounded utterly real. He sounded like the captain of a team, not a collection of individuals.

First published by Cricbuzz.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.