Dané’s inferno greets Van Niekerk veto

“The team have pulled together and accept the decision we have made.” — Clinton du Preez, CSA’s women’s selection convenor, on Dané van Niekerk’s axing.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

DANé van Niekerk’s omission on fitness grounds from South Africa’s T20 World Cup squad amounts to self-inflicted sabotage of the home side’s chances of winning their first senior global trophy. You didn’t need to go far to find that view after the selectors announced and defended their decision on Tuesday.

“Absolutely broken,” Van Niekerk posted on social media after she was left out because she had failed to complete a run of two kilometres in nine-and—a-half minutes or less. “One of the best captains in world cricket,” Marizanne Kapp, Van Niekerk’s wife and South Africa’s star allrounder, replied. “You will be missed! The Lord has bigger plans!” Dale Steyn wrote: “Oh fuck, I missed my 2km time by seconds, must mean I’m shit.” Also on social media, Herschelle Gibbs took the opposite view: “You miss it by two or 10 seconds, it’s a fail irrespective of who you are … it’s 2023 not 1990.”

The real-world repercussions have started. Cricbuzz understands Kapp has withdrawn from the T20I series final between South Africa and West Indies in East London on Thursday, and the sudden international retirements of Van Niekerk or Kapp, or indeed both, cannot be ruled out.

Had Van Niekerk made the grade she would have captained South Africa in the T20 World Cup, which will start at Newlands on February 10 with a game between the hosts and Sri Lanka. Instead Suné Luus will lead the side.

It isn’t the first time South Africa’s teams have been affected by CSA’s insistence on the enforcement of fitness and conditioning standards are less stringently observed by cricket authorities in other countries. Lizelle Lee retired from the international arena in July over a failed skin folds test. Sisanda Magala has fallen foul of the rules several times and been punished by omission from the side. He is currently in the ODI squad and showed his value by taking a matchwinning 3/46 against England in Bloemfontein on Friday.

Van Niekerk hasn’t played since September 2021. She fractured an ankle in a fall at her home in January last year, which put her out of the ODI World Cup in New Zealand in March and April. Now mended and prepared, she is fitter than she has been in the past — or before July 2022, when CSA, to keep up with a steadily quickening, more physical global game, raised the height of the fitness hoops players had to jump through to be eligible for selection. 

South Africa have won 15 of their 28 completed T20Is with Van Niekerk as captain. Since she has been injured, they have won just five of 12. From Van Niekerk’s T20I debut in June 2009, only Shabnim Ismail and Kapp have taken more wickets in either format for South Africa. Only Lee has scored more runs in T20Is for South Africa than Van Niekerk. Had the fitness criteria been hiked to where they are now when Van Niekerk’s career was starting, she might never have played for the national teams.

Did CSA understand the effect their decision on Van Niekerk might have on the mental well-being of a squad going into a major tournament? “We considered everything,” Clinton du Preez, CSA’s women’s selection convenor, told a press conference on Tuesday. “We had the discussion around what happens if Dané doesn’t make it; how does that impact. But from a player point of view we’ve created succession in the leadership within the team. The morale of the team is fine. I believe the team have pulled together and that they accept the decision we have made, and that it is required for the good of our players.”

Du Preez made plain that the failed fitness test was all that had deprived South Africa of Van Niekerk’s talent, skill, experience and leadership: “Dané was given an extensive opportunity to meet the minimum criteria, or the fitness benchmark for eligibility into the World Cup. She recently did another fitness test and unfortunately did not meet the minimum criteria, and therefore she’s missed out. It’s purely based on not meeting the fitness criteria that she’s missed out.”

He said a different method to test Van Niekerk’s fitness, believed to involve a treadmill, had been used in addition to normal running: “We’ve tried extensively to assist Dané to get over the line. As a selection panel and a management team we made the commitment that we want to give her the best opportunity to try and get into the squad. Therefore we considered all the other options.”

Van Niekerk’s worth as a player and captain was not in doubt, Du Preez said: “Dané has been an integral part of the team. Her skill-set will always be missed on the field. We’ve had this discussion with her. We’ve extensively reminded her of that, and appreciated the hard work that she’s put in to try to get to the fitness levels.” 

If CSA understood that, why were they rigid about a decreed standard of fitness? “It’s about remaining consistent with our decisions,” Du Preez said. “It’s not something that has been brought about recently. Many other players have gone down this route. We’ve had open discussions about it with everyone. Everyone was quite familiar with the situation and what was required.

“In December we had the discussion with Dané, where we set out clearly what she needs to do and where we expect her to be while acknowledging the improvement she has shown.

“For us as a team, and with the management team to support them, they really want to set the fitness benchmark and ensure all the players meet that. It isn’t anything untoward towards Dané as a cricketer. We treat everyone fairly and we want to remain consistent in our decisions.”

That is the other side of the argument. If all the players who are not Van Niekerk are able to satisfy the stopwatch, why not Van Niekerk? What would it say if allowances were made for favourites? Why should players bother busting a gut when the same degree of measurable gut-busting is not required of everybody?

Some of those players might pose a different question, which could cut both ways: why put in the hard work if some suit can, at the stroke of a pen, undermine an entire squad days before a World Cup?

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Women deserve a bigger slice of cricket’s cake

“Ninety percent of the time it’s just your dad sitting there cheering you on.” – Nadine de Klerk on the loneliness of the female cricketer.

Telford Vice / Cape Town

“WHERE’S my cake?” Sinalo Jafta’s question was wrapped in wide-eyed mock disbelief. She probably didn’t think she would have to put in an appearance in a mall rammed to the rafters with mournfully shuffling Christmas shoppers on Thursday, her birthday.

But there the wicketkeeper-batter was, cheerfully turning 28 in the midst of strangers going nowhere slowly. Why? The answer shone from a nearby transparent box — which held the women’s T20 World Cup trophy.

In stark contrast to the weary glumness all around, ebullience beamed from the irrepressible Jafta as, in conversation with Cricbuzz, she hammed up the circumstances of her presence: “On my birthday even? Come on ICC! But I’m very glad that I get to share the day around people who love the sport. Previously I’ve spent it with my friends. Now cricket is part of my birthday!

“I was thinking about it last night. I’m about to tap into the third floor; the 30s. You should have your life together at that point. I’m not a junior anymore, and hopefully the maturity in age can also mature my game.”

Unlike with their jaded male counterparts, positivity tends to come standard in female cricketers. Do women need to be buoyant — or feel the need to be buoyant — to try to prove they are good for cricket and to hold on to their unfairly small share of the spotlight?

The most recent women’s T20 World Cup, in Australia in June 2020, earned 1.1-billion video views across ICC platforms. That represented a twentyfold increase on the previous tournament in 2018, and went up to 1.68-billion for the women’s ODI World Cup in New Zealand in March and April. The 86,174 who were at the MCG to see Australia play India in the 2020 women’s T20 World Cup final was 5,532 more than the crowd who turned up to watch England and Pakistan contest the final of the men’s tournament at the same venue in November. But the ICC said last month that the latter event garnered 6.58-billion video views — almost four times as many as the women’s ODI World Cup six months earlier.

Maybe the exponential difference explains why the organisers of a global event see value in putting players and their prize in the path of the public trudging around a mall during the craziness of the last shopping days before Christmas. Men’s tournaments don’t need to engineer happenstance to earn attention. Instead, attention finds them. That reality is unlikely to be changed by the 2023 women’s T20 World Cup, which will be played in Cape Town, Paarl and Gqeberha in February.

But progress is being made in other areas. “When I started playing we weren’t really professional,” Jafta said. “Now we have the 15 national contracts. Then you have the 10 high performance contracts and six for every province. It’s the perfect start to someone’s career, knowing you can play and still earn something. CSA have done a good job there.”

Jafta made her provincial debut in January 2011 and first played for South Africa in October 2016. Nadine de Klerk and Delmi Tucker, who were also on mall duty, initially turned out for their provinces in October 2013 and October 2011 and for South Africa in May 2017 and this July. In that time, women’s cricket has moved significantly towards the centre of the global game — even in places like South Africa where cricket has, on the whole, gone backwards.

But cricketminded South Africans are notoriously stuck in the past. How much more mainstream they consider the women’s game will be measured in the grandstands and on the grass banks of Newlands, Boland Park and St George’s Park in February. It’s one thing to fill grounds in countries where first-world values hold sway or where cricket is central to the culture, quite another to convince a deeply misogynist society like South Africa’s, where football rules, that a woman’s place in cricket is on the field and not on the boundary keeping score or in the kitchen making tea and sandwiches. Will the women’s T20 World Cup draw spectators in decent enough numbers?

“We were [at the mall] yesterday as well, and a lot of people were asking questions about the tournament,” De Klerk told Cricbuzz. Tucker concurred: “I’m a shy person, but it’s exciting. The badge means something to people. It’s good to wear it and get people coming up to you to ask questions. You can explain what it means to you.”

De Klerk could only dream of the “breathtaking” experience the South Africans had on their tour to India in September and October 2019: “The stands were absolutely packed and we couldn’t hear each other on the field. You want that kind of backing. In South Africa we don’t get big crowds, so I hope there’s a turnaround in this World Cup. Hopefully we get more people than just our families. Ninety percent of the time it’s just your dad sitting there cheering you on.” 

Tucker nodded in agreement: “The tension grows if there are more people watching you, but it’s quite exciting if they are there supporting you. We were playing the [T20] Super League [at Newlands earlier this month] and there was no-one. We said we wished there was someone cheering us on. When we played in England [in July] there was a massive difference.”

Wayne Parnell knows about playing in front of big crowds. What he didn’t know, before he made his junior provincial debut in December 2002, was that the game wasn’t solely a male preserve. “My first interaction with any female playing cricket was with Claire Terblanche in Eastern Province,” Parnell told Cricbuzz. “I must have been an under-13 and I saw her with her Eastern Province tracksuit on, and I was told that she also plays cricket. That was the first time I knew that girls play cricket.”

Terblanche, who won 27 caps for South Africa as an off-spinning allrounder and is now a successful coach, was also in the mall mix. Not that long ago, putting four fully fledged female internationals on show in South Africa outside of an actual cricket setting would have been unthinkable. For Parnell, that carried a personal message: “I have a daughter now, so it’s good that cricket is a sport that is also in her sphere. A few years ago it probably wasn’t.”

What would it do for women’s cricket in South Africa if they won a World Cup before the men’s team, who have yet to reach a final? The question seemed to rouse unwelcome memories: Parnell has played in two ODI World Cups, three editions of the T20I variety and two Champions Trophies from June 2009, all without securing silverware. Perhaps the catastrophe that befell the South Africans in Adelaide last month at the T20 World Cup when, somehow, they lost to the Netherlands and crashed out of the running for the semi-finals, was still too raw in his mind. If that was indeed happening to Parnell, he managed to pull himself out of the recollection well enough to say, “Whether it’s in the men’s or the women’s game, we’re hungry for that ICC trophy.”

South Africa’s women’s team have been to seven ODI World Cups and another seven in the T20 format, and have also yet to make it to a final. An upside of not being the men’s team is that those failures sail below the radar. Maybe because she didn’t feature in any of them, or because she was determined to celebrate her birthday despite being marooned in a mall, or as a paid up member of cricket’s most chattering class, Jafta had all the while been laughing and talking and keeping up a stream of general jollity. What is it with keepers and noisiness?

Jafta could only speak for herself: “I don’t want the batters to settle, so if I keep quiet for an over or two it gives them time to do that. I believe in buzzing the whole time. It does mess up your train of thought. I’ve played against noisy wicketkeepers, and I’m like, ‘Shut up!’ But obviously I do exactly the same thing when I’m keeping.”

Then, suddenly, she was rendered speechless. The stumper silencer arrived to due fanfare in an open box. It was round, covered in chocolate shavings and crowned by a lit sparkler. Jafta had her cake. And could eat it, too.

Cricbuzz

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.